DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Lakes Coastal Program Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Great Lakes Coastal Program Strategic Plan U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE The Coastal Program ~ Strategic Plan ~ Stewardship of Fish and Wildlife Through Voluntary Conservation Regional Step-Down Plan Region 3 - “Great Lakes -Big Rivers” Part 2 of 3 FY 2007-2011 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 II. Regional Overview..................................................................................................................... 3 Wetland Habitat Types............................................................................................................... 3 Coastal Upland Habitat Types ................................................................................................... 4 Stream/Riparian Habitat Types.................................................................................................. 5 Issues and Risks ......................................................................................................................... 6 Cooperative Conservation.......................................................................................................... 6 III. Goal One: Conserving Habitat................................................................................................. 7 Regional Objectives ................................................................................................................... 7 Key Strategic Activities ............................................................................................................. 7 Performance Measures............................................................................................................... 7 Geographic Focus Areas ............................................................................................................ 8 Duluth-Superior Harbor/St. Louis River Estuary and Watershed Focus Area........................ 9 Superior Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat Initiative Focus Area........................................ 13 Wisconsin Green Bay Watershed Focus Area………………………………………………16 Illinois Lake Michigan Basin Focus Area ............................................................................. 20 Indiana Coastal Zone Focus Area.......................................................................................... 24 Brevort to Lower Grand Focus Area ..................................................................................... 27 Michigan Green Bay Watershed Focus Area………………………………………………..30 Salmon Trout River Watershed Focus Area.......................................................................... 33 Thunder Bay and Watershed Focus Area .............................................................................. 37 Saginaw Bay and Watershed Focus Area.............................................................................. 40 Lower Detroit River and System Focus Area........................................................................ 43 Western Lake Erie Focus Area.............................................................................................. 46 Coastal Program – Great Lakes Five-year Performance Targets............................................. 49 IV. Goal Two: Broaden and Strengthen Partnerships................................................................... 50 Regional Objectives ................................................................................................................. 50 Key Strategic Activities ........................................................................................................... 51 Performance Measures............................................................................................................. 51 V. Goal Three: Improve Information Sharing and Communication............................................ 52 Regional Objectives ................................................................................................................. 52 Key Strategic Activities ........................................................................................................... 52 Performance Measures............................................................................................................. 53 VI. Goal Four: Enhance Our Workforce...................................................................................... 53 Regional Objectives ................................................................................................................. 54 Key Strategic Activities ........................................................................................................... 54 Performance Measures............................................................................................................. 54 VII. Goal Five: Increase Accountability...................................................................................... 55 Regional Objectives ................................................................................................................. 55 Key Strategic Activities ........................................................................................................... 55 Performance Measures............................................................................................................. 56 VIII. Stakeholder Involvement ..................................................................................................... 57 ii List of Figures Figure 1. Location of Coastal Program Focus Areas in the Great Lakes. ..................................... 9 Figure 2. Duluth-Superior Harbor/St. Louis River Estuary and Watershed Focus Area............. 10 Figure 3. Superior Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat Initiative Focus Area............................... 14 Figure 5. Illinois Lake Michigan Basin Focus Area.................................................................... 21 Figure 6. Indiana Coastal Zone Focus Area................................................................................. 24 Figure 7. Brevort to Lower Grand Focus Area............................................................................ 27 Figure 9. Salmon Trout River Watershed Focus Area................................................................. 34 Figure 10. Thunder Bay and Watershed Focus Area................................................................... 38 Figure 11. Saginaw Bay and Watershed Focus Area................................................................... 41 Figure 12. Lower Detroit River and System Focus Area............................................................. 44 Figure 13. Western Lake Erie Focus Area................................................................................... 47 List of Appendices Appendix A: Preliminary List of Great Lakes Coastal Program Focal Species........................... 59 Appendix B: Relevant Conservation Plans and Other References ............................................... 60 Appendix C: List of Coastal Program – Great Lakes Partners ..................................................... 62 Appendix D: Coastal Program Great Lakes Internal Guidance………………………………….64 iii I. Introduction The Nation’s coastal areas and shorelines support myriad terrestrial and marine ecosystems, and as a result, are critical to human endeavors. Fish and wildlife resources and associated habitats serve as a bellwether for ecosystem health. As coastal and shoreline areas fall under increasing pressure, cumulative impacts mount and our natural resources become diminished. The challenges and resulting opportunities are great. Comprising less than 25% of America’s land area, coastal counties are home to more than 50% of our total population—a share projected to swell to 75% by 2010. Only 50% of the Nation’s wetlands remain; more than 70% of the Nation’s riparian habitats are lost or significantly degraded; and, coral reefs and submerged coastal vegetation continue to decline. Further, less than 2% of the Nation’s rivers remain free flowing. Consequences of habitat loss include decreases in fish and wildlife populations and many other natural, social, and economic impacts that have the potential to decrease quality of life. The Coastal Program seeks to address these challenges proactively by partnering with a wide range of stakeholders while holding true to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) mission: “working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.” At the heart of the Service’s mission are the conservation and management of federal trust resource species: migratory birds, threatened and endangered species, inter-jurisdictional fish, certain marine mammals, and species of international concern. As we work under an array of statutory authorities and resource management programs, the Coastal Program serves as a bridge to owners and managers of federal and non-federal lands where partnerships are developed to benefit fish and wildlife and associated habitats directly. With a focus on voluntary, cooperative conservation, the Coastal Program works under the premise that fish and wildlife conservation represents a shared responsibility across all lines of interest and society. To that end, we engage willing partners to conserve and protect valuable fish and wildlife habitat. We provide funding, technical assistance, and planning tools needed to make on-the-ground conservation affordable, feasible,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phase I Avian Risk Assessment
    PHASE I AVIAN RISK ASSESSMENT Garden Peninsula Wind Energy Project Delta County, Michigan Report Prepared for: Heritage Sustainable Energy October 2007 Report Prepared by: Paul Kerlinger, Ph.D. John Guarnaccia Curry & Kerlinger, L.L.C. P.O. Box 453 Cape May Point, NJ 08212 (609) 884-2842, fax 884-4569 [email protected] [email protected] Garden Peninsula Wind Energy Project, Delta County, MI Phase I Avian Risk Assessment Garden Peninsula Wind Energy Project Delta County, Michigan Executive Summary Heritage Sustainable Energy is proposing a utility-scale wind-power project of moderate size for the Garden Peninsula on the Upper Peninsula of Michigan in Delta County. This peninsula separates northern Lake Michigan from Big Bay de Noc. The number of wind turbines is as yet undetermined, but a leasehold map provided to Curry & Kerlinger indicates that turbines would be constructed on private lands (i.e., not in the Lake Superior State Forest) in mainly agricultural areas on the western side of the peninsula, and possibly on Little Summer Island. For the purpose of analysis, we are assuming wind turbines with a nameplate capacity of 2.0 MW. The turbine towers would likely be about 78.0 meters (256 feet) tall and have rotors of about 39.0 m (128 feet) long. With the rotor tip in the 12 o’clock position, the wind turbines would reach a maximum height of about 118.0 m (387 feet) above ground level (AGL). When in the 6 o’clock position, rotor tips would be about 38.0 m (125 feet) AGL. However, larger turbines with nameplate capacities (up to 2.5 MW and more) reaching to 152.5 m (500 feet) are may be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewers Association Brewery Members As of June 14, 2012
    Brewers Association Brewery Members as of June 14, 2012 (512) Brewing Co - Austin, TX 7 Seas Brewing Co - Gig Harbor, WA 10 Barrel Brewing Co - Bend, OR 75th Street Brewery - Kansas City, MO 12 String Brewing Co - Spokane, WA A1A Ale Works - St Augustine, FL 16 Mile Brewing Co - Georgetown, DE Aardwolf Pub and Brewery - Ponte Vedra, FL 1974 Brewing Company - Pottstown, PA Abandon Brewing - Victor, NY 21st Amendment Brewery Cafe - San Francisco, CA Abbey Beverage Co, LLC / Monastery of Christ In the Desert - Santa Fe, NM 23rd Street Brewery - Lawrence, KS Abbey Ridge - Alto Pass, IL 2nd Shift Brewing Co - New Haven, MO Abita Brewing Co - Abita Springs, LA 3 Guys and A Beer'd Brewing Co - Carbondale, PA AC Golden Brewing Company - Golden, CO 3 Sheeps Brewing Co - Sheboygan, WI Actual Brewing Company, LLC - Columbus, OH 3 Stars Brewing Co - Washington, DC Adelbert's Brewery LLC - Austin, TX 303 Brewing Company - Denver, CO Adirondack Pub and Brewery - Lake George, NY 4 Hands Brewing Co - Saint Louis, MO Adroit Theory Brewing Company - Sterling, VA 4 Paws Brewing - Chicago, IL Against the Grain Brewery - Louisville, KY 40 Arpent - New Orleans, LA Aiken Brewing Co - Aiken, SC 406 Brewing Company - Bozeman, MT Alameda Brewing Co - Portland, OR 49th State Brewing Co - Denali National Park, AK Alamo Beer Co - San Antonio, TX 4th Street Brewing Co - Gresham, OR Alaskan Brewing Co. - Juneau, AK 5 Boroughs Brewery - New York, NY Alchemist Cannery - Waterbury, VT 5 Rabbit Cerveceria Inc - Chicago, IL Ale Asylum - Madison, WI 515 Brewing Co - Clive,
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's Great Black Swamp
    Ohio’s Great Black Swamp The Great Black Swamp was a vast wetland that dominated the Lake Erie lowland from northwest Ohio into northeastern The Great Black Swamp region Indiana. The system of marshy, woody habitat was created by Ice (photograph courtesy of the Allen County Historical Age glacial advances and retreats. Although Native Americans set Society and The Lima News) up villages on the periphery of the swamp, they ventured only occasionally across its sandy ridges. The swamp was a barrier to Words to Know: most people for centuries, and was studied by almost no one habitat periphery until it was drained in the late 19th century. cholera tributary In June of 1812, U.S. troops led by General William Hull crossed glacial necessity the swamp in 20 days. It took them eight days to get from Urbana implementation buffer to Fort McArthur, near Kenton. They bogged down 16 miles north of Fort McArthur, erected Fort Necessity , then advanced 14 miles to For Discussion: build Fort Findlay. They made it to the Maumee River on June 30. 1. For centuries, no one lived in The U.S. government took years to build the Maumee-Western the Great Black Swamp. What do Reserve Road, now State Route 20, through the swamp. The job, you suppose made people finally begun in 1808, was finished in 1820. By 1835, the road had wish to live there? become an impassable quagmire, and people were traveling 2. The Great Black Swamp served along the roadway’s side ditches instead. Short-lived “corduroy” as a sponge that collected debris roads were made from logs hewn from the swamp’s massive and dirt flowing toward Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Summer 2009 Program Guide
    OPA ETR RK M S Program Guide JULY | AUGUST | SEPTEMBER 2009 Spending Summer Close To Home? We Have Dozens Of Ways To Spend It Wisely. | 1 | Check out our NEW! programs 419-407-9700 | METROPARKSPROGRAMS.COM Contents 3 Summer Camps 4 About Metroparks 5 Open for the Season 6 Special Events 7 Free Sunday Sampler Metrobarks, page 6 8 Nature Programs 11 Nature Programs for Kids 14 Nature Photography Programs 17 History Programs 20 History Programs for Kids 18 Year of the Trail Nature For Kids 22 Wildwood Manor House Programs page 11 | 2 | 22 Toledo Botanical Garden Programs 23 Nature’s Nursery Programs 23 Volunteer Programs 25 Volunteer Opportunities 25 Friends Groups 27 Members Programs 28 NEW! Program Index Helping Hands, page 23 33 Contacts 34 Directory Park Hours Reservations Phone reservations: 419-407-9700 Online reservations: MetroparksPrograms.com Program hotline/Cancellations: 419-407-9771 Facility Rentals, page 28 Reservation Form, page 31 Volunteer Services 419-407-9703 PROGRAMS LISTED BY DATE AT METROPARKSPROGRAMS.COM Summer Camps Memories Are Made At Metroparks Summer Camps Nature Camp (Ages 7 to 12) NEW! Kids Nature Photo Camp Nature Camp is a week of nature discovery Kids will have an excellent adventure in and exploration for kids with fun activi- exploring nature and capturing those wild ties, games, living history and stewardship moments with cameras. A limited number projects. Each day has a different focus. It’s of cameras are available to borrow during a great educational experience for children camp. Hosted at the National Center for who enjoy nature, history and the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands
    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the 2019 Edition of the GOBA Digest! the Intent of This
    elcome to the 2019 edition of the GOBA Digest! The intent of this publication is to highlight historical, unusual, and otherwise interesting places, people, and things as you ride the Great WOhio Bicycle Adventure. Before diving in, a quick history of the digest itself: In 1991, Tom Barlow, the original Event Director had included a bit of information about the days’ routes along the map margins. An “anonymous” commenter said they enjoyed the information but craved more. Tom recognized the commenter’s handwriting as belonging to Julie Schmitt and he recruited her to do to first “Global GOBA”. Julie Schmitt has been the author of the digest ever since then. Julie says, “Since the Ohio Department of Development had given seed money to help jump start GOBA and the goal was to feature the smaller communities in Ohio, it was only natural to try a get a bit more intimate with the landscape. As a new rider, and an Ohio skeptic (I loved Wild, Wonderful West Virginia with its white water rivers and stunning mountains), GOBA really helped me foster a love for Ohio and I feel like I am now one of its most fierce champions.” Julie continued: “I have seen the decline in Ohio’s small towns from lack of employment, and changing farming practices. Gone are the smaller farms and along with that, the fence rows that fos- tered a number of plant and animal species, broke up the landscape and may have helped to moder- ate daily temperatures. Now we have to frequently seek shelter on GOBA from heavy rains and strong winds.” The Digest, like the tradition of GOBA itself, is one that is cherished by all riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Commission Clean Ohio Fund - Green Space Conservation Program Acreage Report
    State of Ohio Public Works Commission Clean Ohio Fund - Green Space Conservation Program Acreage Report County Applicant Project Name ProjID Grant Acquired Description Adams The Nature Conservancy Buzzardroost Rock and Cave Hollow Preserve COCAB 337,050216 Acres This project consists of acquisition of 216 acres of land in Adams County to expand the Buzzardrock Addition Preserve. The preserve is named for the turkey and black vultures that frequent the 300-foot rock and associated cliffs of the property. Adams The Nature Conservancy Additions To Edge of Appalachia Preserve SystemCODAC 725,062383 Acres This project consists of acquisition of 383 acres to expand the Abner Hollow, Cave Hollow, Lynx Prairie, and Wilderness preserves in Adams County. The project serves to protect and increase habitat for threatened and endangered species, preserves streamside forests, connects protected natural areas, provides aesthetic preservation benefits, facilitates good management for safe hunting, and enhances economic development related to recreation and ecotourism. Adams The Nature Conservancy Sunshine Corridor and Adjacent TractsCOEAB 741,675654 Acres This project consists of the fee simple acquisition of 654 acres at five locations in Adams County. This project protects habitat, preserves headwater streams and streamside forest, connects natural areas, and facilitates outdoor education. Adams The Nature Conservancy Edge of Appalachia and Strait Creek Preserve COFAA 1,251,853812 Acres This project consists of the fee simple acquisition of 812 acres at 10 locations in Adams County. The Additions project increases and protects habitat, preserves headwater streams and streamside forest, and connects natural areas. Adams The Nature Conservancy Edge of Appalachia Sunshine Corridor Additions - COFAB 699,191514 Acres This project consists of fee simple acquisition of about 514 acres of land at 4 locations in Adams 2011 County.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Door Peninsula and Its Geomorphology
    WISCONSIN'S DOOR PENINSULA AND ITS GEOMORPHOLOGY Howard De II er AGS Collection, UW-Mllwaukee and Paul Stoelting University of Wisconsin-La Crosse The Door Peninsula of Wisconsin is one of the premier tourist regions of the American r~iddle West. According to a recent geography of Wisconsin (Vogeler et al 1986,8) , the region is best known for its picturesque sea­ scape, New England-style architecture, fish boils, and cherry orchards. Among geomorphologists, however, the region is known for the great variety of land­ form types and for the complex and changing geomorphological processes which have operated in the peninsula. Towering bluffs, sand dunes, lake terraces, abandoned beach ridges, swampy lowlands, and drumlin fields are only some of the many types of landforms to be found in the peninsula. Indeed, the region can be viewed as a unique geomorphological laboratory and an excellent example for classroom study. In this short paper an attempt is made to describe and analyze some of the more prominent landform features of the peninsula and the processes which have influenced their formation. LOCATION AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The Door Peninsula, located In northeastern Wisconsin. is part of the Eastern Ridges and Lowlands province of the state. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction into Lake Michigan to separate Green Bay on the west from the main body of Lake Michigan on the east. The peninsula is approximately 64 miles long and about 26 miles wide on its southern end, between the mouth of the Fox River and the city of Kewaunee on Lake Michigan (Map I).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Annual Report
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT OUR MISSION ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 Black Swamp Conservancy is a land trust dedicated As a nonprofit organization, Black Swamp to protecting natural areas and family farms, Conservancy relies on the support of now and for future generations, through land landowners, donors, and partnerships with other conservation agreements. We do this to preserve the conservation organizations. We strive to be a rural heritage, unique natural habitats, and lakes wise investment for our supporters, whether they and streams of northwest Ohio. are giving us their land, time, or money. By protecting our valuable land and water resources, we hope to support healthier communities with strong, sustainable economies including agriculture and ecotourism. ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2019 We are making a difference in the future of northwest Our efforts to restore natural habitats continue on. Ohio. With your help, Black Swamp Conservancy is This report highlights the Carter Farm project, but creating new public preserves throughout the region, re- more work has also been accomplished at Forrest building natural habitats that had been lost, and helping Woods … and there are other restoration projects now beginning farmers access land on which to produce food in the works. in ecologically sensitive ways. The Conservancy’s Food and Farm Initiative is well This year The Conservancy purchased two new nature underway, with the first farmer on-the-ground and a preserves; one along Lake Erie and the other all the way search for more land to help beginning farmers get upstream in its headwaters. The Kraft-Heinz Company their start next growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Region: a Second Iteration
    Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Region: A Second Iteration (Revised September 2000) Prepared by The Nature Conservancy Great Lakes Program 8 South Michigan Avenue Suite 2301 Chicago, IL 60603 (312) 759-8017 Copyright 2000 Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Toward A New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes In 1996, The Nature Conservancy’s Great Lakes Program launched a collaborative initiative to identify high priority biodiversity conservation sites in the Great Lakes region. This initiative was precipitated by the Conservancy broadening its focus beyond just rare and endangered species and natural communities. The Conservancy recognized that to effectively protect the full range of biodiversity, conservation efforts must include those species and natural communities that are more common and representative as well as those that are declining or vulnerable. Taking an Ecoregional Perspective To address this shift in focus, the Conservancy oriented its work based on ecoregions—large areas defined by the influences of shared climate and geology, the main factors that determine the broad-scale distribution of plants and animals.1 The Great Lakes ecoregion—which includes major portions of Canada and the United States—is one of 64 ecologically distinct regions of the continental United States. For each of these ecoregions, the Conservancy is developing a detailed plan that identifies the places that need to be protected to conserve native biodiversity for the long term. At many of these places, local communities, private landowners and an array of public and private entities are already leading important conservation efforts. The Great Lakes ecoregional planning initiative is a systematic approach that identifies all native species, natural communities and aquatic systems characteristic of the Great Lakes region and then determines how many of and where these elements of biodiversity need to be protected over the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • North End of Lake Michigan, Including Green Bay NOAA Chart 14902
    BookletChart™ North End of Lake Michigan, Including Green Bay NOAA Chart 14902 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Published by the small-craft harbor at Petoskey is protected on the W by a breakwater extending N from shore and marked on the outer end by a light. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration breakwater should not be passed close aboard due to large riprap National Ocean Service stones along the sides, and end. Office of Coast Survey Beaver Island, the principal island in the group W of Grays Reef Passage, is 13 miles long N and S with a maximum width of 6.5 miles. The wooded www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov island is bluff on the W side and lower on the E side. Shoals extend 888-990-NOAA about 0.5 to 1 mile offshore around the island, except in Sandy Bay, about mid-length of the E side, where deep water is within 0.2 mile of What are Nautical Charts? shore. Good Harbor Bay, between Carp River Point and Pyramid Point 7.7 Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show miles WSW, has deep water close to shore and affords protection in all water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much but N to NE winds. However, in the NE part of the bay, an extensive more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and rocky ledge with depths of 2 to 18 feet is 1 to 3 miles offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Wayne: the History and Archaeology of an Early
    ANTHONY WAYNE: THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF AN EARLY GREAT LAKES STEAMBOAT A Thesis by BRADLEY ALAN KRUEGER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2012 Major Subject: Anthropology Anthony Wayne: The History and Archaeology of an Early Great Lakes Steamboat Copyright 2012 Bradley Alan Krueger ANTHONY WAYNE: THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF AN EARLY GREAT LAKES STEAMBOAT A Thesis by BRADLEY ALAN KRUGEER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Kevin J. Crisman Committee Members, Felipe Luis Vieira De Castro Charles E. Brooks Head of Department, Cynthia Werner May 2012 Major Subject: Anthropology iii ABSTRACT Anthony Wayne: The History and Archaeology of an Early Great Lakes Steamboat. (May 2012) Bradley Alan Krueger, B.A., University of Michigan Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kevin J. Crisman The Great Lakes side-wheel steamboat Anthony Wayne was built in 1837 at Perrysburg, OH and participated in lakes shipping during a time when such vessels were experiencing their heyday. Designed as a passenger and cargo carrier, the steamer spent 13 years transporting goods and people throughout the Upper Lakes until succumbing to a boiler explosion while headed to Buffalo on 28 April 1850. The remains of Anthony Wayne were discovered in 2006 and two years later a collaborative project was begun for the purposes of documenting and assessing the present day condition of the wreck.
    [Show full text]