DOCSLIB.ORG

Kandinsky: Russian and Bauhaus Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

KANDINSKY: RUSSIAN AND BAUHAUS YEARS KANDINSKY: RUSSIAN AND BAUHAUS YEARS 1915-1933 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum Library and Archives http://www.archive.org/details/kandinskyrussianOOkand KANDINSKY: RUSSIAN AND BAUHAUS YEARS 1915-1933 The exhibition is supported by a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. The catalogue is partially underwritten by a grant from the Federal Republic of Germany. Additional support for the exhibition has been contributed by Lufthansa German Airlines. The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York Kandinsky Society Claude Pompidou, President Dominique Bozo, Vice-President Thomas M. Messer, Vice-President Christian Derouet, Secretary Edouard Balladur Karl Flinker Jean-Claude Groshens Pontus Hulten Jean Maheu Werner Schmalenbach Armin Zweite Hans K. Roethel The Members Guild of The High Museum of Art has sponsored the presentation in Atlanta. Published by The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1983 ISBN: 0-89107-044-7 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 83-50760 © The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1983 Cover: Kandinsky, In the Black Square. June 1923 (cat. no. 146) The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation HONORARY TRUSTEES IN PERPETUITY Solomon R. Guggenheim, Justin K. Thannhauser, Peggy Guggenheim president Peter O. Lawson-Johnston vice president The Right Honorable Earl Castle Stewart trustees Anne L. Armstrong, Elaine Dannheisser, Michel David-Weill, Joseph W. Donner, Robin Chandler Duke, Robert M. Gardiner, John Hilson, Harold W. McGraw, Jr., Wendy L-J. McNeil, Thomas M. Messer, Frank R. Milliken, Lewis T. Preston, Seymour Slive, Michael F. Wettach, William T. Ylvisaker advisory board Susan Morse Hilles, Morton L. Janklow, Barbara Jonas, Hannelore Schulhof, Bonnie Ward Simon, Stephen C. Swid secretary-treasurer Theodore G. Dunker staff Aili Pontynen, Assistant Secretary; Joy N. Fearon, Assistant Treasurer; Veronica M. O'Connell director Thomas M. Messer The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum deputy director Diane Waldman administrator William M. Jackson staff Vivian Endicott Barnett, Curator; Lisa Dennison, Susan B. Hirschfeld, Assistant Curators; Carol Fuerstein, Editor; Sonja Bay, Librarian; Ward Jackson, Archivist; Susan M. Taylor, Lewis Kachur, Curatorial Assistants; Shara Wasserman, Editorial Assistant Louise Averill Svendsen, Curator Emeritus Cherie A. Summers, Registrar; Jane Rubin, Associate Registrar; Guillermo Alonso, Assistant Registrar; Stephanie Stitt, Registrar's Coordinator; Saul Fuerstein, Preparator; William Smith, David M. Veater, Preparation Assistants; Leni Potoff, Associate Conservator; Elizabeth Estabrook, Conservation Coordinator; Scott A. Wixon, Operations Manager; Tony Moore, Assistant Operations Manager; Takayuki Amano, Head Carpenter; Carmelo Guadagno, Photographer; David M. Heald, Associate Photographer; Holly Fullam, Photography Coordinator Mimi Poser, Officer for Development and Public Affairs; Carolyn Porcelli, Ann Kraft, Development Associates; Richard Pierce, Public Affairs Associate; Elizabeth K. Lawson, Membership Associate; Deborah J. Greenberg, Public Affairs Coordinator; Linda Gering, Development Assistant; Catherine Kleinschmidt, Public Affairs Assistant; Veronica Herman, Membership Assistant Agnes R. Connolly, Auditor; Stefanie Levinson, Sales Manager; Robert Turner, Manager, Cafe and Catering; Maria Masciotti, Assistant Restaurant Manager; Katherine W. Briggs, Information; Christopher O'Rourke, Building Superintendent; Robert S. Flotz, Security Supervisor; Elbio Almiron, Marie Bradley, Assistant Security Supervisors I; John Carroll, Assistant Security Supervisor II Rebecca H. Wright, Jill Snyder, Administrative Assistants life members Eleanor, Countess Castle Stewart, Mr. and Mrs. Werner Dannheisser, William C. Edwards, Jr., Mr. and Mrs. Andrew P. Fuller, Mr. and Mrs. Peter O. Lawson-Johnston, Mrs. Samuel I. Rosenman, Mrs. S. H. Scheuer, Mrs. Evelyn Sharp, Mr. and Mrs. Stephen A. Simon, Sidney Singer, Jr., Mrs. Hilde Thannhauser institutional patrons Alcoa Foundation, Atlantic Richfield Foundation, Exxon Corporation, Robert Wood Johnson Jr. Charitable Trust, Mobil Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the Humanities, New York State Council on the Arts LENDERS TO THE EXHIBITION Edward Albee, New York Kunsthaus Zurich Stadtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus, Munich Herbert Bayer Kunstmuseum Basel Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam Bayerische Hypotheken- und Kupferstichkabinett, Kunstmuseum Basel Wechselbank, Munich Theatermuseum der Universitat Koln Kunstmuseum Bern George Costakis, Athens University Art Museum, University of Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Nathan Cummings, New York California, Berkeley Diisseldorf Van Abbemuseum, Eindhoven, Anneliese Itten, Zurich Long Beach Museum of Art, Long Beach, The Netherlands Lighting Associates, Inc., New York California Wilhelm-Hack-Museum, Ludwigshafen Mr. and Mrs. Adrien Maeght The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven New York Lucia Moholy Musee d'Art et d'Histoire, Centre Ulrich Pfander, Tegernsee d'Initiation a l'Art Moderne, Geneva The Robert Gore Rifkind Center for German Expressionist Studies, Gift of the Musee National d'Art Moderne, Centre Artcurial, Paris Robert Gore Rifkind Foundation, The Georges Pompidou, Paris Galerie Beyeler, Basel Los Angeles County Museum of Art Museum of Art, Rhode Island School of Galerie Gmurzynska, Cologne Professor K.P. Zygas, Los Angeles Design, Providence Leonard Hutton Galleries, New York Museum Boymans-van Beuningen, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Sidney Janis Gallery, New York Museum Ludwig, Cologne Art Advisory SA, c/o Matthiesen Fine Art Gallery, Buffalo, Albright-Knox Art Ltd., London New York The Museum of Modern Art, New York Graphisches Kabinett Kunsthandel Altonaer Museum, Hamburg Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas Wolfgang Werner KG, Bremen City, Missouri The Art Institute of Chicago Ohara Museum of Art, Kurashiki, Japan Bauhaus-Archiv, Berlin Busch-Reisinger Museum, Harvard Philadelphia Museum of Art University, Cambridge, Massachusetts The Hilla von Rebay Foundation Fort Worth Art Museum San Francisco Museum of Modern Art The Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice The Santa Barbara Museum of Art The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York Schlemmer Family Collection, Staatsgalerie Stuttgart Haags Gemeentemuseum, The Hague, The Netherlands Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution, Staatliche Museen Preussischer Washington, D.C. Kulturbestiz, Nationalgalerie, Berlin 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 Preface and Acknowledgements Thomas M. Messer iz Kandinsky: Russian and Bauhaus Years, 1915-1933 Clark V. Poling 13 Kandinsky in Russia, 1915-1921 36 Kandinsky at the Bauhaus in Weimar, 1922-1925 56 Kandinsky at the Bauhaus in Dessau and Berlin, 1925-193 85 Catalogue 348 Chronology 354 Selected Bibliography 357 Index of Artists in the Catalogue 358 Photographic Credits PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The name of Vasily Kandinsky, as lias been pointed out on previous occa- sions, is inextricably linked to the Guggenheim's history. More than that of any other artist, his work constitutes the core of the collection that Hilla Rebay assembled for her patron and for this institution, which was known as the Museum of Non-Objective Painting when it was created almost fifty years ago under the aegis of The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. It is therefore quite natural that Kandinsky should remain a recurrent subject of investigation for us, the more so because his art and his theories continue to have distinctly contemporary implications. Kandinsky: Russian and Bauhaus Years, 1915-1933 thus becomes the second installment in a three-part exhibition project. It follows Kandinsky in Munich, curated in 1982 by Dr. Peg Weiss, and precedes Kandinsky in Paris, now under study by Christian Derouet. As originally conceived, the three parts of the project call for the participation of different individuals steeped in their respective areas of specialization. Together the scholars so involved should shed new light upon Kandinsky's ultimately unified cre- ative achievement. The current exhibition and this accompanying catalogue were entrusted to Dr. Clark V. Poling, Director, Emory University Museum of Art and Archaeology, Atlanta, and Associate Professor of Art History, who has de- voted exhaustive research to the Bauhaus period and in particular to Kan- dinsky's theoretical and pedagogical contributions. The three parts of Dr. Poling's essay dealing respectively with Kandinsky in Russia, Weimar and Dessau are close studies of Kandinsky's art and simultaneously offer guide- lines for the presentation of the selected objects. As in the first exhibition, the selection transcends Kandinsky's own oeuvre in order to stress the broader context of his thought and work in relation to that of other artists. In acknowledging the Guggenheim's great satisfaction with what ap- pears to be a perfect implementation of the trilogy's second part, Dr. Poling's contribution must be mentioned first. In doing so, we are aware that he wishes to share credit with colleagues who have made generous contributions. We are grateful to Dr. Hans M. Wingler, Director of the Bauhaus-Archiv in Berlin, and his associates Dr. Peter Hahn and Dr. Christian Wolsdorff for sharing important materials with Dr. Poling and for making essential loans available for the exhibition. Without the generous support from
Recommended publications
  • A Legacy Regained: Niko and the Russian Avant-Garde

    A Legacy Regained: Niko and the Russian Avant-Garde

    A LEGACY REGAINED: NIKO AND THE RUSSIAN AVANT-GARDE PALACE EDITIONS Contents 8 Foreword Evgeniia Petrova 9 Preface Job de Ruiter 10 Acknowledgements and Notes to the Reader John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny 13 Introduction John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny Part I. Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Russian Avant Garde Remembering Nikolai Khardzhiev 21 Nikolai Khardzhiev RudolfDuganov 24 The Future is Now! lra Vrubel-Golubkina 36 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Suprematists Nina Suetina 43 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Maiakovsky Museum, Moscow Gennadii Aigi 50 My Memoir of Nikolai Khardzhiev Vyacheslav Ivanov 53 Nikolai Khardzhiev and My Family Zoya Ender-Masetti 57 My Meetings with Nikolai Khardzhiev Galina Demosfenova 59 Nikolai Khardzhiev, Knight of the Avant-garde Jean-C1aude Marcade 63 A Sole Encounter Szymon Bojko 65 The Guardian of the Temple Andrei Nakov 69 A Prophet in the Wilderness John E. Bowlt 71 The Great Commentator, or Notes About the Mole of History Vasilii Rakitin Writings by Nikolai Khardzhiev Essays 75 Autobiography 76 Poetry and Painting:The Early Maiakovsky 81 Cubo-Futurism 83 Maiakovsky as Partisan 92 Painting and Poetry Profiles ofArtists and Writers 99 Elena Guro 101 Boris Ender 103 In Memory of Natalia Goncharova and Mikhail Larionov 109 Vladimir Maiakovsky 122 Velimir Khlebnikov 131 Alexei Kruchenykh 135 VladimirTatlin 137 Alexander Rodchenko 139 EI Lissitzky Contents Texts Edited and Annotated by Nikolai Khardzhiev 147 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introductions to Kazimir Malevich's Autobiography (Parts 1 and 2) 157 Kazimir Malevieh Autobiography 172 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Mikhail Matiushin's The Russian Cubo-Futurists 173 Mikhail Matiushin The Russian Cubo-Futurists 183 Alexei Morgunov A Memoir 186 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Khlebnikov Is Everywhere! 187 Khlebnikov is Everywhere! Memoirs by Oavid Burliuk, Nadezhda Udaltsova, Amfian Reshetov, and on Osip Mandelshtam 190 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Lev Zhegin's Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin 192 Lev Zhegin Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin Part 11.
  • Painting the Absolute

    Painting the Absolute

    ANDRÉI NAKOV MALEVICH painting the absolute An iconic figure in the history of modern art, the Russian painter Kazimir Malevich (1879-1935) was the creator of Suprematism, best known for his emblematic Black Square (1915). Censored in Russia for many years, his revolutionary writings were only recognised at the end of the twentieth century, initially in Western Europe. Similarly, much of his work remained unknown until the fall of Communism; little studied, the life and work of this painter remain shrouded in an aura of mystery. Andréi Nakov’s monumental study of this prophetic artist is founded on many decades of research in Russia, Western Europe and the US. The author has uncovered many previously unknown documents, and sheds a new light on Malevich’s pivotal role in the development of modern art, offering a radically new interpretation of a • Andréi Nakov and Malevich’s daughter, Anna-Maria Uriman. fascinating artist. Andréi Nakov is the leading world expert on the work of Kazimir Malevich and the ‘The Essential 4-volume Reference Guide to Melevich’s Complete Oeuvre’ Russian avant garde. He is the author of the Malevich catalogue raisonné (2002), an extensive critical anthology of the writings of Malevich (1975), and L’Avant-garde • The most detailed and comprehensive analysis of Malevich’s complete œuvre available Russe (1984). Kazimir Malevich: Le Peintre Absolu (the French edition of the present • Based on over 30 years of research in Russia, Western Europe and the US book) was awarded a prize in 2007 by the Académie francaise des Beaux-Arts. Andréi • Andréi Nakov’s scrupulous research corrects previous errors, myths and Nakov has organised numerous exhibitions on Dada, Constructivism and abstract art, misinterpretations of Malevich’s work including the Tate Gallery’s Malevich exhibition in 1976.

  • Ausstellungskalender

    Zu loben ist, mit welch großer Genauigkeit sich Verf. des Kataloges angenommen, mit welcher Sorgfalt er jedes einzelne der Blätter geprüft hat, deren überraschend umfang­ reiche Zahl in den verschiedenen öffentlichen Sammlungen und im Privatbesitz mehr als 100 beträgt. Die auf Tafeln beigegebenen Abbildungen sind in der Auswahl als vor­ züglich zu bezeichnen. Leider sind die Zeichnungen alle in einem einheitlichen, rötlich­ braun getönten Offsetdruck wiedergegeben, selbst da, wo der Katalog z. B. grau laviert angibt, was häufig der Fall ist (vgl. dagegen die doch sehr gut auf Kunstdruck wiedergegebenen Taf. 66 u. 68!). Dem Verf. kommt das Verdienst zu, in dem vorliegen­ den repräsentativen Band einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Erforschung des südwestdeutschen Rokoko geleistet zu haben. Sein Werk ist außerdem ein wesentlicher Beitrag zur Kennt­ nis der deutschen Zeichnung im 18. Jahrhundert. Gerhard Woeckel PERSONALIA Der bisherige Konservator am Germanischen Nationalmuseum Dr. Peter Metz wurde mit Wirkung vom 1. Januar 1955 als Direktor der Skulpturen-Abteilung der Ehern. Staatl. Museen nach Berlin berufen. Der bisherige Leiter der Fürstl. Fürstenberg. Sammlungen Dr. Altgraf Salm ist mit der Gesamtleitung der Fürstl. Fürstenberg. Institute für Kunst und Wissenschaft be­ trautworden. GROSSE AUSSTELLUNGEN 1955 Venedig Palazzo Ducale. 25. 4.—23. 10. 1955: Giorgione e i Giorgioneschi. Paris Bibliotheque Nationale. Ab 15. 6. 1955: Les Manuscrits ä Peintures en France du XHIe au XVIe Siede. AUSSTELLUNGSKALENDER AACHEN Suermondt-Museum. Februar BREMEN Kunsthalle. Bis 20. 2. 1955: Zeit­ 1955: Gemälde von Günther Weißflog. Im graph. genössische Kunst des deutschen Ostens. Bis 27. 2. Kabinett: „Bilderbögen“ der Biedermeierzeit.1955: „Das Aquarell“. Meisterblätter a. d. Kupfer­ BASEL Galerie d’Art Moderne.
  • Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus

    Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus

    Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus Staatliches Bauhaus, commonly known simply as Bauhaus, was a school in Germany that combined crafts and the fine arts, and was famous for the approach to design that it publicized and taught. It operated from 1919 to 1933. At that time the German term Bauhaus, literally "house of construction" stood for "School of Building". The Bauhaus school was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar. In spite of its name, and the fact that its founder was an architect, the Bauhaus did not have an architecture department during the first years of its existence. Nonetheless it was founded with the idea of creating a The Bauhaus Dessau 'total' work of art in which all arts, including architecture would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.[1] The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. The school existed in three German cities (Weimar from 1919 to 1925, Dessau from 1925 to 1932 and Berlin from 1932 to 1933), under three different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928, 1921/2, Walter Gropius's Expressionist Hannes Meyer from 1928 to 1930 and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Monument to the March Dead from 1930 until 1933, when the school was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime. The changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus, technique, instructors, and politics. For instance: the pottery shop was discontinued when the school moved from Weimar to Dessau, even though it had been an important revenue source; when Mies van der Rohe took over the school in 1930, he transformed it into a private school, and would not allow any supporters of Hannes Meyer to attend it.
  • ISSUE 207 from Idea to Not All Chairs Best of the Finished Car Are Created Best Equal DESIGNING WAYS for People in the World of Design

    ISSUE 207 from Idea to Not All Chairs Best of the Finished Car Are Created Best Equal DESIGNING WAYS for People in the World of Design

    THE GLOBAL FAVOURITE IN WINDOW DECORATION B-Range in Snow White April 2018 April designingways AUDI CHAIRS DESIGN ISSUE 207 From idea to Not all chairs Best of the finished car are created Best equal DESIGNING WAYS for people in the world of design TAYLOR ROLLER BLIND COLLECTION GOOD GLARE & EASY FLAME AUTOMATED SUITABLE FOR ANTIMICROBIAL UV CONTROL HEAT REDUCTION TO CLEAN RETARDANT OR MANUAL MOIST CONDITIONS Issue No. 207 Issue No. Contact us on 0861-1-TAYLOR (829567) www.taylorblinds.co.za April 2018 for an obligation-free quote and expert advice. @TaylorShutters RSA R35.95 BLINDS & SHUTTERS Est.1959 (incl. VAT) dw • April 2018 i A Stylish Addition enerations of experience and distinctive British design are the foundation of the Romo Gbrand. Renowned for its assorted library of classic and contemporary fabrics and wallcoverings, Romo offers a diverse style and timeless elegance enriched with a sophisticated colour palette. Through an exclusive collaboration with renowned rug manufacturer Louis de Poortere, Romo has designed a striking collection of textural flat weave and luxurious hand tufted rugs featuring timeless Romo designs. Using alluring soft chenilles and sumptuous wool yarns, Romo’s finest designs have been expertly reinterpreted as exquisite floorcoverings. FLAT WEAVE RUGS oven with soft chenille, Villa Nova’s range of flat weave rugs incorporate subtle variations of colour and interesting Wtextures. Using intricate woven details, these stunning rugs perfectly capture the essence of the original Villa Nova fabric. ii April 2018 • dw dw • April 2018 1 UPHOLSTERY LEATHER SYNTHETIC FABRICS CUSTOM FURNITURE Combining artistry and craftsmanship Kohler’s Artist Editions Taylor’s blind product range comprises systems, fabrics and basin collection adds personality to any bathroom.
  • Shifting Perspectives in the Venice Biennale's Hungarian Exhibition

    Shifting Perspectives in the Venice Biennale's Hungarian Exhibition

    17 Looking Forwards or Back? Shifting Perspectives in the Venice Biennale’s Hungarian Exhibition: 1928 and 1948 KINGA BÓDI 268 Kinga Bódi Kinga Bódi, PhD, is curator at the Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest. As a doctoral fellow at the Swiss Institute for Art Research (SIK–ISEA) she investigated the cultural representation of Hungary at the Venice Biennale from its beginnings until 1948. In her present essay, Bódi jointly discusses the frst contemporary avant-garde Hungarian show in Venice in 1928 and the Biennale edition of 1948, which she interprets as a counterpoint of sorts to the one twenty years earlier, defned by conservative ideological principles and neo-Classicism. Her study examines the historical, social, cultural, political, artistic, professional, and personal background of these two specifc years of Hungarian participation in Venice. At the same time, her essay contributes to current international dialogues on the changing role of international exhibitions, curatorial activities, and (museum) collections. (BH) Looking Forwards or Back? Shifting Perspectives in the Venice Biennale’s Hungarian Exhibition: 1928 and 19481 From 1895 to 1948, it was self-evident that Hungary would take part in the Venice Biennale. During this period, the country too kept in step, more or less, with the artistic and conceptual changes that governed the Biennale, virtually the sole major international exhibition opportunity for Hungarian artists then and now. Tis is perhaps why, for the 124 years since the frst participation, the question of the Hungarian Pavilion has remained at the centre of domestic art-scene debates. Comparing nations has always been a facet of the Venice Biennale.
  • The Study of the Relationship Between Arnold Schoenberg and Wassily

    The Study of the Relationship Between Arnold Schoenberg and Wassily

    THE STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARNOLD SCHOENBERG AND WASSILY KANDINSKY DURING SCHOENBERG’S EXPRESSIONIST PERIOD D.M.A. DOCUMENT Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Musical Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sohee Kim, B.M., M.M. Graduate Program in Music The Ohio State University 2010 D.M.A. Document Committee: Professor Donald Harris, Advisor Professor Jan Radzynski Professor Arved Mark Ashby Copyright by Sohee Kim 2010 ABSTRACT Expressionism was a radical form of art at the start of twentieth century, totally different from previous norms of artistic expression. It is related to extremely emotional states of mind such as distress, agony, and anxiety. One of the most characteristic aspects of expressionism is the destruction of artistic boundaries in the arts. The expressionists approach the unified artistic entity with a point of view to influence the human subconscious. At that time, the expressionists were active in many arts. In this context, Wassily Kandinsky had a strong influence on Arnold Schoenberg. Schoenberg‟s attention to expressionism in music is related to personal tragedies such as his marital crisis. Schoenberg solved the issues of extremely emotional content with atonality, and devoted himself to painting works such as „Visions‟ that show his anger and uneasiness. He focused on the expression of psychological depth related to Unconscious. Both Schoenberg and Kandinsky gained their most significant artistic development almost at the same time while struggling to find their own voices, that is, their inner necessity, within an indifferent social environment. Both men were also profound theorists who liked to explore all kinds of possibilities and approached human consciousness to find their visions from the inner world.
  • Florida State University Libraries

    Florida State University Libraries

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Gustav Mahler, Alfred Roller, and the Wagnerian Gesamtkunstwerk: Tristan and Affinities Between the Arts at the Vienna Court Opera Stephen Carlton Thursby Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC GUSTAV MAHLER, ALFRED ROLLER, AND THE WAGNERIAN GESAMTKUNSTWERK: TRISTAN AND AFFINITIES BETWEEN THE ARTS AT THE VIENNA COURT OPERA By STEPHEN CARLTON THURSBY A Dissertation submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2009 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Stephen Carlton Thursby defended on April 3, 2009. _______________________________ Denise Von Glahn Professor Directing Dissertation _______________________________ Lauren Weingarden Outside Committee Member _______________________________ Douglass Seaton Committee Member Approved: ___________________________________ Douglass Seaton, Chair, Musicology ___________________________________ Don Gibson, Dean, College of Music The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To my wonderful wife Joanna, for whose patience and love I am eternally grateful. In memory of my grandfather, James C. Thursby (1926-2008). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this dissertation would not have been possible without the generous assistance and support of numerous people. My thanks go to the staff of the Austrian Theater Museum and Austrian National Library-Music Division, especially to Dr. Vana Greisenegger, curator of the visual materials in the Alfred Roller Archive of the Austrian Theater Museum. I would also like to thank the musicology faculty of the Florida State University College of Music for awarding me the Curtis Mayes Scholar Award, which funded my dissertation research in Vienna over two consecutive summers (2007- 2008).
  • Dossiê Kandinsky Kandinsky Beyond Painting: New Perspectives

    Dossiê Kandinsky Kandinsky Beyond Painting: New Perspectives

    dossiê kandinsky kandinsky beyond painting: new perspectives Lissa Tyler Renaud Guest Editor DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/dramaturgias.v0i9.24910 issn: 2525-9105 introduction This Special Issue on Kandinsky is dedicated to exchanges between Theatre and Music, artists and researchers, practitioners and close observers. The Contents were also selected to interest and surprise the general public’s multitudes of Kandinsky aficionados. Since Dr. Marcus Mota’s invitation in 2017, I have been gathering scholarly, professional, and other thoughtful writings, to make of the issue a lively, expansive, and challenging inquiry into Kandinsky’s works, activities, and thinking — especially those beyond painting. “Especially those beyond painting.” Indeed, the conceit of this issue, Kandinsky Beyond Painting, is that there is more than enough of Kandinsky’s life in art for discussion in the fields of Theatre, Poetry, Music, Dance and Architecture, without even broaching the field he is best known for working in. You will find a wide-ranging collection of essays and articles organized under these headings. Over the years, Kandinsky studies have thrived under the care of a tight- knit group of intrepid scholars who publish and confer. But Kandinsky seems to me to be everywhere. In my reading, for example, his name appears unexpectedly in books on a wide range of topics: philosophy, popular science, physics, neuroscience, history, Asian studies, in personal memoirs of people in far-flung places, and more. Then, too, I know more than a few people who are not currently scholars or publishing authors evoking Kandinsky’s name, but who nevertheless have important Further Perspectives, being among the most interesting thinkers on Kandinsky, having dedicated much rumination to the deeper meanings of his life and work.
  • Natalia Goncharova's Canonization in Europe After 1945

    Natalia Goncharova's Canonization in Europe After 1945

    Natalia Goncharova’s canonization in Europe after 1945 Elena Korowin Introduction The Russian avant-garde artist Natalia Sergeevna Goncharova (1881-1962) is considered to be one of the major female artists of the early twentieth century. Of all female artists internationally, her works are now among the most expensive; however, the canonization process of her work was quite sluggish. The aim of this paper is to trace the way Goncharova entered the canon of modern art in Europe. In doing so, it will show how differently the canonization processes of male and female as well as exile and non-exile artists from Russia developed in the twentieth century. Therefore, it is important to mark the milestones in Goncharova’s case of canonization: 1. The first acquisitions of her works by Musée National d’Art Moderne in 1950 and by the Tate in 1952. 2. Her recognition within the feminist context in the 1970s, which started with the exhibition Woman Artists 1550-1950. 3. Goncharova’s rising prices on the art market in the 2000s. To understand these three turns it is necessary to observe the cultural-political situation after 1945 in order to contextualize the reception of Russian avant-garde in the West and to answer the following questions: Why was Goncharova ‘discovered’ so late compared to other artists, particularly male artists of the Russian avant-garde; in other words, how does Goncharova’s canonization relate to the canonization of Malevich, Tatlin and especially of Mikhail Larionov? Who were the main actors in promoting her work? This analysis will provide a detailed understanding of the way early Russian art was promoted in Germany, France and England in the post-war period and how it became a part of the modernist canon in art history.
  • Kandinsky's Dissonance and a Schoenbergian View of <Em

    Kandinsky's Dissonance and a Schoenbergian View of <Em

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 7-10-2008 Kandinsky’s Dissonance and a Schoenbergian View of Composition VI Shannon M. Annis University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Annis, Shannon M., "Kandinsky’s Dissonance and a Schoenbergian View of Composition VI" (2008). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/122 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kandinsky’s Dissonance and a Schoenbergian View of Composition VI by Shannon M. Annis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Art History College of Visual and Performing Arts University of South Florida Major Professor: Riccardo Marchi, Ph.D. Elisabeth Fraser, Ph.D. Maria Cizmic, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 10, 2008 Keywords: music, abstraction, painting, structure, theory © Copyright 2008, Shannon Annis Table of Contents List of Figures.................................................................................................................. ii Abstract..........................................................................................................................
  • Christian Hesse Auktionen Bücher · Autographen · Kunst Auktion 17

    Christian Hesse Auktionen Bücher · Autographen · Kunst Auktion 17

    christian hesse auktionen Bücher · Autographen · Kunst Auktion 17 Vorbesichtigung Osterbekstraße 86 a Dienstag, 22. Mai 10 – 18 Uhr Mittwoch, 23. Mai 10 – 18 Uhr Donnerstag, 24. Mai 10 – 18 Uhr Freitag, 25. Mai 10 – 18 Uhr für auswärtige Besucher Auktion Osterbekstraße 86 a Samstag, 26. Mai 2018 Kunst · Fotografie · Fotobücher 1 – 195 10 Uhr Bücher und Autographen · Teil 1 196 – 473 12 Uhr Bücher und Autographen · Teil 2 474 – 822 15 Uhr Christian Hesse Auktionen Osterbekstraße 86 a 22083 Hamburg Telefon +49 (0)40 6945 42 47 Fax +49 (0)40 6945 42 66 www.hesse-auktionen.de [email protected] Katalogbeschreibungen Bei allen Objekten in unserem Katalog handelt es sich um »gebrauchte« Dinge. Daher werden Spuren, die dem jeweiligen Alter und einer angemessenen »Nutzung« entsprechen, nicht in allerletzter Ausführlichkeit erwähnt. Zu allen Stücken geben wir auf Nachfrage natürlich gern detailliert Auskunft. Bei Graphiken werden zunächst die Maße der Druckplatte, danach die des Papierbogens angegeben. English translations, condition reports, and additional pictures are available on request. Gebote abgeben Gebot für unsere Auktion nehmen wir auch schriftlich entgegen. Benutzen Sie bitte das bei- liegende Formular. Auch eine telefonische Teilnahme ist möglich, wir rufen Sie dann während der Auktion an. Bitte senden Sie uns Gebote und Anmeldungen zum Telefonbieten bis spätestens 24 Stunden vor Auktionsbeginn eintreffend. Please note: Your absentee bids or your registration for telephone bidding must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to start of the auction. Live Auktion An unseren Auktion können Sie sich über die Internetplattformen www.lot-tissmo.com bzw. www.invaluable.com beteiligen. Registrierung, Verfügbarkeit und Administration sind alleinige Angelegenheit des jeweiligen Betreibers.