PMTA Scientific Review: Technical Project Lead (TPL)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PMTA Scientific Review: Technical Project Lead (TPL) U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993 www.fda.gov PMTA Scientific Review: Technical Project Lead (TPL) SUBMISSION INFORMATION Applicant 22nd Century Group, Inc. Product Manufacturer NASCO Products, LLC Submission Date December 4, 2018 FDA Receipt Date December 4, 2018 Cross-referenced Cross-referenced STN Primary STN(s) Submission1 (b)(4) Applies to all STNs NEW TOBACCO PRODUCTS PM0000491: Moonlight ®2 Product Category Cigarettes Product Sub-Category Combusted, Filtered Package Type Hard pack Package Quantity 20 per pack Characterizing Flavor None Length 83 mm Diameter 7.9 mm Ventilation 13% PM0000492: Moonlight ® Menthol2 Product Category Cigarettes Product Sub-Category Combusted, Filtered Package Type Hard pack Package Quantity 20 per pack Characterizing Flavor Menthol Length 83 mm Diameter 7.9 mm Ventilation 13% 1 The application contains a valid and active cross-reference, which contains appropriate authorization for the applicant to reference the entire file or certain sections thereof. 2 On December 4, 2018, FDA received original PMTAs for VLN™ King and VLN™ Menthol. On October 2, 2019, the applicant submitted a proposed name change for the products to Moonlight and Moonlight Menthol, respectively. The scientific reviews reflect the proposed names (VLN™ and VLN™ Menthol) in the original PMTA submissions. STN PM0000491 – PM0000492 Page 2 of 89 DISCIPLINES REVIEWED Primary Reviewer(s) DATE OF REVIEW Behavioral and Clinical Pharmacology Kia Jackson October 29, 2019 Chemistry An Vu October 29, 2019 Environmental Science Rudaina Alrefai-Kirkpatrick October 29, 2019 Engineering Robert Meyer October 30, 2019 Epidemiology Joanne Chang October 29, 2019 Medical Anna-Sophie Weidner October 30, 2019 Microbiology Prashanthi Mulinti October 30, 2019 OCE – BIMO Tara Singh October 30, 2019 OCE – Manufacturing/Lab Eugene Chang October 30, 2019 OCE – DPAL Matthew Rohit October 30, 2019 Social Science Katherine Margolis October 29, 2019 Statistics Chunfeng Ren October 30, 2019 Toxicology Jonathan Fallica October 31, 2019 Recommendation Issue marketing order letters Issue denial letters Technical Project Lead (TPL): Iilun C. Murphy -S 2019.11.20 15:52:43 -05'00' Iilun Murphy, M.D. Director Division of Individual Health Science, Office of Science Signatory Decision: ☒ Concur with TPL recommendation and basis of recommendation ☐ Concur with TPL recommendation with additional comments (see separate memo) ☐ Do not concur with TPL recommendation (see separate memo) Digitally signed by Matthew R. Holman - S Date: 2019.11.22 16:13:51 -05'00' Matthew R. Holman, Ph.D. Director Office of Science STN PM0000491 – PM0000492 Page 3 of 89 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 6 2. REVIEW OF PMTAS ............................................................................................. 11 2.1. Regulatory History .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2. Product Composition, Design, and Manufacturing ......................................................................... 13 2.2.1. Tobacco Ingredients ................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2. Non-tobacco Ingredients ............................................................................................................................ 16 2.2.3. Product Design ........................................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.4. Manufacturing, Process, and Controls ....................................................................................................... 21 2.2.5. FDA Sample Testing .................................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.6. Product Stability ......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.7. Inspections of Manufacturing Facilities ...................................................................................................... 24 2.2.8. Summary of Composition, Design, and Manufacturing Findings ...............................................................24 2.3. Toxicological Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................ 25 2.3.1. Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) ............................................................................ 25 2.3.1.1. General Overview ......................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.1.2. ISO Regimen HPHC Data ............................................................................................................... 26 2.3.1.3. CI Regimen HPHC Data ................................................................................................................. 27 2.3.1.4. Comparison Between VLN™ Cigarettes and SPECTRUM Research Cigarettes .............................29 2.3.2. Nonclinical Studies and Literature Search .................................................................................................. 31 2.3.3. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) .......................................................................................................... 31 2.3.4. Summary of Toxicological Findings ............................................................................................................ 32 2.4. Individual Health Impact ................................................................................................................ 34 2.4.1. Overview of Behavioral and Clinical Pharmacology (BCP) Studies .............................................................34 2.4.2. Nicotine Pharmacokinetics ......................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.3. Behavioral Pharmacology ........................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.3.1. Abuse Liability ............................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.3.2. Use Behavior and Topography...................................................................................................... 39 2.4.3.3. Product Use/Consumption ........................................................................................................... 40 2.4.3.4. Craving, Withdrawal, and Dependence ........................................................................................42 2.4.3.5. Cessation ...................................................................................................................................... 45 2.4.4. Summary of Overall Behavioral and Clinical Pharmacology Findings.........................................................46 2.4.5. Biomarkers of Exposure (BOE).................................................................................................................... 47 2.4.5.1. Effect of Switching to VLNC Cigarettes on BOE ............................................................................47 2.4.5.2. Dual Use and Non-compliance ..................................................................................................... 48 2.4.5.3. Summary of BOE Findings ............................................................................................................. 49 2.4.6. Biomarkers of Potential Harm (BOPH) ....................................................................................................... 50 2.4.7. Adverse Health Effects ............................................................................................................................... 51 2.4.7.1. Health Risks to Non-Users ............................................................................................................ 52 STN PM0000491 – PM0000492 Page 4 of 89 2.4.7.2. Consumer Use and Potential Misuse ............................................................................................52 2.4.7.3. Health Risks Associated with Polyuse ........................................................................................... 52 2.4.7.4. Health Risks Associated with Switching to this Product Compared to Continued Smoking .........53 2.4.7.5. Health Risks Associated with Switching to this Product Compared to Tobacco Cessation ..........53 2.4.7.6. Health Risks Associated with Switching to Product Compared to Cessation Medication ............54 2.4.7.7. Summary of Adverse Health Effects .............................................................................................54 2.4.8. Likelihood of Product Misuse or Malfunction ............................................................................................ 54 2.4.9. Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Inspection ............................................................................................... 55 2.4.10. Summary of Individual Health Findings ...................................................................................................... 55 2.5. Population Health .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mo on Lig Ht B Ay & Con N N Ected Wetlan Ds
    NORTHEAST - 8 MOONLIGHT BAY & CONNNECTED WETLAND TYPES Jennifer Webster, Thomas Meyer Lowland hardwood swamp, coniferous swamp, shrub carr, coniferous bog, open bog, fen, marsh, sedge meadow, ridge and swale ECOLOGY & SIGNIFICANCE species, comprises many former beach ridges separated by DOOR wet swales that are characterized by rich marsh, bog and COUNTY This Wetland Gem site encompasses a corridor of highly • coniferous swamp habitat. Toft Point, a mile-wide peninsula significant wetland complexes that nearly span the Door along the Lake Michigan coast hosts extensive calcareous Peninsula. This site includes Ephraim Swamp, Baileys sedge meadow that grades into shrub carr and coniferous Harbor Swamp, Ridges Sanctuary State Natural Area, swamp dominated by white cedar with occasional paper Toft Point State Natural Area and Mud Lake State Natural birch and black ash. Many rare plant species grow at this Area. From the extensive forested wetlands of Ephraim site, including spoon-leaf moonwort. - and Baileys Harbor Swamps that form an important ecological corridor across the peninsula to the ridge and This Wetland Gem also hosts a diversity of animals, swale topography on a series of former Lake Michigan particularly migratory birds. Bird species recorded at the site beach ridges at Ridges Sanctuary, these wetlands are include osprey, bald eagle, great blue heron, green heron, extremely diverse and ecologically valuable. This site marsh wren, sedge wren, swamp sparrow, American bittern, supports a tremendous concentration of rare plants and yellow-bellied flycatcher, blue-headed vireo, Caspian tern, animals, including the federally endangered Hine’s emerald common tern, pied-billed grebe, mallard, ring-necked dragonfly. duck, northern pintail, blue-winged teal, Virginia rail and at least 17 species of warblers.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements The County Comprehensive Planning Committee Ashland County Staff Gary Mertig Jeff Beirl George Mika Tom Fratt Charles Ortman Larry Hildebrandt Joe Rose Emmer Shields Pete Russo, Chair Cyndi Zach Jerry Teague Natalie Cotter Donna Williamson Brittany Goudos-Weisbecker UW-Extension Ashland County Technical Advisory Committee Tom Wojciechowski Alison Volk, DATCP Amy Tromberg Katy Vosberg, DATCP Jason Fischbach Coreen Fallat, DATCP Rebecca Butterworth Carl Beckman, USDA – FSA Haley Hoffman Gary Haughn, USDA – NRCS Travis Sherlin Nancy Larson, WDNR Stewart Schmidt Tom Waby, BART Funded in part by: Funded in part by the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office for Coastal Management Under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Grant #NA15NOS4190094. Cover Page Photo Credit: Ashland County Staff Table of Contents: Background Section Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Housing ................................................................................................................................................ 2-6 Transportation .................................................................................................................................. 3-24 Utilities & Community Facilities ..................................................................................................... 4-40 Agricultural, Natural & Cultural Resources ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Fields Used from MPCA Delta Database
    Appendix A Fields used from MPCA Delta Database Appendix A. Fields used from MPCA Delta Database Facility Permit Number Contact Name Phone Address 1 Address 2 City Name Zip Code Design Flow Contact Role County First DMR State Population Served Public SIC Code SIC Name Watersheds Major Treatment Type Domestic Major Watershed Major Drain ID Permit Number Station ID Start Date End Date Reported Value Limit ID Concentration ID Analyte ID Datasource ID units ID Converted P Value Permit Number Station ID Local Name Subwatershed Number Subwatershed Discharge Watershed Major Drain Latitude Longitude Appendix B Industrial Phosphorus Data Matched to MNPRO Database by NAICS Appendix B. Industrial Phosphorus Data Matched to MNPRO Database by NAICS ID Facility Name City P_kgd Permit_No employee_count NAICS Code 5592 Bridges Medical Center Ada 0.12 MN0021709 100 622110 5593 Ada Co-op Oil Assn Ada 0.01 MN0021709 81 325320 5594 Norman, County of Ada MN0021709 72 921190 5595 Ada-Borup School District Ada MN0021709 67 611110 5596 Ada, City of Ada 0.04 MN0021709 29 921100 5597 Specialty Feed Products Co Ada MN0021709 25 311100 5598 Lee Bros. Sales Inc Ada MN0021709 24 441100 5599 Loretel Systems Inc Ada MN0021709 24 517100 5600 Norman County Implement Inc Ada MN0021709 22 333200 5601 Prairie Dental Center Ada MN0021709 22 621200 5602 Ada Feed & Seed Co Ada 0.41 MN0021709 21 311900 5603 Kelly's Chrysler Center Inc Ada MN0021709 20 441100 5604 Ralph's Food Pride Ada MN0021709 19 445100 5605 Ada Produce Co Ada MN0021709 17 424400 5606 Wild Rice Dining Emporium
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California
    Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California by Michael L. Blum Date: Approved: Dr. Michael K. Orbach, Adviser Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University May 2015 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. STUDY APPROACH: A TOTAL ECOLOGY OF SURFING ................................................. 5 2.1 The Biophysical Ecology ...................................................................................................... 5 2.2 The Human Ecology ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baileys Harbor Boreal Forest & Wetlands
    #284 BBaaiilleeyyss HHaarrbboorr BBoorreeaall FFoorreesstt && WWeettllaannddss S T A T E N A T U R A L A R E A Location: Door County. T30N-R28E, Sections 2, 11, 14. T31N-R28E, Section 35. 434 acres. Access: From the intersection of State Highway 57 and County Highway Q north of Baileys Harbor, go northeast on Q 3.5 miles to Cana Island Road, then go south (right) 0.1 mile. Park along the road at the T intersection where Cana Island Road splits to form a triangle. Walk south along Cana Island Road 0.3 miles, then east into the natural area. Look for SNA signs marking the site’s boundary. Description: Baileys Harbor Boreal Forest and Wetlands contains a unique and diverse landscape, influenced by the local climate along the northeastern coast of the Door Peninsula. Cooler springs and summers, warmer falls and winters, and reduced evaporation rates have allowed northern species and a boreal forest to thrive here, far south of their normal range. Balsam fir and white spruce dominate the forest, which grades into northern wet-mesic forest of white cedar, white pine, paper birch, and hemlock. Many orchids and rare plants find refuge in the forest, including the federally-threatened dwarf lake iris (Iris lacustris). The natural area protects over 1.5 miles of undeveloped Lake Michigan shoreline. An extensive alkaline rockshore, or bedrock beach, is exposed during periods of low lake levels. Bird’s-eye primrose (Primula mistanssinica), small fringed gentian (Gentianopsis procera), and tufted hair grass (Deschampsia cespitosa) are among the uncommon species thriving on the open dolomite (limestone) flats.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Significant Places of the Northern Lake Michigan Coastal
    14.01 M I C H I G A N 14.2 Ecologically Significant Places of 14.0414.05 A .0 14.03 the Nor5thern Lake Michigan Coastal 413 GT Scale: 1:850,000 NQ 14.02 Wisconsin Transverse Mercator NAD83(91) Map NLMC5 - ams 14.18 14.1714.13979 A . 561 MR 0 8 14.21 CI 47 218 MR 14.06 PS 381 12 14.12 TR204 PE CS 13 125 15.02 SB 14.114.11 17 284 SB 31345.1357 L A K E M I C H I G A N MF 14.14 560 2L3P4R 544 15.04 14.09 14.15 563 PH 543 377 175 GBWS 5W5S9 OM 14.08 559 OR 14.16 515 NE WS Y 14.07 RD A 129 B 14.22 N 39 E E R LB SU G 8.03 A.07 8.04 101 8.01 LWR Significant EcologicaA l Places The significant ecological places depicted on this map originate from several .0 Ecological Landscape 6 different plans that identify areas of the state that are ecologically important based Land Legacy Places County Boundaries on criteria described in those plans. Land Legacy Places were identified in the Important Bird Areas Protected Land* Wisconsin Land Legacy Report (2006): http://dnr.wi.gov/ search 'land legacy'. Conservation Opportunity Areas were identified in Wisconsin's Wildlife Action State Natural Areas Native American Land Plan Implementation Report (2008): http://dnr.wi.gov/ search 'wildlife action plan'. Important Bird Areas were identified in Important Bird Areas of Wisconsin (2007): Conservation Opportunity Areas Open Water http://www.wisconsinbirds.org/iba/IBA-book.htm Terrestrial Cities or Villages Protected Lands include most State, Federal and County ownership or easements as well as lands owned or managed by land trusts and NGOs such as The Nature River Systems Conservancy and others.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Employment of Panoramic Scenery in the Nineteenth- Century Theatre
    This dissertation has been 62-824 microfilmed exactly as received WICKMï^, Richard Carl, 1929- AN EVALUATION OF THE EMPLOYMENT OF PANORAMIC SCENERY IN THE NINETEENTH- CENTURY THEATRE. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1961 Speech—The ate r University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan AN EVALUATION OF THE EMPLOYMENT OP PANORAMIC SCENERY IN THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY THEATRE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Richard Carl Wickman, A. B., B, D., M. A. ******** The Ohio State University 1961 Approved by ^ Adviser Department of Speech TABLE OP CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION................................... 1 The Era of the P a n o r a m a ..................... 1 The Purpose and Scope of the Study.......... 3 Terminology ................................. 6 Panorama................................... 6 Diorama ................................... 7 Panoramic exhibitions ..................... 7 Panoramic scene settings................... 7 Sources and Limitations ..................... 8 II. THE HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PANORAMA .......... 12 Introduction.......... 12 Earliest Precedents ......................... l6 Landscape Painting........................... 24 Realism, Illusion, and Mechanized Exhibitions............. ’................. 29 S u m m a r y ..................................... 38 III. THE INVENTION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT OP THE PANORAMA................................. 39 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Moonlight: Milwaukee Public Library Ship Information and Data Record
    The Moonlight: Milwaukee Public Library ship information and data record. [s.l.]: [s.n.], [s.d.] https://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/N7RBBPFGQ3PIL8Q http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ The libraries provide public access to a wide range of material, including online exhibits, digitized collections, archival finding aids, our catalog, online articles, and a growing range of materials in many media. When possible, we provide rights information in catalog records, finding aids, and other metadata that accompanies collections or items. However, it is always the user's obligation to evaluate copyright and rights issues in light of their own use. 728 State Street | Madison, Wisconsin 53706 | library.wisc.edu . MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY Name MOONLIGHT Ship Information and Data Record Official No. 90719 BUILT: 4874 at Milwaukee, WI %y Wolf & Davidson r David Vance et al Rig Sch-3 masted !lull Wood OPERATING DATA DIMENSIONS ENGINES BOILERS GR.T 777 NETT. 738 _ Type Type LENGTH ere 205.9 BEAM 33.6 DRAFT 14.2 Cul & St No No. SIZE CENTERS . Cap HP. Size: Rev pice COMPARTMENTS No. Built by: Built by Cap. About 1500 tons Year built: Year built: HISTORY: One of the finest wooden top sail schooners on the Lakes. Her lower main mast was 105 feet high. She was in the grain, coal and ore trade. About the middle 1880's, she was made a tow barge. About the fall of 1888, she was sold to William S. Mack et al. of Cleveland, and towed behind the str. CHARLES J. KERSHAW in the coal and ore trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Imaging on the Great Lakes to Locate Deep
    UNDERWATER IMAGING ON THE GREAT LAKES TO LOCATE DEEP WRECKS SARAH BRAULIK MAY 4, 2007 A SENIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE ABSTRACT Commercial Shipping on the Great Lakes began in 1679 with the arrival of the Griffon; the history of Great Lakes shipwrecks began with this same ship in the same year when she failed to reach port after setting sail out of Washington Island for Niagara. Since this first foundering, there have been an estimated 10,000 shipwrecks on the Great Lakes. The current method for locating these shipwrecks has been to do library research to determine a search area and then use side-scan sonar to locate the ship within that given area. Once the wreckage has been located, SCUBA divers descend on the site to identify the ship. Unfortunately, this method only works within the depths that a person can safely descend and ascend, roughly 400 feet, a relatively small portion of the Great Lakes. Recent technological advances in underwater imaging and sonar has made it possible to explore shipwrecks at depths beyond that which a person equipped with SCUBA gear can withstand, but this technology has not yet been utilized on the Great Lakes. This thesis will explore these new technologies and how they would be beneficial in the location, identification, and mapping of Great Lakes shipwrecks located in deep water. 2 INTRODUCTION On November 17, 1958 the Carl D. Bradley departed for Rogers City, Michigan for what was supposed to be a thirty hour trip.
    [Show full text]
  • June 30, 1881
    j § m i m $ # + A REPUBLICAN NEWSPAPER I have opened a Furniture Repair Shop in J.F. HAHN’S BUILDING BUCHANAN PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY and am prepared to do all wort In that line ----BT---- on short notice. J O H N Gr- H O L M E S . Billiard TaBle Repairin g ----- AND----- * Cerm s;-8I.oO per Year. A l l Kinds of Job Work t^TPiLTABXXIH ADVAHC1.“S » done to order. Yonrpatronage is solicited NUMBER 21. OF f ICS.—In Uecord Baildine, Oak Street. VOLUME XV. BUCHANAN, BERRIEN'COUNTY, MICHIGAN, THURSDAY, JUNE 30, 1881. WM., A- EATON. Business Directory. KwmBusiness Directory MISCELLANEOUS. VKRSELETS. “It is along, long story, condense it the first time, commencing with “ Old SENSE AND NONSENSE. President Garfield, being interview­ l HAYDEX REA, manufacturer and dealer in W iv a of great men all remind ns as I may, and perhaps It is best that I Hickory’s:” Paris has but one lady physician. ed by a delegation of straight Repub­ '• Light and Heavy Harness, Saddles, RoBes, do not attempt to relate it.” SOCIETIES. C W e can suBlimate onr wives, W ash ington, D.C., June 9,1831. licans of Virginia, declared in support­ HARDWARE. Blankets, Dusters, Nets, Whips, Trunks, Satchels, I had already heard enough to be­ “Hades-oh!” is the new telephone Brushes and ComBs. No dry goods or groceries. If-weTl only ere departing. M rs. M a r y W il l ia m s :—I remember ing the party which was opposed to T O. O. F.—Bnchanan Lodge Xo.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship-Breaking.Com Information Bulletins on Ship Demolition, # 19 - 22 from January 1St to December 31St, 2010
    Ship-breaking.com Information bulletins on ship demolition, # 19 - 22 from January 1st to December 31st, 2010 Robin des Bois 2011 Ship-breaking.com Bulletins of information and analysis on ship demolition 2010 Content # 19, from January 1st to April 4th …..……………………….………………….…. 3 (The crisis is over, the twilight of tankers, Onyx the worst, Tor Anglia the best, a failure in the United States) # 20, from April 4th to July 1st ….…..……………………..……………….……..… 34 (Ship-breaking in Mauritania, Ship-breaking across the Globe, The car ferry scandal) # 21, from July 2nd to October 15th …..………………….…..…………….……… 78 (Bangladesh, United States, Africa, India and Turkey in the Spotlight Sagafjord / Saga Rose - The END) # 22, from October 16th to 31 Decembre 31st ……………..…………….……… 121 (The agony of the Azzurra, Piracy and demolition, Mauritania - follow up, France, Global statement 2010, Thorgaut / Guard Valiant - The END) Information and analysis bulletin April 21, 2010 on ship demolition # 19 January 1st to April 4th 2010 Ship-breaking.com Between January 1st and April 4th 2010, 233 ships were sent to be demolished. The rhythm remains elevated, with 18 ships per week. In number of ships to be demolished as well as tonnage, India, with 120 ships (42%), remains destination number 1 before Bangladesh with 55 (24%), Pakistan with 25 (11%), and China with 23 (9%). The accumulated demolition will permit the recycling of nearly 2 million tons of metal. The crisis is over ! The prices offered by the demolition yards have significantly increased and continue to increase in the yards of the Indian subcontinent, but also in China; they have reached $400, even $500 for oil tankers and more for ships containing stainless steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience WISCONSIN 2020 Edition
    PLUS: A “Midwest Indie” Weekend in Eau Claire | Must-See Museums | Sweet Sips from Cideries experience WISCONSIN 2020 Edition From tame to totally wild Get this view only one place. HIGH CLIFF STATE PARK Push yourself to the edge as you explore High Cliff’s easy-to-moderate hiking trails offering stunning lake views. Discover centuries-old effigy mounds, part of the park’s intriguing history. At High Cliff, one-of-a- kind adventure and awe meet as you tower above the northeastern shore of Lake Winnebago — Wisconsin’s largest inland lake. Live on the edge at For more Originals stories, visit this Fox Cities Original, and find your original. foxcities.org/originals. 2020 Edition | experiencewisconsinmag.com | 3 visit VIENNA THE MOST Insta-Worthy EXIT IN WISCONSIN • EXIT 126 Discover your Summer Sanctuary visitviennawi.com FOLLOW US! PLAN YOUR GETAWAY | ELKHARTLAKE.COM | (877)-355-4278 visit VIENNA THE MOST Insta-Worthy EXIT IN WISCONSIN • EXIT 126 visitviennawi.com FOLLOW US! YOU ARE HERE WE MAKE IT HAPPEN. YOU MAKE IT HOME. Lake Superior Serving Wisconsin families since 1946 ENJOY THE BEAUTY TRANQUIL FRENCH COUNTRY Bayfield Apostle Superior Islands OF LAKE MICHIGAN RETREAT ON 33 ACRES BRULE Washburn RIVER STATE Ashland Lake Brule Nebagamon FOREST 2 13 Montreal Hurley Solon Springs CHEQUAMEGON Gile Flowage St. Croix Mellen M ICHIGAN Flowage Lake Owen 53 Turtle Cable Namekagon Flambeau Mercer Lake 77 63 Clam Flowage Lake R. Manitowish NORTHERN North Arrow a Trout Na Nelson L. m w Lake HIGHLAND ek Hayward NATIONAL e $2,500,000 ag p $1,795,000 o ip STATE n Round L.
    [Show full text]