DOCSLIB.ORG

Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena Syntactic constraints on topicalization phenomena Carlos Rubio Alcala´ PhD Dissertation supervised by Dr. Ma Luisa Hernanz Carbo´ Candidate's Supervisor's signature signature Doctorate Program in Cognitive Science and Language Departamento de Filolog´ıaEspa~nola Centre de Ling¨u´ıstica Te`orica Facultad de Filosof´ıay Letras Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona Bellaterra, March 2014 The development of this doctoral dissertation has been possible thanks to a predoctoral grant for Research Formation (FI), given by the Ag`enciade Gesti´oi d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca of the Generalitat de Catalunya (2010-2013) and also due to funding provided by the following research projects: • \Microvariaci´onen la estructura oracional" (HUM 2006-13295-C02-02 (Consolider-C)) directed by Pr. Jos´eMar´ıaBrucart. • \Rasgos y periferias: variaci´onen la arquitectura de las categor´ıasfun- cionales" (FFI2011-29440-C03-01) directed by Pr. Ma Luisa Hernanz. A mis padres Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my thesis advisor Prof. Maria Llu¨ısa Hernanz, whose good disposition and astonishing grammatical knowledge have made this work much more fulfilling and interesting. For every pro- posal or analysis she always had a counterexample that forced me re-think everything I did. For every time we disagreed on something, she always gave me the freedom to pursue my ideas. The Centre de Ling¨u´ıstica Te`oricais a great place to do linguistic research and I feel very fortunate to have been given the chance to be a part of it. The generosity of its members and the constant intellectual challenge that they pose is only matched by the warmth with which they receive new members and the encouragement they offer to students. In special, I would like to thank Jos´eMar´ıa Brucart, Carme Picallo, Gemma Rigau, Jaume Mateu, and Anna Bartra for many suggestions and valuable advice. Angel´ Gallego stands apart as an inspiration for younger generations of students at the CLT and his contributions to my work are way too numerous to count. Fellow students (current and former, pre-doc and post-doc, from the CLT and beyond) Anna Gibert, Javi Fern´andez,Yurena Guti´errez,Eduard Art´es, El´ıasGallardo, Luc´ıaMedea Garc´ıa,H´ectorMart´ınez, ´Io Salmons, Marina Roman, Xico Torres, Laia Mayol, Jordi Fortuny, Teresa Blasco, Juan Romeu, Melania S´anchez, Cristina Real (in no particular order) have shared laughs, v frustration and enough moments to have become true friends. Two people stand out in my memories of these years, and in my heart. Isabel Castro is an example of so many good things I do not even know where to start. I do not know anybody with her capacity for work, commitment and intellectual honesty. She's also the best friend one could know. When I grow up I want to be just like her. Adriana Fasanella is the person with whom I have spent the most time in the last five years and I am grateful beyond words for every minute of it. She's a friend and a sister. She's the best part about having been in a PhD program, without question. The Department of Spanish of the Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona has provided all the support I could have needed and has allowed me to grow by allowing me to carry out activities beyond research. The months I spent at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York were among the most productive of my doctorate and that was due to the great environment I was able to be a part of those months. Both faculty and students were very welcoming and willing to provide me with new answers and new questions. Prof. Marcel den Dikken was extremely generous with his time and contributed with an inquiring mind to all aspects of this work that I presented him with. I am thankful to all the people who took a look at parts of the dissertation and always had comments and advice to make it better: Juan Uriagereka, Liliane Haegeman, Luigi Rizzi, Adriana Belletti, Olga Fern´andezSoriano, Antonio F´abregasand the audiences of conferences where parts of this work were presented, like the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Southern Utah University), the 9th Workshop on Syntax and Semantics (University of Siena), the ConSOLE XXII (University of Lisbon) and the CSIC and CLT Seminars. vi A great thing about drawing on data from many languages is the oppor- tunity it gives to talk to so many people. For their help with linguistic data I am grateful to Elena Ciutescu, Kano Kandabashi, Qiuyue Zhong, Andrea Bellavia, Pietro Delsante, Peter Herbeck and Maya Leela. This dissertation would not have come to an end without certain peace of mind. That was achieved by the love and support of my family and friends. My parents and brother are the foundation on which all the rest can stand. Alberto Louro must be one of the biologists with most syntactic knowl- edge out there (rather unwillingly). His understanding, love and support have meant the world to me. He has also provided the Galician data for the dissertation, but that is the least of the good things he does for me. Bellaterra, February 17th 2014. Carlos Rubio Alcala´ vii Contents Acknowledgements vii 1 Topicalization and the cartographic project 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 The problematic definition of topicalization . 7 1.2.1 Some semantic and pragmatic constraints on topicalization . 10 1.3 Different kinds of Topics . 18 1.3.1 Hanging Topics ...................... 19 1.3.2 Clitic Right Dislocation . 24 1.3.3 Modifier Topics ...................... 27 1.3.4 Arguments and non-arguments . 33 1.4 The cartographic project . 35 1.4.1 An introduction to the cartographic project . 35 1.4.2 Topics and the Cartographic Project . 46 1.5 Island constraints affecting CLLD . 53 1.5.1 Interesting contrasts . 54 1.6 Assumptions made about topicalization processes . 55 1.7 Organization of the thesis . 57 ix CONTENTS 2 A Movement-based approach to Clitic Left Dislocation 59 2.1 Introduction . 59 2.2 Proposals in favor of the base-generation of Topics . 60 2.3 Arguments in favor of Topic movement . 71 2.3.1 Existence of island constraints . 71 2.3.2 Case assignment . 80 2.3.3 Reconstruction effects . 85 2.3.4 Contrasts between CLLD and Hanging Topics . 87 2.3.5 Some experimental work with aphasic patients . 90 2.4 The approach taken in this work . 92 2.5 Some notes on islands . 104 2.6 A note on the methodology . 106 2.7 Interim summary . 108 3 Subject Island Violations 111 3.1 Introduction . 111 3.2 Subject Island violations . 113 3.3 On the nature of the Subject island constraint: a review of proposals . 117 3.3.1 Cinque's (1990) analysis . 118 3.3.2 A proposal in terms of Relativized Minimality . 129 3.3.3 Boeckx's (2003) account . 132 3.3.4 Richards's account . 140 3.3.5 A wrap-up of reviews . 146 3.4 Some notes on argument structures . 146 3.5 The timing of syntactic operations . 149 3.6 An account of subject island violations by CLLD . 150 3.7 Some consequences for the analysis of CLLD . 158 x Carlos Rubio Alcal´a 3.7.1 Differences among speakers . 162 3.7.2 Differences between Wh-movement and CLLD . 163 3.8 Conclusions . 165 4 Complex-NP and Adjunct Island Extraction 167 4.1 Introduction . 167 4.2 Complex-NP and Adjunt island violations . 168 4.3 Connectedness . 169 4.4 A Connectedness-based analysis of Complex-NP and Adjunct violations by CLLD . 175 4.4.1 Preliminaries . 175 4.4.2 Some implications of a Connectedness-based analysis . 180 4.4.3 Semantic Connectedness and the globality approach . 182 4.5 Conclusion . 185 5 CLLD and Conditional Clauses 187 5.1 Introduction . 187 5.2 Four problems for the analysis of CLLD from Conditional Clauses . 190 5.2.1 The first problem: Topics are extractable, but not always190 5.2.2 The second problem: Topics lack certain landing posi- tions . 192 5.2.3 The third problem: a Dative-Accusative asymmetry . 194 5.2.4 The fourth problem: not as many Topics as one would like . 195 5.3 Haegeman's work on the periphery of adverbial clauses . 197 5.4 Previous approaches: Etxepare's and Taylor's analyses . 203 5.4.1 Assumptions . 204 xi CONTENTS 5.4.2 Etxepare's analysis . 205 5.4.3 Taylor's analysis . 208 5.4.4 A criticism of the analysis . 214 5.5 A proposal for a simpler analysis . 220 5.6 Consequences for the broader analysis of topicalization processes232 5.7 Conclusion . 237 6 Conclusions and further research 239 xii Chapter 1 Topicalization and the cartographic project 1.1 Introduction The aim of this dissertation is to offer an account of the interaction between topicalization phenomena and the syntactic constraints that operate on them; in particular locality constraints of the strong island kind and how they prevent or allow processes of Clitic Left Dislocation we find in Romance languages. Although excursions will be made into other aspects of the Topic phenomena spectrum, and other linguistic families will be considered when they can shed light on the issues under discussion, the focus will remain on the Romance family and the syntactic constraints on Clitic Left Dislocation. The motivation behind this endeavour is to solve a number of empirical problems on the one hand and to provide a better theoretical understanding of the phenomena we find in the sentential left periphery on the other.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government and Binding Theory.1 I Shall Not Dwell on This Label Here; Its Significance Will Become Clear in Later Chapters of This Book
    Introduction: The Chomskian Perspective on Language Study Contents Introduction 1 Linguistics: the science of language 2 The native speaker: grammaticality and acceptability 2.1 Descriptive adequacy 2.2 Grammaticality and acceptability 2.3 The grammar as a system of principles 3 Knowledge of language 3.1 The poverty of the stimulus 3.2 Universal grammar 3.3 Parameters and universal grammar 3.4 Language learning and language acquisition 3.5 The generative linguist 4 The new comparative syntax 4.1 Principles and parameters: a recapitulation 4.2 The pro-drop properties 4.3 Relating the properties 4.4 Agreement and pro-drop 5 Purpose and organization of the book 5.1 General purpose 5.2 Organization 6 Exercises Introduction The aim of this book is to offer an introduction to the version of generative syntax usually referred to as Government and Binding Theory.1 I shall not dwell on this label here; its significance will become clear in later chapters of this book. Government-Binding Theory is a natural development of earlier versions of generative grammar, initiated by Noam Chomsky some thirty years ago. The purpose of this introductory chapter is not to provide a historical survey of the Chomskian tradition. A full discussion of the history of the generative enterprise would in itself be the basis for a book.2 What I shall do here is offer a short and informal sketch of the essential motivation for the line of enquiry to be pursued. Throughout the book the initial points will become more concrete and more precise. By means of footnotes I shall also direct the reader to further reading related to the matter at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • On Binding Asymmetries in Dative Alternation Constructions in L2 Spanish
    On Binding Asymmetries in Dative Alternation Constructions in L2 Spanish Silvia Perpiñán and Silvina Montrul University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1. Introduction Ditransitive verbs can take a direct object and an indirect object. In English and many other languages, the order of these objects can be altered, giving as a result the Dative Construction on the one hand (I sent a package to my parents) and the Double Object Construction, (I sent my parents a package, hereafter DOC), on the other. However, not all ditransitive verbs can participate in this alternation. The study of the English dative alternation has been a recurrent topic in the language acquisition literature. This argument-structure alternation is widely recognized as an exemplar of the poverty of stimulus problem: from a limited set of data in the input, the language acquirer must somehow determine which verbs allow the alternating syntactic forms and which ones do not: you can give money to someone and donate money to someone; you can also give someone money but you definitely cannot *donate someone money. Since Spanish, apparently, does not allow DOC (give someone money), L2 learners of Spanish whose mother tongue is English have to become aware of this restriction in Spanish, without negative evidence. However, it has been noticed by Demonte (1995) and Cuervo (2001) that Spanish has a DOC, which is not identical, but which shares syntactic and, crucially, interpretive restrictions with the English counterpart. Moreover, within the Spanish Dative Construction, the order of the objects can also be inverted without superficial morpho-syntactic differences, (Pablo mandó una carta a la niña ‘Pablo sent a letter to the girl’ vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumstantial Evidence for Syntactic Head Movement
    Circumstantial Evidence for Syntactic Head Move ment Bartosz Wiland University of Pozna 1. Introduction Recently, a number of analyses have advanced a thesis that syntactic heads are immobile and that head movement does not exist in grammar (cf. Mahajan 2001, 2003; Müller 2004, a.o.) or is severely restricted (e.g. Koopman and Szabolcsi 2000, Nilsen 2003). Such approaches take dislocation of the head X0 to be an instance of a remnant movement of the XP-constituent, preceded by vacating movements of other members of the XP. Detrimental to the claim that head movement does not exist is a scenario in which a dislocation of X0 is followed by a remnant movement of the XP-constituent. Such a derivational scenario is outlined in (1). 0 0 0 (1) a. [YP Y [P [XP X ZP]]] 0 0 0 b. [YP Y [P X + [XP tX0 ZP]]] 0 0 0 c. [YP [XP tX0 ZP][Y Y [P X + tXP ]]] The only possibility of dislocating the head X0 before remnant XP-fronting (in (1c)) is by X0-movement (in (1b)). In this paper, I argue that the derivational scenario in (1) is attested in Polish and it allows us to explain the interpretive contrast between (2a–d) and (2e). (2) a. Jan znowu pos a Marii ksi k . (repetitive) Ja n-NOM again sent Mary-DAT book-ACC b. Jan znowu Marii pos a ksi k . (repetitive) Ja n-NOM again Mary-DAT sent book-ACC c. Jan znowu ksi k pos a Marii. (repetitive) Jan-NOM again book-ACC sent Mary-DAT d.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1. Government 3.2 Agreement
    e-Content Submission to INFLIBNET Subject name: Linguistics Paper name: Grammatical Categories Paper Coordinator name Ayesha Kidwai and contact: Module name A Framework for Grammatical Features -II Content Writer (CW) Ayesha Kidwai Name Email id [email protected] Phone 9968655009 E-Text Self Learn Self Assessment Learn More Story Board Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Features as Values 3. Contextual Features 3.1. Government 3.2 Agreement 4. A formal description of features and their values 5. Conclusion References 1 1. Introduction In this unit, we adopt (and adapt) the typology of features developed by Kibort (2008) (but not necessarily all her analyses of individual features) as the descriptive device we shall use to describe grammatical categories in terms of features. Sections 2 and 3 are devoted to this exercise, while Section 4 specifies the annotation schema we shall employ to denote features and values. 2. Features and Values Intuitively, a feature is expressed by a set of values, and is really known only through them. For example, a statement that a language has the feature [number] can be evaluated to be true only if the language can be shown to express some of the values of that feature: SINGULAR, PLURAL, DUAL, PAUCAL, etc. In other words, recalling our definitions of distribution in Unit 2, a feature creates a set out of values that are in contrastive distribution, by employing a single parameter (meaning or grammatical function) that unifies these values. The name of the feature is the property that is used to construct the set. Let us therefore employ (1) as our first working definition of a feature: (1) A feature names the property that unifies a set of values in contrastive distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Wh-Concord in Okinawan = Syntactic Movement + Morphological Merger
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 22 Issue 1 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Article 20 Linguistics Conference 2016 Wh-Concord in Okinawan = Syntactic Movement + Morphological Merger Kunio Kinjo Yohei Oseki Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Kinjo, Kunio and Oseki, Yohei (2016) "Wh-Concord in Okinawan = Syntactic Movement + Morphological Merger," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 22 : Iss. 1 , Article 20. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol22/iss1/20 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol22/iss1/20 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wh-Concord in Okinawan = Syntactic Movement + Morphological Merger Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to provide a novel account for Wh-Concord in Okinawan based on the Copy Theory of Movement and Distributed Morphology. We propose that Wh-Concord interrogatives and Japanese-type wh-interrogatives have exactly the same derivation in the syntactic component: the Q- particle -ga, base-generated as adjoined to a wh-phrase, undergoes movement to the clause-final position. The two types of interrogatives are distinguished in the post-syntactic component: only in Wh-Concord, the -r morpheme on C0 triggers Morphological Merger, which makes it possible to Spell-Out lower copy of -ga. It is shown that the proposed analysis correctly predicts three descriptive generalizations on the distribution of -ga in
    [Show full text]
  • Derivational Economy in Syntax and Semantics
    Derivational Economy in Syntax and Semantics Željko Bošković and Troy Messick Summary Economy considerations have always played an important role in the generative theory of grammar. They are particularly prominent in the most recent instantiation of this approach, the Minimalist Program, which explores the possibility that Universal Grammar is an optimal way of satisfying requirements that are imposed on the language faculty by the external systems that interface with the language faculty which is also characterized by optimal, computationally efficient design. In this respect, the operations of the computational system that produce linguistic expressions must be optimal in that they must satisfy general considerations of simplicity and efficient design. Simply put, the guiding principles here are do something only if you need to; and if you do need to, do it in the most economical/efficient way. These considerations ban superfluous steps in derivations and superfluous symbols in representations. Under economy guidelines, movement takes place only when there is a need for it (with both syntactic and semantic considerations playing a role here), and when it does take place, it takes place in the most economical way: it is as short as possible and carries as little material as possible. Furthermore, economy is evaluated locally, on the basis of immediately available structure. The locality of syntactic dependencies is also enforced by minimal search and by limiting the number of syntactic objects and the amount of structure that are accessible in the derivation. This is achieved by transferring parts of syntactic structure to the interfaces during the derivation, the transferred parts not being accessible for further syntactic operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntactic Movement 24.900/R02
    October 19, 2018 Syntactic movement 24.900/R02 Syntactic movement Introduction to Linguistics, Instructor: Prof. Adam Albright Section R02, Suzana Fong ([email protected]) Recitation #6, October 19, 2018 1 Overview and recap Recall: this is the structure that we have for sentences: (1) CP 0 C C IP 0 NP I I VP 0 (modifier(s)) V V (XP) Where XP is the complement of the verb; it can be an NP, a PP, or a CP. This gives us a neat structure to capture the linear order of English interrogative sentences: (2) Yes/No question (closed-ended question) (3) Constituent question (open-ended question) a. The dog will eat the watermelon. a. Rosa has criticized Ana. b. Will the dog eat the watermelon? b. Who has Rosa cricitized ? Hypothesis: auxiliaries and interrogatives phrases (what, which picture, etc) are born in the position that their non- interrogative counterparts occupy and then they are moved to C and Spec-CP, respectively. ² Movement: an operation that takes a constituent (phrase or head) and places it elsewhere in the sentence. ² Consequence of movement: constituents can be interpreted in one position (e.g. complement of VP), but pro- nounced in another (e.g. Spec-CP). This property of languages is called displacement. 1/10 October 19, 2018 Syntactic movement 24.900/R02 Formalizing movement (4) a. Take an element α (word or phrase) and move it to an eligible higher position P. i. P must be empty (no overt morpheme). ii. P must be a suitable host for the type of element (heads to heads/argument positions, phrases to modifier positions) b.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Ungrammatical
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ UNGRAMMATICAL DOUBLE-ISLAND SLUICING AS A DIAGNOSTIC OF LEFT-BRANCH POSITIONING A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in LINGUISTICS by Sara Cantor June 2013 The Thesis of Sara Cantor is approved: Professor Jorge Hankamer, Chair Professor Sandy Chung Professor Pranav Anand Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Problem 3 3 The Facts 5 3.1 Islands that do not form a barrier to amelioration . 5 Complex Noun Phrase: Relative Clause . 6 Complex Noun Phrase: Noun with CP Complement . 8 CoordinateStructure . 10 Adjunct ............................ 12 3.2 Islands that do form a barrier to amelioration . 14 Subjects............................ 14 SententialSubjects . .. .. 16 Topicalization......................... 18 4 Background on Sluicing 19 4.1 MovementandDeletion ....................... 20 4.2 LF-CopyingandMerger ....................... 22 5 Proposal 23 5.1 Certain islands are barriers to island amelioration . 23 5.2 MovementorSpecifiers? ....................... 24 Movement to a Non-Specifier Position: Leftward Adjuncts 25 Movement to a Non-Specifier Position: Heavy NP Shift . 27 Base-Generated Specifiers: Small Clause Subjects . 30 Generalization about Amelioration Blocking . 32 5.3 NotaRecencyEffect ......................... 32 5.4 NotPropositionalvs.PFIslands . 33 6 Theoretical Implications 34 6.1 ImplicationsforCoordinateStructures . 34 6.2 Extraposition ............................. 36 7 Future Questions 40 7.1 Non-SluicingContexts ........................ 40 7.2 D-Linking ............................... 41 8 Conclusion 42 9 References 43 iii Abstract Ungrammatical Double-Island Sluicing as a Diagnostic of Left-Branch Positioning Sara Cantor Sluicing, as described by Ross (1969), Chung, Ladusaw, and McCloskey (1995), and Merchant (2001), ameliorates island violations. In this paper, I identify constructions in which sluicing does not ameliorate island viola- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTACTIC VS. POST-SYNTACTIC MOVEMENT* Susi Wurmbrand
    SYNTACTIC VS. POST-SYNTACTIC MOVEMENT* Susi Wurmbrand University of Connecticut 1. Introduction This paper addresses the question of where word order variation that has no semantic effect is represented. The case I will concentrate on is multiple verb constructions in West Germanic, which involve complex patterns of re-ordering of the verbal elements involved. As an illustration consider (1): while Dutch allows either order between a modal and the selected infinitive (in this construction), the infinitive has to precede the modal in German, whereas the modal has to precede the infinitive in Afrikaans. Importantly, all sentences in (1) have the same meaning and re-ordering has no semantic effect. (1) John can work tomorrow. a. dat Jan morgen werken kan / kan werken Dutch that Jan tomorrow work can / can work b. dass Hans morgen arbeiten kann / *kann arbeiten German that John tomorrow work can / can work c. dat Jan môre *werk kan / kan werk Afrikaans that Jan tomorrow work can / can work In this paper I will pursue the idea that semantically vacuous word order changes are not part of syntax proper, but rather occur in a post-syntactic (PF) component. The mechanism suggested for this re-ordering will be language and construction specific inversion of sister nodes. I will present two preliminary arguments for this view: i) morphological operations feed verb cluster re-ordering; ii) only the word orders that cannot be derived by simple inversion of sister nodes show semantic/pragmatic effects. 2. Re-ordering tools Before discussing various options that have been suggested to derive the word order differences in verb clusters, it is important to note that some re-ordering mechanism is necessary and that the different word orders cannot be just the result of different base structures.
    [Show full text]
  • A PROLOG Implementation of Government-Binding Theory
    A PROLOG Implementation of Government-Binding Theory Robert J. Kuhns Artificial Intelligence Center Arthur D. Little, Inc. Cambridge, MA 02140 USA Abstrae_~t For the purposes (and space limitations) of A parser which is founded on Chomskyts this paper we only briefly describe the theories Government-Binding Theory and implemented in of X-bar, Theta, Control, and Binding. We also PROLOG is described. By focussing on systems of will present three principles, viz., Theta- constraints as proposed by this theory, the Criterion, Projection Principle, and Binding system is capable of parsing without an Conditions. elaborate rule set and subcategorization features on lexical items. In addition to the 2.1 X-Bar Theory parse, theta, binding, and control relations are determined simultaneously. X-bar theory is one part of GB-theory which captures eross-categorial relations and 1. Introduction specifies the constraints on underlying structures. The two general schemata of X-bar A number of recent research efforts have theory are: explicitly grounded parser design on linguistic theory (e.g., Bayer et al. (1985), Berwick and Weinberg (1984), Marcus (1980), Reyle and Frey (1)a. X~Specifier (1983), and Wehrli (1983)). Although many of these parsers are based on generative grammar, b. X-------~X Complement and transformational grammar in particular, with few exceptions (Wehrli (1983)) the modular The types of categories that may precede or approach as suggested by this theory has been follow a head are similar and Specifier and lagging (Barton (1984)). Moreover, Chomsky Complement represent this commonality of the (1986) has recently suggested that rule-based pre-head and post-head categories, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Malagasy Extraposition: Evidence for PF Movement
    Nat Lang Linguist Theory https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09505-2 Malagasy extraposition Evidence for PF movement Eric Potsdam1 Received: 28 August 2018 / Accepted: 23 January 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Extraposition is the non-canonical placement of dependents in a right- peripheral position in a clause. The Austronesian language Malagasy has basic VOXS word order, however, extraposition leads to VOSX. Extraposed constituents behave syntactically as though they were in their undisplaced position inside the predicate at both LF and Spell Out. This paper argues that extraposition is achieved via movement at Phonological Form (PF). I argue against alternatives that would derive extraposi- tion with syntactic A’ movement or stranding analyses. Within a Minimalist model of grammar, movement operations take place on the branch from Spell Out to PF and have only phonological consequences. Keywords Malagasy · Extraposition · Movement · Phonological Form · Word order 1 Introduction Extraposition—the non-canonical placement of certain constituents in a right- peripheral position—has been investigated in detail in only a small number of lan- guages. There is a considerable literature for English, SOV Germanic languages Ger- man and Dutch, and the SOV language Hindi-Urdu. The construction has not been widely explored in other, typologically distinct languages. This lacuna means that we have probably not seen the full range of options and have also not tested pro- posed analyses in the widest possible way. The goal of this paper is to investigate in some detail extraposition in Malagasy, an Austronesian language with basic VOXS word order spoken by approximately 17 million people on the island of Madagascar.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Generalized Pied-Piping Sayaka Funakoshi, Doctor Of
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: A Theory of Generalized Pied-Piping Sayaka Funakoshi, Doctor of Philosophy, 2015 Dissertation directed by: Professor Howard Lasnik Department of Linguistics The purpose of this thesis is to construct a theory to derive how pied-piping of formal features of a moved element takes place, by which some syntactic phenomena related to φ-features can be accounted for. Ura (2001) proposes that pied-piping of formal-features of a moved element is constrained by an economy condition like relativized minimality. On the basis of Ura’s (2001) proposal, I propose that how far an element that undergoes movement can carry its formal features, especially focusing on φ-features in this thesis, is determined by two conditions, a locality condition on the generalized pied-piping and an anti-locality condition onmovement. Given the proposed analysis, some patterns of so-called wh-agreement found in Bantu languages can be explained and with the assumption that φ-features play an role for binding, presence or absence of WCO effects in various languages can be derived without recourse to A/A-distinctions.¯ ATHEORYOFGENERALIZEDPIED-PIPING by Sayaka Funakoshi Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Advisory Committee: Professor Howard Lasnik, Chair/Advisor Professor Norbert Hornstein Professor Omer Preminger Professor Steven Ross Professor Juan Uriagereka c Copyright by ! Sayaka Funakoshi 2015 Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Howard Lasnik for his patience, support and encouragement.
    [Show full text]