Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Conservation Fund (SVGCF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Conservation Fund (SVGCF) ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY This report has been prepared in fulfillment of St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ reporting obligations as a Party to the Convention on Biological Diversity. It provides a review of progress in the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Support for the preparation of this report was provided by the Global Environment Facility and the United Nations Development Programme. Cover photo © Thérèse N. Yarde ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES’ SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY MAY 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 National Biodiversity Targets 21 Implementation 23 Aichi Biodiversity Target 1: Awareness increased 23 Aichi Biodiversity Target 2: Biodiversity values integrated 30 Aichi Biodiversity Target 3: Incentives reformed 35 Aichi Biodiversity Target 4: Sustainable consumption and production 38 Aichi Biodiversity Target 5: Habitat loss halved or reduced 42 Aichi Biodiversity Target 6: Sustainable management of marine living resources 47 Aichi Biodiversity Target 7: Sustainable agriculture, aquaculture and forestry 52 Aichi Biodiversity Target 8: Po!ution reduced 57 Aichi Biodiversity Target 9: Invasive alien species prevented and contro!ed 61 Aichi Biodiversity Target 10: Pressures on vulnerable ecosystems reduced 65 Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: Protected areas increased and improved 67 Aichi Biodiversity Target 12: Extinction prevented 77 Aichi Biodiversity Target 13: Genetic diversity maintained 83 Aichi Biodiversity Target 14: Ecosystems and essential services safeguarded 83 Aichi Biodiversity Target 15: Ecosystems restored and resilience enhanced 90 Aichi Biodiversity Target 16: Nagoya Protocol in force and operational 94 Aichi Biodiversity Target 17: NBSAPS adopted as a policy instrument 95 Aichi Biodiversity Target 18: Traditional knowledge respected 98 Aichi Biodiversity Target 19: Knowledge improved, shared, and applied 102 Aichi Biodiversity Target 20: Financial resources "om a! sources increased 106 Progress Assessment 110 Aichi Biodiversity Target 1: Awareness increased 110 Aichi Biodiversity Target 2: Biodiversity values integrated 111 Aichi Biodiversity Target 3: Incentives reformed 113 Aichi Biodiversity Target 4: Sustainable consumption and production 114 Aichi Biodiversity Target 5: Habitat loss halved or reduced 115 Aichi Biodiversity Target 6: Sustainable management of marine living resources 116 Aichi Biodiversity Target 7: Sustainable agriculture, aquaculture and forestry 119 Aichi Biodiversity Target 8: Po!ution reduced 120 Aichi Biodiversity Target 9: Invasive alien species prevented and contro!ed 121 Aichi Biodiversity Target 10: Pressures on vulnerable ecosystems reduced 122 Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: Protected areas increased and improved 123 Aichi Biodiversity Target 12: Extinction prevented 125 Aichi Biodiversity Target 13: Genetic diversity maintained 127 Aichi Biodiversity Target 14: Ecosystems and essential services safeguarded 128 Aichi Biodiversity Target 15: Ecosystems restored and resilience enhanced 129 Aichi Biodiversity Target 16: Nagoya Protocol in force and operational 130 Aichi Biodiversity Target 17: NBSAPS adopted as a policy instrument 131 Aichi Biodiversity Target 18: Traditional knowledge respected 132 Aichi Biodiversity Target 19: Knowledge improved, shared, and applied 134 Aichi Biodiversity Target 20: Financial resources "om a! sources increased 135 National Contributions to the achievement of each global Aichi Biodiversity 136 Target Bibliography 147 Annex I: Correspondence between the ABTs and the NESDP and NOP 156 Annex II: Updated biodiversity profile 166 Annex III: Stakeholder engagement for 6NR preparation 178 Annex IV: 6NR Communications Strategy 187 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 6NR Sixth National Report to the GNMPA Grenadines Network of Convention on Biological Marine Protected Areas Diversity ABS Access and Benefit-Sharing IICA Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture ABT Aichi Biodiversity Target IWMP Integrated Watershed Management Plan BIOPAMA Biodiversity and Protected IUCN International Union for Areas Management Conservation of Nature BIP Biodiversity Indicators IUU Illegal, unreported, and Partnership unregulated CBD Convention on Biological KBA Key biodiversity area Diversity CBO Community-based LEK Local ecological knowledge organization CEPA Communications, education, MPA Marine Protected Area and public awareness CITES Convention on International NAEP National Avian Education Trade in Endangered Species Programme of Wild Fauna and Flora CWSA Central Water and Sewerage NBSAP National Biodiversity Authority Strategy and Action Plan EC$ Eastern Caribbean dollars NDC Statement of Nationally Determined Contributions ECMANN Eastern Caribbean Marine NESDP National Economic and Managed Areas Network Social Development Plan EIA Environmental impact NGO Non-governmental assessment organization EPIC Environmental Protection in NOP National Ocean Policy the Caribbean FAO Food and Agriculture OECS Organisation of Eastern Organization of the United Caribbean States Nations GEF Global Environment Facility PIF Project identification form SCIENCE Science Initiative for SVGPF St. Vincent and the Environmental Conservation Grenadines Preservation and Education Fund SCMCA South Coast Marine TCMP Tobago Cays Marine Park Conservation Area SVG St. Vincent and the UNFCCC United Nations Framework Grenadines Convention on Climate Change SVGCF St. Vincent and the Grenadines Conservation Fund EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This sixth national report (6NR) has been prepared in fulfillment of St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ obligations as a Party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and is a description and assessment of the country’s implementation of the CBD and the global Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Parties’ 6NRs to the CBD are of particular significance, as they will inform the final review of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and the development of a new post-2020 international biodiversity framework. The 6NR was prepared using a participatory process that engaged and involved over 40 organizations, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBOs), and the private sector. Key Findings Some of St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ biodiversity success stories are: • Mainstreaming biodiversity values into national development strategy via the National Economic and Social Development Plan 2013-2025 (NESDP); • Drafting of new policies to support the sustainable management and use of ocean biodiversity and living marine resources; • The establishment and operation of innovative new funding mechanisms for biodiversity conservation and management, such as the St. Vincent and the Grenadines Preservation Fund (SVGPF); • The ongoing restoration of Ashton Lagoon, the country’s largest remaining mangrove ecosystem and a globally recognized key biodiversity area (KBA). Areas that require additional resources, capacity, and attention include: • Integrating biodiversity and ecosystem-based approaches into national climate change adaptation and resilience strategies; • Taking action to reduce deforestation and enhance climate-change mitigation via land-use, land-use change and forestry activities; • Managing and controlling introduced and invasive species and their ecological and economic impacts, including impacts on agriculture; • Improving the availability, sharing, and application of scientific data and promoting science-based decision making; !1 • Implementing biodiversity-friendly incentives/subsidies and reforming/removing biodiversity-harmful incentive/subsidies, with consideration of how incentive reform could increase financing for biodiversity. Further findings are summarized in the below 6NR synopsis table. St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ progress is evaluated with reference to the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets (ABTs). In the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, these Targets are clustered under five strategic goals: A. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society; B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use; C. improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity; D. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services; E. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity-building. In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the greatest degree of progress has been observed towards Strategic Goal A, addressing the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society. The highlight in this regard is the extensive incorporation of biodiversity-related objectives in the NESDP and other national polices (some of which are still in draft). The NESDP includes objectives relevant to 15 of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, indicating policy recognition of the value of biodiversity for St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ sustainable development. The inclusion of biodiversity values in the NESDP provides a basis for mobilizing and leveraging resources to support initiatives for biodiversity conservation, management, and sustainable use. Least progress has been made in relation to Strategic Goal E, enhancing implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management, and capacity-building. This goal
Recommended publications
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    Saint Vincent and the Grenadines INTRODUCTION located on Saint Vincent, Bequia, Canouan, Mustique, and Union Island. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a multi-island Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, like most of state in the Eastern Caribbean. The islands have a the English-speaking Caribbean, has a British combined land area of 389 km2. Saint Vincent, with colonial past. The country gained independence in an area of 344 km2, is the largest island (1). The 1979, but continues to operate under a Westminster- Grenadines include 7 inhabited islands and 23 style parliamentary democracy. It is politically stable uninhabited cays and islets. All the islands are and elections are held every five years, the most accessible by sea transport. Airport facilities are recent in December 2010. Christianity is the Health in the Americas, 2012 Edition: Country Volume N ’ Pan American Health Organization, 2012 HEALTH IN THE AMERICAS, 2012 N COUNTRY VOLUME dominant religion, and the official language is fairly constant at 2.1–2.2 per woman. The crude English (1). death rate also remained constant at between 70 and In 2001 the population of Saint Vincent and 80 per 10,000 population (4). Saint Vincent and the the Grenadines was 102,631. In 2006, the estimated Grenadines has experienced fluctuations in its population was 100,271 and in 2009, it was 101,016, population over the past 20 years as a result of a decrease of 1,615 (1.6%) with respect to 2001. The emigration. According to the CIA World Factbook, sex distribution of the population in 2009 was almost the net migration rate in 2008 was estimated at 7.56 even, with males accounting for 50.5% (50,983) and migrants per 1,000 population (5).
    [Show full text]
  • GRIIS Records of Verified Introduced and Invasive Species
    Evidence Verification Species Authority Country Kingdom Environment/System Origin of Impacts Date Source (Y/N) (Y/N) Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Abrus precatorius L. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Acacia auriculiformis Benth. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Invasive Species Specialist Group (2015). Saint Vincent and the Global Invasive Species Database. Adenanthera pavonina L. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the Invasive Species Specialist Group (2015). Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 Animalia terrestrial/freshwater Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Global Invasive Species Database. Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Ageratum conyzoides L. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Albizia procera Benth. (Roxb.) Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Albizia saman (Jacq.) Merr. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Aleurites moluccanus (L.) Willd. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Allamanda cathartica L. Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014). CABI Invasive Alpinia purpurata K.Schum. (Vieill.) Plantae terrestrial Alien No Yes 2017 Grenadines Species Compendium (ISC). Saint Vincent and the CAB International (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • SAINT VINCENT and the GRENADINES Pilot Program For
    SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES PPCR PHASE 1 PROPOSAL SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) PHASE ONE PROPOSAL 1 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES PPCR PHASE 1 PROPOSAL Contents Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations .................................................................................. 5 Summary of Phase 1 Grant Proposal ................................................................................... 7 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND....................................................................................... 10 1.1 National Overview .................................................................................................. 11 1.1.1. Country Context ......................................................................................................... 11 2.0. Vulnerability Context .................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Climate .................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Precipitation ............................................................................................................... 14 2.1.2 Temperature ................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.3 Sea Level Rise ............................................................................................................. 15 2.1.4 Climate Extremes .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lowrie, K., M. Friesen, D. Lowrie, and N. Collier. 2009. Year 1 Results Of
    2009 Year 1 Results of Seabird Breeding Atlas of the Lesser Antilles Katharine Lowrie, Project Manager Megan Friesen, Research Assistant David Lowrie, Captain and Surveyor Natalia Collier, President Environmental Protection In the Caribbean 200 Dr. M.L. King Jr. Blvd. Riviera Beach, FL 33404 www.epicislands.org Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Field Work Overview ........................................................................................................................... 4 Water‐based Surveys ...................................................................................................................... 4 Data Recorded ................................................................................................................................. 5 Land‐based Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 5 Large Colonies ................................................................................................................................. 6 Audubon’s Shearwater .................................................................................................................... 7 Threats Survey Method .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago the Creole Archipelago
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE CREOLE ARCHIPELAGO: COLONIZATION, EXPERIMENTATION, AND COMMUNITY IN THE SOUTHERN CARIBBEAN, C. 1700-1796 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY TESSA MURPHY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MARCH 2016 Table of Contents List of Tables …iii List of Maps …iv Dissertation Abstract …v Acknowledgements …x PART I Introduction …1 1. Creating the Creole Archipelago: The Settlement of the Southern Caribbean, 1650-1760...20 PART II 2. Colonizing the Caribbean Frontier, 1763-1773 …71 3. Accommodating Local Knowledge: Experimentations and Concessions in the Southern Caribbean …115 4. Recreating the Creole Archipelago …164 PART III 5. The American Revolution and the Resurgence of the Creole Archipelago, 1774-1785 …210 6. The French Revolution and the Demise of the Creole Archipelago …251 Epilogue …290 Appendix A: Lands Leased to Existing Inhabitants of Dominica …301 Appendix B: Lands Leased to Existing Inhabitants of St. Vincent …310 A Note on Sources …316 Bibliography …319 ii List of Tables 1.1: Respective Populations of France’s Windward Island Colonies, 1671 & 1700 …32 1.2: Respective Populations of Martinique, Grenada, St. Lucia, Dominica, and St. Vincent c.1730 …39 1.3: Change in Reported Population of Free People of Color in Martinique, 1732-1733 …46 1.4: Increase in Reported Populations of Dominica & St. Lucia, 1730-1745 …50 1.5: Enslaved Africans Reported as Disembarking in the Lesser Antilles, 1626-1762 …57 1.6: Enslaved Africans Reported as Disembarking in Jamaica & Saint-Domingue, 1526-1762 …58 2.1: Reported Populations of the Ceded Islands c.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Projects- Stewardfish Microgrants Scheme for Caribbean Fisherfolk Organisations
    List of projects- StewardFish Microgrants Scheme for Caribbean Fisherfolk Organisations On July 1, 2020 CANARI launched the call for applications for the USD20,000 StewardFish Microgrants Scheme for Caribbean Fisherfolk Organisations. The overall goal of the microgrant scheme is to provide support to Caribbean fisherfolk organisations for organisational strengthening initiatives that will enhance their capacity to participate in coastal and marine resources governance and management, including ecosystem stewardship. The call targeted the following five fisherfolk organisations participating in StewardFish: 1. Barbuda Fisherfolk Association – Antigua and Barbuda 2. Barbados National Union of Fisherfolk Organisations (BARNUFO) – Barbados 3. Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation (GNFO)- Guyana 4. Saint Lucia Fisherfolk Cooperative Society Limited – Saint Lucia 5. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Fisherfolks Co-Operative Limited (SVGNFO) – Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Each of the targeted fisherfolk organisations successfully submitted proposals to the microgrant scheme and were each awarded a USD4,000 microgrant for their projects which will run from November 2020 to April 2021. Table 1: List of StewardFish fisherfolk organisational strengthening projects Fisherfolk organisation Project title Project goal Barbados National iFish: Piloting an online To promote organisational strengthening Union of Fisherfolk platform for of BARNUFO to effectively mobilise Organizations organisational resources and build the capacity of its (BARNUFO)
    [Show full text]
  • Grenadines Seabird Conservation Management Plan
    Grenadines Seabird Conservation Management Plan Community-based Conservation Management Plan for the Seabirds of the Transboundary Grenadines Archipelago Juliana Coffey and Natalia Collier 2 About EPIC: Environmental Protection in the Caribbean (EPIC) is an independent non-profit founded in 2000 with the mission of protecting the Caribbean environment through research, restoration, education and advocacy. EPIC is a results-driven organization that works on challenging, under-addressed issues through holistic programs resulting in strategic community-based actions. By recognizing the connections between ecological health, economic vitality, and the quality of life for Caribbean residents, EPIC’s work supports the vision of Caribbean communities leading the way towards a more resilient and sustainable future for everyone. To learn more about EPIC and its Caribbean initiatives visit our website at epicislands.org or find EPIC islands on social media. Contact EPIC: 411 Walnut Street #6749 Green Cove Springs, FL 32043 USA https://epicislands.org [email protected] Recommended citation: Coffey, J. and N. Collier. 2020. Community-based Conservation Management Plan for the Seabirds of the Transboundary Grenadines Archipelago. Environmental Protection in the Caribbean, 67 pp Cover image: Red-footed boobies on Diamond Rock, Grenada (Juliana Coffey) . 3 Acknowledgements Environmental Protection in the Caribbean would like to thank all stakeholders consulted during this process for providing their input and expertise. Over one hundred stakeholders representing various departments, agencies and sectors were consulted in this process of developing a representative community-based conservation management plan, and therefor all cannot be listed individually. We would especially like to thank Fitzgerald Providence of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines’ Forestry Department, Anthony Jeremiah of Grenada’s Forestry Department and the Ministry of Carriacou and Petite Martinique Affairs, the Tobago Cays Marine Park and Sandy Island Oyster Bed Marine Protected Area management and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployment of an AWAC Off the East Coast of St Vincent, 2018-2019 Judith Wolf, Giles Williams and James Ayliffe
    National Oceanography Centre Research & Consultancy Report No. 69 Deployment of an AWAC off the east coast of St Vincent, 2018-2019 Judith Wolf, Giles Williams and James Ayliffe October 2019 This report is part of the NOC-led project “Climate Change Impact Assessment: Ocean Modelling and Monitoring for the Caribbean CME states”, 2018-2019; under the Commonwealth Marine Economies (CME) Programme in the Caribbean. National Oceanography Centre Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow St Liverpool L3 5DA UK email: [email protected] 1 2 Table of Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Background, aim and objectives of the study .......................................................... 7 1.2 Study Area – Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ..................................................... 7 1.3 Oceanographic description of the study area .......................................................... 9 2 Purchase of a wave gauge for St Vincent and Grenadines .......................................... 10 3 AWAC deployment ....................................................................................................... 11 3.1 July-October 2018................................................................................................. 14 3.2 January-March 2019 ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Managua Challenge National
    Meeting The Managua Challenge In November 2000, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) challenged governments of the Americas to accelerate their destruction of stockpiled antipersonnel mines ahead of the September 2001 meeting of States Parties to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, which will be held in Managua, Nicaragua. It also urged the remaining signatories and non- signatories to fully join the treaty by September 2001 and for all States Parties to submit their initial transparency reports as required under Article 7 of the ban treaty. An update on this Managua Challenge shows significant progress made by many countries since November 2000 to meet the Challenge: Three signatories ratified: Chile, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Uruguay. Three States Parties have completed stockpile destruction: Ecuador, Honduras, and Peru. Argentina, Chile, Nicaragua, and Uruguay destroyed some stockpiled mines. Six more States Parties have submitted their initial transparency reports:Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Paraguay. Two States Parties enacted national implementation legislation in 2001:Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago. One States Party will reduce the number of antipersonnel mines retained for training and development, as permitted under the Article 3 of the treaty: Peru will reduce the number from 9,526 to 5,578. Thirty of the thirty-five countries in the Americas region are State Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty. Since November 2000, there have been three ratifications: Uruguay (7 June 2001), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (1 August 2001), and Chile (10 September 2001). Three remaining signatories that have not ratified: Guyana, Haiti, and Suriname. Cuba and the United States remain the only two countries in the region that have not joined the Mine Ban Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • On Leaving and Joining Africanness Through Religion: the 'Black Caribs' Across Multiple Diasporic Horizons
    Journal of Religion in Africa 37 (2007) 174-211 www.brill.nl/jra On Leaving and Joining Africanness Th rough Religion: Th e ‘Black Caribs’ Across Multiple Diasporic Horizons Paul Christopher Johnson University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Center for Afroamerican and African Studies, 505 S. State St./4700 Haven, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045, USA [email protected] Abstract Garifuna religion is derived from a confluence of Amerindian, African and European anteced- ents. For the Garifuna in Central America, the spatial focus of authentic religious practice has for over two centuries been that of their former homeland and site of ethnogenesis, the island of St Vincent. It is from St Vincent that the ancestors return, through spirit possession, to join with their living descendants in ritual events. During the last generation, about a third of the population migrated to the US, especially to New York City. Th is departure created a new dia- sporic horizon, as the Central American villages left behind now acquired their own aura of ancestral fidelity and religious power. Yet New-York-based Garifuna are now giving attention to the African components of their story of origin, to a degree that has not occurred in homeland villages of Honduras. Th is essay considers the notion of ‘leaving’ and ‘joining’ the African diaspora by examining religious components of Garifuna social formation on St Vincent, the deportation to Central America, and contemporary processes of Africanization being initiated in New York. Keywords Garifuna, Black Carib, religion, diaspora, migration Introduction Not all religions, or families of religions, are of the diasporic kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraspecific and Intergeneric Behavioural Interactions of Sphaerodactylus Kirbyi and Gonatodes Daudini (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae) on Union Island, St
    SALAMANDRA 47(1) 9–16 20Behavioural February 2011 interactionsISSN of 0036–3375 two West Indian geckos Intraspecific and intergeneric behavioural interactions of Sphaerodactylus kirbyi and Gonatodes daudini (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae) on Union Island, St. Vincent and Grenadines Mel José Rivera Rodríguez 1, Ehren J. Bentz 2, Rebecca R. John 3 & Robert Powell 4 1) Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00681 2) Feather River College, Quincy, California 95971, USA (current address: Department of Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA) 3) Rebecca R. John, Departments of Environmental Studies and Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA 4) Robert Powell, Department of Biology, Avila University, Kansas City, Missouri 64145, USA Corresponding author: Robert Powell, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 10 September 2010 Abstract. In June 2010, on Union Island, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, we staged intraspecific and intergeneric interac- tions between Sphaerodactylus kirbyi and Gonatodes daudini (Sphaerodactylidae), which occur in sympatry and occasional syntopy on the slopes above Chatham Bay. Frequencies of most behaviours and frequencies of aggressive, submissive, and neutral behaviours did not differ significantly between sexes within species or between the two species. In general, the -be havioural repertoires of the two species were similar to those previously described for congeners. Visual cues appeared to be important in sex- and species-recognition, although vomerolfaction seemed to assume an increasing level of importance with proximity. Intergeneric interactions generally involved behaviours employed for species recognition, with neither spe- cies exhibiting aggressive behaviours that might facilitate niche partitioning. Key words. Aggressive behaviours, intergeneric interactions, intraspecific interactions,neutral behaviours, sex recognition, social behaviour, species recognition, submissive behaviours.
    [Show full text]