DOCSLIB.ORG

Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report (1996), Lusaka, Zambia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report (1996), Lusaka, Zambia CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW ON ZAMBIA 1.1. Introduction Zambia is a landlocked sub-Saharan country sharing boundaries with Malawi, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia, Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania. The country covers a land area of 752,612 square kilometers. It lies between 8 and 18 degrees South latitudes and longitudes 22 and 34 degrees East. About 58 percent of Zambia’s total land area of 39 million hectares is classified as having medium to high potential for agricultural production, but less than half of potential arable land is cultivated. The country is prone to drought due to erratic rainfall, as its abundant water resources remain largely untapped. Zambia has some of the largest copper and cobalt deposits in the world. 1.2. Land and the People Zambia’s population was first comprehensively recorded at 5.7 million in 1980. It increased to 7.8 million and 9.9 million in 1990 and 2000, respectively. The population has over the years remained young, with about 45 percent of the population below 15 years (CSO, 2000). The country’s average population density is 13 persons per square kilometer, while Lusaka Province (hosting the capital city of Lusaka) has the highest average of 64 persons per sq km. Although Zambia is endowed with many languages, derived from 73 ethnic groups, there are seven major languages that are used besides English for official purposes (such as broadcasting and dissemination of information). These are Bemba, Kaonde, Lozi, Lunda, Luvale, Nyanja and Tonga. 1.3. Politics and Administration Politically, Zambia has undergone phases of both multi-partism and one party rule. The country, which is a former British colony, gained its independence in 1964. Administratively, the country is divided into nine provinces namely Central, Copperbelt, Eastern, Luapula, Lusaka, Northern, North-Western, Southern and Western. These provinces are further divided into 72 districts. 1.4. Developments in the Zambian Economy Zambia’s economic policy regimes can be divided into four main periods. Free market policies (1964-1972): During this period, the Government pursued liberal economic and political policies, with little or no state controls, while placing focus on provision of infrastructure and services. High and rising copper export earnings boosted the economy’s capital stock. State Control defined the second period (1973-1984): By the mid-1970s Zambia was largely a public sector- led economy with excessive controls, parastatal monopolies, and a pro-urban, anti-agricultural bias. A large number of parastatals were established in mining, telecommunications, energy, finance, and agro-business. The Government actively supported industrialization by maintaining an overvalued exchange rate to promote imports of capital equipment and intermediate goods and by protecting local producers with high tariffs on finished goods. In 1974-1975 the Government began subsidizing maize, a practice that continued until the early 1990’s, with increasingly negative effects on the fiscal balance. The Government dramatically increased it’s foreign borrowing to compensate for the steep decline in the international purchasing power of copper in 1975. Community Developmental Issues 1 Economic transition (1985-1990): This period was characterized by the introduction of unsustained stabilization and structural adjustment policies. Significant socio-economic changes were undertaken during the period 1985-1988. In May 1987, the Government abandoned earlier agreements with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank and reimposed numerous controls, after political discontent resulted in food riots on the copperbelt province. In June 1989 the Government decontrolled all consumer goods prices except the price of Maize. Stabilization and structural adjustment (1991-2002): During this period the Government actively pursued policies that facilitate private sector growth, including price, trade, exchange and interest rate policies; financial sector liberalization; and more responsible fiscal and monetary policies. Agricultural output and input markets were liberalized, and significant privatization and other institutional reforms were undertaken. Despite substantial aid flows, Zambia’s economic performance has continued to decline, as indicated by various economic indicators. The average annual growth rate of GDP in the period 1970 to 1975 was 2.6 percent. It reduced to –0.9 percent in the period 1975 to 1990 and reduced further to –0.3 percent between 1990 and 1999. GNP per capita has not shown any improvement. Between the periods 1970 to 1975, 1975 to 1990 and 1991 to 1999, per capita GDP declined by –0.8, -3.1 and –7.2 per cent respectively (Economic report 2000). Table 1.1: Selected Macro-economic Indicators 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 GDP at current prices (K’ Billion) 2,240.1 3,005.1 3,950.2 5,140.2 6,027.9 7,477.7 10,071.9 13,132.7 16,260.4 GDP at constant 1994 prices (K’ Billion) 2,240.1 2,176.9 2,404.9 2,360.2 2,412.7 2,499.0 2,499.0 2,621.3 2,707.9 Per capita GDP at current prices (K’000) 256 330 418 526 597 733 978 1,245 1,505 Per capita GDP at constant 1994 prices 256 239 246 246 233 236 242 248 251 (K’000) GDP growth rate (1994=100) -2.8 6.9 3.3 -1.9 2.2 3.6 4.9 3.3 Percentage contribution to GDP (1994=100) Agriculture 13.5 18.5 17.2 15.8 16.3 17.5 17.2 16.0 15.2 Mining 16.5 12.4 12.0 11.8 9.0 6.6 6.4 7.0 7.9 Manufacturing 9.8 10.0 9.9 10.1 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.4 10.7 Electricity 3.2 3.3 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.9 Construction 5.0 4.9 4.1 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.3 6.0 Wholesale and Retail Trade 14.8 13.6 17.0 17.2 18.1 18.5 18.3 18.4 18.7 Hotels, Bars and Restaurants 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.3 Transport and Communication 6.0 5.7 5.8 5.6 6.2 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.1 Financial Institutions and Insurance 8.2 10.0 8.6 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.2 7.8 7.9 Real Estate and Business Services 5.0 5.3 6.1 6.6 7.6 8.4 9.5 9.4 9.5 Community Social and Personal services 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.6 7.6 8.0 7.7 7.8 7.7 Less FISIM -4.7 -5.8 -4.9 -4.8 -4.9 -4.9 -4.9 -4.8 -4.7 Gross Value Added 87.1 88.0 88.1 88.1 88.5 89.3 89.1 88.9 90.0 Taxes on Products 12.9 12.0 11.9 11.9 11.5 10.7 10.9 11.1 10.0 GDP at Market prices 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Exchange rate (Kwacha /$US) 687.2 878.3 1,213.1 1,321.3 1,765.9 2,417.3 3,170.8 3,581.1 4,384.8 Inflation (%) 38.3 46.0 35.2 18.6 30.6 20.6 30.1 18.7 26.7 Exports of Goods and services (K’ Billion) 1994=100 806.5 673.5 718.5 856.4 905.2 1,146.5 1,546.8 2,033.6 2,488.0 Imports of Goods and services (K’ Billion) 1994=100 824.9 1,149.0 1,462.5 1,603.7 1,860.5 2,498.6 3,264.9 4,127.2 4,398.7 Source: Central Statistical Office 1.5. Developments in the Social Sectors The poor performance of the Zambian economy adversely affected the key social sectors namely the health and education sectors. These sectors have for sometime now heavily depended on Government funding. However, Government has been finding it difficult to provide adequate social services due to limited resources available. As a result, the provision of both the health and education services has not been sufficient to reach all the population sub-groups particularly the poor. Community Developmental Issues 2 By 1998, net primary school attendance rate was below 70 percent. By 2001, Net school enrolment ratios for primary and secondary schools were at about 76 and 11 percent, respectively. The incidence of malaria per 1000 population remained high at 394 by 2001. By 2000, under-five mortality rate was still high at 162 deaths per 1000 children. Infant mortality rates remained equally high at 110 per 1000 infants by 2000. The HIV/AIDS pandemic continued to ravage the Zambian society. HIV/AIDs prevalence rate was at 16 percent for the population aged 15 to 49 years old by 2002. Generally socio-economic conditions of the majority of the people had deteriorated so much that the Government and it’s cooperating partners decided to put together a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper in 2001. Community Developmental Issues 3 CHAPTER 2 SURVEY BACKGROUND AND SAMPLE DESIGN METHODOLOGY 2.1. Survey Background The Living Conditions Monitoring Surveys (LCMS) evolved from the Social Dimensions of Adjustment Priority surveys conducted in 1991 (PSI) and 1993 (PSII), by the Central Statistical Office. So far, four Living Conditions Monitoring Surveys have been conducted. These are: - (i) The Living Conditions Monitoring Survey I of 1996 (ii) The Living Conditions Monitoring Survey II of 1998 (iii) The Living Conditions Monitoring Survey III of 2002/2003 and (iv) The Living Conditions Monitoring Survey IV of 2004 2.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Report Last Updated: 9 Dec 2020
    ZAMBIA Situation Report Last updated: 9 Dec 2020 HIGHLIGHTS (9 Dec 2020) The Ministry of Health has confirmed 17,916 COVID- 19 cases and 364 deaths as of 7 December. The number of districts reporting COVID-19 infections had increased from 68 in September to 96, as of 30 November. Education partners report that 16 per cent of nearly 39,000 learners in Eastern and Southern provinces have dropped a reading level during COVID-19 school closures.. The food security situation remains of major concern, Community sensitization on COVID-19 in Chawama Market amid a infestation of the African Migratory Locusts in in Lusaka. Photo: ©UNICEF/Mulikita 14 districts across Central, Southern and Western provinces. Nearly 2 million people are facing severe food insecurity between October 2020 and March 2021, despite increased crop production in most areas. KEY FIGURES FUNDING CONTACTS Laura Hastings 10.1M 6.2M $132.9M $66.2M Humanitarian Affairs Officer, Zambia people in need people targeted requested (May-Oct received [email protected] 2020) Guiomar Pau Sole 27 Head of Communications & Information partners operational 51.7% Management, Regional Office for funded Southern & Eastern Africa [email protected] INTERACTIVE (29 Oct 2020) Emergency Appeal Financial Tracking https://reports.unocha.org/en/country/zambia/ Page 1 of 15 Downloaded: 9 Dec 2020 ZAMBIA Situation Report Last updated: 9 Dec 2020 View this interactive graphic: https://bit.ly/ZambiaAppealFunding BACKGROUND (9 Dec 2020) Situation Overview Since the first case of COVID-19 on 18 March 2020, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed over 17,916 cases with 364 deaths (case fatality rate of 2 per cent) as of 7 December 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia
    7 Agrarian changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia Davison J Gumbo, Kondwani Y Mumba, Moka M Kaliwile, Kaala B Moombe and Tiza I Mfuni Summary Over the past decade issues pertaining to land sharing/land sparing have gained some space in the debate on the study of land-use strategies and their associated impacts at landscape level. State and non-state actors have, through their interests and actions, triggered changes at the landscape level and this report is a synthesis of some of the main findings and contributions of a scoping study carried out in Zambia as part of CIFOR’s Agrarian Change Project. It focuses on findings in three villages located in the Nyimba District. The villages are located on a high (Chipembe) to low (Muzenje) agricultural land-use gradient. Nyimba District, which is located in the country’s agriculturally productive Eastern Province, was selected through a two-stage process, which also considered another district, Mpika, located in Zambia’s Muchinga Province. The aim was to find a landscape in Zambia that would provide much needed insights into how globally conceived land-use strategies (e.g. land-sharing/land-sparing trajectories) manifest locally, and how they interact with other change processes once they are embedded in local histories, culture, and political and market dynamics. Nyimba District, with its history of concentrated and rigorous policy support in terms of agricultural intensification over different epochs, presents Zambian smallholder farmers as victims and benefactors of policy pronouncements. This chapter shows Agrarian changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia • 235 the impact of such policies on the use of forests and other lands, with agriculture at the epicenter.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Zambia Partners in Development Book
    PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT July 2018 Partners in Zambia’s Development Handbook July 2018 United States Agency for International Development Embassy of the United States of America Subdivision 694 / Stand 100 Ibex Hill Road P.O. Box 320373 Lusaka, Zambia 10101 Cover Photo: As part of a private -sector and youth-engagement outreach partnership, media entrepreneur and UNAIDS Ambassador Lulu Haangala Wood (l), musician and entrepreneur Pompi (c), and Film and TV producer Yoweli Chungu (r) lend their voices to help draw attention to USAID development programs. (Photo Credit: Chando Mapoma / USAID Zambia) Our Mission On behalf of the American People, we promote and demonstrate democratic values abroad, and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world. In support of America's foreign policy, the U.S. Agency for International Development leads the U.S. Government's international development and disaster assistance through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, strengthen democratic governance, and help people emerge from humanitarian crises and progress beyond assistance. Our Interagency Initiatives USAID/Zambia Partners In Development 1 The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is the lead U.S. Government agency that works to end extreme global poverty and enable resilient, democratic societies to realize their potential. Currently active in over 100 countries worldwide, USAID was born out of a spirit of progress and innovation, reflecting American values and character, motivated by a fundamental belief in helping others. USAID provides development and humanitarian assistance in Africa, Asia and the Near East, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Europe. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., USAID retains field missions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Health Sector Public Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Survey
    Public Disclosure Authorized Zambia Health Sector Public Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Survey Public Disclosure Authorized Collins Chansa Thulani Matsebula Moritz Piatti Dale Mudenda Chitalu Miriam Chama-Chiliba Bona Chitah Oliver Kaonga Chris Mphuka Public Disclosure Authorized April 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 19 18 17 16 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Rp124 Cover.Pmd
    LTC Research Paper Land Tenure, Land Markets, and Instituional Transformation in Zambia edited by Michael Roth with the assistance of Steven G. Smith University of Wisconsin-Madison 175 Science Hall 550 North Park Street Madison, WI 53706 http://www.ies.wisc.edu/ltc/ Research Paper LTC Research Paper 124, U.S. ISSN 0084-0815 originally published in October 1995 LAND TENURE, LAND MARKETS, AND INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN ZAMBIA edited by Michael Roth with the assistance of Steven G. Smith All views, interpretations, recommendations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting or cooperating organizations. Andy recommendations or suggestions herein doe not represent the official position of the Government of Zambia. LTC Research Paper 124 Prepared for the Land Tenure Center University of Wisconsin-Madison October 1995 Copyright ® 1995 by the authors. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Lists of Tables and Figures vii List of Acronyms x Preface xi Chapter 1: Legal Framework and Administration of Land Policy in Zambia 1 I. Introduction 1 A. Issues 1 B. Outline of report 2 II. Colonial policy and settlement 4 III. Agrarian structure 5 IV. Arable land and crop expansion 7 V. Land tenure 14 A. Tenure on State Lands 15 B. Reserve and Trust Land administration 18 C. Urban, housing, and improvement areas 22 D. Agencies responsible for land policy 23 E. Subdivisions 24 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL ASSESSMENT SURVEY of LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT at GRADE 2 Results for Early Grade Reading and Mathematics in Zambia
    NATIONAL ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AT GRADE 2 Results for Early Grade Reading and Mathematics in Zambia Prepared by RTI International March 2015 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AT GRADE 2 Results for Early Grade Reading and Mathematics in Zambia Prepared for Teresiah Wambui Gathenya (PhD), Education Advisor Education Office, United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Zambia U.S. Embassy Subdivision 694 / Stand 100 P.O. Box 32481 Kabulonga District, Ibex Hill Road Lusaka, District Zambia Prepared by Aarnout Brombacher, Jennae Bulat, Simon King, Emily Kochetkova, and Lee Nordstrum RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Post Office Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge partnership support from the British Department for International Development (DFID); the United States Agency for International Development (USAID); the Government of the Republic of Zambia, through its Ministry of Education, Science, Vocational Training and Early Education (MESVTEE); and the Examinations Council of Zambia. Many departments and staff from the Ministry of Education and the Examinations Council of Zambia also made important contributions to the development and implementation of this study and helped ensure that the instruments and methodologies were appropriately aligned to the Zambia context. Most importantly, this work could not have succeeded without the cooperation and contributions of the District Education Officers, head teachers, teachers, pupils, and communities included in the study who, for obvious reasons, must remain anonymous.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Ranching: a Sustainable Land Use Option and Economic Incentive for Biodiversity Conservation in Zambia
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 571-581 Published Online June 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.49047 Game Ranching: A Sustainable Land Use Option and Economic Incentive for Biodiversity Conservation in Zambia Chansa Chomba1*, Chimbola Obias2, Vincent Nyirenda3 1School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Disaster Management Training Centre, Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia 3School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia Email: *[email protected], *[email protected], *[email protected] Received 23 April 2014; revised 23 May 2014; accepted 2 June 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The ten provinces of Zambia were surveyed to determine number and size of game ranches si- tuated in these areas up to the end of 2012/early 2013. Three classes of game ranches were de- veloped as; 1) ≥500 hectares as game ranch proper, 2) ≥50 - <500 hectares as game farm, and 3) <50 hectares as ornamental. A total of 200 game ranches keeping large mammals from the size of common duiker to eland were recorded with a growth rate of 6 per year for the period 1980-2012. The largest number was ornamental 98 (49%); large game ranches were 75 (38%) and the least was game farms 27 (14%). Thirty seven species of large mammals were recorded, of which, 15 were the most abundant with impala topping the list with 21,000 individuals (34%).
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Project
    STRENGTHENING EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE – UP (STEP-UP) ZAMBIA PROJECT QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FY 2014 Q3: APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2014 Contract No. AID-611-C-12-00001 JULY 31, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo: A Grade One learner demonstrates her literacy skills in front of provincial and district educational officers at the provincial launch of the Let’s Read Zambia campaign in Southern Province. Though she is a Grade One student, she is able to read from a Grade Two textbook. STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 A. INTEGRATE AND STRENGTHEN SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED DECISION-MAKING (TASK 1) 6 B. PROMOTE EQUITY AS A CENTRAL THEME IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION (TASK 2) 9 C. INSTITUTIONALIZE THE MESVTEE’S MANAGEMENT OF HIV AND AIDS WORKPLACE POLICIES (TASK 3) 9 D. STRENGTHEN DECENTRALIZATION FOR IMPROVED LEARNER PERFORMANCE (TASK 4) 15 E. ENGAGE ZAMBIAN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MESVTEE POLICY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS (TASK 5) 24 F. MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION 28 III. GOALS FOR NEXT QUARTER 30 ANNEX A: SUCCESS STORY 32 ANNEX B: STATUS OF M&E INDICATORS 35 ANNEX C: ACTIVE DATA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES 39 STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT iii
    [Show full text]
  • Central Province General Profile Infographic
    ADAPTED BY APRIL 2018 Research and Analysis Department - Designed by Communications ©2018 Policy Monitoring and Research Centre (PMRC) CENTRAL PROVINCE [email protected] www.pmrczambia.com GENERAL PROFILE INFOGRAPHIC SUBSCRIBE NOW: [email protected] GENERAL PROFILE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATION PROFILE MAJOR NATURAL RESOURCES LOCATION CONSTITUENCY AGRICULTURE The Province has . Each constituency is represented by (1) elected member Central Province consists of 9.4 million hectares of land, Central province lies at the heart of Zambia. The province shares borders with 16 Constituencies of parliament (MP). CENTRAL about 40% of which is suitable for crop production and the Democratic Republic of Congo and eight other provinces of Zambia with an about 42% for livestock grazing exception of Northern. The Province occupies a total surface area of 108,460km and 16 CONSTITUENCIES PROVINCE is divided into twelve districts namely; Chibombo, Itezhi-tezhi, Kapiri, Shibuyunji FOREST Mposhi, Chitambo, Lunano, Mkushi, Mumbwa, Ngabwe, Chisamba and Serenje with The Province has a total number of 38 forest reserves Kabwe being the provincial capital. The province as at 2010 had a population of LOCAL GOVERNMENT predominantly covered by the Miombo woodland with an 1,332,396 with a gender ratio of 49% male and 51% female. estimated woody plant flora of about 650 species. The Province has (1) Municipality and 12 District Councils. The Mayor/ Council Chairpersons are the political heads of the local government. WILD LIFE 12 DISTRICT COUNCILS The wilderness is characterized by the vastness of unexploited areas, MALE FEMALE such as the Kafue National Park, Itezhi-tezhi dam, the Kafue River and WARDS the wetlands or Kafue flood plains.
    [Show full text]
  • In Zambia a Review of the Biggest REDD+ Project in Africa Financed by the Italian Oil and Gas Company ENI the Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia
    The Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia A review of the biggest REDD+ project in Africa financed by the Italian oil and gas company ENI The Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia A review of the biggest REDD+ project in Africa financed by the Italian oil and gas company ENI Author: Kelvin Mulungu Commissioned by: Greenpeace Italy May 2021 INDEX 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Zambia and the Luangwa Community 4 1.2 Introduction to the review of Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) 5 1.3 Mechanisms of the Luangwa Community Forests Project (LCFP) 7 2. Partners and Players in the LCFPs 11 3. Methodology 13 4. General Issue: Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) 14 5. ENI’s Promise of Carbon Offsets in the LCFP 17 6. Issues with the LCFP 23 6.1 Choice of the reference area 23 6.2 Projected deforestation 25 6.2.1 Reported baseline deforestation rate 26 6.2.2 Choice of the baseline approach 27 6.2.3 Fire risk 28 6.2.4 Forests biomass 29 6.3 Other issues with the LCFP 30 6.4 Potential community problems of the LCFP 30 7. Conclusion 33 8. Appendix I: Lusaka and Eastern Provinces of Zambia 34 9. Appendix II: Questions posed to ENI S.p.A. 36 10. References 38 3 1. INTRODUCTION This is a report commissioned by Greenpeace Italy to review the Luangwa Communi- ty Forests Project (LCFP) in Zambia with a special interest in checking for any inconsi- stencies in terms of assumptions, projected carbon credits to be generated, and any unintended effects on the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Zambia
    Adaptation to the effects of drought and climate change in Agro-ecological Regions I and II in Zambia 1 Adaptation to the effects of drought and climate change in Agro-ecological Regions I and II in Zambia Government of the Republic of Zambia United Nations Development Programme PIMS No. 3942 Adaptation to the effects of drought and climate change in Agro-ecological Regions I and II in Zambia Brief description The majority of Zambia’s farmers lack the capacity, resources and financial assistance to adapt to and overcome worsening climatic conditions. The Zambia National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) highlights that Zambian communities are vulnerable to climatic hazards (such as drought, flooding, extreme temperatures and prolonged dry spells) which precipitate widespread crop failure, negatively impact food and water security and, ultimately, affect the sustainability of rural livelihoods. Indeed, within the last 20 years, prolonged dry spells and shorter rainfall seasons have reduced maize yields to only 40% of the long-term average. Furthermore, based on a CO2 doubling scenario in these regions, estimates predict a yield reduction of approximately 66% under rain-fed conditions. The ability of the agricultural sector in Zambia to cope with increases in temperature and potential reductions in rainfall is negligible. Reasons include: i) low levels of investment ii) land degradation; iii) limited access to agricultural inputs such as fertilizer; and iv) a reduced labour force due to HIV/AIDS. To reduce the vulnerability of communities in AER I and II to climate change impacts, the project will take a two pronged-approach: i) mainstream adaptation into agricultural planning at national, district and community levels to make the case for increased investment in adaptation in the agricultural sector ii) test and evaluate the adaptation value of interventions that protect and improve agricultural incomes from the effects of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Zambia the Ministry Of
    GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA THE MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND LIVESTOCK REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (CONSULTING SERVICES) ZAMBIA CLIMATE RESILIENT LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT PROJECT Grant No. 5550155001351 Project ID No.: P-ZM-AAZ-006 Date of First Publication: 9th April, 2018 PROVISION OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LIVESTOCK PASS ON SCHEME IN NORTHERN AND MUCHINGA PROVINCES UNDER THE CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT (CRLMP). The Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock has received a Grant from the African Development Bank and African Development Fund (Acting as Executing Agencies of the Global Environment Facility) toward the cost of the Climate Resilient Livestock Management Project (CRLMP) and intends to apply part of the agreed amount for this grant to payments under the contract for provision of Consultancy Services for the Management of Livestock Pass on Scheme in Muchinga and Northern Provinces of Zambia under the Climate Change Resilient Livestock Management Project (CRLMP). The services included under this project are to increase incomes of beneficiaries especially women and youth through provision of only locally adapted livestock (goats, sheep and dairy cattle) that will ensure sustainability and multiplication of benefit. Specific objectives of the assignment includes but not limited to the following: a) Identify target communities and beneficiary livestock keeping households per project area (district); b) Procure & distribute livestock; c) Design an operational co-financing mechanism for Pass on the Gift; d) Strengthen beneficiary women and Youth group cooperatives through provision of livestock for increased household income; e) Produce extension materials in animal husbandry, disease management and improved shelter for the small livestock and dairy animals, and; f) Increase small livestock and dairy population in the project areas.
    [Show full text]