PICTURE of the MONTH Mesoscale Vortices Embedded Within a Lake

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PICTURE of the MONTH Mesoscale Vortices Embedded Within a Lake SEPTEMBER 2004 PICTURE OF THE MONTH 2269 PICTURE OF THE MONTH Mesoscale Vortices Embedded within a Lake-Effect Shoreline Band JOSEPH A. GRIM AND NEIL F. L AIRD* Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana±Champaign, Urbana, Illinois DAVID A. R. KRISTOVICH Atmospheric Environment Section, Illinois State Water Survey, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign, and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana±Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 15 December 2003 and 23 March 2004 1. Introduction cyclonic low-level circulations with diameters of about 50±120 km. Similarly, Pease et al. (1988) reported a Mesoscale vortices are one of the basic types of win- vortex over the southern basin of Lake Michigan that tertime atmospheric circulations that occur in the Great was accompanied by a weak cyclonic circulation and Lakes region as a result of lake-to-atmosphere heat and light snow. moisture exchanges. Mesoscale vortices associated with Past observational and numerical studies (e.g., Hjelm- the Great Lakes occur over a range of diameters from felt 1990; Pease et al. 1988) have indicated that meso- approximately 10 to 1000 km. On the largest scale, ag- b-scale lake-effect vortices tend to occur with large gregate vortices with widths of 500±1000 km form over lake±air temperature differences (DT) and weak syn- the Great Lakes region and often appear as weak low optic-scale winds. However, Laird et al. (2001) exam- pressure centers or large-scale sea level pressure (SLP) ined a mesoscale vortex that developed along an existing and circulation perturbations (e.g., Sousounis 1997). convergence zone under conditions of low DT (68±98C). This article presents a lake-effect event in which vortices More recently, Laird et al. (2003a,b) used numerical developed with diameters of 15±35 km, which fall with- simulations for a large range of lake-effect environments in large meso-g and small meso-b scales (Orlanski to determine that mesoscale vortex formation is related 1975). to small values of the ratio of wind speed (U) to overlake Meso-b-scale vortices with size scales near that of a fetch (L) and is independent of DT when DT $ 58C. lake basin are often the most impressive and discernable Meso-g-scale vortices are typically embedded within in appearance on satellite and radar imagery. For ex- or develop in close proximity to lake-effect shoreline ample, Laird (1999) documented an unusual case with snowbands. A number of past studies have indicated four meso-b-scale vortices simultaneously occurring signi®cant variations in small-scale structure along over Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior. These vor- shoreline snowbands (e.g., Shef®eld 1964; Pitts et al. tices are generally associated with weak winds and light 1977; Braham 1983; Passarelli and Braham 1981; snowfall (e.g., Forbes and Merritt 1984), although some Forbes and Merritt 1984). However, the study of can result in localized intense snowfall (Laird et al. Schoenberger (1986) was the only one to provide de- 2001). Forbes and Merritt (1984) documented 14 vortex tailed documentation of meso-g-scale vortices along a events over Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior dur- lake-effect snowband. He used dual-Doppler radar mea- ing a 5-yr period. The vortices were accompanied by surements to describe the structure and evolution of sev- brief snow squalls, lower surface pressures, and weak eral cyclonic and anticyclonic 10-km-scale vortices. While meso-g-scale vortices can cause signi®cant in- *Current af®liation: Department of Geoscience, Hobart and Wil- homogeneties in the structural coherence and snowfall liam Smith Colleges, Geneva, New York. distribution of shoreline bands, the mechanisms leading to their development are the least understood. Obtaining an understanding of the development of these cold-sea- Corresponding author address: Neil F. Laird, Department of Geo- science, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, 300 Pulteney St., Ge- son vortices may also provide insight toward mecha- neva, NY 14456. nisms responsible for analogous warm-season nonsu- E-mail: [email protected] percell vortex formation. q 2004 American Meteorological Society 2270 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 In this article, we provide detailed observations of a 5±8 km and a west-northwest to east-southeast orien- line of small-scale lake-effect vortices. These vortices tation. Peak effective re¯ectivity factors (re¯ectivities) developed along an intense lake-effect snowband over within each band ranged from 10 to 27 dBZ. Radial the eastern portions of Lake Michigan on 14 January velocities showed that the environment was character- 2003 (Fig. 1), had lifetimes of 2±5 h, and resulted in ized by nearly unidirectional ¯ow from 3008 with an signi®cant variations of the winds and snowfall rates increase in wind speed from 3 m s21 at about 100 m along the band. above the surface to 13 m s21 near the tops of the bands (approximately 1800 m). The orientation and spacing of the bands, as well as the environmental conditions, 2. Synoptic and mesoscale environment were similar to those reported in past studies of bound- Environmental conditions on 14 January 2003 were ary layer roll convection (i.e., wind-parallel bands) over conducive to the development of a strong land breeze Lake Michigan (e.g., Kelly 1986; Kristovich 1993). over western lower Michigan, leading to the formation The land breeze that had developed over western low- of a snowband oriented nearly parallel to the long axis er Michigan was initially observed by KGRR at around of Lake Michigan (i.e., shoreline band). At 0000 UTC, 0200 UTC. At the leading edge of the land breeze a a low pressure center was positioned near Maine with narrow region of weak divergence at 1500-m altitude a cold front along the northeastern Atlantic coast and could be seen in the radial velocity ®eld stretching along extending westward through Virginia and Kentucky. As the shore from 40 km north-northwest of Muskegon to the center of low pressure moved eastward, a weak about 85 km southwest of Grand Rapids. North-north- trough swung southward through the Great Lakes, pro- easterly near-surface winds were observed within the viding a region of large-scale convergence over Lakes land breeze by KGRR, while northwesterly winds con- Huron and Michigan (Fig. 2). A weak pressure gradient sistent with the synoptic pressure ®eld were observed over the western Great Lakes resulted in northwest sur- at higher levels. face winds generally less than 8 m s21. The increasingly The land-breeze front became more distinct in the radar cold air combined with Lake Michigan water surface re¯ectivity and radial velocity ®elds and moved slowly temperatures of 08±58C to cause DT to increase to 148± westward over the lake during the next several hours (Fig. 228C. At 850 hPa, temperatures in the vicinity of Lake 1f), while the radar observations suggested the wind- Michigan ranged from about 216.08 to 220.08C, with parallel bands became weaker and less coherent. Re¯ec- little evidence of the shallow, westward-extending sur- tivities increased along and just to the east of the land- face trough (Fig. 3). The temperature difference between breeze front as a shoreline snowband developed and the lake surface and 850 hPa exceeded the 138C criterion strengthened. By 1200 UTC the 20±30-km-wide, north± often cited for the development of lake-effect snows south-oriented, shoreline band had become stationary (e.g., Rothrock 1969; Niziol 1987). over the eastern portion of the lake (Fig. 1c). The band As both surface wind speeds in the vicinity of Lake intersected the shoreline both north of Muskegon and Michigan and surface temperatures over central lower near the Indiana±Michigan border. Re¯ectivities within Michigan began to decrease around 0000 UTC on 14 the band were as high as 32 dBZ, while divergence near January, a land breeze formed inland of the eastern shore the upper levels of the snowband (calculated from the of Lake Michigan from Manistee, Michigan, southward radial velocities) was about 6.7 3 1024 s21. to Benton Harbor, Michigan. Surface and radar obser- vations showed that by 0200 UTC the land-breeze front b. Small-scale vortices had moved westward to the shoreline, with the most coherent portion positioned offshore from Muskegon, Shortly after the shoreline band became stationary, Michigan, southward. As detailed in section 3, it is along wavelike perturbations developed along the band with the land-breeze front that an intense lake-effect shore- spacings of about 20 km. By 1330 UTC the band began line band formed and subsequently a line of small-scale propagating eastward while several of the wavelike per- vortices developed within the band. turbations developed into cyclonic vortices. Weak an- ticyclonic vertical vorticity was observed in some lo- cations, but anticyclonic vortices were not evident. 3. Radar observations Three cyclonic vortices developed along the southern portion of the shoreline band (south of KGRR) with a. Shoreline band formation radar re¯ectivity showing diameters ranging from 15 to Prior to the development of the shoreline snowband, 25 km. Initial values of vertical vorticity1 were about the National Weather Service (NWS) Grand Rapids 2.0 3 1023 s21, estimated from radial velocities. Shortly Doppler radar (KGRR) observed an area of wind-par- after 1330 UTC, the vortices propagated nearly due allel bands over Lake Michigan. At 0000 UTC 14 Jan- uary 2003, an area of widespread snow with embedded 1 Vertical vorticity for each vortex was estimated using peak in- banded structure was located just west of Grand Rapids, bound and outbound radial velocities along a line oriented perpen- Michigan (Fig. 1b). The bands had a spacing of about dicular to the radar beam through the vortex center.
Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Outer Rainband Mesovortices
    Presented at the 24th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, May 31 2000 EXAMINING THE PRE-LANDFALL ENVIRONMENT OF MESOVORTICES WITHIN A HURRICANE BONNIE (1998) OUTER RAINBAND 1 2 2 1 Scott M. Spratt , Frank D. Marks , Peter P. Dodge , and David W. Sharp 1 NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office, Melbourne, FL 2 NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL 1. INTRODUCTION Tropical Cyclone (TC) tornado environments have been studied for many decades through composite analyses of proximity soundings (e.g. Novlan and Gray 1974; McCaul 1986). More recently, airborne and ground-based Doppler radar investigations of TC rainband-embedded mesocyclones have advanced the understanding of tornadic cell lifecycles (Black and Marks 1991; Spratt et al. 1997). This paper will document the first known dropwindsonde deployments immediately adjacent to a family of TC outer rainband mesocyclones, and will examine the thermodynamic and wind profiles retrieved from the marine environment. A companion paper (Dodge et al. 2000) discusses dual-Doppler analyses of these mesovortices. On 26 August 1998, TC Bonnie made landfall as a category two hurricane along the North Carolina coast. Prior to landfall, two National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hurricane Research Division (HRD) aircraft conducted surveillance missions offshore the Carolina coast. While performing these missions near altitudes of 3.5 and 2.1 km, both aircraft were required to deviate around intense cells within a dominant outer rainband, 165 to 195 km northeast of the TC center. On-board radars detected apparent mini-supercell signatures associated with several of the convective cells along the band.
    [Show full text]
  • Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & a Brief Look at the 18
    Squall Lines: Meteorology, Skywarn Spotting, & A Brief Look At The 18 June 2010 Derecho Gino Izzi National Weather Service, Chicago IL Outline • Meteorology 301: Squall lines – Brief review of thunderstorm basics – Squall lines – Squall line tornadoes – Mesovorticies • Storm spotting for squall lines • Brief Case Study of 18 June 2010 Event Thunderstorm Ingredients • Moisture – Gulf of Mexico most common source locally Thunderstorm Ingredients • Lifting Mechanism(s) – Fronts – Jet Streams – “other” boundaries – topography Thunderstorm Ingredients • Instability – Measure of potential for air to accelerate upward – CAPE: common variable used to quantify magnitude of instability < 1000: weak 1000-2000: moderate 2000-4000: strong 4000+: extreme Thunderstorms Thunderstorms • Moisture + Instability + Lift = Thunderstorms • What kind of thunderstorms? – Single Cell – Multicell/Squall Line – Supercells Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? – Short/simplistic answer: CAPE vs Shear Thunderstorm Types • What determines T-storm Type? (Longer/more complex answer) – Lot we don’t know, other factors (besides CAPE/shear) include • Strength of forcing • Strength of CAP • Shear WRT to boundary • Other stuff Thunderstorm Types • Multi-cell squall lines most common type of severe thunderstorm type locally • Most common type of severe weather is damaging winds • Hail and brief tornadoes can occur with most the intense squall lines Squall Lines & Spotting Squall Line Terminology • Squall Line : a relatively narrow line of thunderstorms, often
    [Show full text]
  • J5J.1 1. Introduction the Bow Echo and Mesoscale Convective Vortex
    J5J.1 Keynote Talk: BAMEX Observations of Mesoscale Convective Vortices Christopher A. Davis and Stanley B. Trier National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado 80307 1. Introduction and a Lear jet leased from Weather Modification Inc. (WMI). Mobile Ground- The Bow Echo and Mesoscale based facilities included the Mobile Convective Vortex (MCV) Experiment Integrated Profiling System (MIPS) from (BAMEX) is a study of life cycles of the University of Alabama (Huntsville) mesoscale convective systems using three and three Mobile GPS-Loran Atmospheric aircraft and multiple, mobile ground-based Sounding Systems (MGLASS) from instruments. It represents a combination of NCAR. The MIPS and MGLASS were two related programs to investigate (a) referred to as the ground based observing bow echoes (Fujita, 1978), principally system (GBOS). The two P-3s were each those which produce damaging surface equipped with tail Doppler radars, the winds and last at least 4 hours and (b) Electra Doppler Radar (ELDORA) being larger convective systems which produce on the NRL P-3. The WMI Lear jet long lived mesoscale convective vortices deployed dropsondes from roughly 12 km (MCVs) (Bartels and Maddox, 1991). The AGL. project was conducted from 20 May to 6 For MCSs, the objective was to sample July, 2003, based at MidAmerica Airport mesoscale wind and temperature fields in Mascoutah, Illinois. A detailed while obtaining high-resolution snapshots overview of the project, including of convection structures, especially those preliminary results appears in Davis et al. (2004). The reader wishing to view processed BAMEX data should visit http://www.joss.ucar.edu/bamex/catalog/. In this keynote address, I will focus on the study of MCVs, based particularly observations from airborne Doppler radar and dropsondes and wind profilers.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for Electronic Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology
    Lyza, A. W., A. W. Clayton, K. R. Knupp, E. Lenning, M. T. Friedlein, R. Castro, and E. S. Bentley, 2017: Analysis of mesovortex characteristics, behavior, and interactions during the second 30 June‒1 July 2014 midwestern derecho event. Electronic J. Severe Storms Meteor., 12 (2), 1–33. Analysis of Mesovortex Characteristics, Behavior, and Interactions during the Second 30 June‒1 July 2014 Midwestern Derecho Event ANTHONY W. LYZA, ADAM W. CLAYTON, AND KEVIN R. KNUPP Department of Atmospheric Science, Severe Weather Institute—Radar and Lightning Laboratories University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama ERIC LENNING, MATTHEW T. FRIEDLEIN, AND RICHARD CASTRO NOAA/National Weather Service, Romeoville, Illinois EVAN S. BENTLEY NOAA/National Weather Service, Portland, Oregon (Submitted 19 February 2017; in final form 25 August 2017) ABSTRACT A pair of intense, derecho-producing quasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs) impacted northern Illinois and northern Indiana during the evening hours of 30 June through the predawn hours of 1 July 2014. The second QLCS trailed the first one by only 250 km and approximately 3 h, yet produced 29 confirmed tornadoes and numerous areas of nontornadic wind damage estimated to be caused by 30‒40 m s‒1 flow. Much of the damage from the second QLCS was associated with a series of 38 mesovortices, with up to 15 mesovortices ongoing simultaneously. Many complex behaviors were documented in the mesovortices, including: a binary (Fujiwhara) interaction, the splitting of a large mesovortex in two followed by prolific tornado production, cyclic mesovortexgenesis in the remains of a large mesovortex, and a satellite interaction of three small mesovortices around a larger parent mesovortex.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornadogenesis in a Simulated Mesovortex Within a Mesoscale Convective System
    3372 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES VOLUME 69 Tornadogenesis in a Simulated Mesovortex within a Mesoscale Convective System ALEXANDER D. SCHENKMAN,MING XUE, AND ALAN SHAPIRO Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received 3 February 2012, in final form 23 April 2012) ABSTRACT The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) is used to simulate a tornadic mesovortex with the aim of understanding the associated tornadogenesis processes. The mesovortex was one of two tornadic meso- vortices spawned by a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that traversed southwestern and central Okla- homa on 8–9 May 2007. The simulation used 100-m horizontal grid spacing, and is nested within two outer grids with 400-m and 2-km grid spacing, respectively. Both outer grids assimilate radar, upper-air, and surface observations via 5-min three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) cycles. The 100-m grid is initialized from a 40-min forecast on the 400-m grid. Results from the 100-m simulation provide a detailed picture of the development of a mesovortex that produces a submesovortex-scale tornado-like vortex (TLV). Closer examination of the genesis of the TLV suggests that a strong low-level updraft is critical in converging and amplifying vertical vorticity associated with the mesovortex. Vertical cross sections and backward trajectory analyses from this low-level updraft reveal that the updraft is the upward branch of a strong rotor that forms just northwest of the simulated TLV. The horizontal vorticity in this rotor originates in the near-surface inflow and is caused by surface friction.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Andrew in Florida: Dynamics of a Disaster ^
    Hurricane Andrew in Florida: Dynamics of a Disaster ^ H. E. Willoughby and P. G. Black Hurricane Research Division, AOML/NOAA, Miami, Florida ABSTRACT Four meteorological factors aggravated the devastation when Hurricane Andrew struck South Florida: completed replacement of the original eyewall by an outer, concentric eyewall while Andrew was still at sea; storm translation so fast that the eye crossed the populated coastline before the influence of land could weaken it appreciably; extreme wind speed, 82 m s_1 winds measured by aircraft flying at 2.5 km; and formation of an intense, but nontornadic, convective vortex in the eyewall at the time of landfall. Although Andrew weakened for 12 h during the eyewall replacement, it contained vigorous convection and was reintensifying rapidly as it passed onshore. The Gulf Stream just offshore was warm enough to support a sea level pressure 20-30 hPa lower than the 922 hPa attained, but Andrew hit land before it could reach this potential. The difficult-to-predict mesoscale and vortex-scale phenomena determined the course of events on that windy morning, not a long-term trend toward worse hurricanes. 1. Introduction might have been a harbinger of more devastating hur- ricanes on a warmer globe (e.g., Fisher 1994). Here When Hurricane Andrew smashed into South we interpret Andrew's progress to show that the ori- Florida on 24 August 1992, it was the third most in- gins of the disaster were too complicated to be ex- tense hurricane to cross the United States coastline in plained by thermodynamics alone. the 125-year quantitative climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Observational Study of Hurricane Eyewall Mesovortices
    AA PreliminaryPreliminary ObservationalObservational StudyStudy ofof HurricaneHurricane EyewallEyewall MesovorticesMesovortices Brian D. McNoldy and Thomas H. Vonder Haar Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS The observational study of fine-scale features in A series of recent case studies will be presented that demonstrate the existence of mesovortices, vortex mergers, polygonal eyewalls, and vortex crystals. All cases were collected from the GOES-8 geosynchronous satellite centered over 0°N 75°W. Some cases were taken from “Normal Operations”, meaning images are taken every 15 or 30 minutes (depending on location). In special cases, the satellite images the storm every seven minutes; this is called “Rapid Scan Operations”. Finally, in high- the eye and eyewall of intense tropical cyclones (TC) priority situations, images can be taken every minute; this is called “Super Rapid Scan Operations”. has been made possible with high temporal and spatial To view loops of all the cases using the highest temporal resolution available, visit http://thor.cira.colostate.edu/tropics/eyewall/. The following four cases are small excerpts from the full loops. resolution imagery from geosynchronous satellites. The current Geosynchronous Operational Environmental BRET, 22Aug99 (1845Z-2010Z) ALBERTO, 12Aug00 (1445Z-1915Z) Satellite (GOES) Series is capable of producing 1-km resolution visible images every minute, resulting in an immense dataset which can be used to study convective cloud tops as well as transient low-level cloud swirls. Computer models have shown that vorticity redistribution in the core of a TC can result in the formation of local vorticity maxima, or mesovortices.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Weather Forecasting Tip Sheet: WFO Louisville
    Severe Weather Forecasting Tip Sheet: WFO Louisville Vertical Wind Shear & SRH Tornadic Supercells 0-6 km bulk shear > 40 kts – supercells Unstable warm sector air mass, with well-defined warm and cold fronts (i.e., strong extratropical cyclone) 0-6 km bulk shear 20-35 kts – organized multicells Strong mid and upper-level jet observed to dive southward into upper-level shortwave trough, then 0-6 km bulk shear < 10-20 kts – disorganized multicells rapidly exit the trough and cross into the warm sector air mass. 0-8 km bulk shear > 52 kts – long-lived supercells Pronounced upper-level divergence occurs on the nose and exit region of the jet. 0-3 km bulk shear > 30-40 kts – bowing thunderstorms A low-level jet forms in response to upper-level jet, which increases northward flux of moisture. SRH Intense northwest-southwest upper-level flow/strong southerly low-level flow creates a wind profile which 0-3 km SRH > 150 m2 s-2 = updraft rotation becomes more likely 2 -2 is very conducive for supercell development. Storms often exhibit rapid development along cold front, 0-3 km SRH > 300-400 m s = rotating updrafts and supercell development likely dryline, or pre-frontal convergence axis, and then move east into warm sector. BOTH 2 -2 Most intense tornadic supercells often occur in close proximity to where upper-level jet intersects low- 0-6 km shear < 35 kts with 0-3 km SRH > 150 m s – brief rotation but not persistent level jet, although tornadic supercells can occur north and south of upper jet as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes
    Quasi-Linear Convective System Mesovorticies and Tornadoes RYAN ALLISS & MATT HOFFMAN Meteorology Program, Iowa State University, Ames ABSTRACT Quasi-linear convective system are a common occurance in the spring and summer months and with them come the risk of them producing mesovorticies. These mesovorticies are small and compact and can cause isolated and concentrated areas of damage from high winds and in some cases can produce weak tornadoes. This paper analyzes how and when QLCSs and mesovorticies develop, how to identify a mesovortex using various tools from radar, and finally a look at how common is it for a QLCS to put spawn a tornado across the United States. 1. Introduction Quasi-linear convective systems, or squall lines, are a line of thunderstorms that are Supercells have always been most feared oriented linearly. Sometimes, these lines of when it has come to tornadoes and as they intense thunderstorms can feature a bowed out should be. However, quasi-linear convective systems can also cause tornadoes. Squall lines and bow echoes are also known to cause tornadoes as well as other forms of severe weather such as high winds, hail, and microbursts. These are powerful systems that can travel for hours and hundreds of miles, but the worst part is tornadoes in QLCSs are hard to forecast and can be highly dangerous for the public. Often times the supercells within the QLCS cause tornadoes to become rain wrapped, which are tornadoes that are surrounded by rain making them hard to see with the naked eye. This is why understanding QLCSs and how they can produce mesovortices that are capable of producing tornadoes is essential to forecasting these tornadic events that can be highly dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Tornado Definition and Changes in Tornado Taxonomy
    1256 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 29 A Revised Tornado Definition and Changes in Tornado Taxonomy ERNEST M. AGEE Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Manuscript received 4 June 2014, in final form 30 July 2014) ABSTRACT The tornado taxonomy presented by Agee and Jones is revised to account for the new definition of a tor- nado provided by the American Meteorological Society (AMS) in October 2013, resulting in the elimination of shear-driven vortices from the taxonomy, such as gustnadoes and vortices in the eyewall of hurricanes. Other relevant research findings since the initial issuance of the taxonomy are also considered and in- corporated, where appropriate, to help improve the classification system. Multiple misoscale shear-driven vortices in a single tornado event, when resulting from an inertial instability, are also viewed to not meet the definition of a tornado. 1. Introduction and considerations from a cumuliform cloud, and often visible as a funnel cloud and/or circulating debris/dust at the ground.’’ In The first proposed tornado taxonomy was presented view of the latest definition, a few changes are warranted by Agee and Jones (2009, hereafter AJ) consisting of in the AJ taxonomy. Considering the roles played by three types and 15 species, ranging from the type I buoyancy and shear on a variety of spatial and temporal (potentially strong and violent) tornadoes produced by scales (from miso to meso to synoptic), coupled with the the classic supercell, to the more benign type III con- requirement in the latest definition that a tornado must vective and shear-driven vortices such as landspouts and be pendant from a cumuliform cloud, it is necessary to gustnadoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Using GLM Flash Density, Flash Area, and Flash Energy to Diagnose Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensification Patrick Duran1,2, Christopher J
    Using GLM Flash Density, Flash Area, and Flash Energy to Diagnose Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensification Patrick Duran1,2, Christopher J. Schultz1,2, Roger Allen2,3, Eric Bruning4, Stephanie N. Stevenson5, and David Pequeen4 1NASA Marshall Space Flight Center; 2NASA Short-Term Prediction Research and Transition Center ; 3Jacobs Space Exploration Group; 4Texas Tech University; 5NOAA NWS National Hurricane Center Background The Tropical Cyclone Diurnal Cycle as Observed by GLM • Increased lightning in tropical cyclones (TCs) is typically associated with intensification (e.g. Molinari et al. 1999; • Hurricane Dorian exhibited a classic “diurnal DC1 DC2 Stevenson et al. 2014), but significant lightning outbreaks are also observed in weakening storms (Xu et al. 2017). pulse” of cold cloud tops (Dunion et al. 2014). • The total number of lightning flashes in a TC is not always a reliable indicator of TC intensity evolution. • On both 30 and 31 August, a wave-like pulse • Issues with the range and detection efficiency of ground-based networks, particularly for intracloud lightning. propagated outward from the inner core, with • Physical processes such as vertical wind shear can intensify asymmetric convection while also weakening the TC. cooling infrared brightness temperatures on the • The commissioning of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) aboard GOES-16 and GOES-17 marked, for the leading edge and warming infrared brightness first time, the presence of an operational lightning detector in geostationary orbit. temperatures behind (Fig. 5). • In addition to flash density (the number of flashes per unit area per unit time), GLM also provides continuous observations of flash area and total optical energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Level Mesovortices Within Squall Lines and Bow Echoes. Part I: Overview and Dependence on Environmental Shear
    NOVEMBER 2003 WEISMAN AND TRAPP 2779 Low-Level Mesovortices within Squall Lines and Bow Echoes. Part I: Overview and Dependence on Environmental Shear MORRIS L. WEISMAN National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado ROBERT J. TRAPP1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received 12 November 2002, in ®nal form 3 June 2003) ABSTRACT This two-part study proposes fundamental explanations of the genesis, structure, and implications of low- level meso-g-scale vortices within quasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs) such as squall lines and bow echoes. Such ``mesovortices'' are observed frequently, at times in association with tornadoes. Idealized simulations are used herein to study the structure and evolution of meso-g-scale surface vortices within QLCSs and their dependence on the environmental vertical wind shear. Within such simulations, signi®cant cyclonic surface vortices are readily produced when the unidirectional shear magnitude is 20 m s 21 or greater over a 0±2.5- or 0±5-km-AGL layer. As similarly found in observations of QLCSs, these surface vortices form primarily north of the apex of the individual embedded bowing segments as well as north of the apex of the larger-scale bow-shaped system. They generally develop ®rst near the surface but can build upward to 6±8 km AGL. Vortex longevity can be several hours, far longer than individual convective cells within the QLCS; during this time, vortex merger and upscale growth is common. It is also noted that such mesoscale vortices may be responsible for the production of extensive areas of extreme ``straight line'' wind damage, as has also been observed with some QLCSs.
    [Show full text]