Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – Kilcock Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – Kilcock Model Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – Kilcock Model DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0600Rp0027_HA09 Hydraulics Report Model Name Kilcock Rev Status Author(s) Modeller Reviewed by Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date . D01 Draft K. Smart D. Irwin S. Patterson M. Brian Belfast 08/01/2014 D02 Draft T. Carberry D. Irwin S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 27/06/2014 F01 Draft D. Irwin D. Irwin S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 13/02/2015 Final F02 Draft D. Irwin D. Irwin S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 13/08/2015 Final F03 Draft D. Irwin D. Irwin S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 05/08/2016 Final IBE0600Rp0027 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Table of Reference Reports Report Issue Date Report Reference Relevant Section Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk December IBE0600Rp0001_Flood Risk 3.5.9 Review 2011 Review_F02 Eastern CFRAM Study Inception August 2012 IBE0600Rp0008_HA09 Inception 4.3.2 Report UoM09 Report_F02 Eastern CFRAM Study Hydrology September IBE0600Rp0016_HA09_Hydrology 4.10 Report UoM09 2013 Report_F01 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Liffey November 2001s4884- SC2 Survey Report v1 1.2 Survey Contract Report 2012 Eastern CFRAM Study Overarching May 2013 IBE0600Rp0014_F02 4.2 Report on the October 2011 Flood IBE0600Rp0027 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL 4 HYDRAULIC MODEL DETAILS 4.15 KILCOCK MODEL 4.15.1 General Hydraulic Model Information (1) Introduction: The Eastern CFRAM Flood Risk Review (IBE0600Rp0016_Flood Risk Review) highlighted Kilcock as an AFA for fluvial flooding based on a review of historic flooding and the extents of flood risk determined during the PFRA. The Kilcock model encompasses the upper reaches of the Rye Water including the tributaries which affect the Kilcock AFA including the smaller tributary watercourses the Culcor, Balfeaghan and Dolanstown. The total contributing catchment area is approximately 60 km2. The model is gauged at the downstream boundary at Annes Bridge (09048 – EPA). The Kilcock model discharges flows at its downstream end to the Maynooth model. A catchment run-off (NAM) model has been developed of the gauged catchment and calibrated against the low to mid range continuous flow trace at the Annes Bridge gauging station using gauge adjusted radar based hourly rainfall sums for the catchment from 2001 to 2010. Using the adjusted radar based rainfall sums and observed rainfall sums from surrounding rain gauges a continuous flow trace was simulated for the period 1950 to 2010. An AMAX series was extracted from the continuous flow trace and 3 the simulated Qmed observed to be 17.0 m /s. Although the simulated Qmed value may be affected by any uncertainty in the observed flow record at the gauging station (through calibration of the NAM model) they are considered improved estimates of Qmed at the gauging stations due to the longer record length, the quality of the rainfall and catchment data and the availability of the flow records for calibration. All of the watercourses within this model have been designated as HPWs, and have been modelled as 1D- 2D using the MIKE suite of software. Channel markers have been located at the right and left banks of all cross sections. Flow within these markers is calculated by the 1D model component; however when the water level rises sufficiently to meet the bank markers flow can enter the 2D domain which represents the floodplain. (2) Model Reference: HA09_KILC5 (3) AFAs included in the model: Kilcock (4) Primary Watercourses / Water Bodies (including local names): Reach ID Name 09RYEW RYE WATER 09CULC CULCOR 09BALF BALFEAGHAN IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-1 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL 09DOLA DOLANSTOWN (5) Software Type (and version): (a) 1D Domain: (b) 2D Domain: (c) Other model elements: MIKE 11 (2011) MIKE 21 - Rectangular Mesh MIKE FLOOD (2011) (2011) 4.15.2 Hydraulic Model Schematisation (1) Map of Model Extents: IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-2 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.1: Kilcock Model Overview IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-3 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.2: Kilcock AFA Extent Figure 4.15.1 and Figure 4.15.2 illustrate the extent of the modelled catchment, river centre line, HEP locations and AFA extents as applicable. The catchment contains 4 Upstream Limit HEPs, 3 Trib HEPs and 1 Gauging Station HEP which acts as the downstream limit of the model. The catchment does not contain any Intermediate HEPs. IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-4 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL (2) x-y Coordinates of River (Upstream extent): Table 4.15.1: x-y Coordinates of River River Name x y 09RYEW RYE WATER 285313.5 242027 09CULC CULCOR 285998.5 243940.5 09BALF BALFEAGHAN 288320 242472 09DOLA DOLANSTOWN 289762 241222 (3) Total Modelled Watercourse Length: 17.7 km (approx.) (4) 1D Domain only Watercourse Length: 0 km (5) 1D-2D Domain 17.7 km Watercourse Length: (approx.) (6) 2D Domain Mesh Type / Resolution / Area: Rectangular / 5 metres / 54 km2 (7) 2D Domain Model Extent: IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-5 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.3: Model 2D Domain IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-6 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.3 illustrates the modelled extents and the general topography of the catchment. The spatial extent of the AFA boundary is outlined in black. The reach centre-lines are presented in light-blue which also represents the 1D modelled extent that is within the 2D area. Buildings are excluded from the mesh and therefore represented as red. Refer to Chapter 3 for details on representation of buildings in the model. Figure 4.15.4 shows an overview drawing of the model schematisation. Figure 4.15.5 to Figure 4.15.9 show detailed views. The overview diagram covers the model extents, showing the surveyed cross-section locations, AFA boundary and river centre line. It also shows the area covered by the 2D model domain. The detailed areas are provided where there is the most significant risk of flooding. These diagrams include the surveyed cross-section locations, AFA boundary and river centre. They also show the location of the critical structures as discussed in Section 4.15.3(1), along with the location and extent of the links between the 1D and 2D models. For clarity in viewing cross-section locations, the detail diagrams show the full extent of the surveyed cross-sections. Note that the 1D model considers only the cross-section between the 1D-2D links. Figure 4.15.4: Model Schematisation Overview IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-7 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.5: Detailed Area of Model Schematisation showing Critical Structures Figure 4.15.6: Detailed Area of Model Schematisation showing Critical Structures IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-8 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.7: Detailed Area of Model Schematisation showing Critical Structures Figure 4.15.8: Detailed Area of Model Schematisation showing Critical Structures IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-9 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Figure 4.15.9: Detailed Area of Model Schematisation showing Critical Structures (8) Survey Information (a) Survey Folder Structure: First Level Folder Second Level Folder Third Level Folder Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120607_09BALF GIS and Gloodplain Structure Register Photos Where: Kilcock Surveyed Cross Section Lines Murphy - Surveyor Name Ascii E09 - Eastern CFRAM Study Area, Drawings and PDFs Hydrometric Area 09 M05 - Model Number 05 Photos (Naming convention is in the WP3 - Work Package 3 format of Cross-Section 120607 - Date issued (30 August 2012) ID and orientation - 09BALF - River Reference upstream, downstream, left bank or right bank) (b) Survey Folder References: Reach ID Name File Ref. 09RYEW RYE WATER Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120619_09RYEW_A Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120607_09RYEW_B IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-10 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120607_09RYEW_C Murphy_E09_M04_WP3_130315_09RYEW_D Murphy_E09_M04_WP3_120619_09RYEW_E 09CULC CULCOR Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120619_09CULC 09BALF BALFEAGHAN Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120607_09BALF 09DOLA DOLANSTOWN Murphy_E09_M05_WP3_120629_09DOLA (9) Survey Issues: Initial attempts to calibrate the model to Anne's Bridge gauging station (09048) suggested an error in the survey of the weir crest at this gauge. The original survey data received for section 09RYEW00978W showed that the lowest point of the weir was at the right bank and had a crest level of 50.470mOD Malin. Photos of the structure at low flow, as shown in Figure 4.15.10, suggested it was a V-shaped structure and the records of EPA who operate the station state that the lowest point of the crest is 50.259mOD Malin. A request was therefore made to have this section re-surveyed, and revised data was delivered on 15/03/2013 which stated that the invert level of the weir crest was 50.206mOD Malin. This revised data was included in the final hydraulic model. Figure 4.15.10: Anne's Bridge gauging station at low flow The 2D domain was derived using 5m resolution LiDAR data as described in section 2.2.2, and no localised post-processing of this data was carried out. IBE0600Rp0027 4.15-11 F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report - DRAFT FINAL 4.15.3 Hydraulic Model Construction (1) 1D Structures (in-channel along See Appendix A.1 modelled watercourses): Number of Bridges and Culverts: 28 Number of Weirs: 5 The survey information recorded includes a photograph of each structure, which has been used to determine the Manning's n value. Further details are included in Chapter 3.5.1. A discussion on the way structures have been modelled is included in Chapter 3.3.4. On the Rye Water, bridges 09RYEW01608D (Balfeaghan Bridge), 09RYEW01469D (Meath Bridge) and 09RYEW00990D (Moyglare Road Bridge) restrict flow on the Rye Water and cause widespread flooding from both banks during design runs of 10% AEP or greater.
Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the Celbridge-Leixlip Municipal District Meeting Held at 10:00Am on Friday 18 November 2016 in the Council Chamber, Áras Chill Dara, Naas
    Kildare County Council Minutes of the Celbridge-Leixlip Municipal District Meeting held at 10:00am on Friday 18 November 2016 in the Council Chamber, Áras Chill Dara, Naas Members Present : Councillor B. Caldwell (Cathaoirleach) Councillors K. Byrne, M. Coleman, I. Cussen, A. Larkin, J. Neville, B. Young. Present: Mr P. Minnock (District Manager), Ms E. Wright (Senior Executive Officer), Ms K. Kenny (Senior Executive Planner), Mr C. Buggie (Municipal District Engineer), Ms V. Cooke (Administrative Officer), Ms A. Corbett (Senior Community Worker), Ms M. Dalton (Meetings Administrator), Ms A. M. Campbell (Secretary). CL01/1611 Draft Celbridge Local Area Plan A copy of the Draft Leixlip Local Area Plan 2017 – 2023 was circulated to the members and it was agreed by the members to hold a special meeting to discuss the Draft Celbridge Local Area Plan 2017-2023 on 28 November 2016 at 11:00 a.m. It was agreed by the members to meet informally to discuss a broad outline of the breakdown of spend for the Local Property Tax funding and to submit this breakdown to Mr Minnock in advance of a meeting with him to discuss this funding. CL02/1611 Minutes and progress report The members considered the minutes of the budget and monthly meetings of the Celbridge- Leixlip Municipal District held on the 21 October 2016, together with the progress report. The minutes of the budget meeting were approved and the minutes of the monthly meeting were approved subject to an addition, with agreement of the members, to items CL21,22,24/1607 "Councillor Young made the point that during the meetings in 2010, organised along the lines specified by Kildare County Council and attended to monitor voting by an officer of Kildare County Council, no issue or objection to partitioning of the backlots Page 1 of 16 Kildare County Council on grounds of a supposed right of way was raised, either by residents or Kildare County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment of Lands in the Townlands of Commons West, Boycetown and Kilcock (Adjacent to the Existing Brayton Park Estate), Kilcock, County Kildare
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF LANDS IN THE TOWNLANDS OF COMMONS WEST, BOYCETOWN AND KILCOCK (ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BRAYTON PARK ESTATE), KILCOCK, COUNTY KILDARE ON BEHALF OF: RYCROFT HOMES LIMITED CASE REF.: ABP-302746-18 AUTHOR: ROSS WATERS DECEMBER 2019 IAC PROJECT REF.: J3417 Kilcock SHD, Archaeological Assessment Co. Kildare DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET DATE DOCUMENT TITLE REV. PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY Archaeological Assessment of 16.12.19 1 Ross Waters Grace Corbett Faith Bailey Kilcock SHD Co. Kildare i IRISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANCY LTD Kilcock SHD, Archaeological Assessment Co. Kildare ABSTRACT Irish Archaeological Consultancy Ltd has prepared this report on behalf of Rycroft Homes Limited, to study the impact, if any, on the archaeological and historical resource of the proposed strategic housing development at lands in the townlands of Commons West, Boycetown and Kilcock (adjacent to the existing Brayton Park estate), Kilcock, County Kildare (ITM 687736/739821). The report was undertaken by Ross Waters of IAC Ltd. There are no recorded monuments within the proposed development, the closest is a bawn (KD005-019) situated c. 440m to the southwest. The Pale ditch is thought to have traversed the landscape to the south, west and northwest of the town of Kilcock. Although its route is unconfirmed, there is potential that it may have crossed the north east side of the site. The only archaeological discovery from previous investigations in the surrounding area was of two pits, one of which contained burnt bone, c. 285m to the north. The proposed development lay across a series of open fields throughout the post-medieval period, situated in a rural landscape on the periphery of Kilcock.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Biodiversity at Intel Ireland
    Intel Ireland has a long history of the Orchard on site, planting a butterfly CONTENTS supporting biodiversity at our campus bed in the community and supporting our in Leixlip. 2016 has been for us a year Tidy Towns and schools with additional 1. INTRODUCTION ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 of renewed focus on biodiversity environmental projects. I would also like both here on our site and in the local to acknowledge the importance of the 2. CONTEXT FOR ACTION �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 community. We are honoured to be the strong relationships we have built with our 2.1. SCIENCE ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 first company in Ireland to use Business surrounding communities and to thank in the Community Ireland’s innovative them for their ongoing support. 2.2. GOVERNANCE & POLICY �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7 Biodiversity Framework to shape our approach to biodiversity management. Intel has a long history of commitment 3. INTEL IRELand’s BIODIVERSITY SUPPORTS ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10
    [Show full text]
  • Kildare-Meath Grid Upgrade Step 3 Strategic SIA Scoping Report
    Kildare-Meath Grid Upgrade Step 3 Strategic SIA Scoping Report February 2021 EirGrid Strategic SIA Scoping R eport Strategic Social Impact Assessment Scoping Report Kildare Meath Grid Upgrade Step 3 Project No: 32108AE Document Title: Strategic SIA Scoping Report Document No.: 32108AE-REP-003 Document Status: Final Date: February 2021 Client Name: EirGrid Client No: Project Manager: Fay Lagan Author: Lyndsey McGonigle File Name: Jacobs Engineering Ireland Limited Merrion House Merrion Road Dublin 4, D04 R2C5 Ireland T +353 1 269 5666 F +353 1 269 5497 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2021 Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. 32108AE-REP-003 Strategic Social Impact Assessment Scoping Report Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... i Update to Social Impact Assessment ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of Ireland
    Sl. No River Name Length Comments 1 Abbert River 25.25 miles (40.64 km) 2 Aghinrawn Fermanagh 3 Agivey 20.5 miles (33.0 km) Londonderry 4 Aherlow River 27 miles (43 km) Tipperary 5 River Aille 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 6 Allaghaun River 13.75 miles (22.13 km) Limerick 7 River Allow 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Cork 8 Allow, 22.75 miles (36.61 km) County Cork (Blackwater) 9 Altalacky (Londonderry) 10 Annacloy (Down) 11 Annascaul (Kerry) 12 River Annalee 41.75 miles (67.19 km) 13 River Anner 23.5 miles (37.8 km) Tipperary 14 River Ara 18.25 miles (29.37 km) Tipperary 15 Argideen River 17.75 miles (28.57 km) Cork 16 Arigna River 14 miles (23 km) 17 Arney (Fermanagh) 18 Athboy River 22.5 miles (36.2 km) Meath 19 Aughavaud River, County Carlow 20 Aughrim River 5.75 miles (9.25 km) Wicklow 21 River Avoca (Ovoca) 9.5 miles (15.3 km) Wicklow 22 River Avonbeg 16.5 miles (26.6 km) Wicklow 23 River Avonmore 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Wicklow 24 Awbeg (Munster Blackwater) 31.75 miles (51.10 km) 25 Baelanabrack River 11 miles (18 km) 26 Baleally Stream, County Dublin 27 River Ballinamallard 16 miles (26 km) 28 Ballinascorney Stream, County Dublin 29 Ballinderry River 29 miles (47 km) 30 Ballinglen River, County Mayo 31 Ballintotty River, County Tipperary 32 Ballintra River 14 miles (23 km) 33 Ballisodare River 5.5 miles (8.9 km) 34 Ballyboughal River, County Dublin 35 Ballycassidy 36 Ballyfinboy River 20.75 miles (33.39 km) 37 Ballymaice Stream, County Dublin 38 Ballymeeny River, County Sligo 39 Ballynahatty 40 Ballynahinch River 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 41 Ballyogan Stream, County Dublin 42 Balsaggart Stream, County Dublin 43 Bandon 45 miles (72 km) 44 River Bann (Wexford) 26 miles (42 km) Longest river in Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Maynooth Environs Written Statement
    Volume 5 Maynooth Environs Written Statement Maynooth Environs Written Statement Settlement Maynooth Environs Position in Settlement Hierarchy Large Growth Town II – strong, active, economically vibrant growth towns, with high quality transport links to larger towns/city. Position in Retail Strategy Level 3 Sub County Centre Population (2011) Census Not available Committed Housing Units (Not built) 0 committed units Household Allocation (Core Strategy) 199 No. Units Education None Community Facilities None Natura 2000 sites Rye Water Valley/Carton Special Area of Conservation Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Strategic Flood Risk Assessment carried out as part of the County Development Plan 2013 – 2019 states that the Flood Zones will not hinder future development and zoning for new development in areas of high flood risk can be avoided. Flood risk can be managed by adopting the policies set out in the County Development Plan and the recommendations of the Planning Guidelines. Goal To facilitate the development of Maynooth Environs as an integral component of Maynooth town, providing employment opportunities, residential and supporting community facilities in a design led, quality environment. 01 Town Context This Development Framework relates to lands on the northern environs of Maynooth town, within the administrative area of Meath County Council. The area comprises some 139 hectares of land located approximately 1.5km to the north east of the town centre. It is bisected by the R157 road which links Maynooth to Dunboyne. The area is bounded generally by agricultural lands and a small number of residences to the north, agricultural land within the Maynooth Local Area Plan 2013 to the south, Carton House Demesne (a Protected Structure) to the east and Pound Hill and agricultural land to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • 246/R246143.Pdf, .PDF Format 152KB
    An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report PL17.246143 DEVELOPMENT:- Residential development for 200 units and a crèche and associated works, (later revised to 223 units by way of further information) at Newtownmoyaghy, Kilcock, County Meath. PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Authority: Meath County Council Planning Authority Reg. No: RA150188 Applicant: Alcove Ireland Two Limited Application Type: Permission Planning Authority Decision: Refusal APPEAL Appellant: Alcove Ireland Two Limited Types of Appeal: 1st Party -v- Refusal Observer: Christina Farrell DATE OF SITE INSPECTION: 27th April, 2016. INSPECTOR: Paul Caprani PL17.246143 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 40 1.0 INTRODUCTION PL17.246143 relates to a first party appeal against the decision of Meath County Council to issue notification to refuse planning permission for the construction of a residential development comprising of 200 residential units (later revised to 223 units), a crèche facility and associated car parking in the townland of Newtownmoyaghy, Kilcock, County Meath. Meath County Council refused planning permission on the grounds that it contravened a number of objectives contained in the Meath County Development Plan in relation to household allocation and also failing to accommodate a school site as part of the overall layout. It was concluded therefore that the proposed development would materially contravene the Meath County Development Plan 2013-2019. The application was accompanied by an EIS and an NIS. The Board should note that there is a concurrent application and appeal located on the adjoining site to the east which also relates to residential development. Under this application Meath County Council granted planning permission for the construction of 150 dwellings and this decision was the subject of a third party appeal expressing concerns that the proposed development would give rise to flooding issues and that the flood risk assessment carried out in respect of the proposed development was flawed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ryewater Arterial Drainage Scheme
    Office of Public Works Arterial Drainage Maintenance Works - Ryewater Arterial Drainage Scheme Natura Impact Statement 2016 to 2020 Office of Public Works Main Street Headford Co Galway Ireland JBA Project Manager Tom Sampson 24 Grove Island Corbally Limerick Ireland Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Nathy Gilligan, OPW Draft Report / October 2015 Tony Brew, OPW Revised description of Nathy Gilligan, OPW Final Report / November 2015 proposed maintenance works Tony Brew, OPW Final report revised following Nathy Gilligan, OPW V6.0 /July 2016 Tufa Springs Surveys in 2016 Tony Brew, OPW Revisions following client Nathy Gilligan, OPW V7.0 / August 2016 review Tony Brew, OPW Change of report title and Nathy Gilligan, OPW V8.0 / August 2016 amendment to concluding text Tony Brew, OPW Contract This report describes work commissioned by the Office of Public Works, by a letter dated 05/06/2015. The Office of Public Works representative for the contract was Tony Brew. Laura Thomas, Tom Sampson and Anne Murray of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Anne Murray BSc MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Reviewed by ................................................. Declan Egan Environmental Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the OPW. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to the OPW. Copyright © JBA Consulting Engineers and Scientists Ltd 2016 Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 140g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 140g if primary-source paper is used.
    [Show full text]
  • 0050 Mike and Angela Parle
    Dear Minister, I refer to your recent launch of the above new plan, backed by cabinet. I am responding to your invitation to make a formal submission. If your plan fails to gain traction, this recent article summarises the resulting damage that will be done to Ireland and its citizens: http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/how-dublin-is-eating-ireland-35417250.html. The author opines "Obviously, the massive overcrowding in this baby belt was undermining the quality of lives for those on the East Coast, in particular, commuters. And with over 50% of the entire economic activity of the country, this swollen part of the country was draining potential commercial opportunities from the rest of the country." "If we do nothing and allow the market to determine the next 25 years, this part of Ireland will become unpleasant, angry and unstable. Now this is real dystopia." "In contrast, what was termed “Rural Ireland” will become “Empty Ireland”, pretty but desolate, a theme park for tourists trying to find the “Real Ireland”. It will be a bit like a giant famine village — an abandoned place, which used to be thriving but is now silent." It is forecasted that unless radical action is taken, some 75% of the projected population and new homes will be clustered around the capital city by 2040. Thus creating a potential community disaster for villages like Leixlip in North Kildare. Based on our own experience we in Leixlip would agree that "This will further exacerbate massive and increasingly unmanageable sprawl of housing areas, scattered employment and car-based commuting, presenting major challenges around lop-sided development, under-utilised potential, congestion and adverse impacts on people’s lives and the environment.” In addition, efficiciency and effectiveness of Irish development will regress and result in higher costs and poor value for taxpayer investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment Screening Report
    March 2010 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT 2010 Leixlip Local Area Plan 2010 Collinstown Local Area Plan Submitted to: Caroline Shinners Planning Section Kildare County Council Aras Chill Dara Naas T R O P E R Distribution: 1 copy - Kildare County Council 2 copies - Golder Associates LEIXLIP & COLLINSTOWN LAP 2010 - AA Record of Issue Company Client Contact Version Date Issued Method of Delivery Kildare County Caroline Shinners A.1 11/03/2010 Email Council Kildare County Caroline Shinners A.0 10/03/2010 Email Council Kildare County Caroline Shinners B.1 26/02/2010 Email Council March 2010 Report No. 08 5071 2 0196/A.1 LEIXLIP & COLLINSTOWN LAP 2010 - AA Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Terms of Reference ......................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Stage 1: Screening..................................................................................................................................2 1.2.2 Stage 2: Appropriate Assessment ...........................................................................................................2 1.2.3 Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions..........................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Natura Impact Report & Determination
    NATURA IMPACT REPORT DRAFT LEIXLIP LOCAL AREA PLAN 2017-2023 KILDARE COUNTY COUNCIL Project Reference: 160133 Rev. Status Author Reviewed By Approved By Issue Date D01 DRAFT CK PS PS 07/11/2016 D02 DRAFT CK PS PS 08/11/2016 D03 Final CK PS PS 04/04/2016 Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. www.scottcawley.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Legal Requirement for Habitats Directive Assessment .............................................................. 4 1.2 Statement of Authority ........................................................................................................... 5 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Formal Guidance ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sources of Information Used ................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Appropriate Assessment: Purpose and Process ........................................................................ 7 2.4 Overlap with the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Draft Leixlip Local Area Plan. ...... 9 2.5 Consultation Strategy .............................................................................................................. 9 2.6 How the AA process is applied within the Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter-07-Ecology.Pdf
    ELEMENT POWER IRELAND LTD. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MAIGHNE WIND FARM IN COUNTY KILDARE AND COUNTY MEATH VOLUME 2 – MAIN EIS CHAPTER 7 – ECOLOGY MARCH 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 7 ECOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 1 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 7.1.1 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1 7.2 Methodology ................................................................................................... 2 7.2.1 Relevant Guidance ........................................................................................... 2 7.2.2 Consultation ................................................................................................... 2 7.2.3 Desk Study ..................................................................................................... 2 7.2.4 Field Assessment ............................................................................................. 3 7.2.5 Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Assessment ..................................................... 17 7.3 Existing Environment ..................................................................................... 22 7.3.1 Overall Site in Context ................................................................................... 22 7.3.2 Designated Nature Conservation Sites .............................................................
    [Show full text]