DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 GE.20-06350(E) Human Rights Council Thirty-Fourth Session

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 GE.20-06350(E) Human Rights Council Thirty-Fourth Session United Nations A/HRC/34/2 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 May 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-fourth session 27 February–24 March 2017 Agenda item 1 Organizational and procedural matters Report of the Human Rights Council on its thirty-fourth session Vice-President and Rapporteur: Mouayed Saleh (Iraq) GE.20-06350(E) A/HRC/34/2 Contents Chapter Page Part One: Resolutions, decisions and President’s statement adopted by the Human Rights Council at its thirty-fourth session ............................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Resolutions .................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Decisions ....................................................................................................................................... 7 III. President’s statement ..................................................................................................................... 8 Part Two: Summary of proceedings .................................................................................................................... 9 I. Organizational and procedural matters .......................................................................................... 9 A. Opening and duration of the session ..................................................................................... 9 B. Attendance ............................................................................................................................ 9 C. High-level segment ............................................................................................................... 9 D. General segment ................................................................................................................... 12 E. Organization of work ............................................................................................................ 13 F. Meetings and documentation ................................................................................................ 13 G. Visits ..................................................................................................................................... 13 H. Election of members of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee ........................... 14 I. Selection and appointment of mandate holders .................................................................... 14 J. Adoption of the report on the session ................................................................................... 14 II. Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General ................................................. 15 A. Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights ...................... 15 B. Reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General ....................... 16 C. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 17 III. Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development ........................................................................ 19 A. Panel discussions .................................................................................................................. 19 B. Enhanced interactive dialogue on the human rights of migrants .......................................... 25 C. Interactive dialogues with special procedure mandate holders ............................................. 26 D. Interactive dialogues with special representatives of the Secretary-General ........................ 34 E. Open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights ................................................ 36 F. General debate on agenda item 3 .......................................................................................... 36 G. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 38 IV. Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention ........................................................ 52 A. Panel discussions .................................................................................................................. 52 B. Interactive dialogue with the commission of inquiry on Burundi ......................................... 53 C. Interactive dialogue with the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic ........................................................................................................... 53 D. Interactive dialogue with the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan ..................... 54 E. Interactive dialogues with special procedure mandate holders ............................................. 54 2 A/HRC/34/2 F. General debate on agenda item 4 .......................................................................................... 56 G. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 58 V. Human rights bodies and mechanisms .......................................................................................... 62 A. Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law ................................................. 62 B. Forum on Minority Issues ..................................................................................................... 62 C. Social Forum ......................................................................................................................... 62 D. Special procedure mandate holders ...................................................................................... 62 E. General debate on agenda item 5 .......................................................................................... 62 VI. Universal periodic review ............................................................................................................. 64 A. Consideration of the universal periodic review outcomes .................................................... 64 B. General debate on agenda item 6 .......................................................................................... 120 C. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 121 VII. Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories ...................................... 123 A. Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 ..................................................................... 123 B. Reports of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Secretary-General ..................................................................................................... 123 C. General debate on agenda item 7 .......................................................................................... 123 D. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 124 VIII. Follow-up to and implementation of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action ............. 128 A. General debate on agenda item 8 .......................................................................................... 128 IX. Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, follow-up to and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action ......................................... 130 A. Debate on racial profiling and incitement to hatred .............................................................. 130 B. General debate on agenda item 9 .......................................................................................... 131 C. Consideration of and action on draft proposals .................................................................... 132 X. Technical assistance and capacity-building ................................................................................... 135 A. Interactive dialogue on cooperation with and assistance to Ukraine in the field of human rights ....................................................................................................... 135 B. Interactive dialogue on strengthening technical cooperation and advisory services for Guinea ............................................................................................................................. 135 C. Interactive dialogue on the situation of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo ......................................................................................................................... 136 D. Interactive dialogue on technical assistance and capacity-building to improve human rights in Libya ........................................................................................................... 136 E. Interactive dialogues with special procedure mandate holders ............................................. 137 F. General debate on agenda item 10 ........................................................................................ 138 G. Consideration of and action on draft proposals. ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geneva Barometer 07-2020 EN FINAL
    July 2020 Multilateral Dialogue Geneva Geneva Barometer Developments in Geneva’s International Organisations Mid-May 2020 – Mid-July 2020 , Olaf Wientzek, Diana Peters, Sarah Ultes, Theresa Landmann The “Geneva Barometer” takes an occasional look at a few selected developments amongst the international organ- isations based in Geneva. Things have been heating up in international Geneva Azevêdo, some countries called for a candidate from an since the middle of May: The World Health Organisation industrialised country. Conversely it was not only the Af- (WHO), which continues to fight COVID-19 and to imple- rican group that argued that it was time for the first Afri- ment the demands of the World Health Assembly can Director-General of the WTO. Still others argued that (WHA), has had to absorb a serious blow with the US's it was high time for the first election of a woman. notice of withdrawal. In the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the race to find a successor to the Director Gen- Worthy of note: The EU is not putting forward any candi- eral Azevêdo, who is stepping down on the 31st of Au- dates although the names of several high-ranking people, gust, has gathered momentum. At the same time, day- both women and men, were under discussion. The Irish to-day business is also gaining momentum in the Geneva EU Trade Commissioner Phil Hogan (EVP), had also for all organisations - among other things, there were several intents and purposes indicated his interest in the post. controversial debates at the Human Rights Council. However, when the candidature was expected in Geneva, Hogan declared his renouncement.
    [Show full text]
  • Director General of the Wto: the Past, Present and Future
    DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE WTO: THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE Rishabha Meena James J. Nedumpara Siddharth S. Aatreya Discussion Paper No. 9/2020 CENTRE FOR TRADE AND INVESTMENT LAW Disclaimer The views expressed in this background paper represent those of the authors and DISCUSSION PAPER is a product of research conducted at the Centre for Trade and Investment Law, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade. The views reflected in this paper cannot be attributed to the Government of India or any of its officials. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE WTO: THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE Abstract The Director-General of the WTO is, in many ways, the face of the institution and a spokesperson to the international community. The Director-General plays a vital role in maintaining the stature and profile of WTO as an international organization responsible for ensuring free trade. The Director-General has multiple roles—as a mediator, administrator, facilitator and negotiator. The role of the Director-General has transformed over the years with varying degrees of involvement in the negotiation and dispute resolution functions of the WTO. Interventions by the Director-General, however, have often proved useful to the development of the institution and the WTO legal order. Mr. Azevêdo’s recent resignation has triggered a widespread debate on who his successor should be and how the new Director-General should discharge his responsibilities, especially in light of many ongoing crises – most prominently, a weakened global trading order and COVID-19. In this context, this paper analyses the WTO legal framework on the role of the DG, and makes a comparative assessment of the demographic and qualifications-based markers for the appointment of the next Director-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections 2019 in Moldova: New Challenges and New Opportunities for Cooperation Within Ukraine-Moldova-Romania Triangle
    ELECTIONS 2019 IN MOLDOVA: NEW CHALLENGES AND NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR COOPERATION WITHIN UKRAINE-MOLDOVA-ROMANIA TRIANGLE POLICY PAPER 2 2 Policy Paper INTRODUCTION AUTHORS TEAM General editing: Sergiy Gerasymchuk Angela Gramada, director, Experts for Security and Global Affairs Association (Romania) Armand Goșu, associate professor, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Political Science (Romania) Denis Cenușa, researcher, Institute for Political Science Justus-Liebig University (Giessen, Germany), Associat- ed expertiIn the think-tank “Expert-Grup”, contributor news agency IPN (Moldova) Hanna Shelest, head of International Security Studies department, Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” Hennadiy Maksak, director, Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism”, Ukrainian National Platform coordinator of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum Ileana Racheru, researcher, Romanian Diplomatic Institute Nadia Bureiko, expert, Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” Natalia Stercul, program director, Department of Eastern Studies: Ukraine and Russia, Foreign Policy Associa- tion of Moldova Sergiy Gerasymchuk, head of the South-Eastern Europe Studies department, Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” Viviana Anghel, associate lecturer, National School of Political Science and Public Administration, faculty of Political Science (Romania) Vlad Lupan, Independent Expert; ex-Ambassador & Permanent Representative of the Republic of Moldova to the United Nations Elections 2019 in Moldova 3 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS MOLDOVA: THE TEST FOR THE DEMOCRATIC
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with Security in a World in Which Nothing Is Safe NEWSLETTER
    Foreign Policy Association together with Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung offer you a newsletter on foreign policy and European integration issues of the Republic of Moldova. The newsletter is part of the “Foreign Policy Dialogue” joint Project. NEWSLETTER MONTHLY BULLETIN APRIL 2019 NR.3 (157) Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates The newsletter is developed by Sorina Ştefârţă, editor-coordinator TOPICS OF THE EDITION: 1. Stela Jantuan, political analyst: “There are a lot of elements that create this puzzle of insecurity in the “MD” version” 2. Editorial by Victoria Bucataru, executive director of APE: “From an uncertain zone to security generator: a long way for us to take the first step” 3. Dumitru Țâra, media expert: “In terms of information security, the Republic of Moldova is a wide-open and fence-free courtyard” 4. Looking from the outside. Helga Maria Schmid, Secretary General of the EEAS: “A more assertive EU in a volatile world” News in Brief The development of bilateral relations in areas of common interest - this was the key topic of the recent meeting between Prime Minister Playing with security in a world Pavel Filip and US Ambassador Derek J. Hogan in Chisinau. Pavel Filip mentioned the importance of bilateral cooperation with the USA, which is a strategic partner of our country, and expressed gratitude for the constant support provided to the implementation of democratic and structural reforms and the strengthening of institutional capacities. The in which nothing is safe officials discussed also the continuation of the programme with the IMF, the local public administration reform and the expansion of the commercial-economic collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter on Foreign Policy and European Integration Issues of the Republic of Moldova
    Foreign Policy Association together with Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung offer you a newsletter on foreign policy and European integration issues of the Republic of Moldova. The newsletter is part of the “Foreign Policy Dialogue” joint Project. NEWSLETTER MONTHLY BULLETIN AUGUST 2018 NR.6 (148) Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates The newsletter is developed by Sorina Ştefârţă, editor-coordinator TOPICS OF THE EDITION: 1. Dumitru Diacov, honourable chairman of the Democratic Party of Moldova: For many years to come, both Moscow and Bucharest and other powers will be having interests here 2. Editorial by Victoria Bucătaru, executive director of APE:27 years of Transition, 27 years of Uncertainty 3. Vasile Nedelciuc, deputy in the first Parliament and one of the authors of the Declaration of Independence:Today the mood has only one name: Leaving 4. Opinion of Parties:Republic of Moldova and its 27 Years of Independence: Expectations vs. Reality News in Brief “Moldova is stronger in its international relations”, said Andrian Candu, speaker of Moldovan One Independence, parliament, at the end of the Parliament’s spring session. According to him, our country is no longer so vulnerable, while the external relations are pragmatic, based on respect and cooperation. In this context, he reminded of the US Congress Several Aspirations Resolution that the United States supports the territorial integrity and political sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia and Sorina Ștefârță reaffirms its support for the democratically elected governments and the people of the three countries. He also spoke about creation of the Parliamentary Slowly and sometimes in an Assembly of Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine (whose first session will take place in September in Georgia), uncertain way, the Republic of but also about energy security, highlighting in this Moldova has reached its 27th context the two interconnection projects- to the anniversary of Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 9 May 2018
    United Nations E/FFDF/2018/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 9 May 2018 Original: English Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up 23–26 April 2018 Report of the Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up I. Matter calling for action by the Economic and Social Council or brought to its attention 1. The Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up recommends that the Economic and Social Council transmit to the high- level political forum on sustainable development, convened under the auspices of the Council, the following intergovernmentally agreed conclusions and recommendations: Follow-up and review of the financing for development outcomes and the means of implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 1. We, ministers and high-level representatives, having met in New York at United Nations Headquarters from 23 to 26 April 2018 at the third Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up, express our resolve to continue to work towards the full and timely implementation of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, which builds on the 2002 Monterrey Consensus and the 2008 Doha Declaration on Financing for Development. We reiterate our goal to end poverty and hunger, and to achieve sustainable development in its three dimensions through promoting inclusive economic growth, protecting the environment and fostering social inclusion. We recall that the Addis Ababa Action Agenda provides a global framework for financing sustainable development and is an integral part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, contextualizing its means of implementation targets with concrete policies and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERINŢA ŞTIINŢIFICĂ 7-8 Noiembrie 2019
    UNIVERSITATEA DE STAT DIN MOLDOVA CONFERINŢA ŞTIINŢIFICĂ NAŢIONALĂ CU PARTICIPARE INTERNAŢIONALĂ INTEGRARE PRIN CERCETARE ŞI INOVARE 7-8 noiembrie 2019 Rezumate ale comunicărilor Științe sociale Volumul II Chişinău – 2019 Universitatea de Stat din Moldova CONFERINŢA ŞTIINŢIFICĂ NAŢIONALĂ CU PARTICIPARE INTERNAŢIONALĂ INTEGRARE PRIN CERCETARE ŞI INOVARE 7-8 noiembrie 2019 Rezumate ale comunicărilor Științe sociale Volumul II CEP USM Chişinău – 2019 082:378(478-25)=00 I-58 378.4=135.1=111=16.1I-58CONFERINŢA ŞTIINŢIFICĂ NAŢIONALĂ CU PARTICIPARE INTERNAŢIONALĂ „INTEGRARE PRIN CERCETARE ŞI INOVARE” Comitetul de organizare: Gheorghe Ciocanu Rector USM, dr. hab., prof.univ. Florentin Paladi Prorector pentru activitatea ştiinţifică, dr. hab., prof.univ. Constantin Marin Președinte al Consiliului științific al USM, dr. hab., prof. univ. Valentina Nicorici Decan al Facultăţii de Fizică și Inginerie, dr., conf.univ. Galina Rusu Decan al Facultăţii de Matematică şi Informatică, dr., conf.univ. Mihai Leşanu Decan al Facultăţii de Biologie şi Pedologie, dr., conf. univ. Viorica Gladchi Decan al Facultăţii de Chimie şi Tehnologie Chimică, dr., conf. univ. Sergiu Brînză Decan al Facultăţii de Drept, dr. hab., prof. univ. Sergiu Matveev Decan al Facultăţii de Istorie şi Filosofie, dr., conf. univ. Georgeta Stepanov Decan al Facultăţii de Jurnalism şi Ştiinţe ale Comunicării, dr. hab., conf. univ. Viorica Lifari Decan al Facultăţii de Limbi şi Literaturi Străine, dr., conf. univ. Adriana Cazacu Decan al Facultăţii de Litere, dr., conf. univ. Vladimir Guţu Decan al Facultăţii de Psihologie, Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei, Sociologie şi Asistenţă Socială, dr.hab., prof.univ. Alexandru Solcan Decan al Facultăţii de Relaţii Internaţionale, Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative, dr., conf.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in the Republic of Moldova +41(0)22 91705 +41(0)22 91744 Needs Assessment
    UNECE Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in the Republic of Moldova Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in the Republic of Moldova trade barriers to Regulatory and procedural Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Regulatory and Procedural Barriers Regulatory and Procedural to Trade in the Republic of Moldova Trade to Information Service United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNITED NATIONS UNITED Palais des Nations CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland ISBN 978-92-1-117134-1 Telephone: +41(0)22 917 44 44 Fax: +41(0)22 917 05 05 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unece.org Layout and Printing at United Nations, Geneva – 1718053 (E) – August 2017 – 693 – ECE/TRADE/433 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in the Republic of Moldova Needs Assessment United Nations New York and Geneva, 2017 2 Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in the Republic of Moldova: Needs Assessment Note The designation employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. This publication will be issued in English, Romanian and Russian. ECE/TRADE/433 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.17.II.E.13 ISBN: 978-92-1-117134-1 e-ISBN: 978-92-1-361399-3 Copyright © 2017 United Nations All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS publication issued by the Economic Commission for Europe Foreword 3 Foreword A small landlocked country, the Republic of Moldova remains one of the poorest countries in South East Europe, with the economy showing continued dependence on low value-added manufacturing and agriculture along with remittances from workers abroad for income generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections 2019 in Moldova: New Challenges and New Opportunities for Cooperation Within Ukraine-Moldova-Romania Triangle
    INTRODUCTION Decentralization without democratization or why local democracy matters? 1 ELECTIONS 2019 IN MOLDOVA: NEW CHALLENGES AND NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR COOPERATION WITHIN UKRAINE-MOLDOVA-ROMANIA TRIANGLE NOVEMBER 2018 This expert analysis was conducted under the coordination of Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” with the support of the European Union and the International Renaissance Foundation within the framework of the Civic Synergy Project and under the auspices of the Ukrainian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. Its content is the exclusive responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union and the International Renaissance Foundation The International Renaissance Foundation The International Renaissance Foundation is one of the largest charitable foundations in Ukraine. Since 1990 we have been helping to develop an open society based on democratic values in Ukraine. During its activity, the Foundation has supported about 20 thousand projects, to which more than 60 thousand activists and organizations of Ukraine have joined. The funding amounted to over $ 200 million. www.irf.ua www.fb.com/irf.ukraine Civic Synergy Project The Civic Synergy Project is aimed at strengthening public participation in the implementation of European integration reforms in Ukraine, through capacity-building and boosting of activities of the Ukrainian Side of the EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform (US CSP) and the Ukrainian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Received Bynsd/FARA Registration Unit 01/28/2018 3:45:13 PM
    Received byNSD/FARA Registration Unit 01/28/2018 3:45:13 PM From: Todd Webster Sent: Friday, Januaryl26, 2018 2:10 PM To: jennifer_o'neil Cc: Renee Roig Subject: Mtg request - Foreign Minister of Moldova Attachments: CV Tudor ULIANOVSCHI[3].DOC Dear Jen: The Foreign Minister of Moldova, Tudor Ulianovschi, will be visiting Washington on Wednesday, January 31st and we would like to request a meeting with the Senator. Given Senator Johnson's Chairmanship of the European subcommittee of SFRC, Minister Ulianovschi would be honored to have an audience with him. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and Moldova, the reforms being undertaken by the coalition government to align Moldova more closely with the west, as well as the continued Russian interference in Moldova. The current pro-western Moldovan government has undertaken significant reforms over the past two years in an effort to move Moldova closer to the E.U. ancl the U.S. The coalition government is working to implement a broad set ofreforms across the government, including public aclministration and the judicial, banking, and agriculture sectors, as well as enacting new public integrity laws to fight corruption. As importantly, Moldova is combatting Russian interference throughout the country on several levels. Russia wants to stop Moldova's move towards the west. Not only does Russia have 10,000 troops amassed on the country's eastern border in Transnistria, but also there is a concerted and ongoing effort to undermine western values through Russia's sophisticated propaganda efforts. · Foreign Minister Ulianovschi will be in Washington on the afternoon of Wednesday, January 31st and would welcome the chance to meet with the Senator.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Moldova in the Framework of the Eastern Partnership and Prospects for Relations with the Russian Federation
    Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Seria Relaţii Internaţionale şi Studii Europene, TOM X, pag. 143-169 THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP AND PROSPECTS FOR RELATIONS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Victoria GOREAINOV* Mircea BRIE** Abstract. This paper is an in-depth analysis of the role of the Republic of Moldova in the Eastern Partnership and its influence on relations with the Russian Federation. The analysis of the role of the Republic of Moldova in the Eastern Partnership and the prospects for relations with the Russian Federation are necessary, given that the interests of the European Union and Russia intersect in Eastern Europe, and Moldova has been in the past 10 years between East and West. In the situation created Moldova finds itself between two regional powers – the EU and Russia. The European Union, as well as the Russian Federation, are major partners for the Republic of Moldova, and the orientation to the east or west often depends on political desire. The Republic of Moldova is one of the countries in Eastern Europe where Russia, by various methods, tries to maintain its influence, directing all forces against the EU enlargement to the East. In the context of the Republic of Moldova’s rapprochement with the EU, the main geostrategic interest of the Russian Federation is to maintain control over the former Soviet republics. And in order to maintain its status of great power, Russia needs to maintain its influence, including its military presence in Moldova, as a tool for exerting political pressure. However, the current reality, namely that the draft resolution proposed by the Republic of Moldova on “The complete and unconditional withdrawal of foreign military forces on the territory of the Republic of Moldova” was adopted at the UN General Assembly on June 22, 2018, questions the continuation of the presence Russian military in the Transnistrian region.
    [Show full text]
  • India-Moldova Relations
    India-Moldova Relations India recognized Moldova on December 28, 1991 and diplomatic relations were established on March 20, 1992. India-Moldova relations are friendly and cordial. India and Moldova co-operate well on matters of mutual interest at multilateral fora. Moldova usually accredits its Ambassador in Baku, Azerbaijan, concurrently to India. India accredits its Ambassador in Bucharest. India-Moldova Foreign Office Consultations has been instituted and one session was held in January 2003 in Chisinau. Moldova has been supportive of Indian candidatures in multilateral fora. Minister of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Mr. D. V. Sadananda Gowda visited Moldova, 2-4 November 2016, during which he had wide-ranging discussions with the then President, Mr. Nicolae Timofti, Prime Miniter, Mr. Pavel Filip, Deputy PM and Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration, Mr. Andrei Galbur, Minister of Information Technology and Communications, Mr. Vasile Botnari and with the Ministries of Health, Economy, Education, and Regional Development and Construction. He also delivered a public lecture at the Moldova State University. The last substantive visit from MEA was that of MOS (PK) Mrs. Preneet Kaur who visited Moldova from 22-25 September 2013 on an official visit. In addition to call on the President and Prime Minister, she had substantive meeting with the FM during which bilateral and multilateral issues were discussed. During her meeting with the Health Minister, MOS raised the problems faced by Indian pharmaceutical companies in Moldova concerning registration of new drugs. Another proposal regarding linkage of State Medical University of Moldova with a Medical College in India was also discussed.
    [Show full text]