DOCSLIB.ORG

Holder % of CSO Market Value (USD) 1 Musk, Elon R. (Co-Founder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holder % of CSO Market Value (USD) 1 Musk, Elon R. (Co-Founder # Holder % Of CSO Market Value (USD) 1 Musk, Elon R. (Co-Founder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Product Architect) 23.075 7,015.6 2 Fidelity Investments 9.436 2,868.9 3 Kohler, Herbert (Former Director) 3.971 1,207.2 4 Daimler AG (XTRA:DAI) 3.971 1,207.2 5 T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NasdaqGS:TROW) 3.611 1,097.9 6 Baillie Gifford & Co. 3.465 1,053.5 7 Capital Research and Management Company 3.294 1,001.6 8 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC 2.97 903.0 9 The Vanguard Group, Inc. 2.892 879.3 10 Jennison Associates LLC 2.824 858.6 11 BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) 2.591 787.7 12 Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. 2.549 774.9 13 BNP Paribas Arbitrage Sa, Asset Management Arm 1.975 600.5 14 Goldman Sachs Group, Investment Banking and Securities Investments 1.527 464.4 15 Invesco Ltd. (NYSE:IVZ) 1.34 407.4 16 Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Asset Management Arm 1.317 400.4 17 JPMorgan Asset Management Holdings Inc. 1.202 365.5 18 State Street Global Advisors, Inc. 1.172 356.5 19 PRIMECAP Management Company 1.094 332.6 20 Allianz Global Investors AG 1.008 306.6 21 Zevenbergen Capital Investments LLC 0.95 288.9 22 American Century Investment Management Inc. 0.807 245.5 23 Gilder Gagnon Howe & Co. LLC 0.655 199.0 24 Andor Capital Management, L.L.C. 0.653 198.4 25 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association College Retirement Equities Fund 0.606 184.1 26 Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments 0.596 181.2 27 HHR Asset Management, LLC 0.571 173.5 28 Coatue Management, L.L.C. 0.556 169.1 29 Susquehanna International Group, LLP, Asset Management Arm 0.553 168.0 30 Northern Trust Global Investments 0.525 159.6 31 Norges Bank Investment Management 0.412 125.2 32 INTECH Investment Management LLC 0.41 124.8 33 Deutsche Bank, Private Banking and Investment Banking Investments 0.41 124.7 34 Blue Ridge Capital, L.L.C. 0.408 124.0 35 Putnam LLC 0.36 109.3 36 Managed Account Advisors LLC 0.358 108.9 37 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. 0.326 99.2 38 Highfields Capital Management, LP 0.326 99.2 39 Geode Capital Management, LLC 0.325 98.7 40 Michigan Department of Treasury, Bureau of Investments 0.321 97.6 41 UBS Global Asset Management 0.319 97.0 42 Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co., Ltd. 0.299 90.9 43 Tiger Management Corp 0.282 85.6 44 GCIC Ltd 0.279 84.7 Gracias J.D., Antonio J. (Lead Independent Director, Member of Audit Committee, Member of 0.272 82.6 Compensation Committee and Member of Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee) 45 46 Bridger Management, LLC 0.245 74.4 47 California Public Employees' Retirement System 0.186 56.6 48 TOBAM 0.178 54.2 49 First Trust Advisors L.P. 0.173 52.5 50 Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management Co., Ltd. 0.172 52.2 51 The Bank of New York Mellon Corp, Private Banking & Securities Investments 0.17 51.7 52 Bolton LLC 0.164 49.8 53 Societe Generale, Securities Investments 0.157 47.7 54 Transamerica Asset Management, Inc. 0.148 45.0 55 Cupps Capital Management, LLC 0.145 44.1 56 Musk, Kimbal (Director) 0.143 43.5 57 Capital Fund Management S.A. 0.138 42.0 58 AXA Investment Managers S.A. 0.137 41.7 59 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP 0.13 39.6 60 Credit Suisse, Investment Banking and Securities Investments 0.129 39.2 61 Wells Fargo & Company, Private Banking and Investment Banking Arm 0.128 38.9 62 The California State Teachers Employees' Retirement System 0.123 37.5 63 Florida State Board of Administration 0.119 36.1 64 McAdams Wright Ragen, Inc., Asset Management Arm 0.111 33.7 65 Commerzbank AG, Asset Management Arm 0.11 33.5 66 JPMorgan Chase & Co, Private Banking and Investment Banking Investments 0.11 33.3 67 Capital Growth Management. L.P. 0.106 32.2 68 Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company, Asset Management Arm 0.105 32.0 69 AMP Capital Investors Limited 0.094 28.5 70 BNY Mellon Asset Management 0.089 27.0 71 Citigroup Inc., Asset Management Arm 0.081 24.6 72 Curian Capital, LLC 0.081 24.5 73 Danske Capital AS 0.077 23.5 74 Straubel, Jeffrey B. (Chief Technical Officer) 0.075 22.8 75 Marathon Asset Management, LLP 0.074 22.6 76 Swiss National Bank, Asset Management Arm 0.074 22.5 77 Royal Bank of Canada, Banking & Securities Investments 0.072 21.8 78 Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P 0.071 21.7 79 Barclays PLC Private Banking & Investment Banking Investment 0.071 21.6 80 Knight Capital Group Inc., Asset Management Arm 0.07 21.3 81 Jackson National Asset Management, LLC 0.066 20.1 82 Nomura Holdings Inc, Asset Management Arm 0.065 19.9 83 AQR Capital Management, LLC 0.061 18.4 84 Rhumbline Advisers Ltd Partnership 0.059 17.9 85 Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. 0.057 17.5 86 AllianceBernstein L.P. 0.057 17.5 87 Fred Alger Management, Inc. 0.053 16.2 88 Neptune Investment Management Limited 0.052 15.8 89 Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC (NYSE:OZM) 0.051 15.6 90 Draper Fisher Jurvetson 0.049 15.0 91 The State of Wisconsin Investment Board 0.049 14.8 92 New York State Common Retirement Fund 0.049 14.8 93 Van Eck Associates Corporation 0.048 14.5 94 TD Asset Management, Inc. 0.046 14.1 95 Citadel LLC 0.042 12.9 96 Guggenheim Partners, LLC 0.041 12.5 97 Cadian Capital Management, LLC 0.041 12.4 98 Walleye Trading LLC, Asset Management Arm 0.039 11.9 99 Credit Suisse Asset Management (Switzerland) 0.039 11.8 100 Franklin Resources Inc. (NYSE:BEN) 0.038 11.6 101 Valor Equity Partners L.P. 0.038 11.6 102 Pictet Asset Management Limited 0.038 11.4 103 Wafra Investment Advisory Group, Inc. 0.037 11.4 104 Granahan Investment Management, Inc. 0.037 11.2 105 Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC 0.037 11.2 106 Dorsal Capital Management, LLC 0.037 11.2 107 Columbus Circle Investors 0.036 11.1 108 Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC 0.036 10.9 109 ING Investment Management LLC 0.035 10.7 110 Driehaus Capital Management LLC 0.034 10.4 111 Jurvetson, Steven T. (Director and Member of Audit Committee) 0.034 10.4 112 KCG Holdings Inc., Asset Management Arm 0.033 10.2 113 MFS Investment Management, Inc. 0.033 9.9 114 Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP 0.033 9.9 115 Great-West Capital Management, LLC 0.032 9.8 116 Colonial First State Asset Management (Australia) Limited 0.032 9.7 117 BofA Advisors, LLC 0.029 8.7 118 IBM Retirement Fund 0.028 8.7 119 Lundmark & Co Fondförvaltning AB 0.028 8.6 120 Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management 0.028 8.5 121 HBK Investments L.P. 0.027 8.3 122 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System 0.025 7.5 123 Alydar Partners, LLC 0.024 7.4 124 HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited 0.024 7.3 125 AP Fonden 4 0.024 7.3 126 Pioneer Global Asset Management S.p.A. 0.024 7.3 127 Marsico Capital Management, LLC 0.024 7.2 128 Opus Trading Fund, LLC, Asset Management Arm 0.024 7.2 129 Parallax Fund, L.P. 0.023 7.0 130 Fortress Investment Group LLC (NYSE:FIG) 0.023 6.9 131 Kleinwort Benson Investors Dublin Ltd. 0.022 6.8 132 ProShare Advisors LLC 0.021 6.4 133 Columbia Partners, L.L.C. Investment Management 0.021 6.4 134 French Wolf & Farr, Inc. 0.02 6.2 135 Baird Investment Management 0.02 6.1 136 Public Employees Retirement Association of Colorado 0.02 6.0 137 Diversified Trust Co., Asset Management Arm 0.02 6.0 138 Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited. 0.019 5.8 139 Jane Street Capital, LLC 0.019 5.7 140 Legal & General Investment Management 0.019 5.6 141 Twin Tree Management, L.P. 0.018 5.5 142 Natixis, Investment Banking and Corporate Banking Investments 0.017 5.3 143 PanAgora Asset Management Inc 0.017 5.3 144 Ashfield Capital Partners, LLC 0.017 5.2 145 First Mercantile Trust Company, Asset Management Arm 0.017 5.0 146 1832 Asset Management L.P. 0.017 5.0 147 Raymond James Financial Inc., Asset Management Arm 0.016 5.0 148 Ecofin Limited 0.016 5.0 149 Bankhaus Schelhammer & Schattera, Asset Management Arm 0.016 4.9 150 Technology Partners 0.016 4.9 151 USAA Investment Management Company 0.016 4.9 152 Principal Global Investors, LLC 0.016 4.7 153 Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC 0.016 4.7 154 RidgeWorth Capital Management, Inc. 0.015 4.6 155 LPL Financial Corporation, Asset Management Arm 0.015 4.6 156 Frank Russell Company 0.015 4.6 157 Lincoln Investment Advisors Corporation 0.015 4.5 158 AP Fonden 3 0.015 4.5 159 Amundi Asset Management 0.014 4.3 160 Credit Suisse AG, Asset Management Arm 0.014 4.2 161 Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2010 Employment Report Career Management Center Visit the Career Management Center Online At
    2010 Employment Report Career ManageMent Center Visit the Career Management Center online at www.gsb.columbia.edu/recruiters. Post positions online at www.gsb.columbia.edu/jobpost. reCruItIng at CoLumbia Business schooL Columbia Business School students continue to distinguish themselves with their ability to be nimble and flexible during a shifting economic and hiring landscape. employers report that Columbia MBas have the right mix of tangible business skills and social intelligence—enduring assets for any organization. the School’s focus on educating versatile business leaders who can excel in any environment is proven by a curriculum that bridges academic theory and real-world practice through initiatives like Columbia CaseWorks and the Master Class Program. the School’s cluster system and learning teams, as well as the Program on Social Intelligence, foster a team-oriented work ethic and an entrepreneurial mindset that makes creating and capturing opportunity instinctual. Students are able to add value to a wide range of organizations on day one, and the School’s extraordinary network of alumni, global business partners, and faculty members, along with its seamless integration with new York City, makes Columbia Business School stand out among its peers. the Career Management Center (CMC) works with hiring organizations across the public, private, and nonprofit sectors to develop effective and efficient recruiting strategies. recruiters can get to know the School’s talented students in a variety of ways, such as on-campus job fairs, prerecruiting functions, drop-in sessions, interviews, and educational presentations with student clubs, among other opportunities. Companies can also collaborate with the CMC to interview students closer to the time of hiring on an as-needed basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian Robertson: a Tiger in the Land of Bulls and Bears
    STRACHMAN_FM_pages 6/29/04 11:35 AM Page i Julian Robertson A Tiger in the Land of Bulls and Bears Daniel A. Strachman John Wiley & Sons, Inc. STRACHMAN_FM_pages 6/29/04 11:35 AM Page i Julian Robertson A Tiger in the Land of Bulls and Bears Daniel A. Strachman John Wiley & Sons, Inc. STRACHMAN_FM_pages 6/29/04 11:35 AM Page ii Copyright © 2004 by Daniel A. Strachman. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per- copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the web at www. copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fit- ness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin As a New Payment Instrument
    Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin as a New Payment Instrument By Shinnecock Partners in association with Sophia Bak, Jimmy Yang, Peter Shea, and Neil Liu About the Authors Shinnecock Partners undertook this study of cryptocurrencies with the authors to understand this revolutionary payment system and related technology, explore its disruptive potential, and assess the merits of investing in it. Shinnecock Partners is a 25 year old investment boutique with an especial focus on niche investments offering higher returns with less risk than more traditional investments in long equities and bonds. Sophia Bak is an analyst intern at Shinnecock Partners. She is an MBA candidate at UCLA Anderson School of Management with a focus on Finance. Prior to Anderson, she spent five years at Mirae Asset Global Investments, working in equity research, global business strategy, and investment development. She holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Carnegie Mellon University with concentration in Computing and Information Technology. Jimmy Yang is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Business Economics and Accounting. Peter Shea is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Mathematics, Economics and Statistics. Neil Liu is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Applied Mathematics and Business Economics. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the individuals who shared their time and expertise with us. We want to thank John Villasenor, UCLA professor of Electrical Engineering and Public Policy, Brett Stapper and Brian Lowrance from Falcon Global Capital, and Tiffany Wan and Max Hoblitzell from Deloitte Consulting LLP. We also want to recognize Tracy Williams and Steven Kroll for their thoughtful feedback and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight: Shareholders Are Dispersed and Diverse
    POLICY SPOTLIGHT APRIL 2019 Shareholders Are Dispersed And Diverse Index funds have democratized access to diversified investment for millions of savers, who are investing for long-term goals, like retirement. As index funds are currently growing more quickly than actively managed funds, some critics have expressed concern about increasing concentration of public company ownership in the hands of index fund managers. While it is true that assets under management (or ‘AUM’) in index portfolios have grown, index funds and ETFs represent less than 10% of global equity assets.1 Further, equity investors, and hence public company shareholders, are dispersed across a diverse range of asset owners and asset managers. As of year-end 2017, Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street manage $3.5 trillion, $3.3 trillion, and $1.8 trillion in global equity assets, respectively.2 These investors represent a minority position in the $83 trillion global equity market. As shown in Exhibit 1, the combined AUM of these three managers represents just over 10% of global equity assets. The largest 20 asset managers only account for 22%. Moreover, about two-thirds of all global equity investment is conducted by asset owners choosing to invest in equities directly rather than by employing an asset manager to make investments on their behalf. Exhibit 1: Equity Market Investors3 Total Equity Market Capitalization 100% All Asset Managers 35% Top 20 Managers 22% Top 10 Managers 17% VGD 4% BLK 4% SSgA 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Exhibit 1 alone does not paint a complete picture of the diversity of equity market investors, as there is significant variation amongst asset managers and asset owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Fund Billionaires Attack the Hudson Valley Wall Street Goes All in to Save Tax Breaks for the Wealthy
    HEDGE PAPERS No.39 HEDGE FUND BILLIONAIRES ATTACK THE HUDSON VALLEY WALL STREET GOES ALL IN TO SAVE TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY Hedge funds and billionaire hedge fund managers are destroying our economy, corrupting our government, hurting families and communities and exploding inequality. It’s happening all over America, and increasingly all over the world. And now it’s happening in the Hudson Valley. A tiny group of hedge fund billionaires have targeted the congressional campaign in the 19th House District of New York, spending millions of dollars to support GOP candidate John Faso and attack Democratic candidate Zephyr Teachout. SIX HEDGE FUND BILLIONAIRES HIT THE HUDSON VALLEY WITH $5.5 MILLION IN CAMPAIGN CASH The amount of campaign cash is amazing: we’ve found that six billionaire hedge fund managers from New York City, Connecticut and Long Island have given $5,517,600 to PACs and Super PACs active in the Teachout-Faso campaign in this electoral cycle. These same six men have given $102,768,940 in federal and New York state campaign contributions in the past two decades. They’re not doing it for nothing -- they want something in return. These hedge fund billionaires and their colleagues at hedge funds and private equity firms get billions of dollars in special tax breaks under the “carried interest loophole” – and they want to keep the loophole wide open. Closing the loophole would save the federal government an estimated $18 billion per year, according to an analysis by law professor Victor Fleischer.[1] But huge sums of lobbying and campaign cash directed at Congress – and Congressional candidates – by hedge funds and private equity firms have stymied reform in Washington and fueled continued obstructionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund
    Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fund Annual Report October 31, 2020 See the inside front cover for important information about access to your fund’s shareholder reports. Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of a fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the fund or from your financial intermediary, such as a financial advisor, broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report. If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from a fund electronically, by contacting your financial intermediary. For Fidelity customers, visit Fidelity’s web site or call Fidelity using the contact information listed below. You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports, you may contact your financial intermediary or, if you are a Fidelity customer, visit Fidelity’s website, or call Fidelity at the applicable toll-free number listed below. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with the fund complex/your financial intermediary. Account Type Website
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 Hedge Funds
    P2BW14403B-0-P01100-1--------XA P22 BARRON'S May24,2010 May24,2010 BARRON'S P11 BLACK Top 100 Hedge Funds The market’s horrors of 2008 gave way to the pleasures of 2009. John Paulson’s Paulson Credit Opportunities fund has gained a phenomenal 123% annually over the past three years. The worst-performing member of Barron’s Top 100 has returned roughly five times what the average hedge fund has risen. Currencies (USD, GBP and Euro) refer to specific currency classes of a fund. Fund 3-Year RANKING Assets Compound 2009 Total Firm 05/24/2010 2009 ’08 Name (mil) Fund Strategy Annual Return Return Company Name / Location Assets (mil) 1. nr Paulson Credit Opportunities a $4,000 Credit 122.92% 35.02% Paulson / New York $32,000 2. 2. Balestra Capital Partners 1,050 Global Macro 65.63 4.22 Balestra Capital / New York 1,225 3. nr Medallion 9,000 Quantitative Trading 62.80 38.00 Renaissance Tech / East Setauket, NY 15,000 4. 13. Element Capital 1,214 Macro/Relative Value 45.02 78.82 Element Capital / New York 1,214 IF THERE WERE EE,EU,MW,NL,SW,WE 5. nr Providence MBS Offshore 333 Mortgage-Backed Securities 44.29 85.67 Providence Investment Mgmt / Providence, RI 400 6. nr OEI Mac (USD) 355 Equity Long/Short 41.78 18.56 Odey Asset Mgmt / London 2,834 7. 1. Paulson Advantage b 4,750 Event Arbitrage 41.31 13.60 Paulson / New York 32,000 EVERATIMETOASK 8. nr SPM Structured Servicing 1,049 Mortgage-Backed Securities 39.80 134.60 Structured Portfolio Mgmt / Stamford, CT 2,725 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Geode Capital Management , LLC Subadvisor: Geode Capital Management , LLC Advisor: Fidelity Investments
    Index Investing with Fidelity Product overview August 2021 Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee For institutional use only. Index Investing with Fidelity 1. Overview 2. Investment Philosophy 3. Offerings 4. Equity and Specialty 5. Fixed Income 6. Index Fund Performance Summary 7. Securities Lending 8. Appendix 9. Important Information See Important Information for a discussion of performance data, some of the principal risks related to any of the investment strategies referred to in this presentation, and other information related to this presentation. 2 For institutional use only. Why Fidelity for Index? Broad Range Index Fund Low of Market Management Cost and Index Expertise Exposures Some of the most Fidelity’s lineup offers Fidelity is the second competitively priced investors access to all largest index mutual mutual funds and pools core asset class fund provider in the in the industry. exposures as well as industry, with more than more specialized indexes. 30 years of index fund experience.* *Based on $906 billion in index fund assets under management (AUM) as of 6/30/2021. Source: Morningstar. 3 For institutional use only. Fidelity Index Funds Investment Philosophy Fidelity seeks to provide investors with low-cost portfolios that tightly track their benchmarks by focusing on data integrity and employing state-of-the-art trading and risk management tools. Tracking Risk Tools Securities Error Management Lending Work to achieve the Manage multiple risk Utilize state-of-the-art Employ securities lowest possible factors relative to trading and liquidity lending policies that tracking error benchmarks management tools seek to generate revenue and benefit investors 4 For institutional use only.
    [Show full text]
  • Fit to Be King: How Patrimonialism on Wall Street Leads to Inequality Megan Tobias Neely*
    Socio-Economic Review, 2018, Vol. 16, No. 2, 365–385 doi: 10.1093/ser/mwx058 Article Article Fit to be king: how patrimonialism on Wall Street leads to inequality Megan Tobias Neely* The Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94025-2047, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract The hedge fund industry is one of the most lucrative and powerful industries in the USA, yet it mostly comprises white men. To understand why, I turn to Weber’s theory of patrimonialism, which primarily has been applied to historical or non- Western societies. I argue that patrimonialism—activated through trust, loyalty and tradition—restricts access to financial rewards and facilitates the reproduction of the white male domination of this industry. Using data from 45 in-depth interviews com- bined with field observations at industry events over a 4-year period, I investigate how hiring, grooming and seeding practices within and among firms enable certain elites to maintain monopolies over financial resources. Applying the theory of patri- monialism to a context with few women and minority men in power-holding posi- tions demonstrates how practices that reproduce elite structures are directly connected to inequality in the workplace. Key words: patrimonialism, trust, loyalty, social capital, elites, gender, race and ethnicity, social class, work and occupations, finance JEL classification: G24, J44, J62, J70, J71 1. Introduction Inequality in the USA has returned to levels unprecedented since the years before World War II. The rising incomes of the top 10% of earners are driving this increasing inequality (Piketty, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc
    SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2018 PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS 7,500,000 SHARES BAIN CAPITAL SPECIALTY FINANCE, INC. Common Stock We are an externally managed specialty finance company focused on lending to middle market companies that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (‘‘BDC’’), under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the ‘‘1940 Act’’). Our primary focus is capitalizing on opportunities within our Senior Direct Lending strategy, which seeks to provide risk-adjusted returns and current income to our stockholders by investing primarily in middle market companies with between $10.0 million and $150.0 million in annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We focus on senior investments with a first or second lien on collateral and strong structures and documentation intended to protect the lender. We may also invest in mezzanine debt and other junior securities, including common and preferred equity, on an opportunistic basis, and in secondary purchases of assets or portfolios, but such investments are not the principal focus of our investment strategy. We are managed by our investment adviser, BCSF Advisors, LP, a subsidiary of Bain Capital Credit, LP. This is an initial public offering of shares of our common stock. All of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are being sold by us. Shares of our common stock have no history of public trading. We currently expect that the initial public offering price per share of our common stock will be between $20.25 and $21.25.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® International Enhanced Index Fund
    PORTFOLIO MANAGER Q&A | AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2021 Fidelity® International Enhanced Index Fund Key Takeaways • For the semiannual reporting period ending February 28, 2021, the fund gained 15.72%, outperforming the 14.38% increase in the benchmark MSCI EAFE Index. • Compared with the benchmark the past six months, the fund benefited from favorable security selection across a diversified combination of factor exposures. • Versus the benchmark, security selection particularly added value in the materials, financials, communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. • In contrast, picks among health care and information technology detracted from the fund's relative performance. • In terms of sector positioning, the portfolio benefited most from an underweighting in the lagging consumer staples sector. • Senior Portfolio Manager Maximilian Kaufmann and his team employ an investment model intended to identify companies with fundamental characteristics shown to be correlated with long-term outperformance. • This period, Max and his team made no significant changes to the model and remained committed to their quantitative approach to investing. FISCAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY: Cumulative Annualized Periods ending February 28, 2021 6 1 3 5 10 Year/ Month YTD Year Year Year LOF1 Fidelity International Enhanced Index Fund 15.72% 1.95% 21.81% 3.45% 9.56% 5.48% Gross Expense Ratio: 0.59%2 MSCI EAFE Index (Net MA) 14.38% 1.16% 22.68% 4.81% 9.96% 5.22% Morningstar Fund Foreign Large Value 17.50% 3.24% 17.86% 1.48% 7.68% 3.36% % Rank in Morningstar Category (1% = Best) -- -- 32% 15% 14% 7% # of Funds in Morningstar Category -- -- 354 325 283 185 1 Life of Fund (LOF) if performance is less than 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Geode Firm Brochure
    Geode Capital Management, LLC Form CRS Customer Relationship Summary, March 30, 20211 Introduction Geode Capital Management, LLC (“GCM”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser. Brokerage and investment advisory services and fees differ and it is important for you to understand the differences. Free and simple tools are available to research firms and financial professionals at Investor.gov/CRS, which also provides educational materials about broker-dealers, investment advisers, and investing. What We offer investment advisory services to certain retail investors2, including serving as a sub-adviser investment for discretionary managed account services through Fidelity Automated Managed Platform (the “AMP services Service”) and as an adviser or sub-adviser providing investment advisory services for certain high and advice net worth individuals. We generally have discretionary investment authority to select brokers and to can you buy, sell, and allocate investments within your accounts consistent with the investment model, provide strategies and guidelines you have selected, including any restrictions you may impose on your me? account. This means that we make these investment decisions on your behalf without needing to provide prior notice and without soliciting your consent. Clients who use the AMP Service will generally be limited to investments in certain mutual funds and Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”). GCM will monitor and review your account as often as specified by the AMP Service or our agreement with you. For accounts using the AMP Service, only retail investors who meet certain qualification criteria (including, account minimums) may participate. For other retail investors, GCM may require different minimum investment amounts based on the investment strategy and type of account.
    [Show full text]