Scaevola Albida White Carpet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scaevola Albida White Carpet Scaevola albida White Carpet Scaevola albida White Carpet Botanical Name: Scaevola albida White Carpet Common Names: White Fan Flower, Native: Yes Foliage Type: Evergreen Plant Type: Groundcovers Plant Habit: Dense, Spreading Description: Scaevola has been popularised all around the world due to their quick flowering ability, unusual fan flower form and versatility as a ground cover or containerised plant. Popular also for cascading over an embankment, hanging baskets and for sloping sites. Long lived spreading ground cover with a thick carpet of tight, mid- green foliage with masses of small white flowers. Grows 15cm with a spread of a metre of more. Mature Height: 15-30cm Position: Full Sun, Semi Shade Mature Width: 60cm-1m Soil Type: Any, Well Drained Family Name: Goodeniaceae Landscape Use(s): Balcony / Roof, Borders / Shrubbery, Coastal Garden, Courtyard, Groundcover, Low Water Garden, Mass Planting, Rockery, Verge, Origin: Australia Container / Pot Characteristics: Pest & Diseases: Foliage Colours: Green Aphids, Generally trouble free Flower Colours: White Flower Fragrant: No Cultural Notes: Flowering Season: Spring, Summer Like most native plants, Scaevola enjoys free-draining soil although they are Fruit: Insignificant tolerant of a wide range of soil types. Scaevola enjoy moist soil for optimum flowering response but will handle periods without irrigation. Water if you see the Requirements: foliage wilting or the centre of the plant drying out. Feed them a couple of times of Growth Rate: Fast the year (early spring and mid summer) with a general purpose controlled release Maintenance Level: Low fertiliser. Cut the plant back if you feel it needs shaping or revitalising. Try cutting back by around one third. Information and images courtesy of Ramm Botanicals. Water Usage: Medium / Moderate Tolerances: Plant Care: Drought: Medium / Moderate Keep moist during dry periods, Low phosphorus slow release fertiliser, Mulch well Frost: Moderate Wind: Moderate Disclaimer: Information and images provided is to be used as a guide only. While every reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy and relevancy of all information, any decisions based on this information are the sole responsibility of the viewer. Call 1300 787 401 plantmark.com.au.
Recommended publications
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IS20015 AC.Pdf
    Invertebrate Systematics, 2021, 35, 90–131 © CSIRO 2021 doi:10.1071/IS20015_AC Supplementary material Determining the position of Diomocoris, Micromimetus and Taylorilygus in the Lygus-complex based on molecular data and first records of Diomocoris and Micromimetus from Australia, including four new species (Insecta : Hemiptera : Miridae : Mirinae) Anna A. NamyatovaA,B,E, Michael D. SchwartzC and Gerasimos CassisD AAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo Highway, 3, Pushkin, RU-196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia. BZoologial Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Embankment, 1, RU-199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia. CAgriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. DEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 46 Fig. S1. RAxML tree for the dataset with 124 taxa. Page 2 of 46 Fig. S2. RAxML tree for the dataset with 108 taxa. Page 3 of 46 Fig. S3. RAxML tree for the dataset with 105 taxa. Page 4 of 46 Full data on the specimens examined Diomocoris nebulosus (Poppius, 1914) AUSTRALIA: Australian Capital Territory: Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, 25 km SW of Canberra, 35.46414°S 148.9083°E, 770 m, 11 Feb 1984, W. Middlekauff, Bursaria sp. (Pittosporaceae), 1♀ (AMNH_PBI 00242761) (CAS). New South Wales: 0.5 km SE of Lansdowne, 33.89949°S 150.97578°E, 12 Nov 1990, G. Williams, Acmena smithii (Poir.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (Myrtaceae), 1♂ (UNSW_ENT 00044752), 1♀ (UNSW_ENT 00044753) (AM). 1 km W of Sth Durras Northead Road, 35.66584°S 150.25846°E, 05 Oct 1985, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Detail of Why the Hotchpotch Planting List
    19 December 2016 Detail of why the hotchpotch Planting List Beaumaris Conservation for the 8 hectare Beaumaris Secondary Society Inc. Association No. A00348878 College site would severely degrade the PO Box 7016 Beaumaris Victoria 3193 95895428, 0429176725 indigenous vegetation character of the [email protected] www.bcs.asn.au site and its adjacent bushland reserves Beaumaris Conservation Society Inc’s critique of the VSBA’s Planting List for Beaumaris Secondary College is augmented below by the country or region of origin, and the weed potential of each plant. If more information or help on weed potential is needed, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Australian Garden, at Cranbourne, Victoria, has a very robust weediness assessment program set up by Warren Worboys. This is a good argument for one Government department giving benefit to another. It is hard to believe that the Victorian Government’s Planning Department or its Education Department and Victorian School Building Authority have thoroughly checked the plans. The plans appear to have been accepted as presented because: The second arborist’s report appears to be extremely poor, relying on the first report. That does not seem to be good professional practice, and the report should not have been accepted by the Government if it was serious about a second opinion, There is an apparent lack of a finalized plan for the site before work started, The NSW landscape firm, Ochre Landscape, seems not to have researched the area, or consulted with the Bayside Community Plant Nursery staff or Beaumaris Conservation Society Inc. It might not have been given an adequate brief (lack of leadership) as to the types of plant that would be suitable – creating a buffer of indigenous plants for Long Hollow Reserve and connecting other bushland areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India
    RESEARCH Vol. 21, Issue 68, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik1, Lal Ji Singh1, Ganeshaiah KN2 1Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India 2Dept of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, School of Ecology and Conservation, G.K.V.K, UASB, Bangalore-560065, India Corresponding author: Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 01 October 2020 Accepted: 17 November 2020 Published: November 2020 Citation Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik, Lal Ji Singh, Ganeshaiah KN. Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India. Species, 2020, 21(68), 343-409 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT After 7 years of intensive explorations during 2013-2020 in South Andaman Islands, we recorded a total of 1376 wild and naturalized vascular plant taxa representing 1364 species belonging to 701 genera and 153 families, of which 95% of the taxa are based on primary collections. Of the 319 endemic species of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 111 species are located in South Andaman Islands and 35 of them strict endemics to this region. 343 Page Key words: Vascular Plant Diversity, Floristic Analysis, Endemcity. © 2020 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved. www.discoveryjournals.org OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH ARTICLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Plant Species in Your Bush About This Kit This Kit Is Designed to Help You Identify Any Threatened Species That May Be Present in Your Remnant Native Bush
    Threatened plant species in your bush About this kit This kit is designed to help you identify any threatened species that may be present in your remnant native bush. After a brief introduction about threatened species and their importance, the kit lists most of the plants that are thought to be extinct, endangered or vulnerable in Tasmania. The plants are listed alphabetically by their scientific name. A short description and a photograph are given for each species. Information on managing the species is also given where this is known — though in most cases this information is not currently available. An alphabetical list of the common names of the plants included in this kit can be found on page 41. Further information about threatened plant species can be obtained from the Threatened Species Unit botanist on (03) 6233 6556. What is a threatened species? A plant or animal species is described as threatened if it is at risk of becoming extinct. Plants and animals become threatened through a range of factors that may be natural or human induced. A plant population may be destroyed by fire, flood or disease, or by land clearance for development or agriculture. Some Tasmanian plant species are highly localised and therefore more vulnerable to destruction. By far the biggest threat to Tasmania’s wildlife is the loss of habitat through development and land practices such as forestry and agriculture. In Tasmania threatened species are categorised into three classes depending on the level of threat facing them. These are endangered (including extinct), vulnerable and rare. All species assigned to these classes are included in the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Coastal Native Grasslands of Northwestern Tasmania
    Near-Coastal Native Grasslands of Northwestern Tasmania Community description, distribution & conservation status, with management recommendations. Richard Schahinger Threatened Species Unit Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment November 2002 NATURE CONSERVATION REPORT 02/10 Acknowledgements This study was carried out as part of the ‘Tasmanian Grasslands Recovery Plan’, Endangered Species Program project no. 28093, with the encouragement of Naomi Lawrence, Threatened Species Unit botanist. Particular thanks go to Willy Gale and Merv Bishop (Parks and Wildlife Service rangers at Arthur River) for assistance in the field and generously sharing their local knowledge. The report has benefited from discussions with a number of specialists within the Nature Conservation Branch, among them Stephen Harris, Louise Gilfedder and Wendy Potts, while the PWS’s Adrian Pyrke provided advice on fire issues. Thanks to Alex Buchanan, Dennis Morris and Andrew Rozefelds of the Tasmanian Herbarium for helping to sort out problematic species, and also to Ruth Matthews of the Tasmanian Aboriginal Land Council (TALC) for allowing access to Preminghana. Photograph credits: Paul Black, Euphrasia collina ssp. tetragona and Lotus australis; Les Rubenach, Pterostylis cucullata; Hans and Annie Wapstra, Diuris palustris. Finally, thanks to Hans and Annie Wapstra for introducing me to the mysteries of the Arthur-Pieman, and to Paul Black and Aaron Dalgleish of the Threatened Species Unit for sharing some of the toil. Published by: Nature Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 ISSN: 1441-0680 Cite as: Schahinger, R. (2002). Near-coastal native grasslands of northwestern Tasmania: community description, distribution & conservation status, with management recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaevola Albida (Pale Fanflower)
    Listing Statement for Scaevola albida (pale fanflower) Sc aevola albida pale fanflower T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T Image by Matthew Larcombe Scientific name: Scaevola albida (Sm.) Druce, Rep. Bot. Exch. Club Brit. Isles 1916, Suppl. 2: 644 (1917) Common name: pale fanflower (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Goodeniaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 : vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 : Not listed Distribution: Endemic status: Not endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM Region: Cradle Coast & North Figure 1 . Distribution of Scaevola albida in Tasmania Plate 1. Scaevola albida (image by Matthew Larcombe) 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Scaevola albida (pale fanflower) IDENTIFICATION AND ECOLOGY flowers and a tuft of hairs on the back of the Scaevola albida is a cushion-forming herb that indusium. Scaevola hookeri is a mat-forming spreads vegetatively by root suckers. The species that roots at the nodes. Its indusium has species responds positively to disturbance, be it an elliptical orifice lacking conspicuous bristles in the form of fire, slashing or physical found in the other 2 species (Rozefelds 2001). disturbance. It is likely to have a long-lived soil- stored seedbank, a characteristic shared by the DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT allied Scaevola aemula (Threatened Species Scaevola albida occurs in New South Wales, Section 2008), thus allowing it to recolonise Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and areas after long disturbance-free periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Distribution and Evolution of Mycorrhizas in Land Plants
    Mycorrhiza (2006) 16: 299–363 DOI 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 REVIEW B. Wang . Y.-L. Qiu Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants Received: 22 June 2005 / Accepted: 15 December 2005 / Published online: 6 May 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract A survey of 659 papers mostly published since plants (Pirozynski and Malloch 1975; Malloch et al. 1980; 1987 was conducted to compile a checklist of mycorrhizal Harley and Harley 1987; Trappe 1987; Selosse and Le Tacon occurrence among 3,617 species (263 families) of land 1998;Readetal.2000; Brundrett 2002). Since Nägeli first plants. A plant phylogeny was then used to map the my- described them in 1842 (see Koide and Mosse 2004), only a corrhizal information to examine evolutionary patterns. Sev- few major surveys have been conducted on their phyloge- eral findings from this survey enhance our understanding of netic distribution in various groups of land plants either by the roles of mycorrhizas in the origin and subsequent diver- retrieving information from literature or through direct ob- sification of land plants. First, 80 and 92% of surveyed land servation (Trappe 1987; Harley and Harley 1987;Newman plant species and families are mycorrhizal. Second, arbus- and Reddell 1987). Trappe (1987) gathered information on cular mycorrhiza (AM) is the predominant and ancestral type the presence and absence of mycorrhizas in 6,507 species of of mycorrhiza in land plants. Its occurrence in a vast majority angiosperms investigated in previous studies and mapped the of land plants and early-diverging lineages of liverworts phylogenetic distribution of mycorrhizas using the classifi- suggests that the origin of AM probably coincided with the cation system by Cronquist (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Moore-Et-Al.-2014-The-Ecology-Assembly-And-Evolution-Of-Gypsophile.Pdf
    Chapter THE ECOLOGY, ASSEMBLY AND EVOLUTION OF GYPSOPHILE FLORAS Michael J. Moore1*, Juan F. Mota2, Norman A. Douglas1, Hilda Flores Olvera3 and Helga Ochoterena3 1Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH, USA 2Departamento de Biología y Geología, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España 3Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF, México ABSTRACT Gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) exposures and gypseous soils occupy over 100 million ha worldwide, primarily in arid and semiarid regions, with particularly large areas of surface gypsum in southwestern Asia, the Mediterranean region, the Horn of Africa and southwestern North America. Each of these areas hosts a diverse assemblage of gypsum endemic plant taxa, known as gypsophiles. Although plant biologists have been interested in the causes of gypsophily for well over a century, it has only been over the past few decades that gypsophile floras have received sustained ecological and evolutionary study. Recent work, principally in Spain, has revealed that both physical (e.g., gypsum crusts, soil porosity) and chemical (e.g., high Ca and S, low cation exchange capacity) factors may control community structure on highly gypseous substrates. Plant-fungal interactions may also play a key role in plant establishment on gypsum, although few studies have examined this subject. Molecular systematic and population genetic studies over the past two decades have revealed several key similarities in the assembly and evolution of gypsophile floras and taxa. These studies imply that gypsophile lineages have frequently appeared multiple times within clades that are ancestrally tolerant of gypsum, that speciation has been common in the most widespread lineages of gypsophiles, and that most gypsophile lineages first appeared no earlier than the latest Miocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter April 2019
    Newsletter April 2019 CONTENTS Study Group Expectations Study Group Expectations ....................................................1 Royce Raleigh Funding for Goodeniacaea Study Group ...........................1 Welcome to this our first Newsletter of the reformed Goodeniaceae Study Group and like all Newsletters it will My Interest in Goodeniaceae ...............................................2 only be as good as contributions that members make to Distribution of Surplus From 12th FJC Rogers Maree, our Newsletter Editor. Seminar 2018 ....................................................................2 We would like all members to set out their expectations of Dr Kelly Shepherd’s Proposal for funding which was what they would like to see the study group achieve. put to the 12th FJC Rogers Seminar Committee .........3 I have an AmScope microscope with a camera attached, Lechenaultias we used to Grow ...........................................6 and although I am still learning to use it, I am hoping that it will prove very useful. It magnifies up to 100 times. Darwin’s letters .......................................................................7 My first thoughts are that I would like to: Emails from members ...........................................................7 • Develop a photographic record of identification Leaf Cutting Results from Members ...................................8 characteristics of as many species as possible, so that we can confidently name species. Propagating Two Goodenia species from Seed and Some Marvellous
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Indigenous Vascular Plant Checklist 2010
    NEW ZEALAND INDIGENOUS VASCULAR PLANT CHECKLIST 2010 Peter J. de Lange Jeremy R. Rolfe New Zealand Plant Conservation Network New Zealand indigenous vascular plant checklist 2010 Peter J. de Lange, Jeremy R. Rolfe New Zealand Plant Conservation Network P.O. Box 16102 Wellington 6242 New Zealand E-mail: [email protected] www.nzpcn.org.nz Dedicated to Tony Druce (1920–1999) and Helen Druce (1921–2010) Cover photos (clockwise from bottom left): Ptisana salicina, Gratiola concinna, Senecio glomeratus subsp. glomeratus, Hibiscus diversifolius subsp. diversifolius, Hypericum minutiflorum, Hymenophyllum frankliniae, Pimelea sporadica, Cyrtostylis rotundifolia, Lobelia carens. Main photo: Parahebe jovellanoides. Photos: Jeremy Rolfe. © Peter J. de Lange, Jeremy R. Rolfe 2010 ISBN 978-0-473-17544-3 Published by: New Zealand Plant Conservation Network P.O. Box 16-102 Wellington New Zealand E-mail: [email protected] www.nzpcn.org.nz CONTENTS Symbols and abbreviations iv Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 New Zealand vascular flora—Summary statistics 7 New Zealand indigenous vascular plant checklist—alphabetical (List includes page references to phylogenetic checklist and concordance) 9 New Zealand indigenous vascular plant checklist—by phylogenetic group (Name, family, chromosome count, endemic status, conservation status) (Genera of fewer than 20 taxa are not listed in the table of contents) 32 LYCOPHYTES (13) 32 FERNS (192) 32 Asplenium 32 Hymenophyllum 35 GYMNOSPERMS (21) 38 NYMPHAEALES (1) 38 MAGNOLIIDS (19) 38 CHLORANTHALES (2) 39 MONOCOTS I (177) 39 Pterostylis 42 MONOCOTS II—COMMELINIDS (444) 44 Carex 44 Chionochloa 51 Luzula 49 Poa 54 Uncinia 48 EUDICOTS (66) 57 Ranunculus 57 CORE EUDICOTS (1480) 58 Acaena 95 Aciphylla 59 Brachyglottis 64 Carmichaelia 80 Celmisia 65 Coprosma 96 Dracophyllum 78 Epilobium 86 Gentianella 81 Hebe 89 Leptinella 69 Myosotis 73 Olearia 70 Pimelea 99 Pittosporum 88 Raoulia 71 Senecio 72 Concordance 101 Other taxonomic notes 122 Taxa no longer considered valid 123 References 125 iii SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS ◆ Changed since 2006 checklist.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of the Vascular Flora of the Anglesea and Aireys Inlet Area
    An inventory of the vascular flora of the Anglesea and Aireys Inlet area, extending to Torquay on Tertiary and Quaternary sediments, eastern Otway Plain Bioregion, Victoria Geoff W. Carr, Ecology Australia Pty Ltd., 88 B Station Street, Fairfield, Vic 3078 ([email protected]) Version 4, 3 September 2017 Introduction This inventory of the vascular flora of the Anglesea-Aireys Inlet area, extending to Torquay in the eastern Otway Plain Bioregion, was commenced about 10 years ago. Only the vascular flora is dealt with because the non-vascular flora is poorly documented, that is surveyed and collected. Similarly the fungi have been neglected. The purposes of the inventory are to: • compile as complete a list of the indigenous and exotic flora as possible, updated as appropriate when additional taxa are recorded • document and highlight the extraordinary species richness of the indigenous flora; there are for example 124 indigenous orchid species (Orchidaceae) which comprises 31% of the Victorian orchid flora (VicFlora; Backhouse, Kosky, Rouse and Turner 2016; Forster and McDonald 2009) and 71 indigenous sedge species (Cyperaceae) comprising 40% of the family in Victoria (see VicFlora). Statistics for the flora are given in Table 1 • provide a checklist of species/taxa as an aid for plant identification in vegetation survey and quadrat data collection in the region covered • provide a checklist of environmental weed species of management concern, or potential management concern, in the region • highlight the local and regional endemism in the flora, as well as the suite of species or taxa that are as yet undescribed (mostly recognised as a result of the taxonomic research undertaken by G.
    [Show full text]