DOCSLIB.ORG

DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Third Session – Forty-Second Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable Myrna Driedger Speaker Vol. LXXV No. 13A - 10 a.m., Tuesday, November 3, 2020 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Forty-Second Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation ADAMS, Danielle Thompson NDP ALTOMARE, Nello Transcona NDP ASAGWARA, Uzoma Union Station NDP BRAR, Diljeet Burrows NDP BUSHIE, Ian Keewatinook NDP CLARKE, Eileen, Hon. Agassiz PC COX, Cathy, Hon. Kildonan-River East PC CULLEN, Cliff, Hon. Spruce Woods PC DRIEDGER, Myrna, Hon. Roblin PC EICHLER, Ralph, Hon. Lakeside PC EWASKO, Wayne Lac du Bonnet PC FIELDING, Scott, Hon. Kirkfield Park PC FONTAINE, Nahanni St. Johns NDP FRIESEN, Cameron, Hon. Morden-Winkler PC GERRARD, Jon, Hon. River Heights Lib. GOERTZEN, Kelvin, Hon. Steinbach PC GORDON, Audrey Southdale PC GUENTER, Josh Borderland PC GUILLEMARD, Sarah, Hon. Fort Richmond PC HELWER, Reg, Hon. Brandon West PC ISLEIFSON, Len Brandon East PC JOHNSON, Derek Interlake-Gimli PC JOHNSTON, Scott Assiniboia PC KINEW, Wab Fort Rouge NDP LAGASSÉ, Bob Dawson Trail PC LAGIMODIERE, Alan Selkirk PC LAMONT, Dougald St. Boniface Lib. LAMOUREUX, Cindy Tyndall Park Lib. LATHLIN, Amanda The Pas-Kameesak NDP LINDSEY, Tom Flin Flon NDP MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood NDP MARCELINO, Malaya Notre Dame NDP MARTIN, Shannon McPhillips PC MOSES, Jamie St. Vital NDP MICHALESKI, Brad Dauphin PC MICKLEFIELD, Andrew Rossmere PC MORLEY-LECOMTE, Janice Seine River PC NAYLOR, Lisa Wolseley NDP NESBITT, Greg Riding Mountain PC PALLISTER, Brian, Hon. Fort Whyte PC PEDERSEN, Blaine, Hon. Midland PC PIWNIUK, Doyle Turtle Mountain PC REYES, Jon Waverley PC SALA, Adrien St. James NDP SANDHU, Mintu The Maples NDP SCHULER, Ron, Hon. Springfield-Ritchot PC SMITH, Andrew Lagimodière PC SMITH, Bernadette Point Douglas NDP SMOOK, Dennis La Vérendrye PC SQUIRES, Rochelle, Hon. Riel PC STEFANSON, Heather, Hon. Tuxedo PC TEITSMA, James Radisson PC WASYLIW, Mark Fort Garry NDP WHARTON, Jeff, Hon. Red River North PC WIEBE, Matt Concordia NDP WISHART, Ian Portage la Prairie PC WOWCHUK, Rick Swan River PC 495 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA Tuesday, November 3, 2020 The House met at 10 a.m. church's governance structure. Bill 300 continues the tradition of this Legislature playing a role in Madam Speaker: O Eternal and Almighty God, from legitimizing and codifying administrative procedures Whom all power and wisdom come, we are assembled and protections of institutions in this province. here before Thee to frame such laws as may tend to the welfare and prosperity of our province. Grant, O United Church is the largest Protestant denomi- merciful God, we pray Thee, that we may desire only nation in Canada, with approximately 2 million that which is in accordance with Thy will, that we may adherents. The church has been a leading voice for seek it with wisdom and know it with certainty and social justice in Canada for almost 100 years. United accomplish it perfectly for the glory and honour of Church of Canada was incorporated in 1924 by an Thy name and for the welfare of all our people. Amen. act of Parliament. Please be seated. That same year, the Manitoba act was passed in ORDERS OF THE DAY this Legislature dealing with property and rights and PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS powers of the United Church in Manitoba. This means that any significant structural or administrative Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Government House changes made federally must be ratified through Leader): Good morning, Madam Speaker. provincial legislation. Could you please call for debate of second readings, Bill 300, The United Church of Canada At first glance, the original United Church of Amendment Act, sponsored by the honourable Canada Act was a simple piece of legislation. It was a member for Dauphin (Mr. Michaleski). private bill that incorporated three religious bodies: the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Congregational Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the churches in Canada. House will consider second reading of private Bill 300, The United Church of Canada Amendment Like many religious denominations across the Act. country, United Church of Canada is facing social, demographic and financial pressures. Membership SECOND READINGS–PRIVATE BILLS in the church peaked in 1964 at 1.1 million, and it's Bill 300–The United Church of Canada 'accline'–declined since that time. From 1991 to 2001, Amendment Act the number of people claiming an affiliation with the United Church decreased by 8 per cent, the third Mr. Greg Nesbitt (Riding Mountain): I largest decrease in mainstream Christian denomina- move, seconded by the member for Assiniboia tions in Canada. (Mr. Johnston), that Bill 300, The United Church of Canada Amendment Act, be now read a second Church statistics for the end of 2018 showed time and be referred to a committee of this House. 388,363 members in 317,051 households under Motion presented. pastoral care, of whom 120,986 attend services regularly in 2,119 communities of faith representing Madam Speaker: Before we proceed, I wonder if the 2,774 congregations across Canada. As I said earlier, member happens to have his headset there. We're Statistics Canada has reported that approximately having difficulty hearing him in the House. 2 million people identify as adherents. Mr. Nesbitt: I was trying the headset and I can't make A new structure to address changes in the realities it work. I'll talk loud. of the United Church of Canada was first broached at the General Council in 2012. A committee was Madam Speaker: Okay. put in place to come up with general reorganization Mr. Nesbitt: Madam Speaker, I am pleased to proposals. A document with the suggested changes sponsor this private bill that will amend The United was approved for discussion with the entire mem- Church of Canada Act to reflect changes to the bership at the 42nd General Council in 2015. After 496 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA November 3, 2020 nearly three years of discussion and debate at the church to focus more of its precious resources on the congregational and presbytery levels, significant its global and community work and in promoting its changes to the church structure were confirmed faith. At its core, this reorganization will help the by the United Church's 43rd General Council in church focus on its mission of making a positive July 2018. difference in people's lives through faith and moral commitments that come with faith. Madam Speaker, one important change involves the United Church of Canada moving from four * (10:10) courts, as they are called–pastoral charge, presbytery, This legislation reshapes the church's governance conference and General Council–to three councils: with better decision-making, accountability and trans- a local community of faith or congregation, a regional parency, keeping the church's vision and mission council, and a national General Council. The United clear. The Canadian Parliament passed the federal Church of Canada believes the three-council model version of this bill in 'semptember' 2019. The Ontario provides a more agile and sustainable structure Legislative Assembly passed a provincial version of that better supports and enables the church's main this bill in April 2019. purpose of ministry and mission, and also reduces administrative costs. Madam Speaker, today I urge all honourable members in this Assembly to pass this important bill The church's national General Council will will unanimously and send it on to committee. be reduced from 68 voting and corresponding members to 18 in total. This will allow for the council Thank you. to work in a more agile and engaged way while Questions continuing to ensure representation by church populations from all across Canada. Madam Speaker: A question period of up to 10 minutes will be held. Questions may be addressed A portion of Bill 300 outlines the conditions and to the sponsoring member by any member in the terms of how a majority of trustees of a congregation– following sequence: first question to be asked by a but only with the consent in writing of the regional member from another party, this is to be followed by council–could undertake to sell church land in a rotation between the parties, each independent either a public or private sale. This is a reality that is member may ask one question. And no question or happening in many areas of rural Manitoba as answer shall exceed 45 seconds. congregations disband and merge with other congregations, creating surplus property. Mr. Matt Wiebe (Concordia): I just want to begin by thanking the member for bringing this bill forward An office of vocation, which has been described here for debate. to me as similar to a College of Physicians and Surgeons, would be established to handle personnel Certainly lots to talk about and lots to support matters involving clergy and other employees who here this morning, but I just wanted to begin by asking work for the church. Previously, this work would have about consultation. I understand this is brought been handled by volunteers on the ministry and forward by the United Church of Canada. But locally, personnel committee. I'm wondering if he can just talk about some of the churches in his own community, maybe throughout Madam Speaker, these amendments bring the the province, that he has had a chance to talk to. United Church of Canada's structure into the 21st century to meet the current needs of the Mr. Greg Nesbitt (Riding Mountain): Well, thank church. The church membership understands it no you very much to the member for Concordia for that longer has the volunteers or money to support its question. current structures and processes. It is important to As I stated, this was an eight-year process.
Recommended publications
  • Hon. Stanley H. Knowles Fonds MG 32, C 59

    Hon. Stanley H. Knowles Fonds MG 32, C 59

    LIBRARY AND BIBLIOTHÈQUE ET ARCHIVES CANADA ARCHIVES CANADA Canadian Archives and Direction des archives Special Collections Branch canadiennes et collections spéciales Hon. Stanley H. Knowles fonds MG 32, C 59 Finding Aid No. 1611 / Instrument de recherche no 1611 Prepared by Colleen Dempsey and David Préparé par Colleen Dempsey et David Ross. Ross. Revised in 1991 by Geoff Ott for the Révisé en 1991 par Geoff Ott pour le service Political Archives Service. des archives politiques. -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Index Headings .............................................................. ii Guide to the Finding Aid ...................................................... .xii Political Series vols. 1-349 ......................................................... 1-256 vols. 398-402 ..................................................... 293-295 vols. 412-485 ..................................................... 300-359 vols. 488-494 ..................................................... 361-366 vols. 502-513 ......................................................... 371 Canadian Labour Congress vols. 350-389 ..................................................... 256-288 vol. 513 ............................................................. 380 Personal Series vols. 390-397 ..................................................... 288-293 vols. 403-411 ..................................................... 295-300 vols. 486-487 ..................................................... 359-361 vols. 495-502 ....................................................
  • The Aboriginal Vote in 2000

    The Aboriginal Vote in 2000

    The Aboriginal Vote in 2000 Achieving an equitable position for Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian society Summary of Results ✔ 8 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations of 10,000 or more. ✔ 29 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations of 5,000 or more. ✔ 45 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations in excess of 5% of total vote. ✔ In 22 ridings, the size of the Aboriginal vote exceeded margin of victory in the last election. Note: The data contained in the following is based on Statistics Canada special runs. Population numbers represent eligible voters. The figures underestimate population by at least 18%. Regional Distribution Aboriginal People account for 8.9% of all voters in Manitoba, 8.0% of the vote in Saskatchewan, 4.9% of voters in Alberta and 4.4% in British Columbia. In the North, Aboriginal People represent 56.7% of the electorate in the Northwest Territories, 21% in the Yukon, and 19.9% in Labrador. In northwestern Ontario and northwestern Quebec, they form close to 20% of the voting populations. Aboriginal Voting Strength by Province REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF VOTING AGE POPULATION, 2000 TOTAL VOTING ABORIGINAL ABORIGINAL REGION POPULATION VOTE VOTE AS % # % # % OF TOTAL Newfoundland 465,075 2.1% 9,185 1.3% 2.0% Prince Edward Island 104,690 0.5% 1,270 0.2% 1.2% Nova Scotia 743,810 3.3% 15,335 2.2% 2.1% New Brunswick 597,340 2.7% 9,250 1.3% 1.6% Quebec 5,720,120 25.5% 103,770 14.8% 1.8% Ontario 8,315,000 37.1% 175,855 25.0% 2.1% Manitoba 886,035 4.0% 79,070 11.2% 8.9% Saskatchewan 784,660 3.5% 62,405 8.9% 8.0% Alberta 2,027,965 9.0% 98,845 14.1% 4.9% British Columbia 2,711,735 12.1% 120,135 17.1% 4.4% Northwest Territories* 41,650 0.2% 23,615 3.4% 56.7% Yukon 22,025 0.1% 4,630 0.7% 21.0% TOTAL 22,420,105 100.0% 703,365 100.00% 3.1% SOURCE: Special Run on 1991 Census Database Nunavut statistics are included in the Northwest Territories data.
  • Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 116 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 11, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7131 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 11, 2003 The House met at 2 p.m. challenged clients received a donation from Sun Country Cable, a donation that will enable the centre to continue its work in our Prayers community. Sun Country Cable donated the building. This building is next to Kindale's existing facility and both properties will eventually lead to construction of a new centre. In the meantime, the Ï (1405) building will be used for training and respite suites. [English] I am proud to be part of a community that looks out for those less The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing fortunate. Charity does begin at home. O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre. *** [Editor's Note: Members sang the national anthem] [Translation] SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-CANADA STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would like to share some of my concerns about the recent decision [English] by Société Radio-Canada to cancel its late evening sports news. CHABAD Hon. Art Eggleton (York Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise to I am worried, because last year this crown corporation had also decided to stop broadcasting the Saturday night hockey games, La pay tribute to Chabad Lubavitch which is the world's largest network Soirée du hockey.
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally

    The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally

    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction

    The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction

    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
  • Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations Adam M. Dodek*

    Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations Adam M. Dodek*

    Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations Adam M. Dodek Over the past decade, the use of au cOurs de la dernière décennie, le omnibus bills has become routine in the recours à des projets de lois omnibus Parliament of Canada. Omnibus budget est devenu une sorte de routine au sein implementation bills have grown in size du Parlement du Canada. Les projets to several hundred pages and acquired de lois omnibus d’exécution du budget their own political term with a decid- n’ont cessé de voir leur nombre de pages edly negative connotation: “omnibudget grossir au point d’atteindre plusieurs bills”. These omnibus and omnibudget centaines et on a même fini par les qua- bills have been a source of controversy lifier, avec toute la connotation politique and, at times, political protest. In its 2015 négative que cela suppose, de « projets 2017 CanLIIDocs 131 election platform, the Liberal Party of de lois omnibudget ». Ces projets de Canada promised to change the House lois omnibus et projets de lois omni- of Commons’ Standing Orders to end budget ont fait l’objet de controverses, the “undemocratic practice” of using voire parfois, de protestations politiques. omnibus bills. This article analyses Dans son programme électoral de 2015, the understanding, use, and history of le Parti libéral du Canada promettait de omnibus bills in the Parliament of Can- modifier le Règlement de la Chambre ada. It argues that such bills undermine des communes dans le but de mettre fin parliamentarians’ ability to responsibly à cette « pratique antidémocratique » and effectively carry out their duties to que représente le recours à des projets examine and debate legislation.
  • Time Allocation in the House of Commons T

    Time Allocation in the House of Commons T

    Silencing Parliamentary Democracy or Effective Time Management? Time Allocation in the House of Commons by Yves Yvon J. Pelletier 2000 CanLIIDocs 228 Is "time allocation" the best means by which to silence the opposition or does it allow rather for effective time management in the House of Commons? In 1969, the Trudeau government adopted, not without a vigorous reaction from opposition parties, a new procedure that allotted a certain period of time for a debate, reducing the use of closure. Despite promises that this measure would never be used, 150 time allocation motions were adopted by the House of Commons since December 1971. This article analyses the context in which time allocation was adopted and determines which government has used it most often. he centralization of political powers in the hands of of time could be allocated for debate. The partisan Tsenior management within the office of the Prime position when this measure was adopted did not prevent Minister and the central agencies of the federal its use by all federal govemments since 1971, on 163 government cannot alone account for the reduction in the occasions. This article examines the decline of the legislative role of Canadian Parliamentarians. In fact, legislative role of MPs as the result of time allocation and changes to the Standing Orders of the House of determines which government, from Trudeau to Commons by its members over the years have limited the Chrétien, have made most frequent use of it in terms of opportunities of private members to influence the final the number of seats held by the government, sitting days wording of government bills.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
  • Thursday, May 7, 1998

    Thursday, May 7, 1998

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 101 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, May 7, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6631 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, May 7, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. Committee on Procedure and House Affairs regarding the member- ship of the Standing Committee on Transport. _______________ If the House gives its consent, I intend to move concurrence in Prayers the 32nd report later this day. _______________ * * * [Translation] ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS ROYAL CANADIAN MINT ACT D (1000) Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Minister of Public Works and Gov- [Translation] ernment Services, Lib.) moved for leave to introduce Bill C-41, an act to amend the Royal Canadian Mint Act and the Currency GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Act. Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in * * * both official languages, the government’s response to two peti- tions. [English] * * * INDIAN ACT Mr. Jim Hart (Okanagan—Coquihalla, Ref.) moved for leave COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE to introduce Bill C-402, an act to amend the Indian Act (obligations ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT of landlords and tenants on reserve land). Mr. Guy St-Julien (Abitibi, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the He said: Mr. Speaker, I rise on behalf of the constituents of honour to present, in both official languages, the third report of the Okanagan—Coquihalla to introduce my private member’s bill Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Develop- entitled an act to amend the Indian Act, obligations of landlords ment.
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)

    Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
  • Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO

    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO

    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MICKY GRANGER Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 MOTION RECORD OF THE PLAINTIFF (CERTIFICATION) (Returnable November 27 & 28, 2019) VOLUME II of II March 18, 2019 GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 Toronto ON M5G 2C2 Jody Brown LS# 58844D Tel: 416-979-4251 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Geetha Philipupillai LS# 74741S Tel.: 416-979-4252 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff - 2 TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT - OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Crown Law Office – Civil Law 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor Toronto, ON, M5G 2K1 Amy Leamen LS#: 49351R Tel: 416.326.4153 / Fax: 416.326.4181 Lawyers for the Defendant TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB DESCRIPTION PG # 1. Notice of Motion (Returnable November 27 and 28, 2019) 1 A. Appendix “A” – List of Common Issues 6 2. Affidavit of Micky Granger (Unsworn) 8 3. Affidavit of Tanya Atherfold-Desilva sworn March 18, 2019 12 A. Exhibit “A”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – 20 Systemic Review Report dated July 2016 B. Exhibit “B”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director - 126 Executive Summary and Recommendations dated July 2016 C. Exhibit “C”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – Terms of 142 Reference as of March 2019 D. Exhibit “D”: Affidavit of David D.J. Truax sworn August 30, 2016 146 E. Exhibit “E”: Centre of Forensic Investigators & Submitters Technical 155 Information Sheets effective April 2, 2015 F.
  • The Rise and Decline of the Cooperative Commonwealth

    The Rise and Decline of the Cooperative Commonwealth

    THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies B. A. State University of New York at Potsdam, 1987 M. A. State University of New York at Empire State, 2005 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine December 2019 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Nathan Godfried, Professor of History Stephen Miller, Professor of History Howard Cody, Professor Emeritus of Political Science Copyright 2019 Charles A. Deshaies All Rights Reserved ii THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Scott See and Dr. Jacques Ferland An Abstract of the Thesis Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) December 2019 The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was one of the most influential political parties in Canadian history. Without doubt, from a social welfare perspective, the CCF helped build and develop an extensive social welfare system across Canada. It has been justly credited with being one of the major influences over Canadian social welfare policy during the critical years following the Great Depression. This was especially true of the period of the Second World War when the federal Liberal government of Mackenzie King adroitly borrowed CCF policy planks to remove the harsh edges of capitalism and put Canada on the path to a modern Welfare State.