DOCSLIB.ORG

Nos Hydrographic Surveys Specifications and Deliverables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nos Hydrographic Surveys Specifications and Deliverables NOS HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS SPECIFICATIONS AND DELIVERABLES April 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Definition . 1 1.2 Changes from April 2008 . 1 2 Datums 3 2.1 Horizontal Datum . 3 2.2 Sounding Datum . 3 2.3 Time . 3 3 Hydrographic Position Control 4 3.1 Horizontal Position Accuracy . 4 3.2 Differential Global Positioning System . 4 3.2.1 DGPS Specifications . 4 3.2.2 DGPS Site Confirmation . 5 3.2.3 Other GPS Techniques . 5 4 Tides and Water Levels Requirements 6 4.1 General Project Requirements and Scope . 6 4.1.1 Scope . 6 4.1.2 Objectives . 6 4.1.3 Planning and Preliminary Tidal Zoning . 7 4.1.4 NOS Control Stations and Data Quality Monitoring . 7 4.1.5 General Data and Reference Datum Requirements . 8 4.1.6 Error Budget Considerations . 8 4.2 Data Collection and Field Work . 9 4.2.1 Water Level Station Requirements . 9 4.2.2 Water Level Measurement Systems and Data Transmissions . 10 4.2.3 Station Installation, Operation and Removal . 12 4.2.4 Tide Staffs . 14 4.2.5 Bench Marks and Leveling . 19 4.2.6 Water level Station Documentation . 20 4.2.7 Additional Field Requirements . 20 4.2.8 Geodetic Connections and Datums Relationship . 21 4.2.9 NAVD 88 Level Tie . 21 4.2.10GPS Observations . 22 4.2.11North American Datum (NAD 83) GPS Tie . 25 4.2.12GPS Data Processing Using OPUS . 26 4.2.13OPUS DB Preliminary Information . 27 4.2.14NAVD 88 GPS Tie . 29 4.3 Data Processing and Reduction . 29 4.3.1 Data Quality Control . 29 4.3.2 Data Processing and Tabulation of the Tide . 29 4.3.3 Computation of Monthly Means . 30 4.3.4 Data Editing and Gap Filling Specifications . 30 4.4 Computation of Tidal Datums and Water Level Datums . 34 4.4.1 National Tidal Datum Epoch . 34 4.4.2 Computational Procedures . 34 4.4.3 Tidal Datum Recovery . 34 4.4.4 Quality Control . 50 4.5 Final Zoning and Tide Reducers . 50 4.5.1 Water Level Station Summaries . 50 4.5.2 Construction of Final Tidal Zoning Schemes . 51 4.5.3 Tide Reducer Files and Final Tide Note . 51 4.6 Data Submission Requirements . 57 4.6.1 Station Documentation . 57 4.6.2 GPS Project Documentation . 58 4.6.3 Water Level Data . 73 4.6.4 Tabulations and Tidal Datums . 76 4.6.5 Tide Reducers and Final Zoning and Final Tide Note . 82 4.6.6 Submission and Deliverables – Documentation and Time lines . 82 4.7 Guidelines and References . 85 5 Depth Sounding 87 5.1 Multibeam and Other Echosounders . 87 5.1.1 Accuracy and Resolution Standards . 87 5.1.1.1 Accuracy Standards . 87 5.1.1.2 Multibeam Resolution Standards . 88 5.1.1.3 Gridded Data Specifications . 88 5.1.2 Coverage . 90 5.1.2.1 Object Detection Coverage . 90 5.1.2.2 Complete Multibeam Coverage . 91 5.1.2.3 Set Line Spacing . 92 5.1.3 Corrections to Echo Soundings . 92 5.1.3.1 Instrument Error Corrections . 93 5.1.3.2 Draft Corrections . 94 5.1.3.3 Speed of Sound Corrections . 95 5.1.3.4 Attitude Corrections . 97 5.1.3.5 Error Budget Analysis for Depths . 97 5.1.3.6 Uncertainty Budget Analysis for Depths . 99 5.1.4 Quality Control . 100 5.1.4.1 Multibeam Sonar Calibration . 100 5.1.4.2 Positioning System Confidence Checks . 101 5.1.4.3 Crosslines . 101 5.2 Lidar . 102 5.2.1 Accuracy and Resolution Standards . 102 5.2.1.1 Lidar Resolution Standards . 102 5.2.1.2 Gridded Data Specifications . 103 5.2.2 Coverage . 103 5.2.3 Corrections to Lidar Soundings . 104 5.2.3.1 Instrument Error Corrections . 105 5.2.4 Quality Control . 105 5.2.4.1 Lidar Calibration . 105 5.2.4.2 Positioning System Confidence Checks . 105 5.2.4.3 Crosslines . 106 6 Towed Side Scan Sonar 107 6.1 Coverage . 107 6.2 Side Scan Acquisition Parameters and Requirements . 107 6.2.1 Accuracy . 107 6.2.2 Speed . 108 6.2.3 Towfish Height . 108 6.2.4 Horizontal Range . 108 6.3 Quality Control . 108 6.3.1 Confidence Checks . 108 6.3.2 Significant Contacts . 109 6.3.3 Contact Correlation . 109 6.3.4 Identification of Potential Field Examinations . 109 7 Other Data 110 7.1 Bottom Characteristics . 110 7.2 Aids to Navigation . 110 8 Deliverables 111 8.1 Field Reports . 111 8.1.1 Progress Sketch and Survey Outline . 111 8.1.2 Danger to Navigation . 111 8.1.2.1 Charted Feature Removal Request . 113 8.1.3 Descriptive Report (DR) . 114 8.1.4 Descriptive Report Supplemental Reports . 123 8.1.4.1 Data Acquisition and Processing Report . 123 8.1.4.2 Horizontal and Vertical Control Report . 125 8.2 S-57 Feature File . 126 8.2.1 S-57 Attribution . 127 8.2.2 Cartographic Specifications and Conventions . 132 8.3 Side Scan Sonar . 134 8.3.1 Side Scan Sonar Mosaic . 134 8.3.2 Side Scan Sonar Contact List . 134 8.3.3 Data Acquisition and Processing Abstracts . 136 8.4 Digital Data Files . 138 8.4.1 Media . 138 8.4.2 Single-beam Data . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 289 Combination of Bidirectional-Cell Test and Conventional Head-Down
    Orchard Central, Singapore Fellenius, B.H., and Tan, S.A., 2010. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test. The Art of Foundation Engineering Practice, ""Honoring Clyde Baker", ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, Edited by M.H. Hussein, J.B. Anderson, and W.M. Camp, GSP 198, pp. 240-259. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test Bengt H. Fellenius1), M.ASCE and Tan Siew Ann2), M.ASCE 1) 2475 Rothesay Avenue, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 2B9. <[email protected]> 2) Civil Engineering Department, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. <[email protected]> ABSTRACT. Bidirectional-cell tests were performed in Singapore on four bored piles in a residual soil and underlying weathered, highly fractured bedrock called the Bukit Timah Granite formation. Two of the piles were 1.2 m diameter, uninstrumented, and 28 m and 38 m long. The other two were strain-gage instrumented, 1.0 m diameter piles, both 37 m long. The latter tests combined the cell test with conventional head-down testing. Analysis of the test results indicated that the pile toe stiffness was low. The evaluation of the strain-gage data showed that the pile material modulus was a function of the induced strain. The desired axial working load was 10 MN, and the combined cell and head-down tests correlated to a head-down test with a maximum applied load of 38 MN, which, although smaller than the ultimate resistance of the piles, was taken as the capacity of piles constructed similar to the second set of test piles at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Quite Common for Confusion to Arise About the Process Used During a Hydrographic Survey When GPS-Derived Water Surface
    It is quite common for confusion to arise about the process used during a hydrographic survey when GPS-derived water surface elevation is incorporated into the data as an RTK Tide correction. This article explains a little about the process. What we are discussing here might be a tide-related correction to a chart datum for coastal surveying – maybe to update navigational charts, or it might be nothing to do with tides at all. For example, surveying a river with the need to express bathymetry results as a bottom elevation on the desired vertical datum – not simply as “depth” results. Whether it is anything to do with tidal forces or not, the term “RTK Tide” is ubiquitous in hydrographic-speak to refer to vertical corrections of echo sounding data using RTK GPS. Although there is some confusing terminology, it’s a simple idea so let’s try to keep it that way. First keep in mind any GPS receiver will give the user basically two things in terms of vertical positioning: height above the GPS reference ellipsoid surface and height above Mean Sea Level (MSL) where ever he or she is on the Earth. How is MSL defined? Well, a geoid surface is a measure of the strength of gravity which in turn mostly controls the height of the sea; it is logical to say that MSL height equals the geoid height and vice versa. Using RTK techniques to obtain tide information is a logical extension of this basic principle. We are measuring the GPS receiver height above a geoid.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests in Cohesive Soils
    Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 INTERPRETATION OF CONE PENETRATION TESTS IN COHESIVE SOILS by Kwang Kyun Kim Graduate Research Assistant Monica Prezzi Assistant Professor and Rodrigo Salgado Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University Joint Transportation Research Program Project No. C-36-45T File No. 6-18-18 SPR-2632 Conducted in Cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Indiana Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana December 2006 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Interpretation of Cone Penetration tests in Cohesive Soils December 2006 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kwang Kyun Kim and Rodrigo Salgado FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Joint Transportation Research Program 550 Stadium Mall Drive Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051 11. Contract or Grant No. SPR-2632 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Indiana Department of Transportation State Office Building Final Report 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO SOUNDING CORRECTIONS (Article Handed to the I
    ECHO SOUNDING CORRECTIONS (Article handed to the I. H. B. by the U .S.S.R. Delegation of Observers at the Vllth International Hydrographic Conference) In the Soviet Union frequent use is made of echo sounders in routine hydrographic surveying, and all important surveys are carried out with the help of echo sounding apparatus. Depths recorded on echograms as well as depths entered in the sounding log must be corrected for a value which is the result of the algebraic addition of two partial corrections as follows : A Z f : correction for (( level error » A Z : conection of echo À When the value of the total correction is less than half the sounding accuracy, it is disregarded. The maximum tolerance figures allowed in sounding are shown below : From 0 to 20 m. : 0.4 m 21 to 50 m. : 0.7 m 51 to 100 m. : 1.5 m 101 and over :2 % of sounding depth Correction for level error. — The correction for the « error in level » is computed according to the following formula : A Z f = n _ f (1) n : reading of nearest tide gauge, corresponding to datum level determined; f : reading of tide gauge at time of taking soundings. Echo correction. — The depths determined by echo sounding must be subjected to corrections which are obtained as follows : (a) Immediately determined by calibration, or (b) According to the hydrological data available. I. — D etermination o f corrections b y calibration When determining echo corrections by calibration, the soundings are corrected as follows : (1) Determination of total correction A Z T in sounding area by calibration of echo sounding machine ; (2) A Z n correction for difference in speed of rotation of indicator disk with respect to speed determined during calibration ; The A Z q correction is applied when the number of revolutions of the indicator disk differs by more than 1 % during sounding operations from the value obtained during the initial calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive Report to Accompany Hydrographic Survey H11004
    NOAA FORM 76-35A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY DESCRIPTIVE REPORT Type of Survey: Navigable Area Registry Number: H12139 LOCALITY State: Rhode Island General Locality: Block Island Sound Sub-locality: 5 NM West of Block Island 2009 H12139 CHIEF OF PARTY CDR Shepard M.Smith NOAA LIBRARY & ARCHIVES DATE - i - NOAA FORM 77-28 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE REGISTRY NUMBER: (11-72) NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION HYDROGRAPHIC TITLE SHEET H12139 INSTRUCTIONS: The Hydrographic Sheet should be accompanied by this form, filled in as completely as possible, when the sheet is forwarded to the Office. State: Rhode Island General Locality: Block Island Sound, RI Sub-Locality: 5 NM West of Block Island Scale: 1:20,000 Date of Survey: 08/20/09 to 08/31/09 Instructions Dated: 26 February 2009 Project Number: OPR-B363-TJ-09 Vessel: NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson Chief of Party: CDR Shepard M. Smith , NOAA Surveyed by: Thomas Jefferson Personnel Soundings by: Reson 7125 multibeam echo sounder. Graphic record scaled by: N/A Graphic record checked by: N/A Protracted by: N/A Automated Plot: N/A Verification by: Atlantic Hydrographic Branch Soundings in: Meters at MLLW Remarks: 1) All Times are in UTC. 2) This is a Navigable Area Hydrographic Survey. 3) Projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 19. Bold, italic, red notes in the Descriptive Report were made during office processing. 2 OPR-B363-TJ-09 H12139 Table of Contents A. AREA SURVEYED………………………………………………………………………...4 B. DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING………………………………………………...6 B.1 EQUIPMENT………………………………………………………………………….6 B.2 QUALITY CONTROL………………………………………………………….……..6 Sounding Coverage…………………………………………………………………...6 Systematic Errors……………………………………………………………………..9 B.3 CORRECTIONS TO ECHO SOUNDINGS…………………………………...……...9 B.4 DATA PROCESSING……………………………………………………….…..……10 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Parametric Acoustics for the Detection of the Dredging Level in Areas with Siltation Jens Wunderlich, Prof
    7th Workshop on Dredging and Surveying, Scheveningen (The Haag), June 07th-08th 2001 Advantages of parametric acoustics for the detection of the dredging level in areas with siltation Jens Wunderlich, Prof. Dr. Gert Wendt, Rostock University Keywords sediment echo sounder, parametric acoustics, dredging level, siltation, Abstract Dredging companies and local authorities are interested in exact information about the dredging area and the material conditions, like sediment structures, sediment types and sediment volumes especially in ship channels and harbours. To get these information several equipment for sediment echo sounding is used. But what are the differences? What are the advantages of non- linear echo sounders compared to linear ones, especially in dredging areas with siltation? These questions are briefly discussed in this contribution. After that some survey examples, using a parametric echo sounder system, are given. Echo Sounding and Echo Sounder Parameters Sediment echo sounding means v = const transmitting sound pulses in direction ∆h water surface to the bottom and receiving reflected y x signals from the bottom and sediment a x b layers, see fig. 1. z ∆Θ,∆Φ There are some important parameters noise reverberation to classify echo sounder systems: Θ • Directivity h • Frequency • Pulse length, pulse ringing ∆τ bottom echo • Pulse repetition rate • Beam steering and stabilizing bottom surface • Heave compensation objects • Real time signal processing l • Size, weight, mobility a,c = f(material) layer echo These parameters and their meanings for surveys shall be discussed briefly. layer borders Figure 1: Echo sounding principle Directivity The directivity of the transmitted sound beam depends on the transducer dimensions related to the sound frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth Measuring Techniques
    EM 1110-2-1003 1 Jan 02 Chapter 9 Single Beam Acoustic Depth Measurement Techniques 9-1. General Scope and Applications Single beam acoustic depth sounding is by far the most widely used depth measurement technique in USACE for surveying river and harbor navigation projects. Acoustic depth sounding was first used in the Corps back in the 1930s but did not replace reliance on lead line depth measurement until the 1950s or 1960s. A variety of acoustic depth systems are used throughout the Corps, depending on project conditions and depths. These include single beam transducer systems, multiple transducer channel sweep systems, and multibeam sweep systems. Although multibeam systems are increasingly being used for surveys of deep-draft projects, single beam systems are still used by the vast majority of districts. This chapter covers the principles of acoustic depth measurement for traditional vertically mounted, single beam systems. Many of these principles are also applicable to multiple transducer sweep systems and multibeam systems. This chapter especially focuses on the critical calibrations required to maintain quality control in single beam echo sounding equipment. These criteria are summarized in Table 9-6 at the end of this chapter. 9-2. Principles of Acoustic Depth Measurement Reference water surface Transducer Outgoing signal VVeeloclocityty Transmitted and returned acoustic pulse Time Velocity X Time Draft d M e a s ure 2d depth is function of: Indexndex D • pulse travel time (t) • pulse velocity in water (v) D = 1/2 * v * t Reflected signal Figure 9-1. Acoustic depth measurement 9-1 EM 1110-2-1003 1 Jan 02 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Oceanographic-Acoustic Prediction and Bayesian Inversion for Wide Area Ocean Floor Mapping
    Ali, W.H., M.S. Bhabra, P.F.J. Lermusiaux, A. March, J.R. Edwards, K. Rimpau, and P. Ryu, 2019. Stochastic Oceanographic-Acoustic Prediction and Bayesian Inversion for Wide Area Ocean Floor Mapping. In: OCEANS '19 MTS/IEEE Seattle, 27-31 October 2019, doi:10.23919/OCEANS40490.2019.8962870 Stochastic Oceanographic-Acoustic Prediction and Bayesian Inversion for Wide Area Ocean Floor Mapping Wael H. Ali1, Manmeet S. Bhabra1, Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux†, 1, Andrew March2, Joseph R. Edwards2, Katherine Rimpau2, Paul Ryu2 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA †Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract—Covering the vast majority of our planet, the ocean The importance of an accurate knowledge of the seafloor is still largely unmapped and unexplored. Various imaging can hardly be overstated. It plays a significant role in aug- techniques researched and developed over the past decades, menting our knowledge of geophysical and oceanographic ranging from echo-sounders on ships to LIDAR systems in the air, have only systematically mapped a small fraction of the seafloor phenomena, including ocean circulation patterns, tides, sed- at medium resolution. This, in turn, has spurred recent ambitious iment transport, and wave action [16, 20, 41]. Ocean seafloor efforts to map the remaining ocean at high resolution. New knowledge is also critical for safe navigation of maritime approaches are needed since existing systems are neither cost nor vessels as well as marine infrastructure development, as in time effective. One such approach consists of a sparse aperture the case of planning undersea pipelines or communication mapping technique using autonomous surface vehicles to allow for efficient imaging of wide areas of the ocean floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specification Series 10000 Piling Works
    TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 10000 PILING WORKS Series 10000 –Piling Works NRAP-MoPW TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PART 10000 - PILING TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Number Page 10000 Board Cast in Place Piles 10-4 10001 Description 10-4 10100 Materials 10-4 10101 Steel Classing 10-4 10102 Concrete 10-5 10103 Reinforcement 10-5 10104 Drilling Fluid 10-5 10200 Construction Methods 10-5 10201 General 10-5 10202 Setting out Piles 10-6 10203 Diameter of Piles 10-7 10204 Tolerance 10-7 10205 Boring 10-7 10206 Placing Reinforcement 10-9 10207 Placing Concrete 10-9 10208 Extraction of Temporary Casing 10-10 10209 Temporary Support 10-10 10210 Records 10-12 10210 Measures in Case of Rejected Casing 10-12 10212 Measurement 10-12 10213 Payment 10-12 10300 Precast Concrete Units for River Training and Retaining Structures 10-13 10301 Description 10-13 10302 Materials 10-13 10303 Construction Methods 10-13 10304 King Post & Anchor Piles 10-14 10305 Precast Planks 10-14 10306 Tolerance 10-14 10307 Measurement 10-14 10308 Payment 10-14 10400 Pile Test Loading 10-15 10401 General 10-15 10402 Definitions 10-15 10403 Supervision 10-15 10500 Safety Precautions 10-16 10501 General 10-16 10502 Kentledge 10-16 10503 Tension Piles and Ground Anchors 10-16 10504 Testing Equipment 10-16 UNOPS-Afghanistan PART 10-1 Series 10000 –Piling Works NRAP-MoPW 10600 Construction of a Pilot Pile to be Test Loaded 10-17 10601 Notice of Construction 10-17 10602 Method of Constructions 10-17 10603 Boring or Driving Record 10-17 10604 Cut-Off Level 10-17 10605 Pile Head for Compression
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Water Acoustic Propagation at Arraial Do Cabo, Brazil Antonio Hugo S
    Shallow Water Acoustic Propagation at Arraial do Cabo, Brazil Antonio Hugo S. Chaves, Kleber Pessek, Luiz Gallisa Guimarães and Carlos E. Parente Ribeiro, LIOc-COPPE/UFRJ, Brazil Copyright 2011, SBGf - Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica. speed profile, the region of Arraial do Cabo. Finally in the This paper was prepared for presentation at the Twelfth International Congress of the last section we discuss and summarize our main results. Brazilian Geophysical Society, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 15-18, 2011. Theory Contents of this paper were reviewed by the Technical Committee of the Twelfth International Congress of The Brazilian Geophysical Society and do not necessarily represent any position of the SBGf, its officers or members. Electronic reproduction The intensity and phase of the sound field generated by a or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent acoustic source in the ocean can be deduced by solving the of The Brazilian Geophysical Society is prohibited. Helmholtz wave equation. The complexity of the acoustic environment like sound speed profile, the roughness of Abstract the sea surface, the stratification of the sea floor and The Brazilian coastal region is a huge platform the internal waves introduce acoustic fluctuations during where the propagation is dominantly in a waveguide the sound propagation that decrease the signal finesse delimited by the surface and the bottom. The region (Buckingham, 1992). Nowadays several types of solutions near Arraial do Cabo is a place where there is a for the sound pressure field are available, in this work we special sound speed profiles (SSP) regimes related deal with two of them namely: normal mode and ray tracing to shallow waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Surveys Specifications and Deliverables
    HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS SPECIFICATIONS AND DELIVERABLES March 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Change Management ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Changes from April 2018 ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Hydrographer ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Navigable Area Survey .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Pre-Survey Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Environmental Compliance .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 Dangers to Navigation ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report 13 Vol. 2
    Svensk Djupstabilisering Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre Report 13 International Conference on Deep Mixing Best Practice and Recent Advances Volume 2 Volume 2 Proceedings of the International Conference on Deep Mixing – Best Practice and Recent Advances, Deep Mixing’05 Stockholm, Sweden, May 23 – 25, 2005 SD Report 13, Volume 1 – 2 Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre, c/o Swedish Geotechnical Institute SE-581 93 Linkoping When using material from these Proceedings full credit shall be given to the conference and the author(s). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in these proceeding volumes are those of the author(s). The proceedings may be purchased from the Information Service, Swedish Geotechnical Institute SE-581 93 Linköping, Sweden Tel: 013 – 20 18 20 (int +46 13 201820) Fax: 013 – 20 19 14 (int +46 13 201914) E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1402-2036 ISRN SD-R--05/13--SE Conference Photos: Ulf Lonäs, Svensk Bergs- & Brukstidning and SGI Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre wish to acknowledge the Swedish National Rail Administration, SSAB Merox AB and SMA Svenska Mineral AB for their generous support to the publishing of the Proceedings of Deep Mixing ´05. II Deep Mixing´05 Volume 2 Preface The International Conference on Deep Mixing – Best Prac- discussed important topics, covering field and laboratory test- tice and Recent Advances (Deep Mixing ´05) was organised ing, design aspects and solidification of contaminated soils. by the Swedish Deep Stabilization Centre. Particular empha- In one session, the results of case histories were presented. sis was placed on the exchange of practical experience from During the conference, a Technical Exhibition was held, where the application of dry and wet mixing methods.
    [Show full text]