Noqvitates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noqvitates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y AMERICAN MUSEUM Noqvitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2838, pp. 1-68, figs. 1-80, tables 1-6 February 26, 1986 Genenrc Descriptions of New World Lithinini (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) FREDERICK H. RINDGE' ABSTRACT The six genera ofLithinini from North America and Schajovskoy, 1959, is placed as a synonym of have been studied and described previously, but L. schajovskoyi (Sperry, 1954); as this leaves the practically nothing is known about the members former species that was incorrectly identified with- ofthis tribe from the remainder ofthe New World. out a name, Lacaria orfilai, new species, is pro- Moths from Chile and adjacent Argentina have posed for this taxon. been studied for this group, and a number of gen- Orfila and Schajovskoy, 1959, published the new era are defined. The following genera and their tribal name Lacarini. After studying the group, I type species (all described as new) are proposed: place the name Lacarini as ajunior subjective syn- Yalpa (Y. dalcahue), Callemo (C. monotonos), onym of Lithinini. Guara (G. rhaphis), Siopla (S. derance), Nucara All the genera included in this paper have some (N. recurva), Acauro (A. rotundus), Calta (C. la- of their diagnostic characters listed in several ta- mella), Yapoma (Y. chone), Duraglia (D. xanthe), bles, are fully described, and are separable by using and Laneco (L. suffuscus). The following generic the keys to the adults based on external mor- changes are proposed: Proteopharmacis Warren, phology and male genitalia. Illustrations for adults 1895, is placed as a junior subjective synonym of and genitalia of all the genera are included. Odontothera Butler, 1882; Catrielia Orfila and The difficulty with defining the Lithinini as a Schajovskoy, "1959" [1960], is placed as a junior monophyletic group, based on shared apomorphic subjective synonym of Euclidiodes Butler, 1895; characters ofthe adults, is discussed. It is suggested Incalvertia, replacement name and new status is that a careful analysis of the eggs, larvae, and pu- proposed for Calvertia Warren, 1908, not Bour- pae will have to be undertaken before any defin- guignat, 1880. itive characterization ofthe group can be obtained. On the specific level, Lacaria monrosi Orfila INTRODUCTION For a number of years, I have been work- into genera, and then grouping the genera into ing on curating the extensive collection of possible tribal units. There is an almost com- Ennominae (Geometridae) from Chile in the plete lack of literature on the tribes or tribal collection of the American Museum of Nat- classification ofSouth American Ennominae; ural History. In addition to working with the the one exception is my recent paper on the specimens, genitalic dissections ofboth sexes Nacophorini (Rindge, 1983). While doing this were made; these dissections usually served curatorial work, it became evident that a sig- as the primary means of placing the species nificant part of the Chilean fauna on which I Curator, Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History. Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 1986 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $5.65 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2838 I was working included a group of usually vided the systematic portion of this paper slender-bodied moths, the male genitalia of into two sections based on these geographical which have an anellus with a paired process. areas. Nothing is included from most ofMex- This latter structure is usually present in the ico, Central America, or from South America thicker bodied Nacophorini, but the two outside the specified area. The reason for this groups were apparently different. As this tremendous geographical gap is that we sim- aroused my curiosity, I decided to study and ply do not know enough about the Neotrop- attempt a generic classification ofthe slender- ical geometrids to place the great majority of bodied group; the present paper is the result. the described (and undescribed) genera into As my studies progressed, it became evi- their appropriate tribes. The species are so dent that these moths from Chile and adja- numerous that it is not practical to dissect cent Argentina should be placed in the tribe and study the genitalia of a significant num- Lithinini; this group is represented in North ber in a relatively short period of time. The America by six genera, with at least one being included members of this tribe have such a Holarctic in distribution. The North Amer- varied habitus that normally you do not get ican genera are relatively well known, as they any help or clues as to the possible members have been treated by Forbes (1948), Rupert from this aspect. I fully realize that it is highly (1949), and McGuffin (in press). Some work probable that the Lithinini do occur in trop- has been done on the Andean fauna of Ar- ical America and that, by not including them, gentina by Orfila and Schajovskoy (1959, my paper cannot be considered revisionary. "1959" [1960], 1963, 1964). These two au- But that was never my intent; all I am trying thors proposed the new tribal name Lacarini to do is to establish the presence of the tribe (1959, p. 198) for Lacaria, with additional in the Southern Hemisphere, and to define genera described in subsequent papers. In some of the genera that occur in Chile and their second paper, Orfila and Schajovskoy Argentina. This will give future workers a ("1959" [1960]) redescribed Euclidiodes basis on which to build, which is my other Warren, proposed Catrielia as new (placed objective. as a synonym of Euclidiodes in the present paper), redescribed Proteopharmacis Warren ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (placed as a synonym of Odontothera Butler I acknowledge with thanks the cooperation in the present paper), and named as new Coi- and aid of Mr. D. S. Fletcher of the Depart- ronalia (probably a member of the Ourap- ment of Entomology, British Museum (Nat- terygini) and Pucaraia (perhaps a member of ural History), and Dr. D. C. Ferguson of the the Nacophorini, although I did not include United States National Museum, Smithson- it in my 1983 revision; more study is needed ian Institution, who supplied me with iden- but moths are now at hand so this can be tified specimens, photographs, and the an- done). Two additional genera were named in swers to numerous questions. All of the their 1963 paper, and another one in 1964, specimens illustrated are from the collection which I am including in this paper. Orfila and ofthe American Museum ofNatural History Schajovskoy gave as a diagnostic character (AMNH). for the Lacarini the fact that its members I also thank Mr. Juan C. Barberis, of the have lamellate-ciliate male antennae, where- Department ofGraphics, American Museum as the males ofthe allied Lithinini have sim- of Natural History, for preparing the geni- ple and prismatic antennae. Now that more talic drawings from my preliminary sketches, genera have been studied, together with many and for mounting all the figures. The adults more anatomical characters, I find that the were photographed by the author. supposed distinction between the two groups Drs. W. C. McGuffin (Research Associate, melts away and the two are indistinguishable. Biosystematics Research Institute, Agricul- Accordingly, I am placing the name Lacarini ture Canada, Ottawa), L. H. Herman, and R. as a junior subjective synonym of Lithinini. T. Schuh (Department of Entomology, My study is centered in North America and AMNH) have reviewed the manuscript and Chile and, to a lesser degree, adjacent Argen- have made valuable suggestions concerning tina. For the sake of convenience, I have di- it, for which I am most grateful. 1986 RINDGE: NEW WORLD LITHININI 3 TABLE 1 Nature of External Characters in the Lithinini Plesiomorphic state Apomorphic state 1. Male antennae Bipectinate or laminate Serrate or simple 2. Length of palpi Shorter than length of eye As long as, or longer than, length of eye 3. Scaling on ventral portion of front Same as on upper part Elongate or forming tuft 4. Row of setae ventrally on third seg- Absent Present (sometimes deciduous) ment of male abdomen 5. Hair pencil on male hind tibia Absent - Present 6. Number of accessory cells in forewing None One, rarely two MATERIALS AND METHODS states was found in the Nacophorini, where I utilized 13 characters on the external por- The data in this paper are based almost tions of the adults, 11 for the male genitalia, entirely on the extensive geometrid collection and 8 for the female genitalia (1983, tables of the American Museum of Natural His- 1-6). In the Bistonini the corresponding fig- tory. As one of my aims is to determine ge- neric limits, I have not borrowed as exten- TABLE 2 sively as when I require complete revisionary Presence or Absence of External Characters data for every species in each genus. By using Numbers at tops of columns are those of this method it is probable that a number of Table 1. interesting and valuable species and genera have been overlooked; considering the cha- 1 2 3 4 5 6 otic state of our knowledge ofthe New World Section 1 were Ennominae, it would be surprising ifthis Gueneria + - - + + + not so. When specific revisions are made for Homochlodes + - - + + + the South American genera reported in this Petrophora + - - + + ± paper, it may become necessary to alter the Philedia - - - + + + descriptions as they are given herein; this, Tacparia + - - + + + too, is to be expected. When studying the Thallophaga + + + - + + specimens presented herein, I not only dis- Section 2 sected and slide-mounted (in Canadian bal- Acauro + - - + + - sam) the genitalic structures, but also cleared Callemo + + - - - + and mounted at least one antenna and a com- Calta - + - - + + plete set oflegs ofboth sexes of every species Catophoenissa - - - - + + available to assure that no valuable charac- Duraglia + + - - + ters were missed; however, in some cases this Euclidiodes + + + + + was not possible due to lack of material or Franciscoia + - + - + Guara + + + - - + poor condition.
Recommended publications
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005 This goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principle federal agency for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish and wildlife in their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 96-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of 544 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 65 national fish hatcheries and 78 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Aid program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute
    [Show full text]
  • Agua Potable Y Saneamiento De Paraguay
    ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL ANÁLISIS SECTORIAL DE AGUA POTABLE Y SANEAMIENTO DE PARAGUAY ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL ANÁLISIS SECTORIAL DE AGUA POTABLE Y SANEAMIENTO DE PARAGUAY Paraguay. Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Comunicaciones Actualización del Análisis Sectorial de Agua Potable y Saneamiento de Paraguay. -- Asunción: OPS, 2010.-- 234 págs. ISBN 978-92-75-33102-6 ISBN 978-92-75-33200-9 1. AGUA POTABLE 2. PARAGUAY I. Titulo. 614.7/SA ©Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS/OMS), Representación en Paraguay. 2010 http://www.paho.org/par ÍNDICE DEL CONTENIDO PRÓLOGO 13 INTRODUCCIÓN 15 Principales características del país asociadas al sector de agua potable y saneamiento 15 Resumen de la evolución reciente del sector de agua potable y saneamiento en Paraguay 21 La situación rural 23 Reestructuración del sector de agua potable y saneamiento24 RESUMEN EJECUTIVO 27 1. Principales transformaciones en el sector de agua potable y saneamiento de paraguay en los últimos once años 29 1.1. Examen de las recomendaciones del análisis sectorial de 1998 30 1.2. Comentarios finales sobre el legado del análisis sectorial de 1998 34 2. Conflictos e impedimientos al desarrollo sectorial en la actualidad 35 3. Resumen de las proposiciones resultantes de la actualización del análisis sectorial 37 3.1. La planificación sectorial y las políticas públicas 37 3.2. Reordenamiento institucional del sector 38 3.3. La información sectorial 43 3.4. El sistema financiero sectorial 45 3.5. La adecuación de la legislación del sector 48 1. ANTECEDENTES 1 1.1. El análisis sectorial de agua potable y saneamiento de Paraguay en 1998 53 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Neoliberal Environmental Governance in Bolivia and Ecuador Pablo Andrade A
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Springer - Publisher Connector OPEN 4 The Government of Nature: Post-Neoliberal Environmental Governance in Bolivia and Ecuador Pablo Andrade A. Introduction In 2005 and 2006, anti-neoliberal coalitions won the elections in Bolivia and Ecuador, respectively. In both countries, this development put an end to the rules that had regulated the use of natural resources in hydrocarbon extraction during the latter part of the twentieth century (Hogenboom, 2014). The post-neoliberal governments constructed new institutions for the governance of extractive-industry activities. The new rules of the game have changed the way in which the Andean countries govern extractive industries. It has not put an end to their dependence on income generated from natural resources, but it has changed the way in which that income is distributed. The process of change from neoliberalism to post-neoliberalism was fast, and fraught with confusion and abandoned experiments. This chapter describes that process. Two analytical objectives guide this description. First, I will identify the factors that guided the changes from neoliberalism to post-neoliberalism; and second, I will analyse the pos- sibilities for the governance of mineral and hydrocarbon wealth and the creation of a “government of nature” that were opened up by the new regulatory framework. Natural resources, rentier states, development and post-neoliberalism The contemporary debate about development based on natural resources has existed since the 1990s. Numerous academic studies con- ducted in that decade called attention to the relationship between 113 F. de Castro et al. (eds.), Environmental Governance in Latin America © Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 114 The Government of Nature income from natural resources and development, highlighting the neg- ative impact of the former on the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Bioblitz 2010 Report
    Groupings of Organisms & Key Experts 2010 Berkshire BioBlitz, Pittsfield State Forest, June 4 & 5, 2010 Compiled & Reported by Scott LaGreca Lisa Provencher, Dan Shustack, Jeremy Smith, Mike Gramacki, Lauren Moffat, and Scott LaGreca ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Before listing the nearly 1,000 species discovered at Pittsfield State Forest, acknowledgements must be given. The 2010 Berkshire BioBlitz—the very first, large all- species biological inventory in Berkshire County, Massachusetts—would not have been possible without the help of many organizations and individuals. First and foremost, Lisa Provencher of the MCLA STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) team deserves full credit as co-organizer of the BioBlitz. Not only did she advise and assist with every aspect of the scientific survey, she also single-handedly developed the education component of the Blitz for area schoolchildren. The Berkshire Museum confidently led our group of partner organizations and made the BioBlitz a success; Executive Director Stuart Chase and Director of Interpretation Maria Mingalone are especially thanked for always believing in the power of hands-on, experiential natural science education. Jane Winn of BEAT (Berkshire Environmental Action Team) was our “go-to girl”, ably assisting with all aspects of the Blitz—and sounding the horn which officially kicked off the Blitz at noon on Friday. We are also grateful to BioBlitz partner organization Massachusetts DCR (Department of Conservation and Recreation), on whose property the BioBlitz took place. Mark Todd (Supervisor of Pittsfield State Forest), Scott Dean, Chris Hookie, and Bob Mellace provided critical advice and logistical support. In addition, Keith Babuszczak generously cooked an early breakfast for over a dozen hungry staff and scientists on Saturday morning! Peter Alden (Walden Biodiversity Day/ The Walden Woods Project) is warmly thanked for giving me advice regarding running a BioBlitz, and for providing the template for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 34 Number 2 - Fall/Winter 2001 Number 2 - Fall/ Article 3 Winter 2001 October 2001 Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W. Rings Ohio State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Rings, Roy W. 2001. "Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 34 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol34/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Rings: Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 9 CHECK LIST OF IDENTIFIED LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED AT MUD LAKE STATE NATURE PRESERVE, WILLIAMS COUNTY, OHIO Roy W, Rings 1 ABSTRACT A total of696 species ofLepidoptera is reported from the Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio. This preserve is only a few miles from both the Indiana and Michigan state borders. The great biodiversity of moths is reflected in the bog, fen, shrub swamp, and marsh communities bor­ dering the lake. A check list of species summarizes identified collections for 1988,1992,1995 and 1996 and includes the Hodges et al (1983) species num­ bers, the scientific name, and the numbers collected by different collecting methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Tera: Papilionidae): Cladistic Reappraisals Using Mainly Immature Stage Characters, with Focus on the Birdwings Ornithoptera Boisduval
    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist., 15: 43-118. March 28, 1996 Gondwanan Evolution of the Troidine Swallowtails (Lepidop- tera: Papilionidae): Cladistic Reappraisals Using Mainly Immature Stage Characters, with Focus on the Birdwings Ornithoptera Boisduval Michael J. Parsons Entomology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 900 Exposition Blvd., LosAngeles, California 90007, U.S.A.*' (Received December 13, 1995) Abstract In order to reappraise the interrelationships of genera in the tribe Troidini, and to test the resultant theory of troidine evolution against biogeographical data a cladistic analysis of troidine genera was performed. Data were obtained mainly from immature stages, providing characters that appeared to be more reliable than many "traditional" adult characters. A single cladogram hypothesising phylogenetic relation ships of the troidine genera was generated. This differs markedly from cladograms obtained in previous studies that used only adult characters. However, the cladogram appears to fit well biogeographical data for the Troidini in terms of vicariance biogcography, especially as this relates to the general hypotheses of Gondwanaland fragmentation and continental drift events advanced by recent geological studies. The genus Ornithoptera is shown to be distinct from Troides. Based on input data drawn equally from immature stages and adult characters, a single cladogram hypothesising the likely phylogeny of Ornithoptera species was generated. With minor weighting of a single important adult character (male
    [Show full text]