8VXUSDWLRQRI6WDWXVDQG6WDWXV6\PEROVLQWKH5RPDQ(PSLUH $XWKRU V 0H\HU5HLQKROG 5HYLHZHGZRUN V 6RXUFH+LVWRULD=HLWVFKULIWI¾U$OWH*HVFKLFKWH%G+ QG4WU SS 3XEOLVKHGE\Franz Steiner Verlag 6WDEOH85/http://www.jstor.org/stable/4435195 . $FFHVVHG Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Franz Steiner Verlag is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. http://www.jstor.org USURPATION OF STATUS AND STATUS SYMBOLS IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE* The basic organizational principle of the social systems of the ancient world was hierarchic structure, but social mobility existed in varying de- grees. Roman society evolved into one of the most hierarchic and status- conscious social orders in mankind's history. In the imperial period, under the influence of the sociopolitical philosophy of Augustus, the Romans de- veloped the highest degree and diversity of formal social stratification,, and at the same time the highest incidence of social mobility in antiquity. This social elasticity - conservative and limited though it was, but greater than in any other culture until modern times - is ". the special characteristic of the Roman state that distinguished it from all other states of the ancient world.