2213 Missouri Ave Carthage, Mo 64836 800-970-4479 A Business of ESM Technologies, LLC stratumnutrition.com
Research Summary
Research & Patent Portfolio for BLIS Oral-cavity Probiotics: BLIS K12™ & BLIS M18™
Rev. Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 Research & Patent Portfolio for BLIS Probiotics: BLIS K12™ & BLIS M18™ B L I S K 12 and B L I S M18 are h i gh ly ad va nce d pro bi o t i cs f o r t h e o ral ca vi t y and upper resp i rat o ry t ract . B L I S K 12 co lo ni ze s i n t h e m o ut h and h elps t o m ai nt ai n ear, no se and t h ro at ( E N T ) i m m une h ealt h , w h i le B L I S M18 su ppo rt s t o o t h and gum h ealt h . B L I S pro bi o t i cs w ere o ri gi nally d i sco ve red as sci ent i st s st ud i ed t h e o ral m i cr o bi o m e o f a ch i ld w i t h ex ce pt i o nal t h ro at h ealt h . B o t h B L I S K 12 and B L I S M18, o r S treptococcus salivarius ( S . salivarius) , w ere i so lat ed f ro m t h e m o ut h s of healthy humans and can help to establish or re-establish a healthy balance of beneficial bacteria in the oral cavity and upper resp i rat o ry t ract .
Published Research in Peer-reviewed Journals:
ENT Health 1) P as s ari ello C , D i N ard o F, P o li m eni A, D i N ard o D , T es t arelli L . ( 2 02 0) P ro bi o t i c S treptococcus salivarius red uc es s y m p- t o m s o f d ent ure s t o m at i t i s and o ral c o lo ni z at i o n by C andida albicans. Applied S ciences, 10: 3002 .
2 ) B ert uc c i o li A, R o c c h i M, Mo rgant i I , V i c i G , G erv as i M, Am at o ri S and Si s t i D . ( 2 019) S treptococcus salivarius K 12 i n ph a- ry ngo t o ns i lli t i s and ac ut e o t i t i s m ed i a – a m et a- analy s i s . N utrafoods, 2 : 80- 88.
3) Marini G, Sitzia E, Panatta ML and De Vincentiis GC. (2019) Pilot study to explore the prophylactic efficacy of oral probiot- i c S treptococcus salivarius K 12 i n prev ent i ng rec urrent ph ary ngo - t o ns i llar epi s o d es i n ped i at ri c pat i ent s . I nternational J ournal of G eneral M edicine, 12 : 2 13- 2 17 .
4) H u L , Mao Q , Z h o u P , L v X , H ua H and Y an Z . ( 2 019) E f f ec t s o f S treptococcus salivarius K 12 w i t h ny s t at i n o n o ral c and i d i - as i s – R C T . O ral D iseases 2 5( 6) : 157 3- 1580.
5) D i P i erro F, R i s s o P , P o ggi E , T i Mi t i lli A, B o llo li S, B runo M, C anev a E , C am pus R and G i annat t as i o A. ( 2 018) U s e o f S treptococcus salivarius K 12 t o red uc e t h e i nc i d enc e o f ph ary ngo - t o ns i lli t i s and ac ut e o t i t i s m ed i a i n c h i ld ren: a ret ro s pec t i v e analy s i s i n no t - rec urrent ped i at ri c s ubj ec t s . M inerva P ediatrica, 7 0( 3) : 2 40- 2 45.
6) D i P i erro F, C o lo m bo M, G i uli ani MG , D anz a ML , B as i le I , B o llani , T , C o nt i AM, Z anv i t A, and R o t t o li AS. ( 2 016) E f f ec t o f ad m i ni s t rat i o n o f S treptococcus salivarius K 12 o n t h e o c c urrenc e o f s t rept o c o c c al ph ary ngo - t o ns i lli t i s , s c arlet f ev er, and ac ut e o t i t i s m ed i a i n 3 y ears o ld c h i ld ren. European R eview for M edical and P h armacological S ciences, 2 0: 4601- 4606.
7 ) D i P i erro F, C o lo m bo M, Z anv i t A, and R o t t o li AS. ( 2 016) P o s i t i v e c li ni c al o ut c o m es d eri v ed f ro m us i ng S treptococcus sali- varius K 12 t o prev ent s t rept o c o c c al ph ary ngi t i s i n c h i ld ren: a pi lo t i nv es t i gat i o n. D rug H ealth care and P atient S afety , 8: 7 7 - 81.
8) G rego ri G , R i gh i O , R i s s o P , B o i ard i G , D em uru G , Ferz et t i A, G alli A, G h i s o ni M, L enz i ni S, Marengh i C , Mura C , Sac c h et t i R and Suz z ani L . ( 2 016) R ed uc t i o n o f gro up A bet a- h em o ly t i c s t rept o c o c c us ph ary ngo - t o ns i llar i nf ec t i o ns as s o c i at ed w i t h us e o f t h e o ral pro bi o t i c S treptococcus salivarius K 12 : a ret ro s pec t i v e o bs erv at i o nal s t ud y . T h erapeutics and C linical R isk M an- agement, 12 : 87 - 92 . stratumnutrition.com [email protected] (800) 970-4479
* T h es e s t at em ent s h av e no t been ev aluat ed by t h e Fo o d and D rug Ad m i ni s t rat i o n. T h i s pro d uc t i s no t i nt end ed t o d i agno s e, t reat , c ure, o r prev ent any d i s eas e. ENT Health, continued
9) Di Pierro F, Di Pasquale D and Di Cicco M. (2015) Oral use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 in children with secretory otitis media: preliminary results of a pilot, uncontrolled study. International Journal of General Medicine, 8:303-308.
10) Di Pierro F, Colombo M, Zanvit A, Risso P and Rottoli A. (2014) Use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the prevention of streptococcal and viral pharyngotonsillitis in children. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, 6:15-20.
11) Di Pierro F, Adami T, Rapacioli G, Giardini N and Streitberger C. (2013) Clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Strepto- coccus salivarius K12 in the prevention of recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes in adults. Expert Opinion Biological Therapy, 13(3):339-343.
12) Fiedler T, Riani C, Koczan D, Standar K, Kreikemeyer B and Podbielski A. (2013) Protective mechanisms of respiratory tract streptococci against Streptococcus pyogenes biofilm formation and epithelial cell infection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79:1265-1276.
13) Di Pierro F, Donato G, Fomia F, Adami T, Careddu D, Cassandro C and Albera R. (2012) Preliminary pediatric clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in preventing recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes and recurrent acute otitis media. International Journal of General Medicine, 5:991-997.
14) Ishijima S, Hayama K, Burton J, Reid G, Okada M, Matsushita Y and Abe S. (2012) Effect of Streptococcus salivarius K12 on the in vitro growth of Candida albicans and its protective effect in an oral candidiasis model. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 78(7):2190-2199.
15) Guglielmetti S, Taverniti V, Minuzzo M, Arioli S, Stuknyte M, Karp M and Mora D. (2010) Oral bacteria as potential probi- otics for the pharyngeal mucosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(12):3948-3958.
16) Power D, Burton J, Chilcott C, Dawes P and Tagg J. (2008) Preliminary investigations of the colonisation of upper respiratory tract tissues of infants using a paediatric formulation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 27: 1261.
17) Horz H, Meinelt A, Houben B and Conrads G. (2007) Distribution and persistence of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the human oral cavity as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiology and Immu- nology, 22(2):126-130.
18) Dierksen K, Moore C, Inglis M, Wescombe P and Tagg J. (2007) The effect of ingestion of milk supplemented with saliva- ricin A-producing Streptococcus salivarius on the bacteriocin-like inhibitory activity of streptococcal populations on the tongue. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 59:584-591.
19) Hyink O, Wescombe P, Upton M, Ragland N, Burton J and Tagg J. (2007) Salivaricin A2 and the novel lantibiotic saliva- ricin B are encoded at adjacent loci on a 190-kilobase transmissible megaplasmid in the oral probiotic strain Streptococcus salivarius K12. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(4):1107-1113.
20) Tagg J, Wescombe P and Burton J. (2006) Oral streptococcal BLIS: Heterogeneity of the effector molecules and poten- tial role in the prevention of streptococcal infections. International Congress Series, 1289:347-350.
21) Wescombe P, Burton J, Cadieux P, Klesse N, Hyink O, Heng N, Chilcott C, Reid G and Tagg J. (2006) Megaplasmids encode differing combinations of lantibiotics in Streptococcus salivarius. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 90(3):269-280.
22) Wescombe P, Upton M, Dierksen K, Ragland N, Sivabalan S, Wirawan R, Inglis M, Moore C, Walker G, Chilcott C, Jenkinson H and Tagg J. (2006) Production of the lantibiotic salivaricin A and its variants by oral Streptococci and use of a specific induction assay to detect their presence in human saliva. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 72(2):1459-1466. stratumnutrition.com [email protected] (800) 970-4479
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. ENT Health, continued
23) Tagg J. (2004) Prevention of streptococcal pharyngitis by anti-Streptococcus pyogenes bacteriocin-like inhibitory sub- stances (BLIS) produced by Streptococcus salivarius. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 119:13-16.
24) Dierksen K and Tagg J. (1999) The influence of indigenous bacteriocin-producing Streptococcus Salivarius on the ac- quisition of Streptococcus Pyogenes by primary school children in Dunedin, New Zealand. Proceedings of the XIV Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases, 81-85, New Zealand.
25) Fantinato V, Jorge A and Shimizu M. (1999) Production of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) by Streptococ- cus Salivarius strains isolated from the tongue and throat of children with and without sore throat. Revista de Microbiologia, 30(4):332-334.
Halitosis 26) Jamali Z, Aminabadi N A, Samiei M, Deljavan A S, Shokravi M and Shirazi S. (2016) Impact of chlorhexidine pretreat- ment followed by probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain K12 on halitosis in children: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, 14(4):305-313.
27) Masdea L, Kulik E, Hauser-Gerspach I, Ramseier A, Filippi A and Waltimo T. (2012) Antimicrobial activity of Streptococ- cus salivarius K12 on bacteria involved in oral malodour. Archives of Oral Biology, 57(8):1041-1047.
28) Burton J, Chilcott C, Moore C, Speiser G and Tagg J. (2006) A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 100(4):754-764.
29) Kazor C, Mitchell P, Lee A, Stokes L, Loesche W, Dewhirst F and Paster B. (2003) Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(2):558-563.
Safety 30) Barretto C, Alvarez-Martin P, Foata F, Renault P and Berger B. (2012) Genome sequence of the lantibiotic bacteriocin producer Streptococcus salivarius strain K12. Journal of Bacteriology, 1194(21):5959-5960.
31) Burton J, Cowley S, Simon R, McKinney J, Wescombe P and Tagg J. (2011) Evaluation of safety and human tolerance of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49:2356-2364.
32) Burton J, Chilcott C, Wescombe P and Tagg J. (2010) Extended safety data for the oral cavity probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2:135-144.
33) Burton J, Wescombe P, Moore C, Chilcott C and Tagg J. (2006) Safety assessment of the oral cavity probiotic Strepto- coccus salivarius K12. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(4)3050-3053.
Immune Modulating Effects and Mode-of-Action 34) Cosseau C, Devine D, Dullaghan E, Gardy J, Chikatamarla A, Gellatly S, Yu L, Pistolic J, Falsafi R, Tagg J and Hancock R. (2008) The commensal Streptococcus salivarius K12 downregulates the innate immune responses of human epithelial cells and promotes host-microbe homeostasis. Infection and Immunity, 76(9):4163-4175.
35) Chilcott C, Crowley L, Kulkarni V, Jack R, McLellan A and Tagg J. (2005) Elevated levels of interferon gamma in human saliva following ingestion of Streptococcus salivarius K12. Joint meeting of New Zealand Microbiological Society and New Zealand Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dunedin.
Patent Portfolio:
US 8,057,790 “Treatment of malodour” (2011). This invention relates to methods for inhibiting growth of anaerobic bacteria, particularly halitosis causing bacteria. The methods use BLIS-producing Streptococcus salivarius strains, extracts thereof, and compositions comprising same in the prevention or treatment of halitosis. stratumnutrition.com [email protected] (800) 970-4479
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. US 7,595,041 “Treatment of Malodour (2009). This invention relates to methods for inhibiting growth of anaerobic bacteria, particularly halitosis causing bacteria. The methods use BLIS-producing Streptococcus salivarius strains, extracts thereof, and compositions comprising same in the prevention or treatment of halitosis.
EP 1 169 340 “Lantibiotic” (2007). US 6,773,912 “Lantibiotic” (2004). This invention provides an antibacterial protein, Saliva- ricin B. Salivaricin B is bacteriocidal with respect to, inter alia, S. pyogenes and therefore has numerous therapeutic applica- tions. These applications include, but are not limited to, forming part of therapeutic formulations for use in treating or prevent- ing streptococcal infections of the throat.
Published Research in Peer-reviewed Journals:
Dental Health 1) Di Pierro F, Zanvit A, Nobili P, Risso P, Fornaini C. (2015) Cariogram outcome after 90 days of oral treatment with Strep- tococcus salivarius M18 in children at high risk for dental caries: results of a randomized, controlled study. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, 7:107-113.
2) Gobbi E, De Francesco MA, Piccinelli G, Caruso A, Bardellini E and Majorana A. (2020) In vitro inhibitory effect of two commercial probiotics on chromogenic actinomycetes. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40368-020-00512-2.
3) Bardellini E, Amadori F, Gobbi E, Ferri A, Conti G and Majorana A. (2020) Does Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 as- sumption make black stains disappear in children? Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, 18:161-164.
4) Scariya L, Nagarathna D and Varghese M. (2015) Probiotics in Periodontal Therapy. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 6(1):242-250.
5) Burton J, Drummond B, Chilcott C, Tagg J, Thomson W, Hale J and Wescombe P. (2013) Influence of the probiotic Strep- tococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 62(6):875-884.
6) Burton J, Wescombe P, Macklaim J, Chai M, MacDonald K, Hale J, Tagg J, Reid G, Gloor G and Cadieux P. (2013) Per- sistence of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 is dose dependent and megaplasmid transfer can augment their bacteriocin production and adhesion characteristics. PLoS One, 8:e65991.
Safety 7) Heng N, Haji-Ishak N, Kalyan A, Wong A, Lovric´ M, Bridson J, Artamonova J, Stanton J, Wescombe P, Burton J, Cullinan M and Tagg J. (2011) Genome sequence of the bacteriocin-producing oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18. Journal of Bacteriology, 193(22):6402-6403.
Patent Portfolio:
EP 1 483 366 “Antimicrobial Composition” (2010). US 7,226,590 “Antimicrobial Composition” (2007). This invention provides novel Streptococcus salivarius, compositions containing same, and use of S. salivarius strains as antimicrobial agents. The strains are bacterial inhibitors with respect to at least S. mutans and/or MS and therefore have a number of therapeutic appli- cations. The applications include but are not limited to forming part of therapeutic formulations for use in controlling, treating, or preventing dental caries. stratumnutrition.com [email protected] (800) 970-4479
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. applied sciences
Article Probiotic Streptococcus salivarius Reduces Symptoms of Denture Stomatitis and Oral Colonization by Candida albicans
Claudio Passariello 1 , Francesco Di Nardo 2, Antonella Polimeni 3 , Dario Di Nardo 3,* and Luca Testarelli 3 1 Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 2 Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Novara, Viale Roma, 7-28100 Novara, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Via Caserta, 6-00161 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (L.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-339-3935-527
Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 25 April 2020
Abstract: Denture stomatitis (DS) is an inflammatory status of oral mucosae frequently observed in denture wearers, and mainly associated with oral overgrowth of Candida albicans. DS is the cause of multiple visits to the dental office and is thought to enhance the risk of systemic infections. The treatment of DS mainly relies upon improvement of oral hygiene measures and prescription of topical or systemic antifungal agents, and disinfectants that, although effective, are not without drawbacks. Since, in recent years, some probiotics were investigated as a means to contrast oral colonization by Candida spp., this study was designed to preliminarily evaluate the effects of probiotic strain Streptococcus salivarius K12, in subjects affected by DS, and the duration of these effects. Fifty adult denture wearers affected by DS were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group was instructed to perform careful oral and denture hygiene and to assume the probiotic preparation for 30 days; the control group received only oral hygiene instructions. Patients were evaluated for signs of DS at the beginning of the study, at the end of treatment and 30 days later. Microbiological samples were obtained at the beginning of the study and at the end of treatment to quantify Candida albicans cells. Experimental treatment reduced clinical signs and symptoms of DS and the count of C. albicans. The clinical effects of experimental treatment were still evident after 30 days, suggesting that administration of probiotic strain Streptococcus salivarius K12 could be a promising approach in the treatment of DS.
Keywords: denture stomatitis; Candida albicans; probiotic; Streptococcus salivarius
1. Introduction Life expectancy significantly increased in industrialized countries in the last century, while natality progressively reduced [1]; consequently, the proportion of elderly subjects significantly increased, with evident healthcare issues in all fields of medicine, including dentistry [2,3]. Edentulism (both partial and total) is among the most frequent dental problems of an aged population, and in many cases it is treated by removable dentures [4]. An inflammatory status of the oral mucosal areas covered by the denture is frequently observed in denture wearers. This inflammatory condition is commonly known as denture stomatitis (DS). The prevalence of DS was reported to range from 15% to over 70%, depending on variables including: continuous use of the denture, quality of oral and denture hygiene (frequently limited by dexterity of the subject), adequateness of the denture, and co-morbidities such as diabetes [5].
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002; doi:10.3390/app10093002 www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 2 of 10
The etiology of DS is multifactorial, but Candida albicans and other fungi of the genus Candida are believed to be key etiologic factors. Several members of the genus Candida are common members of oral biofilms and are able to overgrow in the denture microenvironment, inducing inflammation and acting as promoters of opportunistic polymicrobial infections, frequently observed in DS [5–9]. Clinically DS is characterized by soreness, pain, discomfort, denture mobilization and is consequently the cause of multiple visits to the dental office. DS is, moreover, believed to be a condition potentially enhancing the risk of pulmonary and other systemic infections, particularly in institutionalized elderly subjects [10–12]. The prevention and treatment of DS in many cases relies only upon an examination of the adequacy of the denture, improvement of oral hygiene measures and a discontinuation of nocturnal wearing of the denture [13]. Therapeutic strategies based upon the administration of topical or systemic antifungal agents and disinfectants [14], or upon incorporation of slow release antifungal/antimicrobial agents into denture base materials [15] were also proposed. Although antifungal drugs proved effective in relieving clinical signs and symptoms of DS, they are not without drawbacks. In fact, high rates of early post-treatment relapse and recurrence were reported [16], while prolonged therapeutic regimens or multiple cycles of treatment greatly enhance the risk of potential systemic adverse effects [17] and of induction of antifungal drug resistance in resident fungal strains [18], making the treatment of DS by their means challenging. In recent years the administration of specific probiotic preparations was investigated as a means to contrast oral colonization by Candida spp. in denture wearers both in the presence and in the absence of DS, although with contrasting results [19–22]. The present work was consequently designed to preliminarily evaluate if a probiotic preparation, containing Streptococcus salivarius strain K12 could prove effective in reducing clinical signs and symptoms of DS and in reducing oral colonization by C. albicans, and if the duration of clinical effects continued after the end of treatment.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Studied Subjects and Study Design Fifty adult human subjects of both sexes were enrolled for this study from a larger population of denture wearers attending or referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences of “Sapienza” University of Rome. Inclusion criteria were as follows: presence of at least one totally edentulous dental arch, presence of a full arch, well-fitting removable acrylic denture, presence of subjective discomfort/pain in relation to denture, and presence of clinical signs of DS. Exclusion criteria were as follows: use of adhesives for denture stabilization, use of antibiotics in the last 30 days, presence of systemic diseases influencing homeostasis of the oral mucosae (i.e., lupus erythematosus, lichen planus, xerostomia) or significantly influencing immunity (malignancies, transplantations requiring immunosuppressive therapy). Upon enrollment in the study patients were informed of the scope of the study and were asked to sign an informed consent in accordance with criteria of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Policlinico Umberto I of Rome (n. 4790) and registered with the trial identification number ISRCTN14751782. A written informed consent form was signed by all the patients before their enrollment. All patients were instructed to perform scrupulous mechanic denture and oral hygiene daily. More precisely they were instructed to clean the denture with a dedicated brush under a constant flux of tap water and to carefully brush their teeth, the oral mucosae and tongue with their toothbrush. They were also instructed to refrain from wearing the denture 24 h a day and invited not to use oral rinses containing antimicrobial substances. Patients enrolled in the study were subjected to baseline (T-0) clinical evaluation and microbiological sampling and randomly assigned to either the experimental group (25 subjects) or to the control group (25 subjects). Patients assigned to the experimental group (EXP) were invited to perform mechanic denture and oral hygiene as previously explained, and to Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 3 of 10
Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 10 take 1 tablet of Bactoblis® (Pharmaextracta Spa, Pontenure, Piacenza, Italy), containing 109 CFU of the 9 probioticcontaining strain 10 CFUS. salivarius of the probioticK12 for strain 30 days S. salivarius in the evening, K12 for just 30 days before in goingthe evening, to sleep. just Patients before going were instructedto sleep. Patients to remove were the instructed denture to and remove allow the the denture tablet to and dissolve allow the in the tablet mouth, to dissolve and to in refrain the mouth, from drinkingand to refrain for the from next drinking 60 min. for the next 60 min. Patients assigned to to the the control control group group (CTR) (CTR) were were invited invited to perform to perform mechanic mechanic denture denture and andoral oralhygiene hygiene as previously as previously explained explained for 30 for days. 30 days.All subjects All subjects of both of groups both groupswere instructed were instructed not to wear not tothe wear denture the denturewhile sleeping while sleepingand to maintain and to maintain the denture the within denture a withindedicated a dedicated box during box the during night. the At night.the end At of the period end of of the 30 period days all of patients 30 days were all patients subjected were to a subjectedsecond (T-30) to a clinical second evaluation (T-30) clinical and evaluationmicrobiological and microbiological sampling, and sampling, further instructed and further to instructed reinstate toprevious reinstate oral previous and denture oral and hygiene denture hygienemeasures measures for the fornext the 30 next days. 30 days.At the At end the endof this of thisperiod period they they were were subjected subjected to to further further clinical evaluation (T-60)(T-60) (Figure(Figure 11).).
Figure 1. Experimental study design. Figure 1. Experimental study design. 2.2. Clinical Evaluation 2.2. Clinical Evaluation Clinical evaluation included recording of two subjective parameters and one objective index. SubjectiveClinical feeling evaluation of pain included in the oral recording mucosa and of two dryness subjective of the mouthparameters were recordedand one objective for each patient. index. AnswersSubjective were feeling recorded of pain as in presence the oral mucosa (1) or absence and dr (0).yness Each of the patient mouth was were inspected recorded by for an each experienced patient. clinicianAnswers in were order recorded to determine as presence the presence (1) or absence and extension (0). Each ofclinical patient signs was inspected of DS according by an experienced to Newton’s classificationclinician in order [23]. Thisto determine classification the of presence DS describes and threeextension steps ofof stomatitis clinical signs according of DS to diaccordingffusion and to intensityNewton’s of classification clinical signs [23]. of inflammation. This classification Grade of 1: DS presence describes of pin-pointthree steps hyperemic of stomatitis lesions according (localized to simplediffusion inflammation); and intensity grade of clinical 2: presence signs of diinflammation.ffuse erythema Grade involving 1: presence most of of the pin-point mucosa hyperemic contacting thelesions denture (localized (generalized simple simpleinflammation); inflammation); grade 2: grade presence 3: presence of diffuse of inflammationerythema involving associated most with of the a granularmucosa contacting surface of the the denture mucosa (generalized contacting the simple denture inflammation); (inflammatory grade papillary 3: presence hyperplasia). of inflammation associatedAll clinical with evaluationsa granular weresurface performed of the mucosa separately contacting by three the experienced denture (inflammatory clinicians (C.P., papillary D.D.N., andhyperplasia). L.T.), and calibrated to provide consistent determination of Newton’s class as follows: twenty All clinical evaluations were performed separately by three experienced clinicians (C.P., D.D.N., and L.T.), and calibrated to provide consistent determination of Newton’s class as follows: twenty Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 4 of 10 subjects were selected among those participating in the study. Each examiner independently evaluated and scored each subject; measures were repeated after 24 h on the same subjects. Values recorded by the three examiners at the same time were used to calculate inter-examiner reproducibility. Values recorded by each examiner at different times were used to calculate intra-examiner reproducibility. Inter- and intra-examiner reproducibility was measured through Cohen’s weighted kappa; values obtained suggest an almost perfect agreement among the three examiners [24].
2.3. Microbiological Samples Microbiological samples for detection and quantification of C. albicans cells were obtained from all patients at T0 and T30 by two methods [25]: (i) by streaking a cotton swab along the apex of the gingival process for a length of 30 mm in areas with signs of DS; the swab was then inserted in a sterile polystyrene tube containing 1 mL of Stuarts transport medium; (ii) by instructing each patient to remove the denture and to rinse vigorously with 10 mL of sterile physiologic saline for 1 min. The rinse was collected in a sterile 50 mL polypropylene tube. Samples were always stored on ice until further processing.
2.4. Quantification of Candida Albicans in Samples Tubes containing swabs for enumeration of C. albicans cells were vortexed for 1 min before transferring the transport medium to a sterile 1.5 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube. Samples were then centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4 C for 5 min; the supernatant was removed, and cellular pellets were × ◦ suspended in 1 mL of sterile physiologic saline. Tubes containing rinses were centrifuged at 10,000 g × at 4 ◦C for 5 min; the supernatant was then discarded, and pellets were suspended in 1 mL of sterile physiologic saline. Tenfold dilutions were prepared from all samples, and 0.1 mL of each sample and of its dilution was plated on BBL Chromagar Candida Medium (Becton Dikinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Following incubation for 48 h at 37 ◦C, plates were inspected and colonies of C. albicans (i.e., green colored colonies) were counted. The development of colonies with phenotypes typical of non-albicans Candida spp. was always recorded.
2.5. Statistical Analysis Differences in mean counts of C. albicans in the swab and rinse cultures between the study and control group at T0 and T30 were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. Differences in terms of DS according to the Newton’s class were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences between groups in the distribution of pain and dryness were compared using the Fisher’s exact test. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows. The significance level was set at p 0.05. ≤ 3. Results
3.1. Studied Population Fifty adult denture wearers of both sexes were selected for this study and randomly assigned to two groups of 25 subjects. The two groups were comparable for age (EXP mean age 74.3 3.8 years, ± age range 68–82, CTR mean age 73.1 3.6 years, age range 67–83, p = 0.26), and gender (males/females: ± EXP 13/12, CTR 11/14, p = 0.58) (Table 1). At T0 the EXP and CTR groups were comparable with respect to clinical parameters, and C. albicans counts. With respect to the degree of DS, as determined by Newton’s classification, at T0 the EXP group showed a mean score of 2.1 0.6, and the CTR group ± a mean score of 2.2 0.6 (p = 0.66). All patients in both groups suffered pain at T0, while 36% of ± patients of the EXP group suffered from dryness, as compared to 44% in the CTR group (p = 0.77). No significant differences were observed at T0 between groups in the mean C. albicans counts in the swab culture (191.2 CFU/mL in the EXP group vs. 183.8 in the CTR group, p = 0.63) and in the rinse culture (477.1 vs. 463.9, p = 0.64). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 5 of 10
Table 1. Main characteristics of patients enrolled in the study, divided according to treatment group.
Group Experimental Control Age (mean SD) 74.3 3.8 73.1 3.6 ± ± ± Age range 68–82 67–83 Gender (Males/Females) 13/12 11/14 Smokers a (%) 24 20 Diabetes b (%) 36 28 Arterial hypertension c (%) 64 52 a Only subjects smoking <10 cigarettes/day were enrolled in the study; b only subjects with diabetes in good control were enrolled in the study; c only patients under therapy and with arterial pressure level <140/90 mmHg were enrolled in the study.
3.2. Probiotic S. salivarius Improved Clinical Conditions Clinical parameters recorded for the two groups at T0, T30 and T60 are reported in Tables 1 and 2. Although careful mechanic denture and oral hygiene according to a standard protocol was able to significantly improve clinical conditions in the CTR group between T0 and T30, the adjunctive administration of the probiotic preparation Bactoblis® caused a significantly greater improvement of objective clinical conditions (Table 1) in the same time lapse. Moreover, when patients of both groups discontinued therapeutic regimens, and resumed their usual oral hygiene behavior for 30 days (T60), subjects of the EXP group showed further improvement of clinical conditions while those of the CTR group showed partial worsening (Table 2).
Table 2. Distribution of denture stomatitis (DS) (according to Newton’s classification) between the study and control groups at T0 (p = 0.665), T30 (p = 0.005) and T60 (p < 0.001).
Group Control Experimental Count Column N % Count Column N % Newton class at T0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2 8.0% 4 16.0% 2 17 68.0% 15 60.0% 3 6 24.0% 6 24.0% Newton class at T30 0 6 24.0% 15 60.0% 1 16 64.0% 10 40.0% 2 3 12.0% 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Newton class at T60 0 4 16.0% 18 72.0% 1 13 52.0% 7 28.0% 2 8 32.0% 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
With respect to the degree of DS, no significant difference was observed at T0, while differences were statistically significant at T30 (p = 0.005) and at T60 (p < 0.001), with DS being more severe in the CTR group (Table 1). All patients in both groups suffered pain at T0. At T30 7 out of 25 patients reported pain in the EXP group (28.0%) against 14 out of 25 in the CTR group (56.0%, p = 0.085). Differences in pain were significant at T60, with four (16.0%) patients reporting it in the EXP group against 17 in the CTR group (68.0%, p < 0.001, Table3). No significant differences in dryness of mouth were observed between groups at T0 (p = 0.77), T30 (p = 0.42), and T60 (p = 0.14, Table 3). The higher number of patients suffering from dryness at T30 and T60 in the CTR group can be explained by the higher starting number registered at T0. No patient in the EXP group reported any adverse effect related to the assumption of Bactoblis®. Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 10
Appl. Sci.Table2020, 103. ,Distribution 3002 of pain and dryness between groups before treatment (T0), after 30 days of 6 of 10 treatment (T30) and after 30 days after treatment had stopped (T60).
Table 3. Distribution of pain and dryness between groupsGroup before treatment (T0), after 30 days of treatment (T30) and after 30 days after treatmentControl had stopped (T60). Experimental Count Column N % Count Column N % Group Pain T0 No 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Yes 25 Control100.0% 25 Experimental100.0% Pain T30 No 11 Count Column44.0% N % Count18 Column72.0% N % Pain T0 Yes No 14 056.0% 0.0% 07 0.0%28.0% Yes 25 100.0% 25 100.0% Pain T60Pain T30 No No8 1132.0% 44.0% 2118 72.0%84.0% Yes Yes17 1468.0% 56.0% 74 28.0%16.0% Dryness T0Pain T60 No No14 856.0% 32.0% 1621 84.0%64.0% Yes 17 68.0% 4 16.0% Dryness T0Yes No11 1444.0% 56.0% 169 64.0%36.0% Dryness T30 No Yes20 1180.0% 44.0% 239 36.0%92.0% Dryness T30Yes No5 2020.0% 80.0% 232 92.0%8.0% Yes 5 20.0% 2 8.0% DrynessDryness T60 T60No No18 1872.0% 72.0% 23 92.0%92.0% Yes Yes7 728.0% 28.0% 2 8.0%8.0%
3.3. Probiotic Probiotic S. S. salivarius salivarius Reduced C. albicans Counts Counts of C. albicans were obtained from all patients at T0 and T30 by collecting two different different samples, a swab streaked for a length of 30 mm on the diseased mucosa underlying the denture and an oral rinse with 10 mL of sterile physiologic sali saline.ne. As As expected expected from from previous reports [25], [25], counts obtained from oral rinses were, on average, 2.5 times higher than thosethose obtainedobtained fromfrom swabs.swabs. While countscounts ofofC. C. albicans albicansobtained obtained at at T0 T0 from from samples samples of patients of patients of both of both the EXP the andEXP CTR and group CTR groupwere comparable, were comparable, analysis analysis of both swabof both and swab rinse samplesand rinse showed samples that showed the EXP that group the underwent EXP group a underwentreduction of a aboutreduction 60% of of aboutC. albicans 60% ofcounts C. albicans between counts T0 between and T30, T0 whereas and T30, the whereas reduction the in reduction the CTR ingroup, the CTR although group, significant, although significant, was only about was only 20% about (Figure 20%2). (Figure Colonies 2). with Colonies phenotypes with phenotypes typical of typicalnon-albicans of non- Candidaalbicansspp. Candida were spp. observed werein observed many cases in many but their cases counts but their were counts always were low always so that theylow sowere that considered they wereas considered not relevant as not for therelevant purposes for the of thepurposes study. of the study.
Figure 2. Candida albicansalbicans countscounts before before (T0) (T0) and and after after 30 30 days days treatment treatment regimens regimens (T30) (T30) with with (EXP) (EXP) and ® andwithout without (CTR) (CTR) probiotic probioticS. salivarius S. salivariusBLIS K12.BLISC.®K12. albicans C. albicanscounts obtainedcounts obtained by two distinct by two sampling distinct samplingprocedures procedures (swab and (swab rinse) areand represented rinse) are represente in the plotd and in reportedthe plot and in the reported explanatory in the table explanatory as colony forming units/ml (CFU/mL) means ( standard deviation). Significance of differences between single table as colony forming units/ml (CFU/mL)± means (±standard deviation). Significance of differences groups of data was calculated by the Student T test and is reported in the table as values of P. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 7 of 10
4. Discussion The present work was designed to preliminarily evaluate the potential effectiveness of combining scrupulous oral and denture hygiene with the administration of a probiotic preparation, containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 for the treatment of DS in patients wearing well-fitting full arch dentures. DS is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of the oral mucosal areas covered by the denture, in which an overgrowth of C. albicans and other opportunistic fungal species normally found in the oral biofilm, is believed to play a key etiologic role [5,6,26]. DS is the cause of multiple visits to the dental office for pain, sensation of dryness of the mouth, discomfort and denture mobilization and is also believed to enhance the risk of pulmonary and other systemic infections [10–12]. C. albicans, as many other fungal species, is a normal colonizer of mucosal surfaces including the oral mucosa [8], although in healthy subjects its counts are low. Some clinical conditions, as for example the presence of acrylic bases of removable prostheses and a diminished hygienic skill favored by ageing, are known to promote a significant overgrowth of resident fungal species and of C. albicans in particular, thus promoting the onset of DS [6–8,16]. The availability of effective preventative and therapeutic approaches for DS is consequently important. As a direct consequence of the multifactorial nature of DS, its treatment may rely on different approaches, including examination and correction of the denture base, discontinuation of nocturnal wearing of the denture, improvement of oral and denture hygiene measures [13]. Other strategies could be the administration of topical or systemic antifungal agents and disinfectants [14], or the incorporation of slow release antifungal/antimicrobial agents into denture base materials [15]. Despite its multifactorial etiology, the main etiological factor and the principal cause of extensive inflammation observed in DS is certainly the colonization of the denture base and of the underlying mucosa by Candida spp. and other fungal species [26]. Consequently, the administration of antifungal drugs is highly effective in relieving clinical signs and symptoms of DS. Nevertheless, the use of such drugs is not without drawbacks, since short term treatments are affected by high rates of early post-treatment relapse and recurrence [16]. Furthermore, prolonged or repeated therapeutic regimens enhance the risk of systemic adverse effects [17] and are likely to induce antifungal drug resistance in resident fungal strains [18]. It is well known that the administration of probiotics can be beneficial for patients suffering for mucosal candidiasis [27]. Previous studies have already shown that the assumption of some, but not all [22], probiotic preparations can reduce symptoms of DS [19–21], and Candida colonization levels in healthy denture wearers [19,20] and in subjects affected by DS [21]. However, common probiotic strains of the genus Lactobacillus have few chances to exert prolonged protective activity since they are not adapted to be oral colonizers. To overcome this limitation, studies were recently performed to isolate probiotic Lactobacillus strains directly from the oral cavity [28]. As an alternative strategy, probiotic strains were searched among normal pioneer colonizers of the oral cavity as S. salivarius [29]. S. salivarius strain K12 is considered as the prototype probiotic strain of this species. It was originally selected for its ability to inhibit Streptococcus pyogens, but it was subsequently shown to possess several other interesting activities, including inhibitory activity on Candida spp. [29,30]. Although data on this matter are still incomplete, several probiotic strains were shown to be able to inhibit biofilm growth, and expression of virulence and resistance genes of C. albicans [20,30–33]. These considerations prompted us to preliminarily evaluate the effectiveness of a probiotic preparation containing S. salivarius strain K12 in the treatment of DS. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were designed to minimize the influence of factors other than microbial dysbiosis due to inadequate oral hygiene on the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of DS. Subjects wearing not-well-fitting dentures were excluded, as well as subjects affected by diseases altering immunity and oral homeostasis. In the selection of patients, attention was paid to minimize the possible interference of potential confounders. Consequently, in addition to the rigid application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, attention was dedicated to include only patients in apparent good conditions: diabetic patients with high glycemic levels, patients with arterial hypertension not well controlled by drugs (i.e., pressure levels > 140/90 mmHg) Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 8 of 10 and patients smoking >10 cigarettes/day were excluded from the study. Nevertheless diabetes, arterial hypertension and smoking were not included as variables in the statistical analysis. Due to the preliminarily nature of this study, the CTR group was not designed to receive a placebo; this could have influenced perception of subjective symptoms between the two groups of patients. As expected, our experimental data confirm that, in the absence of repeated trauma due to inadequacy of the denture base or too prolonged denture wearing, improvement of the oral and denture hygiene procedure reduces clinical signs and symptoms of DS and reduces oral colonization by C. albicans [13,14]. Moreover, data show that the effectiveness of oral and denture hygiene alone is limited in time. In fact, when (after T30) patients of the CTR group were invited to resume their previous habits with the dentures, their clinical conditions worsened significantly. Although microbiological samples were not analyzed at T60, it can be considered plausible, in accordance with data from the literature [25], that clinical relapse was paralleled by an increase in oral C. albicans counts. Experimental data show that when improved oral and denture hygiene procedures were flanked by the administration of a preparation of the probiotic strain S. salivarius K12, a significantly greater improvement of clinical conditions and a higher reduction of oral C. albicans counts were obtained in the EXP group at T30. Interestingly and unexpectedly, clinical evaluations performed at T60, when patients of the EXP group had discontinued treatment for 30 days and had resumed previous oral and denture hygiene habits, revealed a further improvement of clinical conditions, as opposed to the partial relapse observed in the CTR group. These data suggest that S. salivarius K12 could be able to colonize oral mucosa at least for some weeks after discontinuation of treatment and consequently exhibit a prolonged anti-Candida action. Unfortunately, microbiological sampling was not planned for T60 and consequently this aspect will deserve future further investigations. A prolonged presence of the probiotic strain would be in accordance with the well-known role of S. salivarius as a pioneer colonizer of the human oral cavity [29]. The effective duration of oral colonization by S. salivarius K12 after 30 days of treatment and the consequent duration of its anti-Candida activity will be the object of future investigations using specific molecular methods that were recently made available [34]. Future studies will also be necessary to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the clinical and microbiological effects of S. salivarius K12 on DS described in this paper.
5. Conclusions The present work was designed to preliminarily evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of a probiotic preparation, containing S. salivarius K12, in Candida albicans-positive subjects affected by DS, and the duration of clinical effects. Data presented in this paper confirm that, at least in subjects wearing well-fitting full-arch dentures and affected by DS, reinforcement of oral and denture hygiene procedures coupled with administration of a probiotic preparation containing S. salivarius K12 is effective in reducing symptoms and clinical signs of DS, and significantly reduces oral colonization by C. albicans. The clinical effects associated with the administration of S. salivarius K12 persist for at least 30 days after discontinuation of treatment. The tested probiotic preparation could consequently prove as a valid and safe aid in combination with the improvement of oral and denture hygiene measures for the treatment of DS.
Author Contributions: C.P., A.P. and L.T. were responsible for study design, C.P., L.T. and D.D.N. performed clinical examinations and collected microbiological samples, C.P. performed microbiological analyses, F.D.N. performed statistical analyses, all authors analyzed and discussed data, and cooperated at writing the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Acknowledgments: Pharmaextracta Spa contributed by supplying patients with the amounts of BactoBlis necessary for the study. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Pharmaextracta Spa had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, and in the writing of the manuscript. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 9 of 10
References
1. Bongaarts, J. Human population growth and the demographic transition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2985–2990. [CrossRef][PubMed] 2. Griffin, S.O.; Jones, J.A.; Brunson, D.; Griffin, P.M.; Bailey, W.D. Burden of Oral Disease Among Older Adults and Implications for Public Health Priorities. Am. J. Public Health 2012, 102, 411–418. [CrossRef][PubMed] 3. Meurman, J.H.; Hämäläinen, P. Oral health and morbidity-implications of oral infections on the elderly. Gerodontology 2006, 23, 3–16. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Kassebaum, N.; Bernabe, E.; Dahiya, M.; Bhandari, B.; Murray, C.; Marcenes, W. Global Burden of Severe Tooth Loss. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 20S–28S. [CrossRef][PubMed] 5. Gendreau, L.; Loewy, Z.G. Epidemiology and Etiology of Denture Stomatitis. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 20, 251–260. [CrossRef] 6. Gauch, L.M.R.; Pedrosa, S.S.; Silveira-Gomes, F.; Esteves, R.A.; Marques-Da-Silva, S.H. Isolation of Candida spp. from denture-related stomatitis in Pará, Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017, 49, 148–151. [CrossRef] 7. Chevalier, M.; Ranque, S.; Precheur, I. Oral fungal-bacterial biofilm models in vitro: A review. Med. Mycol. 2017, 56, 653–667. [CrossRef] 8. Morales, D.; Hogan, D.A. Candida albicans Interactions with Bacteria in the Context of Human Health and Disease. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000886. [CrossRef] 9. Shirtliff, M.; Peters, B.M.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Cross-kingdom interactions: Candida albicans and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 299, 1–8. [CrossRef] 10. Gendron, R.; Grenier, D.; Maheu-Robert, L.-F. The oral cavity as a reservoir of bacterial pathogens for focal infections. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 897–906. [CrossRef] 11. O’Donnell, L.E.; Smith, K.; Williams, C.; Nile, C.J.; Lappin, D.F.; Bradshaw, D.; Lambert, M.; Robertson, D.; Bagg, J.; Hannah, V.; et al. Dentures are a Reservoir for Respiratory Pathogens. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 25, 99–104. [CrossRef][PubMed] 12. Coulthwaite, L.; Verran, J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2007, 64, 180–189. [CrossRef][PubMed] 13. Hasan, S.; Kuldeep; Shamimul, H. Denture Stomatitis: A Literature Review. J. Orofac. Health Sci. 2015, 6, 65. [CrossRef] 14. Hilgert, J.B.; Giordani, J.M.D.A.; De Souza, R.F.; Wendland, E.M.; D’Avila, O.P.; Hugo, F.N. Interventions for the Management of Denture Stomatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016, 64, 2539–2545. [CrossRef][PubMed] 15. Bueno, M.; Urban, V.; Barbério, G.; Da Silva, W.J.; Porto, V.; Pinto, L.; Neppelenbroek, K. Effect of antimicrobial agents incorporated into resilient denture relines on the Candida albicans biofilm. Oral Dis. 2013, 21, 57–65. [CrossRef][PubMed] 16. Ramage, G.; Tomsett, K.; Wickes, B.L.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L.; Redding, S.W. Denture stomatitis: A role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2004, 98, 53–59. [CrossRef][PubMed] 17. Perfect, J.R.; Lindsay, M.H.; Perfect, J.R.; Drew, R.H. Adverse Drug Reactions to Systemic Antifungals. Drug Saf. 1992, 7, 323–363. [CrossRef] 18. White, T.C.; Marr, K.A.; Bowden, R.A. Clinical, Cellular, and Molecular Factors That Contribute to Antifungal Drug Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 382–402. [CrossRef] 19. Ishikawa, K.; Mayer, M.P.A.; Miyazima, T.Y.; Matsubara, V.H.; Silva, E.G.; Paula, C.R.; Campos, T.T.; Nakamae, A. A Multispecies Probiotic Reduces Oral Candida Colonization in Denture Wearers. J. Prosthodont. 2014, 24, 194–199. [CrossRef] 20. Song, Y.-G.; Lee, S.-H. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus casei on Candida biofilm of denture surface. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 76, 1–6. [CrossRef] 21. Lee, X.; Vergara, C.; Lozano, C.P. Severity of Candida-associated denture stomatitis is improved in institutionalized elders who consume Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1. Aust. Dent. J. 2019, 64, 229–236. [CrossRef][PubMed] 22. Sutula, J.; Coulthwaite, L.; Thomas, L.; Verran, J. The effect of a commercial probiotic drink on oral microbiota in healthy complete denture wearers. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2012, 23, 175. [CrossRef] 23. Newton, A.V. Denture sore mouth. A possible etiology. Br. Dent. J. 1962, 112, 357–360. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3002 10 of 10
24. Koch, J.R.L.G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159. [CrossRef] 25. Tooyama, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Hayashi, K.; Kurashina, K.; Kurita, H.; Uchida, M.; Kasuga, E.; Honda, T. Candida concentrations determined following concentrated oral rinse culture reflect clinical oral signs. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 150. [CrossRef][PubMed] 26. Zomorodian, K.; Haghighi, N.N.; Rajaee, N.; Pakshir, K.; Tarazooie, B.; Vojdani, M.; Sedaghat, F.; Vosoghi, M.; Vossoughi, M. Assessment ofCandidaspecies colonization and denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers. Med. Mycol. 2011, 49, 208–211. [CrossRef] 27. Salazar, S.B.; Simões, R.S.; Pedro, N.A.; Pinheiro, M.J.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N.; Mira, N.P. An Overview on Conventional and Non-Conventional Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Candidiasis and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms in Clinical Strains. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 23. [CrossRef] 28. Rossoni, R.D.; De Barros, P.P.; De Alvarenga, J.A.; Ribeiro, F.D.C.; Velloso, M.D.S.; Fuchs, B.B.; Mylonakis, E.; Jorge, A.O.C.; Junqueira, J.C. Antifungal activity of clinical Lactobacillus strains against Candida albicans biofilms: Identification of potential probiotic candidates to prevent oral candidiasis. Biofouling 2018, 34, 212–225. [CrossRef] 29. Wescombe, P.A.; Hale, J.D.; Heng, N.C.; Tagg, J.R. Developing oral probiotics fromStreptococcus salivarius. Futur. Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1355–1371. [CrossRef] 30. Hu, L.; Mao, Q.; Zhou, P.; Lv, X.; Hua, H.; Yan, Z. Effects of Streptococcus salivarius K12 with nystatin on oral candidiasis—RCT. Oral Dis. 2019, 25, 1573–1580. [CrossRef] 31. Aarti, C.; Ameer, K.; Varghese, R.; Arasu, M.V.; Agastian, P.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Ilavenil, S.; Choi, K.C. In vitro investigation on probiotic, anti-Candida, and antibiofilm properties of Lactobacillus pentosus strain LAP1. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 89, 99–106. [CrossRef][PubMed] 32. Kim, H.; Kang, S.-S. Antifungal activities against Candida albicans, of cell-free supernatants obtained from probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici HW01. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 99, 113–119. [CrossRef][PubMed] 33. Oliveira, V.; Dos Santos, S.S.F.; Silva, C.; Jorge, A.; Leão, M. Lactobacillus is able to alter the virulence and the sensitivity profile of Candida albicans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 1737–1744. [CrossRef][PubMed] 34. Reid, P.; Heng, N.C.; Hale, J.D.; Krishnan, D.; Crane, J.; Tagg, J.R.; Milne, T.J. A TaqMan™-based quantitative PCR screening assay for the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 based on the specific detection of its megaplasmid-associated salivaricin B locus. J. Microbiol. Methods 2020, 170, 105837. [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Nutrafoods (2019) 2:80-88. DOI 10.17470/NF-019-0011 Review
Streptococcus salivarius K12 in pharyngotonsillitis and acute otitis media – a meta-analysis
Abstract
The oral administration of Streptococcus salivarius K12 represents a valid solution for the prevention of pharyngitis or pharyngotonsillitis, of bacterial or viral origin, and/or acute otitis media. In particular, this could be an interesting alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with re- lapse or disease recurrence. In this regard, the studies published in the scientific iter ture re i ited nd thus it s of interest to ro ide meta-analysis in order to analyze in more detail the results obtained in this rese rch fie d or the et n sis c inic studies ere se ected s identified throu h PubMed, which examined the relationship between the use of formula- tions based on Streptococcus salivarius K12 and the number of cases or episodes of pharyngitis or pharyngotonsillitis, of bacterial or viral origin, and acute otitis media in children and adults. The effect size (ES) was cal- cu ted ccordin to ohen usin the fi ed effects ode fixed effects). e en studies et the redefined inc usion criteri nd the ere Alexander Bertuccioli 1* included in the meta-analysis. ES values equal to -1.40 [-1.67; -1.13] and Marco Rocchi 1 ere o t ined for the effect of Streptococcus salivarius Ilaria Morganti 1 K12 on the prevention of pharyngitis and acute otitis media, respectively. Giorgia Vici 2 oth ues ere tr ns ted into i effect ccordin to ohen s sc e Marco Gervasi 1 re t ent sed on this str in is effecti e for oth the re ention of Stefano Amatori 1 pharyngitis and acute otitis media. In addition, it is further revealed that Davide Sisti 1 the str in is ore effecti e in the re ention of h r n itis It is desirable that further clinical investigation continues to expand and 1 Department of Biomolecular update the meta-analysis work and to recommend the use of the strain as Sciences,University of Urbino “Carlo Bo” a useful prophylactic tool to reduce the events of pharyngotonsillitis and
2 School of Bioscience and Veterinary acute otitis media. Medicine, University of Camerino
Keywords: BLIS K12, Streptococcus salivarius K12, pharyngotonsillitis, *Corresponding author: Alexander Bertuccioli oral probiotics [email protected]
80 Streptococcus salivarius K12 in pharyngotonsillitis and acute otitis media – a meta-analysis
we could assess more thoroughly the results Introduction o t ined in this rese rch fie d co rin the resu ts differenti for h r n itis nd Streptococcus salivarius K12 is a strain bacterial infections of the ear. isolated from a New Zealand child [1]. It is capable of producing salivaricin A2 and salivaricin B, molecules belonging to the lantibiotics [2] f i e to counter ct effecti e in itro the Materials and methods growth of S. pyogenes [3], in addition to inhibiting he studies ere sourced fro scientific the growth of other pathogens including and biomedical journals and through the use Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis of the PubMed database. To be included in the and S. pneumoniae, which are all potentially meta-analysis, the studies had to meet the fol- involved in the aetiopathogenesis of acute lowing inclusion criteria: (a) clinical trials; (b) otitis media (AOM) [4], and pharyngotonsillitis [5]. parallel studies; or (c) historical control studies; The K12 strain proved to also have the ability d studies in hich the effecti eness of sic to inhibit the proliferation of Micrococcus luteus, S. anginosus, Eubacterium saburreum and formulations of Streptococcus salivarius K12 Micromonas micros, involved in the production ATCC BAA-1024 was assessed; (e) studies that of volatile sulfur compounds implicated in reported the number of cases or episodes of halitosis development [6, 7]. Jamali et al [8] pharyngitis or pharyngotonsillitis of bacterial or showed that probiotic K12 therapy following viral infection and/or AOM; (f) studies in which oral disinfection with chlorhexidine may reduce paediatric patients or adults were enrolled. the severity of halitosis over longer periods. t first the inc usion of e ords such s The strain also appears to be capable of antiviral "BLIS K12", "Streptococcus salivarius K12", "pro- actions, mainly attributed to an ability to biotic Streptococcus salivarius K12" and "bacte- incre se the e e s of s i r interferon nd riocin-like inhibitory substances Streptococcus to reduce interleukin (IL)-8 release, while leaving salivarius K12" produced a number of records the re e se of or tu or necrosis f ctor equal to 103 publications; after eliminating unaltered [4]. K12 also exhibited potential duplicates, this was reduced to 43, of which e c c nd s fet s n d u nt in tre tin 28 were screened articles. Finally, there was a oral candidiasis by enhancing mycological total of 21 studies excluded, while seven were cure and shortening the treatment course of included in the meta-analysis. Although one conventional antifungal therapy [9]. Colonization stud co ied ith the redefined inc usion has been demonstrated in the human model criteria [14] it s not inc uded in the fin u n- from the third day of treatment at the level of titative analysis because of a characteristic that the nasopharynx and adenoids [10], persisting differed si nific nt et een tre ted su ects up to 32 days after discontinuation [11], and a and controls. ood o er s fet rofi e in ni s [12] and More precisely, children diagnosed with humans [13] has been reported. Several clinical recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis (mean > studies have been conducted to investigate the three episodes of pharyngotonsillitis during potential of the K12 strain in the prevention of the year before the study) were included in the pharyngitis, pharyngotonsillitis and/or AOM of treatment group, while children without a diag- bacterial or viral origin. The aim of this work nosis of recurrent disease were enrolled in the was to carry out a meta-analysis through which control group.
81 Nutrafoods (2019) 2:80-88. DOI 10.17470/NF-019-0011
In Fig. 1 the flo di r or inc uded in the fin n sis [15]. flo ch rt is de icted this is n instru ent The extraction and processing of data from that allows documentation of all stages for the individual studies then took place (Table 1). se ection nd identific tion of studies to e
PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram
n° of records identified through n° of further records identified database research (n=103) through other sources (n=0)
cation fi
nt i
Id e
n° of records after duplicate elimination (n=43)
ee ning
n° of records subjected to n° of records excluded Scr screening (n=28) (n=14)
n° of full-text articles n° of full-text articles excluded evaluated for their (n=6) because they do not
eligibility (n=14) adhere to inclusion criteria
Eligibility
n° of studies included in the qualitative synthesis (n=8)
n° of studies included in
the quantitative synthesis In clusion (meta-analysis) (n=7)
Figure 1 heFigure 1 The flo PRISMA di r flow ofdiagram the iter ture of the lit re tederature to related to BLIS hich K12 s which e ined was examined in order toin de e o the meta-analysisorder work to develop the meta-analysis work