00364 Final Report 7-1-02

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

00364 Final Report 7-1-02 MIDDLE BOULDER CREEK WATER SOURCE MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN BOULDER, COLORADO Prepared by the Water Resources Staff of the Utilities Division of the city of Boulder, with support from: GEI Consultants, Inc. Brown & Caldwell Hydrosphere Resource Consultants ERO Resources Corp. Western Environmental Analysts GBSM Steven P. Walker Kris Kranzush Version 1, July 23, 2002 Project 00364 MIDDLE BOULDER CREEK WATER SOURCE MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN BOULDER, COLORADO July 23, 2002 Submitted to: City of Boulder 1739 Broadway Boulder, CO 80306 Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 6950 South Potomac Street, Suite 200 Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 662-0100 Project 00364 _______________________________________ Curtis A. Thompson, P.E. Project Manager _______________________________________ Richard A. Westmore, P.E. Senior Project Advisor GEI Consultants, Inc., Project 00364, 07/18/02 00364 Final Report (7-1-02).doc Version 1, June 20, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background On March 7, 2001, the city of Boulder purchased Barker Dam, Barker Meadow Reservoir, the Barker Gravity Pipeline, Kossler Reservoir, the pipeline from Kossler Reservoir to Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Plant, and the Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Plant from Xcel Energy (Public Service Company of Colorado) for $12.4 million. Combined, the purchased facilities and the accompanying land constitute the Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project (Barker system). Boulder purchased the Boulder Canyon Hydroelectric Project using a portion of the proceeds from the sale of Windy Gap Project units in 1991. All remaining funds from the Windy Gap sale will be used to repair and upgrade the Barker system. The main purpose for the purchase of the these facilities was to enhance Boulder’s municipal water supply and to allow the city to make necessary repairs to the Barker system. Boulder’s Management Priorities The primary purpose of Barker Meadow Reservoir is to store Boulder’s municipal water for delivery to Boulder’s Betasso Water Treatment Plant. Boulder’s municipal water supply goals are to provide an adequate, reliable, high quality water supply for Boulder’s present and projected build-out population, even during times of moderately severe drought. Because of the unpredictable variability of water supply, Boulder needs to remain flexible and innovative in the management of its water supplies and should continue to emphasize conservation and protection of its water resources. Boulder’s water quality goals include protection of the quality of waters at their source as a part of a multiple barrier approach to drinking water quality protection. Boulder seeks to maximize source water protection by encouraging cooperation among the landowners and land users in the watersheds supplying the city’s water. Management of watersheds, reservoirs, and water delivery facilities can compliment water treatment to provide a buffer that helps prevent harmful substances from passing through the treatment process into finished drinking water. Boulder’s Secondary Goals Secondary goals associated with the Barker system include hydropower generation, recreation, instream flows, and environmental enhancement. Hydropower generation is an effective way to conserve fossil fuels and can be accomplished as a byproduct to delivering water to the Betasso Water Treatment Plant. Boulder also seeks to provide for reasonable and safe recreational activities that are compatible with and do not compromise the primary goal of providing reliable, high quality drinking water for the city of Boulder. The current FERC license for Boulder Canyon Hydro Project provides for shoreline fishing, picnicking and other leisure opportunities at Barker Reservoir that do not involve body contact with the stored drinking water supply. Another important goal is to innovatively manage the city-owned water supplies to enhance and protect the natural environment in the Middle Boulder Creek watershed. As part of this GEI Consultants, Inc., Project 00364, 07/18/02 00364 Final Report (7-1-02).doc iii Version 1, July 23, 2002 enhancement, the city is committed to maintaining instream flows in Middle Boulder Creek below Barker Dam and is working cooperatively with the Colorado Water Conservation Board to meet this goal. The instream flow program will be an extension of the successful instream flow program that the city has jointly implemented with the Colorado Water Conservation Board on North Boulder Creek and Main Boulder Creek. Purpose of the Work Plan To help the city accomplish its primary and secondary goals for the Barker system and the city’s overall water supply system, the Water Resources work group within the city’s Public Works/Utilities Division developed the Middle Boulder Creek Water Source Management Work Plan (Work Plan). The purpose of the Work Plan was to compile existing information pertaining to the Barker system and the Middle Boulder Creek watershed, evaluate the information and make recommendations. The scope for the Work Plan did not include conducting new studies or creating new data. An important part of the information gathering process was to facilitate stakeholder involvement and present ways for the public to submit comments and concerns regarding the Middle Boulder Creek watershed. When gaps in information were identified, the management planning team recommended possible studies or sources of information to fill the existing gaps. Based on the information collected in the planning process, the work plan recommends management decisions and work efforts for the immediate future. The Work Plan is inherently dynamic and flexible, and will evolve as more is learned about the Middle Boulder Creek watershed. Work Plan Team The city of Boulder assembled a team of experts consisting of eight consulting firms or agents to assist in the development of the Work Plan. The Work Plan was developed through the city’s Utilities Division under the project management of Carol Ellinghouse, Water Resources Coordinator. Critical project support was provided by Joanna Stansbury, Water Resources Specialist; Jane Nelson, Public Works Communication Coordinator; June Busse, Utilities Project Manager specializing in raw water systems and hydropower; Amy Struthers, Water Quality Supervisor, and other key city employees. GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) was the lead consultant. GEI and Water Resources staff shared complimentary roles in managing the project, implementing the public process, and producing the Work Plan. The Project Team consisted of GEI, city staff and seven subconsultants specializing as follows (in alphabetical order): · Bill Lewis: limnology (study of freshwater lakes) · Brown & Caldwell: water quality and GIS · ERO Resources Co.: habitat, environmental issues, and GIS · GBSM: public process · Hydrosphere: hydrology, water supply system operations, and water rights · Kris Kranzush: historic and cultural issues, safety and security, and Community Liaison · Steve Walker: recreation GEI Consultants, Inc., Project 00364, 07/18/02 00364 Final Report (7-1-02).doc iv Version 1, July 23, 2002 Scope of Work The initial stages of the Work Plan Project involved development of project goals, objectives, and a scope of work. Project Team consultants were involved in the development process from its beginning stages. The scope of work guiding the Work Plan development process encompassed the following tasks. A more detailed scope of work is included in Appendix D. 1. Facilitate a Project Team scoping meeting and develop a scope of work and project budget. 2. Prepare a Middle Boulder Creek watershed Reference Index and Library. 3. Prepare a limnological model of Barker Meadow Reservoir. 4. Prepare a Betasso Water Treatment Plant Notification Plan for the Middle Boulder Creek watershed. 5. Prepare and implement an External Communication Plan, including a public involvement program. 6. Prepare and implement an Internal Communication Plan, including a participant-accessible Web site. 7. Compile existing information on Middle Boulder Creek watershed hydrology and water rights. 8. Evaluate Middle Boulder Creek recreational opportunities and their impacts on water quality, water quantity, and safety. 9. Evaluate historical and cultural resources associated with the Barker system. 10. Evaluate available Middle Boulder Creek watershed water quality information, including point-source and non-point-source pollutants and their pathways. 11. Evaluate hydropower facility operations and their impacts on water quality and quantities to develop short-term and long-term decision support tools and to produce a hydropower operations summary. 12. Evaluate reservoir drawdown requirements and the effects of maintaining a minimum reservoir pool elevation as a basis for future studies related to Barker Reservoir fishery habitat. 13. Review County, State, and Federal Regulations that pertain to the Barker system. 14. Coordinate with emergency response agencies to determine criteria for development of a Water Source Emergency Response Plan. 15. Evaluate watershed and ecological concerns to facilitate the development of Habitat Preservation and Maintenance Plans. 16. Integrate existing GIS maps of the watershed. 17. Facilitate and attend Project Team progress meetings. 18. Preparation and/or support of city staff in preparation of project progress reports, including four City Council reports. 19. Development and production of a final Middle Boulder Creek Water Source Management Work Plan. Public Process The objective of the public process was to involve all interested stakeholders and collect
Recommended publications
  • Lake Granby Fishery Management Report Jon Ewert, Aquatic Biologist, Colorado Parks and Wildlife February 2019
    Lake Granby Fishery Management Report Jon Ewert, Aquatic Biologist, Colorado Parks and Wildlife February 2019 Introduction Lake Granby, approximately 7,250 surface acres when full, is one of the largest coldwater reservoirs in the state. It is the main storage reservoir in the west slope portion of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project which supplies water to the northern Front Range through the Adams Tunnel at Grand Lake. It is a focal point of the Grand County tour- ism economy and offers many amenities. Recreational access is managed by the U.S. Forest Service as part of the Arapaho National Recreation Area. The recreational fishery of Granby is dominated by lake trout (aka mackinaw) and hosts the highest density of the species that has been documented in Colorado. Kokan- ee salmon have been stocked in Granby since 1951 to pro- vide recreational opportunity, a prey base to produce tro- phy lake trout, and spawning adults are captured annually to provide eggs for restocking. Rainbow trout of various sizes are also stocked and there is a moderate density of self-sustaining brown trout. Suckers and mottled sculpin Figure 1. Lake Granby are also present. Lake Granby also contains a dense population of mysis separate from the aggregate bag limit of other species. shrimp, which are an excellent prey source for smaller Due to reasons described above, the lake trout fishery in (<24”) lake trout. The high density of lake trout is a result Lake Granby is healthiest when a generous amount of har- of the availability of this prey base. However, the mysis vest is occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER 1 FISHING 2 CCR 406-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #100 - DEFINITIONS See also 33-1-102, C.R.S and Chapter 0 of these regulations for other applicable definitions. A. "Artificial flies and lures" means devices made entirely of, or a combination of, natural or synthetic non-edible, non-scented (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward), materials such as wood, plastic, silicone, rubber, epoxy, glass, hair, metal, feathers, or fiber, designed to attract fish. This definition does not include anything defined as bait in #100.B below. B. “Bait” means any hand-moldable material designed to attract fish by the sense of taste or smell; those devices to which scents or smell attractants have been added or externally applied (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward); scented manufactured fish eggs and traditional organic baits, including but not limited to worms, grubs, crickets, leeches, dough baits or stink baits, insects, crayfish, human food, fish, fish parts or fish eggs. C. "Chumming" means placing fish, parts of fish, or other material upon which fish might feed in the waters of this state for the purpose of attracting fish to a particular area in order that they might be taken, but such term shall not include fishing with baited hooks or live traps. D. “Game fish” means all species of fish except prohibited nongame, endangered and threatened species, which currently exist or may be introduced into the state and which are classified as game fish by the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand County Master Plan Was Adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on ______, 2011 by Resolution No
    Grand County Department of Planning and Zoning February 9, 2011 GRAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Gary Salberg, Chairman Lisa Palmer, Vice-Chair Sally Blea Steven DiSciullo George Edwards Karl Smith Ingrid Karlstrom Mike Ritschard Sue Volk GRAND COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS James L. Newberry, Commissioner District I Nancy Stuart, Commissioner District II Gary Bumgarner, Commissioner District III The Grand County Master Plan was adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on __________________, 2011 by Resolution No. ______________. The Master Plan was prepared by: Grand County Department of Planning & Zoning, 308 Byers Ave, PO Box 239, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 (970)725-3347 and Belt Collins 4909 Pearl East Circle Boulder, CO 80301 (303)442-4588 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1 Planning Approach & Context .................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 Building a Planning Foundation .............................................................................................17 Chapter 3 Plan Elements ...........................................................................................................................32 Chapter 4 Growth Areas, Master Plan Updates & Amendments ..........................................................51 Appendix A Growth Area Maps ...............................................................................................................53
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Grand County Colorado Tourism Board Press Kit
    GRAND COUNTY COLORADO TOURISM BOARD PRESS KIT Media Contact Gaylene Ore Ore Communications, Inc. [email protected] 970-531-2336 Table of Contents Fact Sheet…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...2-3 Grand County Communities…………..….…………………………………………………………...………………....…..……4 Get Your “Ing” On……..………………………………….……………………..………………………………………...……..5-6 Grand County Year-Round Destination…..………………………………………………………………………………………7 Water, Water Everywhere………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8-9 Rocky Mountain National Park………………..………………………………….……………………………………...............10 Grand County Dude Ranches …..………….………………………………………………………………..…….…………11-12 Scenic Drives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…......13 Mountain Golf.…….………….…………………………………………………………………………………...…..……………14 Western Heritage…….………………………………………………………………………………………………….....……....15 Meetings and Gatherings……………….……………………………………………………………………………...………….16 5-days of Summer..........…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…17-18 5-days of Winter..........…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………...…19 About Grand County, Colo. (www.visitgrandcounty.com) Located 67 miles west of Denver, Grand County is home to wide-open spaces, breathtaking mountain scenery and authentic old-west towns. Outdoor recreational activities include golf, boating, fishing, biking, hiking, fishing, hunting, horseback riding, skiing, cross country skiing, snowmobiling, ice fishing, sleigh rides and tubing. The area features more than 600 miles of mapped and marked trails, one national park, two
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Colorado Swimming Holes 6 Days More Itineraries
    Published on Colorado.com (https://www.colorado.com) Stellar Colorado Swimming Holes 6 days More Itineraries Nothing beats the heat like a sun-splashed swimming hole ? the perfect place to take in Colorado?s most dazzling landscapes and revel in the best of season with all of your favorite people. Find out what makes summer on our lakes and waterways so special by following a water-activity-focused itinerary featuring some of the state?s best swimming holes and a handful of other favorite warm-weather pastimes. Day 1 ACTIVITY Swimming at Jackson Lake Jackson Lake State Park features a large reservoir with sandy beaches and 240 campsites. The water is shallow and warms up quickly in the summer. Swimming is allowed on the west shore out to the no wake buoys. LUNCH ACTIVITY Boating at Jackson Lake Jackson Lake is an ?Oasis on the Plains? for all types of splash-worthy fun, including boating, fishing, sailboarding and water skiing. DINNER ACTIVITY Queen's Lounge Live music and dancing in a casual atmosphere in the heart of Fort Morgan. Take note of the infamous toilet seats that decorate the historic bar?s walls, which once served as the grand lobby of the Queen Hotel, opened in 1930. LODGING Day 2 Insider's Tip Fuel Up for the Drive: Grab a complimentary breakfast at the Hampton Inn Fort Morgan before making your way to Fort Collins. ACTIVITY Swimming at Horsetooth Reservoir Just west of Fort Collins, 6.5 miles of water beckons visitors to come out and play! Surrounded by 1,900 acres of public lands, this reservoir has it all: fishing, boating, camping, picnicking, swimming, scuba diving, rock climbing and water skiing.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operations Water Year 2017
    Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operations Water Year 2017 Presented by Victor Lee P.E. Hydrologic Engineer Eastern Colorado Area Office Topics: • Colorado-Big Thompson Project Overview – Colorado River Collection System – Green Mountain Reservoir Three Lakes System - Keystone of Colorado River Collection System Colorado River Collection System • Supports Colorado River storage and diversion Colorado-Big Thompson Project • Includes Lake Granby, Shadow Mountain Reservoir, Grand Lake and Lake Granby in 2014 Willow Creek Reservoir • Also used for storage of Windy Gap and 10825 Fishery Water Reservoir Operations: Colorado-Big Thompson Collection System • Lake Granby is projected to physically fill (537 KAF) by July 15 – Colorado River releases directed by Interior Secretary order 75 cfs for May-August – Lake Granby is anticipated to have minimal or no spill – Higher than average runoff for Willow Creek Reservoir – No Windy Gap pumping – 10825 Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery releases in late summer-early fall – Grand Lake Clarity Adaptive Management implemented for 2016 continued in 2017 Physical Fill: Second Week of July 10825 Water used to augment releases in late summer and early fall Green Mountain Reservoir • Provides water storage for Upper Colorado River Basin beneficial use • Replacement water for Colorado River Collection System • Hydropower generation Green Mountain Reservoir Reservoir Operations: Green Mountain • Green Mountain Reservoir is projected to physically fill (154 KAF) around July 10 – No spill: maximum release around 1450 cfs – Release water for west-slope beneficial use – Expect to support the Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program • Coordinated Reservoir Operations (CROS) • HUP Surplus Releases in September-October – Higher than Average Denver Water and Colorado Springs Utilities carry over storage contribute to higher than average inflow Coordinated Reservoir Operations HUP Irrigation Season Releases Fill Date Second Week of July Thank you Questions? Granby Spill in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Colorado River Basin Water Resources Planning Model User's
    Upper Colorado River Basin Water Resources Planning Model User’s Manual July 2016 Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. IV TABLE OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... VI 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING MODEL ...................... 1‐1 1.3 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 1‐3 2. WHAT’S IN THIS DOCUMENT .................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 SCOPE OF THIS MANUAL ..................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.2 MANUAL CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 WHAT’S IN OTHER CDSS DOCUMENTATION ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Windy Gap Firming Project: Alternatives Report
    Windy Gap Firming Project: Alternatives Report Prepared for⎯ U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Eastern Area Office 11056 W. County Road 18E Loveland, CO 80537-9711 and Municipal Subdistrict Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, acting by and through the Windy Gap Firming Project Water Activity Enterprise 220 Water Avenue Berthoud, CO 80513 Prepared by⎯ ERO Resources Corporation 1842 Clarkson Street Denver, Colorado 80218 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region September 2005 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Project Purpose and Need ............................................................................................ 2 3.0 Alternative Selection Process ...................................................................................... 2 3.1 Regulatory Requirements for Alternative Selection...............................................2 3.1.1 National Environmental Policy Act Requirements........................................2 3.1.2 Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.........................................................................3 3.2 Alternative Screening Process ................................................................................3 4.0 Alternative Plan Formulation Report........................................................................... 5 4.1 Phase I Element Identification and Screening ........................................................7 4.2 Phase II
    [Show full text]
  • Division 5 Water Court- February 2020 Resume 1. Pursuant to C.R.S., §37-92-302, As Amended, You Are Notified That the Following
    DIVISION 5 WATER COURT- FEBRUARY 2020 RESUME 1. PURSUANT TO C.R.S., §37-92-302, AS AMENDED, YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE FOLLOWING PAGES COMPRISE A RESUME OF THE APPLICATIONS AND AMENDED APPLICATIONS FILED WITH THE WATER CLERK FOR WATER DIVISION 5 DURING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2020. The water right claimed by this application may affect in priority any water right claimed or heretofore adjudicated within this division and owners of affected rights must appear to object and protest within the time provided by statute or be forever barred. 20CW3 (12CW98, 96CW358-B, 13CW3103, 19CW7) EAGLE COUNTY – GROUNDWATER TRIBUTARY TO TRAVIS CREEK TRIBUTARY TO THE EAGLE RIVER TRIBUTARY TO THE COLORADO RIVER. Robert & Marsha Long; 1501 Classen Dr., Oklahoma City, OK 73106. (405)659-9046. Irons Well No. 1 – Application for Change of Water Right and Amendment to Plan for Augmentation. Decreed Legal Description: NE¼SW¼ of Sec. 27, T.4S, R.83W. of the 6th P.M. 3,050 ft. from the north sec. line and 2,770 ft. from the east sec. line. Appropriation: September 27, 1996. Amount: 15.0 g.p.m., conditional. (not to exceed 0.75 a.f. per year) Uses: domestic, irrigation and fire protection. Proposed Change in Location: UTM: E356155 N4392761 Z13. NE¼SW¼ of Sec. 27, T.4S, R.83W. of the 6th P.M. 1,850 ft. from the south sec. line and 2,580 ft. from the east sec. line. Applicants request this change in location because their building envelope has moved up the mountain closer to Bellyache Ridge Road as the wildlife corridor has changed during the 15 years they have owned the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Windy Gap Firming Project Water Resources Technical Report
    Windy Gap Firming Project Water Resources Technical Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region December 2007 Water Resources Technical Report Windy Gap Firming Project prepared by ERO Resources Corporation 1842 Clarkson Street Denver, Colorado 80218 and Boyle Engineering Corporation 215 Union Blvd., Suite 500 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Acronyms and Abbreviations AF acre-feet BESTSM Boyle Engineering Stream Simulation Model C-BT Colorado-Big Thompson Project CDSS Colorado Decision Support System cfs cubic feet per sect CRWCD Colorado River Water Conservation District CWCB Colorado Water Conservation Board DW Denver Water EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOM end-of-month HUP Historic User’s Pool MPWCD Middle Park Water Conservancy District Non-Participants Windy Gap unit holders not participating in the Firming Project NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NCWCD Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District PACSM Platte and Colorado Simulations Model Participants Windy Gap Firming Project Participants Reclamation U.S. Bureau of Reclamation SEO State Engineer’s Office USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey WCFC Willow Creek Feeder Canal WGFP Windy Gap Firming Project WWTP Wastewater treatment plant Alternatives Alternative 1 — No Action, Enlarge Ralph Price Reservoir Alternative 2 — Proposed Action, Chimney Hollow Reservoir with Prepositioning Alternative 3 — Chimney Hollow Reservoir and Jasper East Reservoir Alternative 4 — Chimney Hollow Reservoir and Rockwell/Mueller
    [Show full text]
  • Windy Gap Firming Project
    Municipal Subdistrict: Windy Gap WINDY GAP FIRMING PROJECT 2015 chimneyhollow.org THE WINDY GAP FIRMING PROJECT is a collaboration between 13 Northeastern Colorado providers to improve the reliability of, or Ƥrm, water supplies from the Windy ap Project, which started delivering water in 1985 and is operated by Northern Water’s Municipal Subdistrict. The Ƥrming project proposes to build a new East Slope reservoir called Chimney Hollow to provide dedicated storage, which would supply a reliable 30,000 acre feet of water a year for future generations. WHO ARE THE PARTICIPATING WATER PROVIDERS, AND WHY DO THEY NEED THE PROJECT? There are 13 participants: 10 municipalities, two water districts and one power provider. Northern Water’s Municipal Subdistrict is coordinating the permitting process for them. WHY IS BUILDING CHIMNEY HOLLOW RESERVOIR By 2050, the water providers’ combined population will have THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE? far more than doubled what it was in 2005, to about 800,000. Water demand projections show a shortage in supply of Participants reviewed 170 potential alternatives to provide the 64,000 acre feet in 2030 and 110,000 acre feet by 2050. supply they need. Constructing the 90,000-acre-foot Chimney Hollow Reservoir southwest of Loveland was the top choice To address this shortage, participants are relying on multiple for both the participants and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, approaches: conservation, reuse, and additional supplies – the lead federal agency reviewing the project. including the Ƥrming project. Chimney Hollow is a regional, cooperative solution, saving money and reducing environmental impacts by building just Firming Project Participant Boundaries one reservoir for the 13 providers to share.
    [Show full text]