Doosan Babcock Response to Scotland Energy Strategy Consultation: May 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Doosan Babcock Response to Scotland Energy Strategy Consultation: May 2017 Doosan Babcock Response to Scotland Energy Strategy Consultation: May 2017 Executive Summary Doosan Babcock Investment in the Scottish Energy Strategy As a UK based energy engineering services specialist operating across the Thermal, Oil and Gas, Nuclear and Distributed Energy sectors, Doosan Babcock takes a strong interest in the proposed Scottish Energy Strategy. Employing over 4,000 professional and blue collar staff and with manufacturing capacity based in Scotland, Doosan Babcock has felt the impact of the evolution of the energy sector. The whole systems approach taken in the Scottish Government’s Draft Energy Strategy document is welcomed to allow Scotland, and Scottish businesses, to move ahead and become global leaders in driving the interaction that is necessary between the heat, transport and power elements of the energy system in a modern low carbon environment. Distributed Energy, Low Carbon, Whole System Approach Doosan Babcock applaud Scotland’s progress in decarbonisation of the electricity grid We recognise the upcoming challenges in the decarbonisation of heat and transport - Scotland has the opportunity, capability and drive to take a leading global role in this activity The Scottish Government should produce, as soon as possible, a detailed sector road map, setting out the process for decarbonising heat (electrification and the role of hydrogen), in order that there is a clear path and timeline to achieving the targets laid out in the draft strategy (similar comments also apply to electricity and transport) Support from Government and certainty in policy / timelines will allow Scottish business to invest, recruit and be set up to deliver the technologies and people required in delivering the carbon reduction targets Poor air quality in our urban areas, and the resultant negative health impacts, should be addressed in the Scottish Energy Strategy The role of Fuel Cell in a Distributed, Whole Energy System Approach Doosan Babcock believes in the role of hydrogen fuel cells in the future, decarbonised energy system Hydrogen must play a role decarbonising heat and transport and to support the intermittency of renewables Stationary fuel cells represents a ‘no risk’ investment being the most efficient and reliable option to generate electricity and / or CHP locally using natural gas and/or biogas with the option to retrofit for hydrogen fuel In addition to the decarbonisation benefits, a stationary fuel cell is the ideal dependable generation for urban locations due to its negligible NOx and particulates emissions To derive competitive advantage, Scotland needs to assess the strategic opportunity presented by fuel cells and consider reflecting their benefits as it develops policy initiatives. UK energy policy makers have not appropriately considered the benefits of fuel cells and we propose that Scotland should take the policy lead in this respect Initial policy support in Scotland and corresponding fuel cell deployment would not only deliver benefits for the Scottish energy system but also, through economies of scale, render fuel cells cost effective creating significant manufacturing and export opportunities for Scottish business in an evolving global fuel cell market The Role of Thermal Generation Being a large employer in the sector, Doosan Babcock has felt the impact of thermal plant closure in Scotland. We recognise the need for the energy mix, and our business, to evolve into a low carbon, whole system approach in the future The Role of Nuclear Generation Doosan Babcock is a large employer in the Nuclear sector with significant presence at the existing operational plant (Torness and Hunterston) and is active in the decommissioning of life expired plants We encourage continued life extension of the existing plant to support decarbonisation of the electricity mix Doosan Babcock sees significant opportunity in nuclear new build, and recognises the current Scottish Government policy in this respect. With the ongoing UK government support for a new generation of SMR’s © Doosan Babcock Page 1 May 2017 Doosan Babcock Response to Scotland Energy Strategy Consultation: May 2017 (Small Modular Reactors) perhaps it is the time now to have a fresh independent look at what role this technology could play in Scotland’s energy system The Role of North Sea Oil and Gas As a significant employer in the Scottish Oil and Gas sector, Doosan Babcock applaud the drive for continued recovery of our natural resource for Scotland to receive the positive economic impact it brings As highlighted above, we believe fuel cell technology represents a clean and efficient way to generate heat and electricity from our natural gas before transitioning to zero emission hydrogen The Role of CCS We are somewhat sceptical of the need for a large CCS infrastructure to capture Scotland’s industrial CO2 emissions. We believe that this could end up a stranded asset if a review of the 2050 industrial landscape is not enacted before any CCS implementation decision. We recognise that hydrogen production technology is an integral part of the Strategy. We believe that a renewables based hydrogen production system is more aligned with Scotland’s energy aspirations; ultimately hydrogen production scale and economics may drive the requirement for a CCS infrastructure © Doosan Babcock Page 2 May 2017 Doosan Babcock Response to Scotland Energy Strategy Consultation: May 2017 Response to questions 1. What are your views on the priorities presented in Chapter 3 for energy supply over the coming decades? In answering, please consider whether the priorities are the right ones for delivering our vision. 1.1 Continuing to Support the Recovery of North Sea Oil and Gas as a Highly-Regulated Source of Hydrocarbon fuels As a significant employer in the Scottish oil and gas sector, Doosan Babcock supports the drive for continued recovery of our natural resource for Scotland to receive the positive economic impact it brings. Considering the very aggressive carbon reduction targets, and the necessary transition from fossil fuels, it is necessary to recognise how we can make most efficient and clean use of our resource. 1.2 Supporting the Demonstration and Commercialization of Carbon Capture and Storage and CO2 Utilization Introduction Over the past ten years, Doosan Babcock have invested over £35m in the development and proving of carbon capture technology, culminating in the design and construction of the then largest carbon capture plant (capable of capturing 100te/day, equivalent to around 5MWe, or 0.25% of plant total output at full load) at Ferrybridge. With the decline of new build coal plant across the UK, and the unavailability of any Government support to enable technology demonstration at any reasonable industrial / utility scale, the Ferrybridge plant was decommissioned in 2014. In the interim period, Doosan Babcock redeployed the bulk of the Carbon Capture team into other technology areas, and has wound down internal activity on this technology, to the level of a watching brief as far as the UK market is concerned. The Renfrew personnel employed in CCS activity currently mainly provide technical and R&D support to our parent company Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction, who are involved in the global coal new build market in areas where there is still an interest in utility scale carbon capture. Industrial Carbon Capture Recently, and as outlined in the Energy Strategy document, the CCS technology application in the UK has shifted from utility to industrial scale application, with growing support for the establishment of an industrial CCS infrastructure. As illustrated in the attached in house Doosan Babcock document (Appendix 2) we estimate that, at best, around 33% of UK industrial CO2 emissions can be captured; the remaining 67% are either too diverse for capture or will be avoided by technology change (driven by cost considerations). The analysis is based on 2015 data on the installed industrial capacity in the UK at that time. In the intervening period there has been closures in the steel industry which reduce the bulk of CO2 emissions from that industry, there is a move by steel producing organisations like Liberty to produce a GreenSteel strategy which will reduce/eliminate CO2 emissions from that industry1, and as we move towards transport decarbonisation one has to question if all the current six refineries in the UK have a future in their current form. Similar comments apply to all the industrial sectors involved; it seems that the approach is to accept that industrial processes have to be carbon intensive, so let’s build an infrastructure to capture and store the emitted carbon. In Doosan Babcock view, this approach has the potential for the CCS infrastructure developed around the current industry base and technology to become a stranded asset in the not too distant future, as the industry it would have been built to serve changes and develops in a low carbon world. From an industrial future perspective, and to aid understanding of the potential demand for a CCS infrastructure, Doosan Babcock believe that now is the time to answer a different set of questions based around building a low carbon industrial future for Scotland i.e. what is the industrial pathway for Scotland?, what industrial processes have a long term future?, how can those processes be made carbon independent? (a philosophy of rather than 1Liberty House Group about section (2017) http://www.libertyhousegroup.com/company/vision/ © Doosan Babcock Page 3
Recommended publications
  • Doosan Corporation and Its Subsidiaries Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2019 and 2018 9 1. General
    Doosan Corporation and its subsidiaries Notes to the consolidated financial statements December 31, 2019 and 2018 1. General 1.1 The Parent company information Doosan Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated on December 18, 1933, under the name of Sohwa-Kirin Beer, Ltd. to manufacture and sell beer. The Company has changed its name to Dongyang Beer, Ltd. in February 1948 and again to OB Beer, Ltd. in February 1996 and finally to Doosan Corporation on September 1, 1998. The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) have been prepared based on Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (“KIFRS”) 1110 Consolidated Financial Statements. Since June 1973, the Group’s shares have been listed in the Korea Exchange. After several capital issues, the Group’s share capital as of December 31, 2019 is ₩123,738 million, including ₩24,447 million of preferred shares. The Group’s ordinary shares as of December 31, 2019 are owned as follows: Number of ordinary shares Ownership owned percentage (%) Related parties 7,805,623 47.24 Treasury stocks 3,000,866 18.16 Others 5,717,346 34.60 16,523,835 100.00 Meanwhile, 35.9% of preferred shares are owned by the largest shareholder and others and 51.6% of preferred shares are owned by others. 1.2 Consolidated subsidiaries information Details of the subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows: Ownership ratio of Ownership ratio of non-controlling the Group (%)(*1) interests (%)(*1) Financial Subsidiary Type of business Location 2019 2018 2019 2018 closing date Oricom Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reporting Period
    DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2020 and 2019 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) Contents Page Independent Auditors’ Report 1 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 7 Consolidated Statements of Loss 9 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss 10 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity 11 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 13 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 15 152, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06236 (Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam Finance Center 27th Floor) Republic of Korea Independent Auditors’ Report Based on a report originally issued in Korean To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.: Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (“the Group”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the consolidated statements of loss and other comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (“K-IFRS”). Basis for Opinion We conducted our audits in accordance with Korean Standards on Auditing (“KSAs”). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
    [Show full text]
  • CHFCC Membership Directory
    www.chfcc.org CHFCC Membership Directory For more information, please contact: Joel M. Rinebold 860.291.8832 Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology, Inc. 222 Pitkin Street, Suite 101 East Hartford, CT 06108 www.ccat.us Funding Provided by The Connecticut Hydrogen-Fuel Cell Coalition (CHFCC) works to enhance economic growth through the development, manufacture and deployment of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies and associated fueling systems. The CHFCC is comprised of representatives from Connecticut’s fuel cell and hydrogen industry, labor, academia, government, and other stakeholders. Services AG/ENA Professional Services - www.arrch2alliance.com American Hydrogen Association Non-Profit - www.clean-air.org Bradley, Foster & Sargent, Inc. Professional Services - www.bfsinvest.com Center for Clean Energy Engineering Professional Services - www.energy.uconn.edu Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology, Inc. Non-Profit - www.ccat.us Connecticut Clean Cities Government Related - www.eere.energy.gov/cleancities Connecticut Clean Energy Finance & Investment Authority Government - www.ctcleanenergy.com Connecticut Department of Economic & Community Development Government - www.decd.org Connecticut Department of Transportation Government - www.ct.gov/dot Connecticut Siting Council Government - www.ct.gov/csc CTTRANSIT Public Transit - www.cttransit.com Design By Analysis, Inc. Technical Services - www.dbaworks.com Fuel Cell Perspectives Professional Services Gannon & Scott Professional Services The Greater New Haven Transit District Government
    [Show full text]
  • Doosan Corporation Notes to the Separate Financial Statements December 31, 2019 and 2018
    Doosan Corporation Notes to the separate financial statements December 31, 2019 and 2018 1. General Doosan Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated on December 18, 1933, under the name of Sohwa-Kirin Beer, Ltd. to manufacture and sell beer. The Company has changed its name to Dongyang Beer, Ltd. in February 1948 and again to OB Beer, Ltd. in February 1996 and finally to Doosan Corporation on September 1, 1998. Since June 1973, the Company’s shares have been listed in the Korea Exchange. After several capital issues, the Company’s share capital as of December 31, 2019, is ₩123,738 million, including ₩24,447 million of preferred shares. The Company’s ordinary shares as of December 31, 2019 are owned as follows: Number of ordinary Ownership shares owned percentage (%) Related parties 7,805,623 47.24 Treasury stocks 3,000,866 18.16 Others 5,717,346 34.60 16,523,835 100.00 Meanwhile, 35.9% of preferred shares are owned by the largest shareholder and others and 51.6% of preferred shares are owned by others. 2. Summary of significant accounting policies 2.1 Basis of preparation The Company prepares statutory financial statements in Korean in accordance with KIFRS enacted by the Act on External Audit of Stock Companies. The Company’s financial statements are separate financial statements prepared in accordance with KIFRS 1027 Separate Financial Statements, in which the controlling company, investors of associates or participants of joint control company have stated investment assets as accounting based on direct equity investment, not based on the reported performance and net assets of the investee.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Your Tomorrow Today
    BUILDING YOUR TOMORROW TODAY Doosan Corporation Fact Book 2017 C0ntents 04 History of Doosan 05 Companies of Doosan 06 The Doosan Way 07 Doosan Corporation 08 Our Businesses 10 Electro-Materials 18 Industrial Vehicle 24 Mottrol 30 Fuel Cell 36 Doota DF 40 Glonet 44 Information & Communications 46 FM 48 Global Network Doosan Corporation 03 History of Doosan Established in 1896 as Korea’s first modern enterprise and now its oldest company with a proud 121-year history, Doosan has been making phenomenal growth on the strength of its revolutionary innovations since the late 1990s. With a sustainable management structure meeting the global standard, Doosan is starting a new chapter for a new century. 1896~1949 | The Foundation of Our Success 1896 •Park Seung-jik opened first store 1925 • Changed the name of Park Seung-jik Store 1915 • Started making Parkabun, a cosmetic Limited. powder 1950~1979 | The Birth of Doosan Group 1951 • Established Doosan Trading Company ( Currently Doosan Corporation (Currently Doosan Corporation Glonet BG) Electro-Materials BG) 1952 • Established Oriental Brewery • Established Doosan Development 1960 • Established Dongsan Construction 1975 • Established Dongyang Agriculture and Engineering (Currently Doosan 1978 • Renamed OB Group as Doosan Group Engineering & Construction) 1979 • Established Oricom Inc. 1974 • Established OAK Industries Korea 1980~1995 | Growth 1980 • Founded OB Seagram 1993 • Opened Yonkang Hall 1982 • Formed OB Bears (Currently Doosan Bears) (Currently Doosan Art Center) 1987 • Established Doosan
    [Show full text]
  • Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. And
    DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Interim Financial Statements June 30, 2020 and 2019 (Unaudited) (With Independent Auditors’ Review Report Thereon) Contents Page Independent Auditors’ Review Report 1 Consolidated Interim Financial Statements Consolidated Interim Statements of Financial Position 3 Consolidated Interim Statements of Income (Loss) 6 Consolidated Interim Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 7 Consolidated Interim Statements of Changes in Equity 8 Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows 10 Notes to the Consolidated Interim Financial Statements 12 152, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06236 (Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam Finance Center 27th Floor) Republic of Korea Independent Auditors’ Review Report Based on a report originally issued in Korean The Board of Directors and Shareholders Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.: Reviewed financial statements We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Group”), which comprise the consolidated interim statement of financial position as of June 30, 2020, the consolidated interim statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the consolidated interim statements of changes in equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory
    [Show full text]