Rediscovery of a Native American Cultural Landscape: the Chickasaw Homeland at Removal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rediscovery of a Native American Cultural Landscape: the Chickasaw Homeland at Removal University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Geography Geography 2015 REDISCOVERY OF A NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: THE CHICKASAW HOMELAND AT REMOVAL Michael D. Walls University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Walls, Michael D., "REDISCOVERY OF A NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: THE CHICKASAW HOMELAND AT REMOVAL" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Geography. 37. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/geography_etds/37 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Geography by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of my work. I understand that I am free to register the copyright to my work. REVIEW, APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE The document mentioned above has been reviewed and accepted by the student’s advisor, on behalf of the advisory committee, and by the Director of Graduate Studies (DGS), on behalf of the program; we verify that this is the final, approved version of the student’s thesis including all changes required by the advisory committee. The undersigned agree to abide by the statements above. Michael D. Walls, Student Dr. Richard H. Schein, Major Professor Dr. Patricia Ehrkamp, Director of Graduate Studies REDISCOVERY OF A NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: THE CHICKASAW HOMELAND AT REMOVAL _______________________________________ DISSERTATION _______________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Michael David Walls Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Richard H. Schein, Professor of Geography Lexington, Kentucky 2015 © Michael D. Walls 2015 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION REDISCOVERY OF A NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: THE CHICKASAW HOMELAND AT REMOVAL Little information beyond generalities exists regarding the cultural landscape of the Chickasaw Indians in their ancestral homelands prior to Removal in the late 1830s. This dissertation evaluates one possible archival source for specifics of Chickasaw land use, the field notes and survey plats compiled as part of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). The process of original survey following land cession treaty divided the ceded area up into the familiar square-mile rectangular system of townships and ranges that extends from the Mississippi Territory westwards, in the so-called public land states. The research compiles all cultural observations made by the surveyors within a fourteen township area (totaling 504 square miles). This study area, generally located on the west bank of Town Creek between present-day Tupelo and Pontotoc MS, was chosen to cover the traditional center of Chickasaw settlement and elements of important roads such as the Natchez Trace. The resulting catalog of observations was compared to similar features on the township plats and to other cultural resource inventories to identify patterns of inscription and possible erasure of Native American cultural activities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology was used to consolidate and compare these data resources. The PLSS survey documents provide a useful but not complete resource for identifying Chickasaw cultural presence within the study area. No consistent pattern of omission or erasure of Chickasaw activities was identified. The analysis identifies several opportunities and caveats for future researchers who might extend this analysis, including technical challenges in applying GIS technology to this data. KEYWORDS: Chickasaw, GIS, historical geography, cultural landscape, Removal REDISCOVERY OF A NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: THE CHICKASAW HOMELAND AT REMOVAL By Michael David Walls ______Richard H. Schein____________ Director of Dissertation _____Patricia Ehrkamp______________ Director of Graduate Studies _________________________________ To my loving wife Gloria and daughter Connie, who have put up with me working on this project for far too long ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the interest and support provided by my dissertation committee, including: Dr. Richard H. Schein, Geography Dept., Chair Dr. Jonathan Phillips, Geography Dept. Dr. Karl Raitz, Geography Dept. Dr. Tracy Campbell, History Dept. I also would like to acknowledge the attention provided by my external committee member, Dr. Derek Lane. Dr. Ronald Eller also provided significant input into early stages of my work, prior to retiring from the History Department. Mr. Kirk Perry, Division Administrator in the Department of Homeland Affairs, The Chickasaw Nation, was of significant help in providing access to GIS and other cultural resource materials held by the Nation. He coordinated contacts with other scholars, including Ms. Wendy Cegielski and Dr. Brad R. Lieb, whose published research and data files were of critical value in this research project. He also shared his research on Chickasaw land patents. Mr. Paul M. Johnson, Special Project Officer in the Public Lands Division, Mississippi Secretary of State's Office, was of great assistance in locating and acquiring digital copies of PLSS documents for the study area. The Mississippi Department of Archives and History graciously granted permission for my use of their digital copy of Henry Lusher’s Map of Mississippi. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 Scope Of Project ...................................................................... 3 Research Questions ................................................................. 5 Overview Of Research Design ................................................. 8 Plan Of Approach ..................................................................... 9 Locations of Known Chickasaw Concentration ................... 9 Selection of Study Area ..................................................... 12 Utilization of PLSS Survey Data ........................................ 14 Approach to Interpreting Materials .................................... 27 Concerns With Survey Data As Historical Record .................. 29 Elaborating an Evidential Framework ................................ 30 Implications of Using the Framework ................................ 32 A Conceptual Toolkit For The Research ................................. 36 The Concept of Cultural Landscape .................................. 38 The Concept of Frontier .................................................... 60 METHODOLOGY ............................................................ 72 Working With PLSS Source Documents ................................. 72 Field Notes ........................................................................ 73 Township Plats .................................................................. 76 Assembling Images of the Source Documents .................. 78 Building A Digital Archive ....................................................... 78 Utilization of Observations from PLSS Field Notes ........... 80 Utilization of Scanned Plats ............................................... 82 Utilization of Base Map Data ............................................. 85 Working With Comparable Cultural Inventories ...................... 90 CONTEXT OF THE SURVEY ......................................... 91 Shifts Of Sovereignty Claims Over The Area.......................... 91 Physical Limits .................................................................. 94 Administrative Fiat ............................................................. 95 Shifting Rationales For Dispossessing Natives ...................... 97 Euro-American Concepts of “The Indian” ........................ 100 Euro-American Concepts of “Unimproved Wilderness” ... 111 Indians’ Place in Nature .................................................. 113 Recent Challenges to the Nature-Society Dichotomy
Recommended publications
  • Carolina Cradle: Settlement of the Northwest Carolina Frontier, 1747
    CAROLINA CRADLE Settlement of the Northwest Carolina Frontier, /;'47-1762 On the eve of All-Souls' Day I heard the dead men say Who lie by the tottering tower, To the dark and doubling wind At the midnight's turning hour, When other speech had thinned: "What of the world now?" The wind whiffed back: "Men still Who are born, do good, do ill Here, fust as in your time: Till their years the locust hath eaten, Leaving them bare, downbeaten; Somewhiles in Springtide rime, Somewhiles in summer glow, Somewhiles in winter snow:— No more I know." —Thomas Hardy CAROLINA CRADLE Settlement of the Northwest Carolina Frontier, 1747-1762 ROBERT W. RAMSEY The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill © 1964 by the University of North Carolina Press All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America ISBN 978-0-8078-0934-1 ISBN 978-0-8078-4189-1 (pbk.) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 64-22530 12 II 10 09 08 IJ 14 73 12 II To my father, whose profound understanding of the history and people of piedmont Carolina helped make this work possible This page intentionally left blank INTRODUCTION The records of Rowan County, North Carolina, date as far back as 1752. These ancient land grants, deeds, wills, mar- riages, and church and cemetery records contain the history of the northwest Carolina frontier, the doorway to the South and West. Rowan County originally included practically all of central and northwestern North Carolina and extended westward to the Mississippi River, having no western boundary line. While the vast amount of public and other records are in existence in this region, there is no information here to indicate whence these settlers came and why they came.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Emrick, Isaac J., "Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 5543. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Tyler Boulware, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. Michele Stephens, Ph.D. Department of History & Amy Hirshman, Ph.D. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Native Americans, Indian History, West Virginia History, Colonial North America, Diaspora, Environmental History, Archaeology Copyright 2015 Isaac J. Emrick ABSTRACT Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Old Fields, Home of the Shawnee
    Indian Old Fields, Home Of The Shawnee By Patsy Woodring - 2001 Indian Old Fields is the site of an Indian village and trading post in Clark County, Kentucky, called Eskippakithiki (Es-kip-pa-ki-thi-ki). The name is Shawnee for "Place of Blue Licks," referring to the salt deposits on Lulbegrud Creek. Mrs. Lucille Goff Clark, great-great-granddaughter of Thomas Goff, early settler in Clark County, says the settlement existed in the days between 1670 and 1754. The "thiki" part in the name meant "place," thus "blue-licks place." The word "Shawnee" in the Indian language meant "Southerner." Another writer, Bessie Taul Conkwright, explained that in 1724 a band of Shawnee Indians, who lived on the Savannah and Suanee [Suwannee?] rivers, had a quarrel with their neighbors and emigrated to Kentucky, settling near Howard's Creek. Mrs. Goff Clark wrote that the Shawnees were a branch of the Algonquin Indians of Wisconsin. This group had broken away from its tribe and settled permanently at Eskippakithiki. Within memory of the Indians themselves, not one tribe (except the fighting Shawnees) had dared to settle permanently in Kentucky, since these hunting grounds were considered to be the property of all tribes. However, according to archeological research, there have been many Indian settlements within the borders of Kentucky. John Goff reported that Indian Old Fields and Big Bone Lick were the only two Indian settlements in Kentucky. In 1922 Bessie Taul Conkwright stated that, in 1750, Indians dwelt in three places in the state. The Chickasaws were in the extreme west, on cliffs of the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Home Journal: 1879-03-27
    — : — : LiTTfim ‘S -H )1 A RECORD OF AGRICULTURE, LIVE STOCK, HORTICULTURE, BOTANY, AND THE KINDRED ARTS AND SCIENCES, — D $2 per year, in Advance. Agriculture is the most Healthful, most UsefUl, and most Hohle £mployment of Man. 'Wasblncton. Established 1865. Volume XXVII LOUISVILLE, THURSDAY, MARCH 27, 1879 Number 13 price received for the (ieorgetown. Cattle in demand and KENTUCKY TIMBER LANDS. and they all abound, in the Black $8. Then the one, and if that is selling at 4c to 4^c for good, and 2^c mountain especially. Owing to the crop was a very low Geological Extract from the Survey— Re- it is evident KENTUCKY FARM NOTES. to 3c for common common mules, abundance of water power, the access- the best his locality can do ; port on the Timbers in Bell and grow something more in to per head. Harlan Counties. ibility, in large quantities, of these tim- that he must BOONE COUNTY. $45 $75 WOODFORD. bers, and their great demand in car- demand. By feeding to live stock the A buzzard roost on the farm of Mr. perhaps have been turned A hand on the farm of John Stoutj The walnut timber is as ruthlessly de- riage making, I see no reason why the crop could Bryant, at Bryant’s Ford, is getting to be the expense of near Midway, lately broke 546 ll)s~bf stroyed in Eastern as in Western near future should not see many spoke to better account, and a public nuisance. .A. writer in the for hauling trimmed off, besides a hemp in one day.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of the American Indian/ Heye Foundation Records, 1890-1989
    Museum of the American Indian/ Heye Foundation Records, 1890-1989 Jennifer O'Neal and Rachel Menyuk 2012 National Museum of the American Indian 4220 Silver Hill Rd Suitland 20746-2863 [email protected] http://nmai.si.edu/explore/collections/archive/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 2 History of the Museum of the American Indian/Heye Foundation................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Directors, 1908 - 1990.............................................................................. 6 Series 2: Board of Trustees, 1916 - 1990............................................................. 58 Series 3: Administrative, 1916 - 1989.................................................................... 67 Series 4: Financial, 1916 - 1990...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uga Lab Series 30.Pdf
    University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report No. 30 Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No.7 HISTORIC PERIOD INDIAN ARCHAEOWGY OF NORTHERN GEORGIA By Marvin T. Smith Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of South Alabama April, 1992 Acknowledgments I am particularly grateful to Morgan R. Crook, Jr. for the opportunity to write this . synthesis. The contact period has been my research interest practically from my earliest field work. David J. Hally provided encouragement and assistance, and he provided access to the State Archaeological Site Files and collections housed at the University of Georgia. Many people contributed their thoughts and unpublished information. Eric Poplin provided information on his ongoing analysis of the Dog River sites, Jerald Ledbetter provided much information from his work on the Oconee River, James Hatch provided information on his work at the Lindsey Site, and Mark Williams provided advance copies of his excavation report on the Shinholser site as well as his thoughts on the Oconee River area. Tim Mistovich provided information about his work on the McIntosh Reserve. Tom Gresham provided data about bells recovered from Stallings Island, and Chuck Cantley provided information on his work in the West Point Reservoir. Charlotte Smith provided preliminary computer runs listing historic aboriginal sites in the State Archaeological Site Files. Jolee Gardner of Georgia Power Company provided a copy of Dennis Blanton's report on 9GP-HK-OB. Vernon J. Knight has increased my knowledge of the Creeks, especially those groups on the Chattahoochee, and Gregory Waselkov has proved most helpful with his insights of Creeks in Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION CATALOG with PHOTO Summer Fine Art & Antique Auction Saturday, July 14, 2018 9:00 Am
    AUCTION CATALOG WITH PHOTO Summer Fine Art & Antique Auction Saturday, July 14, 2018 9:00 am EST (Public Preview Friday, July 13, noon - 6pm) Case Antiques, Inc., Auctions & Appraisals www.caseantiques.com Email us Bidding and Current Auction information: [email protected] General information: [email protected] Follow us Online Bidding Knoxville Ph: (865) 558-3033 Knoxville Fax: (865) 558-3032 Nashville Ph: (615) 812-6096 Kingsport/Tri-Cities: (865) 310-7718 Gallery and Auction at NEW LOCATION 4310 Papermill Drive Knoxville, TN 37909 Summer 2018 7/14/2018 LOT # LOT # 1 2 Chinese White Jade Buckles w/ Metal Mounts Triangular hardstones and white jade plaques 1st item: Large Chinese carved buckle or mirror on second buckle are intact but loose. 700.00 - handle with intricately carved dragon head top 900.00 and reticulated carved chilong dragon figure to 4 2 Chinese Celadon Jade Buckles the body. Retains floral engraved and bat mirror 1st item: Chinese carved pale celadon jade mounts to the back. 5 3/4" L x 2 1/2" W double belt buckle, pierced with knot design, (includes metal mount). Late 19th/Early 20th chilong dragon hook. 2" H x 4 5/8" W. 2nd century. 2nd item: Chinese carved white jade item: Chinese carved pale celadon jade double buckle with dragon head top and partially belt buckle, pierced design with bats and reticulated carved dragon to the body. Retains scrolling flowers, chilong dragon hook. 1 1/4" H metal hook. 3 1/2" L(includes metal mount) x 1 x 4" W. Both late 19th/early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitfield, Br Yan, Smith
    .£MM-" Mo,noJ-l-EAD wnnF1ELD 1874-1\laZ WHITFIELD, BR YAN, SMITH, AND RELATED FAMILIES BOOK ONE WHITFIELD Compiled by EMMA MOREHEAD WHITFIELD Assisted by Many Members of These Families Edited by THEODORE MARSHALL WHITFIELD DEDICATED To THOSE ANCESTORS WHO HAVE HONORED THE LORD SERVED THEIR COUNTRY AND PASSED THE NAME UNSULLIED. iii Like leaves on trees the race of man is found, Now green in youth, now withering on the ground: Another race the following spring supplies, They fall successive, and successive rise; So generations in their course decay, So flourish these, when those are past away. The 11Uad translation by Alexander Pope V CONTENTS Page DEDICATION --------------·······················-··---------------····-·············-·------- iii QUOTATION FROM The Iniad ······················································ V LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .............................................................. ix EDITOR'S FOREWORD .................................................................... xi FOREWORD .................................................................................... xiii ABBREVIATIONS AND NUMBER SYSTEM ...................................... XV PART I WHITFIELD IN ENGLAND WHITFIELD OF WHITFIELD .......................................................... 3 THE GENEALOGY OF WHITFIELD IN ENGLAND ··············•-- 10 PART II WHITFIELD IN THE WEST INDIES AND VIRGINIA WHITFIELD IN THE WEST INDIES ............................................ 25 WHITFIELD IMMIGRANTS TO VIRGINIA .................................... 30 VIRGINIA
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Certain Ancient Tribes of the Northern Appalachian Province
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191 Anthropological Papers, No. 70 OBSERVATIONS ON CERTAIN ANCIENT TRIBES OF THE NORTHERN APPALACHIAN PROVINCE By BERNARD G. HOFFMAN 191 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 195 Evidence for relationships 196 1. Pocaughtawonauck—Massawomeck connection 196 2. Massawomeck-Massomack connection 198 3. Massawomeck-Black Minqua connection 201 4. Massawomeck-Erie connection 204 5. Black Minqua-Erie connection 206 6. Arrigahaga-Erie connection 210 7. Arrigahaga-Black Minqua connection 211 8. Richahecrian-Black Minqua connection 211 9. Richahecrian-Erie connection 220 10. Richahecrian-Rickohockan connection 220 11. Rickohockan-Erie connection 221 Conclusions 221 Bibliography 235 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE (Follows page 246) 26. Facsimile of section of Anonymous-Zuniga map of c. 1608. TEXT FIGURE 16. Diagram of name relationships 195 MAPS 4. Fascimile of section of John Smith's map of 1612 197 5. Possible Potomac route of Captain Fleet's brother 201 6. Facsimile of legend of Augustine Herrman's map of 1673 203 7. Facsimile of John Lederer's map of 1672 205 8. Facsimile of detail of Augustine Herrman's map of 1673 213 9. Protohistoric and early historic archeological phases of the Eastern United States 221 10. Components of the Fort Ancient Aspect 225 11. Components of the Monongahela and Shenk's Ferry Aspects 229 12. Components of the Iroquois Aspect 233 13. Probable distribution of Iroquoian tribes 234 193 OBSERVATIONS ON CERTAIN ANCIENT TRIBES OF THE NORTHERN APPALACHIAN PROVINCE By Bernard G. Hoffman INTRODUCTION This paper is the outcome of a detailed study conducted on the relationships between certain little-known tribes of the Appalachian region which are implied or indicated by the historical sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Location of Cemeteries, Graves, and Burial Grounds in Richland County, South Carolina
    FINAL REPORT ON THE LOCATION OF CEMETERIES, GRAVES, AND BURIAL GROUNDS IN RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Chicora Research Contribution 555 FINAL REPORT ON THE LOCATION OF CEMETERIES, GRAVES, AND BURIAL GROUNDS IN RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared By: Michael Trinkley, Ph.D. and Debi Hacker This project is funded by the Richland County Conservation Commission CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 555 Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202 803-787-6910 www.chicora.org September 15, 2014 This report is printed on permanent paper ∞ ©2014 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. except for brief quotations used in reviews. Full credit must be given to the author and publisher. DISCLAIMER While great care has been taken in the preparation of this work, neither the publisher nor the authors shall be held responsible or liable for any damages resulting in connection with or arising from the use of any of the information in this publication. This report supersedes Chicora Foundation Research Contribution 550, Provisional Location of Cemeteries, Graves, and Burial Grounds in Richland County, S.C. Cemetery numbers, coordinates, and names have changed. NOTICE The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed, in part, with funds from Richland County, South Carolina, administered by the Richland County Conservation Commission. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of Richland County or the Richland County Conservation Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Swamps and Rice Grounds: the Specialization of Inland Rice
    RICH SWAMPS AND RICE GROUNDS: THE SPECIALIZATION OF INLAND RICE CULTURE IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA LOWCOUNTRY, 1670-1861 by HAYDEN ROS SMITH (Under the Direction of Paul S. Sutter) ABSTRACT This study discusses the environmental and technological complexity of South Carolina inland rice plantations from their inception at the turn of the seventeenth century to their institutional collapse during the Civil War. Inland rice cultivation provided a foundation for the South Carolina colonial plantation complex and enabled planters’ participation in the Atlantic economy, dependence on enslaved labor, and dramatic alteration of the natural landscape. Also, the growing population of enslaved Africans led to a diversely acculturated landscape unique to the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Unlike many historical interpretations that categorize inland rice cultivation in a universal and simplistic manner, this study explains how agricultural systems varied among plantations. By focusing on planters’ and slaves’ alteration of the inland topography, this interpretation emphasizes how agricultural methods met the demands of the local environment. Inland cultivation began as a simple process for growing rice by taking advantage of available sites, yet enslaved laborers spent more energy refining old inland fields and creating new landscapes as the demand for the crop and the land increased. Moreover, planters had to modify a general cultivation model to fit within the diverse landscapes of the Coastal Plain. By paying detailed attention to Lowcountry topography, this study explains how the complex layering of soil and water presented people with a landscape to construct their cultural identity. This study also discusses how rice cultivators worked within these ecological boundaries to construct successful rice plantations and an important global agricultural commodity.
    [Show full text]