DOCSLIB.ORG

History-2006-Legal-Legacy-Of-The-Lower-Cape-Fear-Samuel-Ashe-Excerpt.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History-2006-Legal-Legacy-Of-The-Lower-Cape-Fear-Samuel-Ashe-Excerpt.Pdf LEGAL LEGACY OF THE LOWER CAPE FEAR AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA COURTS FROM THE REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD A revision of articles by this author first appearing as Wilmington’s Legal Legacy and Legal Legacy of the Lower Cape Fear Distributed to The New Hanover County Bar Association between 2002 and the present time. By John W. Smith Superior Court Judge Wilmington, N.C. Excerpt: Samuel Ashe And the Birth of a Free State First State Senator, First Speaker, First Superior Court Judge After Independence, Governor John W. Smith is a graduate of Davidson College and Wake Forest Law School. He was elected as a District Court Judge for the Fifth Judicial District in 1988, and served as Chief District Judge from 1996 through 2001. In 2005, he was appointed as a Special Superior Court Judge. He and his wife Harriet lived in Wilmington, N.C., until 2008, when he was appointed Director of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts by Chief Justice Sarah Parker. Since his retirement in 2015, he has served as an Emergency Superior Court Judge. They now make their home in Raleigh. Legal Legacy of the Lower Cape Fear, © John W. Smith 2005; Revised with corrections through 2/13/2006. Page 1 Preface to Legal History of the Lower Cape Fear: a revision of articles titled “Wilmington’s Legal Legacy” first appearing in the New Hanover County Bar Association newsletter, BarBriefs. This series of articles was inspired by two events. The first was when the new courtrooms were about to be dedicated and Superior Court Judge Ernest Fullwood asked if we had a list of judges who had served the district. He had a plan to hang portraits of as many judges as could be identified. When I checked, there was no list. Not only was there no list, but a list could be developed only with great effort. And the list, as I began to assemble it, contained names totally unfamiliar to everybody in the court system. The second event occurred when a newly arrived attorney, who had taught legal history in a northern law school and whose wife was herself a historian, asked if I could recommend a book which gave the legal history of this area. While I knew of several great histories of our area, including the ones by Lawrence Lee, Alan D. Watson, and others, none of them really addressed the history of our courts, the judges who presided over them, or the development of our local legal institutions through the centuries. From these two events emerged a driving curiosity, and the more I looked, the more I became convinced that these were stories that needed to be collected and told. One fascinating personality led to the next. One history-making event interlocked with another. And so the process held me like a prisoner until the next captive who had been forgotten by time could be liberated. I am not a historian, nor do I pretend to that credentialed office occupied by academics I greatly respect and on whom I have relied. Nor am I a genealogist, although my family arrived and settled during the Scots migrations at the earliest time before the Revolution. But I have become an amateur on this subject in the best sense of the word. A love of the law, a love of the courts, and a love for the people on whose shoulders we stand all feed a desire that those who are curious might know the stories and have available the sources to follow them. This desire has driven this endeavor. And because it is the effort of the amateur, I am certain that those who have earned the right to be called historians are likely to find errors. I have used (some would say over-used) footnotes and references to make the information transparent as to the sources and to show how local events often blend with regional or national events. Because I have worked alone, and each of these articles build on to the next, and each taught me something new, there will be an unevenness to them when they are rearranged in chronological order, as I have done. For example, a footnote in the article on Daniel Russell, one of the first in the series, became an article in itself when I got to the article on his contemporary George Rountree, one of the last. While I chose each succeeding subject depending on what I learned from the previous articles, placing them in the proper order achieves the purpose I intended: to provide a comprehendible legal history of the Lower Cape Fear. And as I worked, it became apparent that these stories preserve more than a local history. Because of the ancient origins and position of Wilmington and New Hanover County, this history is both reflective of and influential in a larger context. As counties were borne from New Hanover, as new counties to the west were named for our local judges, as our local judges presided across the state and became state and national public figures, the events recorded in these accounts reverberate and often become a part of state and national events. Space constraints in the original articles compelled relegation to footnotes tidbits of this type which could better have been incorporated into the text had there been space available to develop them more thoroughly. These threads which are often mentioned, deserve more attention than the scope of this endeavor permitted. I want to thank my wife Harriet who, as an English Major from Wake Forest, suffered hours-on- end of proof reading; and sympathize with her despair over what must have been my frustrating insistence Legal Legacy of the Lower Cape Fear, © John W. Smith 2005; Revised with corrections through 2/13/2006. Page 2 on questions of “style” and inconsistent shorthand referencing. Any polish deserves her credit, and any blemish is stubbornly my own. I also want to thank Beverly Tetterton, Joe Shepard, and Eli Naher for their assistance. The North Carolina Room in the public library and the Latimer House archives are gems in the crown of Wilmington. Mining them with their help has, I hope, produced a work worthy of the title I have given it. I also need to thank the board of directors of the Bar Association for encouraging this project; and John Burns, the editor of BarBriefs who extended his deadlines and found space to present them. As the current president of the New Hanover County Bar Association, an organization which has roots back to pre-revolutionary war days, I recognize the importance of accurately preserving this research for those who are caught by a curiosity to know from whence we came. As any amateur must, I relish the advice of those more knowledgeable about any facts. Corrections, whether minor or major, are always appreciated. I hope that in the future if anyone asks the simple question of who are the judges who have served this district, that this may be a source for the answer. And as the lives of these who temporarily occupied the stage are read together, the fascinating story of how we came to be who we are as a society begins to shine through. While the picture which emerges is not always as pretty as we would like, it shows the struggle by which we arrived. And in the lessons of this history, may we avoid repeating that which we regret and aspire to that which we admire. But more than that, may we know from whence we came. It is with humility and a sense of having tackled a task greater than that for which I have time or talents that I give this research as a gift to the New Hanover County Bar Association, the people of the Lower Cape Fear, and my home state of North Carolina. John W. Smith District Court Judge Wilmington, December, 2004 Legal Legacy of the Lower Cape Fear, © John W. Smith 2005; Revised with corrections through 2/13/2006. Page 3 Legal Legacy of the Lower Cape Fear by John W. Smith Listing of Articles in the order in which they were originally published in the New Hanover County Bar Association newsletter, BarBriefs (Years given are dates of service as Superior Court Judge. Dates in brackets are dates of publication for original article.): I. 2002, Mar. Daniel Lindsay Russell: 1868-1874 [3/2002] Enigma Extraordinaire 2002, Oct. Special Edition: [10/2002] Dedication of the W. Allen Cobb Judicial Building, October, 2002 II. 2003, Apr. The Wilmington Law School [4/2003] III. 2003, Jun. Walter Parker Stacy: 1915-1920 [6/2003] Lawyer, Judge, and Chief Justice IV. 2003, Sep. New Hanover Superior Court Judges 1868-1913 [9/2003] Almand Alexander McKoy, Edward T. Boykin, Oliver H. Allen (Special Judges: Oliver Pendleton Meares, Egbert Kedar Bryan) V. 2003, Nov. Chief Justice Charles Berry: 1759-1765 [11/2003] A Tragedy in Colonial Wilmington: Death and Revolution VI. 2004, Mar. Samuel Ashe and the Birth of a Free State: 1777-1795 [3/2004] First State Senator, First Speaker, First Superior Court Judge After Independence, Governor VII. 2004, May Joshua Grainger Wright: 1808-1811 [5/2004] VIII. 2004, Sep. George Rountree: 1913-1916 [9/2004] IX. 2004, Nov.. The Moore Family: Part 1 Maurice Moore [11/04] X. 2005, Jan. The Moore Family: Part 2 Alfred Moore [1/05] XI 2005, Apr James Hasell and the Propagation of the Gospel [4/05] XII 2005, Sep. John Jay Burney [9/05] XIV 2006, Jan. Eleazer Allen of Lilliput [1/06] XV 2006, Oct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Letters of Janet Schaw, Loyalists In
    MAKING THE REVOLUTION: AMERICA, 1763-1791 PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION Library of Congress “farewell, unhappy land . you are devoted to ruin” A Scottish visitor views the treatment of Loyalists in North Carolina, 1775 Selections from the travel letters of Janet Schaw * While traveling for two years in North America, Scotswoman Janet Schaw arrived in North Carolina in early 1775 to visit her brother at Schawfield, his plantation near the port city of Wilmington. There she observed a society that was splitting asunder under the stress of revolutionary politics. Zealous patriots were forcing men and women along the Cape Fear River to take sides. They employed violence and Bowles, North America and the West Indies, map, intimidation and, Schaw suggests, even feigned a slave revolt to unite 1775, detail including middle and southern British their countrymen in opposition to the British. As the editor of Schaw’s Atlantic colonies; Wilmington, NC, encircled journal reminds us, “such contemporary evidence makes us realize that our forefathers, however worthy their object, were engaged in real rebellion and revolution, characterized by the extremes of thought and action that always accompany such movements, and not in the kind of parlor warfare described in many of our text books.”1 Spirited, intelligent, and outspoken, the daughter of an old and appa- rently well-off Scottish family, she was in her late thirties or early forties when she sailed for America. After leaving North Carolina, she visited Portugal and returned to Scotland in 1776, where she took up residence in Edinburgh. While the details of most of her life are unknown, her journal, a compilation of letters to a friend back in Scotland, provides a vivid record of her two years of travel.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Historical Review
    The North Carolina Historical Review Volume XX October, 1943 Number 4 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN CRAVEN COUNTY 1722-1835 By Alonzo Thomas Dill, Junior I No greater problem faced the counties of early North Caro- lina than the periodical new construction and almost continuous demand for repair of public buildings. The costliness of some materials and the scarcity of skilled labor were only part of the trouble. The frequent indifference of officials and their inept- ness at collecting and accounting for revenues added to the diffi- culty. Public building was therefore a long-drawn-out under- taking. Construction of a courthouse might last a decade or more, and during these years taxes would sometimes double, so far as county levies were concerned. The erection of such a building required much effort, and its completion was a real accomplishment—one which this opulent generation, with its federal grants-in-aid and easy long-term borrowing, cannot fully appreciate. Today's epidemic of federal construction has resulted in the erection of so many public buildings of all kinds that perhaps, too, it is difficult to realize just how important these structures were to the early life of North Carolina. The jails with their pillory, stocks, and whipping post, the powder magazines for the militia, the courthouses and later pest houses and poor houses, served as a kind of common social denominator in whose creation everyone who paid taxes had a share and in whose benefits or miseries a large proportion of the population took part. The courthouses are a good example of this.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Devoted to the Interests of His Race': Black Officeholders
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: “DEVOTED TO THE INTERESTS OF HIS RACE”: BLACK OFFICEHOLDERS AND THE POLITICAL CULTURE OF FREEDOM IN WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 1865-1877 Thanayi Michelle Jackson, Doctor of Philosophy, 2016 Dissertation directed by: Associate Professor Leslie S. Rowland Department of History This dissertation examines black officeholding in Wilmington, North Carolina, from emancipation in 1865 through 1876, when Democrats gained control of the state government and brought Reconstruction to an end. It considers the struggle for black office holding in the city, the black men who held office, the dynamic political culture of which they were a part, and their significance in the day-to-day lives of their constituents. Once they were enfranchised, black Wilmingtonians, who constituted a majority of the city’s population, used their voting leverage to negotiate the election of black men to public office. They did so by using Republican factionalism or what the dissertation argues was an alternative partisanship. Ultimately, it was not factional divisions, but voter suppression, gerrymandering, and constitutional revisions that made local government appointive rather than elective, Democrats at the state level chipped away at the political gains black Wilmingtonians had made. “DEVOTED TO THE INTERESTS OF HIS RACE”: BLACK OFFICEHOLDERS AND THE POLITICAL CULTURE OF FREEDOM IN WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 1865-1877 by Thanayi Michelle Jackson Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Advisory Committee: Associate Professor Leslie S. Rowland, Chair Associate Professor Elsa Barkley Brown Associate Professor Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Lindsay Russell (7 Aug
    Governors’ Papers Daniel L. Russell Page One GOVERNOR DANIEL L. RUSSELL, n.d., 1897-1901 Arrangement: By record series, then chronological Reprocessed by: James Mark Valsame Date: April 12, 2005 Daniel Lindsay Russell (7 Aug. 1845-14 May 1908), judge, congressman, and governor, was born at Winnabow plantation, in Brunswick County near Wilmington, the son of Daniel Lindsay and Carolina Sanders Russell. Both the Russell and Sanders families were wealthy and owned large numbers of slaves. Few people in North Carolina were such ardent Democrats or more enthusiastic about the cause of secession than the planters of the Lower Cape Fear. Yet in this respect Russell's immediate background was different. His father and his maternal grandfather, David W. Sanders, were active Whigs, and in 1860 the fifteen-year-old Russell and his father took the highly unpopular course of opposing secession. The following spring, however, when war became a reality, young Russell, then a student at The University of North Carolina, left Chapel Hill and returned home, where he and his father each organized a Confederate company and was commissioned captain. If the two Russells had been converted to the cause of secession, neither of them showed the slightest inclination to give up his established habit of quarreling with those gentlemen who were now the chief Confederate leaders. First, the Russells objected to the nature of their military assignments and applied to have their companies transferred to combat duty with the Army of Northern Virginia. Yet each was assigned to routine garrison duties around the forts of the Lower Cape Fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew Am C Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew aM c Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mac Donald, James Matthew, "Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3625. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3625 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POLITICS OF THE PERSONAL IN THE OLD NORTH STATE: GRIFFITH RUTHERFORD IN REVOLUTIONARY NORTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By James M. Mac Donald B.A., University of Delaware, 1995 M.A., Appalachian State University, 1997 May, 2006 To My Parents ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my committee for their support and suggestions during the writing of my dissertation. As a student, I had the good fortune of taking seminars with each member beginning with my first graduate class at LSU. Mark Thompson became director late in the course of the project and generously agreed to chair the committee during the last semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Leaders of North Carolina
    North Carolina State Normal & Industrial College Historical Publications Number 2 REVOLUTIONARY LEADERS OF NORTH CAROLINA BY R. D. W. CONNOR SECRETARY NORTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL COMMISSION Lecturer on North Carolina History, State Normal College Issued under the Direction of the Department of History W. C. JACKSON, EDITOR PUBLISHED BY THE COLLEGE 1916 PRESSES OF THE PETRIE COMPANY HIOH POINT. N. C I NORTH CAROLINA FROM 1765 TO 1790 INTRODUCTORY LECTURE Two periods in the history of the United States seem to me to stand out above all others in dramatic interest and historic importance. One is the decade from 1860 to 1870, the other is the quarter-century from 1765 to 1790. Of the two both in interest and importance precedence must be given to the latter. The former was a period of almost superhuman ef fort, achievement, and sacrifice for the preservation of the life of the nation, but it did not evolve any new social, political, or economic principles. Great prin ciples already thought out and established were saved from annihilation, and given a broader scope than ever before in the history of mankind, but no new idea or ideal was involved in the struggle. The ideas and ideals involved in the struggle of the sixties were those that had already been established during the quarter-century from 1765 to 1790. That epoch was a period of origins. Ideas and ideals of government developed in America then came into conflict with the ideas and ideals of Europe. Colonies founded on these new principles revolted against the old, threw off the yoke of their mother country, organized inde pendent states, and having achieved their independ ence, established a self-governing nation on the fed eral principle on a scale never before attempted in the history of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • S3430 Jacob Grammer (Gremmer, Grimmer)
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Jacob Grammer (Gremmer, Grimmer) S3430 f19NC Transcribed by Will Graves 1/10/08 rev'd 9/22/15 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as
    [Show full text]
  • This 1983 Report Was Revised Into an Article in June 1993 by Wilson Angley for the North Carolina Maritime History Council Journal Tributaries
    AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE EXETER SITE IN PENDER COUNTY by This 1983 report was revised into an article in June 1993 by Wilson Angley for the North Carolina Maritime History Council Journal Tributaries. It was published in the October 199~ issue of that journal . A copy of the June 1993 article submitted has been inserted at the back of the 1983 herein report, as well ~s a copy of the letter about the submission from Angley to Tributaries' editor Mr . Mike Alford. • • • AN HIS'IORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE EXETER SITE IN PENDER CCAJNI'Y • by Wilson Angley September 8, 1982 • From the early stages of European exploration and settlement of North • Caroli na, the lands along the Northeast Cape Fear River and its t ributaries were recognized as a prime area for agricultural development and the produc- tion of lLUnber and naval stores. In August of 1662 the New Englander, William Hilton, set sail from Massachusetts Bay aboard the ship Adventure, bound for the Cape Fear region. After several failures to reach his appointed destination, he entered the mouth of the Cape Fear on the morning of CCtober 4, 1662 . For more than three weeks Hilton and his associates explored the stream. Taking the Adventure as far as present-day Wilmington, he then proceeded by small boat up the Northeast branch, which he took to be a continuation of the main river. Hilton is thought to have reached a point approximately sixty miles upstream from the ocean bar.1 According to historian E. Lawrence Lee ' s reading of Hilton' s own account: He and his associates were pleased with the fertile and • abundant land, with the flourishing vegetation and plentiful game , and with the climate that was ' ye most temperate of ye temperate zone.' They were also impressed by the meadows and upland fields along the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Willtown an Archaeological and Historical Perspective
    willtown an archaeological and historical perspective Archaeological Contributions 27 the Charleston Museum 19 99 Willtown: An Archaeolgocial and Historical Perspective Martha Zierden Suzanne Linder Ronald Anthony with contributions by: Andrew Agha Jennifer Webber Elizabeth Reitz Jean Porter Genevieve Brown James Catto Elizabeth Garrett Hayden Smith Matthew Tankersley Marta Thacker The Charleston Museum Archaeological Contributions 27 May 1999 0c 1999 The South Carolina Department of Archives & History Produced for The Charleston Museum and Hugh C. Lane, Sr. Designer: Judith M. Andrews Assistant: Tim Belshaw ISBN 1-880067-53-6 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................. xi I. Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Site description ................................................................................................. 2 Previous research ............................................................................................... 2 Comparative data base ....................................................................................... 7 Theoretical basis ............................................................................................... 9 Interpretive issues ........................................................................................... 12 II. The Willtown Community Exploration and settlement of Carolina ....................................................... 15 Protection of the colony................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notable & Famous Harvard Veterans
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . Telephone: (978) 443-9532 30 Monument Square Email: [email protected] Concord, Mass. 01742-1895 18 July 2017 From: Captain Paul E. Mawn USN (Ret.) To: Advocates for Harvard ROTC Subject: Notable military veterans among Harvard alumni At this point, the below preliminary list of notable Harvard alumni veterans is not intended to be exhaustive. If you know if anyone that has been left out, please contact Captain Paul E. Mawn USN (Ret.) at 1-978-443-9532 (i.e. particularly relatives and classmates from World War II to the current World War on Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism). I. Notable Harvard Veterans HARVARD COLLEGE by CLASS 1746 Brigadier General John Ashe Continental Militia (North Carolina State Troops) [Died from disease as a POW] Born to a prominent family in Grovely, Brunswick County, North Carolina in 1720 was the son of the Speaker of the Colonial Assembly in 1726 & 1727. John’s younger brother was Governor Samuel Ashe (1725-1813), for whom Asheville, North Carolina was named. After Harvard, John enlisted in the NC militia during the French and Indian War and was elected Speaker of the colonial assembly from 1762 to 1765. He was an outspoken opponent of the Stamp Act and supported independence from Great Britain. After serving in the NC Provincial Congress, he joined the committees of correspondence and safety as hostilities between the colonies and Great Britain began to rise. As a militia commander of 500 men, Major Ashe destroyed the British garrison of Fort Johnston near Wilmington (NC) in 1775. As a colonel, he raised and equipped a regiment at his own expense which he led in the American victory at the Battle of Moore's Creek Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Halifax Resolves” (See Slide 57)
    North Carolina’s Founding Fathers www.carolana.com J.D. Lewis © 2018 – J.D. Lewis – All Rights Reserved Little River, SC Terms of Use: Any or all parts of this slideshow may be used by anyone for any purpose free of charge – with one stipulation. The user must cite “www.carolana.com” as the source and may not alter any material used. 2 Table of Contents Topic Slide No. Quick Lookback at Representative Gov’t 4 NC Quick Lookback (1629 to 1775) 10 NC Provincial Government (1774-1776) 35 NC State Government (1776-1790) 62 Sources 159 Appendix A – NC Founding Fathers by County 162 3 Quick Lookback at Representative Government 4 Ancient Democracies, Republics & Constitutions • Athenian democracy developed around the fifth century BC in the Greek city-state of Athens. Spread to other city-states. • It was a system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. This was not considered to be a “representative government,” however. • To vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a slave, or a woman. • Leaders elected at random by citizens. • Solonian Constitution drafted in 594 BC. Greek Senate c. 450 BC • Indian City State of Vaishali functioned as what would be called a Republic. There were other similar city-states, all in northern India. • Decision making by voting of two primary groups: Martial or warrior class Trade guilds/agriculturists class • Code of Manu issued in 3rd Century BC. North Indian Assembly c.400 BC • Two Consuls – executive leaders • Senate comprised of 300 upper class citizens • Tribune comprised of 10 lower class citizens • Citizen Assemblies (adult males only) • Two-party system – Patricians & Plebians • Leaders elected lower members • Considered to be a Republic • 12 Tables (constitution-like) codified in 450 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • SCAR Lifetime Achievement Awards Presented at Eutaws Conference
    Vol. 3 Nos. 10 – 11 __________________________________________ __October - November 2006 SCAR Lifetime Achievement Awards Presented at Eutaws Conference Dr. Dennis M. Conrad is awarded the 2006 SCAR Lifetime Achievement Award in Historic Research for his service as editor and project director of the monumental Papers of General Nathanael Greene where he directed the completion of volumes 7 through 12 of that series covering Greene’s campaigns in the South. He also served as contributing editor for volume 13, the final volume in the series that was published late last year. Gen. Greene was also the subject of Conrad’s doctoral dissertation at Duke University. Dennis now works as an historian at the early history branch of the Naval Historical Center. There he helps edit the Naval Documents of the American Revolution series. Prior to coming to the NHC, he wrote about John Paul Jones with E. Gordon Bowen-Hassell and Mark L. Hayes in Sea Raiders of the American Revolution: The Continental Navy in Dennis M. Conrad European Waters. i Lifetime Achievement in Historic Research Dr. George D. Fields, Jr. is the Director of the Military Heritage Program of the Palmetto Conservation Foundation. George is awarded the 2006 SCAR Lifetime Achievement Award for Battlefield Preservation for providing advocacy and leadership of successful programs to preserve Revolutionary War battlefields in South Carolina including: Battles of Camden, Musgrove Mill, and Blackstock’s Plantation, Marion’s camps at Snow Island and Lee’s trenches at Ninety-Six National Historic Site. The Military Heritage Program has also assisted in various improvement programs at Cowpens National Battlefield, Earle’s Ford, Eutaw Springs, Fish Dam Ford Battlefield, Cedar Spring battlefields, and Fort Charlotte.
    [Show full text]