DOCSLIB.ORG

David Schied P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan 48376 248-974-7703

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David Schied P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan 48376 248-974-7703 David Schied This is a EIGHTH (follow-up) “Sworn Crime Report” to the P.O. Box 1378 Attorney General of the USDOJ and the SECOND to The Novi, Michigan 48376 President and Jeff Sessions. I sent seven previous ones on 248-974-7703 7/18/16 (ID # 3482111), and 8/30/16, and 9/12/16, and 10/5/16, [email protected] 10/12/16, 12/5/17, and 1/4/17 with only one UNSIGNED response from the “Investigations Division” of the “Office of the 2/27/17 Inspector General” REFUSING TO EVEN INVESTIGATE Attn: Donald Trump, President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. NOTICE TO AGENT IS Washington, DC 20500 NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL (and vice versa) Attn: Jeff Sessions, United States Attorney General THIS IS A SWORN AND U.S. Department of Justice NOTARIZED CRIME REPORT 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW AND A Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT! Attn: Jessie Panuccio, Acting Associate Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Attn: Rex Tillerson, Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 “C” St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20520 Attn: Steven Terner Mnuchin, Secretary of the United States Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20220 Re: Follow-up “Criminal Complaint / Affidavit of Obligation / Claim of Damages in Commerce” To President Trump, Mr Sessons, Mr. Panuccio, Mr. Tillerson, and Mr. Mmuchin: I find there to be a real problem with having received on a single paragraph letter dated 1/31/17, that was unsigned (i.e., from an unaccountable human being as decision-maker) from the “Investigative Division” of the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice, which did not reference the above Case ID # 3482111, and simply stated, “The Investigations Division of the Office of the Inspector General has thoroughly reviewed the material and concluded that the issues raised do not warrant an investigation by this office.” You should be advised that such a response is in the “pattern and practice” of the crimes about which I have been reporting, both at the state level and at the federal level; and thus, I have added additional criminal complaints against the following named individuals, along with additional “Claims of Damages in Commerce” against the UNITED STATES on this notice to you about these crimes minimally consisting of Seditious Conspiracy and Misprision of Treason. I suggest that while you have started by eliminating some of these people from your new Executive Administration, 1 that you continue “draining the swamp” that continues to ferment with the human waste that remains in your own back yards. Note that a copy of the “official response” letter to which I refer is publicly posted at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david-schied/2017- FederalClaimsinCommerce/022717_UpdatedLedgertoTrump&Sessions/ExhibitsReference dbyLinks/013117_UNSIGNEDLetrfromUSDOJInspectorGeneralDenyingInvestigation.pdf The “human waste” to which I refer, being those to whom I have addressed my previous seven “accounting ledgers” in the form of detailed letters of Criminal Complaint, each which are posted publicly as Evidence for you and other concerned Americans to refer when identifying imposters and usurpers of the People’s power and authority through offices otherwise set up for legitimate government, are found in the addressees of my “correspondence” as found in the referenced links below: 7/18/16 – First “correspondence” provided to Loretta Lynch, the former U.S. Attorney General, as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/071816_CrimeReport2USAttnyG eneralLynchonEvents+MagisCrime/071816_CoverLetter4CrimeRpt2LynchDC.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/071816_CrimeReport2USAttnyG eneralLynchonEvents+MagisCrime/ 8/30/16 – Second “correspondence” provided to Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, and William Baer – in both their “private” and their “official” capacities – as well as the “unnamed agents of the Mail Referral Unit”, as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/083116_2ndCrimeReport2USAtt nyGeneralLynchonEvents+MagisCrime/083016_MyCvrLetr2friendsUSAGLorettaLynch& Co.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/083116_2ndCrimeReport2USAtt nyGeneralLynchonEvents+MagisCrime/ 9/12/16 – Third “correspondence” provided to Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, and William Baer – in both their “private” and their “official” capacities – as well as the “unnamed agents of the Mail Referral Unit”, as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/091216_3rdLetrwithCriminalCo mplaints2USDOJLynch/091216_MyCvrLetr2USAGLorettaLynch&Co.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: 2 http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/091216_3rdLetrwithCriminalCo mplaints2USDOJLynch/ 10/5/16 – Fourth “correspondence” provided to Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, and William Baer – in both their “private” and their “official” capacities – as well as the following list of UNITED STATES “officials”: “USAG” Loretta Lynch, “DAG” Sally Yates, and “AAG” William Baer: Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz and Assistant Insp. Gen. Daniel C. Beckhard of the “U.S. Inspector General’s Office” at the USDOJ; Raymond Husler of the “Public Integrity Section” of the USDOJ; Robin Ashton of the USDOJ’s “Office of Professional Responsibility”; the former “President” Barack Obama; “U.S. Marshal’s Service” Deputy Director David L. Harlow; General Mark A. Milley and General Daniel B. Allyn as commanders of the U.S. Army; Admiral John Michael Richardson and Admiral Bill Moran as commanders of the U.S. Navy; General David L. Goldfine and General Stephen W. Wilson as commanders of the U.S. Air Force; General Robert B. Neller and General Glenn M. Walters as commanders of the U.S. Marines; and General Joseph L. Lengyel as commander of the National Guard ...as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/101116_Information2USMilitary &4th2USAGLynch+15NewDefendantClaimsinCommerce/100816Letrs2Military&USAGL ynch/101116_My4thLetr2USAGLorettaLynch&Co2.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/101116_Information2USMilitary &4th2USAGLynch+15NewDefendantClaimsinCommerce/ 10/12/16 – Fifth “correspondence” provided to former “Secretary of the United States Treasury” Jacob Lew and former “Secretary of State of the United States” John Kerry, as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/101216_Claim&FOIA2USTreasu ry&StateDept/101216_Letr2JacobLew&JohnKerry.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/101216_Claim&FOIA2USTreasu ry&StateDept/ 12/5/16 – Sixth “correspondence” provided all of the above-named “USAG” Loretta Lynch, “DAG” Sally Yates, and “AAG” William Baer; Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz and Assistant Insp. Gen. Daniel C. Beckhard; Raymond Husler; Robin Ashton; Barack Obama; David L. Harlow; Gen. Mark A. Milley and Gen. Daniel B. Allyn; Admiral John Michael Richardson and Admiral Bill Moran; Gen. David L. Goldfine and Gen. Stephen 3 W. Wilson; Gen. Robert B. Neller and Gen. Glenn M. Walters; and Gen. Joseph L. Lengyel, as well Guy Cottrell as the “Chief Postal Inspector of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service” in Detroit, to the “U.S. Postal Inspection Service” in Pittsburgh, and to “Mail Fraud Management” at the “Criminal Investigations Service” for the “U.S. Postal Inspection Service” in Chicago ...as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/120516_5thNotice2USAGetal+US PostalInspect/120516_Notic2PostalInspectSvc+5thLetr2USAGLorettaLynch&Co2.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence found at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david- schied/2015_SchiedvJudgeKarenKhaliletalinUSDCEDM/120516_5thNotice2USAGetal+US PostalInspect/ 1/4/17 – Seventh “correspondence” provided to the former “Secretary of the United States Treasury” Jacob Lew, to the current “Inspector General of the U.S. Treasury” Eric Thorson, and to Rich Delmar as “Counsel to the Inspector General” at the U.S. Treasury, as found on the Internet, as of the date of this writing, at: http://cases.michigan.constitutionalgov.us/david-schied/2017- FederalClaimsinCommerce/022717_UpdatedLedgertoTrump&Sessions/ExhibitsReference dbyLinks/010417_TreasurerLewCounselDelmar&InspecGenThorson.pdf ...and with the accompanying Evidence referenced by that correspondence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JULY 22, 2004 No. 103 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was APPOINTMENT OF ACTING vote on Richard Griffin and then David called to order by the Honorable SAXBY PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE McKeague. Therefore, Senators can ex- CHAMBLISS, a Senator from the State of The PRESIDING OFFICER. The pect the first votes of the day around Georgia. clerk will please read a communication 11 o’clock this morning. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Today’s to the Senate from the President pro Also we will turn to consideration of prayer will be offered by our guest tempore (Mr. STEVENS). the defense appropriations conference Chaplain, Pastor Gene Arey, New Har- The legislative clerk read the fol- report when it arrives from the House. vest Worship Center, Waynesboro, VA. lowing letter: We will be monitoring their action on that bill so that we can determine U.S. SENATE, PRAYER PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, when we may begin debate on that bill The guest Chaplain offered the fol- Washington, DC, July 22, 2004. this afternoon. lowing prayer: To the Senate: I don’t believe there is a need for a Let us pray. Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, great deal of debate on the defense of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby Father God, I come to You today on measure; however, we will confer with appoint the Honorable SAXBY CHAMBLISS, a the Democratic leadership on a time behalf of the Senators of the United Senator from the State of Georgia, to per- States of America and the people they agreement for this afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Supreme Disorder Judicial Nominations and The
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Supreme Disorder Judicial Nominations and the Politics of America's Highest Court by Ilya Shapiro Trump Should Add These People to His Supreme Court List | Opinion. Four years ago, one of the ways that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump disrupted the campaign was by publicly revealing a list of potential Supreme Court nominees, which he later expanded and pledged to pick from. Justice Antonin Scalia's passing in February 2016 had elevated the political potency of the Supreme Court in the election even more directly than would the usual debates over abortion, guns and other legal controversies. If Hillary Clinton had been able to appoint Scalia's successor, so many policy areas would be headed in substantially different directions. Instead, Trump produced a list of judges that held the Republican coalition together and, ultimately, attracted swing voters in key states. Now, having appointed two justices from that list, the president heads into a re-election campaign where the Supreme Court, and judicial appointments more broadly, is no less of an issue than it was four years ago. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's recent cancer treatment is just the latest health concern this 87-year-old progressive icon has faced. She's obviously trying to outlive the Trump presidency, but another come-from-behind win this November would make that hard. And don't forget that Justice Stephen Breyer just turned 82—while Justice Clarence Thomas is 72, after serving nearly 30 years on the Court, and Justice Samuel Alito is 70 and may be getting restless after 15 years of his own service.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 2005 No. 66 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was U.S. SENATE, EXECUTIVE SESSION called to order by the Honorable SAM PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, BROWNBACK, a Senator from the State Washington, DC, May 18, 2005. of Kansas. To the Senate: NOMINATION OF PRISCILLA Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, RICHMAN OWEN TO BE UNITED PRAYER of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR appoint the Honorable SAM BROWNBACK, a THE FIFTH CIRCUIT The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Senator from the State of Kansas, to per- fered the following prayer: form the duties of the Chair. Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask Let us pray. TED STEVENS, unanimous consent that the Senate Eternal Spirit, the fountain of light President pro tempore. now proceed to executive session to and wisdom, without Whom nothing is Mr. BROWNBACK thereupon as- consider calendar No. 71, the nomina- holy and nothing prevails, You have sumed the Chair as Acting President tion of Priscilla Owen to be United challenged us to let our lights shine, so pro tempore. States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Cir- that people can see our good works and cuit; provided further that the first glorify Your Name. f hour of debate, from 9:45 to 10:45, be Today, shine the light of Your pres- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME under the control of the majority lead- ence through our Senators and illu- er or his designee; further that the minate our Nation and world.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Highlight Campaign Plan
    On the ballot Why should you care whether the U.S. Senate confirms a Measures highlight campaign plan Supreme Court nominee now? There are two very important ini- osition 227 of 1998 and would pro- sembly and Senate, Congress and It may seem like little more than tiatives on the November ballot, the vide services for ALL students in the Presidential campaigns. The CTA noise out of Washington, D.C. , but Children’s Education and Health state of California that would put Board approved a Campaign Plan at the current battle to get the U.S. Sen- Care Protection Act (CEHCP), which them on the path to becoming bilin- their May 17 meeting. Information ate to do its job by considering a new is the extension of the Prop 30 tax on gual. on the Campaign Plan will be shared high court nominee has important im- high wage earners, and the Education CTA members will be asked to at State Council, Service Center plications for every student, every ed- for a Global Economy (EdGE), work in support of these initiatives as Councils and in local rep meetings. ucator, every school, and every union which would repeal and amend prop- well as targeted races in the State As- member in our nation. In the years ahead, the U.S. Su- preme Court may rule on issues in- cluding the rights of teachers to due Field work surprises process and a fair hearing when charges are leveled. It could rule on CSO staff Ed Sibby got a welcome surprise when covering an the rights of schools to be fully fund- Alliance To Reclaim Our Schools walk-in event in Lake Elsinore ed in order to provide a high quality in early May.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Alabama Birmingham Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Alaska Anchorage Alaska Legal Services Corporation Anchorage Feldman Orlansky & Sanders Anchorage U.S
    First Year Students' Employers - Summer 2011 Alabama Birmingham Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Alaska Anchorage Alaska Legal Services Corporation Anchorage Feldman Orlansky & Sanders Anchorage U.S. Attorney's Office Arkansas Bentonville Walmart - Legal Department Arizona Phoenix Gammage & Burnham California Alameda Oakland Raiders Berkeley East Bay Community Law Center Irvine Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear Los Angeles AFL-CIO and the United Steelworkers of America Los Angeles Los Angeles City Attorney Los Angeles Los Angeles County Public Defender Mountain View Google Oakland California Attorney General's Office Oakland Hon. Donna Ryu, USDC - NDCA Orange Talley & Co Pasadena Hon. Alex Kozinski, USCA - 9th Circuit Pasadena Hon. Richard Paez, USCA - 9th Circuit Riverside Californai 4th District Court of Appeal Riverside Riverside DA Sacramento California Attorney General's Office Sacramento California Independent System Operator San Diego San Diego Public Defender San Diego U.S. Attorney's Office San Francisco Bay Area Legal Services San Francisco CA Attorney General, Public Rights Division San Francisco Gay-Straight Alliance San Francisco Habeas Corpus Resource Center San Francisco Homeless Advocacy Project San Francisco Hon. William Alsup, USDC - NDCA San Francisco Liuzzi Murphy & Solomon San Francisco Ram Olson Cereghino & Kopczynski Santa Clara Hon. James Kleinberg, Santa Clara County Superior Court Santa Cruz Senior Citizens Legal Services Colorado Boulder Environmental Defense Fund Denver Colorado Attorney General Denver Colorado Supreme Court Denver U.S. Attorney's Office Denver U.S. Department. of Education Connecticut Fairfield General Electric Hartford U.S. Attorney's Office Delaware Wilmington Delaware Court of Chancery Wilmington Hon. Leonard Stark, USDC - DDE New Haven Jerome Frank Legal Services Clinic at Yale U.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Record the Official Newsletter of the John W
    For the Record The Official Newsletter of the John W. Peck Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky Chapter Extended Edition, Summer 2018 IN THIS EDITION President’s Message, President’s Message…1 from Dan Donnellon Judges’ Spotlight … 2, 3 I continue to be blessed and Practice Tips: Filing under Seal, impressed by the dedication and Post-Shane Group…5 commitment of the Task Force on Gender Equity in the Courtroom. On Gender Equity Update …7 July 26, we completed our second Skills Training Session (CLE meeting properly as a real leader, Capitol Hill Day Recap…8 pending). The title was “Beyond Oral and select participants got to put Judges’ Night Dinner Recap…9 Advocacy: Practical Skills for Public those skills to use leading a Speaking” and it really lived up to its meeting of their group. Finally, we SDOH Practice Seminar Recap …10 name. We had over 30 registered had an exercise on attendees, the vast majority of which extemporaneous, persuasive The FBA’s SWEL Friendship…11 were women with fewer than 5 years’ speaking. It’s hard to imagine this Fall Mentor Program experience in practice. free CLE was all packed into 90 minutes. And, of course, the event Announcement…12 Judge Tim Black, Magistrate Judge was followed by a brief Happy Stephanie Bowman, and I led the CJA News…13 Hour sponsored by the FBA. faculty along with other talented, Mock Trial Updates…14, 15 younger women lawyers, Jade We also concluded another Smarda (Judge Barrett’s law clerk) excellent program for law students, UC and Chase: Presidential and Mel Matthews (KMK).
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Law Judicial Clerks List
    Texas Law Judicial Clerks List This list includes Texas Law alumni who reported their clerkships to the Judicial Clerkship Program – or whose names were published in the Judicial Yellow Book or Martindale Hubbell – and includes those who clerked during the recent past for judges who are currently active. There are some judges and courts for which few Texas Law alumni have clerked – in these cases we have listed alumni who clerked further back or who clerked for judges who are no longer active. Dates following a law clerk or judge’s name indicate year of graduation from the University of Texas School of Law. Retired or deceased judges, or those who has been appointed to another court, are listed at the end of each court section and denoted (*). Those who wish to use the information on this list will need to independently verify the information being used. Federal Courts U.S. Supreme Court ............................................................................................................. 2 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals ............................................................................................. 3 First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit Eleventh Circuit Federal Circuit District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Courts of Limited Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 9 Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. Tax Court U.S. District Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ............................................................ 10 State Courts State Appellate Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ........................................................ 25 State District & County Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Judicial Nominations During the Obama Administration
    GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2017 Cooperative Judicial Nominations During the Obama Administration David Fontana George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Fontana, David, Cooperative Judicial Nominations During the Obama Administration (March 28, 2017). Wisconsin Law Review, Forthcoming; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2017-24; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-24. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2942297 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FONTANA – FORTHCOMING – WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW (2017) 3/28/2017 COOPERATIVE JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DAVID FONTANA Introduction ................................................................... 101 I. Naming ..................................................................... 108 II. Numbing ................................................................... 124 III. Numbers .................................................................. 130 Conclusion .................................................................... 138 INTRODUCTION During his eight years in office, President Barack Obama changed
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review
    Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal Volume 34 | Issue 1 Article 5 9-1-2016 The urC rent Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review Irene A. Zoupaniotis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Zoupaniotis, Irene A. (2016) "The urC rent Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review," Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal: Vol. 34 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol34/iss1/5 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zoupaniotis: The Current Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, THE CURRENT STATUS OF D.R. HORTON, PENDING APPELLATE LITIGATION, AND PREDICTIONS OF SUPREME COURT REVIEW Irene A. Zoupaniotis* I. INTRODUCTION Enforcement of arbitration agreements and class-action waivers has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court's construction and interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). Indeed, the Court has generally found that resolution of claims as a class is a procedural, not substantive, right and that as such, class action waivers are enforceable under the FAA. Unlike the cases that have been decided by the Supreme Court to date, the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") protects employees' right to act in concert for the protection of their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Advise & Consent
    The Los Angeles County Bar Association Appellate Courts Section Presents Advise & Consent: A Primer to the Federal Judicial Appointment Process Wednesday, October 28, 2020 Program - 12:00 - 1:30 PM Zoom Webinar CLE Credit: 1.5 Hours Credit (including Appellate Courts Specialization) Provider #36 The Los Angeles County Bar Association is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider. The Los Angles County Bar Association certifies that this activity has been approved for MCLE credit by the State Bar of California. PANELIST BIOS Judge Kenneth Lee (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) Kenneth Kiyul Lee is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Senate confirmed him on May 15, 2019, making him the nation’s first Article III judge born in the Republic of Korea. Prior to his appointment, Judge Lee was a partner at the law firm of Jenner & Block in Los Angeles, where he handled a wide variety of complex litigation matters and had a robust pro bono practice. Judge Lee previously served as an Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush and as Special Counsel to Senator Arlen Specter, then-chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He started his legal career as an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. Judge Lee is a 2000 magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School and a 1997 summa cum laude graduate of Cornell University. He clerked for Judge Emilio M. Garza of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from 2000 to 2001. Judge Leslie Southwick (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) Leslie Southwick was appointed to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8585
    July 22, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8585 I hope the Commission’s report is a call. We do not want to be in the ‘‘what This President—regretfully, in many clarion call. Let’s get our act together. if’’ situation. God forbid there is an- instances—has not consulted the Sen- Again, this is not a partisan issue. This other terrorist attack and the next ate. The two Senators from Michigan— should not instigate fighting with one morning we say: What if? What if we they happen to be of a different party another. We should just do it. had done the job? What if the attack than the President but we know they I wish the White House in their budg- was by shoulder-held missiles? And we enjoy working with the other party— ets had allocated more money. When say: What if we had done the job. What were not consulted. I know it can be people in the Senate, both Democrat if the attack was from ships and ports? done. We have done it in my State of and Republican, said, We need to do We say: What if we had done the job on New York. We don’t have a single va- this, that, and the other, had the Presi- port security or on the rails? Or be- cancy in either the district courts or dent said, Yes, sir, right on—but we do cause someone got across our borders the Second Circuit because finally, not have that. We do not have leader- and shouldn’t have? We do not want to after I said I was not going to allow ship on homeland security.
    [Show full text]
  • Declarations for the Next Supreme Court Justice
    For years, intercessors have been praying about the potential justices that could and would fill the seats of our aging Supreme Court justices. With the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court may look different for the first time in decades. Will President Trump nominate a candidate? Will the Senate move forward? Will we see riots and violence from the left in reaction if they do? All of this needs our fervent prayer. The focus of this Special Report is three-fold. First, we will pray for wisdom and guidance for our President and his ad- ministration in this situation. Second, we encourage you to pray for each of the nominees who are currently on the list of candidates for Supreme Court justice, as recently released by President Trump. Third, pray for our nation and the pro- cess of appointing the next Supreme Court justice. It will be contentious. GOD IS IN THE TIMING Incidentally, Ginsburg died and left this vacancy on Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year—a day of new beginnings. Is this a new beginning for the Supreme Court and perhaps a turning point for our nation? In preparation for an open seat that may occur at any time, a faithful group of believers have been interceding regu- larly for the seats that could be vacated. Seeking God, claiming those seats for God’s chosen judges, is the focus of this small dedicated group of intercessors. Called to intercede particularly for the Supreme Court, these lawyers, lead- ers, and intercessors are well-informed on the happenings of the Court and its processes and the potential candidates who may be put forth by the nominating Administration.
    [Show full text]