DOCSLIB.ORG

Convective Power Loss Measurements in a Field Reversed Configuration with Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convective Power Loss Measurements in a Field Reversed Configuration with Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive Convective Power Loss Measurements in a Field Reversed Configuration with Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive Paul Melnik A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Alan L. Hoffman, Chair Richard D. Milroy Brian A. Nelson Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics ©Copyright 2014 Paul Melnik University of Washington Abstract Convective Power Loss Measurements in a Field Reversed Configuration with Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive Paul Melnik Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Alan L. Hoffman Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics The Translation, Confinement, and Sustainment Upgrade (TCSU) experiment achieves direct formation and sustainment of a field reversed configuration (FRC) plasma through rotating magnetic fields (RMF). The pre-ionized gas necessary for FRC formation is supplied by a magnetized cascade arc source that has been developed for TCSU. To ensure ideal FRC performance, the condition of the vacuum chamber prior to RMF start- up has been characterized with the use of a fast response ion gauge. A circuit capable of gating the puff valves with initial high voltage for quick response and then indefinite operational voltage was also designed. A fully translatable combination Langmuir / Mach probe was also built to measure the electron temperature, electron density, and ion velocity of the FRC. These measurements were also successfully completed in the FRC exhaust jets allowing for an accurate analysis of the FRC power loss through convection. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I: Introduction to plasma confinement and the TCSU experiment .......................1 1.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1 1.2 The field reversed configuration ..............................................................................3 1.2.1 FRC introduction ...........................................................................................3 1.2.2 FRTP formation .............................................................................................5 1.2.3 RMF formation and current drive..................................................................6 1.3 The Translation, Confinement, and Sustainment Upgrade Experiment ..................7 Chapter II: Fast response ion gauge (FIG)........................................................................14 2.1 FIG design and operation.......................................................................................14 2.2 TCSU puff valve analysis ......................................................................................18 Chapter III: Magnetized cascade arc source .....................................................................23 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................23 3.2 Puff valve driver circuit .........................................................................................31 Chapter IV: Combination probe design and theory ..........................................................34 4.1 Combination probe design .....................................................................................34 4.2 Double Langmuir probe theory..............................................................................40 Chapter V: Combination probe on TCSU.........................................................................49 5.1 Probe installation on TCSU ...................................................................................49 5.2 Probe operation in TCSU.......................................................................................53 Chapter VI: Combination probe results ............................................................................62 6.1 FRC parameters for even and odd parity RMF operation......................................62 6.2 Combination probe data for the 122 kHz even-parity FRC ...................................67 6.2.1 FRC midplane results..........................................................................................67 6.2.2 Results from the north exhaust jet (even-parity FRC).................................81 6.2.3 Results from the south exhaust jet (even-parity FRC).................................93 6.2.4 Additional analysis of the 122 kHz even-parity FRC................................101 6.3 Combination probe data for the 107 kHz odd-parity FRC...................................110 6.3.1 FRC midplane results.................................................................................110 6.3.2 Results from the south exhaust jet (odd-parity FRC) ................................115 Chapter VII: Summary and conclusions.........................................................................120 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................123 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my wife Jane Kuramoto Melnik and my mother Louise Melnik for their continued support during my studies. This dissertation would not have been possible without the guidance and patience of my graduate advisor Prof. Alan Hoffman, and Prof. Richard Milroy whose insight has been invaluable. My sincerest thanks goes out to the entire RPPL staff whose knowledge and expertise made the TCSU experiment a success and this dissertation a reality. To George Vlases for helping understand the most complex problems and to Bob Brooks who can solve any challenge no matter how daunting. Houyang Guo and James Grossnickle for helping me operate the machine. To Kennith Miller for helping simplify difficult engineering designs. Terry Dehart and Dan Lotz without whom the combination probe would not have been possible. Jon Hayward, Scott Kimball, Matthew Fishburn, and Mike Dellinger are all experts at what they do and kept the TCSU experiment running. I would also like to thank Dennis Peterson and Dzung Tran at the Guggenheim machine shop who can make complicated designs a reality and are quick to spot potential improvements. And a special thanks goes out to George Votroubek, Chris Deards, Kiyong Lee, Aydin Tankut, and Katherine Velas who have made RPPL the great place that it was. 1 Chapter I: Introduction to Plasma Confinement and the TCSU Experiment 1.1 Introduction Thermonuclear fusion will potentially be the Earth’s energy source of the future. Fusion of the hydrogen isotopes, deuterium and tritium, has the lowest ignition temperature which means it requires the lowest amount of input energy for a reaction to occur. Hydrogen in the most abundant element in the universe and it is very plentiful on Earth so the typical fusion reactants will always be available and in almost limitless quantities. For a D-T fusion reaction to occur a deuterium ion must collide with a tritium ion with enough energy to overcome their electrostatic repulsion. The P-P solar fusion chain is the process that powers all of the stars in the universe, including the Sun. The appreciable reaction cross-section in the Sun’s core allows for nuclear fusion to occur because an extremely high density of high temperature ions is confined for a long time by gravity. In a terrestrial based fusion experiment we do not have the luxury of gravity to confine the high temperature reactants so magnetic fields are used for steady state confinement. The most common magnetic confinement fusion concept is the tokamak [1], in which the high temperature, ionized gas called plasma is confined in a torus shape around a central conductor. The plasma in a tokamak is stabilized by a large toroidal magnetic field generated by magnet coils that surround the torus shaped vacuum chamber. The central conductor is a solenoid that is essentially the backbone of the magnetic configuration. The change of magnetic flux in the center solenoid induces a toroidal electric field via Faraday’s law which drives the plasma current. The plasma current is responsible for the generation of a poloidal magnetic field that confines the plasma and is necessary for an equilibrium in which the plasma pressure is balanced by the magnetic 2 forces. The poloidal field is also used to counteract the particle drifts inherent in toroidal plasma geometry. The doubly connected geometry of a tokamak is difficult to design and build and may not be the ideal confinement geometry of fusion plasma. To this end, a range of Innovative Confinement Concepts (ICC) such as the field reversed configuration have been explored. 3 1.2 The Field Reversed Configuration 1.2.1 FRC Introduction The simply connected plasma confinement concept known as the field reversed configuration (FRC) consists of an elongated azimuthal current ring confined by an axial magnetic field [2,3]. The cylindrical geometry of the FRC (r,θ,z coordinates) is a major advantage over other magnetic confinement concepts in that there is no vacuum boundary or magnetic field coil linking the hole of the plasma torus. This offers a beneficial reduction in the engineering complexity and constructions costs of the vacuum chamber and magnetic coils. The FRC also has a natural divertor so any particles lost are incorporated into the exhaust jets streaming away from the FRC at both ends. The effect of the natural divertor is advantageous is many ways; simply because the divertor plates can be located far from the FRC or, in a more ambitious,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fusion Space Propulsion-A Shorter Time Frame Than You Think
    FusionFusion SpaceSpace Propulsion--Propulsion-- AA ShorterShorter TimeTime FrameFrame thanthan YouYou ThinkThink JohnJohn F.F. SantariusSantarius FusionFusion TechnologyTechnology InstituteInstitute UniversityUniversity ofof WisconsinWisconsin JANNAFJANNAF Monterey,Monterey, 5-85-8 DecemberDecember 20052005 D-3He and Pulsed-Power Fusion Approaches Would Shorten Development Times $$$ Fusion D-3HeD-3He FRC,FRC, dipole,dipole, Rocket spheromak,spheromak, ST;ST; Pulsed-powerPulsed-power MTF,MTF, PHD,PHD, fast-ignitorfast-ignitor JFS 2005 Fusion Technology Institute 2 D-3He Fusion Will Provide Capabilities Not Available from Other Propulsion Options 107 Fusion ) s 6 / 10 10 kW/kg m ( y 1 kW/kg t i c o l 5 0.1 kW/kg e 10 v t Nuclear us (fission) Ga s-core fission ha electric x 4 E 10 Nuclear thermal Chemical 103 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1 10 Thrust-to-weight ratio JFS 2005 Fusion Technology Institute 3 Predicted Specific Power of D-3He Magnetic Fusion Rockets Is Attractive (>1 kW/kg) • Predictions based on reasonably detailed magnetic fusion rocket studies. Specific Power First Author Year Configuration (kW/kg) Borowski 1987 Spheromak 10.5 Borowski 1987 Spherical torus 5.8 Santarius 1988 Tandem mirror 1.2 Bussard 1990 Riggatron 3.9 Teller 1991 Dipole 1.0 Nakashima 1994 Field-reversed configuration 1.0 Emrich 2000 Gasdynamic mirror 130 Thio 2002 Magnetized-target fusion 50 Williams 2003 Spherical torus 8.7 Cheung 2004 Colliding-beam FRC 1.5 JFS 2005 Fusion Technology Institute 4 Fusion Propulsion Would Enable Fast and Efficient Solar-System Travel • Fusion propulsion would dramatically reduce trip times (shown below) or increase payload fractions.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT FUSION DRIVE for Interstellar Exploration S.A
    Journal of the British Interplanetary Society VOLUME 72 NO.2 FEBRUARY 2019 General interstellar issue DIRECT FUSION DRIVE for Interstellar Exploration S.A. Cohen et al. INTERMEDIATE BEAMERS FOR STARSHOT: Probes to the Sun’s Inner Gravity Focus James Benford & Gregory Matloff REALITY, THE BREAKTHROUGH INITIATIVES and Prospects for Colonization of Space Edd Wheeler A GRAVITATIONAL WAVE TRANSMITTER A.A. Jackson and Gregory Benford CORRESPONDENCE www.bis-space.com ISSN 0007-084X PUBLICATION DATE: 29 APRIL 2019 Submitting papers International Advisory Board to JBIS JBIS welcomes the submission of technical Rachel Armstrong, Newcastle University, UK papers for publication dealing with technical Peter Bainum, Howard University, USA reviews, research, technology and engineering in astronautics and related fields. Stephen Baxter, Science & Science Fiction Writer, UK James Benford, Microwave Sciences, California, USA Text should be: James Biggs, The University of Strathclyde, UK ■ As concise as the content allows – typically 5,000 to 6,000 words. Shorter papers (Technical Notes) Anu Bowman, Foundation for Enterprise Development, California, USA will also be considered; longer papers will only Gerald Cleaver, Baylor University, USA be considered in exceptional circumstances – for Charles Cockell, University of Edinburgh, UK example, in the case of a major subject review. Ian A. Crawford, Birkbeck College London, UK ■ Source references should be inserted in the text in square brackets – [1] – and then listed at the Adam Crowl, Icarus Interstellar, Australia end of the paper. Eric W. Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, USA ■ Illustration references should be cited in Kathryn Denning, York University, Toronto, Canada numerical order in the text; those not cited in the Martyn Fogg, Probability Research Group, UK text risk omission.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion Propulsion
    Fusion Propulsion Opening the Solar System Frontier John F Santarius Lecture 28 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University of Wisconsin March 31, 2004 Key Points • D-3He appears to be the fusion fuel of choice for space applications. • D-3He fusion will provide capabilities not available from other propulsion options. • Several configurations appear promising for space propulsion, particularly the field-reversed configuration (FRC), magnetized-target fusion (MTF), spheromak, and spherical torus. • Successful development of D-3He fusion would provide attractive propulsion, power, and materials processing capabilities. JFS 2004 Fusion Technology Institute 2 A Prophecy Whose Time Will Come “The short-lived Uranium Age will see the dawn of space flight; the succeeding era of fusion power will witness its fulfillment.” From the essay “The Planets Are Not Enough” (1961). JFS 2004 Fusion Technology Institute 3 D-3He Fusion Will Provide Capabilities Not Available from Other Propulsion Options 107 Fusion ) s 6 / 10 10 kW/kg m ( y 1 kW/kg t i c o l 5 0.1 kW/kg e 10 v t Nuclear us (fission) Ga s-core fission ha electric x 4 E 10 Nuclear thermal Chemical 103 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1 10 Thrust-to-weight ratio JFS 2004 Fusion Technology Institute 4 At the Predicted Specific Power, α=1-10 kW/kg, Fusion Propulsion Would Enable Attractive Solar-System Travel • Comparison of trip times and payload fractions for chemical and fusion rockets: Fast human transport Efficient cargo transport 1000 1 900 0.9 ) s 800 0.8 on
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School TRANSHUMANISM: EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC, RHETORIC, AND THE FUTURE A Dissertation in English by Andrew Pilsch c 2011 Andrew Pilsch Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2011 The dissertation of Andrew Pilsch was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Richard Doyle Professor of English Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee Jeffrey Nealon Liberal Arts Research Professor of English Mark Morrisson Professor of English and Science, Technology, and Society Robert Yarber Distinguished Professor of Art Mark Morrisson Graduate Program Director Professor of English ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. Abstract This project traces the discursive formation called “transhumanism” through vari- ous incarnations in twentieth century science, philosophy, and science fiction. While subject to no single, clear definition, I follow most of the major thinkers in the topic by defining transhumanism as a discourse surrounding the view of human beings as subject to ongoing evolutionary processes. Humanism, from Descartes forward, has histori- cally viewed the human as stable; transhumanism, instead, views humans as constantly evolving and changing, whether through technological or cultural means. The degree of change, the direction of said change, and the shape the species will take in the distant future, however, are all topics upon which there is little consensus in transhuman circles. In tracing this discourse, I accomplish a number of things. First, previously dis- parate zones of academic inquiry–poststructural philosophy, science studies, literary modernism and postmodernism, etc.–are shown to be united by a common vocabulary when viewed from the perspective of the “evolutionary futurism” suggested by tran- shuman thinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Beam Propulsion, an Overview
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303682465 Mass beam propulsion, an overview Article · January 2015 CITATIONS READS 0 260 2 authors, including: Adam Crowl Icarus Interstellar 22 PUBLICATIONS 22 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Galactic Surveys View project BFR to Titan View project All content following this page was uploaded by Adam Crowl on 21 August 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Mass BeamJBIS, Propulsion, Vol. 68, Anpp.?-?, Overview 2015 MASS BEAM PROPULSION, AN OVERVIEW GERALD D. NORDLEY1 AND ADAM JAMES CROWL2 1. 1238 Prescott Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA. 2. 4 Ulmarra Crescent, Strathpine 4500, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] An alternative to rockets is to push spacecraft with a reflected beam. The advantage is that it leaves most of the propulsion system mass at rest. Use of mass beams, as opposed to photons, allows great efficiency by adjusting the beam velocity so the reflected mass is left near zero velocity relative to the source. There is no intrinsic limit to the proper frame map velocity that can be achieved. To make a propulsion system, subsystems need to be developed to acquire propulsive energy, accelerate the mass into a collimated beam, insure that the mass reaches the spacecraft and reflect the mass. A number of approaches to these requirements have been proposed and are summarized here. Generally no new scientific discoveries or breakthroughs are needed. These concepts are supported by ongoing progress in robotics, in nanometre scale technologies and in those technologies needed to use of space resources for the automated manufacture of space-based solar power facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2103.10794V1 [Physics.Plasm-Ph] 19 Mar 2021 ΨN, N ≥ 124–26 Or Even an Exponential Relationship, P ∝ Synchronously
    The effect of rigid electron rotation on the Grad-Shafranov equilibria of a class of FRC devices C.P.S. Swanson1 and S.A. Cohen2 1)Princeton Fusion Systems, Plainsboro, NJ, USA 2)Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA (Dated: March 22, 2021) Rigid electron rotation of a fully penetrated Rotamak-FRC produces a pressure flux function that is more peaked than the Solov’ev flux function. This paper explores the implications of this peaked pressure flux function, including the isothermal case, which appear when the temperature profile is broader than the density profile, creating both benefits and challenges to a Rotamak-FRC based fusion reactor. In this regime, the density distribution becomes very peaked, enhancing the fusion power. The separatrix has a tendency to become oblate, which can be mitigated by flux conserving current loops. Plasma extends outside the separatrix, notably in the open field line region. This model does not apply to very kinetic FRCs or FRCs in which there are significant ion flows, but it may have some applicability to their outer layers. I. INTRODUCTION The Grad-Shafranov equation has also been used to model FRC equilibria with pressure flux functions that do not include 32,33 Rotamak-FRCs are plasma physics experiments in which rigid rotor effects. electron current is driven by an externally-imposed rotat- In Section II, we will derive the flux functions to be in- ing magnetic field (RMF).1 Interest in this configuration of serted into the Grad-Shafranov solver that are required by the plasma arises from its favorable properties for scaling into a condition of rigid electron rotation.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Fusion Drive for a Human Mars Orbital Mission
    IAC-14,C4,6.2 Direct Fusion Drive for a Human Mars Orbital Mission Michael Paluszek Princeton Satellite Systems, USA, [email protected] Gary Pajer,∗ Yosef Razin, y James Slonaker,z Samuel Cohen,x Russ Feder ,{ Kevin Griffin,k Matthew Walsh∗∗ The Direct Fusion Drive (DFD) is a nuclear fusion engine that produces both thrust and electric power. It employs a field reversed configuration with an odd-parity rotating magnetic field heating system to heat the plasma to fusion temperatures. The engine uses deuterium and helium-3 as fuel and additional deuterium that is heated in the scrape-off layer for thrust augmentation. In this way variable exhaust velocity and thrust is obtained. This paper presents the design of an engine for a human mission to orbit Mars. The mission uses NASA’s Deep Space Habitat to house the crew. The spacecraft starts in Earth orbit and reaches escape velocity using the DFD. Transfer to Mars is done with two burns and a coasting period in between. The process is repeated on the return flight. Aerodynamic braking is not required at Mars or on the return to the Earth. The vehicle could be used for multiple missions and could support human landings on Mars. The total mission duration is 310 days with 30 days in Mars orbit. The Mars orbital mission will require one NASA Evolved Configuration Space Launch System launch with an additional launch to bring the crew up to the Mars vehicle in an Orion spacecraft. The paper includes a detailed design of the Direct Fusion Drive engine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of the RMF Effect on the Performance of Field Reversed Configuration Thruster
    The Study of the RMF effect on the Performance of Field Reversed Configuration Thruster IEPC-2017-101 Presented at the 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference Georgia Institute of Technology • Atlanta, Georgia • USA October 8 – 12, 2017 X. F. Sun1, Y. H. Jia, T. P. Zhang, J. J. Chen Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory, Lanzhou Institute of Physics, Lanzhou 730000，China Abstract: A Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) plasmoid will be formatted by applying a Rotation Magnetic Field (RMF). The azimuthal currents that driven with RMF will couple with the radial magnetic field produced from axial magnetic field gradient and then a Lorentz force(J훉×Br) created and accelerates the plasmoid to a high velocity. This potential advantage services to space thruster can produce highly variable thrust and specific impulse at high efficiency. While the critical acceleration mechanism of this method is that the plasmoid electron current can be effectively driven. This study concerns to the effect of antisymmetric and symmetric RMF antenna on the ionization of the propellant. The RMF magnetic topology and the driven electron current from two different RMF antennas are compared, and which will be useful for the optimized designing of FRC thruster. Nomenclature Bω = Rotation Magnetic Field IRMF =The driven current of RMF Jθ =The driven current density of RMF Φ =The magnetic flux F =Lorenz Force 휔 =Frequency of RMF Br =Radial direction magnetic field r =Plasma radius ne =Plasma electron density I. Introduction HE first
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of Space Technological Breakthroughs
    Project Number: JMW‐IRAC Forecast of Space Technological Breakthroughs An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by _________________ Tim Climis _____________________________ Amanda Learned _____________________________ Damon Bussey Date: 3 March 2005 _______________________________ Professor John M. Wilkes, Advisor ii Abstract Significant and plausible technological breakthroughs for the future of space travel are formulated based on cutting‐edge technologies and ideas, then sent for assessment by two Delphi‐type panels: one of “expertsʺ including NASA employees, academics, and enthusiasts, and one of cognitively‐known WPI Alumni. The results show the most likely and significant potential breakthroughs within the next 25‐50 years. These breakthroughs will be used to form portrayals of alternative futures in space to be assessed by the panelists in later rounds of the study. iii Acknowledgments The project group would like to thank the following for their support during the progress of this project. Milat Sayra Berirmen, Sebastian Ziolek, Kemal Cakkol, and Chris Elko, members of the previous IQP group that did a historical projection forecast. Professor Sergey Makarov for coming up with the idea for this project and acting as a co‐ advisor. Freeman Dyson for his encouragement and interest in the project. Rick Kline for getting the ball rolling at Cornell and helping us get contacts at NASA. All of the expert and alumni panelists that took the time to fill out the questionnaire and provide us with their opinions and insights. Ryan Wallace and Joseph Holmes of the Science Fiction Technology group that provided information on some breakthroughs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Workshop Proceedings Here
    Proceedings of the Foundations for Interstellar Studies Workshop New York City, 13 – 15 June 2017 Edited by Kelvin F. Long Organised by the Institute for Interstellar Studies (USA) and City Tech City University New York Copyright Statement © 2017 The papers shown in this document remain the copyright property of the individual authors and nobody may use them in other published material without those authors permission. 2 Preface This document contains the written proceedings for the Foundations of Interstellar Studies workshop that took place in New York 13-15 June 2015. This was a scientific technical meeting organised between the Institute for Interstellar Studies (a US based not-for-profit) and City University New York. The event was also sponsored by Stellar Engines Ltd and the Breakthrough Initiatives. Post-workshop, a total of eighteen papers were written up and submitted to the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. This includes in volume 71 of the journal, published during 2018 as special interstellar studies red covers which included: First Step on the Interstellar Journey: The Solar Gravity Lens Focus, L. Friedman et al. Experimental Simulation of Dust Impacts at Starflight Velocities, A. J. Higgins. Plasma Dynamics in Firefly’s Z-Pinch Fusion Engine, R. M. Freeland. Gram-Scale Nano-Spacecraft Entry into Star Systems, A. A. Jackson. The Interstellar Fusion Fuel Resource Base of Our Solar System, R. G. Kennedy. Tests of Fundamental Physics in Interstellar Flight, R. Kezerashvili. Effects of Enhanced Graphene Reflection on the Performance of Sun-Launched Interstellar Arks, G. L. Matloff. Heat Transfer in Fusion Starship, Radiation Shielding Systems, Michel Lamontagne.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: the Technoqueer Manifesto
    © Copyright 2012 Edmond Y. Chang Technoqueer: Re/Con/Figuring Posthuman Narratives Edmond Y. Chang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2012 Reading Committee: Thomas Foster, Chair Kate Cummings Eva Cherniavsky Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of English ii In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346, 1-800-521- 0600, to whom the author has granted “the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform.” Signature _____________________________ Date _________________________________ iii University of Washington ABSTRACT Technoqueer: Re/Con/Figuring Posthuman Narratives Edmond Y. Chang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Thomas Foster Department of English This dissertation addresses the intersections of queer and technology to rethink the posthuman as raced, gendered, and queered as co-constituted through and by technology. Given technoculture’s appropriation of queerness as yet another identity category subject to individualist manipulation and the near invisibility or silence of technology in queer theory, this dissertation theorizes the “technoqueer,” building on the pioneering work of Donna Haraway’s cyborg, Roseanne Allucquere Stone definition of the technosocial subject, Nina Wakeford’s cyberqueer, Lisa Nakamura’s cybertype, and N.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Fusion Drive for a Human Mars Orbital Mission
    IAC-14,C4,6.2 Direct Fusion Drive for a Human Mars Orbital Mission Michael Paluszek Princeton Satellite Systems, USA, [email protected] Gary Pajer,∗ Samuel Cohen,y K. Griffin,z M. Walshx A. H. Glasser,{ The Direct Fusion Drive (DFD) is a 1-10 MW nuclear fusion engine that produces both thrust and electric power. It employs a field reversed configuration with an odd-parity rotating magnetic field heating system to heat the plasma to fusion temperatures. The engine uses deuterium and helium-3 as fuel and additional deuterium that is heated in the scrape-off layer for thrust augmentation. In this way variable exhaust velocity and thrust is obtained. This paper presents the design of an engine for a human mission to orbit Mars. The mission uses NASA’s Deep Space Habitat to house the crew. The spacecraft starts in Earth orbit and reaches escape velocity using the DFD. Transfer to Mars is done with two burns and a coasting period in between. The process is repeated on the return flight. Aerodynamic braking is not required at Mars or on the return to the Earth. The vehicle could be used for multiple missions and could support human landings on Mars. The total mission duration is 310 days with 30 days in Mars orbit. The Mars orbital mission will require one NASA Evolved Configuration Space Launch System launch with an additional launch to bring the crew up to the Mars vehicle in an Orion spacecraft. The paper includes a detailed design of the Direct Fusion Drive engine. The engine startup/restart sys- tem and shielding are discussed.
    [Show full text]