DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia United States In cooperation with Department of West Virginia Agricultural Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Soil Survey of Station and West Virginia Natural Conservation Agency Logan and Resources Conservation Service Mingo Counties, West Virginia Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. i Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2002. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2003. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2003. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the West Virginia Conservation Agency. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Guyan Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, or political beliefs; as a means of reprisal; or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 800-795-3272 (voice) or 202-720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Williamson, West Virginia, along Tug Fork in Mingo County. Udorthents-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, is in the foreground; Highsplint-Urban land complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony, is on the footslopes; and Matewan-Highsplint-Guyandotte association, very steep, extremely stony, is in the background. Note the floodwall that protects Williamson from rare episodes of flooding. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. ii Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia Contents How To Use This Soil Survey.......................................................................................i Foreword .................................................................................................................... vii General Nature of the Survey Area ............................................................................. 1 Settlement and Population ....................................................................................... 1 Farming .................................................................................................................... 2 Transportation and Industry ..................................................................................... 2 Geology ................................................................................................................... 3 Relief and Drainage ................................................................................................. 3 Climate..................................................................................................................... 4 How This Survey Was Made ........................................................................................ 4 General Soil Map Units .............................................................................................. 7 1. Matewan-Highsplint-Guyandotte ....................................................................... 7 2. Matewan-Pineville-Guyandotte ......................................................................... 8 3. Pineville-Berks ................................................................................................ 10 4. Berks-Shelocta ................................................................................................ 10 5. Highsplint-Matewan-Cloverlick ........................................................................ 11 6. Urban land-Udorthents-Craigsville.................................................................. 11 Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................................................................... 13 AbB—Allegheny loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes ........................................................ 14 BrG—Berks-Rock outcrop complex, extremely steep, extremely stony ................ 16 BSF—Berks-Shelocta association, very steep, extremely stony ........................... 18 Ch—Chavies fine sandy loam ............................................................................... 20 Ck—Chavies fine sandy loam, protected .............................................................. 22 Cr—Craigsville very gravelly sandy loam .............................................................. 23 FkC—Fiveblock and Kaymine soils, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony ...... 25 FkF—Fiveblock and Kaymine soils, 35 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony ..... 27 GmE—Gilpin-Matewan complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony.................. 30 Gw—Grigsby loam................................................................................................. 32 HgE—Highsplint channery loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony ................. 33 HMF—Highsplint-Matewan-Cloverlick association, very steep, extremely stony ................................................................................................................ 35 HuE—Highsplint-Urban land complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony ......... 37 ImF—Itmann extremely channery sandy loam, very steep ................................... 39 KcF—Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, very steep, extremely stony ....... 40 KfB—Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony ......... 43 KfF—Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony ..... 45 KrF—Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony ..................... 47 LmE—Lily-Matewan complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony ...................... 49 MHF—Matewan-Highsplint-Guyandotte association, very steep, extremely stony ................................................................................................................ 51 MnE—Matewan-Latham complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes .................................. 53 MPF—Matewan-Pineville-Guyandotte association, very steep, extremely stony ................................................................................................................ 55 PBF—Pineville-Berks association, very steep, extremely stony ........................... 58 iii Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia PnE—Pineville-Lily complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony ........................ 60 SbB—Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes.................................................... 62 SeB—Sensabaugh-Lobdell loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes ..................................... 64 Ua—Udorthents, earthen dam .............................................................................. 66 Ub—Udorthents, smoothed ................................................................................... 67 UcB—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes.............................. 69 Ud—Urban land-Chavies complex ........................................................................ 70 Uf—Urban land-Chavies complex, protected .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of the Indiana Lenape
    IN SEARCH OF THE INDIANA LENAPE: A PREDICTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE LENAPE LIVING ALONG THE WHITE RIVER IN INDIANA FROM 1790 - 1821 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY JESSICA L. YANN DR. RONALD HICKS, CHAIR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA DECEMBER 2009 Table of Contents Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Research Goals ............................................................................................................................ 1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 2: Theory and Methods ................................................................................................. 6 Explaining Contact and Its Material Remains ............................................................................. 6 Predicting the Intensity of Change and its Effects on Identity................................................... 14 Change and the Lenape .............................................................................................................. 16 Methods ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Muhlenberg County Heritage Volume 6, Number 1
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Muhlenberg County Heritage Kentucky Library - Serials 3-1984 Muhlenberg County Heritage Volume 6, Number 1 Kentucky Library Research Collections Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/muhlenberg_cty_heritage Part of the Genealogy Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Muhlenberg County Heritage by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MUHLENBERG COUNTY HERITAGE ·' P.UBLISHED QUARTERLY THE MUHLENBERG COUNTY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY, CENTRAL CITY LIBRARY BROAD STREET, CENTRAL CITY, KY. 42J30 VOL. 6, NO. 1 Jan., Feb., Mar., 1984 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ During the four weeks of November and first week of December, 1906, Mr. R. T. Martin published a series of articles in The Record, a Greenville newspaper, which he titled PIONEERS. Beginning with this issue of The Heritage, we will reprint those articles, but may not follow the 5-parts exactly, for we will be combining some articles in whole or part, because of space requirements. For the most part Mr. Martin's wording will be followed exactly, but some punctuation, or other minor matters, may be altered. In a few instances questionable items are followed by possible corrections in parentheses. It is believed you will find these articles of interest and perhaps of value to many of our readers. PIONEERS Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers, many of them, came to Kentucky over a cen­ tury a~o; Virginia is said to be the mother state.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident at Tulpehocken
    INCIDENT AT TULPEHOCKEN BY FRANCIS JENNINGS N 1712 Secretary James Logan became, for all practical * purposes, the most powerful man in Pennsylvania. William 'enn had mortgaged the province to a group of English Quakers owho assumed a receivership over Penn's real estate and appointed ILogan as their resident agent. Penn himself made Logan a trustee of his will and Commissioner of Property. With these three legal powers, he acted almost as a dictator in the allotting, surveying, and patenting of Penn's lands. Besides his controls over property, Logan dominated the Council of the province; and 1)y means of his majority in the Council, he maintained a check on the actions of successive Lieutenant Governors. These Gov- ernors appointed all of the judiciary, and Logan's nominees usually received their favorable attention. Except for a period during the administration of Governor William Keith, only the provincial assembly-the House of Representatives-resisted Logan's absolute sway with any real effectiveness. In 1712 William Penn suffered a series of strokes that disabled him; and his second wife, Hannah, became absolutely dependent on Logan to defend the interests of her family against a throng of encroachers. Lord Baltimore claimed a broad strip of land along the entire Pennsylvania-Maryland border. The Earl of Sutherland petitioned the Crown in 1716 for a grant of the Penns' three ILower Counties of Delaware, where Lord Baltimore also main- tained harassing action of various kinds. On Penn's death in l718, his Anglican son by his first wife attempted to break his ill and seize the province from his Quaker sons by his second wife.
    [Show full text]
  • A Native History of Kentucky
    A Native History Of Kentucky by A. Gwynn Henderson and David Pollack Selections from Chapter 17: Kentucky in Native America: A State-by-State Historical Encyclopedia edited by Daniel S. Murphree Volume 1, pages 393-440 Greenwood Press, Santa Barbara, CA. 2012 1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW As currently understood, American Indian history in Kentucky is over eleven thousand years long. Events that took place before recorded history are lost to time. With the advent of recorded history, some events played out on an international stage, as in the mid-1700s during the war between the French and English for control of the Ohio Valley region. Others took place on a national stage, as during the Removal years of the early 1800s, or during the events surrounding the looting and grave desecration at Slack Farm in Union County in the late 1980s. Over these millennia, a variety of American Indian groups have contributed their stories to Kentucky’s historical narrative. Some names are familiar ones; others are not. Some groups have deep historical roots in the state; others are relative newcomers. All have contributed and are contributing to Kentucky's American Indian history. The bulk of Kentucky’s American Indian history is written within the Commonwealth’s rich archaeological record: thousands of camps, villages, and town sites; caves and rockshelters; and earthen and stone mounds and geometric earthworks. After the mid-eighteenth century arrival of Europeans in the state, part of Kentucky’s American Indian history can be found in the newcomers’ journals, diaries, letters, and maps, although the native voices are more difficult to hear.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Fallen Timbers and the Treaty of Fort Greeneville
    A Thesis Entitled The Battle of Fallen Timbers and the Treaty of Fort Greeneville: Why Did Anthony Wayne Win Both and Could He Have Lost? By Bryce Dixon Blair Jr. Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Liberal Studies ____________________ Advisor: Dr. Alfred Cave ____________________ Committee Member: Dr. Michael Jakobson ____________________ Graduate School The University of Toledo May 2005 Acknowledgements This thesis project would have forever remained an uncompleted enigma without crucial support and assistance from several people. My first and most heartfelt thanks go to my wife, Cherie. She worked even harder as almost a single parent during the long hours of reading, research, and writing that quite often kept me away from the family. She left me alone when I needed privacy and solitude and she prodded me to varying degrees when I needed greater focus and motivation. She has also been my invaluable technical advisor for the art of computer science. Though they are too young to appreciate this now, I thank my two young children, Bryce and Eryn, for accepting an absent Dad at times. They provided me with love and attention and much needed respites from academic pursuits. I thank my parents, Bryce and Eleanor, who have always placed a strong emphasis on intelligence and education by example but have done so without judgement. My mother lent me a copy of James Thom’s Panther In The Sky about a dozen years ago and this helped to rejuvenate my interest in this historical era. Special credit is due my thesis committee: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Kentucky Mounted Militia in the Indian Wars from 1768 to 1841
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 Conquerors or cowards: the role of the Kentucky mounted militia in the Indian wars from 1768 to 1841. Joel Anderson University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Joel, "Conquerors or cowards: the role of the Kentucky mounted militia in the Indian wars from 1768 to 1841." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3083. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3083 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONQUERORS OR COWARDS: THE ROLE OF THE KENTUCKY MOUNTED MILITIA IN THE INDIAN WARS FROM 1768 TO 1841 By Joel Anderson B.S. Indiana University Southeast, 2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Art in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2018 CONQUERORS OR COWARDS: THE ROLE OF THE KENTUCKY MOUNTED MILITIA IN THE INDIAN WARS FROM 1768 to 1813 By Joel Anderson B.A., Indiana University Southeast, 2011 A Thesis Approved on November 6, 2018 by the following Thesis Committee: ______________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the City of Logan, W. Va. [West Virginia], 1823-1916
    A HISTORY 23 £29 city of LoGAN,y,vA. 1823-1916 Compiled by ~G.T.Swa1n Logan,W.Va. 1916 momnmma Bird’seye View of Logan. Residence of Don Chafin, Sheriff of Logan County. d (3 math in the afiuhlit It has been possible, only through the patronage of the business men of Logan county, for us to have this book pub­ lished. While the majority willingly and freely :_;aveus their patronage and assistance, thereby assisting‘ in this Work, some few were not interested in the work. It is in return for the favors shown the author by the advertisers herein contained, that we are asking "in their behalf that every reader of this book read carefully each and every ad­ vertisement to be found between the covers of this book. Look the advertisements over carefully before leaving your home;for a shopping trip, jot down the nameand address of the different business establishments to be found herein, and call upon them and give them a share of your patron­ age. You will find them courteous, kind and accomodating, and pleased to have you call. They are ‘gladto make your acquaintance and invite you to call even‘if you do not make a purchase. » Logan is noted for its kind and sociable people and we believe that she obtained her notoriety through her accom­ modating business men. We ask you. to give these‘ firms a share of your pat- I ronage and we rest assured that you "willreceive satisfac­ tion from each and every one Of ‘Chem­ ’ . THE AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution's First Declared War: The
    COPYRIGHT © 2021 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION THE CONSTITUTION’S FIRST DECLARED WAR: THE NORTHWESTERN CONFEDERACY WAR OF 1790–95 William Hall & Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash* What counts as the first presidential war—the practice of Presidents waging war without prior congressional sanction? In the wake of President Donald Trump’s attacks on Syria, the Office of Legal Counsel opined that unilateral presidential war-making dates back 230 years, to George Washington. The Office claimed that the first President waged war against Native American tribes in the Northwest Territory without first securing congressional authorization. If true, executive war-making has a pedigree as old as the Constitution itself. Grounded in a systematic review of congressional laws, executive correspondence, and rich context of the era, this Article evaluates the claim that our first President waged war in reliance upon his constitutional authority. In fact, there is little that supports the bold claim. Congress authorized war against Northwestern tribes raiding frontier settlements. In other words, Congress exercised its power to declare war and did, in fact, declare war, albeit without using that phrase. Moreover, Washington and his cabinet repeatedly disclaimed any constitutional power to wage war without congressional sanction, making it exceedingly unlikely that he waged war of his own accord or in sole reliance on his constitutional powers. Washington’s abjurations of power should make executive-branch lawyers blush, for the Commander in Chief and his celebrated advisors, including Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and Henry Knox, consistently observed that Presidents could not take the nation to war and, therefore, could not sanction offensive measures, including attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shawnees, Cornstalk and the Kerrs Creek Massacres 2 As Well As of the Various Miami and Wabash Tribes, Joined Them
    Th Shawnees Coweshal and th Kerrs Creek Massacre 1 western boundary at the peace. We won from them vast stretches of territory be- cause we had beaten their warriors, and we could not have won it otherwise; where- as the territory of the Iroquois was lost not because of their defeat, but because of the defeat of the British. There were two groups of these Indians, corresponding roughly with the ge- ographic division. In the northwest, between the Ohio and the Lakes, were the Algonquin tribes, generally banded loosely together; in the southwest, between the Tennessee — then called the Cherokee — and the Gulf, the so-called Appalachians lived. Between them lay a vast and beautiful region where no tribe dared dwell, but into which all ventured now and then for war and hunting. The Algonquin were divided into many tribes of ever-shifting size. It would Number Six — Winter 2017 be impossible to place them all, or indeed to enumerate them, with any degree of accuracy, for the tribes were continually splitting up, absorbing others, being absorbed in turn, or changing their abode, and, in addition, there were numerous small sub-tribes or bands of renegades, which sometimes were and sometimes were The Shawnees, Cornstalk not considered as portions of their larger neighbors. The chief tribes, however, were well known, and occupied tolerably definite locations. The Delawares dwelt farthest and the Kerrs Creek Massacres east, lying northwest of the upper Ohio, their lands adjoining those of the Senecas, Compiled by Henrietta C. Dunlap the largest and most westernmost of the Six Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walking Purchase August 25, 1737
    The Walking Purchase August 25, 1737 Record Group 26: Records of the Department of State, Basic Documents, Indian Deeds, #35, "Deed of Nutimus, Teeshakommen, et. al.…to John Thomas and Richard Penn" August 25, 1737. Iron gall ink on parchment, 28 3/8"X 17 5/8". Consistent with the Society of Friends' (Quakers) belief that all people are children of God and should be considered equals, William Penn attempted to treat Native Americans (Indians) fairly. Although King Charles II had granted to Penn in 1681 the land that he called "Pennsylvania," a vast expanse including an enormous unexplored wilderness, Penn himself took the further step of purchasing each portion within the grant from the Native American residents before selling subdivisions within it to his colonists. He made his first purchase in 1682 and continued this practice in the following years. Many were for small tracts, some overlapping the previously purchased tracts. William Penn's sons John, Richard and Thomas had inherited the colony's proprietorship, but had lived beyond their means and, like their father, had fallen into debt. In order to increase their income, they began selling land to European settlers before it had been purchased from the Indians. Provincial Secretary James Logan, the Proprietors' most important administrator, was also selling land that lay beyond the area purchased from the Indians. In fact, he was one of Pennsylvania's largest land speculators. The demand for land after Penn's death in 1718 had greatly increased because of heavy immigration from Europe, and settlers were moving north from southeastern Pennsylvania and west from New Jersey.
    [Show full text]