The Internet, Information and the Culture of Regulatory Change: a Modern Renaissance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Internet, Information and the Culture of Regulatory Change: a Modern Renaissance THE INTERNET, INFORMATION AND THE CULTURE OF REGULATORY CHANGE: A MODERN RENAISSANCE Christopher Paul Boam* The Internet's fundamental characteristics-a * 304 million people have Internet access- borderless, faceless and paperless environment- 45% are in the United States and Canada;' support its seemingly limitless use as a tool for * nearly one-third of U.S. households are reg- business but also present significant challenges. ular Internet users; The same technology that allows the smallest en- * in 1998, the "Internet economy" generated trepreneurs to enter millions of households over $300 billion in total revenue in the throughout the world also subjects them to innu- United States alone; merable, conflicting foreign laws and jurisdic- * "commercial activity" on the Internet is ex- tions, magnifying the legal impact of content er- pected to reach $100 billion in revenues in rors. The ability to enter the households of 1999; millions of unknown persons poses difficult chal- * North American retailers generated $14.9 lenges of identification, privacy and security. And billion in online sales in 1998 and expect at to magnify concerns, once a business "enters" least $36 billion in 1999 (a 145% increase); these households, the opportunity to conclude 0 Internet traffic continues to increase-visi- thousands of transactions without face-to-face tors to retail sites rose 300% in 1998 and on- contact and signed paper contracts raises addi- line retail orders grew by 200%.2 tional issues of transaction validation and authen- Of course, this kind of data changes from tication. It is precisely this "equality of access" to month to month, but updates of both actual and new markets and customers that renders tradi- projected data consistently show ever-increasing tional notions of the relevant "geographic" mar- commercial activity. ket and customer ineffective. The collective im- Out of this ever-increasing growth has come the pact of these peculiar characteristics of the desire for regulation and application of tradi- Internet on traditional notions of business not tional legal notions to a very new paradigm. Op- only offers the greatest opportunities but also ex- ponents of Internet regulation proclaim that horts the most challenging legal issues. neither the law nor its mechanisms of enforce- The Internet's recent effect on traditional busi- ment could hope to keep pace with the techno- ness is due in part to the rapidity of its growth as a logical change of the Internet. True enough, the medium and in part to the potential for business very infrastructure, applications and variations on growth. For a perspective on the Internet's busi- content (and the legal issues that come with those ness potential and consumer reach, consider the variations) have changed greatly since the In- following: ternet was developed by the Advanced Research * Mr. Boam practices administrative and corporate law ITAL ECONOMY, at http://www.esa.doc.gov/de2k.htm (June with a specialization in telecommunications and new technol- 2000). ogy issues. He received his B.S. from the University of Scran- 2 See State of Online Retailing, Summary of Key Findings, ton in 1992 and his J.D. from the Catholic University of SHOP.ORO RESEARCH, at http://www.shop.org/research/sum- America in 1998. Mr. Boam has published articles in many mary.htm (July 1999); Shop.org Releases New Market Figures in a domestic and international journals on the topics of telecom- Study by The Boston Consulting GROUP, SHOP.ORG RESEARCH, at munications and Internet law. Most recently, he published an http://www.shop.org/nr/99/071999.html (July 19, 1999); article titled The Internet and Jurisdiction:International Principles Michele Masterson, Shop. org Suggestionsfor Successful E-Tailing, Emerge But Confrontation Looms, in the JOURNAL OF WORLD IN- E-COMMERCE GUIDE, at http://ecommerce.internet.com (July TELLECTUAL PROPERTY, at 3J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 1 (2000). 1999). 1 See UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, THE Dic- COMMLAW CONSPECTUS [Vol. 9 Projects Agency of the U.S. Defense Department. for companies to identify and respond to cus- To apply law to a virtual environment would be as tomer preferences and demand. However, the fruitless as an attempt to "grasp" a river-once availability of, and access to, customer informa- you place your hand into the flow, the water you tion and the increasing economic value of such 3 grasped is gone. information has raised concerns among consum- The purpose of this paper is twofold. The first ers and regulators regarding the potential for mis- two sections of the article outline legal develop- use of private information. Consequently, the pri- ments regulating content and asserting jurisdic- vacy of customers is a critical issue that any tion over the Internet. The third section of the Internet business must address at the outset. How- paper suggests that Internet regulation is a gras- ever, a few other initial concerns are vital predi- pable "river." Despite the fact that the Internet cates. may never be regulated like a broadcast medium, we can and should try to develop regulations. Any A. The Concern for Privacy Must Begin With attempt to set legal policy for the Internet should Security and Self Regulation be centralized with delegated regulatory tasks closely monitored. Policy-making at the national The technical nature of the Internet medium level should, in the near term, pursue a goal to- poses one of the most potentially difficult chal- ward international standard setting. When you lenges to its utilization. Given that e-commerce is consider the widely divergent ways in which con- dependent on computer-based applications, any tent regulation and jurisdictional notions have de- venture can become mired in issues of content veloped, the second suggestion is likely self-evi- portability, transmission speed and the all-impor- dent. tant element of transactional security. The key to security in business transactions I. REGULATION OF CONTENT IN THE where the customer is unseen is both identifying DIGITAL FRONTIER and then retaining the trust of the customer. The same is true for the Internet. The importance of Information is the basic commodity of the elec- this issue cannot be overemphasized. Most often, tronic superhighway. The key to success in the Internet-based businesses will require first-time emerging electronic marketplace will be a com- customers to enter basic information about them- pany's ability to gather and utilize information selves, at the very least: a username, a password from and about its customers quickly and effi- (to use the system with your username in the fu- ciently. Such data is a prerequisite for conducting ture) and an e-mail address. Once the customer e-commerce. Traditional face-to-face verification decides to perform a transaction on the site, the techniques, such as hand-checking credit cards, business typically requests additional information, driver's licenses or signatures are unavailable. In including name, address, phone number and the absence of any cash transactions, the identifi- method of payment. With the privilege of asking cation of customers and authentication of transac- consumers for this information comes the obliga- tions and payments become even more impor- tion to ensure the security of the information tant. The collection and use of customer from unwanted use or intrusion. Internet business information also offer tremendous opportunities security issues are commonly divided among hard- 3 For instance, in one attempt to visually represent the tion, CAIDA also has developed a tool for viewing an infra- breadth and speed of global Internet connectivity, the Coop- structure map of multiple Internet backbone providers si- erative Association for Internet Data Analysis ("CAIDA"), a multaneously and for "updating and correcting that may be cooperative nonprofit research organization, published a invalid or out of date." COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR IN- graphical representation-a "snapshot"-of the Internet TERNET DATA ANALYSIS, ABOUT MAPNET, at http://www.caida. core taken from data collected during a 16-day period in Jan. org/tools/visualization/mapnet/Backbones (last updated 2000. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNET DATA ANALY- Aug. 7, 2000). With the assistance of various backbone prov- SIS, VISUALIZING INTERNET TOPOLOGY AT A MACROSCOPIC iders supplying data and information on their trunk routes, SCALE, at http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as-core_ the Mapnet software will overlay all routes or select routes network (last updated Jan. 19, 2001). The visualization is a individually on a world map. Id. The lack of high-speed composite of 220,533 Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses routes connecting to mid-Asia, Africa and southern South (374,013 links and 154,104 target destination IP addresses) America gives a stark representation of who are the "haves" from paths obtained in the merger of three separate sets of and "have-nots" with regard to high-speed Internet connec- data. Id. In addition to the graphical topology representa- tivity. 20011 The Internet, Information and the Culture of Regulatory Change ware (physical security concerns) and privacy con- in early 2000, federal law enforcement authorities cerns. increasingly sought the help of computer profes- Among the hardware-related security issues to sionals to combat "cyber-assaults." Following the consider are: securing the web server 4 and busi- incursion of the "Love bug" virus, which brought ness data, securing transactional information (be- down computer networks across the globe in tween the server and consumer), and in some April 2000, a special multination session in Paris cases, securing the consumer's computer or net- was convened to discuss Internet security and co- work. Security risks to e-commerce run the gamut operative enforcement.9 All countries participat- from "eavesdropping" and "packet sniffing" of ing in the conference, including the United transactional data,5 to cracking passwords and ex- States, Japan, Russia, France, Great Britain, Swe- ploiting system flaws by hackers.
Recommended publications
  • Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL32114 Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress Updated January 29, 2008 Clay Wilson Specialist in Technology and National Security Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress Summary Cybercrime is becoming more organized and established as a transnational business. High technology online skills are now available for rent to a variety of customers, possibly including nation states, or individuals and groups that could secretly represent terrorist groups. The increased use of automated attack tools by cybercriminals has overwhelmed some current methodologies used for tracking Internet cyberattacks, and vulnerabilities of the U.S. critical infrastructure, which are acknowledged openly in publications, could possibly attract cyberattacks to extort money, or damage the U.S. economy to affect national security. In April and May 2007, NATO and the United States sent computer security experts to Estonia to help that nation recover from cyberattacks directed against government computer systems, and to analyze the methods used and determine the source of the attacks.1 Some security experts suspect that political protestors may have rented the services of cybercriminals, possibly a large network of infected PCs, called a “botnet,” to help disrupt the computer systems of the Estonian government. DOD officials have also indicated that similar cyberattacks from individuals and countries targeting economic,
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Citizen Should Know About DRM, A.K.A. “Digital Rights Management”
    What Every Citizen Should Know About DRM, a.k.a. “Digital Rights Management” By Mike Godwin Senior Technology Counsel Public Knowledge PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION What Every Citizen Should Know About DRM, a.k.a. “Digital Rights Management” By Mike Godwin Senior Technology Counsel Public Knowledge NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION Washington, DC Acknowledgements This “DRM primer” would not have come about without the author’s having worked with an informal “Risks of Copy Protection” expert group that includes Ed Felten, Matt Blaze, Phil Karn, Steve Bellovin, Bruce Schneier, Alan Davidson, John Morris, Hal Abelson, and Bill Cheswick. Two members of the group — Ed Felten and Matt Blaze — deserve special thanks for framing a number of copy-protection technology issues with such clarity that I have to some extent reproduced that clarity here. Phil Karn similarly deserves special thanks for his discussion of the extent to which peer-to-peer file-sharing is a feature of the Inter- net’s fundamental design. Andy Moss and Aaron Burstein each made a wide range of helpful comments and observations on earlier drafts of this primer. I’m particularly grateful to my boss, Gigi Sohn, for giving me the opportunity to explore the landscape of digital rights management and to develop further some of my ideas about the directions in which DRM may take us. I’m also thankful for the support and feedback of my other fellow staff members at Public Knowledge — Sarah Brown, Alex Curtis, Ann Dev- ille, and Nathan Mitchler. I consider myself fortunate to be backed by such a knowledgeable and resourceful team; each of my colleagues contributed in many ways to the development of this project, and all of them read this paper in various stages of development and offered helpful corrections and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidden Feeds: Government Controls on Social Media in China
    FORBIDDEN FEEDS Government Controls on Social Media in China 1 FORBIDDEN FEEDS Government Controls on Social Media in China March 13, 2018 © 2018 PEN America. All rights reserved. PEN America stands at the intersection of literature and hu- man rights to protect open expression in the United States and worldwide. We champion the freedom to write, recognizing the power of the word to transform the world. Our mission is to unite writers and their allies to celebrate creative expression and defend the liberties that make it possible. Founded in 1922, PEN America is the largest of more than 100 centers of PEN International. Our strength is in our membership—a nationwide community of more than 7,000 novelists, journalists, poets, es- sayists, playwrights, editors, publishers, translators, agents, and other writing professionals. For more information, visit pen.org. Cover Illustration: Badiucao CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION : AN UNFULFILLED PROMISE 7 OUTLINE AND METHODOLOGY 10 KEY FINDINGS 11 SECTION I : AN OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP 12 The Prevalence of Social Media Usage in China 12 Digital Rights—Including the Right to Free Expression—Under International Law 14 China’s Control of Online Expression: A Historical Perspective 15 State Control over Social Media: Policy 17 State Control over Social Media: Recent Laws and Regulations 18 SECTION II: SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN PRACTICE 24 A Typology of Censored Topics 24 The Corporate Responsibility to Censor its Users 29 The Mechanics of Censorship 32 Tibet and
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND NAPSTER: Copyright, Fair Use, Intellectual Property Collide in Cyberspace E-Mal for Life!
    Stanf- yer BEYOND NAPSTER: Copyright, Fair Use, Intellectual Property Collide in Cyberspace e-mal for life! www.stanfordalumni.org ired ofhaving to send your new e­ Tmail address to family and friends every time you change your provider? Avoid the hassle by signing up today for a permanent Stanford Alumni Association (SAA) e-mail account Best of all, it~ FREE! Here's what you'll get: It's as easy as 1-2-3. • An address that's easy to remember Log on to www.stanfirdalumni.org-useyour OStanford ill number (above your name on [email protected] the Stanfird Lawyer mailing label) • 24/7 access to your mail on the C1 After you've signed up, you might want to Web-great when you're traveling ~ update your address in the SAA online • Automatic forwarding to your Alumni Directory to let your friends know where you are. Just click on "Update Your every-day account-keep current Profile." This directory is a great resource. with classmates and friends ~ Contact your Law School friends Ii:.I and classmates frequently ... They'll be glad and so will you. www.stanfordalumni.org SUMMER 2001 / ISSUE 60 Contents Features ,------------------------------_e 14 BEYOND NAPSTER By Doug Fine Copyright, Fair Use, and Intellectual Property Collide in Cyberspace P2P networking technology has revolutionized file swapping, but now new business models are emerging to beat down the legal challenges faced by upstarts like PROFESSOR Napster. Here's what the experts LAWRENCE LESSIG ----1------111IIII--------- see in our digital future. I 20 ELECTION REVIEW By Mel Taylor Stanford Law School was very well represented during Election 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Liberties and Security in Cyberspace
    Hoover Press : Cyber DP5 HPCYBE0500 06-11-:1 11:53:04 rev1 page 183 CHAPTER 5 Civil Liberties and Security in Cyberspace Ekaterina A. Drozdova Measures to protect information systems against cyber attacks are receiving increasing attention as the threat of attacks grows and the nature of that threat is better understood. Among these measures are sophisticated technologies for monitoring computer networks and us- ers, detecting intrusion, identifying and tracing intruders, and preserv- ing and analyzing evidence, all discussed in the previous chapter. What legal standards should govern the use of these measures? What non- technical constraints are likely to be placed, or ought to be placed, on them? What importance should be assigned to these constraints in designing and implementing technologically robust solutions, as well as international agreements to facilitate law enforcement? Specific answers to these questions will ultimately be determined Hoover Press : Cyber DP5 HPCYBE0500 06-11-:1 11:53:04 rev1 page 184 184 Ekaterina A. Drozdova by evaluating the specific measures or agreements proposed. But cer- tain legal principles are broadly applicable, including the right to pri- vacy, the protections against self-incrimination and unwarranted searches and seizures, and the right to due process of law. These civil liberties are supported in international law and guaranteed in varying forms by the national laws and institutions of many countries. An international regime against cyber crime and terrorism must operate within the constraints of these principles, as defined by the legal frame- works of its States Parties. There is often a tension between protecting civil liberties and en- forcing laws to maintain public safety and order.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in the Digital
    Downloaded by [University of Liverpool] at 09:13 03 November 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE Downloaded by [University of Liverpool] at 09:13 03 November 2016 Downloaded by [University of Liverpool] at 09:13 03 November 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE Edited by Mathias Klang and Andrew Murray Downloaded by [University of Liverpool] at 09:13 03 November 2016 First published in Great Britain 2005 by The GlassHouse Press, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London WC1X 9PX, United Kingdom Telephone: + 44 (0)20 7278 8000 Facsimile: + 44 (0)20 7278 8080 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cavendishpublishing.com Published in the United States by Cavendish Publishing c/o International Specialized Book Services, 5824 NE Hassalo Street, Portland, Oregon 97213-3644, USA Published in Australia by The GlassHouse Press, 45 Beach Street, Coogee, NSW 2034, Australia Telephone: + 61 (2)9664 0909 Facsimile: +61 (2)9664 5420 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cavendishpublishing.com.au © Cavendish Publishing Ltd 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of Cavendish Publishing Limited, or as expressly permitted by law, or under the terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Cavendish Publishing Limited, at the address above. You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdictional Analysis Formatted
    Jurisdictional Analysis Comparative Study Of Intermediary Liability Regimes Chile, Canada, India, South Korea, UK and USA in support of the Manila Principles On Intermediary Liability Version 1.0, 1 July 2015 Authors and Affiliations Jyoti Panday (Programme Officer) Centre for Internet and Society, India J. Carlos Lara (Research and Policy Manager) Derechos Digitales, Chile Kyun S Park (Professor) Korea University Law School; (Director) Open Net, Korea Kelly Kim (General Counsel) Open Net, Korea Acknowledgements The author would like to the inputs and feedback of Rishabh Dara, Jeremy Malcolm, Gabrielle Guillemin, Shradha Nigam, Elonnai Hickok, Pranesh Prakash and Sunil Abraham. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this analysis. Funding Research, authorship, and/or publication of this article and the development of the Principles has been generously funded by a grant from MacArthur Foundation. Permissions The author has sought permission from the Steering Committee developing the Manila Principles and members who have contributed to this analysis. Corresponding Author Jyoti Panday, Centre for Internet and Society Top Floor, G-15 Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 INDIA Email: [email protected] jURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS - MANILAPRINCIPLES.ORG 1 Abstract Governments around the world undertake speech regulation through the imposition of liability on intermediaries for third-party content, and often impose related obligations of proactive monitoring, exercising due diligence, and other such requirements. This study highlights the trends and crucial differences in existing liability regimes across Chile, Canada, India, South Korea, UK and USA. This analysis has been undertaken by the steering committee developing the Manila Principles and is aimed at supporting the development of the Manila Principles - a global civil society initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of a Balance Between Police Power and Privacy in the Cybercrime Treaty D.C
    Richmond Journal of Law and Technology Volume 9 | Issue 1 Article 5 2002 In Search of a Balance Between Police Power and Privacy in the Cybercrime Treaty D.C. Kennedy Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/jolt Part of the Computer Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation D.C. Kennedy, In Search of a Balance Between Police Power and Privacy in the Cybercrime Treaty, 9 Rich. J.L. & Tech 3 (2002). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/jolt/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Richmond Journal of Law and Technology by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume IX, Issue 1, Fall 2002 In Search of a Balance Between Police Power and Privacy in the Cybercrime Treaty by D.C. Kennedy[*] Cite As: D.C. Kennedy, In Search of a Balance Between Police Power and Privacy in the Cybercrime Treaty , 9 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 3 (Fall 2002), at http://jolt.richmond.edu/v9i1/article3.html. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. THE PROBLEM OF CYBERCRIME A. Cybercrime and the Cybercriminal B. The New Tools of the Cybercriminal C. Challenges for Law Enforcement III. TREATY ON CYBERCRIME A. Draft 19: The First Publicly-Released Version of the Cybercrime Treaty B. The Outcry C. Draft 27: The Final Revision to the Treaty IV. EXAMPLES OF PRIVACY PROTECTIONS PROVIDED UNDER DOMESTIC LAWS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cybersmear Or Cyber-SLAPP: Analyzing Defamation Suits Against Online John Does As Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
    COMMENT Cybersmear or Cyber-SLAPP: Analyzing Defamation Suits Against Online John Does as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Joshua R. Furman* A recent advertising campaign by a national Internet Service Provider (ISP) depicts a happy home of consumers who never have to leave their house thanks to their super-fast connection and the won- ders of limitless shopping on the web. Television spots show people in awe over the selection and convenience as they click away at laptops purchasing kitchen appliances, trading stocks, and occasionally greet- ing a courier with the latest treat materializing from their online ad- ventures. In some ways these ads are a fanciful depiction of our cur- rent reality. While many of us have felt the excitement of a dot com shipment just a few clicks away, the seamless function of technology and infrastructure depicted is probably a bit more idealized than we would recall. However, as we move closer to a society in which online activities increasingly usurp real world activities, we must ask whether fundamental rights will follow. Consider the problem of John Doe, a member of our utopian cy- ber-shopping household, who wants to comment on a web forum * J.D. Candidate 2002, Seattle University School of Law. Innumerable thanks are due to the staff of Seattle University Law Review whose commitment to enriching the legal community through exceptional scholarship is unparalleled. Many individuals have been of indispensable assistance in transforming this article from scraps on my hard drive to a printed reality. I would particularly like to thank Deirdre Mulligan and Alan B.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Governance
    AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNET GOVERNANCE Jovan Kurbalija 5th Edition i The history of this book is long, in Internet time. The original text and the overall approach, including the five-basket methodology, were developed in 1997 for a training course on Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Policy for government officials from Commonwealth countries. In 2004, Diplo published a print version of its Internet governance materials, in a booklet entitled Internet Governance – Issues, Actors and Divides. This booklet formed part of the Information Society Library, a Diplo initiative driven by Stefano Baldi, Eduardo Gelbstein and Jovan Kurbalija. Special thanks are due to Eduardo Gelbstein, who made substantive contributions to the sections dealing with cybersecurity, spam, and privacy, and to Vladimir Radunovic and Ginger Paque who updated the course materials. Comments and suggestions from other colleagues are acknowledged in the text. Stefano Baldi, Eduardo Gelbstein, and Vladimir Radunovic all contributed significantly to developing the concepts behind the illustrations in the book. In 2008, a special, revised version of the book, entitled simply An Introduction to Internet Governance, was published in cooperation with NIXIIndia on the occasion of the Internet Governance Forum 2008 held in Hyderabad, India. In 2009, a revised third edition was published in the cooperation with the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology of Egypt Internet Governance. The fourth edition (2010) was produced in partnership with the Secretariat
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom on the Net 2009
    0100101001100110101100100101001100 110101101000011001101011001001010 011001101011001001010011001101011 0010010100110011010110010010100110 011010110010010100110011010110100Freedom 101001100110101100100101001100110 1011001001010011001101011001001010on the Net 0110011010110010010100110011010110 0100101001100110101101001010011001 1010110010010100110010101100100101a global assessment of internet 0011001101011001001010011001101011and digital media 0010010100101001010011001101011001 0010100110011010110100001100110101 1001001010011001101011001001010011 0011010110010010100110011010110010 0101001100110010010100110011010110 0100101001100110101101000011001101 0110010010100110011010110010010100 1100110101100100101001100110101100 1001010011001101011001001010011001 1010110100101001100110101100100101 0011001101011001001010011001101011 0010110010010100101001010011001101 0110010010100110011010110100001100 1101011001001010011001101011001001 0100110011010110010010100110011010 1100100101001100110101100100101001 1001101011010010100110011010110010 0101001100110101100100101001100110 1011001001010011001101011001001010 FREEDOM ON THE NET A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media April 1, 2009 Freedom House Freedom on the Net Table of Contents Page Overview Essay Access and Control: A Growing Diversity of Threats to Internet Freedom .................... 1 Freedom on the Net Methodology ........................................................................................................... 12 Charts and Graphs of Key Findings ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law on the Internet and in the Wider Digital World Law on the Internet and the Wider Digital Environment
    The rule of We exercise a significant part of our human rights today using the and in the wider digital world on the Internet rule of law The law on the Internet and the wider digital environment. But our human rights can also be breached using these very same means. Internet and There is general agreement that human rights should be enjoyed online as they are offline. In practice, however, the actors who can ensure that we enjoy human rights are not exactly the same in the in the wider two environments. In particular, the disproportionate influence and control that certain states and certain private companies exercise on the Internet and its physical infrastructure at the global level, are two digital world essential elements of this difference. This issue paper looks at how the rule of law can be maintained in an environment characterised by these specific governance issues, focusing on some policy areas of particular human rights relevance: freedom of expression, data protection and privacy, cybercrime and national security. It suggests possible ways forward to ensure that we can trust the rule of law to apply to our online activities. www.commissioner.coe.int 70114 ENG PREMS ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading Issue paper human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of which are members of the European Union. All Council of Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The European Court of Human Rights oversees the implementation of the Convention in the member states.
    [Show full text]