132 COMMODITY GOTHICISM COMMODITY GOTHICI would-be consumers Jacobs, W. & Jones, G. (1985) The Comic Book and bodily corruption, as wonderful than ‘table-turning’ ever was,” is also example of such invocations. Hen Heroes. New York: Crown. of the products of slavery find themselves thoroughly uncanny (Marx 1992: 31). And directly eicts commodities’ refu McCue, G. S. & Bloom, C. (1993) DarkKnights: The consuming enslaved bodies instead. Such indeed, as “critics as diverse as Jacques Derrida, “mirror” one another, by depictir New Comics in Context. London: Pluto Press. visions may well attain their most crystallized Chris Baldick, and Terry Eagleton,” point out figure who stands frozen, half-turn Pearson, R. E. & Uricchio, W. teds.) (1991) The form within what Timothy Morton has since this turn to the Gothic seems “central” to modiste’s glass. What stands refle York: Routledge. Many Lives of the Batman. New termed the “blood sugar’ topos” (Morton Marx’s thinking as a whole (Smith 2005: 39). mirror before her is not just her identity: The super- Round, 1. (2005) fragmented 2000: 172—3): that is, the Gothic scenario Where Marx’s fetishized table merely “stands rately dressed form; it is the emaci hero condition. International Journal ofComic Art whereby slave-produced sugar, once stirred on its head” (Marx 1992: 31), however, objects of the needlewoman who seems tc 7(2), 358—69. into a cup of tea, transforms itself (back) into in the commodity Gothic mode turn on their while laboring over the ball-go Sabin, R. (1996) Comics, Comix and Graphic Novels. all-too literal embodiment of its own consumers. In this, they London: Phaidon. a bloody, take the already would-be consumer has just put c brutal histories of origin. uncanny process of commodity fetishization 2003: 150, Wafldey 1981: 36—54). If Marx’s 1867 account of “the fetishism of one step further, in part by taking it a half step Punch cartoon of 1848, the pattern Commodities and the Secret Thereof’ (Marx back. What if objects, while retaining the tran smock, depicted in close-up, reveal. 1992: 31) postdates visions of “blood sugar,” scendent claims of commodities, attempted to eningly low going rate for ten hot Commodity Gothicism however, that work remains indispensible to resist, and perhaps avenge, their subjection interspersed with images of del understanding such visions’ force, not least as to abstraction, by laying bare the now-hidden, (Lootens 2003: 151; Walldey 1981: TRICIA LOOTENS key points of origin for the “post-Romantic “grotesque idea” of their own now-occluded these half-reversals are, moreove] Gothic imagination” (Smith 2005: 39). for in material, even corporeal origins? This is the draw power from earlier work. I In its most intense forms, the commodity Marx’s terms, even before blood sugar enters fear that creates blood sugar; and it is a fear child’s smock cartoon is named Gothic represents a sinister variant on what the teacup in the scenario above, that sugar that animates commodity Gothicism through the greatest of all object-heirs to b Elaine freedgood has influentially termed the has already undergone transformation into a out the nineteenth century and beyond. the subject, that is, of Thomas Hc “ideas in things.” As Freedgood conceives them, commodity. Like its counterpart, that now- With its Crystal Palace, department stores, successful “Song of the Shirt.” Ir those material objects that fill Victorian novels legendary “plain, homely, bodily form” of a and explosive development of advertising, ballad, the fabric of clothing comes are frightening enough in their own right: for table to which Marx’s account of fetishism so mid-Victorianism stakes clear and immediate its wearer, as if he were suddenly famously turns (Marx 1992: 13), such sugar has claims as a highpoint ofthe commodity Gothic. dying sweated laborers’ skin: “It i stockpiled in these things the knowledge that is undergone a process of abstraction. for by ren Certainly authors of the realist novel, and you’re wearing out, I But humar on the grisly specifics of conflicts and bears dering objects commodities — by replacing Dickens in particular, have provided particu lives!” (Hood 1970: 305). conquests that a culture can neither regularly their use value with exchange value — we put larly rich resources for investigations, both of Intensely Victorian though the acknowledge nor permanently destroy if it is out of sight both “the useful character of the the commodity Gothic and commodity fetish Gothic may be, however, many going to be able to count on its own history to in of labour embodied in them, and ism in general know itself and realize a future. (freedgood various kinds (see freedgood 2006, especially survives, like so much else that is of that labour” (Marx 1992: 138—58, 2006: 2) the concrete forms and Smith 2005). Still, the invocation well beyond the end of the nineteen 5). Now reduced to the status of a “mirror” of of commodities’ uncanny, often vengeful half- When, for example, Walter Benj am (Marx 1992: 24), the sugar has reversals As the commodity Gothic perceives them, abstract value of fetishization accepts no generic that the: “bourgeois interior of the a commodity. Still, however, such objects go one step further. Not lost something by becoming limits (Lootens 2003); and boundary crossings sixties to the nineties, with its gigar object’s perspective, content with containing ideas, they develop, or in another sense (from an may be particularly important here. Consider, overrun by carving, its sunless cor taken on new power. for threaten to develop, ideas of their own; and one might say), it has also example, the mid-century trope of the the palm tree stands [...J provide table, blood sugar, these ideas tend toward the possibility of For like Marx’s legendary genteel woman adorning herself in poisoned housing only for corpses,” his ass become “something wreaking historical vengeance at once through once commodified, has finery. Wfflcie Collins’ moonstone, in the novel “the bourgeois living space [...] ti (Marx 1992: 31). It has assumed of that and against the process of commodification transcendent” name; the maddening diamond neck nameless murder” (Benjamin 19 “the whole world of com lace itself. “a social relation” to of George Eliot’s (1876) Daniel Deronda transLation) looks beyond Dickens the ranks of those (Eliot As Charlotte Sussman’s Consuming Anxiet modities”; it has joined 1995: 358—9): these haunted, haunting criticism of John Ruskin, who read can appear as “inde objects ies dramatically demonstrates, the commodity human productions that and others like them may wield an surfaces of late-Victorian furniture with life,” even Gothic clearly predates the work of Marx pendent beings endowed impact whose force resonates, in part, through they had been by the effort “to bai “producers instead of (Sussman 2000: 110—29). Within the early anti seeming to “rule” their juxtaposition with even more explicit invoca fection” through mechanical i 1992: 24, 32, 35). slavery writing that Sussman studies, com being ruled by them” (Marx tions of commodities as things with vengeful as material accusations revealing a Marx’s suggestion modity Gothic fantasies repeatedly give shape Comic though it may be, ideas of their own (see VICTORIAN GOTHIC). aesthetics whose values acted t commodified, “evolves out Punch’s to powerful rhetorical invocations of the con that a table, once 1863 cartoon “The Haunted Lady, or expression, to check exertion, to pai ideas, far more fluence of commodification with cannibalism of its wooden brain grotesque ‘The Ghost’ in the Looking-Glass” offers one ity” (Ruskin 1904: 204). At the
‘The
in the Ghost’
one ity” offers 204). At 1904: (Ruskin
the
same time,
ookingGlas5” more far
ideas,
grotesque
brain
wooden 1863
its Punch’s or cartoon “The Lady, of
to Haunted check
expressiofl to
vital exertion, paralyze
out cannibalism
with
“evolves
modification
commodified,
once
table,
a
of ideas
own their
(see that to acted values whose
aesthetics GOTHIC).
VICTORIAN
con- “destroy the
of
suggestion
Marx’s invocations
be,
torical may
it
though
of tions Comic as
with things as vengeful
commodities a
material
revealing accusations shape
corrupting give 35). 32,
24,
repeatedly
1992:
fantasies
(Marx
them”
by
ruled
with
even more being
invoca explicit juxtaposition fection”
through
mechanical corn- produCtion of
studies,
instead
Sussman
“producers
that
their
“rule”
to
impact in force
whose part, seeming resonates, by they
had through
been the effort
“to
banish imper anti-
even early
the
life,”
Within
with
110—29).
endowed
beings
and objects
like them others
may pendent an
of wield
surfaces
as shaped furniture, late_Victorian
Marx
of
“inde
as
work
the
appear
can
predates
that
productions
(Eliot
1995:
these human
358—9):
of haunted,
criticism the John who haunting Ruskin,
read smooth
those commodity
of
the
ranks
the
y demonstrates,
joined
has
it
lace
of Eliot’s
George modities”; (1876) Daniel
to Deronda looks Dickens beyond translation) the
social
Anxiet com
of
Consuming world
whole
Sussman’s “the
:e to
relation”
of the that
name; social “a neck
diamond
nameless 89, my murder” maddening
1972: (Benjamin
assumed
has
It
31).
1992:
(Marx
[..i finery. in Collins’
the Wilkie transcendent” novel
“the moonstone, living
bourgeois
for space
trembles
“something
commodification
of
become
process
has
he
commodified,
genteel
in woman once
herself
for only adorning housing poisoned
his corpses”
that assertion
through
sugar,
once at
blood
table,
vengeance
)rical
legendary
Marx’s
[...) for like the of
For example, trope the the
mid-centurY tree palm
stands of
provides adequate
power. possibility
new the
on
taken toward
also
has :end
it
say),
may might be
here. one
by important its Consider,
overrun carving, sunless particularly
corners and
where
own;
their perspective,
of
ideas
object’s
an
evelop,
(from
sense
limits another
2003); and
in (Lootens to crossings the sixties
its with nineties, or boundary
buffets, gigantic
Still, develop, they
ideas,
commodity. a
containing
becoming
by
something
of reversals lost
no accepts the: that
generic fetishizatioll of
the
Not interior “bourgeois
[eighteen-I
has further.
sugar
step
the one
24), go
1992:
objects
h (Marx
value
of
uncanny, abstract
often commodities’ half- vengeful for
When,
example,
Walter them, Benjamin proposes
of
perceives “mirror”
a
of
Gothic
status
the
modity to
reduced
Now 138—58, and 2005).
5). Still, Smith the well invocation
the the end of beyond
century. nineteenth
1992:
(Marx
labour”
that of
forms
ism
concrete in
(see the general 2006,
especially so like Freedgood survives,
is else much that
Victorian,
and
them,
in
embodied
labour
of
kinds
the
various and
Gothic commodity
fetish
may be, Gothic commodity in many it
however, (freedgood respects
the of
future.
a
character realize
and useful f
“the
both
sight
larly
of
to
rich
for out
resources of both history
investigations, Intensely the
though Victorian own
its commoditY put
on
we count
to
value
— able
e
exchange
with
value is
use if it in Dickens their
have
particUlar provided destroy
lives!” particu 305).
(Hood 1970:
permanently
replacing nor
by
ge
—
commodities
objects regularly
Certainly
of neither dering the
realist authors I novel, and
can
you’re
out, wearing But
human creatures’
culture
ren a by
that
for
abstraction.
of
and
process
a
conflicts
of
claims a as of
undergone the highpoiflt
dying
Gothic. specifics
is skin: sweated laborers’ not
“It commodity linen
grisly
has
the sugar
such
13),
1992:
things
(Marx
these
in
turns
stockpiled famously and is stakes
clear its if as he that IdVictoriani5m immediate wearer, were in suddenly
encased ledge
so
fetishism of
account
Marx’s
which
to
and
table of explosive of the ballad, development
fabric to
hang clothing on comes advertising, a
of
form”
bodily
for
right: homely,
own
“plain,
their
in
its With
legendary enough Crystal
stores, Palace,
ing of the “Song department
successful Shirt.” this In 1843
now-
that
novels counterpart,
its
Like
Victorian
fill
that
out
the commodity.
century
objects and the nineteenth is, beyond. that of subject, rial Hood’s Thomas a wildly
into
transformation them,
conceives undergone
already that
freedgood has
As animates commoditY all GothiCism
the of through to ings.”
greatest
blood sugar:
object-heirs
sugar
that
above,
the
scenario
termed
the
in
influentially teacup fear
has that
the a is it and blood creates sugar; fear
is child’s dgood
cartoon smock for of named one
enters
sugar
blood
what
on
before
even
variant
terms,
sinister
a material, Marx’s
even is
the corporeal origins?
This from draw ‘resents
power the earlier work. Indeed, in
For
39).
2005:
(Smith
commodity
the
imagination”
forms,
Gothic
of idea” own their intense
“grotesque these are, nowocclUded too they half_reversals St
moreover,
“post-Romantic
the
for
origin
of
points
to
by key laying
the bare abstraction,
151; 2003: 67). now-hidde1, (Lootens 1981: as Raw Waildey
as
least
not
force,
visions’
such
resist,
and understanding their avenge perhaps
with subjection of images interspersed death’s )TENS
heads to
indispensible
remains
work
that
however, scendent of
claims to
eningly low comm0dite5, going attempted for rate ten
hours’ sewing,
Gothicism
sugar,”
“blood
of
iodity
visions
postdates
31)
back. 1992:
if What
while objects the tran
in smock, retaining depicted reveals the close-up,
fright
(Marx
Thereof’
Secret
the
and
one
Commodities step by in a it part taking further, step half of Punch
the cartoon
a 1848, of child’s pattern of
fetishism
“the
of
account
1867
Marx’s
If of uncanny process 150, 2003: commoditY
a 36—54). 1981:
In fetishiZation Waildey related
origin.
of
histories
brutal In this, consumers.
they
the take
already has just on would-be
put consumer (Lootens own
its
of
embodiment
literal
all-too
in
the bloody,
a comm0dY on Gothic turn
mode
their while
the over that the laboring ball-gown
into
(back)
itself
Phaidon.
transforms
tea,
of
cup
a
on its into head”
Novels.
31), 1992: (Marx
of the however, objects
who Graphic to seems died have needlewoman
and
stirred Comix once Comics,
sugar,
1996)
slave-produced
Where whereby Marx’s
table
merely rately “stands fetishized it is form; the dressed
corpse emaciated
scenario
8—69. Gothic
the
is,
that
Art
172—3):
Comic
of
Marx’s 2000:
a as
whole Journal 39). (Smith 2005: thinking is her mirror
before her just not own elabo
International
(Morton
ndition.
topos”
sugar’
super
The
the
this cblood identity: turn termed to
the seems
Gothic
to
glass. “central” modiste’s stands What in I
the fragmented
reflected
since
(2005) has
Morton
Timothy
Routledge. what
York:
within
New
Chris form
and Botman. Baldick, Terry
out Eagleton”
who point the
stands frozen, figure a of toward
halfturfled .ives
crystallized
most
The
their
(1991)
attain
(eds.) well
may
W.
as indeed, visions Uricchio,
as as diverse “critics &
I. by one Derrida, Jacques a
“mirror” R. another,
female Such depicting
instead.
Press.
bodies
Pluto
enslaved London:
Context.
in consuming uncanny thorougllY 31).
omics 1992: (Marx
And
directly enacts
to refusal fully
commodities’
themselves
The
find
Knights:
slavery
Dark
of
(1993)
C.
products Bloom,
&
the S.
3. of
wonderful
than is was,”
of ever also such
example the Here, artist invocatiofl5. ‘able-tUrnirg’
consumers
would-be
as
Crown.
corruption, York:
New bodily and
Book
Comic The
(1985)
G. Jones, &
vV.
133 COMMODITY GOTHIC1SM
GOTHICISM COMMODITY 134 COMMODITY GOTHICISM CONTEMPORARY GO’] though, Benjamin’s point also speaks to the the terrors of the commodity Gothic tend to Waildey, C. (1981) The Ghost in the Looking Glass: “butcher and his fiend-like que later writer’s own fascination with modernity’s turn toward the ends of social reform: invoca The Victorian Seamstress. London: Peter Owen. Scene 11, 35), and their presenc relations to the collector. tions of horror, here, most often signal com embodies the slaughter of innoc mitment to hope (see JACKSON, SHIRLEY). Indeed, as far as students of the Gothic FURTHER READING to haunt. Just as they refuse to “j are concerned, Victorian commodity Gothic the opening scene, so does child’ visions may live, at once sharpened, diffused, SEE ALSO: Jackson, Shirley; Victorian Gothic. Abbas, A. (198$) Walter Benjamin’s collector: The an important part of the theatri fate of modern experience. and reversed, in the bitter vision of a work like New Literary History Dolls frequently accompany the 20, 217—37. Shirley Jackson’s 1948 The Road through the and, in order to embody Banqu Bowen, J. (2000) Other Dickens: Pickwick to Chuzzle Wall. Here, on comfortable suburban Pepper REFERENCES kings, myriad toy wit. Oxford: Oxford University Press. puppets desce Desmond and other “descendents rafters. Far more chilling Street, a Mr. Benjamin, W. (1972) Hochherrschaftlich Moblierte Houston, G. T. (2005) from Dickens to Dracula: to a of farmers” are “accustomed to thinking of Zehnzimmerwohnung [Manorially furnished Gothic, Economics, and Victorian Fiction. Cam century audience, as the child; themselves as owners”; and the objects they ten-room apartmentJ. In Einbahnstrasse. Walter bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Macbeth they keen in a nursery own allow them to do so. True: Benjamin: Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. IV, I [One- Richards, T. (1990) The Commodity Culture of Vic “Macbe-eth!” “Macbe-eth!” way street. Walter Benjamin: Collected works] torian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851— In an age in which we no bill even the very chair on which Mr. Desmond sat (ed. R. Tiedemann & H. Schweppenhaeuser). 1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. witches (see WITCHCRAFT) or spir suffer Tubingen: Suhrkamp Verlag, 83—148. Wagner, I. S. & Hassan, N. (eds.) (2007) Consuming in the evenings belonged to him only on pp. the divine right of kings — neither ance; it had belonged first to someone who made Collins, W. (1991 [1868]) The Moonstone (ed. Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century. Lanham, sorcery can be relied on to prov MD: it, in turn governed by someone who planned it, A. Trodd). New York: Oxford University Press. Lexington. factor” for a contemporary audie although he not known Eliot, G. (1995 [1876]) Daniel Deronda (ed. T. Cave). and Mr. Desmond, had child and adult spectators alike s it, had chosen it because it had been presented New York: Penguin. a confrontation with three terrify to him as completely choosable (Jackson 1969: Freedgood, E. (2006) The Ideas in Things: Fugitive three dead-alive children proved 128—9). Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago, IL: Uni versity of Chicago Press. match for them in the uncanny “st Contemporary Gothic over, though the production sp True, too, that it is “on the same principle” that Hood, T. (1970 [1843]) The song of the shirt. In Thomas Hood (ed. Clubbe). LUCIE ARMITT opinions (Michael Billington of 1 Mr. Desmond has “a house,” that he has “a Selected Poems of J. j Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, and Susannah Clapp being amor street in front of his house.” Still, none of these 304—7. Summer 2011 saw the launch of the Royal tors; see Billington 2011; Clapp 2( objects are telling. And thus, Mr. Desmond pp. Jackson, S. (1969 [1946]) The Road Through the Shakespeare Company’s new production of Spencer (2011) in The Telegrap) continues to live “on the patience of all the Wall. New York: McFadden-Bartell. Macbeth (dir. Michael Boyd), with Jonathan how the changes in production people who did not kill him.” Eating “the foods Lootens, T. (2003) Fear of furniture: Commodity Slinger in the title role. Macbeth is, of course, a play’s original sense of superstitic they are allowed to buy” and sleeping “at night Gothicism teaching of Victorian litera and the play around which superstition and the sinister between sheets made by hands they would ture. In D. L. Hoeveler & T. Heller (eds.), Gothic accrue like no other, and in this respect Boyd’s never shake,” he and his neighbors remain, fiction: The British and American Traditions. New There were many moments whet production is controversial, abandoning what apparently unthinkingly, subject to York: Modern Language Association of America, my palms were clammy and my he is arguably its most Gothic ingredient: the And when I emerged into pp. 148—58. the fr three witches on the heath who greet Macbeth interval and heard the bells of unseen governors: the prices in a distant town, Marx, K. ([1867] 1992) Marx’s Capital: A Student in Act I Scene 3 and whom for Church ringing, it felt like a blesse regulated by minds and hungers in a town even Edition (ed. C. J. Arthur). London: Lawrence and to he returns evil. But then it was back to the h farther away, all the possessions which depended Wishart. evil counsel in Act IV Scene 1. In Boyd’s pro heart of darkness. on someone in another place, someone who con Morton, T. (2000) The Poetics of Spice: Romantic duction these bags, and their culinary experi trolled words and paper and ink, who could by Consumerism and the Exotic. Cambridge, UK: ments with “Eye of newt and toe of frog, I Wool the changing of a word on paper influence the Cambridge University Press. of bat and tongue of dog” (Act IV, Scene 1, It is this preponderant fascinati period. The very texture of the ground. Ruskin, J. (1904) Second, or Gothic, 14—15), disappear and are replaced by fearful haunted or haunting child that A nature of Gothic. In Complete Works. Vol. 10: The apparitions of more familiar proportions. So fies, in Twentieth-Century Gothic Stones of Venice (ed. E. T. Cook & A. Wedder With “nothing to say about how soon their the play opens with three children’s corpses key characteristic setting apart th burn). London: George Allen, pp. 180—2 15. rot, when the sheets being lowered from the fly loft on rary houses” “begin to Smith, A. (2005) Dickens’ ghosts: Invisible econo wires. As Gothic from its antecedents. I might tear” (Jackson 1969: 128—9), Mr. mies and Christmas. Victorian Review 31(2), they descend they start to kick and it is only tion that began with Henry James Desmond and his Pepper Street neighbors will 36—55. then that the audience recognizes them to the Screw in 1898 (see JAMES, H] not have much to say, either, when their chil Sussman, C. (2000) Consuming Anxieties: Consumer be “undead” children, lowered like the half- which, with its unspoken/unspea dren begin dying. In this, they might serve to Protest, Gender, and British Slavery, 1713—1833. lynched. These are Macduff’s “pretty ones” and the indeterminate language c remind us, by reverse example, that in the end, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Act IV, Scene 3, 217), slaughtered by the guilt that consumes Miles and Fl 174 DEGENERATION DEGENERATI( gothic novel, Klosterheim: 01; The Masque in 1827 and which he returned to and refined Nordau and Lombroso would so classify’ him” It is thus not accidental that subse (1832), which is a wonderful metaphysical in 1839 and 1854. This was a return to the (Stoker 1996: 342) (see STOKER, BRAM). Her modelings of degeneration took muddle of intense dream sequences, Radclif sensational aspects ofthe Westniorland Gazette, conclusion is based upon a description that similar contexts of political upheav fian device, and thinly disguised autobiograph which reported murder trials alongside the Jonathan Harker had earlier made in his Italy in the l870s (Lombroso) and ical detail — Landgrave, the villain, for example, general news. Presented as a connoisseur’s journal of the Count’s physiognomical attri siècle Britain (Nordau). tortures students with a set of “tyrannical regu lecture, De Quincey gleefully analyzes various butes. Harker’s description, as Leonard Wolf Lombroso’s work on criminality lations” from the author’s own experience of horrible murders in the same way that Burke has noted, is a paraphrase of Cesare Lombro upon a notion of atavism in order I the Manchester Free Grammar School. De had considered the Sublime and Aristotelian so’s description of the archetypal criminal h the degenerate, delinquent type (1 Quincey was out of his comfort zone with an tragedy, the gallows humor and sustained irony his Criminal Man (1876) (Wolf 1975: 300). The 126), who needed to be isolated fro extended narrative, however, and tried to have masking a genuine interest in the violent and link signifies the Count’s inherent degenera of society. As in Morel, the und it excised from his collected works. De Quinc macabre that is present in his letters and jour tion as it marks out his innate criminality. was that various social issues such w ey’s relationship with the Gothic discourse was, nalism. Dark humor, horror, and suspense can Mina’s reference to Max Nordau, whose Degen tion, for example, should be seen i: however, rarely so literal. As R. L. Snyder notes, also be found in “The English Mail-Coach” eration was first published in 1892 (carrying terms, and Lombroso went to great De Quincey’s stylistic attraction to the Gothic stories, published in Blackwood’s in 1849. a dedication to Lombroso), compounds the photograph the faces of criminals (at mode is best explained through his sensitivity In Albert Zugsmith’s 1962 film version of Count’s degeneracy by aligning him with an faces such as ears) in order to develo1 to the delicate balance between illusion and the Confessions, Vincent Price played “Gilbert amoral foppishness (the Count as dissolute ite images of particular types of reality (1981: 130). This metaphysical insight is De Quincey,” a descendant of Thomas who aristocrat) that Nordau regarded as a troubling propensity. most realized in the surreal self-exploration rescues slave girls from the San Francisco Tong characteristic of the fin de siècle (see FIN-DE Both Morel and Lombroso saw d of his autobiographical writing, which De Wars with a wisecracking dwarf. SIÈCLE GOTHIC). Theories of degeneracy thus as potentially lurking within certah
Quincey described as “impassioned prose” shape Stoker’s novel in particular, but they also physiology — an idea that would (1889: Works: I, 14). The Confessions follow SEE ALSO: Romanticism; Tales of Terror; provide a more general context that underpins culminate in a movement for euger both the evangelical and Enlightenment forms Urban Gothic. the fin-de-siècle Gothic’s engagement with tion. However, Nordau transposed t of revelatory narrative, while anticipating New disease, the body, race, and decadence. In order symptomology from a medical or and Gonzo Journalism. Although the pariah to appreciate this it is important to consider context to an artistic one in order t REFERENCES status of the author is implicit, these are not how theories of degeneration elaborated a lan for what he, and other reactionar sordid depictions of addiction but meditations De Quincey, T. (1889) The Collected Writings of guage of “otherness” that the Gothic could commentators, regarded as troublit on imagination and psychology, with the Thomas Dc Quincey (ed. D. Masson), 14 vols. conceptually import within the form’s ideo siècle forms of art. Nordau grouped a author’s self-awareness, memory, and creativ Edinburgh: A&C Black. logical construction of the abnormal. range of writers including Ibsen, A ity explored through the analysis of the opium Snyder, R. L. (1981) Klosterheinl: De Quincey’s The roots of a theory of degeneration are to Zola in order to account for what ki Gothic Masque. Research Studies 49, 129—42. dream. Hypnogogic and hallucinatory pas be found in the work of Bénèdict Augustin failure of moral vision in the focus sages are epic, sublime, and terrible, and exter Morel, who published widely on the topic in of social and economic conflict (l nal urban spaces always dark and labyrinthine FURTHER READING the 1840s and 1850s in France. He was famous celebration of symbolic forms (Ibse for his work — De Quincey’s London is a lot closer to the on “Cretinism” and he attempted dangerous art for art’s sake attitud Bridgewater, P. (2004) Dc Quincey and the Gothic rookeries of Reynolds, Dickens, Poe, Baude to map a theory of heredity that included social While Nordau’s Degeneration was a Masquerade. New York: Rodopi. diseases and ethical issues such as alcoholism received critique of laire, and Stevenson than that of his contem Hayter, A. (1968) Opium and the Romantic Imagina the fin de sièc and poraries. In Gothic terms, it is the psychological tion. London: Faber & Faber. supposed sexual impropriety. Morel thus not without its detractors (includiti sought dissonance of the addict and the deep narcosis Lindop, G. (1981) The Opium-Eater: A Life of to develop a theory of human behavior James and George Bernard Shaw). described in “The Pains ofOpium” that provide Thomas Dc Qllincey. London: J. hi. Dent. that medicalized culturally illicit practices and book’s reliance on an implicit dis the most influential material, as well as the Morrison, R. (2001) Poe’s Dc Quincey, Poe’s Dupin. saw their reproduction in biological terms. atavism (inherited from Lombroso) symbolic experimentation of the author in Essays in Criticism 51(4), 424—41. Daniel Pick has noted that Morel’s exploration vides a context for a certain strand search of a language of dreams. Much of the I of degeneration in France should be seen fin-de-siècle Gothic. psychological urban Gothic of the later nine within the political context of, and social As critics such as David Punter (1 dilemmas teenth century would have been unthinkable Degeneration inaugurated by, the foundation of noted, the fin-dc-siècle Gothic en without De Quincey (see URBAN GOTHIC). France’s Second Empire in 1848 (1989: 54). troubling fear that humanity may re After the Confessions, De Quincey is prob ANDREW SMITH Morel’s account of the hereditary degenerate a state of animalistic barbarism. ably most remembered for his Swiftian treatise was thus part of a national soul-searching that means that one cannot (as in Nordau “On Murder Considered as One of the Fine In Dracula (1897), Min.a Harker declares that sought to pathologize behaviors and traits much confidence in the prevailing Arts,” which he wrote initially for Blackwood’s “The Count is a criminal and of criminal type. that could threaten the health of the nation. civilization because they may conta
type.
that
the could
of the threaten criminal
health nation. of and civilization
they may because
contain within
criminal a
is
Count “The
Blackwood’s
for
initially
wrote
he
that
to
sought declares
behaviors traits and pathologize J-Iarker
much in
the confidence of prevailing models Mina
(1897),
Dracula In
fine
the
of
One
as
Considered
was a of thus part national
that means
that soul-searching one in
cannot (as Nordau) have too
treatise
Swiftian
his for
membered
Morel’s of the account a
hereditary of state
degenerate
animalistic
This also barbarism.
SMITH
ANDREW
prob
is
Quincey
De
Confessions,
France’s Second in 1848 Empire 54). (1989: fear troubling that may humanity into relapse
GOTHIC). Degeneration URBAN
(see
Quincey
by, dilemmas the
of inaugurated the foundation noted, a fin-dc-siècle Gothic entertains
unthinkable
been
have
would
iry
within the
of, political context and
social As critics as such David
Punter (1996) have
nine
later
the
of Gothic
urban
sl
of in
France degeneration be should seen
Gothic. fin-de-siëcle
the
of
Much
dreams. of
language
Daniel has
that Pick
noted
Morel’s a vides a exploration for context
certain
strand of
British 424—41.
51(4),
Criticism in
Essays in
author
the
of
cperimentafion
saw
their Dupin.
in biological reproduction Poe’s terms.
atavism from
(inherited
that Quincey, De pro
Lombroso) Poe’s
(2001) R.
Morrison,
the
as
well
as
material,
iftuential
I.
Dent. that
M.
culturally medicalized illicit and practices book’s
an on London: reliance
of implicit discourse Quincey.
Dc
Thomas
provide
that
Opium” of
Pains
of L11 “The
A
Opium-Eater:
to sought The theory a
of develop human
behavior (1981) James and
George G. is Bernard the It Shaw).
Lindop,
narcosis
deep
the
and
addict
the
of
Faber. & and Faber sexual
supposed thus
impropriety. not Morel
its London:
without detractors tion. (including William
psychological
the
is it
terms,
RomanticImngina
Gothic the
and
Opium
(1968) A. diseases
as and such ethical
issues Hayter,
alcoholism of fin the critique received de siècle, it was
contem
his
of
that
than
Rodopi.
tevenson York:
New
to Masquerade. map a of
theory
that heredity
included social
Nordau’s While a was Degeneration popularly
Gothic
Baude
the
and
Poe,
Quincey Dickens,
Dc
(2004)
P. Reynolds,
f
Bridgewater,
for his on work
and he
“Cretinism”
attempted
art’s for art sake dangerous attitude (Wilde).
the to
closer
lot a is
London
cey’s
the
1840s and in 1850s
He
was France. famous
of celebration forms symbolic (Ibsen), a and
READING
FURTHER
labyrinthine
and
dark
always
paces
Morel,
who on widely in the published of social topic and
economic conflict the (Zola),
exter
and
terrible, and
sublime,
ic,
be found
in
the of work Bénédict of Augustin in failure moral Vision
the
on focus
images
129—42.
pas 49,
Studies
hallucinatory Research and Masque.
Gothic
pnogogic
a The of roots theory of to
degeneration
in are
to Zola
order account
a he what for as saw
Quincey’s
Dc
Klosterheim: opium
the
of
(1981)
L.
R. analysis the
Snyder,
through
:1
logical
of the
construction abnormal. of range
writers Ibsen, including and Wilde,
Black. A&C creativ
and
Edinburgh:
memory,
if-awareness,
the import ideo form’s within
conceptually of forms siècle art. Nordau
a
vols. grouped 14
disparate
Masson),
D. ted.
Quincey
the De
with
Thomas
psychology,
and
iation
guage of
that
the “otherness” of could Gothic
as
troubling
regarded commentators, Writings
fin-dc- Collected
The
(1889) T.
Quincey,
IDe
meditations
but
addiction of
ictions
how
of theories
a lan elaborated degeneration for and he, what
other
cultural reactionary
not
are
these
implicit,
is
author he
REFERENCES
to
is it this to appreciate to important an consider
context in one artistic to order account
pariah
the
Although
Journalism.
disease, the body, and race, In
order decadence. a from or
medical criminal symptomology
New
anticipating
while
narrative,
ry
the
Gothic’s fin-de-siècle with tion. engagement
However, idea Nordau of the
transposed
Gothic. Urban
forms
Enlightenment
and
vangelical
Terror;
a provide of more
that context general a Tales in underpins
culminate for movement eugenic regula
Romanticism;
ALSO:
SEE
follow
Confessions The
14).
I,
)rks:
shape
in novel Stoker’s but also they particular, an
that physiology idea
would
ultimately —
prose”
“impassioned as
described
SIÈCLE
of GOTHIC).
as Theories thus degeneracy
dwarf. potentially lurking within of types certain
wisecracking a
with
Wars
De
which
writing,
tobiographical
Tong
of the characteristic fin
de
siècle (see Francisco San Both and
Morel
FIN-OF- saw Lombroso the degeneracy
from girls
slave
rescues
self-exploration
surreal the
in
ized
who
aristocrat) that as Nordau Thomas a
regarded of troubling propensity.
descendant a
Quincey,” De
is
insight
metaphysical
This
130).
81:
amoral
“Gilbert
as foppishness (the Count played ite
of dissolute images
types Price of particular criminal
Vincent
Confessions,
the
and
illusion
between
balance
licate
of
Count’s
by version
him aligning degeneracy film an
with
faces as to ears) such 1962 in
order develop compos
Zugsmith’s
Albert In
sensitivity
his
through
explained
est
a
to 1849. dedication
in
the LombroSo), compounds faces the
of
photograph of (and criminals Blackwood’s parts in
published stories,
Gothic
the
to
attraction
stylistic
ey’s
eration was in first
Mail-Coach”
1892
published
terms, (carrying
and to
went English Lombroso to great lengths
“The
in
found
be
also
notes,
Snyder
L. R.
As
literal.
so
rarely
can Mina’s
to
Max
reference suspense whose Nordau, and Degen tion,
for
be should example, in seen
horror, physical
humor,
Dark
nalism.
was,
discourse
Gothic
the
with
Dnship
tion jour
as it and
his out marks innate letters
that was criminality.
his social various as issues in such
prostitu
present is
that
macabre
Quinc
De
works.
collected
his
from
and link
signifies
the Count’s violent the of
inherent in As degenera in society.
Morel, the
interest
understanding genuine
a
masking
have
to
tried
and
however,
narrative,
his irony
Crimiflat
Man (1876) 300). (Wolf 1975: The sustained who 126), to be
and
needed the from isolated
rest
humor
gallows the
tragedy,
an
with
zone
comfort
his
of
out
was
so’s
of the Aristotelian description in criminal archetypal the
and degenerate
type (Pick delinquent 1989: Sublime
the
considered
had
De
School.
Grammar
Free
chester
has Burke is noted, a that
of
a Cesare way of upon Lombro paraphrase
atavism notion in same
to order identify the
in
murders
horrible
of
experience
own
author’s
the
butes.
various
Crom as Harker’s
Leonard description
Wolf analyzes
on work Lombroso’s
criminality depended gleefully
Quincey
IDe
lecture,
regu
“tyrannical of set a
with
,tudents
journal
of
the
Count’s connoisseur’s attri a siècle
physiognomical Britain as
(Nordau). Presented
news.
general
example,
for
villain,
the
Landgrave,
the
Jonathan — had Harker
made earlier
his in alongside in the Italy
1870s trials and in fin-de (Lombroso)
murder
reported
which
autobiograph
disguised
thinly
and
Ce,
conclusion
Gazette, a is upon based that description similar of
contexts
as such political Westmouland upheaval the
of
aspects
sensational
Radclif
sequences,
dream
intense
of
the
(Stoker
to 1996: (see 342)
return a Her STOKER, of
BRAM). modelings was took
in place
degeneration
This
1854.
and 1839 in
metaphysical
wonderful
a
is
which
Nordau refined and
so Lombroso and classify would to him”
It
is thus not
that
re returned accidental subsequent he
which and
1827
in
Masque
The or, Kiosterheirn: iovel,
175 DEGENERATION
ON I RAT F N G E F ) 176 DICKENS, CHARLES DICKENS, CHAt them the possibility of a reversion to a more Theories of degeneration provide a very in Byron’s Don Juan: that “truth is stranger that the villain was compelled tc primitive state. useful way in which to explore the fin-de-siècle than fiction” (Byron 1902: 541) (see BYRON, crime (see CRIME). The dog Lior A novella such as R. L. Stevenson’s The Gothic because those theories employ a lan GEORGE GORDON, SIXTH BARON). In the context Little Dorrit (1855—7), smelling ev Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886) guage of otherness and are shaped by fears of of Gothic, this implied that the true sphere of derer Rigaud and attacking him tacitly reworks a discourse of degeneracy regression that are so readily embraced by the terror lay not in remote times and Catholic as Gowan’s model in Venice, see (found, for example, in one of Nordau’s pre Gothic. The Gothic of the period, like Jekyll places but in the here and now of contem have derived from such readinl cursors: Edwin Lankester’s Degeneration: A and Hyde and Dracula, tacitly asserts that porary urban society (see URBAN GOTHIC). generally, Dickens’ partiality as Chapter in Darwin, 1880) in order to argue that models of civilization are not quite so safe or The emerging techniques of fianeurial realist “providential plotting” may owe the ostensibly civilized world of the bourgeois secure after all. writing and reportage — focused upon the this source. professions (such as medicine and the law) physiognomical signs of human appearance, More generally still, we m are ghosted by the possibility of a return to a SEE ALSO: Anti-Semitism; Disability; Fin-de with the supposedly disinterested passer-by whether this “shiftiness” in The Ti more savage identity (see STEVENSON, ROBERT Siècle Gothic; Imperial Gothic; Race; Stevenson, engaging in a fashionable new activity of helped the young writer to percei LouIs). However, more radically it could be Robert Louis; Stoker, Bram; Wells, H. G. (Herbert detecting urban mysteries and observing and fiction as it then stood was anythi: argued that the novella claims that it is an George). interpreting what he saw in the streets of great and stable or fully evolved ge adherence to middle-class rituals that develops cities — gave birth to a new version of Gothic instead eminently suitable and r monsters of its own. Henry Rider Haggard that came to maturity in the Victorian period, ployment. Having presumably i REFERENCES explored in depth the relationship between in the work of Dickens and Willde Collins time read Mrs. Radcliffe and 01 savagery and civilization via a nuanced critique Stoker, B. (1996 118971) Dracula. Oxford: Oxford above all (see COLLINS, WILKIE). Gothic writers such as Mary Shel of degeneration in She (1887), in which the University Press. Dickens had nevertheless begun as a pretty Dickens refers, as we shall see, in C presence of fallen empires is used as a gloss for Pick, D. (1989) Faces of Degeneration: A European average consumer of fairly standard Gothic or tions (1860—1)), the flâneur/narrai 1848—1918. Cambridge, UK: Cam L contemporary concerns about British empire Disorder, c. r sub-Gothic reading matter. As a boy in the by Box (1836) shows himself rea bridge University Press. building (see IMPERIAL GOTHIC). H. G. Wells, 1820s, he regularly imbibed terror from such to effect such realignments. For Punter, D. (1996) The Literature of Terror: The weekly sources as The Portfolio of Entertaining “The Bloomsbury Christening” who was a trenchant critic of the misuse of Modern Gothic. New York: Longman. and Instructive Varieties in History and The Ter London street transport through Darwin in theories of degeneration (see his Wolf, L. (1975) Annotated Dracula. London: C. N. spectacles: “Cabs whisked about,’ critique of Lankester in “Zoological Retrogres Potter. rific Register: A Record of Crimes, Judgments, sion,” 1891) also explored the image of threat Providences and Calamities. We may pick out as carefully boxed up behind two ened empire in The War of the Worlds (1898) the word “Providences” from the latter title to curtains as any mysterious pictt and the relationship between the human and FURTHER READING highlight a fundamental ambivalence in its Mrs Radcliffe’s castles” (Dickens effect is one of making the far the nonhuman in The Island of Dr. Moreau Greenslade, W. (1994) Degeneration, Culture and pages, which betray a transparently hypocriti The (1896) (see WELLS, H. G. (HERBERT GEORGE)). the Novel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University cal appetite, not unfamiliar before or since in Gothic seems here to consort well These concerns were given an aesthetic twist Press. such publications, for simultaneously indulg rator’s aim of achieving a psei byWdde in The Picture ofDorian Gray (1891), Hurley, K. (1996) The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Mate ing in and deploring sensation. The Terrific detachment that will enable him where the representation of the double life rialism, and Degeneration at the Fin-De-Siècle. Register offered a rather monotonous cata a “physiology” or anthropolog (mapped in Jekyll and Hyde) works against the Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. logue of grisly crimes while attempting at urban life. Victorian Demons: Medicine, Mas novel’s apparent endorsement ofWalter Pater’s Smith, A. (2004) all times to maintain high moral ground by But Dickens goes further culinity and the Gothic at the Fin-de-Sidcle. Man art for art’s sake ethos (in which Dorian insisting that murder will always out, in conse another, more polemical, refer chester: Manchester University Press. becomes bad art by trying to cultivate beauty). quence of a “providential” unseen divinity Radcliffe in Sketches by Box (se It is, however, Dracula that explicitly ex that mysteriously intervenes in human affairs ANN). In “Criminal Courts,” goin{ plores the concern that the middle-class pro to ensure that evil will sooner or later be Prison, the narrator’s peripatetic fessional harbors within him the possibility of Dickens, Charles punished. “The Dog of Montargis” of French glimpse of what lies inside the fot a degenerative decline. Much of this concern is foildore is a representative exhibit from The of this modern “Castle of Udo focused through the figure ofthe recently qual MICHAEL HOLLINGTON Terrific Register that obviously left its mark on triggers a meditation on the ified solicitor, Jonathan Harker, who is required Dickens. In medieval times, his owner having prison visitor Elizabeth Fry in re to transform himself from bourgeois pen Charles Dickens (18 12—70) shot to fame in the been murdered in his presence, this dog is Radcliffe: “We have a great respe pusher to heroic man of action. This also 1830s, and as he did he effected decisive and supposed to have betrayed such regular signs but she certainly ought to have makes clear, as do the other texts mentioned lasting change in the history of Gothic fiction. of aggression toward the perpetrator that he romances than Mrs Radcliffe” (F here, how much such concerns are imbricated Essentially, he fastened on to a Romantic was eventually licensed to take part in a trial 161). Here we encounter for thi clearest I by combat in which he fought so ferociously Dickens’ writing the cutting ed with a discourse of masculinity. paradox enunciated at its simplest and
nally
in
his 1848.) Russian published and religious
characters The political Facrie romance
his
and
physical, as
depravity
mental
the
takes
story
the
within,
from
felt
Oxford: pp.
Classics, Oxford
World 1—56.
:down
(Origi
in of tained
mode
and
contrast in
juxtaposition interested as is
he
heart, its
at
invariably
are
mental
of
depiction A
him. Creature and
Other
(trans. Stories Myers). A. know to
s
a Edmund nature. sus would employ Spenser oppressed
and
impoverished
the While
version.
who
junior
F. (1999)
Golyadkin
A Dostoevsky,
In nights.”
“White Gentle, Mr
a
discovers
per and virtue vice,
was in sexual
dualistic fundamentally and
violence, sin,
suicide,
evil,
with
Golyad
Mr in lished
1872.) Russian where
(1846),
Double The des
and highly
of
depictions preoccupied
conventionalized
is
Dostoevsky
work, his
all
In
Oxford: writing Oxford World Classics. pub (Originally early
comic
darkly
ostoevsky’s
medieval
drama, its morality
with
schematic
doppelganger.
another is
M. F. R. (trans.
Devils (1999) Kratz). Dostoevsky,
seizures.
epileptic by
complicated
and body soul,
and behest, good evil.
Accordingly, Ivan’s
at
supposedly
patricide
in (Originally
Russian published
commits 1879—80.)
empky
to
related
hemorrhaging
from
.81 who
companying
between distinctions metaphysical
Smerdyakov,
half-brother I. (trans.
Avsey). Oxford:
Oxford World epileptic Classics.
his
died
He
infancy. in
children
two
of
oss
sical
ac its endeavors
through philosophical Meanwhile, self.
darker F.
The (1998) Ivan’s Dostoevsky,
Brothers Karamazov of
manifestation
despite
years,
later
in
respite
brought
-iage a be
both thought which and reified may clas reworked who
in 1868.) lished
Russian Devil, the
with
converses
azov
second
A
experience.
and
nature
own is
a theology, Christian Karam pervasive Oxford: of system Oxford World Ivan
Classics.
pub (Originally
(1879—80),
Brothers
Karamazov
extremes
perilous
the
on
draws
(1867),
bier
Idiot The The Dostoevsky, F.
(1998) A. by (trans. was easily Myers).
rise of the assimilated novel,
Judeo
final his
in
redemption, or
nation
The
least
not
work,
his
Mi
family. 1866.) in
(Originally her’s published Russian
dam
by
variously articulated eithr and Plato
Aristotle toward
Raskolnikov
companying
his
after
look J. to
need
the
and Coulson). World Oxford Oxford: Classics. habit
bling
ac
of
Western The civilization selves itself. dualism alternative
like
seem
Svidrigaylov
a
to
due
poverty
F.
direst and Crime Dostoevsky, (1998)
in
(trans.
Punishment
(1866),
ishment and
may be as erature
as far back traced the origins Marmeladov,
Razumikhin, as
characters
and
Crime
in lished
1847.)
Russian novel,
celebrated
most
his
te
such
of
doubles lit in and doubling Manifestations
Punishment
and
Crime
in
Where
pp.
swine.
He
sworth:
Penguin,
brother. 131—214. (Originally pub
his
killed
disease
the
year e
of
herd
a
into devils
sending
Jesus
of
Gospel Other
D.
Stories (trans.
McDuff). That
Harmond
1864.
in
tuberculosis
of
die
her
see
rto
Luke’s
DALE St. SHEND TOWN
in
story
the
from
is
F.
Dostoevsky,
In The (1988)
epigraph Poor landlady.
folk and
1857,
in
wife
first
his
married he
There k. novel’s
The
being.
demonic 1846.)
possibly
Doubles
another
Semipala
in
Regiment
Siberian the
into is
Stavrogin
which
in
(1872), Penguin. in (Originally published 1864, Russian
Devils
produced
conscrip
and
Omsk,
in
imprisonment
he ad,
(1868), J.
the
Idiot
(trans.
Double in The Coulson).
HarmondsWorth
Mishldn
Prince
of
ter
firing by
execution mock
a
endured
he th,
charac
F. the Dostoevsky,
Notes (1987) from
and Underground through
ideal
Christian
the
of tion
to
Sentenced
Revolutions.
European
the Russian
1866.) 1864,
dramatiza
Dostoevsky’s
following
Lazarus.
wake
the in
threat
a
as
in
seen Faber. Contrast.
London: were
who Oxford of World cle, in Classics. (Originally published story
the
him
read
Marmeladov
Sonya
tute
Petrashevsky
the
of G.
Steiner, }. or (1960) Tolstoy An Essay
Dostoyevsky:
and member a The (trans. Gambler Kentish). Oxford: as
sted
prosti
that
demanding
by
sustenance
spiritual
was
he
1849
in NY: Ithaca,
Press. Cornell
him, University
Dostoevsky, F.
Notes haunt (1983) the from
to Underground
enough not
seeks re
finally
and
delirious, returns
murder,
J. to
P. Scanlon,
(2002) The
misfortunes Thinker. DostoyevskY: 1862.)
these
If
life. his
throughout
-es
room
coffin-like his
leaves
Raskolnikov
Rodion
Novels. Major Bristol: sei Press. Bristol Classical
had World
Classics. in
(Originally
published Russian
Dostoevsky
childhood,
from
leptic
burial:
premature
of
the
R. Peace, (1992) of An the DostoyeVsky resurrects the
Examination Dead
R. An (trans. Hingley).
Oxford: serfs. Oxford
his
by
murdered
possibly
iously,
Punishment
and
Crime
society.
Press.
from
Dostoevsky,
F.
retreated of the Memoirs (1983) from House
mys
died and
estate
country
a
to
retired has
or,
who
man
a
from
Tradition. UK: diatribe
Cambridge, I Cambridge University
semilunatic a
the
for
Hospital
Mariinsky
at REFERENCES
doctor is a
her,
(1864)
G.
and Pattison,
the (2001) Dostoyevsky Underground
Christian from
Notes
ceration.
alcoholic
His
16.
was
he
when
)erculosis incar of
ford, CA:
Stanford Press. University
nightmare
the of
account
an
(1862),
to
mother
his
lost
he
children,
six
of
:ond of
Dead Novels the
and Poetics Cultural
Critique. Stan the
of
House
the
of
I
Memoirs to
led
ment
the
1821,
in
Moscow
in
Born
(1993) H. Murav,
biography. Holy Thrillers; foolishness: )th;c DostoyevskY’S
Ann;
imprison Radcliffe, Russian Gothic.
His
work. major
Dostoevsky’s
in
distinctly
his
to
much
owe
bridge,
UK:
may
Cambridge Press. University
Joyce
plorations abound Carol; Poe,
Allan; Edgar dead Psychological
living the
and
demons,
Ghosts,
psychological
in
ings
Dostoyevsky’s Realism. fantastic Cam
Dostoevsky’s
of
depth SEg
The ALSO:
Doubles; European Oates, writing. Gothic;
mature
Dostoevsky’s
characterizes
M. Jones,
(2005) After
DostoyevskY Read Bakhtin:
faith.
that ristian
verisimilitude
psychological
with
intensity
own
Press. University
Dostoevsky’s
promote they
ability than
gly to tortuous such give to
the depth
genre. of
blending
the
anticipates
Nights”
Exchange
1760—1960.
Manchester:
Manchester convinc
more
often
experience,
of
But
few
ments “White
writers
can compete with
Double,
Dostoevsky’s The
Like
also.
mind
A. own Homer,
(ed.) his A
Gothic: (1992)
European
Spirited
darkest
the
I reflect
They
events.
unnerving
perhaps id penumbric Carol
Joyce Qates. and
postmodernist
her,
lose
to only
bridge
in lished 1929.) Russian
Petersburg
stairways,
shadowy
corridors,
St. from
a austrophobic the
on murky
to
girl the Franz modernist,
Kafka,
dream
his finds of University Press.
Minnesota who pub
(Originally
youth
tive
poverty, I
crushing
imaginings,
wild
Nietzsche,
reams,
Freud, and overimagina.
numerous novelists, an
(trans. C. Poetics about Emerson). MN: again Minneapolis, is
(1848)
Nights”
waking
nightmares,
monstrous
turn, souls,
his
“White )rtured
writing has
M. such as influenced M.
Bakhtin, figures of (1984)
reclusion. Problems
DostoyeVsky’s
to him
returns
Rejection
with
filled
are
and
doppelganger,
i
a most
trough I Press. parricide. extreme and
states
In darkest recesses.
epileptic
an as described
best
beauty
dramatized
struggles
psychological
M. most ed TX: Holquist).
of Austin, internal,
Texas a f University
Gothic
he where for
the explores mind’s
falls who
dreamer
a
about
is
(1847)
form
the
in
sometimes
evil,
and
Four C. Essays (trans.
M. & Emerson
good Hoiquist; - etween
his at and realism, its is work L
“The
(see
DOUBLES).
allowed
usually
confrontations
enact M. M.
Bakhtin, The
(1981)
Dialogic novels Imagination:
His
tial.
His chiller.
convention subject primary and matter is style
contemporary
than
psychology
of
and
Pushkin,
Poe,
Hoffman,
Dickens, realms
represent as rs
the
of furthest
reaches poten human deeper
into
READING fuRTHER
doppelganger the
of
writ such I
admire
to came subsequently ie
189
DOUBLES
FYODOR DOSTOEVSKY, 88 t
DOUBLES 190 DOU
once their opposites or mirrored “negatives” Queene (1590, 1596), and later, John Milton readers. The eventual exposure of his turpi Wieland’s Private History of Fere been explored and found wanting. would exploit the dualisms of Protestant have tude, however, brings about his death, and the Philosopher (1791), and arguably with the publica Christianity with his epic account of the stri,lg However, it is only from this moment onwards in the history of Chamisso’s Peter Schlemthls William Godwin’s Caleb Williams: Or, gle between light and dark, good and evil in tion of the Gothic aesthetic, an intimate relationship Geschichte (1814), in which the figures Things They Are in 1794 that the double Paradise Lost (1667, 1674), doubling the as between doubling and death, splitting and ter sells his shadow to the devil, b assumes of the features that the trope, in of God and Satan accordingly. Doubles seem some mortality is set firmly in place. relinquishes a considerable porti also to have been the particular provenance of its most characteristic forms, would come to Demonstrably under the influence of Lewis, soul. The double also featured p display British Gothic fiction of the late Shakespearean comedy, particularly as wit in E. T. A. Hoffmann’s first novel, The Devil’s selected works by such other Ge eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries (see nessed in the systematic coupling and uncou Etixirs (1814), at once consolidated earlier of the Romantic period as Rair GODWIN, WILLIAM). this text, the political pling, the pointed comparison and contrast of In fictional representations of the double, as and heck. But it was probably in Godwin’s earlier treatise lovers, siblings, spaces, genders, and sexualities tensions addressed well as setting in place many of the character Richter’s novels Siebenkas (1796- Concerning Political Justice (1793) are in such plays as A Ivlidsummer Night’s Dream Enquiry istics upon which subsequent manifestations (1800) that Hoffmann encounte given fictional realization in the suspicious, (1600), Twelfth Night(1601, 1623), andAs You of the trope would come to rely (see I40f F influential treatment of the d mutually antagonistic relationship between MANN, E.T.A. Like It (1599, 1623). (ERNST THEODOR AMADEUS)). literature of his day. Indeed, the eponymous and his employer, Mr. And yet, as most studies of the literary the Caleb Consequently, the text is habitually regarded Richter not only upon Hoffmar Albeit the same extent as in double assert, it is only with the rise of Roman Falkiand. not to as a seminal work in the development of the writers and critics from the ninet subsequent Gothic fictions, soon becomes ticism in Europe during the latter half of the it literary double, be it in Britain, Europe, through to the present day, is atte doubles of eighteenth century that the trope would come clear that Caleb and Falidand are America or further afield. Hoffmann would continued use of the term Doppe ROMANTICISM). another, with the former, as William into its own (see The particu one continue to exploit the fictional possibilities of ally “double-goer”), first used an Hazlitt pointed out The Spirit of the Age lar form that the double would assume during in the double in such fictions as “The Story of footnote in Siebcnkas, as a means period, together with the specific textual (1825), serving as the externalized conscience the Lost Reflection,” this “The Doubles,” and “The resenting and critically describinl latter’s systematic abuse of aristocratic functions that it would come to fulfill, render for the Sandman.” Throughout the novel, Monk nonliterary manifestations of the
— power. Moreover, Falkiand himself is doubled the literary double a decidedly though by no Medardus is doubled with Count Viktorin, his Recasting the ever-shifting po
— the novel with another one of his adversar identical means exclusively Gothic affair. With hind in alter ego and half-brother through between the pursuer and the pu Barnabas Tyrrel, well as with Gines, his sight, it is easy to see that Horace Walpole in ies, as the paternal line; predictably, visual misrecog father’s Caleb Williams, Mary She pursuer rapidly becomes the pursued, The Castle of Otranto (1764) unwittingly ren spy. The nitions and confusions of identity, both fortu kenstein (1818, 1831) would cc master and slave continuously dered the nascent Gothic aesthetic a rich and and the roles of itous and unfortunate, abound. As both an simple distinction between the sel place: many pairs of later Gothic fertile seed-bed for the double in his expressed change like agent of supernatural import and a psycho avowed other by figuring the Cn doubles, Caleb and fa&land are mutually logical intentions to yoke together in his tale not only projection of the disavowed aspects monstrous externalization of as the antithetical forces of the modern novel locked into a complex dynamic of shifting of Medardus’ own psyche, Count Viktorin, creator’s own psyche (see SHF power relations. In a rapid reversal of fortunes like and the ancient romance, but also the crucial Ambrosio’s secret self in The Monk, facili WOLLSTONECRAFT). Acting out, in the novel, each character comes differences in dramatic mode (comedy and at the end of tates his double’s negotiation of lust, pride, and the scripts of Victor’s own repre culpability, while tragedy, laughter and sublimity) and their to acknowledge his own other compromising pleasures. While the the monster, Victor soon realizes, acknowledging of his adversary. attendant relations to class (the lofty status of the virtues influence of The Devil’s Elixirs on subsequent vampire, my own spirit let Loose fre preoccupation religious the nobility, the humble deportment ofthe ser Matthew Lewis’ with manifestations of the double in British Gothic (Shelley 1992: 78). With Frank-ens double standards in The Monk vants) (see wALPOLE, HORACE). Doubling the hypocrisy and fiction during the period cannot be overem trality of the double to the Gothi (1796) would do much to galvanize the trope phasized, formal strictures of fact with the unrestrained it is also important to acknowledge been assured. Picking up on the F a Romantic imaginings of fancy, Otranto also includes of the double in Gothic fiction of the the extent to which Hoffmann himself was the of earlier treatments of the litei period (see LEWIS, MATTHEW). In this romance, child in its preoccupations with turpitude and ille of his literary milieu. Doubles, in fact, the Irish Protestant clergyman Cli doubling identifiable between two separate had gitimacy, both political and familial, mirror- the featured significantly in the earlier work of Maturin would fashion an ex characters earlier fictions reworked the images oftheir opposite: romantic love in place in Gothic is major German Romantics in the last few of Gothic doubling between a individual, father Ambro of incestuous embrace, ideal fathers in place in the figure of one decades of the eighteenth century: Schiller tempter and his various victims and of paternal tyranny. A similar scheme of dou sio, the monk of the novel’s title. Split would effect the doubling ofthe brothers Franz the Wanderer (1820). The influe romances divided between a public self of religious piety, and bling occurs throughout the Gothic Karl Moor in Die Rlluber (1781), while Jean Paul and Hoffmann upon the c RAD and respect, on the one hand, and a Goethe of Ann Radcliffe during the 1790s (see authority, would undertake a careful doubling of British literature was assured by private of blasphemy and illicit passion, on of CLIFFE, ANN), in which a range of bourgeois self Faust and Mephistopheles in the first part ance of R. P. Gillies’ English tr moral the other, Ambrosio pursues his path of base of Faust values pertaining to property and place, (1808). Other examples of doubles Hoffmann’s TheDevil’sElixirsin 1 8 the novel’s in ity and marriage are eventually set in place only desiring beyond the eyes of all but German literature of the period include ing to Hoffmann together with
I
in
of the
to ing period German literature include such with
together other Hoffmann
novel’s
the
but
all
of
eyes the
beyond
desiring
only
place
in
set
eventually
are
of arriage
faust of Other (1808). examples doubles
1824. Hoffmann’s Respond base
TheDevit’sEliXirsin of
path
his
pursues
Ambrosio
other,
the
moral
place,
and
property
to
of rtaining and Faust
R. of ance the P. first Gillies’ part of English fl on translation Mephistopheles
passion,
illicit
and
blasphemy
of
self
private
bourgeois
of
range
a
which in
a
Goethe
would NN), by of British doubling careful undertake was the a assured literature appear
and
hand,
one the
on
respect, and
authority,
(see RAD
1790s
the
during
and tadcliffe in Karl
Die
Moor while Jean (1781), and Rauber upon the Paul
Hoffmann
development piety,
religious of
self public a
between
divided
romances
Gothic
the
throughout
urs
would of the effect the
Franz doubling brothers The of (1820). both
influence Wanderer and
tile
Split
title.
novel’s
the
of
monk
the
sio,
dou
of
scheme
similar
A
tyranny.
al
of the decades Schiller and in century: his tempter eighteenth
various victims Melmoth
Ambro
father
individual,
one
of
figure
the
in
place
in
fathers
ideal
embrace, the bus
the of few in major a last German Romantics doubling Gothic between
supernatural
reworked is fictions
Gothic
earlier in
characters
place
in love
romantic
opposite:
had
their
the in of work earlier featured an significantly fashion would Maturin tale extended
separate
two
between
identifiable
doubling
the
mirror
familial,
and
political
both
of child his in the fact, milieu. literary Irish Doubles,
Charles clergyman Robert
Protestant
romance,
this In
MATTHEw).
(see
LEWIS,
period
ille
and
turpitude
with
the occupations
to of which extent the Hoffmann
earlier was himself of the literary double, treatments
Romantic
the
of
fiction
Gothic
in
double
the
of
includes
also
Otranto
fancy,
of it gs
to is up also
phasized been on the Picking important assured. echoes acknowledge Faustian
trope
the
galvanize
to
much do
would
(1796)
unrestrained
the
with
fact
of
fiction the :rictures
to be during of the the trality cannot period
overem double had mode Gothic
Monk
The
in
standards
double and
hypocrisy
the
Doubling
HORACE).
of
the in WALPOLE, 78). British double ce With manifestations cen the 1992: (Shelley Gothic
Frankenstein,
religious
with
preoccupation
Lewis’
Matthew
5cr-
the
of
deportment
humble the
ity,
on of influence Etixirs The my Devil’s let own the subsequent from spirit vampire, loose
grave”
adversary.
his
of
virtues
the
acknowledging
of status
lofty
(the
class to
relations
other
the the While
“my is soon pleasures. it Victor monster, own realizes,
while compromising
culpability,
own
his
acknowledge
to
their and
sublimity)
and
tates laughter
his lust,
of of double’s the own and pride, scripts negotiation Victor’s
desires, repressed
comes
character
each
novel, the
of
end
the
at
and
(comedy
mode
dramatic
in like
:es
in self secret Ambrosio’s facili The
Acting Monk, in out,
senses, some
WOLLSTONECRAFT).
fortunes
of
reversal
rapid a
In
relations.
power
crucial
the
also
but
romance,
of
ancient
own Count psyche, Medardus’ own creator’s Viktorin, (see psyche
MARY SHELLEY, shifting
of
dynamic
complex a
into
locked
novel
modern
the
of
forces
thetical logical the of
its of of aspects disavowed projection monstrous aspects
externalization
mutually
are
falidand
and
Caleb
doubles,
only
not
tale
his
in
together
yoke
to
agent ns
by of and a import the as other avowed supernatural psycho
figuring the Creature Gothic
later
of
pairs
many
like
place:
change
expressed
his
in
double
the
for
itous
and ed-bed As an both
abound. unfortunate, its the simple dis and self
between distinction
continuously
slave
and
master of
roles
the
and
and
rich a
aesthetic
Gothic
nascent
w nitions
both of and fortu 1831) identity, confusions kenstein any (1818, would
confound
pursued,
the
becomes
rapidly
pursuer
The
spy.
ren
unwittingly
(1764)
Otranto
the
of
visual line; ;tle
paternal misrecog
Caleb in Mary father’s predictably Williams, fran Shelley, his
Gines, with
as
well
as
Tyrrel,
Barnabas
ies,
in
Walpole
Horace
that
see
to
easy
is identical
ego alter and the in and between the through her pursuer half-brother
pursued
adversar his
of
one
another
with
novel
the
in
hind- With
affair.
Gothic
is
xclusively Medardus with — Count doubled his Viktorin, the Recasting
power ever-shifting relations
doubled is
himself
faildand
Moreover,
power.
no
by
though
decidedly
— a
double
the ary novel, Sandman.” of Monk the nonliterary Throughout double.
manifestations aristocratic
of
abuse
systematic
latter’s
the
for
render
fulfill, to
come
would
it
the that Lost ns
“The and Doubles,” Reflection,”
resenting “The and literary critically and describing
conscience
externalized the as
serving
(1825),
textual
specific
the
with
together the
in
double nod, of as such
Story in “The fictions of
rep both footnote a Siebenkäs, means
Age
as the of
Spirit
The in out
pointed
Hazlitt
during
assume
would
double
the
to that
the continue a
of exploit ally fictional a used
in and first possibilities glossed “double-goer”),
William
as
former, the with
another,
one
particu
The
(see RoMANTIcIsM).
America own or
afield. further
term the would Hoffmann of use of (liter continued
Doppelgaflger
doubles
are
faildand
and
Caleb
that
clear
come
would
trope
the
that
century
literary
it in nth be double, to Britain, the by to is Europe,
day,
the attested through present
becomes
soon
it
fictions,
Gothic
subsequent
the
of
half
latter
the
during
as a
Europe
in in of work seminal
the the and
development from in the critics writers century
nineteenth as
extent
same
the
to
not
Albeit
Falkiand.
Roman-
of
rise
the
with
only is it
assert,
is
the text habitually upon only not regarded Richter upon but Mr. Consequently, Hoffmann,
employer,
his
and
Caleb
eponymous
the
literary
the
of
studies
most
as
yet,
I
MANN, of the day. his Indeed, literature E.T.A. of (ERNST influence AMADEUS)). THEODOR between
relationship
antagonistic
mutually
1623). of
the
(1599,
come would trope to rely (see the of in influential
the treatment double HOFF
suspicious,
the in
realization
fictional
given
Yoti
As
and
1623),
Night(1601, istics Twelfth
which upon that (1800) subsequent
the manifestations most are Hoffmann
encountered (1793)
Justice
Political
Concerning
Enqtnry
Dream
Night’s
Midsummer A
as
well plays in as
many setting of place the
character Richter’s i (1796—7) novels
and Siebenkäs Titan treatise
earlier
Godwin’s in
addressed
tensions
sexualities
and
genders,
spaces,
fictional siblings, of the and
as it Tieck. double, But was Paul representations
in Jean probably political
the
text, this In
WILLIAM).
GODWIN, of
contrast
and
comparison
Elixirs pointed at the
(1814), once of the as earlier consolidated
period Romantic (see Heine, Raimund,
centuries
nineteenth
early
and
eighteenth
uncou
and
coupling
systematic I. the A. in
first The novel,
by selected Hoffmann’s . Devil’s such works late
German other writers
the
of
fiction
Gothic
British in
display
wit-
as
particularly
comedy,
the of 3pearean soul. Demonstrably
Lewis, under also The influence double in featured to
prominently come
would
forms,
characteristic
most
its
of
provenance
particular the
been
mortality is in have
set a place. firmly of
own his in portion relinquishes
considerable
trope,
the that
features the
of
some
assumes
seem
Doubles
accordingly.
Satan
between and
and d and death,
his ter splitting doubling to sells so the in but devil, shadow
doing
double
the that
1794
in Are
The)’
as
Things
figures
the
doubling
1674),
(1667,
the
Lost Gothic
an aesthetic, ise intimate (1814), relationship the in
which Geschichte titular Or, charac
Williams: Caleb
Godwin’s
William
of
tion
in
evil
and
good
dark,
and
light from this
of the tween
in history onwards moment Peter Chamisso’s Schlemihls
wundersame
publica
the
with
only
arguably
is
it
However,
strug
the
of
account
epic
his
tude, with
tianity his brings the about however,
and death, and (1791), von Adalbert Philosopher
wanting.
found
and
explored
been
have
Protestant
of
dualisms
the
readers. exploit
of J The eventual
turpi his exposure
of Private Wieland’s History Proteus Peregrinus
“negatives”
mirrored or
opposites
their
once
Milton
John
later, and 1596), (1590, w
191 DOUBLES DOUBLES I 192 DOUBLES DOUBL] contemporary accounts of psychological (1842). The particular inflection given the Stevenson in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde also Being Earnest (1895) and “The duality as The Confession of Nicol Muschett of Gothic double in Poe’s “William Wilson” is brought Fishei the trope to bear upon some of the His Soul” Boghall (reprinted 1818) and Life of David highly significant, for, in place of the forms (1891). quasiscientific discourses of his day, including Though Haggard, James Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, of moral turpitude figured in the doubles of Andrew I. Webber’s study, evolutionary theory and its corollary, degen pelgãnger anonymously published The Private Memoirs numerous earlier texts, the identical (1996), is primarily concej double in eration; the criminology of writers and Confessions of such as examples from German literature, a Justified Sinner in Edin this story, rendered singular only through his Cesare Lombroso; and the nascent science of what it identifies as the burgh in 1824 (see HOGG, JAMEs). As in Hoff- barely audible whisper, is his host-subject’s sexology. characteri Into this already heady mix, te reso of the double mann, the doubling that occurs here is between morally better self, a voice of rectitude and might fruitfully be a nances of a curiously split and divided autho Gothic two half-brothers, Robert Wringhim and conscience. Nonetheless, the havoc doubles in the British and he wreaks rial biography inevitably found their way. George Colwan, themselves doubles for their The traditions from the nineteenth centur) is no less deadly than in other examples, as respectable Dr. Jekyll variously encounters, through his (Webber 1996: 3—5). for as the assumed paternal figures, as well as Wilson, finally confronting his double before a dependence fictio: upon a Hoffrnanesque elixir, a venson and through Wringhim and the demonic Gil- mirror, presages in the glass his own death. Wilde so clearly demons beast-like double of monstrous proportions, Gothic Martin, a thinly disguised satanic tempter; in Albeit not always in a distinctly Gothic vein, double, though not without its ent-ering with him, like so many of his fictional both fictions, the double is, at once, an agent of counterparts, is primarily a visual p doubles would feature in Russian literature of precursors, into a carefully choreographed non. Articulating a post-Cartesian supernatural power and the embodiment of the 1830s and 1840s, particularly in such stories dance splil of hide and seek, persecution and para the mind and disavowed aspects of the host’s self. In Hogg’s by Gogol as “The Nose” (1836) and “The Over the body, the literary noia. Divested of its relations to the Supernatu intimately Gothic fiction, double begets double, en abyme, coat” (1843), and most famously in Dos inscribed in the nineteenth ral, the alter ego in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde as Gil-Martin begins to assume features of discursive invention of sexuality (Rog both toevsky’s humorous treatment of duplicity in is the product of contemporary science, the 15; Webber 1996: 12). Bearing brothers. Hogg’s thematic treatment of doubles his novel The Double of 1846. beast-like testam vestiges of humankind’s animal ever-shifting relationship is matched by the formal construction of the In mid-nineteenth-century Britain, the origins, between the queer impulsions of man’s poly and the alter narrative: the story told by an editor is retold by double appears to have fallen somewhat out of ego, the self and its di morphously perverse sexuality. aspects, Wringhim, the justified sinner, in the second literary vogue. However, it would resurface, the double is intimately i Four years later, Oscar Wilde would put the within the part of the text, both versions serving to consti albeit in considerably less intense power-dynamics of ma a form, in Gothic double to similar use in his exploration tute a “double vision” of the events slave. For Robert Alter, this makes th therein Charlotte Brontë’s treatment of the relation of the divided psyche in The Picture of Donna fundamentally violent and described. Hogg would also return to a formal ship between Bertha Mason and Jane Eyre Gray aggressive I (1891). Self-consciously referring back start (Alter and thematic treatment of the double in the in her 1847 novel of that name, Emily 1986: 1190). Invariably alli while not only to the doubling effects of the story ccStrange Letter of a Lunatic” portrait doubles that have come before, the (1830). Bronte would consistently double names, in the Gothic fictions of Radcliffe, Lewis, and double is intertextual by its very The transmission of the double across the appearances, identities, and actions in Wuther his natur kinsman Maturin, but also to Poe’s treat The Picture Atlantic to America was largely the work of ing Heights (1847). Other significant examples of Dorian Gray itself all ment of similar concerns in “The Oval Por Charles Brockden Brown, who, under earlier works, so more recent Gothic dc the of the double in mid-Victorian fiction, and trait,” Wilde in Donian Gray parallels the undertaken in such texts as influence of writers such as William Godwin, examples not always steeped in the Gothic aes hedonistic Will Self’s pursuits of his title character with a (2002) and would figure versions of the Gothic double in thetic’s characteristic responses of horror and Oliver Parker’s Donian Gra3 series of horrid changes inflicted upon a veiled texts such as Wieland: Or, the Transformation, rework, with varying degrees of fide terror, include Wilkie Collins’ The Woman in and carefully concealed portrait. In an enact Wildean original. As its highly AnAmerican Tale (1798) and EdgarHuntty: Or, White (1859—60), Armadale (1864—6), as well allusive ment of the philosophy of Wildean aestheti Memoirs ofa Sleepwalker (1799). In indicates, the double itself is bound u accordance as the Frankensteinian relationship between cism, art, the novel suggests, facilitates the maddening dynamics of return with Godwinian precedents, both texts stage Pip and Magwitch in Dickens’ Great Expecta indulgences and re of a double life, a life of beauty, And although the ongoing antagonisms bound up in the dia tions (1861). Given the significance of doubling it is usually gendered as n stimulation, and indulgence, and one not Gothic lectic of master and slave, while neither charges to earlier Gothic modes, it double bears the capacity to th is unsurprising to entirely removed from that being pursued its particular rendition of the con distinctions between the sexes into d double with acknowledge that the Gothic renaissance of the currently by Wilde himself. As in Stevenson, even in its seemingly less ambiguous supernatural portent. The best-known practi Victorian fin de siècle brought with it at least though, ft the vanquishing of time and moral forms in the tioner of Gothic doubles in nineteenth-century two major contributions to the fiction of dou fiction of Djuna Barnes, I consequence that the double life in Dorian American fiction is undoubtedly Edgar Allan bleness. Du Maurier, and Angela Carter. Inspired by the real-life account of Gray apparently affords is only temporary, and As Stevenson and Wilde’s use Poe, most famously in his short story “William double-dealing in the life of Edinburgh’s in a of con hideous reversal of fortune, the double, rary theories Wilson” (1839), but also in the doubling of Deacon Brodie, Robert Louis Stevenson pub on evolution, criminolo1 though once the guarantor of Dorian’s narcis Lady Rowena Trevanion with Ligeia in the sexology suggest, fictional representat lished The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. sism, becomes the agent of death. Albeit not the double are inseparable from story of that name (1838), and the complex, Hyde in 1886 (see STEVENSON, ROBERT LOUIs). to the the I same sensational Gothic effects, Wilde cultural discourses death-inducing relationship between a paint While reinvigorating the fictional double of his on subjectivity with would continue to explore the theme of the they ing and its subject in “The Oval Portrait” fellow Scotsman are contemporary. In Europe, Hogg of six decades before, double life in such texts as The Importance of tists and psychiatric researchers of th
life
double
in
such
as texts
The
of
Importance tists before, and
decades psychiatric
the of researchers six early
of
Hogg
Scotsman
fellow
Portrait”
Oval
“The
would in
to
continue
the
explore
subject
of theme his the of they are
double
In
Europe, scien contemporary. fictional
the
reinvigorating
While
paint-
a
between
to
the
same
relationship
sensational Gothic
effects, :ing
Wilde
cultural
LOUIS). on discourses
with
ROBERT which subjectivity
(see STEVENSON,
1886
in
Hyde
complex,
the
and
sism,
(1838),
becomes the
agent of
death. name not Albeit Mr.
the .t
and double are
Jekyll
from inseparable the
Dr. of broader
Case
Strange
The
lished
the
in
Ligeia
with
though
once
the
of Trevanion
Dorian’s guarantor na pub narcis
sexology suggest,
Stevenson fictional of
Louis representations
Robert
Brodie,
Deacon
of
doubling
the
in
a in
also
hideous reversal but
of
the
fortune,
339), double,
rary on theories Edinburgh’s
of evolution, life
and
criminology, the
in
double-dealing
“William
story
Gray short
his
in
affords
is only
apparently of and imously
temporary As account
and Stevenson
use of Wilde’s
real-life contempo the
by
Inspired
bleness.
Allan
Edgar
undoubtedly
that consequence
the is
double life in iction dou Doria” of Du Maunier, and
Angela fiction Carter. the
to
contributions
major
two
nineteenth-century
in
though,
the
doubles
of time
and least )thic moral vanquishing at in
it forms the
of
fiction with Ujuna Barnes, Daphne brought
siècle
de
fin
Victorian
practi
best-known
by The
Wilde currently himself.
As
in portent. the
si
of in Stevenson, even
its
seemingly less
renaissance ambiguous feminine
Gothic
the
that
acknowledge
with
double
the of
entirely
from removed
that
rendition being to ar con
pursued
distinctions between
the unsurprising sexes is into
disarray,
it
modes,
Gothic
earlier to
charges
neither
while
stimulation, slave, and
and
and indulgence, one
not ster doubling
Gothic
of double the bears
to capacity
throw the significance
the
Given
(1861).
tions
dia
the
in
up
bound
a of indulgences
life, g a double
of life antagonisms beauty,
And Expecta is it
although usually Great
as
male, gendered the
Dickens’ in
Magwitch
and
Pip
stage
texts
both
cism,
art,
the
novel
precedents,
suggests, the facilitates rinian betweefl dynamics of return maddening
and
relationship repetition.
Frankensteinian
the
as
accordance
In
(1799). ment
of
the
of
philosophy
Sleepwalker well Wildean a
aestheti as
the indicates, double is up itself
(1864—6), in bound the
Armadale
(1859—60),
White
Or,
EdgarHuntty:
and and
carefully
(1798)
concealed In
in an Tale portrait. enact in
Woman Wildean original. As its The highly
allusive
nature Collins’
Wilkie
include
terror,
Ti-ansformation,
the series
of Or,
horrid
changes
a VVieland: upon inflicted and as veiled
with rework, horror varying of
of degrees fidelity, the
responses
characteristic
thetic’s
in
double
Gothic
the
of
hedonistic
of
pursuits his
title versions
a aes with character re and (2002)
Gothic Oliver
Parker’s the Dorian in Gray (2009)
steeped
always
not
examples
Godwin,
William
as
trait,”
such
Wilde
in Dorian
Gray
writers and parallels f the
in undertaken fiction, such as texts
Will Self’s
Dorian
mid-Victorian
in
double
the
of
the
under
who,
ment
of
Brown,
similar
in
concerns
“The Oval rockden
Por examples earlier
so works,
more
recent Gothic
significant doublings
Other
(1847).
Heights
ing
of
work
the
largely
his
was kinsman
Maturin, but to also
Poe’s America treat Tile Wuther of
in Pictrtre
Dorian Gray
itself actions to alludes and
identities,
appearances,
the
across
double in
the the
of
Gothic fictions
of
Lewis, Radcliffe, tnsmission and names,
is double by its
intertextUal double very
nature: just as
consistently
would
Brontë
(1830).
not lunatic”
a
to only
of
the
of
effects doubling Letter
the
Emily Inge portrait
doubles
that
have while come before,
the name,
Gothic
that
of
novel
1847
her
in
the
in
double
the
Gray of
(1891).
treatment Eyre referring back atic start
Jane (Alter 5eif_consci011sly
1986: 1190). and
to alluding invariably Mason
Bertha
between
ship
formal a
to
return
of
the also
divided would
The in
psyche
of Hogg
Dorian Picture relation the
violent fundamentally and of
from aggressive the
treatment
Bronte’s
Charlotte
therein
events
the of
Gothic
to
double
vision” in use
similar
in his ouble F exploration slave. or form, a
Alter,
Robert this
makes
intense the double less
considerably
in
albeit
consti
to
serving
Four
versions
later, years
Oscar both
would Wilde put text, the
resurface, within the
of would
master and it power-dynamit
However,
vogue.
literary
second
the
in
sinner,
justified
of perverse
sexuality. rnorphously the out a,
aspects, the is
double
somewhat
intimately inscribed fallen
have
to
appears
double
by
retold
is
editor an
onigins by
the
told
queer of impulsiofls
story the poly man’s the and
the alter
ego, the Britain, self
and its
disavowed
mid-nineteenth-century
In
the
of
construction
beast-like
formal
of
the vestiges
by
d animal humankind’s
relationship between the ever-shifting ego
1846.
of
Double
The
novel his
doubles
of
is treatment
the
of product thematic
in
contempora1’ Hogg’s the science,
duplicity 12). 1996: 15;Webber
of Bearing to
the testament
treatment
humorous
toevsky’s
both
of
features
ral,
assume the
to
alter ego
Dr. in
begins and Jekyll Mr.
Dos Hyde irtin in
of discursive
invention
sexuality famously (Rogers 1970:
most
and
(1843),
coat”
abyme, en
double,
noia.
begets
of its Divested
to double
relations the Over :fion,
supernatu
“The intimately
in
the and inscribed
(1836)
Nose” by
“The
jeteenth_centUry
as
Gogol
Hogg’s
In
self.
host’s
dance
of the of
and hide
seek,
and aspects
stories d persecution para
the mind
and such the body,
in the literary
is
double
particularly
1840s,
and
1830s
the
of
embodiment
the
and
into precurSOrS a
of
carefully power
non. ural
choreographed a literature
Articulating Russian split post-Cartesian
between in
feature
would
doubles
of
agent
an
once,
at
is,
with entering double
him, so like many
of
the
his
vein, ions, fictional
is Gothic counterparts,
a primarily
visual distinctly a
phenome in
always
not
Albeit
in
tempter;
satanic
beast-like
of double
disguised
monstrous
thinly a death.
proportiOns
Gothic double, own though not
his its
without glass auditory
the
in
presages
mirror,
Gil-
demonic
the
and
dependence a
a upon
a elixir, Wringhim before
and venson
so Wilde
offmanesqUe double clearly his the
demonstrate,
confronting
finally
Wilson,
as
well
as
figures,
respectable
paternal Dr.
as
Jekyll
encounters,
his assumed through i
1996: examples, (Webber 3—5).
for as the
of other
Ste fictions in
than
deadly
less
no
is
their
for
doubles
na1
themselves
biography inevitably
found way. their wreaks The Coiwan,
he traditions the
from havoc nineteenth century the onwards
Nonetheless,
conscience.
and
Wringhim
nances
a Robert of
curiously split
and
and
autho divided If-brothers,
Gothic in the doubles rectitude
British
and of
American voice
a
self,
better
morally
between is
here
sexology. occurs
that
Into this
already heady
mix, the reso doubling the of ie
double host-subject’s might
be fruitfully his
is to applied
whisper,
audible
barely
Hoff
in
As
Cesare JAMES).
HOGG, and his (see LombrOSO
the
1824
nascent of science it what
through as
the identifies
only
traits characteristic
singular
rendered
story,
this
Edin
in
Sinner
eration;
Justified a the
of
of in
writers criminology as such
zfessions double examples from
German literature, identical of much
the
texts,
earlier
numerous
Memoirs
Private
The
theory
of
and its voiutionary published
corollary,
degen iously doubles is (1996), petginger
the primarily in
concerned with
figured
turpitude
moral
of
Shepherd,
Ettrick
the
quasiscientific
Hogg,
of
his discourses
day, forms
James l, including the
Though s Andrew of
study,
J.Webber place TheDop in
for,
significant,
highly
David
of
Life
and
brought
1818) the to trope is
bear
upon of (reprinted the
some
His
Soul” Wilson” (1891).
“William
Poe’s
in
double
Gothic
of
Muschett
Nicol
of
Stevenson
Dr.
in the
Confession arid
Jekyll Mr. The Hyde also as Being
given Earnest (1895) and
“The and
fisherman inflection
particular
The
(1842).
psychological
of accounts iporary
193 DOUBLES DOUBLES r 194 DOUBLES DOUBLES nineteenth century variously came to postulate exits the realm of art and becomes one of the workings of replication and multiplication — it Hogg, James; Lewis, Matthew; Radclif] the existence of a dark, unknown self that dominant tropes oftwentieth-century psychol also bears with it the ghastly potential to serve Romanticism; Shelley, Mary Wollstoneci lurked at the margins of rationality. Franz Mes pgy. With its topographical discovery of the as the harbinger of mortality: “originally venson, Robert Louis; mer’s theory of animal magnetism had probed unconscious, Freudian psychoanalysis drew Walpole, Horace. created as a wish-defense against a dreaded’ beyond the limits of consciousness in suggest upon, and consolidated, the figuring ofpsycho external destruction, he reappears in supersti ing that human behavior was governed by a logical duplicity in the work of his nineteenth- REFERENCES tion as the messenger of death” (Rank 1971: complex and involuntary flow of psychic and century literary and scientific forebears; 86). Freud would draw extensively upon Rank’s Alter, R. (1986) Playing host to the dopp corporeal energies; G. H. Schubert’s popular post-Freudian reworkings of classical psycho account of the contradictory significations of Times Literary Supplement (October 24), ization of Mesmer’s theories, together with his analysis in the work of Carl Jung and Jacques Bruhm, the double in his essay “The Uncanny” of 1919: S. (2001) Reflecting Narcissus: A Qi notion of the “shadow self,” was extremely Lacan replicated Freud’s doubling of the con thetic. Minneapolis, while reiterating the oscillation between nar MN: University of M influential among German writers of the Ro scious and unconscious mind with the self and Press. cissism and death, the double, as epitomized mantic period (see GERMAN GoTHIc). The the “shadow self,” the subject and his or her Rank, 0. (1971) The Dollble:A Psychoanaly for Freud in the fiction of Hoffmann, is a prime nineteenth-century science of hypnotism, itself mirrored ego respectively. R. D. Laing would (trans. and ed. H. Tucker, Jr.). Chapel F agent of uncanniness, a particularly disturbing University of North Carolina Press. the offspring of the work of Mesmer and lend further psychological import to the double compound of the (0 forces of familiarity and published in German 1925.) Schubert, did much to formalize the existence in his account of human psychopathology in strangeness, self and other; consequently, the Rogers, R. (1970) A Psychoanalytic Studj of a second self existing, in secret, at the limits The Divided Selfin 1960. Freudian uncanny has served as the primary Double in Literature. Detroit, of conscious identity. As Andrew Webber has Given its centrality to psychoanalysis, it is MI: Wayi I. theoretical lens for reading doubles in fiction, University Press. pointed out, the literary double, particularly in perhaps unsurprising to note that the double particularly in Gothic fictions of the nine Sage, V. (1988) Horror Fiction in the Protestar German literature of the nineteenth century, has itself become the object of much psycho teenth and twentieth centuries. tion. New York: St. Martin’s Press. invariably had its nonliterary scientific and analytic attention in literary and cultural criti Though not without the psychoanalytic Shelley, M. (1992 [1818, 18311) Frankenstein philosophical underpinnings: Kant’s philo cism ofthe twentieth and twenty-first centuries; Modern Prometheus leanings of earlier studies, Ralph Tymms’ (ed. M. Hindle). I sophical doublings were given fictional treat indeed, the movement of the double from lit Penguin. Doubles in Literary Psychology (1949) was a par ment in the work of Kleist; Fichte’s theories erature into psychology from the late nine Tymms, R. (1949) Doubles in Literary Psy ticularly exhaustive account of doubles in lit Cambridge, UK: Bowes & were fictionally explored by Jean Paul; and teenth century onwards has been followed by erature well beyond the Bowes. well-known examples Walker King, D. (2000) Body G. H. Schubert’s account of duality given liter a shift toward a self-reflexive enquiry as to how in the Palitics and German Romantic canon. In addition to tional Double. ary form in the work of E. T. A. Hoffmann the double, whatever its cultural form, might Bloomington, IN: Indiana 1 their reappearance in the postmodern fictional sity Press. (Webber 1996). As Victor Sage has argued, the be read, conceptualized, and interpreted. Otto and filmic reworkings of earlier Gothic texts, Webber, A. J. (1996) The Doppelganger: double in nineteenth-century British Gothic Rank’s psychoanalytic study of doubling, ini doubles also feature strongly within the theo Visions in German Literature. literature is inseparable from the theological tially in Der Doppelganger in 1914 and ampli retical endeavors of contemporary culture, not Clarendon. pursuits of Protestantism in both its Anglican fied in a more extensive study of 1925, was only in Jacques Derrida’s notion of “double- and Dissenting forms: notions of the internal crucial in this respect: for Rank, the double writing,” but also in Steven Bruhm’s queering of FURTHER ized conscience inscribed within the Protestant was as much literary as it was anthropological READING narcissism in Reflecting Narcissus: A Queer Aes subject a secret, internal self (Sage, 1988). and psychological. Citing many of the well- Daffron, B. E. (2002) thetic (2001) and in the Anglo-American femi Romantic Doubles: S Indeed, philosophical and scientific accounts known fictional treatments of doubles men Sympathy in British Gothic Literature, 179( nism ofDebra Walker King in Body Politics and of the fundamental duality of the human tioned above, Rank’s study proceeds to discuss New York: AMS Press. the Fictional Double (2000). In these and other spirit proliferated throughout the nineteenth the sociological antecedents of doubling, as Dryden, L. (2003) The Modern Cothic and 1 writers, the double has become the site ofpoliti century, figuring most prominently in the well as its implications for conceptualizing the Doubles: Stevenson, Wilde and Wells. Basin cal struggle. Even so, the double’s Gothic poten Palgrave. work of Thomas Carlyle, Friedrich Schlegel, relationship between authors and their texts: tial continues to be exploited by contemporary Herdman, J. (1990) The Double Max Dessoir, and Frederic Myers. In almost ever since Freud, classical psychoanalysis has in Nine, writers of fiction, with the trope, restored to its Century Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan. all instances, doubles in nineteenth-century tended to perceive the literary work as the horrific and terrific effects, figuring promi Hock Soon Ng, A. (ed.) (2008) The Poc Gothic fiction are cultural responses to a sense dark, repressed double of the authorial psyche. nently in such texts as Stephen King’s The Dark Shadows: The Double in Literature and Phdc of the human subject in crisis. Discursively, in What becomes particularly important in Rank’s Half (1989), Chuck Palahniuk’s Fight Club Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag. fact, the foundations ofwhat, following the rise account is the range of contradictory meanings Miller, K. (1985) (1996), Carlos Ruiz Zafon’s The Shadow of the Doubles: Studies in LiteraryL of psychoanalysis, would become known as the between which most manifestations of the Oxford: Oxford University Wind (2004), and Audrey Niffenegger’s Her Press. Miyoshi, M. (1969) unconscious had been in place since at least the double are said to shuttle: though often con Feaful Symmetry (2009). The Divided Self A Pers final decades of the eighteenth century; conse structed according to the impulses of primary on the Literature ofthe Victarians. New Yorl York University Press. — double seems to quently, with Freud, the double, while never narcissism by this logic, the SEE ALSO: German Gothic; Godwin, William; Royle, N. (2003) The Uncanny: An Introth losing its literary and artistic manifestations, secure the persistence of the self through the Hoffinann, E. T. A. (Ernst Theodor Amadeus); Manchester: Manchester University Press.
L
A. Hoffmann,
T. E. (Ernst
Amadeus); Theodor
Manchester: the University Manchester
Press.
through self of the
the persistence
secure
manifestations,
artistic
and
te
rary
SEE
ALSO:
German
Gothic;
N. Royle, William; Godwin,
(2003) The An
Uncanny:
Introduction. to
seems
double the
logic,
this by
narcissism — never while double, the
Freud,
th
York
University Press.
primary
of
impulses
the
to
according
structed
conse century;
eighteenth the
of
s
on
of tiue Literature
the
Victorians. New New York:
Fearful
Symmetry (2009).
con
often
though
shuttle:
to
said
are
double
the
least at
since
place
in been
s had
M.
(1969) Miyoshi, The
Self
A Divided Perspective
Wind
(2004), and
Audrey
Her Niffenegger’s
r
the
of
manifestations
most
which
‘between
the
as
known become
would Oxford:
talysis, Oxford University
Press.
(1996),
Carlos
Ruiz of The
the Zafón’s Shadow
meanings
contradictory of range
the is
account
rise
the following (1985) K. Miller, what, of Doubles: in Studies
Literary History.
Lndations
Half
(1989),
Chuck
Palahniuk’s
Fight
Club
Rank’s
in
important
particularly
becomes
What
in
Stuttgart: Discursively, Ibidem-Verlag.
crisis. in
subject
an
nently
such in
as texts
Stephen
The Dark King’s
psyche.
authorial
the
of
double
repressed
dark,
The in Double Shadows:
sense a and Literature to Philosophy.
responses
cultural
are
on
horrific
and
terrific effects,
figuring promi
the
as
work
literary the
Ng, Soon Hock perceive A. to ted.) The tended
(2008)
of Poetics
nineteenth-century in doubles
s,
writers
of the trope, with
fiction, to restored
its
has
psychoanalysis
Century fiction.
classical Basingstoke:
Macmillan. Freud,
since
ever
almost In
Myers.
Frederic
and
ir,
tial
be to continues
by
exploited
contemporary
J.
texts:
their 1-Ierdman, and The (1990) Double in
authors Nineteenth-
between
relationship
Schlegel,
Friedrich
Carlyle,
homas
cal
struggle.
so, Even the
double’s Gothic poten
the
Palgrave.
conceptualizing for
implications its
as
well
the in
prominently
most
guring
writers,
the double politi has the
of become site
Doubles:
Wilde and Stevenson, Wells. Basingstoke:
as
doubling, of
antecedents
sociological the
nineteenth
the
throughout
ferated
the L. Dryden,
The (2003) Double Fictional Modern In Gothic
(2000). and these
and
Literary other
discuss
to proceeds
study
Rank’s
above,
tioned
human
the of
duality
sdamental
New
York:
AIvIS Press. nism of
Debra
Walker King in Body and Politics
men
doubles
of
treatments
fictional
known
accounts
scientific
and
ilosophical
in Sympathy Gothic British Literature,
1790—1830.
thetic
and (2001)
the in
Anglo-American femi
well-
the
of
many
Citing
psychological. and
1988).
(Sage, self internal
E. B.
Daffron, secret,
(2002)
Romantic
Sex Doubles:
and
in
narcissism
Reflecting A
Narcissus:
Aes Queer
anthropological
was
as
it literary
as much
was
Protestant
the
within
inscribed
ence
writing,” in also but
Steven
Bruhm’s of queering
FURTHER
double READING the Rank,
for
hsrespect: this
in
crucial
internal
the
of
notions
forms:
ting
only
in
Jacques
of Derrida’s notion
“double-
was 1925, of study
extensive
more in a
fied
Anglican its both in
Protestantism
retical
of
endeavors
culture, contemporary not
ampli
and
1914 in
Doppelganger
Der in
tially Clarendon.
theological the
from
inseparable
5
doubles
also feature strongly
the within theo
ini
of doubling,
study
in Visions
German psychoanalytic Literature.
Rank’s Oxford:
Gothic British
nineteenth-century
and
filmic
of reworkings earlier
Gothic
texts,
J.
Otto
A.
interpreted. Webber, and
(1996) The
Doppelganger Double conceptualized,
read, be
the
argued,
has
Sage
Victor
As 996).
their
in the
reappearance
postmodern fictional
sity
Press. might
form,
cultural its
whatever
double,
the
Hoffmann A.
T.
E.
of
work
the
in
in
the
German
canon. Romantic In to
addition
tional Double.
IN: Bloomington, Indiana
how
Univer to as
enquiry
a
self-reflexive
toward
a shift
liter-
given
duality of
account
tbert’s
erature
well
D. Walker the King,
beyond (2000)
Politics Body well-known and examples the Fic
by
followed
been has
onwards century
teenth
and Paul;
Jean by
explored
nal1y
Cambridge,
& Bowes ticularly UK:
Bowes.
exhaustive of
account lit in doubles
nine late the
from
psychology
into
erature
theories
Fichte’s
Kleist; of
work
he
Tymms,
R.
(1949) in
Doubles
Literary Psychology.
Doubles in
Literary Psychology (1949)
a was par
lit
from
double
the of
movement the
indeed,
treat-
fictional given
were
[oublings
Penguin.
leanings
of
studies, earlier
Ralph Tymms’
centuries;
twenty-first and
twentieth the of cism
philo
Kant’s
underpinnings: Modern
ted. ical Prometheus M. Hindle).
London:
Though not the without
psychoanalytic
criti
cultural and literary
in
attention
analytic
and
scientific
M. Shelley,
1831)) [1818, (1992 nonliterary
its Or, the Frankenstein:
had
teenth
and
twentieth
centuries.
psycho
much of
object
the
become
itself has
tion.
New century, St.
York:
Martin’s
Press. nineteenth
the
of
iterature
particularly
in
Gothic the of fictions
nine
double
the
that
note
to
unsurprising
perhaps
Sage, V.
Horror
(1988) in fiction
in the
Tradi Protestant particularly
double,
literary the
at,
theoretical
lens for
reading in doubles fiction,
is it
psychoanalysis,
to
centrality
its Press. University Given
J.
has
Webber
Andrew As identity.
us
Freudian
as has uncanny served
the
primary
in
Double
Literature. Detroit, 1960.
in
MI: Self Wayne State
Divided
The
limits
the at secret, in
existing,
self
d
strangeness,
and
self
other;
consequently, the
in
R.
Rogers, A (1970) of
Study psychopathology
Psychoanalytic the human of
account his
in
existence
the
to formalize
much
did
compound
the of
of forces familiarity and
in
published
1925.)
German double
the to
import
psychological
further
lend
and
Mesmer of
work the
of
ring
agent of uncanniness, a of University
North
disturbing particularly
Carolina Press.
(Originally
would
Laing
D. R.
respectively. ego
mirrored
itself
hypnotism, of
science
h-century
(trans.
H. ed. and for
Tucker, Freud Jr.). the in
of fiction
Hill, Chapel a NC: is Hoffmann,
prime her
or his
and
subject
the
self,”
“shadow
the
The
GoTHIc).
GERMAN
(see
eriod
0.
Rank, (1971)
The
Double:A
Psychoanalytic Study cissism
and
death,
the as double,
epitomized
and
self the
with
mind
unconscious and
scious
Ro
the
of
writers
German
among
I
Press.
while
reiterating
the oscillation
nar between
con
the of
doubling
Freud’s
replicated
Lacan
extremely was
self,”
thetic. the
Minneapolis,
f MN:
of University
Minnesota
ccshadow
the
in
double
his essay
Uncanny” “The of 1919:
Jacques
and
Jung
Carl of work
the
in
analysis
his
with
together S. Bruhm,
(2001) theories, A Reflecting Aes
Queer
Narcissus:
Mesmer’s
account
of the
contradictory of
significations
psycho
classical of
reworldngs
post-freudian
Times
popular
Literary Supplement 24), Schubert’s (October H. 1190. G.
energies;
86).
freud
draw
would
extensively
Rank’s upon
forebears;
scientific
and
literary
century
R.
Alter,
(1986)
and host
the to Playing
of doppelganger. psychic flow
involuntary
and
tion
as the
of messenger
death”
1971: (Rank
nineteenth-
his of
work the
in
duplicity
logical a
by
governed was
behavior
human
REFERENCES external
he destruction, in reappears supersti
psycho of
figuring
the consolidated,
and
upon,
in suggest-
consciousness of
limits ie
created as
a
against a wish-defense
dreaded
drew
psychoanalysis
Freudian
unconscious,
probed
had
magnetism
animal
of
ory
as
the
of harbinger mortality:
“originally
the venson,
Robert
of Louis; Walpole,
Horace.
discovery
topographical its
With ogy.
Mes
Franz
rationality.
of
margins
the
also
bears it with
the
ghastly to
potential serve
Romanticism; psychol Shelley, Mary Ste
Wollstonecraft;
twentieth-century of
tropes
dominant
that self
unknown
dark, a
of
ence
workings
of and
replication it multiplication
Hogg, the
James; of Lewis,
one
Matthew;
Ann; Radcliffe, —
becomes
and
art of realm
the
exits
postulate to came variously century th
195 DOUBLES OUBLES