X-RAY SCIENCE on ESA's BEPICOLOMBO MISSION TO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

X-RAY SCIENCE on ESA's BEPICOLOMBO MISSION TO Mercury: Space Environment, Surface, and Interior (2001) 8040.pdf X-RAY SCIENCE ON ESA’s BEPICOLOMBO MISSION TO MERCURY S. K. Dunkin1,2, M. Grande1, and B.J. Kellett1 1 Space Science and Technology Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton Didcot, OX11 0QX, UK 2 Department of Geological Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK ([email protected]) Introduction: Mercury has been visited only the lunar maria (dark lava plains) although with very once by a spacecraft, with Mariner 10 completing 3 important differences. They have a much higher visible flybys in 1974/5. It closeness to the Sun makes ground- albedo than the lunar maria and no areas of low albedo based observations very difficult, and hence our blue-colour material representative of the high-titanium knowledge of Mercury is extremely limited. This paper mare basalts found on the Moon. However, the smooth outlines the science drivers of an X-ray instrument (i.e. plains appear to fill in craters, suggesting a flowing CIXS, [1]) to fly on a spacecraft such as ESA’s Bepi- nature (i.e. volcanic deposition). This, along with their Colombo mission. comparative youth relative to the basins they occupy, The Surface of Mercury: Only 45% of the and some irregular depressions which suggest volcanic surface of Mercury was imaged by Mariner 10, at only origin, all imply that volcanism has played an impor- 2 wavelengths, and only ~1% with a resolution of bet- tant part in Mercury’s past. There are suggestions that a ter than 0.5km. Our knowledge of the surface of Mer- highly differentiated magma may have produced more cury is therefore very limited, but what we do know alkaline basalts (i.e. those rich in Na and K, [3]) an X- tells us that any resemblance to the Moon is superficial. ray spectrometer such as CIXS is ideal to detect such Mercury has a systematically higher albedo at visible elements. wavelengths than comparable terrains on the Moon, but Spectra of Mercury have average spectral at UV wavelengths has a very much lower albedo, in- characteristics midway between Na-rich plagioclase dicating that the surface composition is very different. (NaAlSi3O8), and Ca-rich plagioclase (CaAl2Si2O8) Mercury can be split into a number of terrains. implying that Mercury may be more Na-rich than the The cratered areas are analogous to the lunar high- lunar surface (which is mainly of the Ca-rich variety). lands and represent the oldest terrain on Mercury. Im- An X-ray spectrometer with sufficiently high spectral pact craters are a probe into the crust, and hence resolution will be able to resolve the Na line from the studying their features and ejecta may provide insight neighbouring Mg line. In addition, by observing the X- into different compositional layers beneath the surface. ray albedo of the regolith at different phase angles, we The highest albedo areas on Mercury are all associated will be able to probe the fine structure of the soil. This with crater rays (fresh material ejected from impact new technique [4] is being prototyped on DCIXS, an craters) supporting the idea of different compositions X-ray spectrometer due to fly on the SMART-1 mis- and/or maturities being related to impact ejecta. sion to the Moon [5]. There is controversy over the origin of the The Origin and Evolution of Mercury: plains units on Mercury, which could either be of im- There are a number of theories relating to the origin pact origin or of a volcanic nature. The intercrater and evolution of Mercury, relating specifically to its plains are older than smooth plains, since they have a high uncompressed density compared to the other ter- greater crater density, and cover the largest area of all restrial planets. Each theory predicts different compo- the terrains imaged. They show evidence of all the sitions of the present day planet. phases of Mercury’s geological history except the very 1. Selective accretion: This theory predicts that Fe is earliest, and hence are believed to be around 4 billion enriched due to dynamical and mechanical accre- years of age [2]. They therefore represent one of the tion processes in the innermost part of the Solar oldest materials still visible on the surface, and it is of System. In this model, the silicate portion of Mer- great importance to determine their true nature. An X- cury should contain around 3.6-4.5% alumina, 1% ray spectrometer will be able to distinguish between a alkali oxides (Na2O and K2O) and between 0.5 and volcanic and impact origin as it is expected that abun- 6% FeO [6]. MgO is expected to vary between 32 dances of Al and Mg in particular would differ between and 38wt% [7]. the two (Al would be richer in the impact ejecta, Mg 2. Post accretion vaporisation: proposes that the solar richer in the volcanic rocks). Their wide extent over the wind in the early phases of the Sun’s evolution va- whole of the imaged side of Mercury means that only a porised most of the silicate portion of Mercury. In global survey of the planet can obtain a complete pic- this scenario, there should be almost no alkali ox- ture of the nature of these deposits. The smooth plains ides present at all, with very little FeO and a high are much younger and appear to be related to impact enrichment of refractory elements (CaO and basins in the most part. Smooth plains are analogous to Al2O3) to the level of over 30wt%. MgO would Mercury: Space Environment, Surface, and Interior (2001) 8040.pdf X-RAY SCIENCE ON BEPICOLOMBO: S. K. Dunkin, M. Grande and B.J. Kellett also be enriched, with an abundance of 30-40wt% spectra observed at Mercury, on which will be super- [8]. imposed the fluorescent lines which we observe. Lo- 3. Giant impact: a large, planet sized body impacted calised peak emission could be significantly brighter, into Mercury, stripping it of most of its outer sili- since our calculation for Mercury is based on average cate crust and mantle. In this case the FeO content fluxes. Moreover, since all these estimates are based on will be much the same as for the selective accre- a simple scaling of the terrestrial magnetosphere, the tion scenario, but with a depletion in both alkali real situation may be very different. and refractory elements (0.01-0.1% and 0.1-1% The interaction of electrons with the surface will also respectively) (see [3]). produce some line emission. The majority of the en- An important point to note is that these abun- ergy of a 100 keV electron striking the surface goes dances are bulk crust/mantle abundances and therefore into ionisation, and of order 2% ends up as fluores- only a global elemental dataset can fully address the cence. In the case of the Moon there have also been question of which theory most accurately represents the observations of X-rays produced by the high energy present day composition of Mercury. Clearly, many of tail of the solar wind electron striking the surface [17], the important differences are to be seen in elements and energy stored in high charge states of minor ions such as Al, Na, Ca, Fe, and also Mg and K, all of will also be released. It is anticipated that in the case of which can be observed with an X-ray spectrometer that the magnetopause being driven down to the surface of covers the energy range 0.5-10keV and which has suf- Mercury [9], these mechanisms would provide strong ficiently high resolution to resolved such lines emission from the dayside, enabling CIXS to remote (~150ev). sense the global magnetospheric connectivity. Magnetospheric science: Mariner 10 re- Thus, in addition to quantitative surface analysis and vealed the presence of a highly active magnetosphere mapping using the X-ray fluorescence technique, we around Mercury. The field observed is compatible with will also be able to provide valuable insights into the a strong dipole, although higher order terms and magnetospheric precipitation. These comments of anomalies may be more important than for the Earth. course directly imply that very efficient monitoring of Explaining the presence of this field is a highly com- the input solar spectrum is required in order to decon- plex question, which could hinge on establishing the volve the different effects. concentrations of trace elements such as sulphur. While Summary: ESA’s BepiColombo mission and NASA’s the overall picture of the magnetosphere may resemble Mercury Messenger mission will start to unravel many that of the Earth, the end result of space weather effects of the mysteries of Mercury. An X-ray spectrometer on Mercury must be very different. Recently [10] has will provide a vital addition to the instrument comple- presented a model in which the magnetosphere is al- ment of both missions, addressing many of the most most entirely driven, with reconnection on a global important issues reamining about this planet. scale occurring during periods when the interplanetary magnetic field is southward. [11] show images of Na References: [1] Grande M., Dunkin S.K., Kellett emission in the exosphere, which are highly variable, B.J., this volume [2] Strom R.G., Neukum G. (1988), in and may be the footprints of such activity. Mercury, University of Arizona Press [3] Strom R.G., (1997) Mariner 10 found clear signatures of behav- Adv. Space Res., 19, 1471 [4] Muinonen K., et al. (2001) Planetary and Space Science, in press [5] Grande M. et al. iour very reminiscent of terrestrial substorms. Bursts of (2001) Planetary and Space Science, in press [6] Lewis J.S.
Recommended publications
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journey to Mars: How Donna Shirley Broke Barriers for Women in Space Engineering
    The Journey to Mars: How Donna Shirley Broke Barriers for Women in Space Engineering Laurel Mossman, Kate Schein, and Amelia Peoples Senior Division Group Documentary Word Count: 499 Our group chose the topic, Donna Shirley and her Mars rover, because of our connections and our interest level in not only science but strong, determined women. One of our group member’s mothers worked for a man under Ms. Shirley when she was developing the Mars rover. This provided us with a connection to Ms. Shirley, which then gave us the amazing opportunity to interview her. In addition, our group is interested in the philosophy of equality and we have continuously created documentaries that revolve around this idea. Every member of our group is a female, so we understand the struggles and discrimination that women face in an everyday setting and wanted to share the story of a female that faced these struggles but overcame them. Thus after conducting a great amount of research, we fell in love with Donna Shirley’s story. Lastly, it was an added benefit that Ms. Shirley is from Oklahoma, making her story important to our state. All of these components made this topic extremely appealing to us. We conducted our research using online articles, Donna Shirley’s autobiography, “Managing Martians”, news coverage from the launch day, and our interview with Donna ​ ​ Shirley. We started our research process by reading Shirley’s autobiography. This gave us insight into her college life, her time working at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and what it was like being in charge of such a barrier-breaking mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Kevin Gill ‘11G
    InSight: RIVIER ACADEMIC JOURNAL, VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, FALL 2018 EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE: Meet Kevin Gill ‘11G Michelle Marrone (From Rivier Today, Fall 2018) From the comfort of his lab chair in sunny, southern California, Kevin Gill ’11G has a view into outer space. As a Science Data Software Engineer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), he spends his time planning and designing technology in support of environmental science and space exploration, as well as data visualization and planetary imaging. His recent work not only produced the first-ever close views of Saturn, but also contributed to NASA’s team winning an Emmy Award. Kevin earned his M.S. in Computer Science at Rivier and has been designing software to render the unique images he gathers ever since. He used an algorithm he developed during his program at Rivier to generate hypothetical images portraying Mars as a vibrant planet with oceans, an oxygen-rich atmosphere, and a green biosphere. The images went viral and within a week his work was featured on major media networks—Discovery News, Fox News, Universe Today, and the Huffington Post. His work captured NASA’s attention and paved the way for his career move. “Rivier taught me many of the algorithms and development practices I still use today at NASA,” says Kevin. “In fact, I can trace the lineage of code currently running on NASA systems directly to my final master’s project at the University.” The systems and tools he develops support a range of scientists specializing in the areas of climate, oceanography, asteroids, planetary science, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Retroreflectors for Insight and an International Mars Geophysical Network (MGN)
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1492.pdf Laser Retroreflectors for InSight and an International Mars Geophysical Network (MGN). S. Dell’Agnello1, G.O. Delle Monache1, L. Porcelli1,2, M. Tibuzzi1, L. Salvatori1, C. Mondaini1, M. Muccino1, L. Ioppi1, O. Luongo1, M. Petrassi1, G. Bianco1,3, R. Vittori1,4, W.B. Banerdt5, J.F. Grinblat5, C. Benedetto3, F. Pasquali3, R. Mugnuolo3, D.C. Gruel5, J.L.Vago6 and P. Baglioni6. 1Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare–Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (INFN–LNF), Via E. Fermi 40, 00044, Frascati, Italy ([email protected]); 2Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria (UniCal), Via P. Bucci, 87036, Arcavacata di Rende, Italy; 3Agenzia Spaziale Italiana– Centro di Geodesia Spaziale “Giuseppe Colombo” (ASI–CGS), Località, Terlecchia 75100, Matera, Italy; 4Italian Air Force, Rome, Italy, ASI and Embassy of Italy in Washington DC; 5NASA–Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; 6ESA–ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Abstract. There are laser retroreflectors on the Moon, of the INFN-ASI Affiliation-Association to NASA- but there were no laser retroreflectors on Mars until the SSERVI sservi.nasa.gov) is shown in the figure below. NASA InSight mission [1][2] landed and started oper- ating successfully on the surface of the red planet on Nov. 26, 2018. The ESA ExoMars Schiaparelli mis- sion, which unfortunately failed Mars landing in 2016, was carrying a laser retroreflector like InSight [3]. These instruments are positioned by measuring the time-of-flight of short laser pulses, the so-called “laser ranging” technique (for details on satellite/lunar laser ranging and altimetry see https://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov).
    [Show full text]
  • Bepicolombo - a Mission to Mercury
    BEPICOLOMBO - A MISSION TO MERCURY ∗ R. Jehn , J. Schoenmaekers, D. Garc´ıa and P. Ferri European Space Operations Centre, ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT BepiColombo is a cornerstone mission of the ESA Science Programme, to be launched towards Mercury in July 2014. After a journey of nearly 6 years two probes, the Magneto- spheric Orbiter (JAXA) and the Planetary Orbiter (ESA) will be separated and injected into their target orbits. The interplanetary trajectory includes flybys at the Earth, Venus (twice) and Mercury (four times), as well as several thrust arcs provided by the solar electric propulsion module. At the end of the transfer a gravitational capture at the weak stability boundary is performed exploiting the Sun gravity. In case of a failure of the orbit insertion burn, the spacecraft will stay for a few revolutions in the weakly captured orbit. The arrival conditions are chosen such that backup orbit insertion manoeuvres can be performed one, four or five orbits later with trajectory correction manoeuvres of less than 15 m/s to compensate the Sun perturbations. Only in case that no manoeuvre can be performed within 64 days (5 orbits) after the nominal orbit insertion the spacecraft will leave Mercury and the mission will be lost. The baseline trajectory has been designed taking into account all operational constraints: 90-day commissioning phase without any thrust; 30-day coast arcs before each flyby (to allow for precise navigation); 7-day coast arcs after each flyby; 60-day coast arc before orbit insertion; Solar aspect angle constraints and minimum flyby altitudes (300 km at Earth and Venus, 200 km at Mercury).
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • ESA & ESOC Overview
    NASA PM Challenge 2010 Developing the International Program/Project Management Community 9/10 February 2010 Dr. Bettina Böhm Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 1 Used with Permission PURPOSE OF ESA / ACTIVITIES “To provide for and promote, for exclusively Space science peaceful purposes, cooperation among Human spaceflight European states in space research and Exploration technology and their space applications.” Earth observation Launchers [Article 2 of ESA Convention] Navigation ESA is one of the few space agencies Telecommunications in the world to combine responsibility Technology in all areas of space activity. Operations Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 2 ESA FACTS AND FIGURES Over 30 years of experience 18 Member States 2080 staff, thereof 880 in Program Directorates, 790 in Operations and Technical Support and 410 in other Support Directorates 3 500 million Euros budget Over 60 satellites designed and tested Over 60 satellites operated in-flight and 8 missions rescued 16 scientific satellites in operation Five types of launcher developed More than 180 launches made Program & Project Manager Career at ESA | Bettina Böhm | ESA/HQ | 23/11/09 | Page 3 ESA Locations EAC (Cologne) Salmijaervi ESTEC Astronaut training (Noordwijk) Satellite technology development and testing Harwell ESOC ESA HQ (Darmstadt) (Paris) Brussels Satellite operations and ground system technology development ESAC (Villanueva de la Cañada Oberpfaffenhofen
    [Show full text]
  • The New Horizons Spacecraft
    The New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountaina , David Y. Kusnierkiewicz a, Christopher B. Hersmana , Timothy S. Herdera , Thomas B. Coughlin a, William C. Gibsonb , Deborah A. Clancya , Christopher C. DeBoya , T. Adrian Hilla , James D. Kinnisona , Douglas S. Mehoke a, Geffrey K. Ottmana , Gabe D. Rogers a, S. Alan Sternc , James M. Strattona , Steven R. Vernona , Stephen P. Williams a aThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD 20723 bSouth west Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238, cSouth west Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 400, Boulder, CO 80302 Abstract. The New Horizons spacecraft was launched on 19 January 2006. The spacecraft was designed to provide a platform for seven instruments designated by the science team to collect and return data from Pluto in 2015. The design meets the requirements established by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Announcement of Opportunity AO­OSS­01. The design drew on heritage from previous missions developed at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) and other missions such as Ulysses. The trajectory design imposed constraints on mass and structural strength to meet the high launch acceleration consistent with meeting the AO requirement of returning data prior to the year 2020. The spacecraft subsystems were designed to meet tight resource allocations (mass and power) yet provide the necessary control and data handling finesse to support data collection and return when the one­way light time during the Pluto fly­by is 4.5 hours. Missions to the outer regions of the solar system (where the solar irradiance is 1/1000 of the level near the Earth) require a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) to supply electrical power.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y
    The New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y. Kusnierkiewicz, Christopher B. Hersman, Timothy S. Herder, Thomas B Coughlin, William T. Gibson, Deborah A. Clancy, Christopher C. DeBoy, T. Adrian Hill, James D. Kinnison, Douglas S. Mehoke, Geffrey K. Ottman, Gabe D. Rogers, S. Alan Stern, James M. Stratton, Steven R. Vernon, Stephen P. Williams Abstract The New Horizons spacecraft was launched on January 19, 2006. The spacecraft was designed to provide a platform for the seven instruments designated by the science team to collect and return data from Pluto in 2015 that would meet the requirements established by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Announcement of Opportunity AO-OSS-01. The design drew on heritage from previous missions developed at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) and other NASA missions such as Ulysses. The trajectory design imposed constraints on mass and structural strength to meet the high launch acceleration consistent with meeting the AO requirement of returning data prior to the year 2020. The spacecraft subsystems were designed to meet tight resource allocations (mass and power) yet provide the necessary control and data handling finesse to support data collection and return when the one way light time during the Pluto fly-by is 4.5 hours. Missions to the outer regions of the solar system (where the solar irradiance is 1/1000 of the level near the Earth) require a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) to supply electrical power. One RTG was available for use by New Horizons. To accommodate this constraint, the spacecraft electronics were designed to operate on less than 200 W.
    [Show full text]
  • MSL Relay Coordination and Tactical Planning in the Era of Insight, MAVEN, and TGO
    MSL Relay Coordination and Tactical Planning in the Era of InSight, MAVEN, and TGO Rachael Collins, Pegah Pashai, Emma Young, Chris Bennett, Sharon Laubach, Steven Thomas NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 ipe [email protected] Abstract—This study examines an approach for optimizing the TABLE OF CONTENTS scheduling of regular relay communications between the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover and the non-sun-synchronous 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................1 Mars orbiters MAVEN and TGO as well as the impacts of 2. BACKGROUND .......................................2 the approaching InSight landing on MSL relay and tactical planning. Rover operations require knowledge of recently ex- 3. CHALLENGES WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF IN- ecuted activities, termed decisional data, in order to inform SIGHT,MAVEN,&TGO ..........................3 tactical activity planning. As a result, timely and routine data 4. PROCESS AND TOOL IMPLEMENTATION ............5 return is critical for nominal rover operations. Mars orbiters are used as relay assets to achieve such timeliness. They also 5. PLANNING TIMELINE IMPACTS ................... 10 provide greater overall rover data throughput considering their 6. CONCLUSIONS ..................................... 11 larger data transfer capacity between Mars and Earth. Relay opportunities and their performance are thus tightly coupled to APPENDIX ............................................ 11 MSL’s operations efficiency and science return. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................ 11 With InSight landing only 600 kilometers away and at the same REFERENCES ......................................... 12 longitude as MSL, orbiter view periods will be shared between the missions, resulting in fewer relay opportunities for MSL. The introduction of MAVEN and TGO as relay assets helps to 1. INTRODUCTION alleviate this, but the orbit geometries of these spacecraft in- troduce their own challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars
    InSight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars InSight is a robotic scientific explorer to investigate the deep interior of Mars set to launch May 5, 2018. It is scheduled to land on Mars November 26, 2018. It will allow us to better understand the origin of Mars. First Launch of Project Orion Project Orion took its first unmanned mission Exploration flight Test-1 (EFT-1) on December 5, 2014. It made two orbits in four hours before splashing down in the Pacific. The flight tested many subsystems, including its heat shield, electronics and parachutes. Orion will play an important role in NASA's journey to Mars. Orion will eventually carry astronauts to an asteroid and to Mars on the Space Launch System. Mars Rover Curiosity Lands After a nine month trip, Curiosity landed on August 6, 2012. The rover carries the biggest, most advanced suite of instruments for scientific studies ever sent to the martian surface. Curiosity analyzes samples scooped from the soil and drilled from rocks to record of the planet's climate and geology. Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Begins Mission at Mars NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter launched from Cape Canaveral August 12. 2005, to find evidence that water persisted on the surface of Mars. The instruments zoom in for photography of the Martian surface, analyze minerals, look for subsurface water, trace how much dust and water are distributed in the atmosphere, and monitor daily global weather. Spirit and Opportunity Land on Mars January 2004, NASA landed two Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on opposite sides of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Mars Base Camp Youth Guide
    YOUTH GUIDE Getting Started Welcome to your Mars Base Camp expedition! This will be an exciting opportunity for you to explore STEM through an expedition to Mars! Each activity in Mars Base Camp is named for a different mission to Mars as a way to celebrate and explore all that we have learned about the red planet. In this guide we will explore each of the 2020 4-H STEM Challenge activities: • Landing Zone Surveyor • Red Planet Odyssey • Crop Curiosity! • Insight from Mars Here is what you will find in your youth guide: • Quick Guide Activity Sheet for each of the four activities • Fact sheets and extra information that will help you complete your mission • Career connections • Notes page to take notes and write down ideas 2 4-H STEM CHALLENGE Quick Guide for Landing Zone Surveyor In this activity, you'll simulate the experience of arriving at Mars to conduct scientific exploration. Follow the instructions on this page to determine where you land on Mars, or whether you enter into orbit instead. Once you and your teammates know what parts of Mars you'll be exploring, use the Mars Scientist's Notebook on the next page to make observations. Orbit or Entry, Launch, Cruise and Descent Approach Phase and Landing Phase . 1. Lay the Mars map out on the floor and then designate a • Option One: If you went into orbit launch spot 3-5 feet away from the map. Mark the spot (A1, A4, D1 or D4), take the so you remember. Landing Site Card that corre- 2.
    [Show full text]