DOCSLIB.ORG

CMR Existing Water and Wastewater Servicing and Regional Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CMR Existing Water and Wastewater Servicing and Regional Potential CALGARY METROPOLITAN REGION EXISTING WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICING & REGIONAL POTENTIAL November 2019 4626.0002.01 www.urbansystems.ca Prepared for: Prepared by: This report is prepared for the sole use of the Calgary Calgary Metropolitan Region Board Urban Systems Ltd. Metropolitan Region Board. No representations of any kind 602 11 Ave SW Suite 305, Suite 101, 134 - 11 Avenue SE, are made by Urban Systems Ltd. or its employees to any party Calgary, AB T2R 1J8 Calgary, AB T2G 0X5 with whom Urban Systems Ltd. does not have a contract. © 2019 URBANSYSTEMS® Page | i Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Intent .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2 Service Areas .................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Population Projections ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1 Service Area Population Projections ............................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Service Areas Not Included........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Service Area Demands and Flows ......................................................................................................................... 10 3 Existing and Potential Regional Systems ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Potential Regional Systems ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Water Treatment ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Water Treatment Systems Not Included .................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Water Licencing ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Water Corridors ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Water Corridors Not Included..................................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Wastewater Treatment ............................................................................................................................................ 17 3.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Systems Not Included ........................................................................................... 18 3.6 Wastewater Corridors ............................................................................................................................................. 18 3.6.1 Wastewater Corridors Not Included ........................................................................................................... 19 4 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Water and Wastewater Inventory Maps ................................................................................................................. 20 4.2 Water Treatment ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.1 Existing Capacity vs. Existing Population .................................................................................................. 23 4.2.2 Existing Capacity vs. 20-Year Population .................................................................................................. 23 4.2.3 Existing Capacity vs 2076/Buildout Population .......................................................................................... 23 4.3 Water Licence .......................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.3.1 Annual Water Licence vs. Existing Population ........................................................................................... 29 4.3.2 Annual Water Licence vs. 20-Year Population........................................................................................... 29 4.3.3 Annual Water Licence vs. 2076/Buildout Population ................................................................................. 29 4.4 Water Corridors ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 4.4.1 Existing Capacity vs. Existing Population .................................................................................................. 35 4.4.2 Existing Capacity vs. 20-Year Population .................................................................................................. 35 4.4.3 Existing Capacity vs. 2076/Buildout Population ......................................................................................... 35 4.5 Wastewater Treatment ............................................................................................................................................ 41 4.5.1 Existing Capacity vs. Existing Population .................................................................................................. 41 4.5.2 Existing Capacity vs. 20-Year Population .................................................................................................. 41 4.5.3 Existing Capacity vs. 2076/Buildout Population ......................................................................................... 41 4.6 Wastewater Corridors ............................................................................................................................................. 47 CALGARY METROPOLITAN REGION EXISTING WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICING AND REGIONAL POTENTIAL OCTOBER 2019 Page | ii 4.6.1 Existing Capacity vs. Existing Population .................................................................................................. 47 4.6.2 Existing Capacity vs. 20-Year Population .................................................................................................. 47 4.6.3 Existing Capacity vs. 2076/Buildout Population ......................................................................................... 47 5 Summary of Findings...................................................................................................................................... 53 5.1 Water Treatment ...................................................................................................................................................... 53 5.2 Water Licence .......................................................................................................................................................... 54 5.3 Water Corridors ....................................................................................................................................................... 55 5.4 Wastewater Treatment ............................................................................................................................................ 56 5.5 Wastewater Corridors ............................................................................................................................................. 57 6 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 58 Tables Table 1 - Service Area Population Summary .................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2 - Water Treatment Plant Infrastructure Summary .............................................................................................................. 12 Table 3 - Water Licence Annual Diversion Volume Summary ........................................................................................................ 14 Table 4 – Water Corridors Infrastructure Summary ........................................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 - Wastewater Treatment Plant Infrastructure Summary ..................................................................................................... 17 Table 6 - Wastewater Corridors Infrastructure Summary ................................................................................................................ 19 Figures Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agriculture Roots Honoured at BMO
    July 12, 2013 NEWS RELEASE AGRICULTURAL ROOTS HONOURED AT BMO FARM FAMILY AWARDS Calgary – On Monday morning, the Calgary Stampede and BMO Bank of Montreal held the annual Farm Family Awards ceremony and reception at the Palomino Room in the BMO Centre. Sixteen families, each representing a county or municipal district, gathered together to celebrate the values, heritage and hard work that built, and continues to build, Alberta’s rural communities and agricultural economy. Each family honoured represents a multi-generational contribution to the health of their community – not just by growing a successful agricultural business, but also by participating in the various inter-related structures that make up a vital rural society. Naturally, BMO Farm Family Awards honourees exhibit a strong sense of their place in the continuing evolution of agricultural practices, perhaps best voiced by Gary Malyk of Rocky View County, who said, “I feel a responsibility. I’m here because of the people who were here before me. There are all kinds of facets to that, like looking after the land and making sure it’s in better shape when I’m done with it.” The common bond for all who earned a BMO Farm Family Award is their love and passion for what they do. Farming or ranching is a life like no other and requires character and determination. According to David Bruketa of the M.D. of Foothills, No. 31, “It facilitates strength of character. You can’t affect outcomes as much as you learn to adapt to reality and to circumstances.” Every year, the counties, municipal districts and special areas across southern Alberta – from Red Deer south – nominate one family to receive the BMO Farm Family Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoestring Ranch Recognized for Environmental
    2018 WINTER management, but once they switched to SHOESTRING RANCH focus more on the soil, everything came together. The ranch practices minimum tillage when seeding crops to keep residue RECOGNIZED FOR anchored in the soil and protect the structure to prevent erosion. ENVIRONMENTAL “We try to take an environmental focus on PAGE 2 all the decisions that we do here at the NEW BEGINNINGS STEWARDSHIP ranch, and try to include it in all of our management steps,” said Ian. “We have PAGE 3 Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) presented tried to work with nature as much as we RISKS AND REWARDS Ian and Carman Murray with the 2018 can and we’ve changed the management of Environmental Stewardship Award at the our ranch dramatically to do so.” PAGE 4 ABP Annual General Meeting in December. Dugouts are fenced off with several solar Each year, ABP recognizes a cattle NOW’S THE TIME TO power watering systems to provide better operation that demonstrates leadership CONNECT WITH YOUR VET quality water for the cattle and support in environmental stewardship – one that healthy riparian areas. Shelterbelts are PAGE 5 contributes to the land while improving maintained to protect from wind erosion productivity and profitability. REVAMPING EDUCATION and provide wildlife habitat. PAGE 6 Ian is a fifth-generation Alberta rancher “I’d like to continue to improve upon the whose family originally homesteaded INCENTIVISING ECOSYSTEM utilization of our land, our production, our in 1883, west of Calgary in the Jumping SERVICES cattle and pastures. I’d like to continue to Pound District. In 2007, Ian and Carman improve the health of our soil PAGE 7 moved from north of Cochrane to and the cleanliness of our water,” said Ian.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenbow Archives Canadian Pacific Railway. Right-Of-Way Department
    Glenbow Archives Canadian Pacific Railway. Right-of-Way Department fonds (M-9591) Return to inventory: http://www.glenbow.org/collections/search/findingAids/archhtm/cpr_right.cfm Series 69 Station ground plans and title records plans. 1891-1979. Roll-1 Manitoba-CPR Station Grounds Plans: M-9591-OS-01. Deloraine, Manitoba. Dated ca. 1965. M-9591-OS-02. Gimli, Manitoba. Dated May 1968 revised Nov 1969. M-9591-OS-03. Hartney, Manitoba. Dated Feb 1937 revised May 1967. M-9591-OS-04. Minnedosa, Manitoba. Dated Apr 1923 revised Nov 1950. M-9591-OS-05. North Transcona Railway Yard. (in 3 parts). Dated May 1944 revised Dec 1972. M-9591-OS-06. Oak Lake, Manitoba. Dated Mar 1934 revised Jan 1965. M-9591-OS-07. Paddington Station grounds c/w GWWD Rly. Not dated, ca.1944. Missing title block. Part of St Boniface Plan. M-9591-OS-08. Selkirk, Manitoba. (shows location of second Selkirk station) Dated March 1953, revised November 1969. M-9591-OS-09. Selkirk, Manitoba-Industrial River Spur. Dated January 1949, revised September 1949. M-9591-OS-10. St Boniface Yard (showing Whitter Junction). Dated June 1944, revised Mar 1973. M-9591-OS-11. Virden, Manitoba. Dated Mar 1928 revised July 1963. M-9591-OS-12. Waskada, Manitoba. Dated Apr 1913 revised Nov 1960. M-9591-OS-13. Weston Shops - Part of Main Winnipeg Terminals. Not Dated, ca.1965. Sheet 1. M-9591-OS-14. Winnipeg Yard Plan-Winnipeg Station area. Not Dated ca.1965. Sheet 3. M-9591-OS-15. Winnipeg-City lots north of old Exhibition Grounds-Dated November 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky View County and Kneehill County Intermunicipal Development Plan
    Bylaw 1805 Rocky View County and Kneehill County Intermunicipal Development Plan Revised September 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dispute Resolution ......................................................................... 9 Definitions……………………………………………………10 Introduction……………………………………………………1 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................. 1 Municipal Profiles…………………………………………..2 Rocky View County.............................................................................. 2 Kneehill County ................................................................................... 2 Legislative Requirements……………………………….2 Plan Area……………………………………………………….3 Plan Area Characteristics ................................................................ 3 Land Use Designations .................................................................... 4 Intermunicipal Land Use Policies……………………4 General Land Use Policies ................................................................... 4 Referrals .............................................................................................. 4 Agriculture .......................................................................................... 5 Resource Extraction & Renewable Energy Development ................... 6 Environmental & Open Spaces ........................................................... 6 Transportation .................................................................................... 7 Plan Administration & Implementation………….8 Intermunicipal Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Assistants Round 3 Final Scores
    2004 Titleist - FootJoy - Cobra Canadian PGA Assistants' Championship September 21 - 23, 2004 Wolf Creek Golf Resort, Ponoka, Alberta Field: 111 Players Total Purse: $40,000 FINAL RESULTS Professional Club Residence Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Total Score Money 1 Jonas, Phillip McCleery Golf Course Port Coquitlam, BC 67 66 73 206$ 6,480.00 2 Matyczuk, Davidson Willows GC (The) Saskatoon, SK 72 67 72 211$ 3,888.00 3 Smith, Keir National Golf Club (The) Aurora, ON 74 68 72 214$ 2,448.00 4 Stanier, Jason Inglewood G&CC Calgary, AB 71 75 70 216$ 1,728.00 5 Cruise, Rob Kimberley Golf & Country Club Kimberley, BC 71 72 74 217$ 1,440.00 6 Mulholland, Fraser Seymour Creek Golf Club North Vancouver, BC 77 67 75 219$ 1,296.00 T-7 Prusky, Troy Lakeside GC Calgary, AB 72 73 75 220$ 1,161.00 T-7 Whitecotton, Keith Edmonton CC Edmonton, AB 72 74 74 220$ 1,161.00 9 Foote, Kurtis Calgary Elks Lodge GC Calgary, AB 72 73 76 221$ 1,044.00 T-10 Buttar, Blair Silver Springs G&CC Calgary, AB 78 71 73 222$ 900.00 T-10 Horsley, Jason Red Deer G&CC Red Deer, AB 78 69 75 222$ 900.00 T-10 Mucklow, Liam Leduc G&CC Edmonton, AB 79 71 72 222$ 900.00 13 Rodgers, Scott Vancouver Golf CLub Surrey, BC 77 72 74 223$ 756.00 T-14 Banks, David Hidden Lake Golf & Country Club Burlington, ON 79 72 73 224$ 612.00 T-14 Grinton, Shane Stanhope Golf Club Little York, PE 74 75 75 224$ 612.00 T-14 Halliday, Scott Danielle Nadon Golf Academy Ottawa, ON 73 75 76 224$ 612.00 T-14 Lemieux, Richard Windermere G&CC Edmonton, AB 77 68 79 224$ 612.00 T-14 Scinocca, David Northern Pines Golf Course Brandon, MB 71 72 81 224$ 612.00 T-19 Johnson, Jeremy Golden G&CC Golden, BC 76 67 82 225$ 486.00 T-19 Wilkins, Brian St.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 1
    Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 1 Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 2 Vulcan County Agricultural Profile January, 2005 List of Tables and Figures ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Forward ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 History -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Population --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Transportation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Natural History --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Crop Use----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Irrigation------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18 Cropping Limitations and Conservation Farming ------------------------------------------------- 20 Confined Feeding Operations and Livestock ------------------------------------------------------ 22 Diverse Agriculture---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Economic Activity------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal District
    BRAZEAU COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING June 2, 2020 VISION: Brazeau County fosters RURAL VALUES, INNOVATION, CREATIVITY, LEADERSHIP and is a place where a DIVERSE ECONOMY offers QUALITY OF LIFE for our citizens. MISSION: A spirit of community created through INNOVATION and OPPORTUNITIES GOALS 1) Brazeau County collaboration with Canadians has created economic opportunity and prosperity for our community. That we intentionally, proactively network with Canadians to bring ideas and initiative back to our citizens. 2) Brazeau County has promoted and invested in innovation offering incentives diversifying our local economy, rural values and through opportunities reducing our environmental impact. Invest in green energy programs, water and waste water upgrades, encourage, support, innovation and economic growth through complied LUB, promoting sustaining small farms, hamlet investment/redevelopment. 3) Brazeau County is strategically assigning financial and physical resources to meet ongoing service delivery to ensure the success of our greater community. Rigorous budget and restrictive surplus process, petition for government funding, balance budget with department goals and objectives. 4) Brazeau County has a land use bylaw and framework that consistently guides development and promotes growth. Promotes development of business that is consistent for all “open for business.” Attract and retain businesses because we have flexibility within our planning documents. 5) Come to Brazeau County to work, rest and play. This encompasses all families. We have the diversity to attract people for the work opportunities. We have recreation which promotes rest and play possibilities that are endless. 6) Brazeau County is responsive to its citizenship needs and our citizens are engaged in initiatives. Engage in various levels - website, Facebook, newspapers, open houses.
    [Show full text]
  • St2 St9 St1 St3 St2
    ! SUPP2-Attachment 07 Page 1 of 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .! ! ! ! ! ! SM O K Y L A K E C O U N T Y O F ! Redwater ! Busby Legal 9L960/9L961 57 ! 57! LAMONT 57 Elk Point 57 ! COUNTY ST . P A U L Proposed! Heathfield ! ! Lindbergh ! Lafond .! 56 STURGEON! ! COUNTY N O . 1 9 .! ! .! Alcomdale ! ! Andrew ! Riverview ! Converter Station ! . ! COUNTY ! .! . ! Whitford Mearns 942L/943L ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 56 ! 56 Bon Accord ! Sandy .! Willingdon ! 29 ! ! ! ! .! Wostok ST Beach ! 56 ! ! ! ! .!Star St. Michael ! ! Morinville ! ! ! Gibbons ! ! ! ! ! Brosseau ! ! ! Bruderheim ! . Sunrise ! ! .! .! ! ! Heinsburg ! ! Duvernay ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 18 3 Beach .! Riviere Qui .! ! ! 4 2 Cardiff ! 7 6 5 55 L ! .! 55 9 8 ! ! 11 Barre 7 ! 12 55 .! 27 25 2423 22 ! 15 14 13 9 ! 21 55 19 17 16 ! Tulliby¯ Lake ! ! ! .! .! 9 ! ! ! Hairy Hill ! Carbondale !! Pine Sands / !! ! 44 ! ! L ! ! ! 2 Lamont Krakow ! Two Hills ST ! ! Namao 4 ! .Fort! ! ! .! 9 ! ! .! 37 ! ! . ! Josephburg ! Calahoo ST ! Musidora ! ! .! 54 ! ! ! 2 ! ST Saskatchewan! Chipman Morecambe Myrnam ! 54 54 Villeneuve ! 54 .! .! ! .! 45 ! .! ! ! ! ! ! ST ! ! I.D. Beauvallon Derwent ! ! ! ! ! ! ! STRATHCONA ! ! !! .! C O U N T Y O F ! 15 Hilliard ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! N O . 1 3 St. Albert! ! ST !! Spruce ! ! ! ! ! !! !! COUNTY ! TW O HI L L S 53 ! 45 Dewberry ! ! Mundare ST ! (ELK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! Clandonald ! ! N O . 2 1 53 ! Grove !53! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ISLAND) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ardrossan
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2.6 Okotoks Economic Development Strategic Plan (2018 Update)
    TOWN OF OKOTOKS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH STUDY May 2021 Project Preface MXD Development Strategists Ltd. The resulting Commercial Development MXD Development Strategists Ltd. do not (“MXD”) of Richmond, British Columbia, Analysis document highlights seven warrant that any estimates contained within was commissioned by the Town of opportunity areas for immediate and the study will be achieved, but that they Okotoks (“the Client”) in December 2020 medium-term commercial and industrial have been prepared conscientiously on to prepare a Commercial and Industrial development that balances market, the basis of information obtained during Growth Study. Work was completed economic and planning considerations. the course of this market analysis. between December 2020 and May 2021. Three recommended priority projects are identified within these opportunity areas. Reference material used for this report The purpose of this assignment was to was derived from the project team, as well assess, identify and define the potential The figures presented in the report are as from the public and private sectors and development opportunities for commercial based on an evaluation of the current government publications. This information and industrial development in Okotoks general level of the economy in the local was supplemented by MXD’s experience in from a real estate, economic and planning and regional market, and neither take urban planning and real estate development. perspective. The second key objective into account, nor make provisions for was to identify immediate and medium- the effect of any sharp rise or decline in term opportunities for commercial and local or general economic conditions. industrial development in Okotoks and the optimal mix and positioning of land uses for these areas for opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O
    30% SW-COC-002397 Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O. Box 2100 Station M Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 Street Address: 625 - 25th Ave S.E. Bow River Basin Council Mark Bennett, B.Sc., MPA Executive Director tel: 403.268.4596 fax: 403.254.6931 email: [email protected] Mike Murray, B.Sc. Program Manager tel: 403.268.4597 fax: 403.268.6931 email: [email protected] www.brbc.ab.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 Overview 4 Basin History 6 What is a Watershed? 7 Flora and Fauna 10 State of the Watershed OUR SUB-BASINS 12 Upper Bow River 14 Kananaskis River 16 Ghost River 18 Seebe to Bearspaw 20 Jumpingpound Creek 22 Bearspaw to WID 24 Elbow River 26 Nose Creek 28 WID to Highwood 30 Fish Creek 32 Highwood to Carseland 34 Highwood River 36 Sheep River 38 Carseland to Bassano 40 Bassano to Oldman River CONCLUSION 42 Summary 44 Acknowledgements 1 Overview WELCOME! This State of the Watershed: Summary Booklet OVERVIEW OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK... THE WATER TOWERS was created by the Bow River Basin Council as a companion to The mountainous headwaters of the Bow our new Web-based State of the Watershed (WSOW) tool. This Comprising about 25,000 square kilometres, the Bow River basin The Bow River is approximately 645 kilometres in length. It begins at Bow Lake, at an River basin are often described as the booklet and the WSOW tool is intended to help water managers covers more than 4% of Alberta, and about 23% of the South elevation of 1,920 metres above sea level, then drops 1,180 metres before joining with the water towers of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain View County
    June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.1 Mountain View County Community Overview À à À 592 42 à Penhold 22 761 MarkervilleÀ 781 Spruce à À à Caroline View à 2 591 54 2A Dickson Innisfail À 590À 590 Burns ick À 791 Lake À 22 à 587 Bowden À À 587 766 WimborneÀ 2A à 805 584À B = 210 à à Torrington A = 144 27 Sundre 27 Olds 2 à 760À 583À C = 157 À À À 22 à 582 582 Didsbury 582 791À 2A à À D = 25 CarstairsÀ 581 E = 113 Cremona À 580 580 575À 579À À 734 À 766 À MaddenÀ 574 Bottrel 574 Crossfield à à 72 22 À 772 2 à Irricana À À 567À 567 567 Airdrie à à Waiparous À 40 9 Benchlands 567 À À 791 772 Kathyrn Keoma Cochrane Where subcommunities exist, letters (A, B, C, etc.) identify subcommunities; Legend numbers show the number of EDIs analyzed for each subcommunity. # of analyzed EDI 0 - 66 67 - 121 Please note: Percentages tend to be more representative when 122 - 203 ! they are based on larger numbers. 204 - 350 351 - 900 ECMap June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.2 Additional Community Information EDI Summary: Number of EDIs available: 731 Number of EDIs used in analysis:649 % of special needs: 1.6% Age at EDI completion and gender Age Groups ≤ 5yrs 2mos 5yrs 3mos - 5yrs 6mos 5yrs 7mos - 5yrs 10mos > 5yrs 11mos Total Gender N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) F 26 (4.0%) 78 (12.0%) 123 (19.0%) 88 (13.6%) 315 (48.5%) M 26 (4.0%) 89 (13.7%) 121 (18.6%) 98 (15.1%) 334 (51.5%) FM 52 (8.0%) 167 (25.7%) 244 (37.6%) 186 (28.7%) 649 (100%) * Please note: The total number of boys and girls in each category may not add up to an exact total because gender may not have been identifed in all questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]