A Semiotic Multimodal Analysis and South African Case Study: the Representation and Construction of Masculinities in Men’S Health (Sa)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A SEMIOTIC MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS AND SOUTH AFRICAN CASE STUDY: THE REPRESENTATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF MASCULINITIES IN MEN’S HEALTH (SA) by CHRISTIAAN PETRUS CILLIERS submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject COMMUNICATION at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF A. C. ALLAIS CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF V. C. MILTON June 2014 DECLARATION Student number 611-658-2 I declare that A semiotic multimodal analysis and South African case study: The representation and construction of masculinities in Men’s Health (SA) is my own work and that all the sources that I have either used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of comprehensive references. C. P. Cilliers Date: 30 April 2014 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I gratefully acknowledge and thank the following people who assisted me in the completion of this study: • Prof Carol Allais and Prof Viola Milton – my study leaders – for their support, enthusiasm, guidance, critical comments, and insightful assistance during the completion of this thesis. • Mr David J Wigston for his support with designing the graphic model and critically reading and assisting with the concept maps; his invaluable help in finding relevant articles and books for my dissertation. • Dr Beschara Karam for her support, believing in me, long talks, critical readings, and constant encouragement. • Prof Pieter Fourie who contributed greatly to the expansion of my thinking around masculine identities and also for placing me on the road of developing the multimodal semiotic analysis model. • Dr Julie Reid for her constructive criticism of the initial multimodal model. • Mr Andrew Hills for his critical questions and tireless editing of this thesis. This study is dedicated to Ms Doreen Gough (retired from Public Relations and Corporate Communication, Unisa) for her compassion and inspiration as a mentor; to my sister Ohna van Zyl for all her love and support; to my partner, Maty Mbula; to my late aunt, Mrs Miemmie Kuhn (Muller, born Groenewald) for her dedication during my childhood. In conclusion, my warmest thanks are extended to friends and colleagues for their passionate encouragement and moral support during the research process. They are: Mr Lourens Claassen, Prof Charmaine du Plessis, Ms Annette du Toit (Lady Anne), Mr David Francis, Mr Kevin Galvin, Mr Mark Loutfie, Dr Janette Hanekom, Ms Sabihah Moola, Mr Theunis Prinsloo, Mr Connie Saayman, Ms Karin Taljaard, Prof Elize Terblanche, Ms Annelize Vermeulen, Mr Dirk Theunissen, Ms Soekie van Gass and Mr Akhona Zim. iii ABSTRACT The main question of this study was: How and in what way can a multimodal semiotic visual analysis model be developed and used for contributing to the analysis and understanding of the manner in which the Men’s Health (South Africa) magazine – as a case study – represents and constructs masculinities in South Africa? The following three subsidiary research questions were formulated to address this topic: • What is the literature revealing with reference to the media as producers of meaning in relation to masculinity and visual texts? • How and in which way can a semiotic visual analysis multimodal model be developed with the purpose of contributing to the analysis of visual texts? • What is the outcome of the visual analysis multimodal model with reference to the case study about the representation and construction of masculinities in visual texts in MH? The first aim of this research was to establish an overview of masculinities and to explore the visual representation of masculinity with reference to mediation, reality, and ideology in the media. With reference to the media as producers of meaning in relation to masculinity and visual texts, a semiotic visual analysis and social semiotics were used to unpack culture as a site of the production of meanings. The media is one of the main sources from which men receive their entertainment and information about the world. In this sense, the media makes sense of the world. Mass media plays a key role in discourse and constructing the relationships between reality and ideology. During this construction, the media reflects on existing opinions and attitudes in society. A quantitative content analysis and a qualitative semiotic multimodal visual analysis were conducted on 27 visual texts purposively selected from MH to include editions from July 2010 to June 2011. This population covered 12 front covers, 12 editorials and three flip covers. The developed visual multimodal model was tested qualitatively on nine visual texts since these texts included the front covers, flip covers and editorials of the three editions with flip covers. iv A second major aim of the study was to establish the way in which a semiotic visual analysis multimodal model needed to be developed and used for analysing visual texts, as well as for analysing the visual texts according to the multimodal model in order to understand how the multimodality and social semiotic resources were applied in MH to represent and construct masculinities. The rationale for the development and design of this model was based on the premise that a basic understanding of semiotics and visual language was needed. Without such an understanding, the vast amounts of visual messages that confront the reader would remain incomprehensible. Consequently, a productive dialogue in relation to visual communication cannot take place. The multimodal model developed in this thesis highlights visual text layout, in conjunction with language-in-use, that does not occur in isolation and that is deeply reliant on other forms of making meaning. The heptagon multimodal model consists of concept maps of the six functions of the designed hexagon model. This multimodality approach includes analysing simultaneously occurring semiotics and their various roles in conjunction with detailed, all- inclusive discourses. In the quantitative content analysis and the qualitative multimodal semiotic analysis, the six components of the developed heptagon model (visual grammar, positioning, typography, colour, modality, and iconography) are illustrated. The quantitative research supported the main research design, i.e. the qualitative multimodal semiotic analysis. It is envisaged that the development and construction of a multimodal semiotic model will make a contribution to the scholarly field of semiotic analysis. By discussing the fluidity of the variations of masculinities and male identities, by giving a brief overview of the role of the media in constructing masculinities, and by focusing on the discourses that took place in MH, the researcher creates an awareness of the inherited patriarchal masculinities by recommending envisioned masculinities to be inclusive as a component of the solution. This approach is illustrated by the use and findings of the multimodal semiotic visual analysis. v Key terms: masculinity; construction; representation; social semiotics; visual grammar; hexagon model; multimodal model; multimodal analysis; visual discourse; concept maps. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ...................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................iii ABSTRACT............................................................................................................ iv CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 RELEVANCE OF THE INVESTIGATION................................................. 4 1.3 CONTRIBUTION OF THIS STUDY .......................................................... 9 1.4 RATIONALE FOR THIS STUDY ............................................................ 10 1.5 DEMARCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC ........................ 11 1.5.1 The main research issue............................................................ 12 1.6 APPROACHING THE STUDY ................................................................ 12 1.6.1 Methodological approach ........................................................... 13 1.6.2 Theoretical approach ................................................................. 14 1.7 OUTLINE OF THE THESIS .................................................................... 16 1.8 CONCLUSION......................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW PART I: SEMIOTICS ................................................... 19 2.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 19 2.2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF SEMIOTICS ...................................................... 19 2.3 SEMIOTICS AS THEORY ...................................................................... 21 2.4 SOCIAL SEMIOTICS DEFINED ............................................................. 23 2.5 SEMIOTICS: CONTEXT, MAKING, AND INTERPRETING MEANING ................................................................................................ 26 2.5.1 Semiotics and context ................................................................ 26 2.5.2 Semiotics and making meaning ................................................. 27 2.4.3 Meaning as representation ........................................................ 28 2.6 SEMIOTICS: REPRESENTATION,