DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 117/Friday, June 18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 117/Friday, June 18 34714 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices applications because of increased public Environmental Documentation • One IBCT has been established as involvement, such as the opportunity to The decision document for the the 43rd BCT at Fort Carson, CO; • The 44th BCT has been activated at comment on public notices for suspension of NWP 21 is available at the individual surface coal mining activities Fort Bliss, TX; and Corps Headquarters ‘‘National Notices in Appalachia. This additional • The 45th BCT was established at and Program Initiatives’’ page at: information could help improve not Fort Stewart, GA, as an IBCT. http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/ only the Corps analysis of potential • The Army will not stand up new Pages/nnpi.aspx and the regulations.gov individual and cumulative adverse growth IBCTs at Fort Bliss, TX; Fort Web site under docket number COE– effects of the proposed activity on the Stewart, GA; or Fort Carson, CO in 2011 2009–0032. It is also available by aquatic environment, but also on the as was originally announced in the 2007 contacting Headquarters, U.S. Army potential adverse effects on other public ROD. In place of these BCTs, the Army Corps of Engineers, Operations and interest review factors listed at 33 CFR will establish additional combat support Regulatory Community of Practice, 441 320.4(a)(1), such as conservation, units at locations across the Army to aesthetics, economics, land use, G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20314– better meet mission requirements and recreation, fish and wildlife values, 1000. man units for upcoming deployments. energy needs, and general Authority • The Army will convert a Heavy considerations of property ownership, Brigade Combat Team (HBCT) (the 1st We are suspending NWP 21 under the to the extent that those public interest Brigade of the 1st Armored Division (1⁄1 authority of Section 404(e) of the Clean factors are relevant to waters of the AD)) to a Stryker Brigade Combat Team Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section United States subject to CWA (SBCT) beginning in 2011 at Fort Bliss, jurisdiction and within the Corps 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 TX. This conversion involves the Federal control and responsibility. (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). stationing of approximately 450 Concurrent with this Federal Register Dated: June 8, 2010. additional Soldiers and their equipment notice, all Corps districts will issue Approved by: at Fort Bliss. local public notices announcing the R.L. Van Antwerp, • An HBCT will no longer be suspension of NWP 21 as of the effective Lieutenant General, U.S. Army, Commanding. returning from Germany to White Sands date identified above. [FR Doc. 2010–14778 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am] Missile Range in fiscal year 2013. The stationing of HBCTs currently assigned Grandfathering of Existing NWP 21 BILLING CODE 3720–58–P Authorizations to Germany will be reassessed in light of the Army’s global mission Today’s action prohibits District DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE requirements. Engineers from issuing NWP 21 These modifications to the original verifications in response to PCNs for Department of the Army Grow the Army decision will better surface coal mining activities in the allow the Army to respond to security Appalachian counties listed above Updated Record of Decision (ROD) for threats in an unpredictable global during the period of suspension. In Revised Army Growth and Force; security environment. other words, District Engineers cannot Structure Realignment Decisions ADDRESSES: A request for copy of the continue to process NWP 21 PCNs that ROD can be sent to the Public Affairs are pending as of June 18, 2010 or AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. Office, U.S. Army Environmental accept new or revised NWP 21 PCNs for ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA). Command, Building E4460, Attention: surface coal mining activities in the IMAE–PA, 5179 Hoadley Road, Appalachian region of those six states SUMMARY: The Department of the Army Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010– unless the suspension is lifted and NWP announces the availability of an 5401. 21 is reinstated in this region. updated ROD for Army Growth and Proponents of proposed surface coal Force Structure Realignment. This ROD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC mining activities in the Appalachian explains that the Army has modified David Patterson, Media Relations region of these six states will have to previous decisions made in December Division, Office of the Chief of Public submit applications for individual 2007 to support Army growth and force Affairs, at (703) 697–7592. permits instead of NWP 21 PCNs. structure realignment. The Army’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In January NWP 21 activities that have been decision at the time grew the Army by 2007, the President asked Congress for verified by District Engineers prior to six Infantry Brigade Combat Teams authority to increase the overall strength June 18, 2010 in the Appalachian region (IBCTs), eight active component support of the Army by 74,200 Soldiers over the of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, brigades, and associated growth in next five years. This growth was Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, smaller combat support and combat intended to mitigate shortages in units, continue to be authorized by that NWP service support units required to Soldiers, and time to train that would until it expires on March 18, 2012, complement the U.S. Army’s overall otherwise inhibit the Army from unless the District Engineer takes action force structure growth. The decision meeting readiness goals and supporting to modify, suspend or revoke a also relocated two Heavy Brigade strategic requirements. The Department particular NWP authorization on a case- Combat Teams (HBCTs) from Europe to of the Army prepared a Programmatic by-case basis in accordance with the the continental United States. This Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) procedures at 33 CFR § 330.5(d). District updated ROD details how the Army has that evaluated the potential engineers may not modify previously modified growth and realignment environmental and socioeconomic issued NWP 21 verifications to decisions to better meet operational effects associated with alternatives for authorize additional discharges of mission requirements. Specifically, the Army growth and realignment. In the dredged or fill material into waters of original decision is being modified by Final PEIS (published on October 26, the United States in the affected this updated ROD in the following 2007), the Army identified Alternative 3 Appalachian counties; such discharges ways: as the preferred alternative. Alternative must be applied for and evaluated under • Army growth is stopped at 45 active 3 (adds combat support and combat the individual permit process. component BCTs instead of 48; service support units, as well as Army VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices 34715 BCTs to the Army’s force structure) Regulatory Information Management Frequency: Semi-Annually. remains the Army’s preferred alternative Services, Office of Management, invites Affected Public: with the modification to the Army’s comments on the proposed information Not-for-profit institutions. ROD. collection requests as required by the State, Local, or Tribal Government The Final PEIS examined major Army Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. (Gov’t), State Education Associations installations within the continental DATES: Interested persons are invited to (SEAs) or Local Education United States and their ability to submit comments on or before August Associations (LEAs). support new unit stationing actions in 17, 2010. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour connection with growth and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section Burden: realignment. The Final PEIS provided 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of Responses: 138. the Army senior leader-ship with an 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires Burden Hours: 6,900. assessment of environmental and that the Office of Management and Abstract: The purpose is to socioeconomic impacts that would be Budget (OMB) provide interested implement a data collection process for associated with these actions in Federal agencies and the public an early a new semi-annual reporting for addition to the feedback and concerns of opportunity to comment on information Government Performance Results Act the public. This information was collection requests. OMB may amend or (GPRA) purposes for the National considered as part of the decision- waive the requirement for public Professional Development Program. making process for decisions contained consultation to the extent that public These data are necessary to assess the in the updated ROD (2010). participation in the approval process performance of the National The conversion of an HBCT to an would defeat the purpose of the Professional Development in meeting its SBCT at Fort Bliss, TX will create the information collection, violate State or stated goals and objectives and report to Army’s 7th active component SBCT. Federal law, or substantially interfere Department of Education’s (ED) Budget The Army’s needs are best met by with any agency’s ability to perform its Service. The National Professional transforming an HBCT at Fort Bliss as statutory obligations. The Director, Development (NPD) program provides this unit will have maximum time to Information Collection Clearance professional development activities implement conversion to an SBCT and Division, Regulatory Information intended to improve instruction for train with new equipment prior to the Management Services, Office of students with Limited English need to redeploy. In addition, Fort Bliss Management, publishes that notice proficiency (LEP) and assists education is capable of providing the SBCT with containing proposed information personnel working with such children fully modernized training and garrison collection requests prior to submission to meet high professional standards. The infrastructure; and the installation has of these requests to OMB.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Historic US–Iraq CBRNE Training Partnership
    U.S. Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear School Army Chemical Review (ACR) (ISSN (573) XXX-XXXX 0899-7047) is prepared biannually by the U.S. DSN 676-XXXX (563 prefi x) or 581-XXXX (596 prefi x) Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear School and the Maneuver Support COMMANDANT Center Directorate of Training, Fort Leonard COL(P) Leslie C. Smith 563-8053 Wood, Missouri. ACR presents professional <[email protected]> information about Chemical Corps functions related to chemical, biological, radiological, and ASSISTANT COMMANDANT nuclear (CBRN); smoke; fl ame fi eld expedients; COL Greg D. Olson 563-8054 and reconnaissance in combat support. The <[email protected]> objectives of ACR are to inform, motivate, increase CHIEF OF STAFF knowledge, improve performance, and provide a LTC Doug Straka 563-8052 forum for the exchange of ideas. This publication <[email protected]> presents professional information, but the views expressed herein are those of the authors, not the COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR Department of Defense or its elements. The content CSM Ted A. Lopez 563-8053 does not necessarily refl ect the offi cial U.S. Army <[email protected]> position and does not change or supersede any DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMANDANT–RESERVE information in other U.S. Army publications. The COMPONENT use of news items constitutes neither affi rmation COL Lawrence Meder 563-8050 of their accuracy nor product endorsement. <[email protected]> Articles may be reprinted if credit is given to ACR and its authors. All photographs are offi cial 3D CHEMICAL BRIGADE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Version Statement by Ltg Joseph Anderson
    RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LTG JOSEPH ANDERSON DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, G-3/5/7, UNITED STATES ARMY LTG AUNDRE PIGGEE DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, G-4, UNITED STATES ARMY LTG GWEN BINGHAM ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF, INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUB-COMMITTEE ON READINESS FIRST SESSION, 115TH CONGRESS READINESS MARCH 8TH, 2017 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES INTRODUCTION: Chairman Wilson, Ranking Member Bordallo, distinguished Members of the Committee, we appreciate the opportunity to testify today on the readiness of the United States Army. On behalf of our Acting Secretary, the Honorable Robert Speer, and our Chief of Staff, General Mark Milley, thank you for your support and demonstrated commitment to our Soldiers, Army Civilians, Families, and Veterans. Today, the Army remains globally engaged with over 182,000 trained and ready Soldiers committed to meeting Combatant Command deterrence and counter-terrorist requirements. These requirements fall disproportionally on the Army to fulfill: the Army meets 48% of Combatant Command base demand and is set to meet 70% of FY17 emergent force demand. This demand commits all major Regular Army combat formations that are assigned or allocated to Combatant Commands, or that are under orders to be prepared to deploy. In order to sustain this considerable level of demand, the Army has been forced to accept risk in end strength, capacity, readiness, modernization, installations, and sustainment. Simultaneously, rival nations have aggressively updated their armed forces, thus creating capability gaps that impose a significant threat to U.S. forces and contingency missions.
    [Show full text]
  • News Call Army Medic Earns Silver Star a 19-Year-Old Medic from Lake Some 500 Yards to Safety
    News Call Army Medic Earns Silver Star A 19-year-old medic from Lake some 500 yards to safety. She treated Jackson, Texas, Spc. Monica Lin them on-site before a medevac heli- Brown, 4th Squadron, 73rd Cavalry copter arrived. Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, Although Pentagon policy prohibits is the first woman in Afghanistan— women from serving in frontline and only the second female soldier combat positions, female soldiers since World War II—to earn the Silver in Afghanistan and Iraq, where the Star. In April 2007, Spc. Brown was counterinsurgencies lack real front part of a four-vehicle convoy pa- lines, participate in close-quarters trolling in eastern Afghanistan’s Pak- combat more than women did in pre- tia Province when a roadside bomb vious wars. Spc. Brown joined the struck one of the Humvees, wounding Army in November 2006 and is ex- five soldiers in her unit. She ran pected to leave Afghanistan in April. through insurgent gunfire to reach the “I did not really have time to be casualties, shielded them with her scared,” she told an Associated Press own body from mortars falling less reporter. “I was in a kind of a robot- ovided by the family than 100 yards away as she adminis- Pr mode, did not think about much but tered first aid, and helped drag them Spc. Monica Lin Brown getting the guys taken care of.” Army Trains Afghan Police. The Com- development (FDD)—to train and re- cause they are local and know the land bined Security Transition Command- form the Afghan National Police.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 100
    Calendar No. 100 111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 111–40 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATION BILL, 2010 JULY 7, 2009.—Ordered to be printed Mr. JOHNSON, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 1407] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1407) mak- ing appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. Amounts in new budget authority Total of bill as reported to the Senate for fiscal year 2010 1 ............................................................. $133,926,656,000 Total of bill as reported to the Senate for fiscal year 2011, advance appropriations ...................... 48,183,000,000 Amount of 2009 appropriations 2 ............................. 126,817,267,000 Amount of 2010 budget estimate 3 .......................... 133,487,510,000 Bill as recommended to Senate for fiscal year 2010 compared to— Amount of 2009 appropriations 2 ..................... ∂7,109,389,000 Amount of 2010 budget estimate 3 ................... ∂439,146,000 1 Includes $1,398,984,000 in overseas contingency operations funding for fiscal year 2010. 2 Includes $7,211,342,000 in emergency funding provided in Public Laws 110–329 and 111–5 and in supplemental funding provided in Public Law 111–32. 3 Includes $1,404,984,000 in overseas contingency operations funding for
    [Show full text]
  • Military Personnel Management
    Vol. 75, No. 12 March 24, 2017 Bonuses to re-enlist Army to Passing information eclipse 1M SoldiersBy David Vergun Army News Service WASHINGTON — The Army is hiring. “We’re looking for and want to retain high-quality young men and women who are resilient, fit, Soldiers of character,” said Maj. Gen. Jason T. Evans, director of Military Personnel Management. With the drawdown over, there are now “more opportunities for promotion and incentives as we grow the Army. We want Soldiers to take advantage of that,” he said. During the drawdown, if a Soldier was passed over for promotion, it usually meant separation, but now good Soldiers have a better chance of re-enlisting or extending, he said, adding there are bonuses for a number of critical military occupational specialties to sweeten the deal. On Dec. 23, the president signed the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2017 that provided funding for higher levels of manning and set into motion the end of the drawdown, Evans said. Costs to retain this size force in fiscal 2018 and beyond range between $3.5 billion and $4.5 billion, which would require additional funding later on. Prior to Dec. 23, the Army was on a path to have 460,000 active-duty Soldiers by the end of this fiscal year, with a further reduction to 450,000 by the end of fiscal 2018. Also by the end of that fiscal year the Guard would have drawn down to 335,000 and the Reserve to 195,000, said Lt. Gen. James C. McConville, Army deputy chief of staff for personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the US Army
    Atlantic Council BRENT SCOWCROFT CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY THE FUTURE OF THE ARMY TODAY, TOMORROW, AND THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW David Barno and Nora Bensahel THE FUTURE OF THE ARMY TODAY, TOMORROW, AND THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW David Barno and Nora Bensahel ISBN: 978-1-61977-465-0 Cover photo credit: Army Staff Sgt. Pedro Ortiz of the 1-501 Parachute Infantry Regiment provides security at Malamute Drop Zone, Alaska, August 2016. Department of Defense. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. September 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 1. The Army’s World in 2016 4 2. The Army Today: 2016-2020 10 3. The Army of Tomorrow: 2020-2025 24 4. The Army of the Day after Tomorrow: 2025-2040+ 34 About the Authors 45 Appendix: Summary of Recommendations 46 THE FUTURE OF THE ARMY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Army today is at a strategic crossroads. and the day after tomorrow (2025-2040 and beyond). After fifteen years of intense warfare in Iraq and In practice, though, there are no clear divisions among Afghanistan, it is managing the same type of budget these time periods, and they will inevitably overlap. and manpower reductions that occurred after World However, the Army must start preparing now for War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the end all of these time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Construction and Veterans Af- Fairs, and Related Agencies Appropria- Tions for Fiscal Year 2010
    S. HRG. 111–124 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AF- FAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIA- TIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 3082/S. 1407 MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, THE DE- PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Department of Veterans Affairs Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 48–311 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BEN NELSON, Nebraska MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JON TESTER, Montana ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania CHARLES J.
    [Show full text]
  • (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates Military Construction Family Housing
    Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates Military Construction Family Housing Defense-Wide Justification Data Submitted to Congress February 2010 FY 2011 Budget Estimates Military Construction, Defense-Wide Table of Contents Page No. STATE LIST ii BUDGET APPENDIX ix SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS x AGENCY/ACTIVITY SUMMARY xii AGENCIES – INSIDE AND OUTSIDE U.S. Defense Information Systems Agency 1 Defense Intelligence Agency 6 Defense Logistics Agency 10 DoD Dependents Education Activity 50 Missile Defense Agency 90 National Security Agency 93 TRICARE Management Activity 111 U.S. Special Operations Command 176 Washington Headquarters Service 246 ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM 257 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION HEADQUARTERS 259 CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 261 MINOR CONSTRUCTION 263 PLANNING AND DESIGN 265 FYDP 267 FY 2011 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS REQUEST 279 i FY 2011 Military Construction, Defense-Wide ($ in Thousands) New/ Authorization Approp. Current Page State/Installation/Project Request Request Mission No. Arizona Special Operations Command Yuma SOF Military Free Fall Simulator 8,977 8,977 C 179 California Defense Logistics Agency Point Loma Annex Replace Storgae Facility Increment 3 - 20,000 C 13 Point Mugu Aircraft Direct Fueling Station 3,100 3,100 C 17 Colorado Special Operations Command Fort Carson SOF Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar 3,717 3,717 C 183 District of Columbia Defense Intelligence Agency Bolling Air Force Base Replace Parking Structure Phase 1 3,000 3,000 C 7 Florida Special
    [Show full text]
  • Planning an Army for the 21St Century Principles to Guide U.S
    November 2018 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE JOSHUA KLIMAS AND GIAN GENTILE Planning an Army for the 21st Century Principles to Guide U.S. Army Force Size, Mix, and Component Distribution oday’s U.S. Army comprises the Regular Army and two reserve components (RCs): the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and the TU.S. Army Reserve (USAR).1 As recent operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere have shown, the Army employs forces and capabilities from all three components to fulfill operational demands. Recent operations have also high- lighted the unique attributes of the Army forces in each component. For example, the Army relied heavily on Regular Army forces—combat forces in particular—for initial major combat operations (MCOs) and employed reserve-component (RC) forces more extensively in subsequent force rotations. The forces in the Army’s three components contribute in different ways because they have different attributes. For example, Regular Army soldiers serve on a full-time basis, while most RC soldiers serve on a part-time basis.2 This impacts the relative costs of Regular Army and RC units, as well as the time and opportu- nities available for training. On the one hand, the annual operations and support costs for a nonmobilized RC unit operating on a part-time basis are less than for a C O R P O R A T I O N comparable Regular Army unit operating on a full-time From the Colonial Era to the basis. On the other hand, the part-time status for most Present, the United States Has RC soldiers means that RC units train less—and so are Repeatedly Adapted the Principles typically less ready in peacetime—compared with their Guiding Army Force Size, Mix, Regular Army counterparts, who typically have much greater time and opportunities to train each year.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Army's Modular Force Structure
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instru- ments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports un- dergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • EACH Welcomes New Commander by Roger G
    Vol. 67 No. 22 June 5, 2009 Word of the month: Courage EACH welcomes new commander by Roger G. Meyer Evans Army Community Hospital Public Affairs Col. Jimmie O. Keenan assumed command of Evans Army Community Hospital and the Medical Activity from Col. Kelly A. Wolgast at a ceremony at the hospital May 28. Keenan said, “We are excited to join your team … I am honored and humbled to serve the Soldiers, Families and civilians at Fort Carson. I look forward to the new friendships, partnerships and to meeting the challenges that we will face. Together we can accomplish anything and everything for our Soldiers and their Families.” Keenan comes to Fort Carson after most recently serving as chief of staff of the U.S. Army Warrior Transition Command in Arlington, Va. An Army nurse, she has served in numerous chief and head nurse positions and, while at Fort Belvoir, Va., as Dewitt Army Community Hospital’s deputy commander for Nursing. Other assign- ments include Army congressional fellow for Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, chief of the Congressional Liaison Office, Office of the Army Surgeon General and garrison commander of Camp Bullis, Texas. Keenan holds masters’ degrees in nursing administration and strategic studies. Wolgast served as the hospital’s commander since June 2007. She was instrumental in establishing Fort Carson’s Warrior Transition Battalion and orchestrated the Medical Activity’s postwide capital improvements. Under her command, Fort Carson gained a renovated labor and delivery “Mother/Baby” unit, LASIK eye-surgery suite, operating rooms and saw the groundbreaking for the $6l million, 153,000 square-foot Soldier Family Care Clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding America's Military Project
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 215 | AUGUST 22, 2019 Rebuilding America’s Military Project: The United States Army Thomas W. Spoehr Rebuilding America’s Military Project: The United States Army Thomas W. Spoehr SPECIAL REPORT No. 215 | AUGUST 22, 2019 DAVIS INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY II REBUILDING AMERICA’S MILITARY PROJECT: THE UNITED STATES ARMY About the Author Thomas W. Spoehr is Director of the Center for National Defense, of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, at The Heritage Foundation. The author would like to recognize Dr. David Johnson and Major General Bill Hix, U.S. Army (retired), for their review and comment on drafts of this report. Any errors or opinions in this paper are solely those of the author. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/sr215 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. SPECIAL REPORT | No. 215 AUGUST 22, 2019 | 1 heritage.org Rebuilding America’s Military Project: The United States Army Thomas W. Spoehr he Army is making a concerted effort to change in order to meet the future. Efforts such as the creation of Army Futures Command and TCross Functional Teams are clear examples of the Army’s commitment to change. Such efforts must be sustained over multiple tenures. The Army must remain flexible enough to deal with unforeseen challenges, including preserving hard-learned counterinsurgency capabilities.
    [Show full text]