Seismic Risk: The Biases of Earthquake Media Coverage Maud H. Devès1,2*, Marion Le Texier3, Hugues Pécout4 and Claude Grasland4,5 1 Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS UMR 7154, 75238 Paris Cedex 5, France – Université de Paris. 2 Université Paris-Diderot, Centre de Recherche Psychanalyse Médecine et Société, CNRS EA 3522 – Université de Paris. 3 Université de Rouen Normandie – UMR CNRS 6266 IDEES, 76781 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France. 4 CNRS, FR 2007 Collège international des sciences territoriales – Université de Paris. 5 Université Paris-Diderot, UMR 8504 Géographie-Cités & FR 2007 CIST, 75006 Paris, France – Université de Paris. *Corresponding author: Maud H. Devès (
[email protected]) Abstract The capacity of individuals to cope with threatening situations depends directly on their capacity to anticipate what will come next. The Media should play a key role in that respect, but an extensive analysis of earthquake Media coverage by the international news reveals systeMatic biases. Exploring a corpus of 320 888 news articles published by 32 worldwide newspapers in 2015 in English, Spanish or French, we found that the press covers a very sMall number of events: 71% of the news about seisMic events was dedicated to only 3 earthquakes (aMong the 1559 of Magnitude 5+). A combination of frequency and content analysis reveals a typical fraMing of the ‘earthquake news’. Except for the ‘Nepal quake’, the duration of the coverage is usually very short. The news thus tends to focus on short-term issues: the event Magnitude, tsunaMi alerts, human losses, Material daMage, and rescue operations. Longer-term issues linked to the recovery, restoration, reconstruction, Mitigation and prevention are barely addressed.