Social Security & You: Name That Commissioner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Social Security & You: Name That Commissioner https://tucson.com/business/investment/personal-finance/social-security-you-name-that- commissioner/article_20fd573b-0184-5ad7-88f8-b2daae056a3b.html Social Security & You Social Security & You: Name that commissioner • By Tom Margenau • Nov 24, 2019 I am going to give you a series of names. I would give any reader a hundred bucks if he or she could tell me who these people are and what they all have in common. Here are the names: Stanford Ross. William Driver. John Svahn. Martha McSteen. Dorcas Hardy. Gwendolyn King. Shirley Chater. Kenneth Apfel. Michael Astrue. So, who are they? They are nine of the past 29 commissioners of Social Security. The commissioner of Social Security is the top spot within the Social Security Administration. He or she is responsible for running one of the largest agencies in the federal government. This includes maintaining Social Security numbers and earnings records for nearly every working American and paying retirement, disability and survivor benefits to about 62 million people every month. Yet, almost no one knows who these people are. Most folks can probably name the FBI director or the head of the CIA. But SSA is one of the many federal agencies whose top dog might as well be named Underdog. Who heads the Veterans Administration? Who is the commissioner of the IRS? Who runs the Federal Highway Administration? How about the Bureau of Labor Statistics? The heads of these and so many other federal agencies are almost always nameless political appointees. And therein lies a story I’d like to tell. For part of my career with the SSA, I worked for several Social Security commissioners. Usually in the role of a speechwriter. Sometimes as an agency press officer (well, OK, deputy press officer). By no means was I a major player on any commissioner’s staff. But, as I used to say, “At least I was in the room.” In other words, if the commissioner had a meeting with his or her top staff, I might be sitting in a chair in the corner — usually taking notes. So I got to know a lot about the inner workings of the agency. I learned what the head of a big agency like the SSA really does. One of the commissioners I worked for (I won’t name names) was President Ronald Reagan’s pick to head Social Security. And one time, soon after she was appointed, she told me that Reagan told her this: “You really have only one job. Make sure those damn checks go out on time every month!” But let’s be honest about that. The issuance of Social Security checks is pretty institutionalized. It’s built into the nature of the bureaucracy. Social Security checks have gone out on time every month for about 80 years now. Donald Duck could be the commissioner of Social Security, and the checks still would go out like clockwork each month. After all, commissioners come and go. It’s the dedicated civil servants who have been with the agency for decades who really keep the place humming along and make sure those checks always go out in a timely manner. So what the commissioner really does — what the head of any large organization really does — is set the tone for how services will be provided and how staff workers will be allocated to provide those services. And he or she also sets goals. And for so many years, one of the top goals of every commissioner who ran the SSA, whether appointed by a Democratic or Republican president, was to improve the processing of Social Security disability claims. And why was that? Because a disability program is a mess to run. Think about it. What do you have to do to get retirement benefits? You prove you’re old enough, you sign a couple of forms, and the checks start rolling in. Same thing for survivors benefits. You show the SSA a death certificate, fill out a form or two, and your claim is complete. But the disability program is a whole other kettle of fish. And a big, stinky kettle it is! Retirement and survivors benefits are very objective. But disability is very subjective. Consider this: How disabled must a person be to qualify for disability benefits? People have been struggling to answer that question for 63 years now. (The Social Security disability program began in 1956.) To prove how subjective disability is, all you have to do is look at the SSA’s appeals workload. There are a handful of people who appeal a retirement or survivor claim, but there are tens of thousands of pending appeals of disability claims. An entire cottage industry of lawyers and disability consultants has sprung up to help people get a disability claim approved. But the SSA’s newest commissioner might be setting a different tone, with more emphasis on core services. Let’s talk about that. His name is Andrew Saul. President Trump appointed him several months ago. Before I go on, I must make a point. A long time ago, a chief of staff for one of the Social Security commissioners told me this: “Tom, when a Democrat is president, you will get a good commissioner of Social Security. When a Republican is president, you will get an ineffective commissioner of Social Security.” This seemingly biased analysis carried a bit of weight with me because the chief of staff who told me this was a Republican political appointee! His reasoning went like this. For years, Social Security has been known as a favorite of the Democratic Party. So if a Democrat is president, and you are a potential Democratic political appointee, you would be pleased and honored to be named the commissioner of Social Security. Some of the best and brightest people available got the job. On the other hand, if a Republican is president, and you are a potential Republican political appointee, almost the last job you want is to be the head of Social Security. More desirable jobs were filled by the top people, and SSA got someone from near the bottom of the Republican political appointee barrel. (And again, remember, these sentiments were those of a Republican politico.) Because of that, I was very skeptical when I heard that Trump nominated Andrew Saul as head of the SSA. Plus, this guy comes into the job with some political baggage. Many Democrats opposed his appointment because he was previously associated with some right-wing groups that advocated cuts in Social Security benefits. Despite all that, I must admit I was impressed with some of his initial actions as the SSA commissioner. I don’t have the space to cover them here. But I encourage my readers to go to the SSA official website. On the home page, you will see an “open letter to the public from Commissioner Saul.” Take a few minutes to read it. It sounds to me like he is going to concentrate on meaningful things like cutting wait times at the SSA’s 800 number and improving service at local Social Security offices. So read his letter, and see what you think. Gosh, I sure hope he means what he says and doesn’t turn into just another in the long line of bottom-of-the-barrel, ineffective Republican political appointees to Social Security. .
Recommended publications
  • Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay, Ca
    RITZ-CARLTON HALF MOON BAY, CA APRIL 23-25, 2017 CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD PDF TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 Value Program Members .......................................................... 3 Gold Value Program Members ...................................................... 4 Silver Value Program Members ................................................... 13 Bronze Value Program Members ................................................ 18 Agenda................................................................................................. 29 Hotel Map ........................................................................................... 32 Speaker Biographies ......................................................................... 33 Attendees ............................................................................................ 42 By Name ......................................................................................... 42 By Company ................................................................................... 45 Meeting Dates .................................................................................... 48 Board of Directors ............................................................................. 50 Current Data ....................................................................................... 53 SVIA Annual Investment and Policy Survey for 2016 ................ 53 SVIA Quarterly Characteristics Survey through 4Q2016 .......... 73 Stable Times Volume 20 Issue 2 .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Woman 1987-88: a Report in Depth. INSTITUTION Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 293 737 SO 018 577 AUTHOR Rix, Sara E., Ed. TITLE The American Woman 1987-88: A Report in Depth. INSTITUTION Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues, Washington, DC. Women's Research and Education Inst. REPORT NO ISBN-0-393-30388-8 PUB DATE 87 NOTE 350p. AVAILABLE FROMW. W. Norton and Company, 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110 (paperback, $7.95; ISBN-0-393-02384-2, hardcover, $18.95). PUB TYPE Books (010) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC14 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Studies; *Economic Change; *Economic Status; *Females; Feminism; *Social Change; *Social Status; United States History; Womens Education; Womens Studies IDENTIFIERS *Political Implications ABSTRACT This book is the first edition of what is to be an annual report on the status of women in the United states. It presents information concerning changes in U.S. women's roles and analyzes the social and political consequences of these changes. This premier edition provides a broad overview of how women's lives have changed dur'.ng the 20th century, with special emphasis on their roles in families and in the U.S. economy. Chapter titles and authors include: (1) "Women in Twentieth Century America: An Overview" (S. M. Evans); (2) "Women and the Family" (A. Cherlin); (3) "Women and the Economy" (N. Barrett); (4) "The Women's Movement in Recent American Politics" (M. L. Palley); and (5) "1986 in Review" (A. J. Stone). A section entitled "Women in Brief" includes a series of chapters that describe women in relation to business, the military, science, broadcasting, sports, unions, education, theatre, and reproduction alternatives and options and the status of black, latino, and immigrant women.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report FY 2020 Combined
    FY 2020 by the Numbers 12 BOARD 7 MEETINGS PUBLISHED WORKS Meetings with 9 6 SSA stakeholders IT SYSTEMS PANEL 81,415 Impressions and 2 1 0 new Followers 18 meetings with 44 experts VIRTUAL SITE VISITS Meetings with representatives from SSA management associations and unions in 25 states in all of SSA's 10 regions. 22K+ 270 VIRTUAL REP-PAYEE FORUM ATTENDEES WEBSITE VISITS Table of Contents I. Message from the Chair ............................................................................................... 1 II. Fiscal Year 2020 Accomplishments ............................................................................ 4 Letter to Commissioner Urges Action Amid Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic ..... 4 Letter to Commissioner Urges Eliminating Filing Deadlines for COVID-19 Dependent Payments ............................................................................................... 4 Brief Examines Social Security's Decision to Reinstate Reconsideration Appeal ..... 4 Report Urges More Transparency and Better Use of Evidence in Decisions to Close Social Security Field Offices ..................................................................................... 5 Member Submits Individual Statement on the SSI Program ..................................... 5 Independent Report Reviews Selection Process for Representative Payees of Adults ........................................................................................................................ 6 Board Hosts Forum on Opportunities to Improve Representative Payee Service
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Times
    SVIA Nsltr_6_A 6/30/14 5:08 PM Page 1 STABLE TIMES The publication of the Stable Value Investment Association Volume 18, Issue 1 • First Half 2014 Making Retirement The 2014 Elections and IN THIS ISSUE Income Security Work What Will They Mean Making Retirement Income By Randy Myers By Randy Myers Security Work By Randy Myers ....................................1 Stable Value Investment Association Chair- Could a Republican takeover of the U.S. Sen- man James King is proud to be part of the ate make it easier for President Obama to get The 2014 Elections and stable value industry. “It is an important asset things done? Republican businesswoman What Will They Mean class, and it’s part of the fabric of defined Gwendolyn King, president of the Podium By Randy Myers ....................................1 contribution plans,” he said as he welcomed Prose speakers bureau and a former Social his industry colleagues to the SVIA’s 2014 Security commissioner, thinks it’s possible. A Predictable Surprise: Spring Seminar in April. “We should be proud The Unraveling of the U.S. of being stewards of stable value, and of Republicans already control the House. Con- Retirement System bringing it to retirement plans in the Ameri- ventional wisdom posits that gaining a lock on By Randy Myers ....................................1 can workplace.” both chambers of Congress would make it even more difficult for President Obama to Outlook and Trends in King, also managing director and senior client carry out his agenda in the final years of his Defined Contribution Plans portfolio manager in the Stable Value Markets second term.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 SSAB Annual Report
    Social Security Advisory Board Annual Report 2006 August 2007 Social Security Advisory Board An independent, bipartisan Board created by the Congress and appointed by the President and the Congress to advise the President, the Congress, and the Commissioner of Social Security on matters related to the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income programs. Message from the Board Since the Board began meeting in the spring of 1996, we have focused on the mandates that the law provides to analyze and make recommendations about the Nation’s retirement and disability systems. Our work has encompassed a number of important issues including the Social Security disability programs; responsibility of the Social Security Administration to operate its programs with integrity and to provide excellent service to the public; long-range financing for Social Security; the administration of the Supplemental Security Income program; and other challenges facing Social Security. Our reports and recommendations have been issued by consensus and without dissent, and they have been widely distributed to Members of Congress, the Administration, and the public. The primary emphasis of our work in 2006 was on the Nation’s disability programs, the problems they face and our recommendations on how they can better address the issues of the 21st Century. In May, we updated our 2001 report, Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials, a compendium of data and materials relating to the Social Security disability programs. In September, we issued A Disability System for the 21st Century, a report that describes the need for a coordinated and integrated national disability system. In that report we discussed many of the problems with the current disability programs, and provided a broad outline of how they might better serve today’s individuals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Role of the Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Social Security Administration
    Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 15 Issue 2 Article 5 10-15-1995 The Evolution and Role of the Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Social Security Administration Charles N. Bono Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Disability Law Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Charles N. Bono, The Evolution and Role of the Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Social Security Administration, 15 J. Nat’l Ass’n Admin. L. Judges. (1995) available at https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol15/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. The Evolution and Role of the Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Hearings and Appeals in the Social Security Administration Charles N. Bono I. ROLE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE The role of the Federal Administrative Law Judge is described and outlined in the Office of Personnel Management Official Position Description (PD), the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Federal Regulations (CFR) Statutes (USCA), decisions of the Supreme Court and other courts of the land. It has also been discussed in many Congressional hearings. The re-engineering proposals, which are the subject of this article, and the Short Term Disability Project (STDP) recently implemented by Social Security Administration (SSA) transfer a significant number of the administrative law judge functions to someone in SSA, other than an APA protected ALJ, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Social Security Advisory Board Annual Report
    2016 Annual Report Social Security Advisory Board Table of Contents Message from the Board In 2016, the Board continued its mission to provide bipartisan advice on the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs to the President, Congress, 03 Message from the Board and the Commissioner of Social Security. The 2016 Annual Report of the Social Security Advisory Board provides an overview of this work. We thank Acting Commissioner 05 About the Board Carolyn Colvin, Social Security Administration (SSA) employees, Congressional staff, and the many stakeholders and experts who met with us throughout the year for 06 Board Members working with us. 07 2016 Board Members The Board called for reexamination of the representative payee (rep payee) program in the Board’s annual SSI Statement (also an appendix to SSA’s annual report of the SSI 13 2016 Accomplishments program). The Board also addressed unique issues with rep payees in the SSI program in one of its major 2016 publications, a report on rep payees. In addition, the Board 20 Highlights of the Monthly Board Meetings also commissioned both an independent report and an independent single issue Technical Panel made up of expert economists. The Labor Force Technical Panel was 21 Additional Outreach tasked with focusing on the complexity of the labor force projection methodology and 24 2016 Publications and Public Events its future trends in calculating solvency. In Representative Payees: A Call to Action, the Board called on SSA and interested 26 Public Inquiries stakeholders to reexamine the entire rep payee program, including SSA’s procedures for determining the need for a rep payee, selecting a qualified rep payee, providing 28 Board Staff training to both SSA staff and the rep payee, and the oversight process The Board’s SSI Statement also focused on rep payees and their role in managing benefits for SSI 30 Board Meetings recipients.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Age Cathedral Age Is a Benefit of Nca Membership
    CATHEDRCATHEDR AL AL AGEAGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL | SUMMER 2016 a bold and powerful witness CATHEDRAL AGE SUMMER 2016 4 A Personal Connection 18 The Gospel 30 The Lee-Jackson Windows Dean-elect Randy Hollerith Task Force Report According to Vader the rt. rev. mariann edgar budde kevin eckstrom 36 A Place of Worship, 6 An Even Greater Love 20 Spotlight on Scholars Welcome and Witness Homily for First Lady Nancy Reagan kevin eckstrom the rev. canon jan naylor cope the rev. stuart a. kenworthy 23 In a Van Down 38 Focus 9 Second Sundays News from the Cathedral by the River 10 A “Bold & Powerful mikah meyer 44 Passages “Contract Let for North Transept” Witness” 24 Onward! To Phase 2 A look at the history and wisdom Interview with Presiding Bishop Earthquake Restoration Update in the Cathedral Age archives Michael Curry james w. shepherd 16 Faith over Fear 28 One Final Choosing Unity over Extremism rabbi m. bruce lustig Standing Ovation The Musical Legacy of J. Reilly Lewis margaret shannon Restoring the nation’s cathedral to its original glory, one stone at a time, is an honor and a privilege. Thank you for above crane and scaffolding in place at the north transept for the opportunity. phase 2a earthquake restoration work photo c. winterbottom on the cover families enjoying a lightshow in the nave during www.lortonstone.com february’s seeing deeper week of programs photo d. thomas summer 2016 CATHEDRAL AGE contributors Bishop of Washington Mariann Edgar Budde is the Cathedral Age is the official publication of Washington spiritual leader of 40,500 Episcopalians in 89 con- National Cathedral.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the “Straight State”: Welfare Politics, Health Care, and Public Policy in the Shadow of AIDS
    Rethinking the “Straight State”: Welfare Politics, Health Care, and Public Policy in the Shadow of AIDS Jonathan Bell Abstract This article considers together questions of political economy and sexual politics to establish how welfare bureaucrats, health care advocacy groups, and queer activists understood and debated health care policy at both the federal and state levels between the late 1970s and late 1980s. Much attention has been paid to political struggles for treatment of HIV and AIDS during the 1980s, but this article focuses on efforts of people with AIDS (PWAs) to access the labyrinthine and, up to that point, resolutely heteronormative welfare system. I argue that efforts of AIDS activists to access public health benefits through the welfare state highlighted the inadequacies of a system predicated upon the centrality of disability as a marker of eligibility for health benefits. As more and more of those suffering from medical conditions related to what we now know as HIV lost private health insurance, they were forced to seek classification by state social welfare agencies as medically disabled in order to access public funds. However, the state welfare apparatus did not work on the principle of medical need, but rather adopted the Center for Disease Control’s categorization of disability via disease categories that rendered those with more powerful advocacy voices more likely to gain the imprimatur of state approval. As the AIDS crisis developed and affected a diverse range of people by the end of the decade, it became clear that the Social Security Administration was unwilling to broaden access to the welfare system to cope with a diversifying epidemic, one that exemplified a wider reality of poverty and exclusion rather than a limited crisis affecting small numbers of primarily white males.
    [Show full text]
  • Statements from Participants
    The WhiteHouse Conferenceon SocialSecurity StatementsFromParticipants December8-9,1998 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON December 4, 1998 I am pleased to welcome all those who are participating in the first-ever White House Conference on Social Security. During the past year, we have worked hard to foster a national discussion on Social Security reform. Through regional forums -- culminating in this conference -- we have strived to create a climate conducive to bipartisan Social Security reform. We now have a historic opportunity to save Social Security for the 21st century. Since its creation more than 60 years ago, Social Security has been a bedrock of retirement security for Americans. That's why it is so important for all of us to work together to find the best way to strengthen Social Security for future generations. There are 76 million baby boomers in our country today who are looking ahead to retirement. Consequently, by the year 2030, there will be twice as many elderly Americans putting pressure on the Social Security system as there are today. After 2032, Social Security will only have enough resources to cover 72 cents on the dollar of current benefits. We must act now to tackle this tough, long-term challenge. We must strengthen Social Security, and I believe we can do it in a way that maintains universality and fairness, ensures that Social Security continues to provide a benefit people can count on, protects low-income beneficiaries and those with disabili- ties, and sustains our fiscal discipline. This conference will help to pave the way for comprehensive, bipartisan Social Security reform next year.
    [Show full text]
  • 1989 Journal
    OCTOBER TERM, 1989 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics n General m Appeals in Arguments in Attorneys in Briefs iv Certiorari iv Costs v Judgments and Opinions v Miscellaneous v Original Cases v Parties vi Records vi Rehearings vi Rules vi Stays vi Conclusion vn (i) II STATISTICS AS OF JUNE 28, 1990 In Forma Paid Oripnal Pauperis Total Cases Cases Number of cases on docket 14 2,416 3,316 5,746 Cases disposed of 2 2,051 2,879 4,932 Remaining on docket 12 365 437 814 Cases docketed during term: Paid cases 2,032 In forma pauperis cases 2,885 Original cases 1 Total 4,918 Cases remaining from last term 828 Total cases on docket 5,746 Cases disposed of 4,932 Number of remaining on docket 814 Petitions for certiorari granted: In paid cases 100 In in forma pauperis cases 19 Appeals granted: In paid cases 3 In in forma pauperis cases 0 Total cases granted plenary review 123* Cases argued during term 146 Number disposed of by full opinions 143 Number disposed of by per curiam opinions 3 Number set for reargument next term 0 Cases available for argument at beginning of term 81 Disposed of summarily after review was granted 1 Original cases set for argument 1 Cases reviewed and decided without oral argument 79 Total cases available for argument at start of next term 57 Number of written opinions of the Court 129 Opinions per curiam in argued cases 3 Number of lawyers admitted to practice as of October 1, 1990: On written motion 4,623 On oral motion 1,173 Total 5,796 *Includes 74, Original.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Security Notices Hearing Committee on Ways
    SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SECURITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 Serial 106±65 Printed for the use of the Committee on Ways and Means ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 67±603 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 20-JUL-2000 13:31 Nov 14, 2000 Jkt 060010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 K:\HEARINGS\67603.TXT WAYS1 PsN: WAYS1 COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS BILL ARCHER, Texas, Chairman PHILIP M. CRANE, Illinois CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BILL THOMAS, California FORTNEY PETE STARK, California E. CLAY SHAW, JR., Florida ROBERT T. MATSUI, California NANCY L. JOHNSON, Connecticut WILLIAM J. COYNE, Pennsylvania AMO HOUGHTON, New York SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan WALLY HERGER, California BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JIM MCCRERY, Louisiana JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington DAVE CAMP, Michigan GERALD D. KLECZKA, Wisconsin JIM RAMSTAD, Minnesota JOHN LEWIS, Georgia JIM NUSSLE, Iowa RICHARD E. NEAL, Massachusetts SAM JOHNSON, Texas MICHAEL R. MCNULTY, New York JENNIFER DUNN, Washington WILLIAM J. JEFFERSON, Louisiana MAC COLLINS, Georgia JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee ROB PORTMAN, Ohio XAVIER BECERRA, California PHILIP S. ENGLISH, Pennsylvania KAREN L. THURMAN, Florida WES WATKINS, Oklahoma LLOYD DOGGETT, Texas J.D. HAYWORTH, Arizona JERRY WELLER, Illinois KENNY HULSHOF, Missouri SCOTT MCINNIS, Colorado RON LEWIS, Kentucky MARK FOLEY, Florida A.L. SINGLETON, Chief of Staff JANICE MAYS, Minority Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SECURITY E. CLAY SHAW, JR., Florida, Chairman SAM JOHNSON, Texas ROBERT T. MATSUI, California MAC COLLINS, Georgia SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JOHN S.
    [Show full text]