Ophraella Communa, the Ragweed Leaf Beetle, Has Successfully Landed in Europe: Fortunate Coincidence Or Threat?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ophraella Communa, the Ragweed Leaf Beetle, Has Successfully Landed in Europe: Fortunate Coincidence Or Threat? DOI: 10.1111/wre.12072 PRIORITY PAPER Ophraella communa, the ragweed leaf beetle, has successfully landed in Europe: fortunate coincidence or threat? HMULLER-SCH€ ARER*,€ S T E LOMMEN*, M ROSSINELLI†, M BONINI‡, M BORIANI§,GBOSIO¶ & U SCHAFFNER** *Departement de Biologie/Ecologie & Evolution, Universite de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland, †Servizio fitosanitario Canton Ticino, Bellinzona, Switzerland, ‡Dipartimento di Prevenzione Medica, ASL MILANO 1, Parabiago, Milano, Italy, §Regione Lombardia, Laboratorio fitopatologico, Servizio fitosanitario regionale, Vertemate con Minoprio, Como, Italy, ¶Regione Piemonte, Settore Fitosanitario, Torino, Italy, and **CABI, Delemont, Switzerland HMuller-Sch€ arer€ and S T E Lommen contributed equally to this work. Received 27 October 2013 Revised version accepted 18 December 2013 Subject Editor: Paul Hatcher, Reading, UK suitability. This oligophagous beetle is a successful bio- Summary logical control agent against A. artemisiifolia in China, We report the occurrence of the North American rag- but despite extensive host specificity tests, the risk of weed leaf beetle Ophraella communa in Europe. During attack and the level of damage of sunflower under field our surveys to monitor populations of the invasive alien conditions remain unclear. The recently launched COST plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe, we found the Action on ‘Sustainable management of Ambrosia artem- beetle south of the Alps, in more than 130 sites in south- isiifolia in Europe (SMARTER)’ offers an ideal frame- ern Switzerland (Ticino) and northern Italy (Lombardia, work to respond quickly to the recent establishment of Piemonte and Emilia-Romagna). At sites where O. communa in Europe and to collect data that can help O. communa was present, up to 100% of the plants were determine whether this event should be considered a attacked with damage levels high enough to completely troublesome introduction or whether it is likely to defoliate and prevent flowering and seed set of most rag- become the first case of a successful biological control of weed plants. That in its first year of discovery, O. comm- an invasive weed in continental Europe. una was already found over a large area of c. 20 000 km2 Keywords: biological control, leaf feeder, weed manage- and in all habitat types occupied by A. artemisiifolia ment, invasive alien species, Ambrosia artemisiifolia. reflects its great dispersal potential and wide habitat MULLER€ -SCHARER€ H, LOMMEN STE, ROSSINELLI M, BONINI M, BORIANI M, BOSIO G&SCHAFFNER U (2014). Ophra- ella communa, the ragweed leaf beetle, has successfully landed in Europe: fortunate coincidence or threat? Weed Research. alien plants in Europe (Shine et al., 2010). This plant Introduction originates from North America but has become wide- Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. (Asteraceae; common rag- spread in other continents, including Asia, Australia weed) has uniquely raised the awareness of invasive and Europe (Cunze et al., 2013; GISD, 2013). In Correspondence: Prof. Dr. Heinz Muller-Sch€ arer,€ Departement de Biologie/Ecologie & Evolution, Universite de Fribourg/Perolles, Chemin du Musee 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland. Tel: (+41) 26 300 88 35/50; Fax: (+41) 26 300 96 98; E-mail: [email protected] © 2014 European Weed Research Society 2 HMuller-Sch€ arer€ et al. Europe, it is most abundant in the Pannonian Plains, autumn of 2013. The beetle was discovered and then the Lyon area in France, the Milano area in Italy, Uk- surveyed independently by different teams in different raine and southern Russia (Prank et al., 2013). The regions. During regular surveys of the Swiss cantonal main problem with this plant is its production of phytosanitary service of Ticino, we found for the first highly allergenic pollen, generating huge medical costs time an infestation by a leaf beetle in Switzerland (Bal- and reduced quality of life among the allergic popula- erna, 12 July; Appendix 1). A quick scan of the area tion (Fumanal et al., 2007). Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Ticino and Varese (Lombardia, Italy) within the also has become a major weed in European agricul- next 2 weeks revealed that many other A. artemisiifolia ture, especially in spring-sown crops such as sunflower, sites were infested. Morphological identification of maize, sugar beet and soybean (Komives et al., 2006). specimens collected at three of these sites (1x Ticino, The spread and impact of A. artemisiifolia is likely to 2x Varese, cf. Appendix 1) confirmed that the speci- increase with changing climate, posing a significant risk mens collected were O. communa. This corroborated to society, even in countries presently not yet affected, morphological and molecular analyses of beetles col- as evidenced by both ecological niche models lected in a parallel survey in Lombardia from another (Hyvonen€ et al., 2011; Bullock, 2012; Cunze et al., site in Varese (Castellanza, 30 July) (Appendix 1, Bori- 2013) and process-based (or mechanistic) distribution ani et al., 2013). In hindsight, the beetle had also models (Chapman et al., 2014). Chemical and mechan- already been seen in the Milano area (Lombardia, ical control methods have been developed and partially Italy: Abbiategrasso, 10 July) by the local health ser- implemented to control A. artemisiifolia (Buttenschøn vice authority, but had not been recognised at the et al., 2010), but they are not a solution for all invaded time. In Piemonte, the beetle was first observed by the habitats and often do not result in the eradication of local phytosanitary service (Galliate, 7 Aug.). populations. To mitigate A. artemisiifolia’s further Ophraella communa is presently regarded in China spread and to reduce its abundance in badly infested as the most successful weed biological control agent, areas in Europe, sustainable control strategies need to killing A. artemisiifolia plants over large areas before be based on a combination of methods. seed set (FH Wan and ZS Zhou, personal communica- While classical biological control of A. artemisiifolia tion 2013). This effect could not only be achieved has been successfully implemented in other continents through inundative releases (after mass rearing and (Australia, China: Palmer et al., 2010; Zhou et al., field releases on a given population), but also through 2010), this long-term management tool is not yet imple- migration of the beetles following rapid local popula- mented in Europe. Biological control attempts in China tion build-up (Guo et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013). The started in the mid-1960s and up to the 1980s, five three larval stages and the adults of the beetle all feed insects species were sequentially introduced (Wan et al., on leaves of A. artemisiifolia (Wan et al., 2009). 2009). Presently, the most efficient and successful spe- Here, we present results on the occurrence of cies are the stem-galling moth Epiblema strenuana O. communa in Europe in 2013 and the phenology of (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae; first released in attack at sites in northern Italy and southern Switzer- 1993) and the leaf beetle Ophraella communa LeSage land. We briefly discuss the type of data that need to (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; accidental introduction, be collected to allow a thorough assessment of whether discovered in 2001), both with up to six generations per the establishment of O. communa in Europe should be year in southern China (Chen et al., 2013). considered as a fortunate coincidence in the campaign The recently started EU-COST Action ‘Sustainable against the highly invasive A. artemisiifolia, or whether management of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe it should be considered as a threat to closely related (SMARTER)’ aims to develop a sustainable manage- wild or crop species. ment strategy for A. artemisiifolia in Europe, with a focus on biological control (cf. www.ragweed.eu). In Materials and methods this framework, a recent literature survey to explore prospects for biological control in Europe prioritised After discoveries of the beetle in early summer 2013 in six insect herbivores and one rust pathogen from the both Switzerland and Italy, several teams independently native North American range of the plant; the few performed a preliminary survey of O. communa occur- natural enemies that have colonised A. artemisiifolia in rences in adjacent areas. As the different teams had no Europe are polyphagous and cause little damage, ren- prior knowledge of each other’s activities, surveying dering them unsuitable for an augmentative approach methods had not been standardised. As soon as the dif- (Gerber et al., 2011). However, to our surprise, we ferent teams knew of the others’ work, they immedi- found large infestations of a leaf beetle in southern ately decided to homogenise the data as far as possible. Switzerland and northern Italy in the summer and Finally, a handful of beetle occurrences reported by © 2014 European Weed Research Society The ragweed leaf beetle has landed in Europe 3 others that we had instructed were included in the data and random way, we only report sites where the beetle set. From mid-July to mid-October 2013, more than was found, and not those where the beetle was absent. 150 A. artemisiifolia sites in Italy (121), Switzerland (30) and France (4) were surveyed. Surveys were gener- Results ally limited to the area where the conducting authority is active (Swiss cantons, Italian regions or provinces, Ophraella communa occurrences French departments) and was sometimes extended somewhat beyond these borders. In the most severely So far, O. communa has only been observed south of the infested areas (Swiss cantons Ticino and Geneva, Ital- Alps (Fig. 2), where we found it in more than 80% of ian province Milano), the surveys were part of the regu- sites surveyed, covering an area of c. 20 000 km2 (112/ lar A. artemisiifolia monitoring by local authorities and 121 sites in Italy, 20/30 in Switzerland, 0/4 in France, previously known A. artemisiifolia sites were visited. In details of occurrences in Appendix 1, including habitat other parts of Lombardia and in Piemonte, where exact types occupied by A.
Recommended publications
  • Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Reared from Hypercompe Cunigunda (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in Brazil
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 64(1):e201982, 2020 www.rbentomologia.com Diolcogaster choi sp. nov. from Brazil, a new gregarious microgastrine parasitoid wasp (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) reared from Hypercompe cunigunda (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in Brazil Geraldo Salgado-Neto1* , Ísis Meri Medri2, José L. Fernández-Triana3, James Bryan Whitfield4 1Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Defesa Fitossanitária, Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. 2Universidade de Brasília, Departamento de Ecologia, Doutorado em Ecologia, Brasília, D F, Brasil. 3Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Entomology, Urbana, USA. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28F860D2-5CDB-4D55-82BC-C41CFE1ADD0E ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: A new species of Diolcogaster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is described and illustrated. Additionally, its position Received 23 August 2019 within the recently published key to New World species of the xanthaspis species-group (to which the described Accepted 17 December 2019 Diolcogaster belongs) is provided. The gregarious larval parasitoid Diolcogaster choi sp. nov. was collected in Available online 17 February 2020 Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil. This natural enemy was recovered from a caterpillar of Hypercompe cunigunda (Stoll, Associate Editor: Bernardo Santos 1781) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) that was feeding on plant of passionflower, Passiflora edulis Sims (Passifloraceae). The fauna of the xanthaspis group in the New World now includes five species, including the new species from Brazil described in this paper. Diolcogaster choi sp. nov. differs anatomically, and is morphologically diagnosed, Keywords: from all other known member of the xanthaspis group of the genus Diolcogaster, to which it belongs. The species Caterpillar also differs in recorded host, and its DNA barcode appears to be distinctive among described Diolcogaster.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia Artemisiifolia
    Article Type: Biological Flora BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 278 List Vasc. Pl. Br. Isles (1992) no. 135, 74, 1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia Franz Essl1,2,†, Krisztina Biró3, Dietmar Brandes4, Olivier Broennimann5, James M. Bullock6, Daniel S. Chapman7, Bruno Chauvel8, Stefan Dullinger1,9, Boris Fumanal10,11, Antoine Guisan5,12, Gerhard Karrer13, Gabriela Kazinczi14, Christoph Kueffer15, Beryl Laitung16, Claude Lavoie17, Michael Leitner18, Thomas Mang1, Dietmar Moser1, Heinz Müller-Schärer19, Blaise Petitpierre5, Robert Richter20, Urs Schaffner21, Matt Smith22, 23 24 20 25 Uwe Starfinger , Robert Vautard , Gero Vogl , Moritz von der Lippe and Swen 26 Article Follak 1Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Conservation, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, University Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria; 2Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag 91, Matieland 7602, South Africa; 3University of Pannonia, Georgikon Faculty, Institut for Plant Protection, 8361 Keszthely, Deák F.str. 16, Hungary; 4Technical University Braunschweig, Institute for Plant Biology, Mendelsohnstraße 4, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; 5Department of Ecology & Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 6NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK; 7NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, UK; 8INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, 21000 Dijon, France; 9Vienna Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts
    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory
    Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory New York Natural Heritage Program Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory Established in 1985, the New York Natural Heritage NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an Program (NYNHP) is a program of the State University of online tool for invasive species reporting and data New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry management. (SUNY ESF). Our mission is to facilitate conservation of NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable rare animals, rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We online resources: Conservation Guides include the accomplish this mission by combining thorough field biology, identification, habitat, and management of many inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and the of New York’s rare species and natural community most comprehensive database on New York's distinctive types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and biodiversity to deliver the highest quality information for communities in a specified area of interest. natural resource planning, protection, and management. The program is an active participant in the The Program is funded by grants and contracts from NatureServe Network – an international network of government agencies whose missions involve natural biodiversity data centers overseen by a Washington D.C. resource management, private organizations involved in based non-profit organization. There are currently land protection and stewardship, and both government and Natural Heritage Programs or Conservation Data private organizations interested in advancing the Centers in all 50 states and several interstate regions. conservation of biodiversity. There are also 10 programs in Canada, and many NY Natural Heritage is housed within NYS DEC’s participating organizations across 12 Latin and South Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Tishomingo NWR Moth List
    Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge Moth List Hodges Number Family SubFamily Species Name_Common 00373 Tineidae Acrolophus popeanella 02401 Yponomeutidae Atteva punctella Ailanthus Webworm Moth 02693 Cossidae Cossinae Prionoxystus robinae Carpenterworm Moth 03593 Tortricidae Tortricinae Pandemis lamprosana Woodgrain Leafroller 03594 Tortricidae Tortricinae Pandemis limitata Three-lined Leafroller 04667 Limacodidae Apoda y-inversum Yellow-Collared Slug 04669 Limacodidae Apoda biguttata 04691 Limacodidae Monoleuca semifascia 04697 Limacodidae Euclea delphinii Spiny Oak Slug Moth 04794 Pyralidae Odontiinae Eustixia pupula Spotted Peppergrass Moth 04895 Pyralidae Glaphyriinae Chalcoela iphitalis 04975 Pyralidae Pyraustinae Achyra rantalis Garden Webworm 04979 Pyralidae Pyraustinae Neohelvibotys polingi 04991 Pyralidae Pyraustinae Sericoplaga externalis 05069 Pyralidae Pyraustinae Pyrausta tyralis 05070 Pyralidae Pyraustinae Pyrausta laticlavia Southern Purple Mint Moth 05159 Pyralidae Spilomelinae Desmia funeralis Grape Leaffolder Moth 05226 Pyralidae Spilomelinae Palpita magniferalis Splendid Palpita 05256 Pyralidae Spilomelinae Diastictis fracturalis 05292 Pyralidae Spilomelinae Conchylodes ovulalis 05362 Pyralidae Crambinae Crambus agitatellus Double-banded Grass-veneer 05450 Pyralidae Crambinae Parapediasia decorella 05533 Pyralidae Pyralinae Dolichomia olinalis Yellow-fringed Dolichomia 05579 Pyralidae Epipaschiinae Epipaschia zelleri Zeller's Epipaschia 05625 Pyralidae Galleriinae Omphalocera cariosa 05779.1 Pyralidae Phycitinae Quasisalebriaria
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Insect Biodiversity and Promoting Sustainable Practices Toward Pollinators on Campus
    Sustainability Fee Project Grant Report Guidelines for grants awarded during FY2019 Due by 5pm August 1, 2019 Email pdf or word doc to [email protected] Please provide the following information in order to help the Center for Sustainability document the success of the Sustainability Fee Grant Program. Date: 1 August 2019 Name(s): Lance A. Durden, Jose A. Sanchez-Ruiz, Debra G. Albanese, Julien M. Buchbinder. Unit/Department(s): Biology E-mail address: [email protected] Phone: (912)478-5591 Project title: Assessing Insect Biodiversity and Promoting Sustainable Practices toward Pollinators on Campus. Amount granted: $27,560 Amount spent: $20,627.87 I. Project Outcomes/Value Detail the planned and actual outcomes of the project here. In a continuing effort to assess biodiversity and promote sustainable practices on the GSU (Statesboro) campus, this project aimed to add arthropods, perhaps the most biodiverse group of animals on the planet, to the vertebrate biodiversity database created in 2015. We exposed faculty, staff, students and the general public to the benefits of arthropod diversity through field activities on campus and exhibitions by focusing on charismatic insect groups and their environmental importance. Additionally, the project took advantage of the already established “iNaturalist” smartphone application to promote citizen science. We concentrated our efforts on two groups of beneficial insects in an effort to educate people of their importance, to reduce pesticide and herbicide use on campus and elsewhere, and to protect these organisms. We promoted Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) as important pollinators of flowering plants and Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as important predators of biting insects such as mosquitoes and biting midges.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Biodiversity on Prairies Lacking Fire Management
    1 Insect Biodiversity on Prairies Lacking Fire Management with focus on Lepidoptera (Moths and Butterflies) Kyle Johnson Honorary Fellow, University of Wisconsin-Madison 445 Russell Labs, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................3 Introduction and Study Overview..............................................................................................................3 Study Sites..................................................................................................................................................4 Methods....................................................................................................................................................10 Results.......................................................................................................................................................14 Discussion..................................................................................................................................................47 Future Studies............................................................................................................................................48 References.................................................................................................................................................48 3 Acknowledgements This project was financially supported
    [Show full text]
  • University of Guelph ARBORETUM MOTHS All Species Found by CANDICE TALBOT (CT) Unless Otherwise Indicated
    University of Guelph ARBORETUM MOTHS All species found by CANDICE TALBOT (CT) unless otherwise indicated. Other contributors: AB – Andrew Bendall AT – Andalyne Tofflemire CE – Chris Earley FR – Fiona Reid MK – Mike Kent Some notes about the records: Most moths were found at or near the J.C. Taylor Nature Centre, coming to building lights, or to a black light and sheet hung by the building, or to painted bait on nearby trees. Semi-regular monitoring was started by CT in 2012, with a small number of incidental observations pre- dating that time. Dates are written as 20140503 (e.g. May 3, 2014) and photographic records likely exist for all specific dates listed. Dates in brackets indicate that the moth was first recorded as present by CT before that date, but an image may not be available for the earlier sight record. Our list follows the order and groups of Beadle & Leckie (2012) Peterson Field Guide to Moths of Northeastern North America. Identifications are based on photographs using this guide as well as other published print and online resources for comparison. We acknowledge that, in some cases, definitive identification may not be possible without dissection and professional examination of the genitalia. Therefore some of our species identifications for difficult groups should be considered tentative. In other cases identification to genus is all that is possible, given the current knowledge of some groups or species complexes. Moss-Eaters - Family Micropterigidae 1. Goldcap Moss-eater Epimartyria auricrinella 20140530 AB Ghost Moths – Family Hepialidae 2. Lupulina Ghost Moth Korscheltellus lupulina 20120531 AB 3. Gold-spotted Ghost Moth Sthenopis auratus 20140621 Family Nepticulidae 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) 137 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.39.427 RESEARCH ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 39:Review 137–160 of (2010) the New World genera of the subfamily Acontiinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) 137 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.39.427 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Review of the New World genera of the subfamily Acontiinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) J. Donald Lafontaine1, Robert W. Poole2 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, KW Neatby Bldg., C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Research Associate, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Corresponding authors: Don Lafontaine ([email protected]), Bob Poole ([email protected]) Academic editor: ChristianSchmidt | Received 26 December 2009 | Accepted 18 January 2010 | Published 18 March 2010 Citation: Lafontaine JD, Poole RW (2010) Review of the New World genera of the subfamily Acontiinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths II. Zoo- Keys 39: 137–160. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.39.427 Abstract Th e taxonomic status of the 138 species of Acontiinae are reviewed and assigned to seven genera, Ponome- tia Herrich-Schäff er, Tarache Hübner, Acontia Ochsenheimer, Eusceptis Hübner, Pseudalypia H. Edwards, Spragueia Grote, and Trogotorna Hampson. A key to the genera, diagnoses of the genera, species groups of Tarache, illustrations of adults and genitalia of representatives of the seven genera, and a check list of the New World species are included. Keywords Taxonomy, Acontiinae, New World, Acontia, Eusceptis, Ponometia, Pseudalypia, Spragueia, Tarache, Trogotorna Introduction Th e purpose of this paper is to propose a new classifi cation for the New World species of the noctuid subfamily Acontiinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths & Butterflies
    Moths & Butterflies of Eagle Valley Preserve Compiled by Kyle E. Johnson Data Sources and Acknowledgements This checklist is based almost entirely on specimens collected and determined by the author (470+ species). Andrew Williams contributed seven additional species. All species are based on voucher specimens; these are housed in the University of Wisconsin-Madison Insect Research Collection (WIRC), with a few duplicates in other research collections. The specimens have detailed data and are fully databased. The Kohler Trust for Preservation provided funding for this project. I thank Brett & Carole Mandernack for their hospitality and enthusiasm while visiting the preserve. I thank Dan Young and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Insect Research Collection for the lab space and other resources which make such projects possible. Finally, I thank Bob Borth and Steve Bransky for good company in the field. Micro Moths = 156+ species Butterflies = 35 species Macro Moths = 286+ species Total Lepidoptera = 477+ species Biodiversity on the Preserve How many more species are out there? A whole lot is the short answer. Sampling on the preserve has only spanned two years; there are plenty of weaknesses in seasonal coverage, habitats which have been sparsely investigated, and sampling techniques which need attention. Additional species even lurk among the specimens already collected as some remain unidentified, the vast majority of these being “micro moths”. Thus the micro moths are underrepresented in this checklist. A conservative estimate suggests that 470 species is roughly one third of the actual diversity. At Mosquito Hill Nature Center in Outagamie County Hugo Kons Jr. (pers. comm.) surveyed for macro moths and butterflies intensively over many years; he documented an impressive 782 species.
    [Show full text]