Understanding Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays” (Keynote Presentation) at 3DSA (Three-Dimensional Systems and Applications) Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 19-21 May 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays” (Keynote Presentation) at 3DSA (Three-Dimensional Systems and Applications) Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 19-21 May 2010 Woods, A.J. (2010) “Understanding Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays” (Keynote Presentation) at 3DSA (Three-Dimensional Systems and Applications) conference, Tokyo, Japan, 19-21 May 2010. www.AndrewWoods3D.com Understanding Crosstalk in Stereoscopic Displays Andrew Woods Centre for Marine Science & Technology Curtin University of Technology Perth, Australia A.Woods @ curtin.edu.au Abstract— Crosstalk is a critical factor determining the image Looks like a double exposure. Crosstalk is a physical entity quality of stereoscopic displays. Also known as ghosting or and can be objectively measured, whereas ghosting is a leakage, high levels of crosstalk can make stereoscopic images subjective term.” hard to fuse and lack fidelity; hence it is important to achieve low levels of crosstalk in the development of high-quality stereoscopic Ghosting: “The perception of crosstalk is called ghosting.” displays. In the wider academic literature, the terms crosstalk, Huang, et al [2] provide the following definitions: ghosting and leakage are often used interchangeably but it would be helpful to have unambiguous descriptive and mathematical System Crosstalk: “for the left-eye case … can be defined definitions of these terms. The paper reviews a wide range of as: mechanisms by which crosstalk occurs in various stereoscopic displays, including: time-sequential on PDPs and CRTs System crosstalk (left eye) = β2 / α1 (1) (phosphor afterglow, shutter timing, shutter efficiency), MicroPol describing the degree of the unexpected leaking image from the LCDs (polarization quality, viewing angle), time-sequential on other eye.” Where: “α1 describes the percentage part of the LCDs (pixel response rate, update method, shutter timing & left-eye image observed at the left eye position”, and “β efficiency), autostereoscopic (inter-zone crosstalk), polarised 2 projection (quality of polarisers and screens), anaglyph (spectral describes the percentage part of the right-eye image leaked to quality of glasses and displays). Crosstalk reduction and the left-eye position.” crosstalk cancellation are also discussed along with methods of Viewer Crosstalk: “means the crosstalk perceived by the measuring and characterising crosstalk. viewer [7].” It is “defined as the ratio of the luminance of unwanted ghost image, which leaks from the image for the Keywords - crosstalk; ghosting; leakage; LCD; PDP; CRT; other eye, to the luminance of the correct information received DLP; polarised; anaglyph, stereoscopic, autostereoscopic. by the viewer’s eyes. The viewer crosstalk for the viewer’s left eye can be defined as: I. INTRODUCTION Viewer crosstalk = B β / A α ” (2) This paper provides an overview of the concepts of 2 1 crosstalk (sometimes ‘cross talk’, or ‘cross-talk’ [37]) in Where: A is the luminance of a particular point in the left eye stereoscopic 3D displays, including a review of the image, and B is the luminance of the same corresponding point terminology relating to stereoscopic crosstalk as it is in (same x,y location) in the right-eye image. common usage, a review of the sources of ghosting in a Therefore, System Crosstalk is independent of the content, selection of commonly used stereoscopic displays, and a whereas Viewer Crosstalk varies depending upon the content. discussion of methods of measuring, characterising and reducing stereoscopic crosstalk. There is some similarity between Lipton’s “Crosstalk and Ghosting” vs. Huang’s “System Crosstalk and Viewer In its simplest form crosstalk in stereoscopic displays is the Crosstalk” definitions but there are still some notable leakage of the left image channel into the right eye view and differences, specifically “ghosting” includes any perception vice versa. issues, whereas Huang’s “viewer crosstalk” only considers co- location image contrast [7] and not the amount of disparity [6]. II. TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS Stevens [34] provides a slightly different definition for The terms crosstalk and ghosting are often used viewer crosstalk: “the ratio of luminance of the ‘wrong’ image interchangeably in some of the published literature and to the luminance of the ‘correct’ image as seen by the observer. unfortunately very few publications actually provide a It will be a function of the image contrast and the disparity.” descriptive or mathematical definition of these terms. Unfortunately when definitions are provided they are This paper will not provide recommendations on sometimes contradictory: terminology usage, but perhaps this can happen after further literature search and industry-wide debate. Lipton [1] provides the following definitions: Crosstalk: “Incomplete isolation of the left and right image channels so that one leaks (leakage) or bleeds into the other. Three other terms which have been used when referring to III. PERCEPTION OF CROSSTALK crosstalk are: The perception of crosstalk in stereoscopic displays has Leakage: in very general terms this refers to the raw been studied widely [6][7][8][9][10][11]. It is widely amount of light which leaks from one channel to another – but acknowledged that the presence of high levels of crosstalk in a it is usually undefined in the literature. stereoscopic display are detrimental. The effects of crosstalk in an image include: ghosting and loss of contrast, loss of 3D Extinction and extinction ratio: usually refer to the ratio effect and depth resolution, and viewer discomfort [34]. between the intensity of the intended image as compared with the intensity of the unintended image – but it is usually not The visibility of crosstalk (ghosting) increases with specifically defined in the stereoscopic literature. increasing contrast and increasing binocular parallax of the image [6][9][21] (see Fig. 1). For example, a stereoscopic 3D contrast: the inverse of 3D crosstalk [32]. image with high-contrast will exhibit more ghosting on a particular stereoscopic display than will an image with low A. Mathematical Definitions contrast. In addition to equations (1) and (2) provided above, a The literature provides various advice on the amounts of selection of other mathematical definitions appear in the crosstalk that are acceptable and unacceptable – but literature: unfortunately not all the advice agree. Some examples include Liou, et al [22] provides the following equations: [36]: “crosstalk between 2 and 6% significantly affected image quality and visual comfort”, “crosstalk should be as low as CL = (BW – BB) / (WB – BB), and (3) 0.3%” [6], “crosstalk. … visibility threshold of about 1 to 2%”, CR = (WB – BB) / (BW – BB) (4) “crosstalk level of about 5% is sufficient to induce visual Where: WB = a video stream with all white as left-eye discomfort in half of the population” [8]. images, and all-black as right-eye images, BW = a video stream with all-black as left-eye images and all-black as right IV. MEASUREMENT OF CROSSTALK eye images, BB = a video stream with all-black for both left Two methods exist for the measurement of crosstalk: and right eyes (i.e. the black level of the display), and CL and CR = the crosstalk experienced by the left eye and the right A. Optical Sensors eye. An optical measurement device (such as a photometer or a Pala, et al [10] and Boher, et al [32] use something very radiometer) can be used to measure crosstalk. Examples of similar to the above but with different variable names. sensors that have been used to measure crosstalk include: Integrated Photomatrix Inc. IPL10530 DAL photo-diode [12], Woods and Harris [40] and Hong, et al [31] used a simpler Ocean Optics USB2000 spectroradiometer [39], Minolta equation: CS1000 spectroradiometer [31][34], Minolta CS-100 spot Crosstalk (%) = leakage / signal 100 (5) chroma meter [7][22], and Eldim EZContrastMS [32]. Many other devices can also be used for this purpose. It is important Shestak, et al [21] provide equations for dark crosstalk, to note that for any optical sensors that are used, consideration light crosstalk, and grey-to-grey crosstalk specifically relating needs to be given to how well the spectral sensitivity of the to crosstalk in time-sequential 3D on LCDs: sensors match the spectral sensitivity of the human eye (Fig. 2). dark Dark crosstalk C = (W’2 – W2) / (W1 – W2) (6) Traditionally, crosstalk is measured by displaying full- Light crosstalk Clight = (W’ – W ) / (W – W ) (7) black and full-white in opposing eye-channels of the display 1 1 2 1 and using an optical sensor to measure the amount of leakage Where: W1 and W2 are the original desired luminance for between channels. For example, the optical sensor is placed at points in the left and right eye view (W1 is the lower of the two the left eye position (either behind the left eye of 3D glasses, or luminances), W’1 is the displayed luminance affected by in the left eye viewing zone for an autostereoscopic display) crosstalk which brightens the image, and W’2 is the displayed luminance affected by crosstalk which darkens the image. Grey-to-grey crosstalk is the matrix of values of C for all grey level combinations for W1 and W2. Additionally, Boher, et al [32] define 3D contrast as: 3D 0.5 CL = 1 / χL , CR = 1 / χR and C = (CR × CL) (8,9,10) Where: CL and CR are 3D contrast for the left and right eyes as viewed through the left and right filters, χL and χR is the 3D crosstalk for left and right eyes, and C3D is the combined 3D contrast for both eyes. Note that the variable name C is used for contrast in [32] whereas C is used for Crosstalk in most other stereoscopic papers. Figure 1. The threshold of visibility of crosstalk for different amounts of disparity and image contrast ratio. [6] Due to the limitations of the visual measurement charts, appropriate electro-optic tools should be used when high accuracy crosstalk data is needed. V. CROSSTALK MECHANISMS There are various mechanisms by which crosstalk occurs in stereoscopic displays and these mechanisms vary between different stereoscopic display technologies. The sections below summarise the important performance attributes for various stereoscopic display technologies and the mechanisms by which crosstalk occurs in each.
Recommended publications
  • ISA - EPIC/PIDA Online Technology Meeting On
    ISA - EPIC/PIDA Online Technology Meeting on Mini/Micro LED March 25th, 2021 Time: 16:00-19:00 (Beijing Time) (25 March 9:00–12:00 CET) online events @ Zoom platform link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81348588620?pwd=dUNUeEZBWXZJS05yL3VCR0FVNDg2UT09 Meeting ID: 813 4858 8620 Password: 029869 Simultaneous interpretation will be provided Micro -LED will bring interruptive changes to many fields such as wearable/implantable optoelectronic devices, light communication/light interconnection, medical treatment, smart car lights, spatial imaging and so on, and become the mainstream product of the next generation of information display. In recent years, various research and development around Mini /Micro-LED manufacturing and application has been vigorously carried out, and a number of technical issues have been tackled continuously. Related applications in the fields of display, light-based data communication technology, biology and medical treatment have been gradually developed. ISA established the Micro-LED Committee in 2020, aiming promote innovation, exchange research and development results, promote the connection between upstream and downstream of this industry, wider rollout the latest applications, and contribute to form a global Mini / Micro-LED industrial chain as well as to foster a good industrial eco-system. In order to strengthen the cooperation between China and Europe in Mini /Micro-LED manufacturing, learn from each other, exchange innovation results, promote complementary industrial advantages and seek business opportunities, ISA and EPIC will jointly hold the Mini /Micro-LED Industry Development (Online) Seminar. Experts from well-known companies in China and Europe will be invited to discuss practical technical issues and share their solutions in Mini/Micro-LED manufacturing and application.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat Panel Displays in Perspective
    Flat Panel Displays in Perspective September 1995 OTA-ITC-631 GPO stock #052-003-01438-6 Cover Photo Credit: Plasmaco, Inc. Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Flat Panel Displays in Perspective, OTA-ITC-631 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1995). oreword lat panel displays (FPDs) are increasingly important in this informa- tion-intensive era. Compared with the cathode ray tube used in televi- sions, FPDs are thin, lightweight, and power efficient. These displays have enabled the development of portable computers and commu- nication devices. Applications in automobiles and offices will increase, and FPDs may eventually result in the fabled television-on-the-wall. FPDs repre- sent a large and rapidly growing industry worldwide, and are expanding into an increasingly diverse set of systems. American companies and researchers have made many of the key innovations in FPDs, but U.S. firms hold a very small share of the world market. Some observers have called for government intervention to strengthen the U.S. industry. One area of concern—access to displays for military use—has driven recent federal support for FPDs. Flat Panel Displays in Perspective examines the potential benefits of a do- mestic, high-volume, FPD industry for the nation, and evaluates the role of government policies in developing it. The report concludes that such an in- dustry would provide both economic and national security benefits. The ex- tent of these benefits is difficult to determine, however, largely because trends in technology development and industry structure are resulting in more displays at declining prices.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Latest Display Technologies and Their Usage for Various Special Applications
    Journal of Radio and Television Broadcast Volume 3 Issue 3 An Overview of Latest Display Technologies and their Usage for Various Special Applications 1Dr. Vandana Khare, 2N. K. Shreyas 1Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India 1Research Scholar, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, JNT University, Hyderabad, India 2B. tech II year, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India Email: 1vandanakhare@cmrcet.org, 2shreyaskrishna88@gmail.com DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2153526 Abstract In the new world of technology, due to its volatile nature there had been immense changes in the display technology since the past few years. Now it is that when portability plays an important role, the electronic displays of various electronic devices have changed their trend from being heavy and thicker in size to more light and thin in dimensions. This significant change in the dimensions of the electronic displays is due the adoption of AMOLED and Active QLED technology. AMOLED [Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode] is a display technology used in smartphones, mobile devices, laptops and television. A Quantum Dot Display is a display device that uses Quantum dots (QD), semiconductor nanocrystals which can produce pure monochromatic red, green, and blue light. Hence, with the use of these display technologies the manufacturing and usage of flexible and foldable electronic displays have come into existence with low power consumption and low cost, brighter colors with wide color gamut. Also by using this AMOLED and AQLED technology in the latest electronic displays, it is possible to control each and every pixel of the particular display so that, the possibility of manipulating the saturation, brightness, contrast and especially sharpness of the image or the picture increases.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2018 A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education Matthew Hackett University of Central Florida Part of the Anatomy Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact STARS@ucf.edu. STARS Citation Hackett, Matthew, "A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6408. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6408 A REVIEW AND SELECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 3D DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES FOR ANATOMICAL EDUCATION by: MATTHEW G. HACKETT BSE University of Central Florida 2007, MSE University of Florida 2009, MS University of Central Florida 2012 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Modeling and Simulation program in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2018 Major Professor: Michael Proctor ©2018 Matthew Hackett ii ABSTRACT The study of anatomy is complex and difficult for students in both graduate and undergraduate education. Researchers have attempted to improve anatomical education with the inclusion of three-dimensional visualization, with the prevailing finding that 3D is beneficial to students. However, there is limited research on the relative efficacy of different 3D modalities, including monoscopic, stereoscopic, and autostereoscopic displays.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Display Technologiess
    VARIOUS DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIESS Mr. Virat C. Gandhi1 1Computer Department, C. U. Shah Technical Institute of Diploma Studies Abstract—A lot has been invented from the past till now in regards with the display technologies. It gives an immense life to electronic device when good display technology are being used. Now a days displays are coming in various sizes for different portable devices like smart phones, tablets, smart watch, televisions, laptops etc. People are expecting better display no matter what device they use. In this paper I have given an overview of some of the past technologies to the technologies till now. Flat-panel displays use Liquid-crystal display (LCD) technology to make them much lighter and thinner when compared with a traditional monitor. A liquid crystal display consists of an array of tiny segments (called pixels) that can be manipulated to present information. Plasma panels, also called gas discharge displays, are constructed by filling the region between two glass plates with a mixture of gases that usually include neon. In LED, A matrix of diodes is arranged to form the pixel positions in the display, and picture definition is stored in refresh buffer. OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) technology relies on the organic materials. Keywords— Display Technology; LCD; LED; Flexible display; Curved display; I. INTRODUCTION In today’s smart world, people are carrying smart devices all over the places they visit. Wherever people are they are surrounded or accompanied by display devices, such as smart phones, tablets, notebooks and advertising screens. Different devices uses different display technologies to enrich devices facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Holographic Video Using Fibre Display : a Survey
    International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking Vol. 13, No. 2s, (2020), pp. 100–105 3D Holographic Video Using Fibre Display : A Survey Sarode Shyamli S.1, Hankare A.P.2 , Shirude Pratik V.3, Vibhute Prasad A.4 1Student of B.E, Department of E&TC, SKNCOE, SPPU,Pune 2Assistant Professor Department of E&TC, SKNCOE, SPPU, Pune 3,4Student of B.E, Department of E&TC, SKNCOE, SPPU, Pune 1shyamlisarode@gmail.com 2aphankare.skncoe@sinhgad.edu 3pratik.shirude.5050@gmail.com 4prasadvibhute98@gmail.com Abstract In past centuries, Holographic video plotting is done using point source technology and projectors which is very costly having complex setup [1], Here we are displaying video on the pyramid shaped fibre using the python language having simple setup. Holography is nothing but upgraded level of photography and conventional film and its three-dimensional nature makes it completely new possibilities for future use. Through this project we are trying to help display products, objects, and animated sequences three-dimensionally. 3D Holography is different from conventional film on a standard screen. 3D hologram is visible from all sides, so the observer can walk around the hologram, enabling an absolutely realistic-looking image to form.A video which is to be displayed will be processed. While processing, the image will be dimensionally split in such a way that after it's reflection on the fibre, it could be seen from all sides. The dimensions of the fibre being used will be required to be aligned with that of the image for proper display. The methodology we are using in this project is Reflection Holography using Geometric Transformation [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Display Technologies Focusing on Power Consumption
    Sustainability 2015, 7, 10854-10875; doi:10.3390/su70810854 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Review Review of Display Technologies Focusing on Power Consumption María Rodríguez Fernández 1,†, Eduardo Zalama Casanova 2,* and Ignacio González Alonso 3,† 1 Department of Systems Engineering and Automatic Control, University of Valladolid, Paseo del Cauce S/N, 47011 Valladolid, Spain; E-Mail: maria.rodriguez.fernandez@gmail.com 2 Instituto de las Tecnologías Avanzadas de la Producción, University of Valladolid, Paseo del Cauce S/N, 47011 Valladolid, Spain 3 Department of Computer Science, University of Oviedo, C/González Gutiérrez Quirós, 33600 Mieres, Spain; E-Mail: gonzalezaloignacio@uniovi.es † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: ezalama@eii.uva.es; Tel.: +34-659-782-534. Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 16 June 2015 / Accepted: 4 August 2015 / Published: 11 August 2015 Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the main manufacturing technologies of displays, focusing on those with low and ultra-low levels of power consumption, which make them suitable for current societal needs. Considering the typified value obtained from the manufacturer’s specifications, four technologies—Liquid Crystal Displays, electronic paper, Organic Light-Emitting Display and Electroluminescent Displays—were selected in a first iteration. For each of them, several features, including size and brightness, were assessed in order to ascertain possible proportional relationships with the rate of consumption. To normalize the comparison between different display types, relative units such as the surface power density and the display frontal intensity efficiency were proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Display Devices
    ELEKTRONIKOS ĮTAISAI 2009 1 DISPLAY DEVICES VGTU EF ESK stanislovas.staras@el.vgtu.lt ELEKTRONIKOS ĮTAISAI 2009 2 Display devices Display devices are used for the visual presentation of information. 1. Analog display devices (cathode-ray tubes) • Oscilloscope tubes •TV CRTs 2. Digital display devices • LED (including OLED) displays • VF (vacuum fluorescent ) displays • LCD (liquid crystal) displays • Nixie tube displays and PDPs (plasma display panels) • Electroluminescent displays (ELDs) 3. Others: • Electronic paper • Using principles of nanoelectronics (carbon nanotubes, nanocrystals) • Laser TV VGTU EF ESK stanislovas.staras@el.vgtu.lt ELEKTRONIKOS ĮTAISAI 2009 3 Classification of electronic information technologies with high information content; highlighted technologies are treated in this article w4.siemens.de/.../heft2_97/artikel08/index.html VGTU EF ESK stanislovas.staras@el.vgtu.lt ELEKTRONIKOS ĮTAISAI 2009 4 Display devices Electronic display devices based on various principles were developed. Active display devices are based on luminescence. Luminescence is the general term used to describe the emission of electromagnetic radiation from a substance due to a non-thermal process. Luminescence occurs from a solid when it is supplied with some form of energy. Photoluminescence arises as a result of absorption of photons. In the case of cathodoluminescence material is excited by bombardment with a beam of electrons. Electroluminescence is a result of excitation from the application of an electric field. Fluorescence persists for a short lifetime of the transition between the two energy levels. Phosphorescence persists for much longer time (more than 10-8 s). Passive display devices reflect or modulate light… VGTU EF ESK stanislovas.staras@el.vgtu.lt ELEKTRONIKOS ĮTAISAI 2009 5 Display devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Compatibility of Display Products with Stereoscopic Display Methods
    Compatibility of Display Products with Stereoscopic Display Methods Andrew J. Woods Centre for Marine Science & Technology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845 AUSTRALIA. ABSTRACT The “underlying technique” is usually based on a Stereoscopic Imaging is coming of age – new method of coding and decoding the multiple high-resolution stereoscopic displays and related stereoscopic views in the same light field – these stereoscopic equipment are readily available, and a can be colour, polarisation, time, and/or spatial wide range of application areas is making use of separation. Summarised below are the main stereoscopic imaging technologies. Unfortunately, stereoscopic display methods which are currently new display products are not always compatible used in commercial displays: with existing stereoscopic display methods. This paper discusses the compatibility of current display TIME-SEQUENTIAL (FIELD-SEQUENTIAL) products with various stereoscopic display In this method, left and right perspective images methods. are shown alternately (sequentially) on the same display surface. The observer wears a pair of liquid INTRODUCTION crystal shutter (LCS) 3D glasses whose lenses Many stereoscopic specific display products are switch on and off in synchronisation with the left now readily available in the marketplace. Vendors and right perspective images shown on the display include Sharp, StereoGraphics, Opticality (formerly such that the left eye only sees the left perspective X3D), SeeReal, Dimension Technologies Inc. (DTI), images and the right eye only sees the right VREX, Christie Digital, Barco, and many others. A perspective images. wide range of supporting stereoscopic compatible This method is more commonly known as ‘field- hardware and software is also readily available for sequential’ or ‘frame-sequential’ because it is a creating, transmitting, storing, and serving the sequence of fields or frames.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Display • the Journal of Data Display Technology
    whatever your computer says ... Volume9 Number6 November/December 1972 Information Display • The journal of Data Display Technology PANEL DISPLAYS I") I ') I.J \ll z ,-. "t V l -J SELF-SCAN Panel Display Subsystem, 256"Ch.aracter . 7 0 t M t ix Characters 0.25 Htgh. ~:?c~~;~~~e~ lor~at, !~ailable with all drive ele_ctronics including memory, character generator, and ttmmg. Whether it's a police officer. mapa. 1 ~o 1ca r requestingd. t s informa-for h·t t speclfymg coor ma e lion on a suspect, an arc I ~clding or a type setter verifying type plumbing fixtures m a ne;E~~-SCAN panel displays guarantee for a mall-order catalogf f data between the operator and the most accurate trans er o uter dis lay and demand the computer. If yo~ ne~d a ~o~tw the le:d of Kustom Electronics error-free commun l cat~~n~, oce Accessories Corporation (1) in Chanute, Kansas, Cle ~ i Ke boards (3) in (2) in Southport, .connectlcdu:;,:~~~ ~th:r SELF-SCAN panel Belleview, Washmgton, an salesman demonstrate his displa.y a why the SELF-SCAN panel us~rs. H~ve Bu.~r~u~'~lssee Circle Reader Service Ca rd No. 25 a bnefcaffse .t. oman/machine interface device d"teisprmmlay ~ISlm th e most e ec lve available today. Burroughs Corpora t1.on, Electronic Components Division, Burroughs Plainfield, New Jersey 07061 . (201) 757-3400. ~~ A Technology Publ ishing Corp. Publicat ion Volume9 Number6 November/December 1972 Information Display The journal of Data Display Technology The Sykes 2220 Cassette Tape Controller receives, stores and transmits data between termi­ nals and communications lines all day long.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Flat Panel Display Technology and Applicability to ATCS On-Board Terminals
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1314 69 Advances in Flat Panel Display Technology and Applicability to ATCS On-Board Terminals CHUCK J. KARBOWSKI, GIDEON BEN-YAACOV, AND DAVID BLASS The introduction of Advanced Train Control Systems (ATCS) to plication does not exist. Each of the available display tech­ the railroad industry changed the way operational information is nologies has some limitations with its environmental and visual communicated to locomotive crews. Voice communication can specifications. Nevertheless, flat panel display screens are now be supplemented and may eventually be replaced by data considered the most suitable display screens for locomotive communication via intelligent display terminals. Flat panel dis­ play screens are well suited for locomotive display terminals; the A TCS applications because they are ruggedized and compact. screens are compact and have the potential of being able to sustain Depending on the environmental and visual specification reliable operation in harsh environments such as those found on requirements considered by a railroad to be the most impor­ board locomotives. In choosing flat panel display screens for lo­ tant, a compatible display technology can be identified. Such comotive applications, a number of factors must be considered: a display technology will have superior capabilities with those how the various flat screen display technologies operate, what features considered most important, but also may have lim­ their technical features are, and how they respond to harsh en­ vironmental conditions. Although no perfect display screen exists itations in areas considered Jess important. for locomotive A TCS applications, a comparison of strengths and A review of the various types of flat panel display tech­ weaknesses of the various technologies currently available points nologies, with detailed feature comparisons, is given below.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat Panel Display Technologies and Domestic Firms A
    Appendix A: Flat Panel Display Technologies and Domestic Firms A any technologies are used to create flat panel displays (FPDs). Some were developed years ago and fill small market niches; others have been brought to the stage of M mass manufacturing and are now mature products; still others have yet to be commercialized, but promise superior per- formance and lower costs, compared with current technology. Nu- . merous domestic firms are pursuing FPD technologies; most are small firms that focus on one or a few display approaches, but larger firms have also expressed interest. The distinguishing char- acteristic of the domestic FPD industry is the absence of high-vol- ume manufacturing (see table A-1 for an overview of FPD technologies and domestic firms). Chapter 3 outlined three potential strategies available to do- mestic FPD firms seeking a larger role in the global industry: 1) expand niche markets using established technologies; 2) catch up to leading-edge active matrix liquid crystal display (AMLCD) production; and 3) develop new leapfrog technologies. The fol- lowing sections describe the technology choices associated with each approach, and place the activities of domestic firms into this framework. ESTABLISHED TECHNOLOGIES: LCD, EL, PLASMA Two of the oldest FPD technologies are liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and emissive displays. LCDs are the primary example of transmissive FPDs, which modulate an external light source. Emissive flat panel displays use materials that emit light when an electric field is applied, through phenomena
    [Show full text]