Vernacular Architecture in Michoacán. Constructive Tradition As a Response to the Natural and Cultural Surroundings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Athens Journal of Architecture - Volume 2, Issue 4 – Pages 313-326 Vernacular Architecture in Michoacán. Constructive Tradition as a Response to the Natural and Cultural Surroundings By Eugenia Maria Azevedo-Salomao Luis Alberto Torres-Garibay† Various regions of Mexico (i.e., Michoacán) have a tradition in vernacular architecture with an important wealth heritage. Constructing in this way has a notable ecological quality that has benefits for its inhabitants and the natural and cultural surroundings. This work addresses the habitability of vernacular architecture in Michoacán, making the claim that the tradition of construction methods is anchored to the collective memory and the memory of the lived space. Therefore, memories express themselves as the truth of the past based in the present. In this way, the artisans of Michoacán gathered experience from past generations and distinguished themselves by the rational use of primary materials. With direct observation, surveys to users and literature based researches, selected examples of Michoacán are analyzed. The focus is on permanencies and transformations of the vernacular architecture of the region through the observation of social habits, uses, forms, construction, natural surrounding context and significance to society. The conclusion is reached by questioning why there is a gradual loss of vernacular heritage in the region. It is observed that a necessity for its permanence is required as well as the benefits of the implementation of new techniques that contribute to the regeneration of heritage buildings is emphasized. With sustainability in mind the incorporation of vernacular materials and construction methods together with contemporary solutions is also addressed. Introduction Vernacular architecture is the result of the process of collective creation in a geographical and cultural space. It is a communal construction, a special product of the way of life of human groups. These groups make regional materials their own, with local and timeless results that persist through generations with their own techniques, systems and procedures to edify. In the state of Michoacán, Mexico, the physical and geographical diversity of the territory enabled the generation of an ample vernacular architecture and intangible heritage. This region has unique settlements because of its traditions, social organisation, customs and ways of life; always anchored to the physical conditions and local society. The diverse climate characterizes the Michoacán region. Temperatures range from temperate in the Pátzcuaro’s lake basin and Purépecha sierra to Professor, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo, Mexico. † Professor, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo, Mexico. https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.2-4-4 doi=10.30958/aja.2-4-4 Vol. 2, No. 4 Azevedo-Salomao et al.: Vernacular Architecture in Michoacán.... extremely hot in Tierra Caliente and the coastal region. These diverse environments generate sensible adaptations of the architecture to its surroundings as well as the use of the local natural resources in accordance to the region‟s climate. In the central region of the state, the Purépecha indigenous culture still survives as a culture that maintains strong Mesoamerican ancestry (Figure 1). Figure 1. Mexican Map with the Geographical Localization of Michoacán State Source: Torres Salomao Archive. The purépechas together with other indigenous groups left an impact on the local construction tradition that was adapted to the climate of the location of each settlement. This tradition focused on the search of logical and simple solutions in construction. Differences among the methods of contruction are a function of the characteristics of every region. In this sense, spatial configuration resulted from a construction tradition and way of life that has endured for a long time. The way of inhabiting and constructing imply gradual incidents in the permanence and change regarding the traditional michoacan‟s construction. They require architectonic space understanding as a product of the basic use necessities of the inhabitants with relation to day-to-day activities, aesthetics and materialization of habitable space. In addition, the natural and cultural surroundings are also involved in this equation, producing an ever-evolving cultural product that responds to individual and collective habits. In it, social and natural solutions coincide to satisfy functional and symbolic requirements born from the relationship between the user and space through the passing of time. However, the diverse settlements of the Michoacán region are also vulnerable to transformations which affect their ancestry tradition in construction and put in risk the sustainability of the habitable space. The public 314 Athens Journal of Architecture October 2016 policy is the main detractor of traditional construction and is mainly responsible for the observed transformations in these towns. With the slogan of “a better quality of life” for the indigenous population of Mexico, they have changed and devalued the indigenous values and traditional inhabitation (Figure 2). Figure 2. Food Preparation in the Santa Fe Hospital, Pátzcuaro’s Lake Basin Source: Torres Salomao Archive. This work addresses the idea that with habitable spaces, relationship between the diverse systems is materialized, in other words, the relationship between the environment and our social and cultural life. In this way, the identification and understanding of the dependencies between social, environmental and economic dimensions of habitable spaces allows the assessment of the present well-being. It also allows the assessment of sustainability for the future and preservation of natural and cultural heritage. The Concept of Habitability and Response to Natural and Cultural Surroundings To exemplify the concept of habitability, the purépecha culture is used as a case of study because of the importance they give to the relationship between form of life and the natural surroundings where they live.1 This way of being, as explained by Heidegger, is normally linked to vernacular cultures in which their settlements come from rural tradition with very small variability throughout time. These cultures are respectful of the surrounding nature and are reticent to any kind of change that disagrees with the location.2 1. Paul Levy and Marion Segaud, Antropologie de l´espace [Anthropology of space,] (Paris: Centre George Pompidou, 1983). 2. Martin Heidegger, Conferencias y artículos (incluye: Construir, habitar, pensar) [Conferences and items (includes: Build, live, think),] (Barcelona: Ediciones de Serbal, 1994). 315 Vol. 2, No. 4 Azevedo-Salomao et al.: Vernacular Architecture in Michoacán.... In the purépecha culture inhabitation is mainly outdoors. However, indoor space is also important as a complimentary element of their daily life. Their social practices determine conception and modes of space; likewise, these conceptions and modes of space also determine practice. Through the use of space, the identification of the materialized surroundings traduced into behavioral patterns and special models are achieved. Norberg-Schulz recognises these patters developed by the individuals in their interaction with the environment, and names them, „existential space‟. This existential space reflects the structure of the surrounding environment, in constant regeneration by necessity and desire.3 It is possible to state that social habit and use lasts more than the form and materiality of space. Just as a family is identified to the space that it inhabits, a community is shaped in communal spaces in a settlement. In ancient cultures, elements of nature had a special meaning and, because of this, it is normal that the imaginary of a community remains dependant to an emblematic space loaded with significance. A conclusion can be reached with the idea that habitability is the way in which spaces are adapted for their utility in accordance to the way of life of society. Inhabitation is the purpose of architecture and as such must respond to physical, biological, psychological and cultural necessities of the human being.4 In the case of the Michoacán region during the Mesoamerican period, an outdoor open life was common. Inhabitation was achieved in complete harmony with nature, and this tradition endured to the viceregal period. During this period, despite all changes generated by new ways of inhabitation, exterior space continued as the most important feature for daily activities (Figure 3). The quality of life was an integral concept of open and closed spaces in the relationships of the house. In fact, the interior space is very simple and has only essential utensils and furniture. This space is only thought as a sleeping and as a spiritual space for prayer and is sufficient to ensure these activities. All other human biological, social, recreational and artistic activities of this indigenous group are done in the open space. As stated by Carlos Chanfón, the Mesoamerican space organization mythically joined constructed spaces with natural spaces.5 3. Christian Norberg-Schulz, Existencia, Espacio y Arquitectura [Existence, Space and Architecture,] (Barcelona: Editorial Blume, 1975), 9. 4. Jose Villagran, Estructura teórica del programa arquitectónico [Theoretical structure of the architectural program,] course, (Mexico City: El Colegio Nacional, August 1963), 295. 5. Carlos Chanfon Olmos and his collaborators in the HAYUM project amply developed this topic. 316