MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE ELOISE Multi Sectoral Needs Assessment - Sofala Province
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYCLONE ELOISE Multi Sectoral Needs Assessment - Sofala Province Data collection period: 4 — 6 March 2021 OVERVIEW On the 23 January 2021, Tropical Cyclone ELOISE made landfall in central Mozambique, near Beira city. The cyclone brought heavy winds and rains, affecting the provinces of Manica, Sofala, and Zambezia (the same provinces affected by Tropical Cyclone Idai in 2019). It also caused widespread flooding and destruction of infrastructure. From 4 — 6 March 2021, in close coordination with Mozambique’s National Institute for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction (INGD) and IOM DTM (Displacement Tracking Matrix), enumerator teams conducted a Multi-Sectoral Needs Assessment (MSNA) at the locality level. Training, data analysis and data processing were produced through DTM, supported by INGD. The assessment covered the most affected districts in Sofala province. DTM teams interviewed Key Informants (mainly from local authorities), capturing information on shelter repairs, access to services, and urgent needs. DTM Assessment Results Chemba Tete Sena 57,102 Murraça Zambezia Caia 37,661 Maringue Caia 141,734 85,769 Affected Individuals Chupanga 76,226 Marromeu Sofala Cheringoma Marromeu Gorongosa 152,351 28,637 Manica Muanza Affected Households 8,655 Muanza Galinha DTM Assessment Coverage 42,628 Nhamatanda Dondo Province 1 Cidade Da Beira Goonda Buzi Districts 41,274 XXX Aected individuals 4 Chibabava by posto 19,063 2018 pop. census Chibabava 8,655 - 19,063 Administrative Muxungue 19,064 - 42,628 42,629 - 57,102 10 Posts 104,368 57,103 - 85,769 85,770 - 104,368 Machanga 104,369 and above Localities Posto boundary 26 District boundary Inhambane Province boundary This map is for illustration purposes only names and boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. DTM IN MOZAMBIQUE IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a system to to track, assess and monitor displacement, population mobility and needs. It is designed to regularly and systematically capture, process and disseminate information to provide a better understanding of the movements and evolving needs of displaced and affected populations. DTM has been implemented in Mozambique since 2013 with contextualized forms and tools for disaster and crisis needs assessments in coordination with the National Institute for Disaster Management (INGD). METHODOLOGY Data collection by enumerators took place through Key Informant interviews, with KIs being the local authorities at each locality. Information was gathered at all 10 postos in the 4 assessed districts. A team of three enumerators contacted each KI, to conduct an interview with the aim to assess the needs and vulnerabilities of the population affected by the cyclone in southern Manica province. DEFINITION Affected population inside a locality: Resident population whose homes were affected by partial or total shelter damage and have not left the assessed locality. DTM enumerators conduct interviews after Tropical Cyclone Eloise — Jan 2021 In close coordination with: For more information or to report an alert, please contact: DTM information products: [email protected] http://displacement.iom.int/mozambique MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYLONE ELOISE — SOFALA MSNA Demographics and vulnerable groups Data unavailable from Key Informants for this MSLA data collection. Urgent needs and assistance Chemba Tete Sena Sede Sena Zambezia LicomaLicoma Murraça Drinking water was the first Murraça 1st most Caia Caia Sede Maringue Mponda most urgent need in 12 localities. Caia urgent need Chupanga NdoroNdoro Nensa Chupanga Marromeu 2nd most Shelter was the second most MeguguneChueza urgent need in 10 localities. Malingapansi urgent need Cheringoma Marromeu Gorongosa Chenapamimba 3rd most Agricultural inputs were the Manica Muanza Sede third most urgent need in 9 Galinha urgent need Sofala Muanza Muanza localities. Mussapassua Galinha Sede Nhansato Nhamatanda Dondo In 62 per cent of localities (16 out of 26), hosting an affected Mutindiri population of 83,260 individuals, reported that vulnerable Cidade Da Beira Goonda Sede groups have not received any kind of food assistance. It is also Chinhica estimate that in total 56,517 individuals need food assistance. Goonda Toronga Buzi Aected families by locality Hamamba 1,000 The most common coping strategy reported has been mutual Chibabava Sede Panja 500 Chibabava Muxúngue Sede 250 assistance, in 54 per cent of localities. Forty-six per cent 50100 Hode 10 Mucheve Did vulnerable group of localities reported having received help from the local Muxungue received any kind of Chibabava government. Only 12 per cent of localities reported receiving food assistance No help from NGOs. Machanga Yes Posto boundary Assessed district Inhambane District boundary SHELTER ASSISTANCE 85% Muanza 100% 15% No Yes Fig 1: Shelter assistance received It is reported that 20,388 households were in need of shelter assistance. In 85 per cent of localities (22 out of 26), no one had received shelter assistance. Of the areas were shelter assistance was received, 100 per cent were in Muanza. No shelter assistance has been delivered in other districts for those newly affected by Tropical Cyclone Eloise (an estimated 14,041 individuals need shelter assistance in Caia, Chibabava, and Marromeu districts). 3 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYLONE ELOISE — SOFALA MSNA SHELTER ASSISTANCE CONT. In those localities were shelter assistance was provided, only 15 per cent of households received it. Shelter kits were predominantly used to cover/fix the roof of their shelters (in 100% of localities), to cover damaged walls (in 75% of localities), and to repair other built structure (25% of localities). 85% To cover all the roof 100% To cover damaged walls 75% 15% To repair other built structures 25% No Yes Fig 2: Shelter kits distribution and uses Chemba Tete Sena Sede Sena Zambezia Licoma Murraça It was also reported that affected individuals had Murraça Caia Caia Sede repaired their homes/shelters since the cyclone in Maringue Mponda Caia 92 per cent of localities (with Licoma and Nidoro, in Chupanga Caia, being the two localities where no repairs have Ndoro Chupanga Nensa taken place). In total, an estimated 1,532 households MeguguneChueza (7,660 individuals) undertook self-repairs of their Marromeu homes. Despite the self-repairs, the shelter needs Malingapansi Cheringoma Marromeu of the affected population should not be considered Gorongosa fulfilled. The main sources of building materials Chenapamimba were local materials (65% of localities), and Manica Muanza Sede Muanza recovered materials which were used to repair Sofala Muanza Galinha roofs (in 38% of localities). Mussapassua Galinha Sede Nhamatanda Nhansato Dondo 8,190 traditional houses Mutindiri partially destroyed Cidade Da Beira Goonda Sede Chinhica 10,050 traditional Buzi Goonda Toronga houses totally destroyed Did the Aected Hamamba Chibabava Sede Panja popualation received ChibabavaMuxúngue Sede the shelter kit No Hode Mucheve Yes Chibabava Muxungue Aected families by locality 1,000 500 250 50100 Machanga 10 District boundary Assessed district Inhambane Posto boundary 4 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYLONE ELOISE — SOFALA MSNA LIVELIHOOD Overall 96% 4% Muanza 100% Marromeu 100% Chibabava 90% 10% Caia 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Agriculture (growing crops) Trading Fig 3: Livelihoods of the population before the cyclone Agriculture was the predominant source of livelihood in all four assessed districts before the cyclone. Every locality reported that the main livelihood of the population had been impacted by the cyclone. In 85 per cent of localities, the main impact on livelihoods and economic activities came from productive lands being flooded and/or damaged. When asked to specify the meaning of “other” impact on livelihood, 5 localities (71% of those citing “other”) reported that their local cultures of crops had been destroyed. No, 2% Produc�ve land or area ProducProduc��veve land land or or area area 89% 3% is flooded or damaged 89%85% 3% isis flfloodedooded oror damageddamaged Other 17% No NoYes Other 17% 27% Yes YesNo Unable to purchase equipment 11% Yes, 98% /materials necessary Unable to purchase equipment Equipment/infrastructure 11% 27% /materials/materials necessarynecessary 0% 97% was destroyed or damaged 97%100% Fig 4: Impact of the cyclone on livelihoods of the population and type of impact Agriculture and Farmland 4% In 100 per cent of localities, it was reported that the affected population has continued access to farming 35% lands. In 35 per cent of localities, it takes under an hour to reach the farmland, and in the majority of localities 1 hour (62% of localities) the farmland is 1-2 hours walking 1-2 Hour away. 2-3 Hour In total it is estimated that 27,280 hectares of maize has been affected by the cyclone, 11,998 hectares of sorghum, 62% and 10,605 hectares of beans. It is estimated that 9,778 hectares of maize have been lost, 5,865 hectares of beans, and 3,246 of sorghum. Fig 5: Average time taken for population to walk to farmland 5 MOZAMBIQUE: TROPICAL CYLONE ELOISE — SOFALA MSNA ACCESS TO MARKET AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the cyclone, 23 of the 26 localities had access to a market (Licoma in Caia, and Muanza and Mussapassua in Muanza being the exceptions). Following the cyclone, an additional locality had no access to a market, Chenapaminba in Muanza, while the KI for Licoma did not know if access to a market was still an issue in the locality. Damaged market infrastructure was one of the main reasons for reduced access, while others report that the market was simply not functioning as before. It was also reported that both fixed banks and banking stalls had been affected by the cyclone. A total of 42 fixed banks were damaged, and 38 totally destroyed. Similarly, 157 banking stalls were damaged, and 103 were destroyed. HEALTH Prior to the cyclone, 25 of the 26 assessed localities (Mussapassua being the exception) had a functioning health facility. This reduced to 22 following the cyclone, with 4 localities reporting no access. Five localities reported that the health facilities had not functioned previously (Nhansato, Mussapassua, Chnapamimba, and Galinha, all in Muanza).