DOCSLIB.ORG

Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project: Nepal's Portion of Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project: Nepal's Portion of Water Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project: Nepal’s Portion of Water S.B. Pun Abstract: On September 20, 1996 an overwhelming 96.5% of the members present at the Joint Session of the Nepalese Parliament hurriedly ratified the Mahakali Treaty to fulfill the requirements of Article 126 of the 1990 Constitution of Nepal.The then Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba and Water Resources Minister Pashupati SJB Rana provided CPN-UML General Secretary Madhav Kumar Nepal and CPN-UML Mahakali Study Team Coordinator KP Sharma (Oli) written replies on the “equal sharing” of the Mahakali waters. However, despite the lapse of 15 years, the two critical clauses: i) “...equal entitlement in the use of Mahakali waters without prejudice to their respective consumptive uses...,” and ii) “...precludes the claim, in any form, by either Party on the unutilized portion of the shares of the waters...” still remain obfuscated and clouded in mist. Is “equal entitlement” (50 percent each) considered after deducting the respective consumptive uses as interpreted but later withdrawn by Minister Rana? Or is this “equal entitlement” (50 percent each) considered prior to deducting the consumptive uses as interpreted by Secretary General MK Nepal and then applying the clause “without prejudice” to their re- spective consumptive uses? No attempts appear to have been made by Nepal to elicit the Government of India’s interpretations on this vital issue. The Ganges basin supports a massive over 523 million people; i.e., 450 million in India, 45 million in Bangladesh, and 28 million in Nepal. With India’s economy growing consistently at a high 8 to 9% annually, the quality of life of her people is definitely on the rise. This will invariably mean drastic increases in her per capita consumption of water. With Nepal contributing over 72% of the dry season flows of the Ganges, India’s eyes and ears are on Nepal either in the form of “...without prejudice to their respective consumptive uses...” or “...precludes the claim, in any form, ...the unutilized portion of the waters...” However, Nepalese governments from the Panchayat era perceived water, whether by design or otherwise, as a mere secondary component of hydropower. Despite the full knowledge that water has become a scarce diminishing resource, the Nepalese Governments continue to be mesmerized by hydropower. This is manifested by the government unveiling in a span of two years her grand dreams of 10,000 MW in ten years and 25,000 MW in twenty years. This article attempts to delve into the intrica- cies of the Mahakali waters as expounded by Prime Minister SB Deuba’s government during the extremely hurried ratification the Mahakali Treaty in 1996. Key words: Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, Mahakali Treaty of 1996, India, Nepal Foreword year later, Nepali Congress party politicians, under the Much has been said and written on what Nepal can CPN-UML led government, resorted to an emergency earn from export of power to India from the 6,480 MW Caesarian-like operation of the Ministry of Water Re- Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project. In the aftermath sources to deliver two wonder babies – the Ministry of of Mahakali Treaty ratification in September 1996, Energy and the Ministry of Irrigation. The Nepali Con- Water Resources Minister Pashupati S.J.B. Rana, at gress politicians further unveiled a master plan even far a press briefing, claimed an annual revenue stream of more grandiose than its predecessor, the 25,000 MW of Rs 21 billion through electricity export to India. K.P. hydropower in 20 years!3 While billions of Rupees with Sharma (Oli) (incidentally, Coordinator of CPN-UML’s tens of thousands of megawatts were being rolled out in Mahakali Treaty Study Team) claimed a far more as- the “second richest water resources endowed country in tronomical figure of Rs 120 billion annually. Fourteen the world,”4 sadly not a word was uttered about water years later, in 2010, Prime Minister M.K. Nepal rolled itself – that valuable diminishing and scarce resource in out yet another figure of Rs 45.88 billion annually.1 the Indo-Gangetic basin. While our political masters competed over the billions of Rupees, another form of competition in megawatts Whether by design or otherwise, electricity has al- has recently raised its head in the political arena. ways been projected as the glamorous component of Pancheshwar, which would raise Nepal’s living stan- In 2007 (2065 VS), the then government, led by the dard to the level of Bhutan’s ‘Gross National Happiness’ United-CPN Maoists with its CPN-UML administered (GNP). Little, or in fact nothing, has been said or writ- Ministry of Water Resources, unveiled the grand 10,000 ten on the unglamorous water component of Panchesh- MW of hydropower in 10 years Master Plan.2 Barely a war Multipurpose Project.5 48 HYDRO NEPAL ISSUE NO. 8 JANUARY, 2011 This article attempts to delve into the complexities and stead that Nepal and India are entitled half-half waters obfuscation of Nepal’s portion of water in that much of the common Mahakali river. M.K. Nepal demanded trumpeted ‘sun to rise from the west’ Mahakali Treaty. that the government of Nepal get this same interpreta- tion from the Government of India.7 Mahakali Treaty Ratification Night: September 20, 1996 Water Resources Minister Rana replied that the govern- ment wanted to transform the Tanakpur problem into In the late evening of September 20, 1996 (Ashwin 4, opportunity by tying it with Pancheshwar to achieve a 2053 VS on the Nepalese calendar), Ram Chandra Pou- “new break-through” in water resources development del, Chairman of the Joint Session of the two Houses of by opening a “new door” for the export of electricity. Parliament, the meeting giving the floor first to Mad- On the Kosi and Gandaki river treaties raised by Gen- hav Kumar Nepal, leader of main Opposition Party eral Secretary M.K. Nepal, Minister Rana agreed that and General Secretary of Communist Party of Nepal, Nepalese nationalism did cry over those treaties then; the United Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML).5 M.K. Nepal but that very nationalism now is all smiles – precious harked back to the Nepal-India treaties of Kosi (AD smiles – on the Mahakali Treaty. 1954) and Gandaki (AD 1959) concluded by M.P. Koira- la and B.P. Koirala, respectively, that the Nepalese now Regarding “existing consumptive uses” of the Mahaka- reflect upon with pain and sorrows. He stated that the li Treaty, Article 3, Minister Rana referred to Prime Nepalese cannot forget the series of Indian objections Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba’s letter of September that blocked international funds for implementing the 26, 1996 (Bhadra 26, 2053 VS) to CPN-UML General Kankai, Babai and Sikta irrigation projects. M.K. Nepal Secretary M.K. Nepal, wherein the Prime Minister had further stated that with the then Prime Minister, G.P. already explained that both the countries have “equal Koirala, condoning India’s unilateral construction of entitlement” to the Mahakali waters. After completion Tanakpur Barrage on the Mahakali River through the of the Pancheshwar Project, Minister Rana stated that Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the previous both countries “have equal entitlement to the Mahakali Nepalese wounds have been reopened. M.K. Nepal also waters without prejudice to their existing consumptive pointed out that it was during the repressive Panchayat uses” (emphasis added). Minister Rana added that this era government regime that Indian security forces oc- equal entitlement to all the Mahakali waters was the cupied Darchula’s Tinkar and the secret 1965 Nepal- government’s stand, implying that anything presented India Security Treaty was signed. earlier contrary to this would be inadmissible. Minis- ter Rana then proposed to the House an understanding M.K. Nepal then revealed that his party, the CPN-UML, that was prepared with the consensus of the CPN-UML, had received the following political commitments from wherein the Detailed Project Report (DPR) preparation His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (HMGN) and In- of Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project will be based on dia, that:6 the Prime Minister’s letter of September 11, 1996 (Bhad- 1) The Mahakali is basically a border river, ra 26, 2053 VS), to the CPN-UML General Secretary; 2) both countries have equal rights to the Mahakali that is, that the four understandings will be undertaken waters, as ‘Rashtriya Sankalpas’ (National Strictures)8 and that 3) Nepal will sell India a portion of her electricity gen- an All Party Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Commit- erated from Pancheshwar and the price of energy tee will be constituted to provide an overall guidance to will be determined on the avoided cost principle, the government. 4) decision on DPR (Detailed Project Report) will be made through national consensus of an All Party Chairman R.C. Poudel then called for voting at around Committee, 10:30pm of September 20, 1996 (Ashwin 4, 2053 VS). 5) members to the Mahakali River Commission will be Two hundred and twenty Members of Parliament (MPs) nominated through national consensus, and voted for the motion to ratify the Mahakali Treaty, 6) the entire western Nepal-India border will be de- only eight MPs voted against the motion, and 31 MPs marcated scientifically within a stipulated period abstained.9,10 As the members present at the joint ses- of time and the Indian military post removed from sion of two Houses were 228 and as an overwhelming Darchula District. 220 members (96.5% of the members present) voted M.K. Nepal called the Water Resources Minister Pash- for the ratification of the Treaty, this easily fulfilled the upati S.J.B. Rana’s interpretation of Mahakali Treaty’s 66% requirement stipulated by Article 126 of the 1990 Article 3 totally faulty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Civil Society in Uncivil Places: Soft State and Regime Change in Nepal
    48 About this Issue Recent Series Publications: Policy Studies 48 Policy Studies Policy This monograph analyzes the role of civil Policy Studies 47 society in the massive political mobilization Supporting Peace in Aceh: Development and upheavals of 2006 in Nepal that swept Agencies and International Involvement away King Gyanendra’s direct rule and dra- Patrick Barron, World Bank Indonesia matically altered the structure and character Adam Burke, London University of the Nepali state and politics. Although the opposition had become successful due to a Policy Studies 46 strategic alliance between the seven parlia- Peace Accords in Northeast India: mentary parties and the Maoist rebels, civil Journey over Milestones Places in Uncivil Society Civil society was catapulted into prominence dur- Swarna Rajagopalan, Political Analyst, ing the historic protests as a result of nation- Chennai, India al and international activities in opposition to the king’s government. This process offers Policy Studies 45 new insights into the role of civil society in The Karen Revolution in Burma: Civil Society in the developing world. Diverse Voices, Uncertain Ends By focusing on the momentous events of Ardeth Maung Thawnghmung, University of the nineteen-day general strike from April Massachusetts, Lowell 6–24, 2006, that brought down the 400- Uncivil Places: year-old Nepali royal dynasty, the study high- Policy Studies 44 lights the implications of civil society action Economy of the Conflict Region within the larger political arena involving con- in Sri Lanka: From Embargo to Repression ventional actors such as political parties, trade Soft State and Regime Muttukrishna Sarvananthan, Point Pedro unions, armed rebels, and foreign actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Facets of Democracy: an Overview
    Molung Educational Frontier 15 Facets of Democracy: An Overview Aswasthama Bhakta Kharel, PhD* Abstract Democracy allows the expression of political preferences of citizens in a state. It advocates the rule of law, constraints on executive’s power, and guarantees the provision of civil liberties. It also manages to ensure human rights and fundamental freedoms of people. In democracy, people are supposed to exercise their freely expressed will. Ordinary people hold the political power of the state and rule directly or through elected representatives inside a democratic form of government. Democracy is a participatory and liberal way of governing a country. Different countries in the world have been practicing various models of democracy. There remains the participation of people in government and policy-making of the state under democracy. But when the majority can pull the strings of the society without there being legislation for protecting the rights of the minority, it may create a severe risk of oppression. Many countries of the world at the present time are facing democratic deficits. In several countries, the democratic practices are not adequately regulated and governed, as a result, the rise of violations of rules of law is observed. Even a few countries practicing democracy are not living peacefully. This situation has put a significant question about the need and sustainability of democracy. Democracy is a widely used system of governance beyond having several challenges. Here the concept, origin, models, dimensions, practices, challenges, solutions, and future of democracy are dealt to understand the structure of ideal democracy. Keywords: democracy, human rights, rule of law, sustainable development, election Methodology The methodology applied in maintaining this research paper includes documentary analysis qualitatively where different journals, public documents, organizational reports, articles, and books are referred, and their factual data are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Reacting to Donald Trump's Challenge
    centro studi per i popoli extra-europei “cesare bonacossa” - università di pavia The Journal of the Italian think tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989 Vol. XXIX / 2018 Reacting to Donald Trump’s Challenge Edited by Michelguglielmo Torri Nicola Mocci viella centro studi per i popoli extra-europei “cesare bonacossa” - università di pavia ASIA MAIOR The Journal of the Italian think tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989 Vol. XXIX / 2018 Reacting to Donald Trump’s Challenge Edited by Michelguglielmo Torri and Nicola Mocci viella Asia Maior. The Journal of the Italian Think Tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989. Copyright © 2019 - Viella s.r.l. & Associazione Asia Maior ISBN 978-88-3313-241-9 (Paper) ISBN 978-88-3313-242-6 (Online) ISSN 2385-2526 (Paper) ISSN 2612-6680 (Online) Annual journal - Vol. XXIX, 2018 This journal is published jointly by the think tank Asia Maior (Associazione Asia Maior) & CSPE - Centro Studi per i Popoli extra-europei «Cesare Bonacossa», University of Pavia Asia Maior. The Journal of the Italian Think Tank on Asia founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989 is an open-access journal, whose issues and single articles can be freely downloaded from the think tank webpage: www.asiamaior.org. Paper version Italy € 50.00 Abroad € 65.00 Subscription [email protected] www.viella.it Editorial board Editor-in-chief (direttore responsabile): Michelguglielmo Torri, University of Turin. Co-editor: Nicola Mocci, University of Sassari. associate editors: Axel Berkofsky, University of Pavia; Diego Maiorano, National University of Singapore, ISAS - Institute of South Asian Studies; Nicola Mocci, University of Sassari; Giulio Pugliese, King’s College London; Michelguglielmo Torri, University of Turin; Elena Valdameri, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology - ETh Zurich; Pierluigi Valsecchi, University of Pavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    No. 43 Working Papers Working Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India‘s Role in Nepal‘s Recent Constitution-Making Process Prakash Bhattarai December 2018 1 Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India’s Role in Nepal’s Recent Constitution-Making Process1 Prakash Bhattarai ABSTRACT Nepal’s post-conflict constitution-making process has seen the involvement of many international actors. While studies on democracy promotion, to this day, mainly focus on Western “donors” and international organizations, this paper looks at the role played by India in the complicated process of moving from a peace agreement to the establishment of an inclusive, democratic constitution in Nepal. More specifically, it is analysed how a powerful neighbouring democracy (India) participated in what is essentially a domestic negotiation process (constitution-making) with a view to influencing the emerging demo- cratic regime. In terms of the issues on the negotiation table, the analysis shows that India, in pushing for an inclusive constitution, pursued the specific agenda of supporting the inclusion of the Madheshis, an ethnic group mostly living in Nepal’s Terai region. In terms of negotiation strategies, the paper identifies four different ways in which India tried to influence the constitution: high-level dialogue; economic blockade; international coalition building; and targeted support of domestic oppositional forces in Nepal. Com- prehensive as this negotiation strategy was, it only met with partial success. Parameters that limited India’s influence included the domestic strength and legitimacy of the official Nepali position (elite alignment; popular support) as well as scepticism concerning In- dia’s role in Nepal, which was reinforced by India’s overly partisan agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Prime Minister and the Leader of Nepali Delegation Right Honorable Mr. K P Sharma Oli at the General Debate Of
    Statement by Prime Minister and the Leader of Nepali Delegation Right Honorable Mr. K P Sharma Oli at the General Debate of the 75th Session of United Nations General Assembly New York, 25 September 2020 Theme: -The future we want, the United Nations we need: reaffirming our collective commitment to multilateralism - confronting COVID-19 through effective multilateral action Mr. President Excellencies the Heads of State and Government, Mr. Secretary General, Distinguished delegates: I extend warm greetings to you all from Nepal, the land of Gautam Buddha and Sagarmatha, also known as the Mount Everest. I join with other leaders in expressing our profound grief and agony on the loss of lives around the world due to COVID-19, including in my own country. I congratulate you, Mr. President, and other members of the Bureau on your election and assure you of Nepal’s full support. 1 The outgoing President deserves our appreciation for successfully steering the 74th Session of the Assembly. We commend the Secretary General, Mr. Antonio Guterres, for his tireless efforts to enable the UN deliver at this difficult time. Mr. President, We are passing through an extraordinary time. The COVID-19 pandemic is confronting us as a crisis of epic proportion. Be it the magnitude of public health crisis, impact on livelihoods and societies or global economic recession, the fallouts of the pandemic have been colossal. We support the efforts of the United Nations, World Health Organization and the World Bank Group in leading the global response to the pandemic. In particular, we commend the UN Secretary General for launching the Comprehensive Response to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Kulekhani I Hydropower Station
    MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGING DIRECTOR I would like to express my sincere greetings to the Generation Directorate on the publication of its 12th edition of NEA “Generation Directorate Magazine” on the occasion of the 35th anniversary of Nepal Electricity Authority. I believe the precious data presented herein will be useful to the NEA stakeholders as well as the general public. The total installed capacity of the NEA owned power plants is 626.70 MW (20 hydro and 2 thermal) out of total 1332.86 MW in INPS. The annual generation from these power plants is 3011.43 GWh, which is 50.09% of the total energy generation in Nepal. Upper Trishuli 3A (60 MW) was inaugurated by Rt. Hon’ble Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli on 18 Nov, 2019. The long awaited cascade type Hydro power project, Kulekhani-III (14 MW) also started generation from 11 Oct, 2019. The taking over of this plant is still on hold due to the Covid-19 pandemic as well as a few other liabilities that need to be accomplished by the Contractor. Major rehabilitation or overhauling works were carried out in Kaligandaki A (including SCADA/ Control system upgradation), Middle Marsyangdi, Marsyangdi, Kulekhani- I & II, Sunkoshi, Modi, Trishuli, Devighat and Puwakhola HPS, even during the lockdown imposed by the government and the continued pandemic. This has ultimately resulted in minimizing generation outage due to breakdowns. These regular and timely maintenance has made Generation Directorate capable of supplying reliable and continuous energy to national grid. Finally, I’m thankful to all the employees working in the power plants, their plant managers and the entire team in Generation Directorate for putting in all the hard work to achieve the desired result.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Pm Kp Sharma Oli Expelled from Ncp
    NEPAL PM KP SHARMA OLI EXPELLED FROM NCP NEPAL PM KP SHARMA OLI EXPELLED FROM NCP EDITORIAL ARTICLES - https://www.successmantra.in/blog/post/article/editorial95 Nepal PM KP Sharma Oli has been expelled from the ruling Nepal Communist Party (NCP) over his decision to dissolve the Parliament. The Prime Minister was removed from the party by a Central Committee at a meeting of the party's splinter group held on January 24, 2021. The decision comes amid repeated threats by the rival faction leaders who had said that they would revoke Oli's membership over his decision to dissolve the Nepal Parliament. The rival faction spokesperson Narayankaji Shrestha said that the party leaders are planning further action against Oli after his ouster from the party. ABOUT THE RECENT ISSUE (PM OLI EXPELLED) The splinter group led by former Prime Ministers Pushpa Kamal Dahal and Madhav Kumar had earlier asked PM Oli for explanation for his unconstitutional decisions. The faction had event sent a letter to the Prime Minister's residence to seek clarification. However, PM Oli did not respond to the letter. The rival faction spokesperson said that they waited for long for a reply from the Prime Minister but he didn't reply to them. He added that the latest decision was taken by exercising the executive rights provided by the Central Committee of the party. Decisions by both factions didn’t come in line with party’s statute, so can’t update Nepal Communist Party's details. We've notified KP Oli & Pushpa Kamal Dahal, making it clear that Commission will maintain party's existing details ONGOING POLITICAL CRISIS IN NEPAL Recently, Nepal has drifted into a political crisis following its Prime Minister (PM) KP Sharma Oli’s decision to dissolve Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Hon'ble Commerce Minister of Bangladesh As The
    H. E. Tipu Munshi, MP Hon’ble Commerce Minister Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Guest of Honour and Keynote Speaker at the Inaugural Ceremony of the 55th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FNCCI) and Industry Commerce Day 10 April 2021 Statement by Hon’ble Commerce Minister of Bangladesh as the Guest of Honour and Keynote Speaker at the Inaugural Ceremony of the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FNCCI)’s 55th Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Industry Commerce Day, 10 April 2021 (Virtual) Excellency Mr. K. P. Sharma Oli, Right Honourable Prime Minister of Nepal and the Chief Guest of the Inaugural Ceremony, Distinguished Ministers, Mr. Shekhar Golchha, President, FNCCI, Distinguished guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, Let me first thank the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FNCCI) for inviting me at the Inaugural Ceremony of the 55th AGM of FNCCI which is also celebrated as the Industry Commerce Day. I feel honored to be invited as the key note speaker in a program where the Right Hon’ble Prime Minister of Nepal is present as the Chief Guest. I had been eagerly waiting for this event, but I had to cancel the visit because of the recent surge of the pandemic in Bangladesh. Nepal, the daughter of the Himalayas, has got the highest peak on earth and the range of sky-touching mountains have made this country amazingly beautiful. The natural and cultural beauty of Nepal has created a special place in my heart. But unfortunately, I missed out to enjoy the beauty this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Overview of the Political Situation, Including Information on the Treatment of Political Party Members and Supporters by Opponents (2010-2011)
    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIRs | Help 11 January 2012 NPL103942.E Nepal: Overview of the political situation, including information on the treatment of political party members and supporters by opponents (2010-2011) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa Political Developments, 2010-2011 In 2010 and 2011, media sources and specialists in Nepali politics described the political situation in Nepal as a "political deadlock" (Xinhua 29 Nov. 2010; The Kathmandu Post 29 Nov. 2010; BBC 26 May 2011; AFP 29 Aug. 2011; The Telegraph 2 Nov. 2011; Freedom House 2011). Numerous sources have noted the challenges posed by the lack of consensus between political parties (Time 17 Aug. 2011; BBC 26 May 2011), as well as within them (ibid.; International Crisis Group 13 Dec. 2011, 1, 3; Freedom House 2011). For example, Nepal's legislature, the Constituent Assembly, was elected in 2008 and tasked with drafting a new constitution (UN 30 Aug. 2011; Freedom House 2011; AFP 29 Aug. 2011). Its deadline to produce a constitution has passed and been extended four times: in May 2010, May 2011, August 2011 (UN 30 Aug. 2011), and November 2011 (The Hindu 29 Nov. 2011). According to media sources, the Supreme Court has ruled that the fourth extension will be the last (ibid.; The Kathmandu Post 25 Nov. 2011) and that the Constituent Assembly will be dissolved if it fails to draft a constitution (ibid.). The final deadline has been set for May 2012 (The Hindu 29 Nov. 2011). In June 2010, Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, of the Unified Marxist- Leninist party (CPN-UML [or UML]) (Human Rights Watch Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight-Point Agreement of the Top Leaders (Press Statement)
    Eight-point Agreement of the top leaders (Press Statement) Meeting of the top leaders of Seven Political Parties and CPN (Maoists) has been held in the Prime Minister's residence at Baluwatar today, on 16 June 2006 on the auspicious organization of the Government - Maoists Negotiating Team. The points reached in agreement in the meeting are as follow:- 1. To implement effectively and honestly the 12-points understanding reached between the Seven Political Parties and the CPN (Maoists) on November 23, 2005 and the 25-points Code of Conduct on Ceasefire reached in agreement between the Government of Nepal and CPN (Maoists) and made public by the Government -Maoist Negotiating team on 26 May 2006. 2. To express the commitment to democratic norms and values including competitive multi-party governance system, civic liberties, fundamental rights, human rights, press freedom, and the concept of rule of law, and carry out each other’s activities accordingly in a peaceful manner. 3. To request the United Nations to assist in the management of the armies and arms of both the parties and to monitor them for a free and fair election of the Constituent Assembly. 4. To frame an interim constitution to form an interim government accordingly; announce the date of the election for constituent assembly to dissolve the House of Representatives by making another alternative arrangement through consensus and to dissolve the People’s Governments formed by the CPN (Maoists). by ensuring the democratic rights achieved through the Peoples Movement in 1990 and the recent historic People’s Movement, and by making base to the commitment 1 expressed in the 12-points understanding and the spirit of the preamble of the Code of Conduct on Ceasefire; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Major Political Events in Contemporary Nepal
    Chronology of major political events in contemporary Nepal 1846–1951 1962 Nepal is ruled by hereditary prime ministers from the Rana clan Mahendra introduces the Partyless Panchayat System under with Shah kings as figureheads. Prime Minister Padma Shamsher a new constitution which places the monarch at the apex of power. promulgates the country’s first constitution, the Government of Nepal The CPN separates into pro-Moscow and pro-Beijing factions, Act, in 1948 but it is never implemented. beginning the pattern of splits and mergers that has continued to the present. 1951 1963 An armed movement led by the Nepali Congress (NC) party, founded in India, ends Rana rule and restores the primacy of the Shah The 1854 Muluki Ain (Law of the Land) is replaced by the new monarchy. King Tribhuvan announces the election to a constituent Muluki Ain. The old Muluki Ain had stratified the society into a rigid assembly and introduces the Interim Government of Nepal Act 1951. caste hierarchy and regulated all social interactions. The most notable feature was in punishment – the lower one’s position in the hierarchy 1951–59 the higher the punishment for the same crime. Governments form and fall as political parties tussle among 1972 themselves and with an increasingly assertive palace. Tribhuvan’s son, Mahendra, ascends to the throne in 1955 and begins Following Mahendra’s death, Birendra becomes king. consolidating power. 1974 1959 A faction of the CPN announces the formation The first parliamentary election is held under the new Constitution of CPN–Fourth Congress. of the Kingdom of Nepal, drafted by the palace.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Proclaims Itself a 'Federal Democratic Republic'
    nepal Nepal proclaims itself a ‘federal democratic republic’ But whether it definitely becomes one is to be decided in April BY AJAYA BHADRA KHanaL N December 2007, Nepal’S interim legislature proclaimed itself “a federal democratic republican state.” Nepal had previously Federations Iamended its constitution to become fed- eral in March 2007, but this bill abolished the monarchy as well. For this poor, land- locked former kingdom in the mountains and foothills of the Himalayas, such a 2008 change would be a huge step. Nepal, H C sandwiched between India and China, R has few natural resources beyond quartz, hydroelectric power, timber and scenery. | MA After a 10-year civil war that drastically RY A hurt tourism and other industries, all RU parties were eager for peace. The monarchists, once one of three FEB main political forces in Nepal (along with the Nepali Congress Party and the Communists), have dwindled into a minor political movement. The monar- chy’s popularity sank after the death of King Birendra in a notorious palace mas- sacre in 2001. After his brother Gyanendra dissolved parliament and took control to battle Maoist insurgents in the civil war, human rights abuses by the government turned many against the king. The resolution in parliament that abolished the monarchy was passed by 270 votes to 3, with 56 abstentions. The vote must still be confirmed by a special PHO AP T constituent assembly to be elected on O/ April 10 to draft a new constitution. bin OD JO OD S H An unlikely choice I With an average Nepali earning less than The end of the road for Nepal’s King Gyanendra came on Dec.
    [Show full text]