DOCSLIB.ORG

<AECOM Report>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
<AECOM Report> DRAFT Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Draft Report November 2019 Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study DRAFT Page Intentionally Left Blank Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study DRAFT Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Study Overview ............................................................................................................................................... vi 2.0 Public Involvement Program ......................................................................................................................... vi 3.0 Baseline Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... vi 4.0 Alternatives Development ............................................................................................................................ vii 5.0 Demand and Revenue Estimation .............................................................................................................. viii 6.0 Capital and O&M Cost Estimation .............................................................................................................. viii 7.0 Cost-Benefit Evaluation ................................................................................................................................. ix 8.0 System Planning and Assessment ................................................................................................................ x 1. Study Overview ...............................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.2 Passenger Rail Service in Alabama ..............................................................................................................1 -1 1.3 Goals and Objectives .....................................................................................................................................1 -3 1.4 Phase I Study – Birmingham to Montgomery .............................................................................................1 -4 1.4.1 Alternative Development ....................................................................................................................1-4 1.4.2 Demand and Revenue Estimation .....................................................................................................1-4 1.4.3 Capital and Operating Cost Estimation .............................................................................................1-5 1.4.4 Cost and Benefit Evaluation ...............................................................................................................1-6 2. Public Involvement Program.........................................................................................................................2 -1 2.1 Purpose of Public Involvement ....................................................................................................................2 -1 2.2 Public Involvement Goals ..............................................................................................................................2 -1 2.3 Public Involvement Plan ................................................................................................................................2 -1 2.3.1 Summary of Public Involvement Activities .......................................................................................2-1 2.4 Public Involvement Meetings ........................................................................................................................2 -2 2.4.1 Round One – November 2018 ...........................................................................................................2-2 2.4.2 Round Two – April-May 2019 .............................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Public Survey ..................................................................................................................................................2 -2 2.5.1 Public Survey Questions .....................................................................................................................2-2 2.5.2 Public Survey Responses ....................................................................................................................2-4 3. Baseline Conditions .......................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.1 Study Corridor ................................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.2 Railroad Characteristics ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Highway Characteristics ................................................................................................................................3 -1 3.3.1 Interstate 65 .........................................................................................................................................3-1 3.3.2 US 31 .....................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.4 Transit Service.................................................................................................................................................3 -2 3.4.1 Intercity Transportation Services .......................................................................................................3-2 3.4.2 Montgomery Transit Service ..............................................................................................................3-2 3.4.3 Mobile Transit Service .........................................................................................................................3-2 3.5 Demographics ................................................................................................................................................3 -3 3.5.1 Study Area Population Trends ...........................................................................................................3-3 3.5.2 Environmental Justice Communities .................................................................................................3-4 3.5.3 Employment Trends ............................................................................................................................3-4 i Phase II Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study DRAFT 4. Alternatives Development.............................................................................................................................4 -1 4.1 Development of Alternatives ........................................................................................................................4 -1 4.2 Potential Station Locations ...........................................................................................................................4 -3 4.2.1 Proposed Montgomery Station .........................................................................................................4-5 4.2.2 Proposed Greenville Station ..............................................................................................................4-5 4.2.3 Proposed Atmore Station ...................................................................................................................4-7 4.2.4 Proposed Mobile Station ....................................................................................................................4-9 4.2.5 Other Potential Station Locations .................................................................................................. 4-10 4.3 Preliminary Service Schedule .................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.3.1 Alternative 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 4-11 4.3.1.1 Alternative 1a ............................................................................................................................ 4-11 4.3.1.2 Alternative 1b ............................................................................................................................ 4-12 4.3.1.3 Alternative 1c ............................................................................................................................. 4-12 4.3.2 Alternative 2 ...................................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.3.2.1 Alternative 2a ............................................................................................................................ 4-13 4.3.2.2 Alternative 2b ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress
    Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan
    Volume I. Summary Report New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan Prepared for The Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission By BURK-KLEINPETER, INC. In Association with Parsons Transportation Group AECOM Consult CSX Transportation October 2006 Gulf Coast High-Speed Rail Corridor New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Development Plan Volume II. Technical Appendices Prepared for The Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission By BURK-KLEINPETER, INC. Engineers, Architects, Planners and Environmental Engineers 4176 Canal Street New Orleans, LA 70119 Tel: (504) 486-5901 Fax: (504) 483-6228 In Association with Parsons Transportation Group 1133 15th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 AECOM Consult 2751 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 300 Fairfax, Virginia 22031 May 2006 Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission Gulf Coast High-Speed Rail Corridor New Orleans to Mobile Corridor Transportation Plan Executive Summary This corridor transportation plan investigates whether, and how, the states of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana could upgrade the railroad corridor between New Orleans, LA and Mobile, AL to achieve those states’ passenger train travel time goals, with reliable on-time performance for all freight and passenger operations. The Corridor Today (Chapter 2)1 The rail corridor between Mobile and New Orleans is a critical link in a longer rail route that connects Florida with Texas and the West Coast. The corridor consists of three distinct components, as shown in Figure ES-1, below: • The NO&M Subdivision of the CSXT Corporation between Mobile and New Orleans, • The NS Back Belt between NE Tower/Elysian Fields and East City Junction, and • The New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal (NOUPT) track between East City Junction and NOUPT.
    [Show full text]
  • 301896 ENTERED Office of Proceedings April 5, 2021 Part Of
    301896 ENTERED BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Office of Proceedings DOCKET NO. FD 36496 April 5, 2021 ______________________________________________ Part of Public Record APPLICATION OF THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION UNDER 49 U.S.C. § 24308(e) – CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION ______________________________________ CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS ___________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. .................................................................................. 1 AMTRAK’S APPLICATION DOES NOT PRESENT A RIPE DISPUTE FOR THE BOARD’S REVIEW. .......................................................................... 7 1. An RTC Study Is Essential To Understanding What Infrastructure is Needed to Support Gulf Coast Service. ............ 8 2. Amtrak, CSXT, and NSR Committed to Stakeholders To Complete the RTC Study, and Amtrak Has No Good Reason to Refuse to Do So. ....................................................................... 10 AMTRAK HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND HISTORIC REPORT WITH ITS APPLICATION ........................................... 17 AMTRAK’S REQUEST FOR AN “INTERIM” ORDER ALLOWING IT IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO CSXT AND NSR RAIL LINES SHOULD BE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE .......................................................................... 22 AMTRAK’S PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IS NOT APPROPRIATE. ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Louisiana Rail Plan
    Louisiana State Rail Plan Prepared for: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Prepared by: University of New Orleans Transportation Institute August 25, 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 LOUISIANA’S RAIL SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Freight Rail System ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Passenger Rail Service ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Rail Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 RAIL PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 LOUISIANA’S RAIL VISION AND SERVICE OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress
    Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Louisiana Rail Plan
    Louisiana State Rail Plan June 2015 prepared for prepared by in collaboration with: HDR Engineering, Inc. Steve Roberts Louisiana State Rail Plan Prepared for: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Prepared by: CDM Smith In association with HDR Engineering June 2015 U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Federal Railroad Administration June 26, 2015 J. Dean Goodell Louisiana DOTD Room S-515 1201 Capitol Access Road Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Dear Dean, FRA has completed its review of the Louisiana State Rail Plan (SRP) from August 2014. FRA’s review of the SRP found that it contained the minimum required elements in accordance with Section 303 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA). This letter services as notice that FRA formally accepts the SRP and the projects listed in the SRP will be eligible for capital grants under Sections 301, 302, and 501 of PRIIA, relating to intercity passenger rail, congestion, and high speed rail respectively. FRA acceptance of the 2014 Louisiana State Rail Plan is valid until June 26th, 2020. While FRA finds that the SRP meets the minimum requirements, the following issues emerged during the review of the SRP. FRA recommends addressing these issues in future updates to the SRP to facilitate a robust planning process for rail in the State of Louisiana: Provide the total funding amount Louisiana has allocated to all rail related projects within the last five years. 2.2.3, Objectives for passenger rail service do not have to be tied to specific frequency and capacity projects, general objectives can be helpful in shaping the level of desired service in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Gulf Coast Service Plan
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 II. INTRODUCTION 9 III. STATIONS 15 IV. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 22 V. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 33 VI. IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 38 VII. PROJECTED SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE 41 VIII. PUBLIC OUTREACH 42 IX. RAIL STAKEHOLDERS 45 X. PUBLIC BENEFITS 47 XI. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 50 XII. EXHIBITS 52 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background Enacted into law on October 16, 2008, the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) (Public Law 110-453) reauthorizes the nation’s intercity passenger rail provider, Amtrak, and establishes new programs and policies to strengthen the U.S. intercity passenger rail system. Section 226 of PRIIA requires Amtrak to develop, by July 16, 2009, a plan for restoring passenger rail service between New Orleans, Louisiana and Sanford, Florida. The plan is to include a projected timeline and projected costs, and identify any legislative changes required to support reinstatement of service. The report fulfills the requirements of Section 226. It identifies the most feasible options for restoring service and their projected timelines and costs, and the need for legislative action to provide additional funding if one of the options is chosen. During the development of the report, Amtrak consulted with representatives from the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida; host railroad partners; rail passengers; rail labor representatives; and other entities, as appropriate and as specified by Section 226. B. Service History In 1993, Amtrak’s Sunset Limited, which operated between Los Angeles, California and New Orleans, Louisiana, was extended east from New Orleans to Jacksonville, Orlando, and initially to Miami, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim-Access-Notice
    EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED ______________________________________________ BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DOCKET NO. FD 36496 ______________________________________________ APPLICATION OF THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. UNDER 49 U.S.C. § 24308(e) – CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION __________________________________________________________________ NOTICE REGARDING AMTRAK’S PENDING REQUEST FOR INTERIM ORDER Eleanor D. Acheson Jessica Ring Amunson Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel Kali N. Bracey & Corporate Secretary Caroline C. Cease National Railroad Passenger Corporation Jenner & Block LLP 1 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 1099 New York Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 Suite 900 (202) 906-3971 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 639-6000 [email protected] Counsel for National Railroad Passenger Corporation EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DOCKET NO. FD 36496 ______________________________________________ APPLICATION OF THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. UNDER 49 U.S.C. § 24308(e) – CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION __________________________________________________________________ NOTICE REGARDING AMTRAK’S PENDING REQUEST FOR INTERIM ORDER On March 16, 2021, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) filed an application with the Surface Transportation Board (“the Board”) pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 24308(e), seeking expedited treatment and requesting that the Board: (1) institute a proceeding and establish a procedural schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Briefing
    Alabama Briefing Regional Gulf Coast Passenger Rail Service Mobile – New Orleans & Federal Rail Grants July 12, 2019 9:55 am: Welcome Alabama Briefing Regional Gulf Coast Passenger Rail Service Mobile – New Orleans & Federal Rail Grants Wiley Blankenship, Alabama Commissioner and SRC Secretary-Treasurer BRIEFING AGENDA MOBILE – NEW ORLEANS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE & FEDERAL RAIL GRANTS FRIDAY JULY 12 th , 2019: 9:00 am: Welcome Remarks, Introductions, Recognitions (Wiley Blankenship, SRC Sec/Treasury, Alabama Commissioner) 9:05 am: SRC Background (Knox Ross, SRC Vice-Chair, Mississippi Commissioner) 9:10 am: Amtrak Service Summary for Mobile – New Orleans (Todd Stennis, Amtrak Government Affairs, Southeast) 9:20 am: Federal Grant Summary: CRISI (Infrastructure), R&E (Operations) (John Robert Smith, T4A) 9:30 am: Economic Benefit Summary (John Robert Smith, Transportation For America) 9:40 am: Examples of Success – Case Studies of existing operations Hiawatha, Downeaster, Amtrak Virginia (Jim Mathews, CEO Rail Passengers Association) 9:55 am: Mobile Passenger Rail Station (Brad Christensen, City of Mobile) 10:05 am: Discussion: “Behind the numbers” – Details on the summary information 10:45 am: Wrap up Comments (Wiley Blankenship, SRC) No Later Than 11:00 am: Adjourn* *11:00am – 11:30am: Presenters will remain for a Q&A with press/media A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE SRC Knox Ross, Mississippi Commissioner and SRC Vice-Chair Southern Rail Commission • Interstate Rail Commission with a mission to advance passenger rail service and rail-related economic development in the South. • Established by Congress in 1982 (Public law 97-213). • Only Interstate Rail Compact established by Congress. • Composed of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Study
    Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Passenger Rail Feasibility Study January 2020 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Page Intentionally Left Blank Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile Intercity Phase II: Montgomery to Mobile Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Study Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... vi 2.0 Public Involvement Program ................................................................................................................................ vi 3.0 Baseline Conditions ............................................................................................................................................... vi 4.0 Alternatives Development ................................................................................................................................... vii 5.0 Demand and Revenue Estimation ..................................................................................................................... viii 6.0 Capital and O&M Cost Estimation ..................................................................................................................... viii
    [Show full text]