DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Starts Application

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Starts Application The Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle Streetcar Center City Connector Section 5309 Small Starts Application October 2015 Table of Contents Page 1 General Reporting ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Project Description Template .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Project Narrative ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.2.1 Project Identification ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.2.2 The Setting ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.2.3 Current Conditions ................................................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2.4 Conditions in the Horizon Year .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.2.5 Purpose of the Center City Connector Project ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.2.6 Merits of the Project ............................................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.1.3 Project Maps .................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.2 Travel Forecasts .............................................................................................................. 1-14 1.2.1 Travel Forecasts Template ........................................................................................... 1-14 1.2.1.1 Trips on the Project ............................................................................................................................................ 1-14 1.2.1.2 Vehicle-Miles of Travel .................................................................................................................................... 1-15 1.2.2 Travel Forecasts Results Report ................................................................................... 1-15 1.2.2.1 Travel Markets ................................................................................................................................................... 1-15 1.2.2.2 Improvements to Transit Service - Proposed Operating Plan.................................................................. 1-16 1.2.2.3 Overall Transit Ridership Changes ................................................................................................................ 1-19 1.2.2.4 Project Ridership Changes ............................................................................................................................... 1-20 1.2.2.5 District to District Ridership Changes ............................................................................................................. 1-22 1.2.2.6 Uncertainty in Forecast Results ........................................................................................................................ 1-26 1.2.2.7 Summary of Project Mobility Benefits ........................................................................................................... 1-28 1.2.2.8 Index of Supporting Documentation .............................................................................................................. 1-28 1.2.3 Supporting Tabulations ................................................................................................ 1-29 1.3 Operations and Maintenance Costs ................................................................................ 1-31 1.3.1 Operations ................................................................................................................... 1-31 1.3.2 Preliminary Operations and Maintenance Cost Budget ............................................... 1-32 1.3.3 Supporting Documentation .......................................................................................... 1-33 1.4 Capital Costs ................................................................................................................... 1-36 1.4.1 Standard Cost Categories Workbook ............................................................................ 1-36 2 Project Justification Criteria .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Mobility Improvements ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Cost Effectiveness ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Congestion Relief .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4.1 Land Use Template ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.4.2 Supplemental Land Use Information Templates ............................................................ 2-2 2.4.2.1 Existing Corridor and Station Area Development ......................................................................................... 2-2 I | SMALL STARTS APPLICATION – TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4.2.2 Existing Corridor and Station Area Development Character ..................................................................... 2-6 2.4.2.3 Existing Station Area Pedestrian Facilities, Including Access for People with Disabilities ................. 2-14 2.4.2.4 Existing Corridor and Station Area Parking Supply .................................................................................. 2-17 2.4.2.4 Existing Affordable Housing ........................................................................................................................... 2-20 2.4.3 Supporting Documentation .......................................................................................... 2-23 2.5 Economic Development .................................................................................................. 2-22 2.5.1 Supplemental Economic Development ......................................................................... 2-22 2.5.2 Transit-Supportive Plans and Policies .......................................................................... 2-24 2.5.2.1 Transit Supportive Corridor Policies .............................................................................................................. 2-24 2.5.2.2 Supportive Zoning Regulations Near Transit Stations ............................................................................... 2-30 2.5.2.3 Tools to Implement Transit-Supportive Policies ........................................................................................... 2-33 2.5.3 Performance and Impacts of Land Use Policies ........................................................... 2-35 2.5.3.1 Performance of Land Use Policies ................................................................................................................. 2-35 2.5.3.2 Potential Impact of Transit Project on Regional Land Use ........................................................................ 2-38 2.5.4 Tools to Maintain or Increase the Share of Affordable Housing in the Corridor ................................................................................................................................. 2-42 2.5.4.1 Evaluation of Corridor-Specific Affordable Housing Needs and Supply ............................................. 2-42 2.5.4.2 Plans and Policies to Preserve and Increase Affordable Housing in the Region and/or Corridor ............................................................................................................................................................... 2-44 2.5.4.3 Adopted Financing Tools and Strategies Targeted to Preserving and Increasing Affordable Housing in the Region and/or Corridor ........................................................................................................ 2-45 2.5.4.4 Evidence of Developer and Public Sector Activity to Preserve and Increase Affordable Housing in the Corridor .................................................................................................................................... 2-46 2.5.4.5 Extent to Which Plans and Policies Account for Long-Term Affordability and Needs of the Very- and Extremely-Low Income Households in the Corridor ................................................................ 2-47 2.5.5 Supporting Documentation .......................................................................................... 2-48 2.6 Environmental Benefits ................................................................................................... 2-50 3 Local Financial Commitment ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Capital Cost .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • August 26, 2005
    LPB 419/17 REPORT ON DESIGNATION Name and Address of Property: Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments 107 Pine Street Legal Description: LOTS 1 AND 4 BLOCK 26, ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS LAID OUT BY A. A. DENNY, COMMONLY KNOWN AS A. A. DENNY’S 3RD ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS P. 33, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 9 FEET THEREOF HERETOFORE CONDEMNED IN DISTRICT COURT COUSE NUMBER 7092 FOR WIDENING OF FIRST AVENUE, AS PROVIDED UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 1129 OF CITY OF SEATTLE; EXCEPT FOR THE NORTHWESTERLY 7 FEET OF SAID LOT 1 HERETOFORE CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 57057 FOR THE WIDENING OF PINE STREET AS PROVIDED UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 14500 OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE. At the public meeting held on June 7, 2017 the City of Seattle's Landmarks Preservation Board voted to approve designation of the Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments at 107 Pine Street as a Seattle Landmark based upon satisfaction of the following standard for designation of SMC 25.12.350: C. It is associated in a significant way with a significant aspect of the cultural, political, or economic heritage of the community, City, state or nation; and D. It embodies the distinctive visible characteristics of an architectural style, or period, or a method of construction. Administered by The Historic Preservation Program The Seattle Department of Neighborhoods “Printed on Recycled Paper” DESCRIPTION Location and Neighborhood Character The subject building is located in Seattle’s Central Business District, across the Street and to the east of the Pike Place Market Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947
    Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947 1120 John Street 1986200525 see attached page D.T. Denny’s 5th Add. 110 7-12 Onni Group Vacant 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 The Blethen Corporation (C. B. Blethen) (The Seattle Times) Printing plant and offices Robert C. Reamer (Metropolitan Building Corporation) , William F. Fey, (Metro- politan Building Corporation) Teufel & Carlson Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination, October 2014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 7 THROUGH 12 IN BLOCK 110, D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION TO NORTH SEAT- TLE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 202, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DONATION CLAIM OF D.T. DENNY AND LOUIS DENNY, HIS WIFE, AND GOVERNMENT LOT 7 IN THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., LYING WEST- ERLY OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 204496, AS PROVIDE BY ORDINANCE NO. 51975, AND DESCRIBED AS THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THOMAS STREET AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2103211, NORTHERLY OF JOHN STREET, AND EASTERLY OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 110; AND TOGETHER WITH THE VACATED ALLEY IN BLOCK 110 OF SAID PLAT OF D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION, VACATED UNDER SEATTLE ORDINANCE NO. 89750; SITUATED IN CITY OF SEATTLE, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Evan Lewis, ONNI GROUP 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 T: (604) 602-7711, [email protected] Seattle Times Building Complex-Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report 1120 John Street, Seattle, WA October 2014 Prepared by: The Johnson Partnership 1212 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-6724 206-523-1618, www.tjp.us Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report October 2014, page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Westlake Transportation Hub Strategy
    Perteet - LMN Architects - GVA Kidder Matthews City of Seattle - Department of Transportation WESTLAKE TRANSPORTATION HUB STRATEGY WESTLAKE TRANSPORTATION A blueprint for transit integration, multi-modal access, and HUB STRATEGY placemaking within the expanding retail core of Seattle Transportation Hub Improvement Themes: Place-Based Improvement Strategies: Transit Integration VIRGINIA ST Westlake Hub Strategy Key Recommendations: FEDERAL COURTHOUSE PLAZA 7TH AVE 6TH A COSMOPOLITAN Legend VE “Times Square” WESTLAKE A Westlake Station Accommodate streetcar expansion and Street-Level Entrance to station mezzanine (existing) VE Retail-Based Entrance increasing development through a series to station mezzanine (existing) Street-Level Elevator of signature pedestrian and public space to station mezzanine (existing) Third Ave Mezzanine Extension (proposed) PLAZA 600 improvements Open-Air Tunnel Entrance RT ST (proposed) WA Transit STE Monorail (with station pulled back from 5th Ave) WESTIN Streetcar (with proposed extension and new stop) TOWER BUILDING WESTLAKEWESW STLALAKEE SQUARES E Bus Stop (to be retained and improved) Bus Stop (to be removed) Bus-Only Lane (peak-period only with right turns allowed) 5TH A Bus-Only Lanes (all-day with local access allowed) 6TH AY VE W VIRGINIA ST A VE Pedestrian and Bicycle OLIVE Fifth Avenue Connector 7TH Sidewalk Extensions BANK OF AMERICA AVE Increase visibility and direct physical Traffic Calming (with special roadway surface) Add parking and/or extend sidewalk MCGRAWMCGCGRAWAW SQUARESQ connections
    [Show full text]
  • Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments 1900/1911
    Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments 1900/1911 107 Pine Street, Seattle, WA 197570-0600 A. A. DENNY’S 3RD ADD. 26 1 & 4 LOTS 1 AND 4 BLOCK 26, ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS LAID OUT BY A. A. DENNY, COMMONLY KNOWN AS A. A. DENNY’S 3RD ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RE- CORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS P. 33, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 9 FEET THERE- OF HERETOFORE CONDEMNED IN DISTRICT COURT COUSE NUMBER 7092 FOR WIDENING OF FIRST AVENUE, AS PROVIDED UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 1129 OF CITY OF SEATTLE; EXCEPT FOR THE NORTHWESTERLY 7 FEET OF SAID LOT 1 HERETOFORE CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 57057 FOR THE WIDENING OF PINE STREET AS PROVIDED UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 14500 OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE. Lighthouse Investments LLC vacant 1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 508, Los Angeles CA 90035 Stimson Brothers SRO Hotel Charles Bebb Matthew Dow Ramin Kolahi 1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 508, Los Angeles CA 90035 (310) 556-1600 November 2016 Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments Landmark Nomination Report 107 Pine Street, Seattle, WA November 2016 Prepared by: The Johnson Partnership 1212 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-6724 206-523-1618, www.tjp.us Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments Landmark Nomination Report November 2016, page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Classification 4. Owner of Property
    NPS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department off the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Times Building and/or common Times Square Building 2. Location street & number 414 Olive Way not for publication city, town Seattle __ vicinity of state Washington code 053 county King code 033 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public x occupied agriculture museum ^ building(s) x private unoccupied x commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process y yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation n/a no military other: 4. Owner of Property name 414 Olive Associates street & number c/o Stephen K. Koehler, 6806 96th Avenue S.E. city, town Mercer Island vicinity of state Washington 98040 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. King County Administration Building street & number 500 4th Avenue city, town state Washington 98104 6. Representation in Existing Surveys_____ tltie Seattle Inventory of Cultural Resources^ this property been determined eligible? __ yes _JL_no date 1979 federal state county x local depository for survey records Office of Urban Conservation city, town Seattle state Washington 98104 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered _ x_ original site _x_good ruins v altered mpv^d d^te fair unex posed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Times Building is a compact, well detailed structure styled in the fashion of the Italian Renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020
    Historic Report on the Hahn Building / Hotel Elliot 103 Pike Street, Seattle, Washington Prepared by: StudioARC consulting 6119 Brooklyn Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98115 November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 1.1 Research and Report Organization 1.2 Methodology, Timeframe and Consulting Firm. 1.3 Previous Reports and Nominations 2. Property Information & Background…………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 Property Data 2.2 Site Description 2.3 Neighborhood History and Context 2.4 Building Typology 3. 103 Pike Street: The Hahn Building……………………………………………………………………..12 3.1 Current building description 3.2 Historic overview, owners and uses of the building 3.3 The architects 3.4 Architectural description and original Design 3.5 Changes over Time 4. Images…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27 4.1 Context maps and photos 4.2 Historic maps and photos 4.3 Current images 5. Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………………………….44 The Hahn Building Historic Report November 2020 page 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research and Report Organization This report was researched, written, and organized to provide background information on the Hahn Building /Hotel Elliot (also known as the Hotel Elliott or Elliott Hotel, for this report, Hahn Building will be used) located at 103 Pike Street in Seattle. Research, organization and compilation of this report was performed by StudioARC Consulting in the Winter and Spring of 2020 by Kathryn Rogers Merlino and staff. Established in 2019, StudioARC is a historic preservation and adaptive reuse consulting firm that provides historic research, landmark consulting and adaptive reuse design consulting. Specific archival access was restricted due to COVID-19 closures were augmented by previous report data and cited in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key to Seattle, Washington
    City Alphabets: The Key to Seattle, Washington A K W Washington Park Arboretum King Street Station, Klondike Gold Whale, Water Tower @ Volunteer Footbridge, Arctic Building Detail: Rush, Kayak, Kubota Gardens, Kal- Park, Westlake Center, formally Walrus, Seattle Asian Art Museum @ akala: Puget Sound Ferry, Kobe Bell WAMU: 1201 Third Avenue Build- Volunteer Park, Seattle Art Museum @ Seattle Center ing, Waterfront/Streetcar Olympic Sculpture Park: Typewriter Eraser by Claes Oldenburg, Seattle L X Art Museum Olympic Sculpture Alki Statue of Liberty in West Seattle, eXtreme Sports: Paragliding, Rock Park: Eagle by Alexander Calder, Se- Lake Union, Ballard Locks Climbing attle Art Museum: Downtown: Ham- M Y mering Man by Jonathon Borofsky Monorail, Make a Wish…, Mount Old Yesler Mill, Minoru Yamasaki: B Rainier, Metro Bus, Mountlake Cut/ Pacific Science Center Arches/1962 Broadway Dance Steps, Benaroya Bridge World’s Fair, Yesler Cottages Hall, Bumbershoot, Boathouses, N Z Bicycling, Hiking Boot, Baseball Norton Building, Norvell House, Zymogenetics: Seattle City Light C Old Norway Hall, Northwest (Cardi- Building, Zebra, Zip Codes, Zodiac Craftsman House, Dale Chihuly nal Direction) Glass, Industrial Cranes, Epiphany O Anita H. Lehmann Episcopal Church, Coffee, Chief Osprey, Orca Killer Whale, Olympic Artist + Architect Seattle, Seattle Central Library Mountains Anita H. Lehmann is a teacher, D an artist, and an award-winning P architectural illustrator. She is a Duwamish Waterway Bridge, Detail Pike and Virginia Building, Clock @ @ Cobb Building, Arthur Denny’s registered architect in the state Pike Place Market, Pig @ Pike Place of Washington with a Master of Cabin, Denny Re-grade, Discovery Market, Float Plane, Pergola, PI Park Lighthouse Architecture from the University of Globe, Pig Bus: Maximus/Minimus, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Historic Preservation Ordinance
    REVISITING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: WHAT WORKS, WHAT DOESN’T, AND IS THERE AN OPTIMAL SOLUTION? by JANINE LOUISE DUNCAN (Under the Direction of James K. Reap) ABSTRACT The inclusion of historic preservation into city and county codes, or ordinances, was due in part to the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA). This thesis is an examination of how different communities have interpreted preservation at the local level via the inclusion of a historic preservation ordinance into municipal and/or county code. Because all preservation begins at the local level, an attempt has been made to identify the optimal parts, or inclusions, in a municipal or county historic preservation ordinance. A brief legal basis for the use of preservation ordinances is included, as is an examination of existing preservation codes, and ordinance data gathered by the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions. The optimal ordinance inclusions are provided in the final chapter. INDEX WORDS: Historic preservation ordinance, Preservation ordinance, Thesis, Graduate school, Student, Master of Historic Preservation, The University of Georgia REVISITING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: WHAT WORKS, WHAT DOESN’T, AND IS THERE AN OPTIMAL SOLUTION? by JANINE LOUISE DUNCAN B.A., Gonzaga University, 1985 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2007 © 2007 Janine Louise Duncan All Rights Reserved REVISITING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: WHAT WORKS, WHAT DOESN’T, AND IS THERE AN OPTIMAL SOLUTION? by JANINE LOUISE DUNCAN Major Professor: James K. Reap Committee: Maryanne Akers Melvin Hill Smith Wilson Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2007 iv DEDICATION The author wishes to dedicate her thesis to her parents, Marlece and Howard Duncan.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districtsMjtu iiillHiuliuns in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property_______________________________________________________ Historic name MEDICAL DENTAL BUILDING_______________________________ Other names/site number __________________________________________________ 2. Location street & number 509 Olive Way ___ ___ not for publication city or town Seattle ___ ___ vicinity State Washington code WA county King code 033 zip code 98101 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property V^meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally statewide ^locally.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) RECEIVED United States Department of the Interior AUG 1 21987 National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name U.S. Immigration Building other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 84 Union Street I I not for publication city, town Seattle I I vicinity state Washington code 053 (WA) county King code 033 zip code 98102 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property ["x] private I~x1 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district 1 ____ buildings I I public-State EH site ____ sites I I public-Federal I I structure ____ structures I I object ____ objects 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A 0 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this EEl nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places aiTdjrneets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10·900 OMS No. 1024-0018 (Ocl. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Reg;ster of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bl;Jl1etin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10·900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Historic name PIONEER SQUARE·SKID ROAD NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT Other names/site number 2. Location Roughly bounded by the Viaduct, Railroad Ave. S., King St, 4'" and 5'" street & number not for publication Avenues, James and Columbia Sts and including the 500 block of 1" Ave South city or town ....,:S=.e:::a:.:tt:.:I:.:e=----- _ vicinity State Washington code WA county King code 033 zip code 98104 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ..!. nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of H~tgric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]