The Multiple Roles of Scottish Woodlands
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Roots for Further Growth
ROOTS FOR AN ECONOMIC STRATEGY FOR SCOTLAND’S FURTHER FOREST & TIMBER TECHNOLOGIES SECTOR TO GROWTH 2030. GROWING SCOTLAND’S WOOD-BASED BIOECONOMY THROUGH INVESTMENT & INNOVATION ROOTS FOR FURTHER GROWTH GROWING SCOTLAND’S WOOD-BASED BIOECONOMY THROUGH INVESTMENT & INNOVATION 01 03 Foreword 05 Executive Summary 07 1. Introduction 11 2. What We Have Achieved So Far. 14 3. Our Vision 21 4. Strategic Priorities 23 Maximising the Economic Outputs of Scotland’s Forest & Fibre Resource 26 Improving the Safety & Efficiency of the Wood Fibre Supply Chain 27 Expanding Our Markets & Adding Value 31 Developing a Workforce with Skills for the Future 32 Understanding and Communicating the Forest & Wood-based Industries Contribution to Scotland’s Economy 33 5. Action Plan for 2019-2021 02 FOREWORD I am delighted to endorse “Roots for Further Growth”, This sector has invested heavily over the last 10 years an ambitious and forward thinking strategy for inclusive to achieve world class wood processing facilities and economic growth in Scotland’s Forest and Timber has created additional jobs in response to forecasts of Technologies sector. increased wood fibre availability until 2030. The Scottish Government has a current annual target of 10,000 ha This is a sector that spans from tree nurseries, growing of new woodland which is set to increase in stages to productive sustainably managed forests, forest tourism, 15,000 ha a year by 2024-2025. This will not only increase timber harvesting, transport, downstream wood sequestered carbon but provide the sector with additional processing, primary manufacturing and woody biomass wood fibre feedstock for further growth beyond 2030. -
Woodland Trust – Russ Jobson
Woodland Trust Scotland Who we are and what we do 1 The Woodland Trust The UK's largest woodland conservation charity We've over 500,000 members and supporters and more than 1,000 sites, covering over 26,000 hectares, UK wide. We protect and campaign on behalf of this country’s woods, plant trees, and restore ancient woodland for the benefit of wildlife and people. Our vision is a UK rich in native woods and trees, for people and wildlife. A UK rich in native woods and trees, for people and wildlife Protect woodland - fighting to protect native woodland especially irreplaceable ancient woodland, which is under threat from tree diseases, climate change and development, believing that there should be no further loss of ancient woodland for any reason. Restore woodland - leading the restoration of ancient woodland and the re-creation of native wooded landscapes, believing that all damaged ancient woodland should be restored. Create woodland - championing the need for native woodland expansion to double the area of native woodland we have now. Native Woodland Creation Woodland Cover Forest Research estimates area of woodland in the UK on 31 March 2019 is: 3.19 million ha - 13% of the total land area in the UK, Of this 1, 457, 000ha (46%) is in Scotland. Equates 1, 072, 000ha (73.5%) conifer 385, 000ha (26.5%) broadleaves. *The Native Woodland Survey of Scotland estimated that there was 311,153ha of native woodland This equated to 22.5% of the total woodland area or 4.0% of the land area of Scotland. -
Policy Briefing
Policy Briefing Forestry policy and carbon sequestration in Scotland Synopsis LINK believes that carbon sequestration should not be a primary driver of forestry policy, management of the National Forest Estate, and grant spend in Scotland. Whilst we accept that trees do sequester carbon, and through this process can make a small contribution to combating climate change, primary focus should continue to be on ensuring delivery of multiple public benefits such as enhanced biodiversity, improved access and health opportunities, landscape and historical environment enhancement and rural economic development. LINK does not therefore support any shift in resources away from existing policy priorities towards support for ‘sequestration forestry’ per se. LINK calls for a substantial increase in Government spending on ‘climate change adaptation forestry’ as an urgent response to the threat climate change poses to Scotland’s landscapes and biodiversity. ‘Adaptation forestry’ may include initiatives such as the restoration and expansion of native and mixed woodland planting, forest habitat network development and facilitating a move towards low impact silvicultural systems. These objectives are consistent with the current Scottish Forestry Strategy and will also have important secondary carbon sequestration benefits. The limitations of carbon as a driver for forestry policy The science behind carbon sequestration is still developing but evidence to date suggests that even if amount of new planting in Scotland each year was doubled or quadrupled, the contribution of new woodlands to offsetting an estimated 20Mt of carbon emitted each year in Scotland will only ever be minimal1. This is a key reason why sequestration should not be a primary driver of forestry policy. -
Human Rights and the Work of the Scottish Land Commission
Human Rights and the Work of the Scottish Land Commission A discussion paper Dr Kirsteen Shields May 2018 LAND LINES A series of independent discussion papers on land reform issues Background to the ‘Land Lines’ discussion papers The Scottish Land Commission has commissioned a series of independent discussion papers on key land reform issues. These papers are intended to stimulate public debate and to inform the Commission’s longer term research priorities. The Commission is looking at human rights as it is inherent in Scotland’s framework for land reform and underpins our Strategic Plan and Programme of Work. This, the fifth paper in the Land Lines series, is looking at the opportunities provided by land reform for further realisation of economic, social and cultural human rights. The opinions expressed, and any errors, in the papers are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Commission. About the Author Dr Kirsteen Shields is a Lecturer in International Law at the University of Edinburgh’s Global Academy on Agriculture and Food Security and was recently a Fullbright / Royal Society of Edinburgh Scholar at the University of Berkeley, California. She has advised the Scottish Parliament on land reform and human rights and was the first Academic Fellow to the Scottish Parliament’s Information Centre (SPICe) in 2016. LAND LINES A series of independent discussion papers on land reform issues Summary Keywords Community; property rights; land; human rights; economic; social; cultural Background This report provides a primer on key human rights developments and obligations relevant to land reform. It explains the evolution in approach to human rights that is embodied in the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016 and it applies that approach to aspects of the Scottish Land Commission’s four strategic priorities. -
Scotland's Forestry Strategy 2019
Scotland’s Forestry Strategy 2019 - 29 Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report September 2018 Report prepared by: Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 13 1.1 Purpose of this Environmental Report ...................................................... 13 1.2 SEA activities to date ................................................................................ 13 2 The Forestry Strategy 2019-29 context and overview ............................... 15 2.1 Main policy principles / common themes................................................... 15 2.2 Forestry and Land Management (Scotland) Act (2018) ............................ 16 2.3 Outline and objectives of the Forestry Strategy 2019-29 .......................... 16 2.4 Sustainable Forest Management .............................................................. 18 2.5 The UK Forestry Standard – the benchmark for sustainable practice ....... 18 2.6 The Wider Regulatory Framework ............................................................ 19 2.7 Relationship with other relevant plans, programmes and strategies (PPS) ........................................................................................................ 21 3 Environmental baseline ............................................................................. 23 3.2 Environmental issues relevant to the strategy ........................................... 27 3.3 Likely evolution of the environment without implementation -
Inverness, Ross & Skye
Strategic Plan Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District Strategic Plan 2009-2013 Click here to begin Strategic plan 2009-2013 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 About Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District ........................................................................................6 Section one: strategic context .....................................................................................................13 Context ............................................................................................................................................................14 Strategic priorities for Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District .......................................................16 Forest policy context...................................................................................................................................18 Section two: how Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District contributes to the delivery of the scottish forestry strategy ....................................................................................19 Key theme one: climate change ..............................................................................................................21 Key theme two: timber ..............................................................................................................................25 Key theme three: business development .............................................................................................30 -
Spice Briefing Land Reform in Scotland 03 June 2015 15/28 Alasdair Reid
The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament Infor mation C entre l ogos. SPICe Briefing Land Reform in Scotland 03 June 2015 15/28 Alasdair Reid Clockwise from top: Isle of Gigha (Scottish Government 2012a); Integrated Landscape Buccleuch Estates (Scottish Land and Estates 2014a); Lambhill Stables and Forth and Clyde Canal, Glasgow (Lambhill Stables 2015). CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 SCOTLAND’S LAND ................................................................................................................................................ 4 WHAT IS LAND REFORM? ......................................................................................................................................... 5 LAND REFORM BEFORE SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION ............................................................................................... 6 LAND REFORM SINCE DEVOLUTION ...................................................................................................................... 8 LAND REFORM POLICY GROUP ........................................................................................................................... 8 LEGISLATION SINCE DEVOLUTION .................................................................................................................... -
Protected Landscapes: the United Kingdom Experience
.,•* \?/>i The United Kingdom Expenence Department of the COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION COMMISSION ENVIRONMENT FOR SCOTLAND NofChern ireianc •'; <- *. '•ri U M.r. , '^M :a'- ;i^'vV r*^- ^=^l\i \6-^S PROTECTED LANDSCAPES The United Kingdom Experience Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/protectedlandsca87poor PROTECTED LANDSCAPES The United Kingdom Experience Prepared by Duncan and Judy Poore for the Countryside Commission Countryside Commission for Scotland Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland and the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Published for the International Symposium on Protected Landscapes Lake District, United Kingdom 5-10 October 1987 * Published in 1987 as a contribution to ^^ \ the European Year of the Environment * W^O * and the Council of Europe's Campaign for the Countryside by Countryside Commission, Countryside Commission for Scotland, Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland and the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources © 1987 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Avenue du Mont-Blanc, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Additional copies available from: Countryside Commission Publications Despatch Department 19/23 Albert Road Manchester M19 2EQ, UK Price: £6.50 This publication is a companion volume to Protected Landscapes: Experience around the World to be published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, -
Celtic Lands and Identities: Global and Local Implications”
“Celtic lands and identities: Global and Local Implications” The 2018 John F. Roatch Global Lecture on Social Policy and Practice, Arizona State University, College of Public Service and Community Solutions Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 23 March, 2018 Professor Frank Rennie The concept of “Think global, act local” is frequently attributed to the work of Patrick Geddes, a Scottish biologist, sociologist, philanthropist and pioneering town planner. He was an early champion of working with the environment, rather than working against it. The concept has since been applied to a very wide range of societal issues, but for today, I would just like to focus on its implications for local and national identity, in the recognition of a sense of place, and in determining a sense of responsibility for that place. I would then like to look at the social implications of that heightened sense of local and national identity. There is a particular word in the Gaelic language of my homeland for which is difficult to give a direct translation into English. “Buntanas” expresses sense of belonging, now simply in the present, but the concept of a person or community of people belonging to a certain area of land, a communal sense of embeddedness, and rootedness through family lineage and history of a community who belong to a certain place. This is contradistinction to the more usual Western concept of the land belonging to an individual person, of people owning the land in its entirety. In the poetry of the late Norman MacCaig, he asks… Who possesses this landscape? – The man who bought it or I who am possessed by it? I want to return to this theme in a few minutes, for I think that our relationships with the land is at the heart of the Celtic relationship with land and place. -
Strategy Report and Recommendations from the 1 Million Acre Short Life Working Group
One Million Acres by 2020 Strategy report and recommendations from the 1 Million Acre Short Life Working Group December 2015 1 Contents 1. Why 1 million acres? What’s the case for action? ......................................................... 3 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 SLWG – remit & structure ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Evidence – benefits of CLO ............................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Benefits that are specific to community ownership and may not be realised through other forms of community management ......................................... 8 1.3.2 Benefits of community ownership for communities as landowners ....... 9 1.3.3 Benefits for the broader community ................................................................ 11 1.3.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 14 1.4 Definition – What do we mean by community land ownership? .................... 15 1.5 How much land is currently in community ownership? .................................... 16 2. Vision & Principles .................................................................................................................. 19 3. Policy Context ......................................................................................................................... -
Forest Enterprise Scotland Management Board
Forest Enterprise Scotland Management Board Forest Enterprise Scotland (FES) Management Board Meeting 26 January 2017 Attendees: Simon Hodge, Chief Executive Trefor Owen, Head of Land Management Michael Hymers, Head of Corporate Support Michael Ansell, Head of Estates Development Donna Mortimer, Head of Finance and Procurement Rosetta Forbes, Head of HR Scotland Alan Stevenson, Head of Community and Visitor Services Rhondda Salmond, Secretariat Apologies: Brent Meakin, Head of Business Services Others: Liz Walker (Items 6, 7 & 8) Alison Grant (Item 8) Jo Ellis (Item 8) 1. Minutes of last Meeting 20 Dec 2016 The Board agreed that the record of 20 Dec 2016 was held to be a true and fair record of the meeting. 2. Action Points and Matters Arising Ref: Action Who Target Date 11/02 Provide an update on investigations in to the BM & DM 17 March Depreciation Review. 2017 12/04 Bring a further developed Built Asset Management BM 17 March Strategy to FESMB in the new year. 2017 12/05 Consider how rationalisation income can best be used BM 17 March towards buildings or fleet, and present proposals to 2017 the FESMB 01/01 Nicol Sinclair to contact Business Services leads in NS 3 Feb 2017 covering for Brent’s period of absence. 02/01 Map dependencies between programmes with links to LW 17 march Corporate Development Programme 2017 03/01 Liaise with guest speakers regarding final MH 27 Jan arrangements for Team Leaders Meeting 2017 Action Points: 10/07, 11/03, 11/09, 11/10, 11/11, 12/01, 12/02, 12/03, 12/06 and 12/07 are discharged. -
What Alternative Tree Species Can We Grow in Western Britain? 85 Years of Evidence from the Kilmun Forest Garden
Research By W.L. Mason, F. MacDonald, M. Parratt and J.P. McLean What alternative tree species can we grow in western Britain? 85 years of evidence from the Kilmun Forest Garden Summary use in diversifying spruce dominated Nearly 300 tree species have been planted forests in western Britain. planted at Kilmun Forest Garden in Argyll since 1930, mostly in small plots Introduction allowing the collective performance of Recent years have seen increasing an individual species to be evaluated. awareness of the potential impacts of Results from the mid-1990s showed that both projected climate change and a about 60 species had formed productive range of pests and diseases upon the closed canopy stands, with a number of long-term sustainability of British forests conifers all showing health and potential (Read et al, 2009). One concern is the productivity equivalent to that of Sitka low numbers of species in our forests, spruce, the major species grown in the for example in 2005 around 55% of UK forests of western Britain. Since 2000, forests were single species stands (Forest there has been increased interest in the Europe, 2011). In addition, the British collection at Kilmun, partly because timber industry is dependent on very few it allows the comparison of long-term species with Sitka and Norway spruce growth of a wide range of species at accounting for over 55% of softwood a time when species diversification is timber production in 2012, a figure being encouraged as a means of adapting projected to increase to nearly 70% forests to climate change. Accordingly, by 2030 (Forestry Commission, 2014).