DOCSLIB.ORG

Senate the Senate Met at 10 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Senate the Senate Met at 10 A.M E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2007 No. 4 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable ROBERT P. CASEY, Jr., speak for the times specified: Senator called to order by the Honorable ROB- a Senator from the State of Pennsylvania, to TESTER, 10 minutes; Senator NELSON of ERT P. CASEY, Jr., a Senator from the perform the duties of the Chair. Florida, 15 minutes; Senator SALAZAR, State of Pennsylvania. ROBERT C. BYRD, 15 minutes; and that when the Senate President pro tempore. reconvenes at 2:15, debate time be ex- PRAYER Mr. CASEY thereupon assumed the tended for another 30 minutes, with The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. Senators LIEBERMAN and COLLINS rec- fered the following prayer: f ognized for 15 minutes each; that fol- Let us pray. lowing that time, the majority leader Divine Master, You are our strong- RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER be recognized to offer a substitute hold and the pioneer of our future. amendment. Teach us to work with greater faithful- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- ness. May pleasing You become our pri- pore. The majority leader is recog- pore. Is there objection? mary focus as You place a song in our nized. Without objection, it is so ordered. heart for each burden on our shoulders. f Mr. REID. Mr. President, let me be Guide our lawmakers today. Lead very clear that if a Republican Member them to Your fortress of love, patience, SCHEDULE is available and desires to speak, they and kindness. Remind them that any Mr. REID. Mr. President, this morn- would follow a Democratic speaker. We success alien to Your way is worse than ing, the Senate will be in a period of would alternate that. These times only failure and that any failure in Your morning business until 11 a.m. The mi- list Democrats, but if there is a Repub- Spirit is better than gold. Let Your nority will control the first half and lican, we will insert them between the benediction rest upon our Senators, the majority will control the second two, if they want to speak. and may they bring their stewardship half. Under a previous order, the Sen- f in line with the destiny You desire for ate will begin consideration of the eth- their lives. Make them channels of ics legislation at 11 a.m., for debate RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY Your grace and coworkers in the build- only, until the Senate goes into recess LEADER ing of Your kingdom. for its normal weekly party conference We pray in Your wonderful Name. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- luncheons. Amen. pore. The Republican leader is recog- The managers of the bill will be here nized. f at 11 a.m., and they will be making f PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE their opening statements, if appro- SENATOR ALBEN BARKLEY The Honorable ROBERT P. CASEY, Jr., priate, as well as a number of other led the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: Members who have expressed an inter- Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, a I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the est in speaking this morning. When the few months prior to this body’s con- United States of America, and to the Repub- Senate returns after the party lunch- vening last week, I was honored and lic for which it stands, one nation under God, eons, the substitute amendment will be humbled when my colleagues elected indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. laid down. So Members should be ready me to serve as the Republican leader in f to review this amendment and prepare the 110th Congress. their amendments accordingly. APPOINTMENT OF ACTING I am thankful for the trust my I am working with the distinguished PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE friends have placed in me, and I won’t Republican leader to see if we can offer break that trust. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The something together—I am hopeful and At such a time as this, and in such an clerk will please read a communication very confident we can—as a substitute historic Chamber, my thoughts turn to the Senate from the President pro amendment. toward great Kentuckians of the past tempore (Mr. BYRD). who have left their indelible mark on The assistant legislative clerk read f this body. the following letter: ORDER OF PROCEDURE Henry Clay served as Speaker of the U.S. SENATE, Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unan- House, Senator, and Secretary of PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, imous consent that following the open- State, despite losing three Presidential Washington, DC, January 9, 2007. To the Senate: ing statements of Senators FEINSTEIN campaigns. Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, and BENNETT with respect to S. 1, the John Sherman Cooper served as the of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby following Senators be recognized to conscience of the Senate, and I have ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S243 . VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:25 Mar 13, 2014 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\2007SENATE\S09JA7.REC S09JA7 mmaher on DSKCGSP4G1 with SOCIALSECURITY S244 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 9, 2007 spoken on this floor before of the admi- storyteller. Many can recall Senator On his first day in the top post, ration and respect I will always have Barkley’s saying: ‘‘A good story is like Democratic Senators ignored his plea for the Senator who mentored me in fine Kentucky bourbon . it improves not to override a Presidential veto, my first job on Capitol Hill. with age and, if you don’t use it too putting Barkley on the losing side of a But there is another famous Ken- much, it will never hurt anyone.’’ 71 to 19 vote. The bill had originally tuckian who once dominated these By 1933, Barkley was selected as an been sponsored by Barkley himself, Senate hallways who we should not for- assistant to Senate Majority Leader putting the leader in the humiliating get. Joe Robinson of Arkansas. In 1937, Rob- position of losing a vote to sustain a He was a key lawmaker during World inson died, clearing the way for veto of his own bill. War II, and close friend to Presidents— Barkley’s election as leader—but the Over the next few years, Barkley’s a passionate orator, champion of the manner of Barkley’s election to the top troubles mounted, actually, as he kept New Deal, and popular teller of tall spot would serve today as an object les- finding himself on the losing end of tales. After his Senate service, he made son to Senators of how not to get the votes. Senators cruelly reminded him famous the nickname ‘‘the Veep.’’ job, and it hampered Barkley’s effec- of how he had climbed to the top spot That man is Alben Barkley, the last, tiveness as leader for several years by mockingly referring to him as and until now, the only Senator from thereafter. ‘‘Dear Alben.’’ Kentucky to be elected his party’s When the 75th Congress began, the Even worse, Washington journalists, leader. Democrats held a whopping 76 seats in seeing the leader unable to move his Senator Barkley served as majority the Senate, leaving only 16 Republicans colleagues, dubbed him ‘‘Bumbling leader for 10 years, from 1937 to 1947, and four Independents. Their majority Barkley,’’ and the name stuck. In March 1939, Life magazine pub- longer than anyone else before him. was so large that freshmen Democrats lished a poll of Washington journalists From 1947 to 1949 he served as minority had desks over here on the Republican rating the 10 ‘‘most able’’ Senators. leader, and in 1948 he was elected Vice side of the Chamber in the back. Senators in those days referred to Barkley’s one-time rival Pat Harrison President to President Truman. ranked fifth. The Senate majority lead- But some of my colleagues may not the lone outpost of Democrats over here on the Republican side in the back er did not make the list. know that Senator Barkley almost be- Despite setbacks, Senator Barkley came the first President of the United as the ‘‘Cherokee Strip’’ because those unlucky Members were off the reserva- plunged ahead to lead the Senate and States from Kentucky since Abraham to champion President Roosevelt’s New Lincoln. He lost that opportunity by tion. But the Democratic Party was badly Deal. His colleagues began to melt taking a courageous stand to put the under his considerable personal charm. Senate, the Senators he led, and prin- split in two. Half the caucus supported Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal poli- In contrast with Robinson’s heavy- ciple ahead of political ambition. cies, and the other half frequently un- handed leadership style, Barkley often Like Lincoln, Alben Barkley was sat down with a colleague, disarmed born in a log cabin, literally, on his fa- dermined them. In the leader’s race, the first group him with humor or a funny story, and ther’s tobacco farm in Graves County, lined up behind Barkley, and the latter then made his case. KY, in 1877. The Barkley family was behind Senator Pat Harrison of Mis- Barkley led from the podium at his not a family of means, and Alben grew sissippi. Each Senator had pledges of desk, speaking persuasively and knowl- up chopping wood, harvesting tobacco, support from enough Senators to win, edgeably on any and every bill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Party Leaders in the United States Congress, 1789-2019
    Party Leaders in the United States Congress, 1789-2019 Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process Updated September 4, 2019 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL30567 Party Leaders in the United States Congress, 1789-2019 Summary This report briefly describes current responsibilities and selection mechanisms for 15 House and Senate party leadership posts and provides tables with historical data, including service dates, party affiliation, and other information for each. Tables have been updated as of the report’s issuance date to reflect leadership changes. Although party divisions appeared almost from the First Congress, the formally structured party leadership organizations now taken for granted are a relatively modern development. Constitutionally specified leaders, namely the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate, can be identified since the First Congress. Other leadership posts, however, were not formally recognized until about the middle of the 19th century, and some are 20th-century creations. In the earliest Congresses, those House Members who took some role in leading their parties were often designated by the President as his spokesperson in the chamber. By the early 1800s, an informal system developed when the Speaker began naming his lieutenant to chair one of the most influential House committees. Eventually, other Members wielded significant influence via other committee posts (e.g., the post-1880 Committee on Rules). By the end of the 19th century, the formal position of floor leaders had been established in the House. The Senate was slower than the House to develop formal party leadership positions, and there are similar problems in identifying individual early leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest Group Branding and the Private Donation Habits of Lobbyists Darrell Ian Pacheco Dickinson College
    Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Student Honors Theses By Year Student Honors Theses 5-20-2012 Interest Group Branding and the Private Donation Habits of Lobbyists Darrell Ian Pacheco Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.dickinson.edu/student_honors Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Pacheco, Darrell Ian, "Interest Group Branding and the Private Donation Habits of Lobbyists" (2012). Dickinson College Honors Theses. Paper 40. This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Interest Group Branding and the Private Donation Habits of Lobbyists by Darrell Ian Pacheco Submitted in partial fulfillment of Honors Requirements for the Department of Political Science Dr. Todd Makse, Supervisor Dr. Vanessa Tyson, Reader May 18, 2012 Abstract: Recent studies have looked at the private donating behavior of lobbyists to better understand the level of partisanship in the interest group environment, finding that individual lobbyists and the firms they work for are increasingly polarized along party lines. In this study, I examine whether the identity characteristics of the interest groups for whom they lobby affects the private behavior of lobbyists. In particular, I adopt Heaney's (2004) typology of interest group branding strategies, and find that the interest groups for whom lobbyists work impacts their private donating behavior. Enshrined in our constitution is the chief principle of freedom in any country, the freedom of speech, and its corollary, the right to petition our government. There are thousands of registered lobbyists in Washington, many of whom have particular specializations, waiting to assist individuals and groups wanting to exercise their right to petition.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Dissertation
    The Business of America is Lobbying: The Expansion of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralism by Lee Jared Drutman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Henry E. Brady, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor David Vogel Professor Neil Fligstein Fall 2010 The Business of America is Lobbying: The Expansion of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralism Copyright 2010 by Lee Jared Drutman Abstract The Business of America is Lobbying: The Expansion of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralism by Lee Jared Drutman Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Henry E. Brady, Chair Why does corporate lobbying in Washington, DC continue to expand, year after year? What are companies lobbying for, and why? And what, if anything, can the patterns of activity tell us about both the impact corporate lobbying is having and the ways in which the political economy of the United States is changing? I argue that the modern growth of corporate lobbying reflects a path-dependent learning process. Companies may come to Washington for many different reasons, but the act of establishing an office sets in motion several reinforcing processes that make companies value lobbying more and more over time and that lead companies to become more proactive in their political strategies. Lobbyists teach managers about the importance of being politically active and help to point out (and sometimes even create) new opportunities for lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • A Matter of Trust HOW the REVOLVING DOOR UNDERMINES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in GOVERNMENT— and WHAT to DO ABOUT IT
    A Matter of Trust HOW THE REVOLVING DOOR UNDERMINES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNMENT— AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT Revolving Door Working Group October 2005 www.revolvingdoor.info The full text of this report is available online at www.revolvingdoor.info A Matter of Trust HOW THE REVOLVING DOOR UNDERMINES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNMENT—AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT Revolving Door Working Group October 2005 The report as a whole is copyighted ©2005 by the Revolving Door Working Group. The authors retain individual or joint copyright ©2005 on their respective sections. www.revolvingdoor.info “The aim of every political Constitution is or ought to be first to obtain for rulers, men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous, whilst they continue to hold their public trust.” — James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 57 This report was designed by Tim Hill, psycosm.com Table of Contents About the Revolving Door Working Group . 6 Executive Summary . 7 Introduction: The Revolving Door and Industry Influence on Public Policy . 10 Chapter 1: The Industry-to-Government Revolving Door . 14 How the appointment of industry veterans to key posts in federal agencies tends to create a pro-business bias in policy formulation and regulatory enforcement Chapter 2: The Government-to-Industry Revolving Door . 26 How the movement of public officials into lucrative private sector roles can compromise government procurement, regulatory policy and the public interest. Chapter 3: The Government-to-Lobbyist Revolving Door .
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Overspeech
    ARTICLES CONGRESSIONAL OVERSPEECH Josh Chafetz* Political theater. Spectacle. Circus. Reality show. We are constantly told that, whatever good congressional oversight is, it certainly is not those things. Observers and participants across the ideological and partisan spectrums use those descriptions as pejorative attempts to delegitimize oversight conducted by their political opponents or as cautions to their own allies of what is to be avoided. Real oversight, on this consensus view, is about fact-finding, not about performing for an audience. As a result, when oversight is done right, it is both civil and consensus-building. While plenty of oversight activity does indeed involve bipartisan attempts to collect information and use that information to craft policy, this Article seeks to excavate and theorize a different way of using oversight tools, a way that focuses primarily on their use as a mechanism of public communication. I refer to such uses as congressional overspeech. After briefly describing the authority, tools and methods, and consensus understanding of oversight in Part I, this Article turns to an analysis of overspeech in Part II. The three central features of overspeech are its communicativity, its performativity, and its divisiveness, and each of these is analyzed in some detail. Finally, Part III offers two detailed case studies of overspeech: the Senate Munitions Inquiry of the mid-1930s and the McCarthy and Army-McCarthy Hearings of the early 1950s. These case studies not only demonstrate the dynamics of overspeech in action but also illustrate that overspeech is both continuous across and adaptive to different media environments. Moreover, the case studies illustrate that overspeech can be used in the service of normatively good, normatively bad, and * Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 10 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2007 No. 4 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable ROBERT P. CASEY, Jr., speak for the times specified: Senator called to order by the Honorable ROB- a Senator from the State of Pennsylvania, to TESTER, 10 minutes; Senator NELSON of ERT P. CASEY, Jr., a Senator from the perform the duties of the Chair. Florida, 15 minutes; Senator SALAZAR, State of Pennsylvania. ROBERT C. BYRD, 15 minutes; and that when the Senate President pro tempore. reconvenes at 2:15, debate time be ex- PRAYER Mr. CASEY thereupon assumed the tended for another 30 minutes, with The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. Senators LIEBERMAN and COLLINS rec- fered the following prayer: f ognized for 15 minutes each; that fol- Let us pray. lowing that time, the majority leader Divine Master, You are our strong- RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER be recognized to offer a substitute hold and the pioneer of our future. amendment. Teach us to work with greater faithful- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- ness. May pleasing You become our pri- pore. The majority leader is recog- pore. Is there objection? mary focus as You place a song in our nized. Without objection, it is so ordered. heart for each burden on our shoulders. f Mr. REID. Mr. President, let me be Guide our lawmakers today.
    [Show full text]
  • National Press Club Luncheon Address by Representative Nancy Pelosi(D-Ca), House Minority Leader, and Senator Richard Durbin (D- Il), Senate Minority Whip
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON ADDRESS BY REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI(D-CA), HOUSE MINORITY LEADER, AND SENATOR RICHARD DURBIN (D- IL), SENATE MINORITY WHIP TOPIC: THE STATE OF THE UNION MODERATOR: JONATHAN SALANT, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LOCATION: THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M. EST DATE: THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2006 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. SALANT: (Strikes gavel.) Good afternoon. Welcome to the National Press Club. I'm Jonathan Salant, a reporter for Bloomberg News and president of the National Press Club. I'd like to welcome club members and those of you -- and the guests in the audience, and those of you watching today on C-SPAN. Please hold your applause during the speech, so we have time for as many questions as possible. For our broadcast, audience, I'd like to explain if you do hear applause, it is from the guests and members of the general public who attend our luncheons, not from the working press.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead
    Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead Congress Watch January 2006 Acknowledgements Congress Watch Research and Investigations Director Taylor Lincoln and Congress Watch Researcher Conor Kenny were the primary authors of Rep. Roy Blunt: Ties to Special Interests Leave Him Unfit to Lead. Congress Watch Director Frank Clemente provided significant editorial guidance. Congress Watch Legislative Assistant Beth O’Brien and Congress Watch intern Eddie Thomas Jr. provided extensive research assistance. Congress Watch Civil Justice Research Director Chris Schmidt served as an editor on the project. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a 150,000 member non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, research and public education. Founded in 1971, Public Citizen fights for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has six divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies and the media. Congress Watch is one of the five divisions. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org ©2006 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 2 Rep. Roy Blunt: Unfit to Lead Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Target San Diego
    Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government Lee Cokorinos Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government A Report for the Center on Policy Initiatives Lee Cokorinos November 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgments . ii Foreword . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction: The National Significance of the Battle for San Diego . 1 1. The National Context: Key Organizations Leading the Right’s Assault on the States and Cities . 5 A. The American Legislative Exchange Council . 7 B. The State Policy Network . 13 C. The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy . 17 D. The Pacific Research Institute . 21 E. Americans for Tax Reform and the Project for California’s Future . 25 F. The Reason Foundation . 33 2. The Performance Institute and the Assault on San Diego . 39 3. The Battle for America’s Cities: A National Engagement . 49 Endnotes . 57 I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments This report was made possible through the generous support of the New World Foundation. Special thanks go to Colin Greer and Ann Bastian of New World for their leadership in fostering the movement for progressive renewal. Thanks also to Donald Cohen of the Center on Policy Initiatives for contributing keen insights and the benefit of his ground level experience at engaging the right at every step of the research and writing, to Murtaza Baxamusa of CPI for sharing his expertise, and to veteran political researcher Jerry Sloan for his valuable advice. Jerry’s decades of research on the California and the national right have educated a generation of activists.
    [Show full text]