DOCSLIB.ORG

Internet Crimes and Children

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Internet Crimes and Children I NTE GRI TY Q UALIT Y S ER VIC E INFORMANTINFORMANT The magazine for professionals who support the prevention, investigation, and prosecution of economic and high-tech crime VOL. 2, NO. 2, JULY - OCTOBER 2006 Crime Spotlight: Internet Crimes and Children New Training Courses Coming Soon! Inside the Mind of a White Collar Crook www.nw3c.org ACFS Full Page ad 3/22/06 6:25 PM Page 1 33 Days,Days, 33 Tracks,Tracks, 30+30+ SessionsSessions ACFS 7th National Fraud Conference September 26–28, 2006 San Francisco, California Holiday Inn Golden Gateway Join anti-fraud professionals from the private and public sectors as they exchange ideas, learn and explore essential strategies to combat financial crimes at the ACFS’ largest national training event. This conference will Join the ACFS include presentations on: ACFS • Internal Fraud • Low-cost training • Financial Elder Abuse • Publications • Forensic Auditing • Information • Following the Money Trail • Networking and Discussion Board • Investigating Identity Theft • Skills Certification • Cybercrimes, Occupational Fraud, New Pyramid Schemes and More! The ACFS currently offers a grandfathering provision which, for Join the ACFS in scenic San Francisco and earn up anti-fraud professionals with more to 24 accredited CPE or 21 MCLE hours at a single than 8 years of experience, eliminates the need to take our written exam. event. The ACFS is an approved NASBA, MCLE and For established pros, the certification POST training provider. To get the full conference process is easier than you think! program, register or obtain information on training Learn more at www.acfsnet.org accreditation, visit http://conference.acfsnet.org ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED FRAUD SPECIALISTS (ACFS) P.O. Box 13070 • Sacramento, CA 95813 • (804) 320-1947 • www.acfsnet.org CONTENTS VOL. 2, No. 2, JULY - OCTOBER 2006 NW3C BOARD FeatuRE ARTICLES OF Directors 4 New Members Welcome Chairman Glen B. Gainer III 6 Members Corner Vice Chairman 7 Board of Directors Spotlight: Paul Cordia Brian Flood 8 Training: Course Descriptions and Schedule Secretary Christopher Cotta 16 Instructor Spotlight: Dave McLaughlin Treasurer 18 Crime Spotlight: Internet Crimes and Children Paul Cordia • ICAC Task Forces: Protecting our Children Online • The Power of Information • Safety Tips REGions Great Lakes: • Acronyms to Know Philip Rosenthal 28 Con Artist Psyche: Midwest: Inside the Mind of a White Collar Crook Paul Cordia 30 IC3 (Internet Crime Complaint Center) Alerts Mountain: Kathleen Kempley 34 NW3C Member Highlights Northeast: 38 NW3C News: Open House, Focus Groups Held in 2006 Christopher Cotta 40 2006 Outreach Seminars South Central: Brian Flood Southeast: Michael Brown West: Michael Stevenson editorial staff courtney tan • lee dail • april tillar • laura kenny • cam brandon • loreal bond This publication is produced with the support of grant #2006-MU-MU-K002, awarded by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs. The Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, coordinates the activities of the following program offices and bureaus: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view in this newsletter are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C) is the copyright owner of the Informant. This information may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the NW3C. This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. For additional information, please contact Courtney Tan in the Communications Department at [email protected]. ©2006. NW3C, Inc. d/b/a the National White Collar Crime Center. All rights reserved. West Virginia Department of Education, WV Madison County Sheriff’s Office, MT NW3CNW3C West Virginia Division of Corrections, WV Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, NM WelcomesWelcomes MIDWEST WEST Beaver Dam Police Department, WI California State University Police Department-San Luis Obispo, its Newest Members! Cambridge Police Department, MN CA Cassville Police Department, MO Camas Police Department, WA Corcoran Police Department, MN Nevada Department of Corrections, NV NW3C extends a warm welcome to the following agencies that became DuPage County State’s Attorney’s Office, IL North Las Vegas Police Department, NV members between April and July of 2006: Ellisville Police Department, MO Polk County Sheriff’s Office, OR Lamar Police Department, MO Santa Cruz County Sheriff-Coroner Office, CA Le Mars Police Department, IA Washington Department of Labor and Industries-Investigative Menasha Police Department, WI Unit, WA NORTHEAST Sidney Police Department, OH Nebraska Department of Justice, NE Washougal Police Department, WA Kennebec County Sheriff’s Office, ME Upper Allen Township Police Department, PA Phelps County Sheriff’s Office, NE Kennebunk Police Department, ME Washington County Sheriff’s Office, MD Shawano County Sheriff’s Department, WI Leicester Police Department, MA Wayne County Sheriff’s Office, IN Springfield Police Department, MO Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts Campus Police Stone County Sheriff’s Office, MO Department, MA Toulon Police Department, IL U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services Office, District of Maine, Woodbury Public Safety Department, MN internAtionAL ME Woodridge Police Department, IL Bundeswehr Operations Command J6, Germany Waterford Police Department, CT SOUTHEAST German Armed Forces Command USA/Canada, VA Worcester Police Department, MA Auburn Police Department, GA Bristol Virginia Police Department, VA Collier County Sheriff’s Office, FL Crisp County Sheriff’s Office, GA Dawson County Sheriff’s Office, GA SOUTH CENTRAL GREAT LAKES Horry County Police Department, SC Anderson County Criminal District Attorney’s Office, TX Auglaize County Sheriff’s Office, OH James City County Police Department, VA Benton County Sheriff’s Office, AR Edinburgh Police Department, IN Knox County Sheriff’s Office, TN Duncan Police Department, OK Forest Heights Police Department, MD Lake County Sheriff’s Office, FL Duncanville Police Department, TX Hazleton City Police Department, PA Paulding County Sheriff’s Office, GA Highland Park Independent School District Police Depart- Hobart Police Department, IN Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court, Internal Audit ment, TX Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office, NJ Division, FL Southaven Police Department, MS Lansdale Borough Police Department, PA Prosperity Police Department, SC University of North Texas Health Science Center Police Lawrence Police Department, IN Richmond Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, VA Department, TX Lebanon County District Attorney’s Office, PA Richmond Sheriff’s Office, VA Lorain Police Department, OH Roseboro Police Department, NC New York County District Attorney’s Office, NY Spartanburg County Sheriff’s Office, SC Newark Police Department, NY Stafford County Sheriff’s Office, VA Office of the Indiana Inspector General, IN Tallahassee Police Department, FL Point Township Police Department, PA Tennessee Department of Revenue/Special Investigations MOUNTAIN Pottsville Bureau of Police, PA Section, TN Broomfield Police Department, CO Shelby County Sheriff Department, IN University of Florida Police Department, FL Carbon County Sheriff’s Office, WY Membership Region Map 4 I N F orm A nt : M A R C H - J un E 2 0 0 6 www.nw3c.org 5 Welcome to Members Corner! We will address your general membership questions, provide you with the latest membership information, and welcome your suggestions for additional features. We hope you will find Members Corner interesting and informative. 1. How do I request Meet Regina Potis! membership information? Our Membership is Growing and so is our Go to NW3C’s public Web Member Services Staff site, nw3c.org, and select “Membership” on the left side egina joined the member services of the page. This menu provides an overview and the Rteam in the role of “Membership benefits of NW3C membership. To request membership Communications Specialist” at NW3C in information, select “Request Membership” and follow the ergeant Paul Cordia joined the NW3C Board of Directors in August of 2000, repre- June 2006. instructions to complete the form. senting the Midwest Region. For the past eight years Sergeant Cordia has supervised Sthe Computer Forensic Section for the Missouri State Highway Patrol. She comes to us from the Virginia Bar 2. My agency is a member of NW3C. How do I get a Association where, for the past eleven user name and password to access your Web site? According to Sgt.. Cordia, “NW3C continues to be the ‘go to’ place for training, case analysis years, she worked as the Membership and case funding,” pointing out that the Midwest Region has grown substantially in the last Coordinator and also as the Young Law- Contact your agency’s NW3C representative to ask several years, which in turn prompts more requests for training and support. yers Division Coordinator. for an account. If you do not know who your agency representative is, contact Member Services. In a recent interview, Sgt. Cordia talked about his experience with NW3C and fighting white Regina now serves as the point of con- collar crime. The following is a recap of that discussion: tact for agencies applying for member- 3. I am going to be changing jobs soon and need ship and helps to maintain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warrantless Workplace Searches of Government
    WARRANTLESS WORKPLACE within which the principles outlined in SEARCHES OF GOVERNMENT O’Connor for “workplace” searches by EMPLOYEES government supervisors can be understood and applied. In sum, when a government supervisor is considering the search of a Bryan R. Lemons government employee’s workspace, a two- Branch Chief part analysis can be utilized to simplify the process. First, determine whether the There are a variety of reasons why employee has a reasonable expectation of a government supervisor might wish to privacy in the area to be searched. If a search a government employee’s reasonable expectation of privacy does workplace. For example, a supervisor exist, then consider how that expectation might wish to conduct a search to locate a can be defeated.2 Before turning to those needed file or document; the supervisor issues, however, it is necessary to first might wish to search an employee’s define exactly what is meant by the term workplace to discover whether the “workplace.” employee is misusing government property, such as a government-owned DEFINING THE “WORKPLACE” computer; or, a supervisor might seek to search an employee’s workplace because “Workplace,” as used in this he has information that the employee is article, “includes those areas and items committing a crime, such as using the that are related to work and are generally Internet to download child pornography. within the employer’s control.”3 This would include such areas as offices, desks, In situations where a public filing cabinets, and computers. However, employer
    [Show full text]
  • Legal-Process Guidelines for Law Enforcement
    Legal Process Guidelines Government & Law Enforcement within the United States These guidelines are provided for use by government and law enforcement agencies within the United States when seeking information from Apple Inc. (“Apple”) about customers of Apple’s devices, products and services. Apple will update these Guidelines as necessary. All other requests for information regarding Apple customers, including customer questions about information disclosure, should be directed to https://www.apple.com/privacy/contact/. These Guidelines do not apply to requests made by government and law enforcement agencies outside the United States to Apple’s relevant local entities. For government and law enforcement information requests, Apple complies with the laws pertaining to global entities that control our data and we provide details as legally required. For all requests from government and law enforcement agencies within the United States for content, with the exception of emergency circumstances (defined in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 1986, as amended), Apple will only provide content in response to a search issued upon a showing of probable cause, or customer consent. All requests from government and law enforcement agencies outside of the United States for content, with the exception of emergency circumstances (defined below in Emergency Requests), must comply with applicable laws, including the United States Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). A request under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty or the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (“CLOUD Act”) is in compliance with ECPA. Apple will provide customer content, as it exists in the customer’s account, only in response to such legally valid process.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Do When You Are Served with a Search Warrant by Manny A
    AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION APRIL 2016 PRATT’S PRATT’S VOL. 2 • NO. 3 PRIVACY & CYBERSECURITY LAW CYBERSECURITY & PRIVACY PRATT’S PRIVACY & CYBERSECURITY REPORT LAW REPORT EDITOR’S NOTE: SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE! THE FTC, UNFAIR PRACTICES, AND Steven A. Meyerowitz CYBERSECURITY: TWO STEPS FORWARD, AND TWO STEPS BACK WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU ARE SERVED WITH A David Bender SEARCH WARRANT APRIL Manny A. Abascal and Robert E. Sims DRONES AT HOME: DHS PUBLISHES BEST PRACTICES FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY, CIVIL PRESIDENT OBAMA SIGNS CYBERSECURITY RIGHTS, AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN DOMESTIC 2016 ACT OF 2015 TO ENCOURAGE CYBERSECURITY UAS PROGRAMS INFORMATION SHARING Charles A. Blanchard, David J. Weiner, Kenneth L. Wainstein, Keith M. Gerver, Tom McSorley, and Elizabeth T.M. Fitzpatrick and Peter T. Carey VOL. VOL. A SKIMPY RISK ANALYSIS IS RISKY BUSINESS 2 FOR HIPAA COVERED ENTITIES AND • BUSINESS ASSOCIATES NO. Kimberly C. Metzger 3 What to Do When You Are Served With a Search Warrant By Manny A. Abascal and Robert E. Sims* Most business executives and officers lack the training and preparation to deal effec- tively with a search warrant. In order to protect privacy and other rights, this article sets forth the basic principles that should govern preparation for, and response to, a search warrant. State and federal law enforcement agencies continue to increase their investigation and prosecution of white collar crime, particularly relating to the securities and health- care industries. The search warrant has become a regular method authorities use to obtain evidence. Law enforcement officers executing a warrant typically arrive at corporate offices with no prior notice, armed with a search warrant entitling them to seize original business records, including computer records.
    [Show full text]
  • A Call from the Panopticon to the Judicial Chamber “Expect Privacy!”
    Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol.1, Issue 2 (2006) A Call From the Panopticon to the Judicial Chamber “Expect Privacy!” Julia Alpert Gladstone Bryant University Smithfield, RI,USA Abstract Privacy is necessary in order for one to develop physically, mentally and affectively. Autonomy and self definition have been recognized by the United States Supreme Court as being values of privacy. In our technologically advanced, and fear driven society, however, our right to privacy has been severely eroded. Due to encroachment by government and business we have a diminished expectation of privacy. This article examines the detriments to self and society which result from a reduced sphere of privacy, as well as offering a modest suggestion for a method to reintroduce an improved conception of privacy into citizens’ lives. Keywords: Privacy, Technology, Judiciary, Autonomy, Statute INTRODUCTION Citizens often pay scant attention to their privacy rights until a consciousness raising event, such as the late 2005 exposure of the unauthorized wiretapping performed by the United States Executive Branch, heightens their interest and concern to protect previously dormant privacy rights. The scholarly literature on privacy is plentiful which broadly explains privacy as a liberty or property right, or a condition of inner awareness, and explanations of invasions of privacy are also relevant. This article seeks to explain why privacy remains under prioritized in most people’s lives, and yet, privacy is held as a critical, if not, fundamental right. Privacy is defined according to social constructs that evolve with time, but it is valued, differently. It is valued as a means to control one’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Search Warrants: Informants Jeff Welty UNC School of Government October 2018
    Search Warrants: Informants Jeff Welty UNC School of Government October 2018 Objectives • Be able to categorize sources of information accurately as officers, citizens, confidential informants, or anonymous tipsters. • Know the legal tests for when information from each type of source is sufficient to provide probable cause. • Know the legal rules regarding staleness of information. • Be able to apply the above knowledge in the context of actual search warrant applications. Most Search Warrant Cases Involve Informants • “Studies in Atlanta, Boston, San Diego, and Cleveland [found] that 92 percent of the 1,200 federal warrants issued in those cities relied on an informant.” • Alexandra Natapoff, Snitching: The Institutional and Communal Consequences, 73 U. Cin. L. Rev. 645 (2004) • What fraction of your search warrant cases involve informants? 1 It Is OK for Officers to Rely on Information from Others • “The affidavit may be based on hearsay information and need not reflect the direct personal observations of the affiant.” • State v. Campbell, 282 N.C. 185 (1972) Categories of Sources Officers and Citizens Confidential Informants Anonymous Tipsters 2 Information from Other Officers • “[I]t is well‐established that where the named informant is a police officer, his reliability will be presumed.” • State v. Caldwell, 53 N.C. App. 1 (1981) • Does this presumption of reliability make sense? • Are there circumstances where you would not presume the reliability of information from another officer? • Even if it is reliable, it won’t always provide probable cause • Limited information • Conclusory information • Stale information • Poor basis of knowledge Information from Victims and Other Citizens • “The fact that [the citizen informant] was named and identified .
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Amendment Remedies As Rights: the Warrant Requirement
    FOURTH AMENDMENT REMEDIES AS RIGHTS: THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT DAVID GRAY* INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 426 I. THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT AND ITS CRITICS ................................ 433 II. MIRANDA AND THE CONCEPT OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES ........... 436 III. FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES ........ 443 A. “The right of the people . .” ...................................................... 444 B. “. to be secure . .” ................................................................. 457 C. “. shall not be violated.” ......................................................... 460 IV. THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT AS A CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY ....... 464 A. Our Adaptable Fourth Amendment ............................................. 464 B. An Emerging Threat: The Advent of Professional Law Enforcement ................................................................................. 469 C. A Constitutional Response to the Emerging Threat..................... 473 V. A REMEDIES-AS-RIGHTS AGENDA FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ............... 481 The constitutional status of the warrant requirement is hotly debated. Critics argue that neither the text nor history of the Fourth Amendment supports a warrant requirement. Critics also question the warrant requirement’s ability to protect Fourth Amendment interests. Perhaps in response to these concerns, the Supreme Court has steadily degraded the warrant requirement through a series of widening exceptions. The result
    [Show full text]
  • 183 Poses a Greater Threat to the Exclusionary Rule Than the Past Decisions That Limited Its Application. First, the Court's
    2006] THE SUPREME COURT — LEADING CASES 183 poses a greater threat to the exclusionary rule than the past decisions that limited its application. First, the Court’s two newest Justices joined the majority opinion in full.79 Second, the majority was willing to bar the application of the exclusionary rule without regard to its de- terrent effect.80 Finally, the majority’s emphasis on changed circum- stances — the expansion of § 1983 and internal police discipline — could justify overruling Mapp.81 It remains to be seen how far the Court will go, but Hudson is a strong signal that the exclusionary rule is in trouble. 6. Fourth Amendment — Suspicionless Search of Parolees. — In 1787, Jeremy Bentham argued that the ideal prison would consist of cellblocks encircling an interior opaque column from which wardens and guards could monitor prisoners without themselves being seen.1 Because the prisoners would not know when the wardens were watch- ing them from inside the column, Bentham surmised that the prisoners would attempt to conform their behavior to acceptable standards at all times.2 Although Bentham’s Panopticon has met with considerable criticism,3 his core idea — that supervision, real or imagined, can deter ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 79 In another case from last Term, the new Chief Justice noted that “the exclusionary rule is not a remedy we apply lightly” in view of its social costs and declined to apply the rule to viola- tions of the right of foreign nationals under the Vienna Convention of Consular Relations to con- sular notification of their arrest or detention. Sanchez-Llamas v.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT of IOWA EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. 19-CR-1004-CJW vs. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BRANDON JAMES SEYS, ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE, MOTION Defendant. TO QUASH SEARCH WARRANTS AND SUPPRESS EVIDENCE, SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS, AND MOTION TO DISMISS ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 3 II. FINDINGS OF FACT ..................................................................... 4 A. Search Conducted Via GPS Mobile Tracking Devices Affixed to Two Vehicles Beginning December 5 and 6, 2018 ................................. 4 B. December 30, 2018 Search of the Storage Unit at Alt’s Mini Storage in Dubuque, Iowa ...................................................................... 8 C. December 30, 2018 Search of the Silver Cadillac ............................ 9 D. December 30, 2018 Search of Room 242 in the Hilton Garden Inn, Dubuque, Iowa .....................................................................10 E. December 30, 2018 Search of 740 Boyer Street .............................14 Case 2:19-cr-01004-CJW-MAR Document 86 Filed 10/08/19 Page 1 of 56 III. ANALYSIS .................................................................................14 A. Defendant’s Motion to Quash Search Warrants and Suppress Evidence .............................................................................14 1. Standard of Review for Determining Whether
    [Show full text]
  • Search Warrants -- Force, Detention, and Arrest
    Colorado Springs Police Department General Order 743 Section 7: Search Warrants -- Force, Detention, and Arrest Active Date: 6/26/2017 Supersedes Date: 1/9/2013 .1 Purpose To specify procedures for obtaining and executing search warrants. .2 Cross Reference GO 740, Determining Probable Cause GO 330, Damage to Non-Police Property GO 880, Deconfliction GO 1330, Ride-Along Program SOP P1-166, Search Warrant Checklist SOP M1-33, Raid Procedures SOP M1-02, Handling of Affidavits for 41.1 Orders: Search and Arrest Warrants SOP M1-16, Electronic Warrants SOP I2-02, Handling of Affidavits for 41.1 Orders Search and Arrest Warrants SOP I1-17, Fax Warrants .3 Discussion The nucleus of the Fourth Amendment is the warrant requirement and the essence of the warrant requirement is probable cause. A search warrant must be obtained to search areas where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g. a home) unless a recognized exception to the warrant requirement exists. Note: Colorado law pertaining to arrests, searches, and seizures is contained in Article 3, Title 16, of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The present General Order provides guidance for implementing its provisions concerning searches, but familiarity with the applicable statutes is essential. Every sworn member of the Department, regardless of present assignment, is expected to know the provisions of that Article thoroughly. .4 Policy The Colorado Springs Police Department will exercise utmost care to respect personal and property rights by following carefully-defined procedures in obtaining and executing all search warrants. Execution will be carried out thoroughly and vigorously, but with the minimum of force necessary to fulfill legitimate police purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Amendment Concerns Raised by Law Enforcement's Warrantless Use of GPS and Cellular Phone Tracking
    \\server05\productn\M\MIA\64-3\MIA309.txt unknown Seq: 1 23-APR-10 11:09 NOTES Warranting a Warrant: Fourth Amendment Concerns Raised by Law Enforcement’s Warrantless Use of GPS and Cellular Phone Tracking ADAM KOPPEL† The Fourth Amendment does, of course, leave room for the employment of modern technology in criminal law enforcement, but . electronic monitoring, subject only to the self-restraint of law enforcement officials, has no place in our society. —Justice John Harlan II* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1062 R II. TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW: THE TECHNOLOGICAL BASIS OF TRACKING AND POSSIBLE LAW ENFORCEMENT USES ....................... 1063 R A. GPS Tracking Devices ............................................ 1063 R B. Cellular Phone Site Location ...................................... 1066 R III. THE SUPREME COURT’S FRAMEWORK OF FOURTH AMENDMENT ANALYSIS FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND THE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY DOCTRINE .......................................................... 1069 R IV. THE CURRENT COURTS ARE SPLIT ON THE LEGALITY OF WARRANTLESS POLICE USE OF BOTH GPS DEVICES AND CELLULAR PHONE TRACKING .............. 1072 R A. Some Courts Have Held that a Warrant Is Necessary for Police to Engage in GPS Tracking Due to the Intrusive Nature of this Technology that Goes Beyond Mere Sense-augmented Surveillance .......................... 1073 R B. Some Courts Have Held that Warrantless GPS Tracking is Constitutional, as the Level of Intrusiveness Raises No Fourth Amendment Concerns .... 1077 R C. The Statutory Debate over Governmental Access to Prospective, Real-time Cellular Phone Site Information .................................... 1079 R 1. SOME COURTS HAVE HELD THAT A PROBABLE CAUSE SHOWING IS REQUIRED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TO OBTAIN CELLULAR LOCATION INFORMATION FROM SERVICE PROVIDERS .......................... 1080 R 2. SOME COURTS HAVE HELD THAT A BURDEN OF SPECIFIC AND ARTICULABLE FACTS IS REQUIRED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TO OBTAIN CELLULAR LOCATION INFORMATION FROM SERVICE PROVIDERS .......
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth Amendment in the Roberts Court
    St. John's Law Review Volume 93 Number 1 Volume 93, 2019, Number 1 Article 4 A Warrant Requirement Resurgence? The Fourth Amendment in the Roberts Court Benjamin J. Priester Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A WARRANT REQUIREMENT RESURGENCE? THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IN THE ROBERTS COURT † BENJAMIN J. PRIESTER INTRODUCTION Over many years, the United States Supreme Court has developed an extensive body of precedent interpreting and enforcing the provisions of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement agents conducting criminal investigations. Commonly called the “warrant requirement,” one key component of this case law operates to deem some police investigatory techniques to be unconstitutional unless they are conducted pursuant to a search warrant issued in advance by a judge. The terms of the doctrine and its exceptions also authorize other investigatory actions as constitutionally permissible without a search warrant. The doctrinal framework created by the warrant requirement serves as a core foundational principle of the Court’s constitutional criminal procedure for police investigations. The conventional wisdom about the warrant requirement suggests that over the last half-century, the Court has moved from rigorously interpreting and enforcing the doctrine to reducing its importance and recognizing more exceptions for permissible warrantless searches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Picture View of Anonymous Tips from Ordinary People
    Touro Law Review Volume 32 Number 4 Article 8 2016 The Big Picture View of Anonymous Tips from Ordinary People Amanda M. Dadiego Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Fourth Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Dadiego, Amanda M. (2016) "The Big Picture View of Anonymous Tips from Ordinary People," Touro Law Review: Vol. 32 : No. 4 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol32/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dadiego: The Big Picture THE BIG PICTURE VIEW OF ANONYMOUS TIPS FROM ORDINARY PEOPLE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK People v. Argyris1 (decided November 25, 2014) I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Amendment guarantees “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons . against unreasonable searches and seizures.”2 The purpose is to protect individuals from being searched or arrested based upon mere suspicion or a rumor.3 A search or sei- zure is reasonable, and therefore constitutional, when law enforce- ment has reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Courts throughout the country have been faced with the issue of whether anonymous tips that lead police to conduct a “stop and frisk” could be deemed constitutional.4 Anonymous tips can create a cause for concern when the informant uses law enforcement in an attempt to harass, black- mail, or embarrass a potential defendant.
    [Show full text]