Clipping – Negociações Internacionais

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clipping – Negociações Internacionais 18.03.2015 CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL NEGINT Brasília, 18 de março de 2015 Índice I. OMC ______________________________ 3 Ambassador: WTO Win For Australian Plain Packaging Could Lead to Alcohol Labeling _______________________________________________________ 3 Biased Import Policy of some countries towards Indian Exporters __________ 6 The WTO Work Programme on Electronic Commerce ____________________ 7 WTO's GPA: US applauds Pakistan for attaining observer status ___________ 8 Algeria May Submit WTO Accession File in December, Says Benyounes _____ 9 US wants WTO to stamp out evasion of antidumping duties______________ 10 II. NEGOCIAÇÕES REGIONAIS E BILATERAIS 12 White House Reaches Out To Obama Backers To Boost TPA, TPP Support ___ 12 Backing Levin, Pelosi Says Discussion Of TPP Details Must Precede TPA Decision ______________________________________________________ 13 More than trade, TTIP leads to confident Atlanticism ___________________ 15 Trans-Pacific Partnership: Trade deal could force Australian Government to spend millions to subsidise medicines, expert warns ___________________ 18 Analizan el impacto global en las ciudades del Mercosur ________________ 21 III. OUTROS _________________________ 23 Korea Accuses U.S. Of Failing To Provide 'Patent Linkage' For Biologics ____ 23 RI yet to take full advantage of international trade agreements __________ 25 The big picture behind Brazil's protests ______________________________ 26 1 18.03.2015 The Guardian view on the Petrobras scandal: a big test for Brazil _________ 28 Brazil: a cautionary tale for India Live Mint (Índia) ____________________ 29 2 18.03.2015 I. OMC Ambassador: WTO Win For Australian Plain Packaging Could Lead to Alcohol Labeling Inside U.S. Trade (EUA) Indonesia’s Ambassador to the World Trade Organization Iman Pambagyo last week signaled that a win for an Australian law requiring plain packaging of cigarettes as an anti-smoking measure could lead his country to introduce a similar measure for alcoholic beverages. If the Australian law survived Indonesia’s current challenge in the WTO, it would set a dangerous precedent for countries being able to implement measures that are more trade-restrictive than necessary to fulfill a legitimate policy objective without providing supporting scientific evidence that they could achieve the intended goal, he said in an interview with Inside U.S. Trade. Pambagyo said there have been some officials talking about plain packaging for wine and alcoholic beverages on the ground that Indonesia has a large Muslim population. He said he would not like to see such an expansion of plain packaging in the future. No law on plain packaging for alcoholic products is currently being developed because of Indonesia's challenge in the DSB, according to Pambagyo. But he said a WTO win for Australia on this issue would leave the door open for the Indonesian government to expand plain packaging to alcoholic products without needing to justify that the law would advance the legitimate objective of protecting against moral hazards. Indonesia would be able to base its law “on a moral high ground” because Indonesia is a largely Muslim country and many Muslims do not consume alcohol based on religious principles, Pambagyo said. Pambagyo’s veiled, carefully worded warning about the possibility of retaliation is more explicit than a four-page briefing paper on the WTO plain packaging fight that Indonesia prepared to journalists. 3 18.03.2015 It says that a win for plain packaging could mean it would spread to other products, such as palm oil or alcoholic beverages “for a religious reason of moral hazards." Plain packaging requires companies to use standard colors and typefaces instead of brand logos on package, usually with large health warnings. The law is the last in a series of systematic steps that Australia has undertaken over the years to curtail smoking among its population, in line with the international treaty on tobacco approved by members of the World Health Organization (WHO). Supporters of the law have long made the case that the expansion of plain packaging to products other than tobacco such as sugary drinks is highly unlikely since cigarettes are the only product that will kill people if it is used as intended. They also note that tobacco is the only product that is subject to a WHO treaty called the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which requires signatories to implement a series of policy recommendations that range from tobacco advertisement restrictions and graphic health warnings on packaging to protections from tobacco smoke exposure and the testing and regulating of the contents and emissions of tobacco products. Pambagyo also said Indonesia fears that other countries such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, New Zealand and Chile will follow Australia's example by enacting plain packaging measures on tobacco products. For instance, Irish President Michael Higgins signed into law plain packaging measures on March 10, according to the president's website. In its WTO challenge of Australia’s measure, Indonesia included a violation of Article 2.2 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), which requires WTO signatories to refrain from imposing technical regulations that are more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve a legitimate policy objective in technical regulations, taking into account of the risks non-fulfillment. The TBT article contains an illustrative list of possible legitimate policy objectives, including the protection of human health or safety, but not the prevention of moral hazards. The risks of non-fulfillment can be assessed by relevant “scientific and technical information” among others, according to Article 2.2. Indonesia and the other complainants have charged that the Australian law was adopted without prior presentation of scientific analysis showing that its measures could meet the intended objective. Australia has claimed its law is backed by several studies showing 4 18.03.2015 that such a requirement will help reduce smoking if it is part of a comprehensive set of tobacco control measures. The law was recommended by Australia's National Preventative Health Task Force, which said its findings were backed by 12 peer-reviewed research papers and nine additional studies that are publicly available. Additionally, Indonesia’s briefing paper claims that an analysis conducted since the implementation of Australia's law in 2013 has shown that law has had no effect on Australian smoking rates. According to the briefing paper, Indonesia does not oppose any effort to address the harmful effects of tobacco products and itself taken measures to discourage smoking. This includes a regulation that requires graphic health warnings on 40 percent of a cigarette pack compared to the 30 percent minimum required by the WHO framework. The briefing paper notes that some signatories of the framework have not implemented that minimum requirement. The brief also claims that some of Indonesia's smoking regulations are stricter or as strict than those of major economies including the European Union. Indonesia considers that its graphic warning requirement is less trade restrictive than necessary because it does not deny the use of a trademark, as does the Australian law, Pambagyo said. The objective of protecting public morals is a possible exception to otherwise prevailing trade obligations under Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Article XX allows members to impose measures necessary to protect public morals under the condition that they are not a disguised trade restriction and do not constitute an unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail. In the WTO case, Indonesia also charges a violation of Article 2.1 of the TBT, which states that members shall give imports treatment that is “no less favourable” than that of like products of national origin. It also charges that it is a violation of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), including the rights of trademark owners and rules on geographic indications (GIs). In the WTO fight, Indonesia has claimed that the Australian measures do not allow cigarettes to display trademarks, GIs, or “any other marking other than an alphanumeric code for product identification purposes.” 5 18.03.2015 It has charged that this constitutes violations of Articles 22.2(b) and 24.3 of TRIPS, which apply to GIs. Article 22.2(b) protects against “unfair competition” as defined by the 1967 Paris Convention, which defines unfair competition as acts that “create confusion by any means whatever with the establishment, the goods, or the industrial or commercial activities, of a competitor.” Indonesia has also charged that the Australian law violates TRIPS Article 20, which state that the use of a trademark shall not be unjustifiably encumbered by special requirements. Indonesia requested a panel on March 3, 2014 and one was subsequently established on March 26, 2014. Indonesia is joined by Honduras, Cuba, Ukraine and the Dominican Republic as co-complainants. In October 2014, the DSB panel announced it would not issue a ruling before the first half of 2016. Biased Import Policy of some countries towards Indian Exporters Business Standard (Índia) Government monitors the measures/actions being taken by countries including the WTO member countries which Government considers as inconsistent with the existing agreement or otherwise, and take up the matter in the appropriate forum in case the measure impacts India's exports. India has taken up such issues either at the bilateral level or multilateral level (under WTO Committee meetings or the WTO Dispute Settlement System). In the recent past, India had taken up such matters with the importing countries and had been successful in such matters to a large extent. A few of them are:- (i) Successful negotiation leading to replacement of the inconsistent EU Regulation 1383/2003 by EU Regulation 608/2013 on the issue related to seizure of Indian drugs in transit. (ii) Result oriented outcome in trade remedial actions such as the withdrawal of safeguard duty by Turkey on cotton yarn, safeguard duty by Egypt on cotton fabric and cotton yarn etc.
Recommended publications
  • Executive Branch
    EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide to the President.— Anita Decker Breckenridge. Director of Oval Office Operations.—Brian Mosteller. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 276, 456–9000. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Dr. Jill Biden.—Sheila Nix, EEOB, room 200, 456–7458.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc5m United States Science in English Created at 2016-12-20 06:12
    Announcement DC5m United States science in english 100 articles, created at 2016-12-20 06:12 articles set mostly positive rate 2.7 1 0.0 Nevada's 6 electors cast formal ballots for Clinton Nevada’s six Democratic presidential electors cast their official Electoral College votes for Hillary Clinton on Monday, including three who originally backed her rival Bernie (6.99/7) Sanders in Nevada’s caucuses in February. 2016-12-19 21:38 3KB www.washingtontimes.com 2 2.9 EPA Halts Climate Rules As Trump Presidency Looms (2.11/7) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) halted work Monday on plans to create a patchwork program allowing states to comply with climate rules regulating the country's coal power plants. Jane McC 2016-12-19 19:16 3KB dailycaller.com 3 7.4 Pregnancy can change parts of brain, new study shows (2.10/7) Researchers find hints that the brain alterations may actually help women prepare for motherhood. 2016-12-19 21:14 3KB www.pressherald.com 4 5.6 Wildlife officials draft jaguar recovery plan As part of the proposal, scientists are not prescribing jaguar reintroductions in the U. S. (2.06/7) 2016-12-19 21:14 4KB rssfeeds.detroitnews.com 5 4.8 Hospital doctor’s gender may influence patient’s chance of survival (2.06/7) A new study suggests patients treated by women doctors were more likely to leave the hospital alive. 2016-12-19 21:00 3KB www.pressherald.com 6 4.0 Climate change deniers map of America According to the researchers from George Washington University, many Americans (2.05/7) believe global warming is related to the frequency of weather-related events they experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2013 Digest of Other White House
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2013 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2013 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 1 In the evening, the President traveled to Honolulu, HI, arriving the following morning. The White House announced that the President will travel to Honolulu, HI, in the evening. January 2 In the morning, upon arrival at Joint Base Pearl Harbor–Hickam, HI, the President traveled to Kailua, HI, where he had separate telephone conversations with Gov. Christopher J. Christie of New Jersey and Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York to discuss Congressional action on the Hurricane Sandy supplemental request. In the afternoon, the President signed H.R. 8, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. During the day, the President had an intelligence briefing. He also signed H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. January 3 In the morning, the President had a telephone conversation with House Republican Leader Eric Cantor and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to extend his welcome to all Members of the 113th Congress. In the afternoon, the President had a telephone conversation with Speaker of the House of Representatives John A. Boehner and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to congratulate them on being redesignated to lead their respective parties in the House. During the day, the President had an intelligence briefing. The President announced the designation of the following individuals as members of a Presidential delegation to attend the Inauguration of John Dramani Mahama as President of Ghana on January 7: Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunity of the Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach from Congressional Subpoena
    Immunity of the Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach From Congressional Subpoena The Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach (“OPSO”) is immune from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s subpoena to compel him to testify about matters concerning his service to the President in the OPSO. July 15, 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT You have asked whether Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach (“OPSO”) David Simas is legally required to appear to testify at a congressional hearing scheduled for July 16, 2014, in response to a subpoena issued to Mr. Simas by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 10, 2014. We understand that the Committee seeks testimony about “whether the White House is taking adequate steps to ensure that political activity by Administration officials complies with relevant statutes, including the Hatch Act,” and about “the role and function of the White House Office of Political Strategy and Outreach.” Letter for David Simas from the Hon. Darrell Issa, Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives (July 3, 2014) (“Invitation Letter”). For the reasons set forth below, we believe that Mr. Simas is immune from compulsion to testify before the Committee on these matters, and therefore is not required to appear to testify in response to this subpoena. I. A. The Executive Branch’s longstanding position, reaffirmed by numerous Ad- ministrations of both political parties, is that the President’s immediate advisers are absolutely immune from congressional testimonial process.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeanne Lambrew Marilyn Tavenner Jon Blum
    3:00-4:00pm WHITE HOUSE DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM MEETING Roosevelt Room Participants: Jeanne Lambrew Marilyn Tavenner Jon Blum Mark Childress Tim Gronniger, DPC Chris Dawe, NEC James D'Orta, Consumer Health Services Steve ErkenBrack, President and CEO, Rocky Mountain Health Plans, Grand Junction, CO Ben Chu, MD, Group President, Kaiser-Permanente of Southern California and HI Nancy Schlichting, CEO, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI John Koster, MD, President and CEO, Providence Health System, Renton, WA Francis "Jay" Crosson, AMA, Chicago Format: - Guests and senior White House and HHS personnel will be seated around the table. - Childress welcomes guests to the White House and introduces YOU. - YOU give overview of meeting purpose. - Marilyn gives overview of Administration delivery system reform activities. - YOU and Childress moderate group discussion. - After one hour, YOU, Childress, (Marilyn) depart; Lambrew (Tavenner) Dawe and Gronniger stay to continue the discussion, if needed. 4:00-4:15pm DEPART WHITE HOUSE EN ROUTE TO HHS 4:30-6:00pm HEALTH REFORM IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE Deputy Secretary’s Conference Room 7:30pm (b)(6) Wednesday, May 1 Runner: AM Security: (b)(6), (b)(7)(F) PM Security: 9:15-9:30am DEPART RESIDENCE EN ROUTE US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 7 9:30-9:50am OFFICIAL REMARKS: WE THE PEOPLE HEALTHCARE SYMPOSIUM US Chamber of Commerce Hall of Flags 1615 H Street NW Staff: Advance: Hollis Chappell and Samira Jali Press: Open Participants: Cástulo de la Rocha, President and CEO, AltaMed Audience: 300 primarily Latino CEO’s, Business Owners and Executives Format: - YOU will be introduced by Mr. de la Rocha - YOU will give remarks and depart 10:00-11:00am DEPART EN ROUTE TO JHU BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 615 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Milken Institute Global Conference from Theappstore Orgoogleplay
    MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to increase global prosperity by advancing collaborative solutions that widen access to capital, create jobs and improve health. We do this through independent, data-driven research, action-oriented meetings, and meaningful policy initiatives. 1250 Fourth Street 1101 New York Avenue NW, Suite 620 137 Market Street #10-02 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Washington, DC 20005 Singapore 048943 Phone: 310-570-4600 Phone: 202-336-8900 Phone: 65-9457-0212 #MIGLOBAL AGENDA | LOS ANGELES | APRIL 28 - MAY 1 E-mail: [email protected] • www.milkeninstitute.org download the Global Conference mobileapp download theGlobalConference descriptions and up-to-date programming information, information, descriptions andup-to-dateprogramming AT YOUR FINGER TIPS YOUR AT To find complete speaker biographies, panel findcompletespeakerbiographies, panel To SEE: requests andconnectwithparticipants requests CONNECT: speaker biographies,andvenuemaps Milken Institute Global Conference Global Institute Milken from the App Store orGooglePlay. theAppStore from CUSTOMIZE: the full agenda, panel descriptions, the fullagenda,paneldescriptions, and personalschedule opt-in to make meeting opt-in tomakemeeting your profile your profile MIGlobal WILSHIRE BOULEVARD WILSHIRE ENTRANCE 11 12 13 14 15 16 SALES & CATERING WELLNESS GARDEN CORPORATE EVENTS 21 CA WILSHIRE GARDEN TERRACE LOBBY EXECUTIVE GIFT SHOP BAR 17 18 19 20 OFFICES 4 Networking Areas 8 PAVILION LOUNGE VALET 22 7 5 Pavilion Lounge 9 6 Lobby Bar 10 Wilshire Garden Circa 55 (Lower Level)
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A—Digest of Other White House Announcements
    Appendix A—Digest of Other White House Announcements The following list includes the President’s pub- of John Dramani Mahama as President of Gha- lic schedule and other items of general interest na in Accra, Ghana, on January 7: announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this book. Daniel W. Yohannes (head of delegation); Gene A. Cretz; January 1 Johnnie Carson; and The White House announced that the Presi- Donald G. Teitelbaum. dent will travel to Honolulu, HI, in the eve- ning. The President announced the renomination In the evening, the President traveled to of Robert E. Bacharach to be a judge on the Honolulu, HI, arriving the following morning. U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. The President announced the renomination January 2 of Caitlin J. Halligan and Srikanth Srinivasan to In the morning, upon arrival at Joint Base be judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI, the President trav- District of Columbia Circuit. eled to Kailua, HI, where he had separate tele- The President announced the renomination phone conversations with Gov. Christopher J. of William J. Kayatta, Jr., to be a judge on the Christie of New Jersey and Gov. Andrew M. U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Cuomo of New York to discuss Congressional The President announced the renomination action on the Hurricane Sandy supplemental of Jill A. Pryor to be a judge on the U.S. Court request. of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. In the afternoon, the President signed H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Decision Making: Crafting Policy, Advancing Nominations, and Managing Crises
    White House Decision Making: Crafting Policy, Advancing Nominations, and Managing Crises. Yohannes Abraham, Wednesdays 4:15-5:45 Every White House faces innumerable challenges: daily national security threats, legislative must-dos, policy implementation priorities, personnel and management issues, natural disasters, and public relations crises. How do White House staff, cabinet agencies, interest groups, and the Hill work together (or in opposition) to shape official policy positions? How does the White House win (or lose) nomination and legislative battles with Congress? How does the West Wing formulate its response to man-made and natural crises? This study group will take a look at how prior White Houses have set themselves up to face the challenges they chose, as well as the challenges that chose them. Session 1: 9/20 - White House 101 In our first session, we will take a look at the organizational structure of the previous White House with an eye towards understanding the basics of what decision making looked like inside those four walls. We will also discuss the functions of the internal coordination, external communication, and policy coordinating bodies in the White House—from the National Security Council to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and everything in between –in order to better understand how they work together as a team (and how they sometimes don’t). Session 2: 9/27 - Resistance: Opposing a White House From the Outside Outside effort can support or derail a White House’s priorities. In this study group, we will look at how outside groups and the Hill set themselves up in response to a White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S1450
    S1450 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE March 14, 2016 EXECUTIVE SESSION Even more astonishing, she stated been returned to their home countries. unequivocally, ‘‘I will not deport chil- Yes, some may have received a depor- dren. I would not deport children.’’ As tation order from a court—usually EXECUTIVE CALENDAR I stated, this is pure opportunism. For after failing to appear for a hearing. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under instance, I imagine this child shown in Yet the Obama administration has the previous order, the Senate will pro- this poster would have liked Secretary made little to no effort to locate them. ceed to executive session to consider Clinton’s policy to have been in effect Therefore, it is fair to say the human the following nomination, which the during her husband’s administration. traffickers, the so-called coyotes, clerk will report. This is the famous picture of Elian weren’t wrong, and many Central The bill clerk read the nomination of Gonzalez, a 6-year-old Cuban boy who John B. King, of New York, to be Sec- American parents took an understand- reached our shores despite his mother able risk. After all, a life in America in retary of Education. tragically dying at sea. Elian’s U.S.- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the shadows—as advocates for amnesty based family pleaded with the Clinton the previous order, there will be 90 and open borders call it—may be pref- administration to grant him asylum, minutes of debate equally divided in erable to poverty and violence back as was our common custom for refu- the usual form.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks Section
    December 7, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1609 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS BEVERLY WINTERS ies, serving as the Executive Director of the As a nation that was built by those who es- Baptist General Convention of Texas, and caped religious persecution in their home- HON. ED PERLMUTTER over 40 years of pastoring all over the nation lands, we must not forget that thousands of including as my own pastor at First Baptist others across the globe are facing the same OF COLORADO Church in Midland, Texas. persecution as our forefathers. The 21st Cen- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Under Dr. Everett’s leadership, the 21st tury Wilberforce Initiative has given these peo- Wednesday, December 7, 2016 Century Wilberforce Initiative has experienced ple a voice and hope that one day they can Mr. PERLMUTTER. Mr. Speaker, I rise remarkable growth and has left a lasting im- share the same liberties that we all cherish today to applaud Beverly Winters for being pact through their work. The organization has here in this great nation. I applaud the 21st recognized by the West Chamber as a 2016 now grown to two offices: one in the Wash- Century Wilberforce Initiative for their hard Celebrate Women Honoree. Celebrate Women ington, D.C. area that focuses on the United work and pray that God blesses them and Honorees are known for their perseverance, States’ engagement in protecting religious lib- continues to provide them with the strength accomplishments, generosity, and dedication erties and a second office in Dallas, Texas, and courage to continue their mission to help to their passions and their community.
    [Show full text]
  • Passing the Baton
    US Transition—5 perry anderson PASSING THE BATON he us election of 2016, confounding general expectations, has attracted a wide range of readings. Yet while significant further data are sure to come, sufficient figures are available for a preliminary assessment. What are the relevant bottom- Tlines? The first is voter participation. Overall turnout jumped 5.4 per cent in 2004 when Bush was re-elected, the major increase this century. A small further flicker upwards—1.4 per cent—followed when Obama won in 2008, cancelled with a 2.2 per cent drop when he was re-elected in 2012. This year turnout fell once again, by about 0.3 per cent. Increasing partisan polarization, in other words, has not been accompanied by any real electoral mobilization. In the Electoral College, the scale of Trump’s victory was larger than that of Kennedy in 1960, Nixon in 1968, Carter in 1976, and Bush Jr in both 2000 and 2004. In that sense it was not a close result. But as widely noted, it was the achievement of a tiny net margin of 77,744 votes in three states, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, that produced it. Against this slither, Clinton lost the election with a lead in the popu- lar vote—2.87 million—larger than that of Kennedy, Nixon I, Carter or Bush Jr I when each won the Presidency. Discrepancies between voter choice and electoral upshot are no rarity in capitalist democracies— regularly on display in Britain or Japan, more drastically of late in Italy; the current American case, reversing a 2.1 per cent margin between the two candidates, as a product of a federal system, is in no way an outlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Advisers' Testimony Before
    Presidential Advisers’ Testimony Before Congressional Committees: An Overview name redacted Legislative Attorney name redacted Specialist in American National Government name redacted Legislative Attorney December 15, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL31351 Presidential Advisers’ Testimony Before Congressional Committees: An Overview Summary Since the beginning of the federal government, Presidents have called upon executive branch officials to provide them with advice regarding matters of policy and administration. While Cabinet members were among the first to play such a role, the creation of the Executive Office of the President (EOP) in 1939 and the various agencies located within that structure resulted in a large increase in the number and variety of presidential advisers. All senior staff members of the White House Office and the leaders of the various EOP agencies and instrumentalities could be said to serve as advisers to the President. Occasionally, these executive branch officials playing a presidential advisory role have been called upon to testify before congressional committees and subcommittees. Sometimes, such invited appearances have been prompted by allegations of personal misconduct on the part of the official, but they have also included instances when accountability for policymaking and administrative or managerial actions have instigated the request for testimony. Because such appearances before congressional committees or subcommittees seemingly could result in demands for advice proffered to the President, or the disclosure—inadvertent or otherwise—of such advice, there has been resistance, from time to time, by the Chief Executive to allowing such testimony. Congress has a constitutionally rooted right of access to the information it needs to perform its Article I legislative and oversight functions.
    [Show full text]