What Kind of a Poem Is Matthew Arnold's "Thyrsis"? the Answer Has Seemed Self-Evident Ever Since It Was Published in 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Kind of a Poem Is Matthew Arnold's What kind of a poem is Matthew Arnold's "Thyrsis"? The answer has seemed self-evident ever since it was published in 1861: it is an elegy, more specifically a pastoral elegy, occasioned by the death of Arnold's friend and fellow poet Arthur Hugh Clough five years earlier in Florence. "Thyrsis" is the third of the three great pastoral elegies in English poetry, the other two being Milton's "Lycidas" and Shelley's "Adonais." But is "Thyrsis" a pastoral elegy in quite the same way that "Lycidas" and "Adonais" are.7 Over forty years ago, Richard Giannone was not sure that it is: "Thyrsis' is something of an anomaly among pastoral elegies," he wrote. "One could justifiably call it a pastoral elegy manqué in so far as Arnold stops considerably short of the kind of complete shaping of the poem according to the pastoral conventions one finds, say, in Spenser's November eclogue or Astrophel, or in 'Lycidas.'"3 Yet no one has followed up on Giannone's questioning of the poem's genre, which continues to seem self-evident to critics. In his still influential study of Arnold's poetry, A. Dwight Culler distinguishes "Thyrsis" from "The ScholarGipsy," to which it is frequently compared, by stressing its different generic identity: "The Scholar-Gipsy," he says, is "primarily a Romantic dream-vision which creates an ideal figure who lives outside of time, whereas [Thyrsis'] is an elegy about a human figure who lived in time and was thereby destroyed" (p. 250). David Riede discusses "Thyrsis" along with "The Scholar-Gipsy" under the heading "Pastoral and Elegy,"4 and in the most recent commentary on the poem, Patrick Connolly reiterates the poem's dependence on the "long ancestral line" of pastoral elegy: "As a poem 'Thyrsis' falls within the pastoral elegy form, though this may not be obvious at first reading. Consequently it is dependent on a long ancestral line of such poetry from Shelley and Milton to Moschus and Theocritus."5 This unproblematic classification of "Thyrsis" as a pastoral elegy has ensured that critics, by never looking at the poem from an alternative generic perspective, see only what they habitually expect to find in pastoral elegies instead of seeing what Arnold actually wrote. "We often think of genre designation as one of the last acts a reader performs- and to some extent it is true that a work's precise generic placement is often unclear until we have finished reading it," says Peter Rabinowitz in Before Reading. "But some preliminary generic judgment is always required even before we begin the process of reading. We can never interpret entirely outside generic structures: 'reading'- even reading of a first paragraph- is always 'reading as.'"6 No poem, least of all one assumed to belong to so conventional a form as the pastoral elegy, stands "entirely outside generic structures," and so when we read "Thyrsis" as a pastoral elegy, it is difficult to avoid succumbing to the force of generic conventions, the recognition that it is one of a family of similar poems, and thus to be led very quickly from what the individual work is actually saying to what we assume the generic structure to which it belongs is saying through the work. On the other hand, there is no possibility of not reading intertextually, since no work exists entirely outside generic conventions. So the question "Thyrsis" presents, then, is not whether to read it intertextually- there is no choice other than to do so- but rather what poems constitute the most relevant and illuminating inter-texts? Or, to pose the question another way: what kind of poem is "Thyrsis" and in what generic tradition(s) does it participate? Without denying its indisputable affiliations with the pastoral elegy (with "Lycidas" as its most influential English representative) and with the broader pastoral tradition that "The Scholar-Gipsy" participates in, I propose to argue that the exclusive classification of "Thyrsis" as a pastoral elegy has prevented us from recognizing that it is, in fact, a generically mixed lyric that combines the conventions of the classical pastoral elegy with the new kind of poem we now identify as distinctively Romantic, the lyric genre that M. H. Abrams calls the greater Romantic lyric.7 Although the title and sub-title of "Thyrsis: A Monody, to Commemorate the Author's Friend, Arthur Hugh Clough, Who Died at Florence, 1861" create the expectation of a conventional pastoral elegy, the poem (as Giannone perceived) deviates noticeably from the classical paradigm exemplified by "Lycidas." It might just as appropriately have been titled, in imitation of Wordsworth or Shelley, "Elegiac Stanzas Written in the Cumner Hills." For what had intervened between the classically inspired "Lycidas" and Arnold's mid-Victorian elegy is, of course, Romanticism, which changed forever the landscape of English poetry. Given Arnold's widely acknowledged complex relationship to the Romantic poets, it should come as no surprise that his mid-Victorian elegy follows, even while it modifies, the structural pattern of Abrams' greater Romanic lyric. As numerous critics have observed, "Dover Beach" is a later instance of that form, and Michael O'Neill has recently pointed out that "A Summer Night" "owes much to the structure of what M. H. Abrams calls 'the Greater Romantic Lyric.'"8 What has not been noticed, however, is how thoroughly Arnold has integrated the structure of the Romantic lyric into his "pastoral elegy manqué." Rather than approaching "Thyrsis" as the last example of a form on the verge of extinction, then, I propose to read it as a generically mixed poem, one that experimentally fuses what appear to be two incompatible genres. Although the elegy as a form has undergone renewed interest in recent decades, the position of "Thyrsis" in Arnold's poetic canon has declined over the same period. "During the past twenty years," says Melissa Zeiger in Beyond Consofótion, her study of the changing shapes of elegy from Swinburne to the present, "elegies have been more prolifically written, intensively studied, and resourcefully theorized than poems in practically any other traditional genre ___ Because of its privileged poetic status, elegy has been a primary site of critical renegotiation."9 This revival of interest in elegy as a "privileged" poetic genre has inexplicably overlooked, bypassed, or simply ignored "Thyrsis," which has received so little critical attention in recent decades that it seems doubtful whether it can still be regarded as one of Arnold's major poems. Peter Sacks is satisfied to give it only one and a half pages at the end of his chapter on Jn Memoriam in his major study of the English elegy.10 Even among Arnold's dwindling number of admirers, its position in his poetic canon has declined to the point that Alan Grob allows it less than a page in his recent study of Arnold's poetry, A Longing Like Despair: Arnold's Poetry of Pessimism (2002)." The only major analyses of it in the last twenty-five years are those by William E. Buckler in On the Poetry of Matthew Arnold: Essays in Critical Reconstruction (1982), by David G. Riede in Matthew Arnold and the Betrayal of Language (1988), and by W. David Shaw in Elegy & Paradox: Testing the Conventions (1994).12 A likely explanation for the decline of the poem's reputation is the widespread feeling among critics that by the time Arnold came to write a pastoral elegy in the second half of the nineteenth century, the form was outdated. Alastair Fowler's speculations about the death of literary genres in his essay "The Life and Death of Literary Forms" are particularly relevant to "Thyrsis": "Does a genre die when it ceases to be used? Or when it is no longer regarded with interest? Or when readers become insensitive to its form?"13 Although the pastoral elegy was not quite dead in 1866, after Arnold the genre quickly slipped from the repertoire of major poets, and serious readers of poetry no longer regarded it with interest. "In an age in which the Great Western Railway roared ever closer to the very center of Oxford," writes John Rosenberg, "pastoral had become an endangered species, threatening to collapse into potted Wordsworth or reheated Keats" (p. 149). Although many pastoral elegies would later be written to mourn soldiers killed in World War I, not a single one has survived as a canonical Great War poem. Owen's bitterly ironic "Anthem for Doomed Youth" answers to the modern requirements of an elegy. Yeats, after composing a pastoral elegy, "Shepherd and Goatherd," on the death of Robert Gregory, implicitly acknowledged the inappropriateness of the form by quickly composing "In Memory of Major Robert Gregory." If, as Fowler says, "the pastoral eclogue could not survive changes in the relation of town and country that followed urban development" (p. 207), it has seemed obvious to many poets as well as critics that neither could the pastoral elegy. "The old consoling formulae," as Peter Sacks observes, "now [i.e., post-War] seem not only obsolete but hypocritical. Few poets of this century have even tried to write such a poem."14 One cannot imagine W. H. Auden writing his latemodern "Elegy on the Death of William Butler Yeats" (1939) in the antique form of a pastoral elegy, casting himself as Corydon and Yeats as Thyrsis. If, however, we cease reading "Thyrsis" only as a pastoral elegy and instead read it as a transformation of the pastoral elegy into a Romantic lyric, the poem will seem less like a "throwback" to an earlier, antiquated form and more like what in fact it is- a mixed genre that subsumes the pastoral elegy within a new lyric genre that had attained its definitive form only sixty years earlier.
Recommended publications
  • Ttu Mac001 000057.Pdf (19.52Mb)
    (Vlatthew flrnold. From the pn/ture in tlic Oriel Coll. Coniinon liooni, O.vford. Jhc Oxford poems 0[ attfiew ("Jk SAoUi: S'ips\i' ani "Jli\j«'vs.'') Illustrated, t© which are added w ith the storv of Ruskin's Roa(d makers. with Glides t© the Country the p©em5 iljystrate. Portrait, Ordnance Map, and 76 Photographs. by HENRY W. TAUNT, F.R.G.S. Photographer to the Oxford Architectural anid Historical Society. and Author of the well-knoi^rn Guides to the Thames. &c., 8cc. OXFORD: Henry W, Taunl ^ Co ALI. RIGHTS REStHVED. xji^i. TAONT & CO. ART PRINTERS. OXFORD The best of thanks is ren(iered by the Author to his many kind friends, -who by their information and assistance, have materially contributed to the successful completion of this little ^rork. To Mr. James Parker, -who has translated Edwi's Charter and besides has added notes of the greatest value, to Mr. Herbert Hurst for his details and additions and placing his collections in our hands; to Messrs Macmillan for the very courteous manner in which they smoothed the way for the use of Arnold's poems; to the Provost of Oriel Coll, for Arnold's portrait; to Mr. Madan of the Bodleian, for suggestions and notes, to the owners and occupiers of the various lands over which •we traversed to obtain some of the scenes; to the Vicar of New Hinksey for details, and to all who have helped with kindly advice, our best and many thanks are given. It is a pleasure when a ^ivork of this kind is being compiled to find so many kind friends ready to help.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scholar-Gipsy Study Material
    The Scholar-Gipsy Study Material Summary “The Scholar-Gipsy” was written by poet and essayist Matthew Arnold in 1853. The poem is based on a story which was found in The Vanity of Dogmatizing (1661), written by Joseph Glanvil. The poem tells the story of a poor and disillusioned Oxford student who leaves university to join a group of traveling “gipsies” (Romani people). The Scholar-Gipsy wants not only to withdraw from his studies but also to withdraw from the modern world. He is so welcomed and becomes such a part of the "gipsy" family that they reveal some of their secrets to him. When he is discovered by two of his former Oxford peers, he tells them of how the Romani have their own unique way of learning. He plans to stay with them to learn as much as he can from them. He will then share their wisdom with the world, although he does not wish to return to that world himself. Arnold begins his poem by describing a rural setting just outside of Oxford. The speaker watches as a shepherd and reapers work in a field there. The speaker remains, enjoying the view of the fields and Oxford in the distance until the sun sets, his book lying beside him. Although the story (1661) was written two hundred years before the poem (1853), local people still claim to see the scholar-gipsy walking on the Berkshire moors: This said, he left them, and return'd no more.— But rumours hung about the country-side, That the lost Scholar long was seen to stray, Seen by rare glimpses, pensive and tongue-tied, In hat of antique shape, and cloak of grey, The same the gipsies wore.
    [Show full text]
  • Thyrsis Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) Is an English Poet and Critic Whose Works Represent the Victorian Intellect. He Was the Forem
    British Literature IV: Unit 3 – Poetry: Thyrsis Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) is an English poet and critic whose works represent the Victorian intellect. He was the foremost literary critic of his age. His poems are written in an elegiac, meditative mode. They cover a wide range of issues like the drawbacks of philosophy, war, death and the downfall of education. Some of his best poems are “The Scholar-Gipsy” (1853) and “Sohrab and Rustum” (1867). “The Study of Poetry” (1880) is his best critical essay in which he explains the Touchstone Method. “Thyrsis” (1866) is a pastoral elegy on the death of Arthur Hugh Clough, poet and his friend who died in 1861. “Thyrsis” is counted one of the best elegies alongside Milton’s Lycidas (1638) and Shelley’s Adonais (1821). A similar pastoral elegy is “Elegy Written on a Country Churchyard” by Thomas Gray. Arnold has borrowed the death of Thyrsis from Virgil’s Seventh Eclogue. In this classical poem, shepherds Thyrsis and Corydon enter a singing contest, in which Corydon wins. Defeat breaks the heart of Thyrsis and he dies. Virgil blames the gods but Arnold believes that Thyrsis made a mistake by taking Corydon as an opponent. Arnold’s Thyrsis is none other than his friend Arthur Hugh Clough, who made a similar mistake of searching for the truth. Arnold begins the poem with an environmental concern. Once his friend Thyrsis and he visited Oxford country and it was green and beautiful. Now, the beautiful landscape is replaced with a busy city. He searches for an elm tree that had been their meeting spot.
    [Show full text]
  • Sch00l of Distance Educat10n
    UNIVERSITY OF CALiCUT 14 SCH00L OF DISTANCE EDUCAT10N STUDY MATERIALS M.A.ENGLISH (PREVIOUS) (1 997 Adnlissio甲 ) | PAPER Ⅲ BRITISH LITERATURE SURVEV:FROM THE ViCTOR:AN‐ AGE T0 1940 ,Copy Bights Reserued (」 UP/3031/05/1ⅨЮだDE‐ 1 4 B.DRAMA f.力χおルr Sr2の 加D′ralJ PAPER‖ :BR:TiSH L:TERATURE SURVEY IS E‖ ot Murder in The Cathedral FROM THE ViCTOR:AN AGE T0 1940 2.2xお ル ″G′″´rar S餞ゥ G B Shaw St.Joan Max Marks:120 」.M Synge Riders to the Sea Sean O'Casey Juno and the Paycock A POETRY Cristopher Fry The Lady is not for Burning f.■潔Jars滋 のiZ`′ガJ C.PROSE AND FlCT:ON Alfred,Lord Tennyson "The Lotos Eaters" Robert Brown!ng "Andrea Del Sarto" l. Texts for Sturly in detail Matthew Arnold "Dover Beach" Virginia Woolf Modern Fiction Thomas Hardy "The Darkling Thrush" 2. Texts for General Study G M Hopkins 1 . "The Windhover" Matthew Arnold Pretace to 1853 poems 2. "No Worst, there is none" Emily Bronte Wuthering Heights W B Yeats 1."Easter1916" Charles Dickens Hard Times 2. "Among Schoolchildren" George Eliot The Mill one the Floss 3. "Byzantium" Thonas Hardy Mazor of Casterbridge IS E‖ ot "The Love-Song of Alfred Joseph Conrad Heart o, Darkness "Little Gidding" James Joyce A portrait o{ the Artist as a Young Man W H Auden "The Shield of Achilles" D.H.Lawrence Sons and Lovers 2.ル名おル (ル り Virginia Woolf To the Lighthouse 「 "araI Sa“ Robert Browning "Porphyria's Lover" Arno:d "The Scholar-Gypsy" c M Hopkins "Felix Randal" W B Yeats "Lapis Lazuli" Break up: 4 Annotations + 3 Essays + ssh.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English Faculty of Graduate Studies London, Ontario
    "But Clear As Words Can Make Revealing? Arnold's Language and the Struggle for Transparency Dan S. Kline Department of English Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario August 1997 @ Dan S. Kline 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale (*m ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliograohiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Ottawa ON K 1A ON4 Canaûa Canada Your Çk, Votie reierenw Our fi& Noire retarence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permehant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fih, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in ths thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be p~tedor otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract In the 1853 "PrefaceN to the Poems, Matthew Arnold argues that the poet should adopt the "grand style" to assist in the production of a type of poetry that is content-driven. The precise nature and meaning of the "grand style" remains one of the more elusive problems in Arnold scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • MATTHEW ARNOLD the HEROIC DIMENSIONS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial
    37/ MATTHEW ARNOLD THE HEROIC DIMENSIONS OF MAN'S BEST SELF THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Connie J. DeShane, B. S. Denton, Texas December, 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION.. ........ ., 1 The Problem Definition of Terms Sources of Data Method of Procedure Significance of the Problem II. INDUSTRY AND SOCIETY IN THE NINETEENTHCENTURY .. .... ... 13 Scientific and Technological Advances The Social and Political Milieu III. RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY. 31 The Decline of Traditional Beliefs The Search for New Meaning IV. ROMANCE AND REASON-... .-...... -a 51 V. THE COLLECTIVE SELF. .. 6 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY. , . 80 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The Problem Matthew Arnold instructed his friend Arthur Hugh Clough: "resolve to be thyself." The quotation is from one of Arnold's own poems of 1850 censuring Clough for his ambiva- lence. The phrase is a synthesis of Socrates' "Know thyself" and Thomas Carlyle's "Know what thou canst work at." In Sartor Resartus Carlyle refuted the possibility of the Socratic imperative, but Arnold's eclecticism permitted him to vary the original in order to accommodate both theories. A study of the poetry reveals what Lionel Trilling calls Arnold's "eclectic and dialectical method."1 This practice of taking the best from existing theories while formulating his own permeates the works of Matthew Arnold. Unlike Clough, who doubted his own teachings and was in a constant flux of opinion, Arnold managed a certain flexi- bility that allowed him to reassess a changing world without nullifying his own basic assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Depths and "Dover Beach" Author(S): Norman N
    Psychological Depths and "Dover Beach" Author(s): Norman N. Holland Source: Victorian Studies, Vol. 9, Supplement (Sep., 1965), pp. 4-28 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3825594 Accessed: 26-06-2016 20:16 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3825594?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Indiana University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Victorian Studies This content downloaded from 137.99.31.134 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:16:25 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Norman N. Holland PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEPTHS AND "DOVER BEACH" SYCHOANALYSIS AND LITERARY ANALYSIS have mingled uneasily ever since 15 October 1897, when Freud simultaneously found in himself and in Hamlet "love of the mother and jealousy of the father." Psychoanalysis, it turned out, could say many interesting things about plays and novels. Unfortunately, it did not do at all well with the analysis of poems. In the symbolistic psychoanalysis of 1915 or so, poems became simply assemblages of the masculine or feminine symbols into which psychoanalysis seemed then to divide the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scholar's “Fight to Find the Lost Element”
    ISSN 1798-4769 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1325-1332, November 2015 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.21 The Validity of the Vision: The Scholar’s “Fight to Find the Lost Element” Bahee Hadaegh Shiraz University, Iran Abstract—In the context of Anorld’s poetic landscape, the “forest glade” is gone and the “glimmering sea is far beyond the reach of people who are wandering in the “darkling plain” where the genuine self is buried. The inability to find the genuine self, brought about by loss of hope, made the inhabitants of the “burning plain” continue their oscillations between the frustrating world and what they unconsciously felt to be its essential existence. It is actually because of this lack of courage that Empedocles suspends his own life. The inhabitants of the “burning desert” wait passively, and the culture simultaneously wait for the light; they are shown as awaiting some revolution, but they are in a mood of “not being” or in a continual disappointment, without specific purpose. The aim of this essay is to show the changes in the passive, meditative mood of Arnold’s characters who begin the active life of the quest to find the genuine self. This quest begins with the story of “The Scholar Gipsy”. Index Terms—The Scholar Gipsy, Anorld’s poetic landscape, lost element, quest I. INTRODUCTION The unhealthy situation of Victorian life in Arnold’s poetic world is demonstrated this way: All his store of sad experience he Lays bare of wretched days; Tell us his misery’s birth and growth and signs, And now the dying spark of hope was fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Arnold 1 Matthew Arnold
    Matthew Arnold 1 Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold, by Elliott & Fry, circa 1883. Born 24 December 1822 Laleham, Middlesex, England Died 15 April 1888 (aged 65) Liverpool, England Occupation Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools Nationality British Period Victorian Genres Poetry; Literary, Social and Religious Criticism Notable work(s) "Dover Beach", "The Scholar-Gipsy", "Thyrsis", Culture and Anarchy, Literature and Dogma Spouse(s) Frances Lucy Children Thomas Trevenen Richard Lucy Eleanore Basil Matthew Arnold (24 December 1822 – 15 April 1888) was a British poet and cultural critic who worked as an inspector of schools. He was the son of Thomas Arnold, the famed headmaster of Rugby School, and brother to both Tom Arnold, literary professor, and William Delafield Arnold, novelist and colonial administrator. Matthew Arnold has been characterized as a sage writer, a type of writer who chastises Family tree and instructs the reader on contemporary social issues.[1] Matthew Arnold 2 Early years The Reverend John Keble, who would become one of the leaders of the Oxford Movement, stood as godfather to Matthew. "Thomas Arnold admired Keble's 'hymns' in The Christian Year, only reversing himself with exasperation when this old friend became a Romeward-tending 'High Church' reactionary in the 1830s."[2] In 1828, Arnold's father was appointed Headmaster of Rugby School and his young family took up residence, that year, in the Headmaster's house. In 1831, Arnold was tutored by his uncle, the Reverend John Buckland, at Laleham, Middlesex. In 1834, the Arnolds occupied a holiday home, Fox How, in the Lake District. William Wordsworth was a neighbour and close friend.
    [Show full text]
  • In Victorian Desert
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy July 2015 Pioneers of “Dawnism” in Victorian Desert Bahee Hadaegh Shiraz University [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p340 Abstract Arnold more than any other Victorian writer sums up for the reader the most typical qualities of the age. He shows the movement of thought in man in relation to the age. Arnold depicts the intellectual, cultural, religious and literary confusion of the age and calls it the “darkling plain. Throughout Arnold’s poetic career he tries to connect internal integrity with the social lives of men who are alone in an alien world. “The Scholar Gipsy” brings a sense of contemplation back to the frozen minds of the Victorian Utilitarianism. Although the images of hopes in “The Scholar Gipsy” done by the visionary quest and the Tyrian Trader put an end to the life-long doubt-stricken Victorian men, they are only the demonstrations without any palpable, real application in the wasteland of the age. Sohrab in Sohrab and Rustum is a servant of God who struggles to enter the territory of his father. It is his own lost origin to which he enters and consequently finds peace and joins the ‘All.’ Here, Sohrab is the son who is under the ageis of Thomas Arnold, the father, a triumphant practical spirit guiding the inhabitants of the darkness to the light. If “The Scholar Gipsy” is the renovation of man’s spirit from the uncertainty through the suggestion of a vision, and a ‘beacon of hope.’ Sohrab and Rustum is Arnold’s achieved vision and the real capture of the genuine self through the open involvement of the committed traveller in the way of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • SOHRAB and RUSTUM and OTHER POEMS Page 1 of 132
    MATTHEW ARNOLD'S SOHRAB AND RUSTUM AND OTHER POEMS Page 1 of 132 [p.2][p.10][p.12][p.17][p.21][p.23][p.25][p.28][p.30][p.32][p.35][p.37][p.39][p.45][p.46][p.47][p.48][p.51][[p.62][p.66][p.70][p.72][p.74][p.77][p.79][p.80][p.87][p.90][p.91][p.95][p.98][p.104][p.106][p.111][p.113][p.123][p.125][p.131][p.ix][p.xii][p.xiii][p.xiv][p.xv][p.xvi][p.xvii][p.xviii][p.xix][p.xx][p.xxi][p.xxii][p.xxiii][p.xxiv][p.xxv][p.xxvi][p.xxvii][p.xxviii][p.xxix][p.xxx][p.xxxi][p.xxxiii][p.xxxiv][p.xxxv][p.xxxvi][p.xxxvii][p.xxxviii][p.xxxix][p.xl][p.55][p.63][p.99][p.116][p.119][p.149][p.150][p.151][p.152][p.153][p.154][p.155][p.156][p.157][p.158][p.159][p.160][p.161][p.162][p.163][p.164][p.165][p.166][p.167][p.168][p.169][p.170][p.171][p.172][p.173][p.174][p.175][p.176][p.177][p.178][p.179][p.180][p.181][p.182][p.183][p.184][p.185][p.186][p.187][p.188][p.189][p.190][p.191][p.192][p.193][p.194][p.195][p.196][p.197][p.198][p.199][p.200][p.201][p.202][p.203][p.204][p.205][p.206][p.207][p.208][p.209][p.210][p.211][p.213]p.xxxii]p.53] The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matthew Arnold's Sohrab and Rustum and Other Poems, by Matthew Arnold [p.217] This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • "An Oxford Elegy" and "Epithalamion"
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1997 A Study of Ralph Vaughan Williams's "An Oxford Elegy" and "Epithalamion". Robert Joseph Taylor Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Taylor, Robert Joseph, "A Study of Ralph Vaughan Williams's "An Oxford Elegy" and "Epithalamion"." (1997). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6647. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6647 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]