Preliminary ESA Gap Analysis Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary ESA Gap Analysis Report GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP FinalREVIEW Preliminary OF PARSONS PEnvironmentalROPOSAL TO UPGRADE Site TRACK Assessment CIRCUITS Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors For Prepared & Reviewed by: Gannett Fleming Project No. 060277 Metrolinx Electrification Project Contract No. QBS-2014-IEP-002 Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 i | P a g e Submittal Date: September 26, 2017 METROLINX GO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Quality Assurance Document Release Form Name of Firm: MORRISON HERSHFIELD Document Name: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors Revision No. 2 Submittal Date: September 26, 2017 Discipline: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Prepared By: Jonathan Kerr and Forest Pearson Date: July, 2016 Reviewed By: Leah Deveaux Date: October 14, 2016 Approved By: Amber Saltarelli Date: Sept, 2017 Project Manager The above electronic signatures indicate that the named document is controlled by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC, and has been: 1. Prepared by qualified staff in accordance with generally accepted professional practice. 2. Checked for completeness and accuracy by the appointed discipline reviewers and that the discipline reviewers did not perform the original work. 3. Reviewed and resolved compatibility interfaces and potential conflicts among the involved disciplines. 4. Updated to address previously agreed-to reviewer comments, including any remaining comments from previous internal or external reviews. 5. Reviewed for conformance to scope and other statutory and regulatory requirements. 6. Determined suitable for submittal by the Project Manager. Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 ii | P a g e REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Comments 1.0 December 2, 2016 Submission to Metrolinx 2.0 September 26, 2017 Final Report Version Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 iii | P a g e DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The report dated September, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) under contract to Gannett Fleming Canada, ULC for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Morrison Hershfield disclaims any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Morrison Hershfield also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, Morrison Hershfield has relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. Morrison Hershfield has assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information. Morrison Hershfield accepts no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiency in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by Morrison Hershfield during its investigations as set out in the Report. No assurance, representation or warranty is given regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and data. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by Morrison Hershfield at the site(s) at the time of its investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report. No assurance, representation or warranty is given with respect to any change in site conditions or the applicable regulatory regime subsequent to the time of the investigations. No responsibility is assumed to update the Report or the opinions, advice, conclusions or recommendations contained in it to account for events, changes or facts occurring subsequent to the date of the Report. The Report provides a professional technical opinion as to its subject matter. Morrison Hershfield has exercised its professional judgment in collecting and analyzing data and information and in formulating advice, conclusions, opinions and recommendations in relation thereto. The services performed were conducted in a manner consistent with the degree of care, diligence and skill exercised by other members of the engineering and science professions currently practicing in similar conditions. No other assurance, warranty or representation whether expressed or implied is given to Metrolinx with respect to any aspect of the services performed, the Report or its contents. Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 iv | P a g e GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report – Rail Corridors TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IV 1 BACKGROUND 1 1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 2 1.2 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT 2 1.3 STUDY AREA 2 GO RAIL CORRIDORS 3 TRACTION POWER FACILITY LOCATIONS 5 MODIFICATIONS TO WILLOWBROOK MAINTENANCE FACILITY AND EAST RAIL MAINTENANCE FACILITY 6 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING LAYOVER FACILITIES 6 MODIFIED MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 6 2 PURPOSE 7 3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 3.1 OCS IMPACT ZONE 7 4 METHODOLOGY 8 5 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) REPORTS 16 5.1 UNION STATION RAIL CORRIDOR 16 GAP ANALYSIS 16 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 18 5.2 LAKESHORE WEST CORRIDOR 18 GAP ANALYSIS 20 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 20 5.3 KITCHENER CORRIDOR 21 GAP ANALYSIS 23 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 23 5.4 BARRIE CORRIDOR 23 GAP ANALYSIS 24 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 24 5.5 STOUFFVILLE CORRIDOR 26 GAP ANALYSIS 26 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 28 5.6 LAKESHORE EAST CORRIDOR 28 GAP ANALYSIS 29 AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 29 Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 v | P a g e GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report – Rail Corridors 6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND FUTURE WORK 31 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK 31 List of Tables Table 4-1. Phase I/II or Other Contaminated Site Related Documents Reviewed ..................................... 10 List of Figures Figure 1-1. GO Transit Network .................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1-2. GO Network Electrification TPAP Study Area ............................................................................. 3 Figure 1-3. Example of OCS Support Structures (Portals) ............................................................................. 4 Figure 5-1. Union Station Rail Corridor Gap Analysis Map ......................................................................... 17 Figure 5-2. Lakeshore West Corridor Gap Analysis Map ............................................................................ 19 Figure 5-3. Kitchener Corridor Gap Analysis Map ....................................................................................... 22 Figure 5-4. Barrie Corridor Gap Analysis Map ............................................................................................ 25 Figure 5-5. Stouffville Corridor Gap Analysis Map ...................................................................................... 27 Figure 5-6. Lakeshore East Corridor Gap Analysis Map .............................................................................. 30 Prepared By: Morrison Hershfield 9/26/17 Rev. 2.0 vi | P a g e GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Final Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report – Rail Corridors Glossary of Terms Word Definition 230 kV Aerial Overhead electrical high voltage connection line from the existing Hydro One tap to Connection the new TPS. AC The acronym for Alternating Current. It is an electric current in which the flow of electric charge periodically reverses direction, whereas in direct current (DC, also dc), the flow of electric charge is only in one direction. AFP The acronym for Alternative Financing and Procurement. An AFP model brings together private and public sector expertise in a unique structure that transfers the risk of project cost increases and scheduling delays typically associated with traditional project delivery. Area of Potential An area within the Study Area where one or more contaminants are potentially Environmental Concern present, as determined through the Contamination Overview Study including (APEC) identification of past or present land uses of concern and/or identification of a Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA). AREMA The acronym for American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association. AREMA is the organization that represents the engineering function of the North American railroads. Autotransformer Apparatus which helps boost the overhead contact system (OCS) voltage and reduce the running rail return current in the 2 X 25 kV autotransformer feed configuration. It is a single winding transformer having three terminals. The intermediate terminal located at the midpoint of the winding is connected to the rail and the static wires, and the other two terminals are connected to the catenary and the negative feeder wires, respectively. Best Practices Professional procedures that are accepted or
Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto: Get Involved
    City of Toronto: Get involved http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/malvern_lrt/faq.htm Scarborough-Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Transit City Updated of November 13, 2009 Malvern Light Rail in 51 languages Transit Frequently Asked Questions Frequently asked questions General Contact us When is the earliest that construction could start and finish? How will Transit City help Toronto? How is Light Rail Transit (LRT) superior to existing streetcar service in Toronto? What work has been completed since the last round of Open Houses in 2008? What specific transit connections is the LRT aiming to address? Existing Bus Routes What will happen to existing bus routes in the area after the LRT is built / Which routes will be changed or removed? Connections and Service How will a connection be made at Kennedy Station? How does the Scarborough-Malvern LRT relate/connect to the proposed extension of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT)? Are both projects (Malvern and SRT) needed north of Sheppard Avenue? What are the future plans for TTC connections at the Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station? Could GO / TTC increase parking spots at Guildwood GO/ VIA Rail Station? Could the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Scarborough-Malvern LRT terminate at Guildwood GO / VIA Rail Station instead of Kennedy Station? How will the Scarborough-Malvern LRT connect with the Kingston Rd transit project? How frequently will vehicles serve the Scarborough-Malvern LRT route? (e.g. every 10 minutes)? Protecting Green Space How will green spaces and trees (Morningside Park) be protected?
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of the Neoliberal City: Condominium Development and Toronto's Cityplace
    Rise of the Neoliberal City: Condominium Development and Toronto's CityPlace Rachel Phillips Condominium developments have become ubiquitous features of Toronto’s urban landscape, emerging in disinvested neighbourhoods, former industrial sites, and defning entirely new neighbourhoods. Tis paper examines Toronto’s condominium boom in the context of the city’s increasingly neoliberal urban governance strategies. Te development of City Place – a 44-acre condominium project located near Toronto’s waterfront on former railway lands – is used in this paper as a case study that highlights how a neoliberal conception of the roles of government and the private sector has shaped condominium development in Toronto. Focusing on how City Place was planned, fnanced, and then sold to particular demographic groups in Toronto, this paper attempts to illustrate who benefts from the city’s condominium boom, who loses out, and how public and private interests work together to produce an increasingly privatized and commodifed urban landscape. Introduction Tis paper will attempt to understand how condominiums ft into this neoliberal landscape Te rise of the condominium is a well-doc- by exploring a series of sub-questions: whose umented phenomenon in Toronto. Since the interests are served by condominium develop- 1990s, a condominium boom has been trans- ment? What policy goals do they help to achieve? forming the city (Lehrer & Wieditz, 2009), with How does a neoliberal conception of citizenship condos popping up in disinvested inner-city and the role of government relate to condo- neighbourhoods, former industrial sites, public miniums and the lifestyles they encourage? In housing redevelopment projects, and new-build order to address these questions, I will begin by master-planned neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Waterfront
    STAFF REPORT . ACTION REQUIRED 9 Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands Area – Architect Appointment Date: May 10, 2010 To: Toronto Public Library Board From: City Librarian SUMMARY To seek Toronto Public Library Board approval for the appointment of the architect for the new Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Librarian recommends that the Toronto Public Library Board: 1. appoints Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects (KPMB) for architectural services for the Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands; and 2. authorizes and directs the appropriate Library staff to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. FINANCIAL IMPACT The 2010 to 2014 capital budget includes $8.637 million to build a new 15,000 square foot neighbourhood branch in the Railway Lands. The capital cost of building a new branch in the Railway Lands will be funded through development charge levies and Section 37 agreements. The construction budget, excluding contingencies is approximately $4 million. The architect fee will be negotiated, and it is expected to be within the signing authority of the City Librarian. However, with additional services that may be required due to the nature of this project, the fee may exceed $500,000, which requires Board approval. The Director, Finance and Treasurer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. Waterfront Branch in the Railway Lands Area – Architect Appointment 1 DECISION HISTORY As the Board is aware, plans have been underway to locate a branch in the Railway Lands for a number of years. In June 2004, the Board approved a strategy for branch development that called for two additional branches to provide service in growing areas of the city – Scarborough City Centre and the Waterfront areas.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 York 1: Toronto City Hall
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 16 York Street Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendments Application Preliminary Report Date: January 25, 2008 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District Wards: Ward 20 – Trinity-Spadina Reference 08 100769 STE 20 OZ Number: SUMMARY This application proposes a 31-storey office building with a gross floor area of 73,725 square metres, retail area of 1,823 square metres, PATH of 2,561 square metres, a 65- storey residential condominium building with 593 dwelling units, and a 55-storey residential condominium building with 503 dwelling units at 16 York Street. In total, the gross floor area proposed is 160,891 square metres (1,731,873 square feet). This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. staff be directed to schedule an open house/community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor; and Staff report for action – Preliminary Report - 16 York Street 1 2. notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site. Financial Impact The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. DECISION HISTORY The property abuts the York Street Pedestrian Promenade Plan which was approved by City Council in 2007. The plan requires improvements such as the removal of the right turn channels and improved crosswalks at the north-west and north-east corners of York Street and Lake Shore Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 York Street: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    CASE STUDY 25 YORK STREET ocated on once-abandoned Buildings: Operations & Main- railway lands, this $250 tenance Platinum certification in million project revital- 2012. The team identified and ized this site on Toronto’s implemented best practices that Lwaterfront. The first major office would continue the sustainable development south of the railway commitment to occupant comfort tracks in more than a decade, 25 and environmental responsibility. York includes 30 stories with a Tenant organizations are increas- five-level podium and three lev- ingly seeking green building els of parking. The building is space in the Toronto market and located in the heart of the Toronto across North America (see For downtown core, just south of the More Information on the Economic financial district. Benefits of Green Buildings). The AAA office building includes Whether it’s for keeping and attract- a gourmet kitchen for employees to ing employees, reducing long-term © Enermodal Engineering / Shai Gil Fotography prepare food, rooftop garden patios, operating costs, or part of a broader Above The building team viewed ground floor retail, a fitness center, corporate sustainability initiative, sustainability as an important element in COMPETITIVE designing a competitive, AAA office tower in a prayer room, and massage rooms. tenants are putting sustainability on the Toronto rental market. Conservation mea- Linking directly to the major attrac- the “must-have list.” sures reduce long-term operating costs, while green certification helps attract tenants. tions of the downtown core, the On the opposite side, developers Opposite The building is set back from the Toronto underground PATH walk- and property managers are seeing street, providing ample space for pedes- way through 25 York provides direct increased competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Shores Corporation
    Waterfront Shores Corporation The Waterfront Shores Corporation (“WSC”) is a single purpose entity established by a consortium of four experienced partners for the purpose of acquiring Pier 8, Hamilton. WSC combines the vast residential and mixed-use development experience of Cityzen Development Corporation (“Cityzen”) and Fernbrook Homes Group (“Fernbrook”), the specialized soil remediation and construction skills of GFL Environmental Inc. (“GFL”) and the real estate investment expertise of Greybrook Realty Partners Inc. (“Greybrook”). Cityzen Development Corporation Founded in 2003, Head Office at Suite 308, 56 The Esplanade, Toronto, ON, M5E 1A7 Cityzen is a multi-faceted real estate developer, founded by Sam Crignano, and it will lead the development of the Pier 8 site. Its unique comprehensive approach encompasses real estate experience that spans the entire spectrum of real estate sectors. With a passion for visionary urban design, Cityzen, is committed to excellence, dedicated to creating beautiful and iconic design-driven developments that enhance the quality of life and place while remaining sensitive to community and environmental concerns. Cityzen has developed a well-earned reputation by working with award-winning architects and designers to further push the boundaries of creating innovative urban communities that are designed to enhance urban neighbourhoods. Through a network of strategic alliances and partnerships, Cityzen has, in a relatively short period of time, adopted a leadership role in the industry. The company’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Boundariesfinal
    THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA BY-LAW NUMBER 212-2005 A By-law to Re-divide the Wards of the City of Mississauga WHEREAS Section 222 of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, provides that a municipality may pass a by-law dividing or re-dividing the municipality into wards; AND WHEREAS the City of Mississauga has experienced significant population growth particularly in the northwest area of the municipality and Council for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga has resolved to amend the composition of council by adding two councillors to the current compliment of nine councillors, for a total of eleven councillors, and in addition maintaining the head of council; AND WHEREAS it is desirable to re-divide the City of Mississauga into eleven wards, and in this regard a public meeting was held on May 30, 2005; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Mississauga ENACTS as follows: 1. The wards described in Schedule “A” and shown in Schedule “B”, attached hereto, are established for the City of Mississauga. 2. Schedules “A” and “B” attached hereto form an integral part of this by-law. 3. Subject to subsection 222(9) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, this By-law shall come into force in accordance with such date as determined under subsection 222(8) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 as amended. ENACTED AND PASSED this 8th day of June, 2005. Signed by: Hazel McCallion, Mayor and Crystal Greer, City Clerk 1 SCHEDULE “A” TO BY-LAW NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 7 East 6950 Mixed Use High Rise Development Opportunity Markham, Ontario Sold
    6910 HIGHWAY 7 EAST 6950 MIXED USE HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY MARKHAM, ONTARIO SOLD MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL CORNELL BUS NINTH LINE TERMINAL HIGHWAY 7 VIEW PROPERTY VIDEO MARKHAM ROAD NINTH LINE CORNELL BUS MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE TERMINAL HOSPITAL CHURCH STREET HIGHWAY 407 HIGHWAY 7 E VENU BUR OAK A CORNELL CENTRE BOULEVARD 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 THE OFFERING 7 RIVERLANDS AVENUE PLANNING CONTEXT RUSTLE WOODS AVENUE WILLIAM FOSTER ROAD 9 TRANSIT & AMENITIES 11 NEARBY DEVELOPMENTS 11 OFFERING PROCESS CONTACT INFORMATION THE OFFERING CITY OF MARKHAM - POPULATION CBRE Limited is pleased to offer for sale under Court Order 6910 & 6950 Highway 7 East in Markham 2016 337,800 (the “Site”). This + 19.65 ac. Site is located within the City of Markham’s Intensification Area as defined in the City’s Official Plan, and is also within the Cornell 2021** 370,300 Centre Secondary Plan boundary. The Secondary Plan builds policy framework for a regional corridor 2026** 398,300 and key development area centered on the Highway 7 rapid transit corridor and higher density mixed- use communities. The City is currently finalizing the 2031** 421,600 Secondary Plan. The area immediately surrounding the Site is undergoing many developments, such as the **Population projection Markham Stouffville Hospital that underwent a major expansion in 2014 which doubled its size, and the construction of Cornell Bus Terminal with 11 bays for VIVA, York Regional Transit, GO and Durham Regional MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE Transit buses. This new transit hub is anticipated to NINTH LINE HOSPITAL be operating in late 2019. New houses and multiple Markham CHURCH STREET condominium developments have been built or are still under-construction in the surrounding area.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canada Railway Society
    INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 478 AUGUST 1989 TT\ Cr^uvjit : t ^ i>T. • \ ' , • ^ yd ;'.:-t-;"^ ' ( UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Former CPR business car 2, still in its original maroon paint and gold lettering, is pictured near the site of Leaside Station, Toronto, on July 15, 1989. It rests on a section of new track, slightly over two car lengths long, laid beside the main line but not connected. The car will be available for rent for meetings and other gatherings. It will be repainted in its CPR colours. Thompson The first TTC PCC, .A-1 class 4000, is loaded aboard a truck at Hillcrest Yard on June 21, 1989, for its return to the Rockwood streetcar museum. The car was in the Harvey Shop after being-displayed at the 1988 CNE for the 50th anniversary of PCCs in Toronto. p Thomp.son On July 31, 1989, TTC track crews were busy laying track on Spadina Ave. north from Lakeshore Rd., leading up to the new bridge over the railway tracks. The tracks will be in a raised concrete reservation, similar to the one on Oueens Quay. This view looks northwest from the abandoned CNR High Line embankment . , , „ „, --John D. Thompson , August 1989 UGRS Newsletter 3 Observations from a former Montreal commuter By Bob Sandusky . Vacationing near Dorion, Quebec for a few days in July cartwheel past my eyes. A teen-aged commuter had disembarked provided an opportunity to revisit a few haunts from my CP before his time, with spectacular results but no injury except to ', Lakeshore commuting days of 1965 to 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronte GO Major Transit Station Area Study Draft Land Use Scenarios – Technical Backgrounder October, 2019
    Bronte GO Major Transit Station Area Study Draft Land Use Scenarios – Technical Backgrounder October, 2019 Appendix A. Community Services and Facilities Inventory Appendix B. MTSA Best Practices Appendix C. Public Engagement Workshop Summaries Appendix D. TAC Meeting #1 Summary Appendix A: Community Services and Facilities Inventory Summary of Community Services and Facilities Inventory Bronte Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) Study April 24, 2019 This document provides a summary of the inventory of existing community services and facilities (CS&F) within 1.6 kilometres of the Bronte GO Station, prepared as part of the Bronte Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) Study. The facilities, shown in Figure 1 and described in Table 1 below, include publicly-funded schools, cultural facilities, libraries, child care centres, parks, community and recreation centres, and human/social and emergency services. Although the MTSA Study Area focuses on lands within 800 metres of the Bronte GO Station, a wider 1.6 kilometre service Catchment Area is considered to capture facilities in the “first mile” and “last mile” of transit trips that would serve existing and new residents in the Study Area. The 1.6 kilometre radius that delineates the service Catchment Area is shown in Figure 1. FIGURE 1: Location of Community Services and Facilities Within the 1.6 kilometre CS&F Catchment Area Community services and facilities that are currently available within the 1.6 kilometre CS&F Catchment Area are described below. Page 1 of 6 Schools There are two public schools within the CS&F Catchment Area. Gladys Speers Public School and Brookdale Public School are located near the periphery of the 1.6 kilometre CS&F Catchment Area.
    [Show full text]