DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Efficacy and Nontarget Effects of the Mosquito Larvicides Temephos, Methoprene, and Bacillus Thuringiensis Var

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Efficacy and Nontarget Effects of the Mosquito Larvicides Temephos, Methoprene, and Bacillus Thuringiensis Var Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 15(4):446_452,1999 Copyright O 1999 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. FIELD EFFICACY AND NONTARGET EFFECTS OF THE MOSQUITO LARVICIDES TEMEPHOS, METHOPRENE, AND BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS VAR. ISRAELENSISIN FLORIDA MANGROVE SWAMPS SHARON P LAWLER,' TRULS JENSEN,,., DEBORAH A. DRITZ, ,qNo GEoRGE WICHTERMANI ABSTRACT. We compared the efficacy and nontarget effects of temephos, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israe- (B.t'i.), lensis and methoprene applied by helicopter to control mosquito larvae in mangrove ,*u-p, on Sanibel Island, FL, in May 1997. Three sites per treatment and 3 untreated sites were used. Temephos (Abate@) was applied at 37 mllha (43Vo active ingredient tAIl), B.t.i. granules (Vectobac G@.; were uppii.d ut 5.606 kg/ha (200 International Toxic Units/mg), and methoprene (Altosid@ ALL) was applied at213 ni/ha (5vo AI). EffiJacy was quantified by monitoring the survival of caged and uncaged larval Aides taeniorhynchus. We quantified mortality of sentinel nontarget amphipods (Talitridae) at all sites, monitored the effect bf temephos on flying arthropods using light traps, and collected dead insects in tarps suspended under mangroves in areas treated with either temephos or methoprene. Each pesticide showed good overall efficacy but occasional failures occurred. No detectable mortality of amphipods or flying insects attributable to pesticides was found. The inconsistent field efficacies of the pesticides indicate a need for reinspection of treated sites in this habitat. KEY WORDS B.r.i., Abate@, Altosid@, mosquito control, Aedes taeniorhynchus INTRODUCTION safe for vertebrates at levels used in mosquito con- trol, but vary in risk to invertebrates. Temephos is Coastal marshes and mangrove swamps are often an organophosphate pesticide that acts by inhibiting managed for mosquito control because salt-marsh cholinesterase, and it is toxic to insects and some mosquitoes can emerge in numbers that threaten the other nontarget invertebrates (Smith 1987, Brown health of humans and livestock. The salt-marsh et al. 1996).The bacterium B.t.i. is a microbial in- mosquito Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann) can secticide. It controls mosquitoes with toxins whose make our study area, Sanibel Island, FL, nearly un- action is specific to nematoceran dipterans (e.g., inhabitable, and it can harm livestock (Addison and mosquitoes and black flies), and is expected to have Ritchie 1993). Aedes taeniorhynchus c^n fly long little effect on other macroinvertebrates (Back et al. distances to obtain blood meals (Ritchie and Mon- 1985, Federici 1995). Methoprene is similar in tague 1995), so one of the best methods of con- structure to insect juvenile hormone, and it causes trolling this species is to kill the larvae in local mortality in mosquitoes by interfering with meta- breeding sites before they disperse as adults. Aedes morphosis. Although the action of methoprene is taeniorhynchzs larvae develop in temporary pools not specific to mosquitoes, many insects are insen- that form in depressions above the upper intertidal sitive to the levels of methoprene used in mosquito zone in mangrove swamps and salt marshes. They control (Hershey et al. 1995, but see Gelbic et al. often occur in such large numbers that emergence 1994). Methoprene is not expected to affect adult of even a small percentage of the population can insects. Methoprene and B.t.i. were recently re- create problems for residents. Because salt marshes ported to have negative indirect effects on preda- tory insects (Hershey and mangrove swamps are productive habitats that et al. 1998). However, de- clines of predators occurred only after 2-3 years of sustain a variety of wildlife (review, Mitsch and frequent application of the materials at maximum Gosselink 1993), environmentally sound mosquito label rates, and no such effects have been docu- management is a conservation priority. We con- mented during normal use of these materials. ducted a large-scale field study on 3 larvicides, te- This study offers a side-by-side comparison of mephos, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (de the field efflcacy of the pesticides when applied by Barjac) (B.t.i.), and methoprene, to assess whether aircraft to swamps composed of mangroves and these larvicides could control mosquitoes in man- grasses. To compare the nontarget effects of the grove areas without causing substantial mortality of pesticides, we monitored the survival of a common nontarget amphipods and canopy insects. amphipod (Talitridae) in treated and control sites. The 3 pesticides have different modes of action We also tested whether temephos would kill inver- and expected nontarget effects. All are relatively tebrates inhabiting the mangrove canopy. Nontarget insects in the mangrove canopy could be affected by aerial applications of temephos because it is a I Department of Entomology, University of Califomia contact poison. at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. 2 Present address: 3721 E Vermilion Avenue, Kanab, uT 84741. MATERIALS AND METHODS r Lee County Mosquito Control District, PO 60005, Study sites: The study was conducted in May Fort Mvers. FL 33906. 1997, during the 1st larviciding operations of that 446 DeceNanen1999 Epp'ecrs op Tnngn LARVICIDESrN MeNcnovgs 447 Fisherman's Key qt/ 4 1fl-\^L r Sanibel Island - 1 Kilometer Fig., 1. Map of a study area, Sanibel Island, FL, showing the location of mangrove areas treated with mosquito control pesticides or used as controls. Sites ranged in size from 3.2 to 2i.6 ha. Treitments correspond to symbois as follows: r?r temephos, ) Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis, I methoprene. I control. year. We established 11 study sites on Sanibel Is- quitoes in treated sites using dippers. We evaluated land plus one on nearby Fisherman's Key (Fig. l). whether temephos would affect terrestrial insects Sites ranged in size from 3.2 to 2i.6 ha. The dom- by comparing insect collections from sites treated inant species in all areas were red mangrove (Rftl- with temephos to sites that were either untreated or lophora mangle (L.)) and black mangrove (Avicen- treated with methoprene. Details are given below. nia germinans (L.)), with a few areas of srasses Pesticide application: Lee County Mosquito or white mangroves (Laguncularia raJemosa Control District personnel applied all pesticides by (Gaertn)) in some sites. These sites typically flood helicopter, and cleaned application gear between during high-tide cycles that coincide with onshore applications of different materials. The B.t.i. srarl- winds, and the water usually disappears within sev- ules (Vectobac G@, Abbott Laboratories, Iiorth eral days (G. Wichterman, personal communica- Chicago, IL) were applied on May 14, 1997, at a tion). All sites flooded with rain and tide warers rate of 5.606 kg/tra (200 International Toxic Units during a storm on May 12, 1997, and lst-stage Ae. per mg; 5 lb/acre). Temephos and methoprene were taeniorhynchus appeared the next day. Each larvi- applied on May 15, 1997, except for I application cide was applied to 3 sites and 3 control sites were of temephos to Fisherman's Key on May 16, 1997. not treated. Control sites flooded simultaneouslv Temephos (Abate@, Clarke Mosquito Control prod- with treated sites but produced few mosquitoes. WL ucts, Roselle, IL) was applied at 37 mllha (43Vo were unable to assign control sites at random with active ingredient [AI]; O.5 fl oz./acre). Methoprene respect to the presence of mosquitoes, because even (Altosido ALL, Wellmark International, Benson- small untreated areas can produce enorrnous num- ville, IL) was applied at 213 mllha (5Vo AI, 3 oz./ bers of mosquitoes that attack nearby residents. acre). One B.t.i. site was retreated with temephos We sampled study sites on the day before pesti- after 2 days to prevent emergence of mosquitoes cide application and on the subsequent 6 days. At that survived the B.t.i. application. all sites, we monitored survival of caged mosquito Sentinels: We used field-collected Ae. taenior- larvae and amphipods, and sampled uncaged mos- hynchus larvae and amphipods in the family Tali- 448 JounNll or rHe AlarntcaN Mosquno CoNrnol AssocnrroN VoL. 15,No.4 tridae as sentinels to monitor insecticide activity. that insects were too sparse in the mangrove canopy Aedes taeniorhynchus and the amphipods were the for effective sampling by sweep net (15 canopy only aquatic macroinvertebrates consistently pres- sweeps typically yielded fewer than 4 insects). ent in study sites after flooding, probably because Therefore, we tested whether temephos affected fly- the habitat is ephemeral. Other aquatic macroinver- ing insect abundance by collecting insects with tebrates occasionally observed during field work Centers for Disease Control light traps (CDC traps) were fiddler crabs, water boatmen (Corixidae), and and ultraviolet light rraps (UV traps) in 2 sites treat- dytiscid beetles. Sentinels were held in floating ed with temephos (Wulfert's Point and West Im- predator-exclusion cages. Cages were 1.9-liter plas- poundment Swale), and in 2 sites that are not larv- tic buckets that were suspended in the water by a icided (Pole Line and Tarpon Bay). We placed 2 ring of styrofoam and attached to a stake by string. CDC traps and 1 UV trap in each site, at least 20 Cages had 2 screened windows measuring 5 X 10.5 m apart. The vegetation was thick in these areas cm, and had screened lids that were removed dur- and so it is unlikely that the traps attracted insects ing insecticide applications. Before pesticide appli- from outside the designated sites. We could not see cation on May 14, 25 2nd-stage mosquito larvae from 1 trap to the next and had to follow flagged were placed in each of 2 cages per site, and 25 trails to find them. However, insects were free to amphipods were placed in each of 2 cages per site. fly in and out of sites during the study.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Limits of Rift Valley Fever Revealed Using
    Environmental limits of Rift Valley fever revealed using ecoepidemiological mechanistic models Giovanni Lo Iaconoa,b,c,1, Andrew A. Cunninghamd, Bernard Bette, Delia Gracee, David W. Reddingf, and James L. N. Wooda aDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Disease Dynamics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, United Kingdom; bPublic Health England, Didcot, Oxford OX11 0RQ, United Kingdom; cSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, United Kingdom; dInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, United Kingdom; eAnimal and Human Health Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya; and fCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom Edited by Burton H. Singer, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, and approved June 19, 2018 (received for review February 23, 2018) Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) of humans and domestic animals These issues provide the basis of the work reported here. We are a significant component of the global burden of disease and focus on Rift Valley fever (RVF), an important mosquito-borne a key driver of poverty. The transmission cycles of VBDs are viral zoonosis. The causative virus is responsible for major epi- often strongly mediated by the ecological requirements of the demics in Africa, and its range seems to be expanding as shown by vectors, resulting in complex transmission dynamics, including phylogeographic analysis (6) and recent epidemic occurrence in intermittent epidemics and an unclear link between environmen- Saudi Arabia and Yemen (7–10). Furthermore, concern has been tal conditions and disease persistence. An important broader raised about the potential for environmental/climatic changes concern is the extent to which theoretical models are reliable at causing increased impact of RVF in endemic areas or facilitat- forecasting VBDs; infection dynamics can be complex, and the ing its spread to new regions of the world (10–12).
    [Show full text]
  • T3-B1-Mosquitoecology.Pdf
    Suffolk County Vector Control and Wetlands Management Long-Term Plan Literature Review Task Three – Book 1 -- Long Island Mosquitoes October 2004 SUFFOLK COUNTY LONG TERM PLAN The Consultant Team Cashin, Associates, P.C. Hauppauge, NY Subconsultants Cameron Engineering, L.L.P. Syosset, NY Integral Consulting Annapolis, MD Bowne Management Systems, Inc. Mineola, NY Kamazima Lwiza, PhD University at Stony Brook, NY Ducks Unlimited Stony Brook, NY Steven Goodbred, PhD & Laboratory University at Stony Brook, NY RTP Environmental Westbury, NY Sinnreich, Safar & Kosakoff Central Islip, NY Bruce Brownawell, PhD & Laboratory University at Stony Brook, NY Anne McElroy, PhD & Laboratory University at Stony Brook, NY Andrew Spielman, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Richard Pollack, PhD Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Wayne Crans, PhD Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Susan Teitelbaum, PhD Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY Zawicki Vector Management Consultants Freehold, NJ Robert Turner, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Christopher Gobler, PhD & Laboratory Southampton College, NY Jerome Goddard, PhD Mississippi Department of Health, Jackson, MS Sergio Sanudo, PhD & Laboratory University of Stony Brook, NY Suffolk County Department of Health Hauppauge, NY Services, Division of Environmental Quality Project Management Richard LaValle, P.E., Chief Deputy Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Commissioner Yaphank, NY Vito Minei, P.E., Director, Division of Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Environmental Quality Hauppauge, NY Walter Dawydiak, Jr., P.E., J.D., Chief Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Engineer, Division of Environmental Hauppauge, NY Quality Dominick Ninivaggi, Superintendent, Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Division of Vector Control Yaphank, NY Cashin Associates, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Cdc Light Trap, Bg Sentinel Trap, and Mmx Trap for the Collection of Salt Marsh Mosquitoes in Anastasia State Park, Saint Augustine, Florida
    EVALUATION OF CDC LIGHT TRAP, BG SENTINEL TRAP, AND MMX TRAP FOR THE COLLECTION OF SALT MARSH MOSQUITOES IN ANASTASIA STATE PARK, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA DANIEL DIXON1, JOSEPH D’AMATO, AND RUI-DE XUE Anastasia Mosquito Control District, 120 EOC Drive, Saint Augustine, FL 32092 Current address: USDA/CMAVE, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608 Guest Editor: Emad Khater ABSTRACT Salt marsh mosquitoes are major nuisance pests during the periods of high mosquito activity, especially after major storm events. In 2016-2017, Saint John’s County, Florida, USA was struck by two major hurricanes that resulted in multiple outbreaks of salt marsh mosquito populations. To optimize the surveillance of two salt marsh mosquitoes, (Aedes taeniorhynchus and Ae. sollicitans, three types of traps (the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Light trap, Bio- gents Sentinel (BG) trap and Counter Flow Geometry Model (MMX) trap were tested for their capacity to capture the highest numbers of high quality live specimens for laboratory bioassays. Each trap type was tested in Anastasia State Park, located along a major salt marsh area in Saint John’s County. Although the MMX trap captured most of the salt marsh mosquitoes collected, the numbers of mosquitoes captured was not statistically significant compared to the other trap types. However, there was a significant difference in the numbers betweenAe. taeniorhynchus and Ae. sollicitans in the MMX traps. The MMX trap is preferred for capturing salt marsh mosquitoes that are in high quality for the CDC bottle bioassays. Key Words: Aedes taeniorhynchus, Aedes sollicitans, surveillance, salt marsh, CDC light trap Salt marsh mosquitoes are nuisance St.
    [Show full text]
  • Elife-58511-V1.Pdf (4.597Mb)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Transmission of West Nile and five other temperate mosquito-borne viruses peaks at temperatures between 23˚C and 26˚C Marta S Shocket1,2*, Anna B Verwillow1, Mailo G Numazu1, Hani Slamani3, Jeremy M Cohen4,5, Fadoua El Moustaid6, Jason Rohr4,7, Leah R Johnson3,6, Erin A Mordecai1 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States; 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; 3Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, United States; 4Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, United States; 5Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States; 6Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, United States; 7Department of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute of Global Health, Environmental Change Initiative, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, United States Abstract The temperature-dependence of many important mosquito-borne diseases has never been quantified. These relationships are critical for understanding current distributions and predicting future shifts from climate change. We used trait-based models to characterize temperature-dependent transmission of 10 vector–pathogen pairs of mosquitoes (Culex pipiens, Cx. quinquefascsiatus, Cx. tarsalis, and others) and viruses (West Nile, Eastern and Western Equine Encephalitis, St. Louis Encephalitis, Sindbis, and Rift Valley Fever viruses), most with substantial transmission in temperate regions. Transmission is optimized at intermediate temperatures (23–26˚ *For correspondence: C) and often has wider thermal breadths (due to cooler lower thermal limits) compared to [email protected] pathogens with predominately tropical distributions (in previous studies).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes and the Disease They Transmit
    ENTO-040 3/16 Mosquitoes and the Diseases They Transmit Sonja L. Swiger, Assistant Professor and Extension Entomologist The Texas A&M University System osquitoes affect the health of people and Larva animals more than any other insect pest Figure 1. Mosquito M lifeFigure cycle, 1. including worldwide. Biting female mosquitoes transmit Egg theMosqui egg, tolarval, life many infectious agents that cause diseases such raft pupal,cycle, andincluding adult as encephalitis, malaria, dengue, chikungunya, stages.the egg, Source: larv al,Molly Zika virus, and yellow fever. Mosquito popula- Keckpupal, and adult Pupa stages.Sour ce: tions exist throughout Texas, and some species Molly Keck are known to be disease vectors (carriers). To control mosquitoes the most effectively Adult and economically, you need to: • Understand their life cycle • Be able to identify the mosquito species in At least 85 species of mosquitoes occur in your area Texas. They vary considerably in larval breed- • Know the management steps that provide ing sites, time of day when they bite, and flight the best control for different species and at distances of the adults. Table 1 summarizes this specific locations information for the most common Texas species. It can be difficult to identify some species Identifying mosquitoes of mosquitoes at the larval or adult stages. To Adult mosquitoes are small, long-legged flies determine the species in your area, send samples that have two wings. They are distinguished to an identification lab or contact a mosquito from all other flies by three characteristics: control district, university, or pest control oper- • Long, many-segmented antennae ator.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Rift Valley Fever Virus Spillover to Humans During the Mayotte 2018–2019 Epidemic
    Estimation of Rift Valley fever virus spillover to humans during the Mayotte 2018–2019 epidemic Raphaëlle Métrasa,b,c,d,1, W. John Edmundsd, Chouanibou Youssouffie, Laure Dommerguesf, Guillaume Fourniég, Anton Camachod,h, Sebastian Funkd, Eric Cardinaleb,i, Gilles Le Godaisj, Soihibou Comboj, Laurent Filleulk, Hassani Youssoufk,2, and Marion Subirosk,2 aINSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé 1136), 75012 Paris, France; bCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques, et Écosystèmes, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France; cAnimal, Santé, Territoires, Risques, et Écosystèmes, I site Montpellier Université d’Excellence (I-MUSE), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, 34398 Montpellier, France; dCentre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; eGroupement de Défense Sanitaire Mayotte - Coopérative des Eleveurs Mahorais, Division Santé Animale, 97670 Coconi, Mayotte, France; fLa Coopération Agricole, Division Santé Animale, F-75538 Paris, France; gVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield AL9 7TA, United Kingdom; hEpicentre, Research Department, 75019 Paris, France; iCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques, et Écosystèmes, F-97490 Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France; jDirection de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Forêt de Mayotte, Service de l’Alimentation, 97600 Mamoudzou, France; and kSanté Publique France, Cellule Mayotte de Santé publique France, 97600 Mamoudzou, France Edited by Tilahun D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California
    The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California Vector Control Technician Certification Training Manual Category B 1/10 Instructions This study guide is meant to replace the manual The Biology and Control of Mosquitoes in California. • You can navigate through the guide at your own pace and in any order. • Click on the purple home button to return to the main menu. • Click on the gray return button to go to the chapter menu of the current slide. • Click on the button if you want to access the glossary. Important terms are highlighted in red and appear in the glossary. The link to the glossary can be found at the beginning of each chapter. 2/10 Main Menu Chapter 1: Biology of Mosquitoes Chapter 2: Ecology of Mosquitoes Chapter 3: Public Health Importance of Mosquitoes Chapter 4: Classification and Identification of Mosquitoes Chapter 5: Principles of Mosquito Control Chapter 6: Chemical Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 7: Physical Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 8: Biological Control of Mosquitoes Chapter 9: Mosquito Control in California Chapter 10: Surveillance for Mosquitoes and Mosquito-borne Diseases Chapter 11: Public Relations in Mosquito Control Appendix 1: Glossary 2 :Conversions of Units and Formulas used with Insecticides 3 :Additional Information 3/10 Introduction • Arthropods are a huge group of invertebrate animals (animals without backbones) that include insects, arachnids (ticks, mites, and spiders), crustaceans (crabs, lobsters, and shrimp) and others. • There are millions of species of arthropods, all sharing characteristics of a hard exoskeleton and jointed legs. • Many arthropods are pests of one kind or another, especially on agricultural crops and farm animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovipositional Site Preference of Aedes Sollicitans (Walker) for Select Marsh Plants
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1979 Ovipositional Site Preference of Aedes Sollicitans (Walker) for Select Marsh Plants. Michael Kenneth Carroll Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Carroll, Michael Kenneth, "Ovipositional Site Preference of Aedes Sollicitans (Walker) for Select Marsh Plants." (1979). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3385. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3385 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection of Aedes Sollicitans and Aedes Taeniorhynchus with Two Chimeric Sindbis/Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Candidates
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 78(1), 2008, pp. 93–97 Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Experimental Infection of Aedes sollicitans and Aedes taeniorhynchus with Two Chimeric Sindbis/Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Candidates Nicole C. Arrigo,* Douglas M. Watts, Ilya Frolov, and Scott C. Weaver Department of Pathology, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas Abstract. Two chimeric vaccine candidates for Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) were developed by in- serting the structural protein genes of either a North American (NA) or South American (SA) EEEV into a Sindbis virus (SINV) backbone. To assess the effect of chimerization on mosquito infectivity, experimental infections of two potential North American bridge vectors of EEEV, Aedes sollicitans and Ae. taeniorhynchus, were attempted. Both species were susceptible to oral infection with all viruses after ingestion of high titer blood meals of ca. 7.0 log10 plaque-forming units/mL. Dissemination rates for SIN/NAEEEV (0 of 56) and SIN/SAEEEV (1 of 54) were low in Ae. taeniorhynchus and no evidence of transmission potential was observed. In contrast, the chimeras disseminated more efficiently in Ae. sollicitans (19 of 68 and 13 of 57, respectively) and were occasionally detected in the saliva of this species. These results indicate that chimerization of the vaccine candidates reduces infectivity. However, its impact on dissemination
    [Show full text]
  • Ochlerotatus Taeniorhynchus
    Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus Entomologist Challenge! Gabrielle Sakolsky Cape Cod Mosquito Control Slide added for clarificaon: • Habits similar to Oc sollicitans • Aggressive day>me mammal biters • Large host seeking flight range > 5 miles • Mul>vol>ne Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project was the first organized mosquito control project in the Commonwealth of MassachuseKs. The Project was organized by businesses and chamber of commerce in response to large salt marsh mosquito populaons. Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus 1. Salt marsh 2. No stripe on abdomen 3. Banded proboscis 4. Hind tarsi banded at the base 5. Wing scales all dark Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus Photograph by Michelle Cutwa, University of Florida. Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus Photograph by Michelle Cutwa, University of Florida. Vector Competency in New England: (preferen>al mammal biters) - West Nile virus : potential, not significant - Eastern Equine encephalitis: potential, not significant - Dog heartworm : important vector Light Trap Locaons Saltmarsh Mosquitoes Trapped in Barnstable County : 1992-2018 900 800 700 600 500 Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus 400 Ochlerotatus sollicitans Number of Mosquitoes 300 200 100 0 Oc taeniorhynchus trapped in Barnstable County: 1992-2015 160 140 120 100 80 Oc taeniorhynchus 60 40 20 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources: Andreadis, T. et al. 2005. Iden6fica6on Guide to the Mosquitoes of Conneccut. Conneccut Agricultural Experiment Sta6on. Apperson, C. 1991. The black salt marsh mosquito, Aedes taeniorhynchus Wing Beats, Vol. 2(4):9. Carpenter, S.J. and W. J. Lacasse. 1955. Mosquitoes Of North America. Berkley and Los Angeles, CA. University of California Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito Problems After a Storm
    ER-042 8-08 Mosquito Problems after a Storm Mark M. Johnsen, Texas AgriLife Extension Service, The Texas A&M System After a severe storm, mosquito populations can explode, and the diseases they carry can be a danger to humans. Mosquito problems occur in two distinct waves after a flood. The first to arrive are the flood water mos- quitoes, which include the salt marsh (Aedes taeniorhynchus, Aedes sol- licitans) and pastureland mosquitoes (Psorophora columbiae, Psorophora cyanescens, Aedes vexans). These mosquito species deposit their eggs on the soil in areas that are flooded periodically. When flooded, the eggs hatch 5 to 7 days later, resulting in large swarms of mosquitoes during the warmest times of the year. Most of the common flood water mosquitoes do not cause disease prob- lems. But two of them are a danger—Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mos- quito) and Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito). They lay their eggs in cans, children’s toys, tires, potted plants, or any other container and the eggs hatch in 7 days. These mosquito species prefer to feed on humans and they spread the dengue virus, which is spread between humans by the bite of an infected mosquito. Dengue is found yearly in northern Mexico and has caused several outbreaks in South Texas. The last outbreak in 2005 resulted in 24 confirmed cases of dengue fever and one case of den- gue hemorrhagic fever in Texas. In northern Mexico, the same outbreak led to 1,251 cases of dengue fever and 223 cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Symptoms of dengue fever include headache, rash, joint and muscle pain, high fever, and vomiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Salt Marsh Mosquito Aedes Taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Natasha Marie Agramonte and C
    EENY591 Black salt marsh mosquito Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Natasha Marie Agramonte and C. Roxanne Connelly2 Introduction The black salt marsh mosquito, Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann), is very common in the eastern coastal areas of the Americas, and is responsible for a large part of mosquito insecticide applications in Florida (Connelly and Carlson 2009, Koehler and Castner 2008). Although it is not a primary vector of major concern, it can transmit pathogens to humans and other animals. Its characteristic emergence in large numbers after rains and flooding events as well as its aggressive biting contribute to its notoriety as a pest insect. The black salt marsh mosquito is considered a nuisance in Florida. It is sheltered from large-scale mosquito control as part of the Everglades National Park conservation program to preserve their delicate ecosystem (Day et al. 2004). Figure 2. Adult female Aedes taeniorhynchus. Credits: Michelle Cutwa, University of Florida Figure 1. Bloodfeeding female Aedes taeniorhynchus. Credits: Sean McCann, University of Florida 1. This document is EENY591, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date April 2014. Reviewed December 2017. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http:// entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/. 2. Natasha Marie Agramonte, research entomologist and PhD student; and C. Roxanne Connelly, associate professor, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, UF/IFAS Extension, Vero Beach, FL 32962. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations.
    [Show full text]