Wiltshire Ecological Appraisal April 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wiltshire Ecological Appraisal April 2017 Chippenham Gateway, south of J17 (M4), Wiltshire Ecological Appraisal April 2017 A Report on behalf of St. Modwen Developments Ref: 0229-EA-FM www.green-ecology.co.uk - 0845 474 8774 - [email protected] Green Ecology is a trading name for GE Consulting Services (UK) Ltd registered number 08435536 Registered office: Unit 10C, Gidleys Meadow, Christow, Devon, EX6 7QB. VAT Number 160595992 St. Modwen Developments Chippenham Gateway, south of J17 (M4), Wiltshire Site details Site Name Chippenham Gateway Site Location south of J17 (M4), Wiltshire Central OS Grid Reference 391925 179265 Client St. Modwen Developments Quality Assurance Report Title Ecological Appraisal Report Reference 0229-EA-FM Author Faye Midmore BSc MSc ACIEEM Checked By Mark Witherall BSc MCIEEM Approved By Mark Witherall BSc MCIEEM Revision No. 2 Issue Date 04 April 2017 Summary of Changes Minor changes to Exec Summary and Conclusions Revised By Faye Midmore BSc MSc ACIEEM The content of this report that has been provided by Green Ecology is true, and has been prepared and submitted in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the stated client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Green Ecology, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by Green Ecology for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Green Ecology has exercised due care in preparing this report. It has not, unless specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to the content of this report and Green Ecology assumes no liability for any loss resulting from errors, omissions or misrepresentation made by others. Any recommendation, opinion or finding stated in this report is based on circumstances and facts as they existed at the time that Green Ecology undertook the work. Nothing in this report constitutes legal opinion. If legal opinion is required the advice of a qualified legal professional should be secured. © Copyright GE Consulting Services (UK) Limited 2017 St. Modwen Developments Chippenham Gateway, south of J17 (M4), Wiltshire Executive Summary This report presents the results of an Ecological Appraisal of land south of Junction 17 of the M4 motorway in Wiltshire (central OS grid reference: 391925 179265) in relation to a proposed outline planning application for a warehouse/ employment development. It includes a mitigation package designed to overcome the impacts of the development. A desk study, Extended Phase 1 Habitat survey and protected species surveys for reptiles, bats, great crested newt, breeding birds, invertebrates and dormice were undertaken in 2015 and 2016 to provide baseline data for the site and assess the ecological implications of the development. The Site is 27.2 hectares (ha) and comprises arable and cattle-grazed improved grassland with very limited botanical diversity, species-rich hedgerows, veteran trees, broadleaved woodland, scrub and tall ruderal vegetation. A small stream runs through the centre of the Site and several ditches are present. All hedgerows were considered to meet the criteria of Section 41 Habitats of Principal Importance/ local BAP priority habitats and eleven hedgerows were identified as ‘Important’ under the Hedgerow Regulations 1997. Mature trees may also meet the criteria of local BAP priority habitats. The Site was found to have evidence of a range of protected and notable species, including breeding birds, badger, commuting/ foraging bats (including Annex II species), roosting bats and notable deadwood invertebrates. The outline proposal will result in the loss of up to 24ha of arable and improved grassland, the stream corridor, a section of woodland, > 1km of hedgerows and mature/ veteran trees. There will be a significant adverse impact on seven sections of ‘Important’ hedgerows, multiple mature trees of importance to notable deadwood invertebrate fauna and roosting, commuting and foraging bats. A mitigation strategy has been devised and will include: A Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Landscape and Ecology Management Plan (EMMP) produced prior to each detailed application and adhered to; Planting/ translocation of an equivalent or greater length of lost hedgerows to maintain/ enhance connectivity. 10m wide species-rich/ tussocky grassland buffer strips adjacent to boundaries; Creation of strips of annual arable weeds; Creation of wildlife friendly SUDS features, including the diversion of the existing stream, surrounded by a range of structurally diverse habitats; Tree planting as long-term compensation for the loss of trees. Protection of retained standard trees in Site’s outer boundaries; European Protected Species (EPS) licence for tree removal where bat roosts are present; Natural England licence for partial closure of badger sett; Dark corridors for bats around Site peripheries and the provision of bat boxes; Provision of bird boxes and landscape schedules that provide nuts, nectar seeds and berries. It is considered that the residual impact on the majority of ecological receptors will be neutral, however there will be a residual adverse impact on veteran trees and deadwood invertebrates which could be mitigated for in the long-term. Ecological Appraisal 04 April 2017 0229-EA-FM St. Modwen Developments Chippenham Gateway, south of J17 (M4), Wiltshire Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Description of Development ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Report ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Planning Policy and Legislation ............................................................................................... 2 2.1 Habitat and Species Legislation ............................................................................................... 2 2.2 National Planning Policy Framework ........................................................................................ 2 2.3 Regional/ Local Planning Policy ............................................................................................... 2 2.4 UK Post-2010 Biodiversity Framework ..................................................................................... 3 2.5 Local Biodiversity Action Plan .................................................................................................. 3 3 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Survey Limitations .................................................................................................................... 4 4 Ecological Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................ 5 4.1 Desk Study ............................................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey ............................................................................................ 6 4.3 Fauna ..................................................................................................................................... 11 5 Evaluation and Impact Assessment ....................................................................................... 24 5.1 Designated Sites .................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Habitats .................................................................................................................................. 24 5.3 Badger ................................................................................................................................... 26 5.4 Bats ........................................................................................................................................ 27 5.5 Breeding Birds ....................................................................................................................... 28 5.6 Dormouse .............................................................................................................................. 29 5.7 Great Crested Newt ............................................................................................................... 29 5.8 Invertebrates .......................................................................................................................... 29 5.9 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................. 30 5.10 Water Vole ............................................................................................................................. 30 5.11 Other Species ........................................................................................................................ 30 6 Further Survey Work ............................................................................................................... 30 7 Mitigation Strategy for Outline Application ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11607-8 — a Natural History of Ladybird Beetles M. E. N. Majerus , Executive Editor H. E. Roy , P
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11607-8 — A Natural History of Ladybird Beetles M. E. N. Majerus , Executive Editor H. E. Roy , P. M. J. Brown Index More Information Index 2-isopropyl-3-methoxy-pyrazine, 238 281, 283, 285, 287–9, 291–5, 297–8, 2-phenylethylamine, 237 301–3, 311, 314, 316, 319, 325, 327, 329, 335 abdomen, 17, 20, 22, 24, 28–9, 32, 38, 42, 110, Adalia 4-spilota,80 114, 125, 128, 172, 186, 189, 209–10, Adalia conglomerata, 255 218 adaline, 108, 237, 241 Acacia, 197, 199 adalinine, 237 acaricides, 316 adelgids, 29, 49, 62, 65, 86, 91, 176, 199, 308, Acaridae, 217 310, 322 Acarina, 205, 217 Adonia, 44, 71 Acer pseudoplatanus, 50, 68, 121 aggregations, 163, 165, 168, 170, 178, 184, Acraea, 228, 297, 302 221, 312, 324 Acraea encedana, 302 Aiolocaria, 78, 93, 133, 276 Acraea encedon, 297, 302 Aiolocaria hexaspilota,78 Acyrthosiphon nipponicum, 101 Aiolocaria mirabilis, 133, 276 Acyrthosiphon pisum, 75, 77, 90, 92, 97–101, albino, 273 116, 239 Alces alces,94 Adalia, 5–6, 10, 22, 34, 44, 64, 70, 78, 80, 86, Aleyrodidae, 91, 310 123, 125, 128, 130, 132, 140, 143, 147, alfalfa, 119, 308, 316, 319, 325 159–60, 166–7, 171, 180–1, 218, 222, alimentary canal, 29, 35, 221 234, 237, 239, 241, 255, 259–60, 262, alkaloids, x, 99–100, 195–7, 202, 236–9, 241–2, 269, 279, 281, 284, 286, 298, 311, 325, 245–6 327, 335 Allantonematidae, 220 Adalia 10-punctata, 22, 70, 80, 86, 98–100, anal cremaster, 38, 40 104, 108, 116, 132, 146–7, 149, Anatis, 4, 17, 23, 41, 44, 66, 76, 89, 102, 131, 154, 156, 160, 174, 181–3, 188, 148, 165, 186, 191, 193,
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinellidae)
    ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR OF THE LADYBIRD BEETLES (COCCINELLIDAE) Edited by I. Hodek, H.E van Emden and A. Honek ©WILEY-BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication CONTENTS Detailed contents, ix 8. NATURAL ENEMIES OF LADYBIRD BEETLES, 375 Contributors, xvii Piotr Ccryngier. Helen E. Roy and Remy L. Poland Preface, xviii 9. COCCINELLIDS AND [ntroduction, xix SEMIOCHEMICALS, 444 ]an Pettcrsson Taxonomic glossary, xx 10. QUANTIFYING THE IMPACT OF 1. PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION, 1 COCCINELLIDS ON THEIR PREY, 465 Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf /. P. Mid'laud and James D. Harwood 2. GENETIC STUDIES, 13 11. COCCINELLIDS IN BIOLOGICAL John J. Sloggett and Alois Honek CONTROL, 488 /. P. Midland 3. LIFE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT, 54 12. RECENT PROGRESS AND POSSIBLE Oldrkli Nedved and Alois Honek FUTURE TRENDS IN THE STUDY OF COCCINELLIDAE, 520 4. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS, 110 Helmut /; van Emden and Ivo Hodek Alois Honek Appendix: List of Genera in Tribes and Subfamilies, 526 5. FOOD RELATIONSHIPS, 141 Ivo Hodek and Edward W. Evans Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf Subject index. 532 6. DIAPAUSE/DORMANCY, 275 Ivo Hodek Colour plate pages fall between pp. 250 and pp. 251 7. INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, 343 Eric Lucas VII DETAILED CONTENTS Contributors, xvii 1.4.9 Coccidulinae. 8 1.4.10 Scymninae. 9 Preface, xviii 1.5 Future Perspectives, 10 References. 10 Introduction, xix Taxonomic glossary, xx 2. GENETIC STUDIES, 13 John J. Sloggett and Alois Honek 1. PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION, 1 2.1 Introduction, 14 Oldrich Nedved and Ivo Kovdf 2.2 Genome Size. 14 1.1 Position of the Family. 2 2.3 Chromosomes and Cytology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Coleopterous Family Coccinellid
    4T COCCINELLnXE. : (JTambrfljrjr PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. : d,x A REVISION OF THE COLEOPTEEOUS FAMILY COCCINELLIDJ5., GEORGE ROBERT CROTCH/ M.A. hi Honfcon E. W. JANSON, 28, MUSEUM STREET. 1874. — PREFACE. Having spent many happy hours with the lamented author in the examination of the beautiful forms of which this book treats, I have felt it a pleasant thing to be associated, even in so humble a capacity, with its introduction to the Entomological world ; and the little service I have had the privilege of rendering in the revision of the proof-sheets of the latter half of the work, has been quite a labour of love enabling me to offer a slight testimony of affection to a kind friend, and of my personal interest in that family of the Coleoptera which had first attracted my attention by the singular loveliness of its numerous species. A careful revision by the author himself would have been of incalculable value to the work ; its usefulness would also have been greatly enhanced, had it been possible for him to have made those modifications and additions which his investigations in America afforded materials for. But, of course, this was not possible. There is, however, the conso- lation of knowing that the student can obtain the results of those later researches, in the author's memoir, entitled " Revision of the Coccinellidse of the United States," to which Mr Janson refers in the note which follows this preface. When, in the autumn of 1872, Mr Crotch took his departure for the United States of America, as the first VI PREFACE.
    [Show full text]
  • Research of the Biodiversity of Tovacov Lakes
    Research of the biodiversity of Tovacov lakes (Czech Republic) Main researcher: Jan Ševčík Research group: Vladislav Holec Ondřej Machač Jan Ševčík Bohumil Trávníček Filip Trnka March – September 2014 Abstract We performed biological surveys of different taxonomical groups of organisms in the area of Tovacov lakes. Many species were found: 554 plant species, 107 spider species, 27 dragonflies, 111 butterfly species, 282 beetle species, orthopterans 17 and 7 amphibian species. Especially humid and dry open habitats and coastal lake zones were inhabited by many rare species. These biotopes were found mainly at the places where mining residuals were deposited or at the places which were appropriately prepared for mining by removing the soil to the sandy gravel base (on conditions that the biotope was still in contact with water level and the biotope mosaic can be created at the slopes with low inclination and with different stages of ecological succession). Field study of biotope preferences of the individual species from different places created during mining was performed using phytosociological mapping and capture traps. Gained data were analyzed by using ordinate analyses (DCA, CCA). Results of these analyses were interpreted as follows: Technically recultivated sites are quickly getting species – homogenous. Sites created by ecological succession are species-richer during their development. Final ecological succession stage (forest) can be achieved in the same time during ecological succession as during technical recultivation. According to all our research results most biologically valuable places were selected. Appropriate management was suggested for these places in order to achieve not lowering of their biological diversity. To even improve their biological diversity some principles and particular procedures were formulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Abhnadlungen Aus Dem Westfälischen Museum Für
    LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde 86. Band · 2017 Beiträge zur Entomofauna Nordrhein-Westfalens (Insecta: Coleoptera, Saltatoria) Karsten Hannig (Hrsg.) LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe Münster 2017 ISBN 978-3-940726-50-6 ISSN 0175-3495 Hinweise für Autoren In den Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde werden natur- wissenschaftliche Beiträge veröffentlicht, die den Raum Westfalen und angrenzende Regionen betreffen. Die Autoren werden gebeten, Manuskripte als WORD-Dokument per mail oder auf CD an das LWL-Museum für Naturkunde zu senden: Schriftleitung „Abhandlungen“ Dr. Bernd Tenbergen LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Sentruper Straße 285 48161 Münster [email protected] Das Manuskript sollte folgenden Aufbau haben: Überschrift, darunter Name (ausge- schrieben) und Wohnort des Autors, Inhaltsverzeichnis, kurze Zusammenfassung in deutscher und ggf. englischer Sprache, klar gegliederter Hauptteil, Literaturverzeichnis (Autoren alphabetisch geordnet), Anschrift des Verfassers. Lateinische Art- und Gattungs- namen sind kursiv zu schreiben. Alle Autorennamen im Text sowie im Literaturverzeichnis sind in Kapitälchen (z. B. RUNGE, F. (1976)) zu schreiben. Alle Tabellen und Abbildungen (Karten, Zeichnungen, Fotos) müssen eine Verkleinerung auf Satzspiegelgröße (12,6 x 19,8 cm) zulassen. Sie sollten als druckfertige pdf- und/oder Bild-Dateien eingereicht werden. Alle Abbildungen und Tabellen sind zusammen mit den Bildunterschriften bzw. Tabellenüberschriften nicht nur im Text eingebunden, sonderen auch als gesonderte Datei beizufügen. Fotos sind möglichst digital (Auflösung 300 dpi) oder in schwarzweißen Hochglanzab- zügen vorzulegen. Bei Farbaufnahmen sollte darauf geachtet werden, dass diese in der Regel schwarzweiß gedruckt werden. Das Literaturverzeichnis ist nach folgendem Muster anzufertigen: IMMEL, W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ecological Compensation Areas in Conservation Biological Control
    The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Promotor: Prof.dr. J.C. van Lenteren Hoogleraar in de Entomologie Promotiecommissie: Prof.dr.ir. A.H.C. van Bruggen Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. G.R. de Snoo Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. H.J.P. Eijsackers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof.dr. N. Isidoro Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italië Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Giovanni Burgio The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 3 september 2007 des namiddags te 13.30 in de Aula Burgio, Giovanni (2007) The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ISBN: 978-90-8504-698-1 to Giorgio Multaque tum interiisse animantum saecla necessest nec potuisse propagando procudere prolem. nam quaecumque vides vesci vitalibus auris aut dolus aut virtus aut denique mobilitas est ex ineunte aevo genus id tutata reservans. multaque sunt, nobis ex utilitate sua quae commendata manent, tutelae tradita nostrae. principio genus acre leonum saevaque saecla tutatast virus, vulpis dolus et gfuga cervos. at levisomma canum fido cum pectore corda et genus omne quod est veterino semine partum lanigeraeque simul pecudes et bucera saecla omnia sunt hominum tutelae tradita, Memmi. nam cupide fugere feras pacemque secuta sunt et larga suo sine pabula parta labore, quae damus utilitatiseorum praemia causa. at quis nil horum tribuit natura, nec ipsa sponte sua possent ut vivere nec dare nobis praesidio nostro pasci genus esseque tatum, scilicet haec aliis praedae lucroque iacebant indupedita suis fatalibus omnia vinclis, donec ad interutum genus id natura redegit.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—
    insects Article History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—Does the Landscape Transformation and Establishment of Harmonia axyridis Have an Impact? Andrzej O. Bie ´nkowskiand Marina J. Orlova-Bienkowskaja * A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 21 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Simple Summary: Studies of the history of regional insect fauna are important for understanding the changes in ecosystems and are therefore crucial for conservation decisions. The harlequin ladybird is a global invader that causes the decline of native ladybirds in some countries. Therefore, it is advisable to monitor the ladybird fauna in regions recently occupied by this species. We analyzed the dynamics of the fauna at the main sea resort of Russia over a period of 120 years to determine the following: (1) how the ladybird biodiversity changed during the intensive landscape transformation; (2) what alien species introduced for pest control have occurred to date; and (3) what the impact is of the harlequin ladybird on the ladybird fauna. We examined specimens collected by us and 54 other collectors including specimens from old museum collections and reconstructed the history of the biodiversity like a picture from puzzle pieces. Surprisingly, landscape transformation did not cause a decrease but rather an increase in ladybird biodiversity; most of the species recorded before 1930 have occurred to date, and 23 other species have spread to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ladybird Beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) of Moscow Province † N
    ISSN 0013–8738, Entomological Review, 2016, Vol. 96, No. 6, pp. 710–735. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2016. Original Russian Text © N.B. Nikitsky, А.S. Ukrainsky, 2016, published in Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2016, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 555–582. The Ladybird Beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) of Moscow Province † N. B. Nikitsky and А. S. Ukrainsky Zoological Museum, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 125009 Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received March 29, 2016 Abstract—Data on the fauna and ecology of the ladybird beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) of Moscow Province are summarized. In total, 60 species of 29 genera are recorded for this region. The paper is provided with 30 origi- nal color photographs of 29 species representing all the genera known from Moscow Province. DOI: 10.1134/S0013873816060051 As our long experience shows, the fauna of many to the territory of the Northern Caucasus (referred to groups of insects, including ladybird beetles, has been as “the Caucasus” in the paper), which was not sepa- incompletely studied in Moscow Province. Our paper rated in the Palaearctic catalogue from the south of the continues the series of publications with results of the European territory of Russia. investigation of the beetles of Moscow Province which For each species, the publications in which it was was started by Dwigubsky (1802) and is still being recorded for Moscow Province are cited. Labels are continued (Nikitsky et al., 2013; Troshkova et al., not listed for the species very widely distributed in the 2015; Troshkov and Nikitsky, 2015). territory of Moscow Province. The Transcaucasia is MATERIALS AND METHODS accepted here within the traditional borders: including Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the Black Sea part Our target investigation of the coleopterous fauna of of Krasnodar Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature in Cambridgeshire No 51 2009
    Nature in Cambridgeshire No 51 2009 Plate 1. Common Polypody (Polypodium vulgare) growing as an epiphyte in Fordham Woods (Photograph by David J. Barden). (See article on page 12) Plate 2. Mike Majerus (right) with Helen Roy and Lionel Kellaway in Thetford Forest. (See page 102) CONTENTS The status of Trifolium ochroleucon in Huntingdonshire Kevin Walker and Clare Pinches 3 Are Polypodium interjectum and P. vulgare increasing in Cambridgeshire? David Barden and C. D. Preston 12 Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire ladybirds Robert Frost and Peter M.J. Brown 20 Cambridge Milk-parsley (Selinum carvifolia) needs a helping hand in Cambridgeshire C. James Cadbury 28 Contributions towards a new algal flora of Cambridgeshire IV. Hilary Belcher, Eric George and Erica Swale 34 The Great Green Bush-cricket in ‘old’ Cambridgeshire Rob Partridge 44 Mistletoe undergoes an explosive increase in Cambridge C. James Cadbury and Philip H. Oswald 50 Pisidium tenuilineatum Stelfox, a bivalve new to Cambs. Peter Wilson 61 Scarce and rare Click beetles at Wimpole Estate and south-west Cambridgeshire Simon Damant 64 Analysis of Barn Owl Pellets from a Fen Habitat John Green and Roger Featherstone 67 Black Poplars (Populus nigra betulifolia) in Cambridgeshire Louise Bacon 69 Cottenham Boundaries Survey Peter Pilbeam 73 Ditton Meadows Survey Jonathan Shanklin and Steve Hartley 75 Parish Surveys 2007 Jonathan Shanklin 82 Vascular Plant Records Alan Leslie 84 Bryophyte records C.D. Preston and M.O. Hill 92 Invertebrate records Louise Bacon 95 OBITUARIES 99 BOOK REVIEWS 109 Review of the 2008 weather in The Botanic Garden John Kapor 111 Cover illustration: Sulphur Clover (Trifolium ochroleucon).
    [Show full text]
  • Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of Łinden-Oak-Hornbeam and Thermophilous Oak Forests of the Mazovian Lowland
    POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK INSTITUT ZOOLOGII FRAGMENTA FAUNISTlCA Tom 32 Warszawa, 1989.02.28 Nr 8 Wiesława C z e c h o w s k a Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of łinden-oak-hornbeam and thermophilous oak forests of the Mazovian Lowland [With 7 Tables and 3 Figures in the text] A bstract. In 1 9 7 6-1984 entomofaunistic studies were carried out in linden-oak-hornbeam (Tilio-Carpinetum) and thermophilous oak (Potentillo albae-Quercetum) forests on the Mazo­ vian Lowland. Species composition, community structure and abundance of Coccinellidae were determined in the canopy and herb layer in the studied habitats. Furthermore, the material was subject to zoogeograpliical and ecological analyses and seasonal dynamics was examined. INTRODUCTION Linden-oak-hornbeam forests are fertile deciduous forests of the alliance Carpinion betidi, spreading on large areas of Europe and its central part in particular. Due to pronounced geographical differences, several regional var­ iants of the linden-oak-hornbeam associations have been distinguished. Three basic associations of linden-oak-hornbeam forests may be found on the area of Poland, namely, Galio silvatici-Carpinetum in the eastern and south­ ern part of Poland, Stellario-Carpinetum on the Pomerania Lake District and Tilio-C arpinetum in the remaining part of the country (M atuszkiewicz 1981). So far the literature lacks, in substance, works dealing with Coccinellidae in linden-oak-hornbeam forests as well as in thermophilous oak forests. Some data may only be found in the papers by B i e l a w s k i (1971, 1978), where in­ formation was provided on the occurrence of ladybirds in mountain linden- -oak-hornbeam forests on the area of the Bieszczady and Pieniny Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioloģiskā Daudzveidība Gaujas Nacionālajā Parkā
    BIOLOĢISKĀ DAUDZVEIDĪBA GAUJAS NACIONĀLAJĀ PARKĀ Biodiversity in Gauja national Park AUTORI / AUTHORS Austra Āboliņa, Jānis Birzaks, Ilze Čakare, Andris Čeirāns, Inita Dāniele, Lelde Eņģele, Edīte Juceviča, Mārtiņš Kalniņš, Aina Karpa, Viesturs Ķerus, Rudīte Limbēna, Diāna Meiere, Ansis Opmanis, Māra Pakalne, Digna Pilāte, Valdis Pilāts, Alfons Piterāns, Arkādijs Poppels, Edmunds Račinskis, Mudīte Rudzīte, Solvita Rūsiņa, Ineta Salmane, Liene Salmiņa, Nikolajs Savenkovs, Dmitrijs Teļnovs, Andris Urtāns sastādījis / Compiled by Valdis Pilāts Gaujas nacionālā parka administrācija / Gauja National Park Administration Sigulda, 2007 Finansējis / Funded by Latvijas vides aizsardzības fonds / Latvian Environmental Protection Fund b i o l o Ģ i s K ā d a u d ZV e i d ī b a G a u j a s n a C i o n ā l a j ā p a RK ā IeteIcamaIs cItēšanas veIds Pilāts V. (red.) 2007. Bioloģiskā daudzveidība Gaujas nacionālajā parkā. Sigulda, Gaujas nacionālā parka administrācija. Recommended cItatIon Pilāts V. (ed.) 2007. Biodiversity in Gauja National Park. Sigulda, Gauja National Park Administration. nodaļu autoRI / LIst of contRIbutoRs Austra Āboliņa, Latvijas Valsts Mežzinātnes institūts “Silava”, [email protected] Jānis Birzaks, Latvijas Zivju resursu aģentūra, [email protected] Ilze Čakare, Gaujas NP administrācija, [email protected] Andris Čeirāns, Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas fakultāte, [email protected] Inita Dāniele, Latvijas Dabas muzejs, [email protected] Lelde Eņģele, Latvijas Dabas fonds, [email protected] Edīte Juceviča,
    [Show full text]
  • Biosystematics Berlin 2011
    BioSystematics Berlin 2011 21 – 27 February 2011 Programme and Abstracts 7th International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology (ICSEB VII) 12th Annual Meeting of the Society of Biological Systematics (Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik, GfBS) 20th International Symposium “Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology” of the German Botanical Society (DBG) This work is protected by German Intellectual Property Right Law. It is also available as an Open Access version through the congress homepage (www.biosyst-berlin-2011.de). Users of the free online version are invited to read, download and distribute it. Users may also print a small number of copies for educational or private use. Selling print versions of the online book is not permitted. Nomenclatural disclaimer: This work is not issued for the purpose of biological nomenclature under any of the existing biological Codes. This is to make sure that names of organisms in this work, whose specific use might imply a formal nomenclatural act (e.g., new combinations, new names), do not enter biological nomenclature unintentionally and pre-empt intended publication in another work. Cover and congress design: Nils Hoff, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin. Digital print: 15 Grad Druckproduktion, Berlin (http://www.15grad.de) Edited by (in alphabetical order): Thomas Borsch, Peter Giere, Jana Hoffmann, Regine Jahn, Cornelia Löhne, Birgit Nordt, Michael Ohl Published by the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. ISBN: 978-3-921800-68-3 2 Contents
    [Show full text]