CLE Materials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CLE Materials A pandemic, an election, mass protests, Middle East conflicts, cyber warfare, and more: national security is dire to our country now more than ever. Join us to explore the progression and current state of national security law in the United States. Experts in the field will discuss the origins of national security law, how it has transformed following traumatic events such as 9/11, how it has developed in the world of cybersecurity, and what threats we've seen as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This free, public event is sponsored by The University of Toledo Law Review. 1 Table of Contents Agenda ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Panelist Biographies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 McKaye Neumeister, Reviving the Power of the Purse: Appropriations Clause Litigation and National Security Law, 127 YALE L.J. 2512 (2018)………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 John P. Carlin, Detect, Disrupt, Deter: A Whole-of-Government Approach to National Security Cyber Threats, 7 HARV. NAT’L SEC. J. 391 (2016)…………………………………………………………………………………..……......63 Sudha Setty, Obama;s National Security Exceptionalism, 91 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 91 (2016)………………………100 Emily Berman, The Attack on the Capitol Calls for a Measured Response, JOURNAL OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAW & POLICY (Jan. 25, 2021), https://jnslp.com/topics/read/special-online-issue-capitol-insurrection- 2021/................................................................................................................................................118 Representative Eric M. Swalwell and R. Kyle Alagood, Biological Threats Are National Security Risks: Why COVID-19 Should Be a Wake-up Call for Policy Makers, 77 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 217 (2020)….......120 2 Symposium Agenda 9 a.m. – Welcome/Opening 9:30 a.m. – Originalism and National Security Power Harold J. Krent, professor of law, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law (Chicago, Ill.) Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, Berkeley Law (Berkeley, Calif.) Julian Davis Mortenson, James G. Phillipp Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School (Ann Arbor, Mich.) 10:45 a.m. – Post-9/11 National Security Alka Pradhan, lecturer in law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (Philadelphia, Pa.) Stephen Vladeck, Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts, University of Texas School of Law (Austin, Texas) William Banks, professor of law emeritus, Syracuse University College of Law (Syracuse, N.Y.) Noon – Lunch Break 1 p.m. – Cybersecurity in the Modern Age Col. Gary Corn, adjunct professor and director of Tech, Law & Security Program, American University Washington College of Law (Washington, D.C.) Maj. Gen. Charles Dunlap, professor of law and executive director of Center on Law, Ethics and National Security, Duke University School of Law (Durham, N.C.) Robert Litt, of counsel at Morrison & Foerster (Washington, D.C.) 2:15 p.m. – COVID-19 Threats to National Security Mary McCord, legal director, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (Washington, D.C.) Javed Ali, Towsley Foundation Policymaker in Residence, University of Michigan Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy (Ann Arbor, Mich.) 3:30 p.m. – Closing Remarks 3 Panelist Biographies ORIGINALISM AND NATIONAL SECURITY POWER Harold Krent Harold Krent is a professor of law at the Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology. He graduated from Princeton University and received his law degree from New York University School of Law, where he served as law review notes editor and garnered several awards for excellence in writing. Krent clerked for the Hon. William H. Timbers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and then worked in the Department of Justice for the Appellate Staff of the Civil Division, writing briefs and arguing cases in various courts of appeals across the nation. He has been teaching full-time since 1987. His scholarship focuses on the legal aspects of individuals' interaction with the government. Krent has served as a consultant to the Administrative Conference of the United States. He has also litigated numerous cases with students on behalf of indigent prisoners. Krent joined the IIT Chicago-Kent faculty in 1994. He was appointed associate dean in 1997 and interim dean in 2002 before assuming the deanship on Jan. 1, 2003. He continued in his role as dean until July 31, 2019. His book, "Presidential Powers," is a comprehensive examination of the president's role as defined by the U.S. Constitution and judicial and historical precedents. Erwin Chemerinsky Erwin Chemerinsky became the 13th dean of Berkeley Law in 2017, when he joined the faculty as the Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law. Before assuming this position, he was the founding dean and Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California Irvine School of Law. Chemerinsky is the author of 12 books and more than 200 law review articles. He writes a regular column for the Sacramento Bee, monthly columns for the ABA Journal and the Daily Journal, and op-eds in newspapers across the country. He frequently argues appellate cases, including in the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2016, Chemerinsky was named a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2017, National Jurist magazine named Dean Chemerinsky as the most influential person in legal education in the nation. Julian Davis Mortenson Julian Davis Mortenson is the James G. Pillipp Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. He writes on constitutional and international law. His current book project, "The Founders' President" (under contract with Harvard University Press), develops a comprehensive account of presidential power at the American Founding. Mortenson is an award-winning teacher and an active litigator. He regularly litigates complex transnational matters in the U.S. courts and has served as an arbitrator, counsel, and expert witness in a wide variety of commercial and investor-state disputes. He was lead counsel in a pre-Obergefell suit that required Michigan to recognize the marriages of more than 300 same-sex couples. He represented discharged military service members challenging the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law, and his work as one of the principal drafters of merit briefs in the landmark case Boumediene v. Bush secured the right of Guantanamo detainees to challenge their incarceration. Before joining the faculty, Mortenson worked at the law firm WilmerHale, in the President's Office of the UN's International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and as a law clerk for both Justice David H. Souter and the Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson III. Before law school, he was a management 4 consultant with a client portfolio spanning the finance, manufacturing, oil and gas, and information technology industries. Professor Mortenson was salutatorian of his class at Stanford Law School and received an A.B., summa cum laude, in history from Harvard College. POST-9/11 NATIONAL SECURITY Alka Pradhan Alka Pradhan is a lecturer in law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and is human rights counsel at the Guantanamo Bay Military Commissions, representing one of the 9/11 accused. Pradhan has long worked at the crossroads of international human rights and national security. She is a frequent commentator in the media on international law and counterterrorism issues, ranging from force-feeding at Guantanamo Bay to the application of human rights law to detention operations in Iraq. While in private practice at White & Case LLP, Pradhan participated in sovereign litigations and other cases involving public international law, including use of the Alien Tort Statute. In her pro bono practice, she represents asylum-seekers and advises NGOs on litigation before international criminal tribunals and the European Court of Human Rights. Her work was profiled in a New York Times Magazine feature "Alka Pradhan v. Gitmo" in 2017. Pradhan earned her B.A. and M.A. from Johns Hopkins University, her J.D. from Columbia Law School, and an LL.M. from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Stephen Vladeck Stephen Vladeck holds the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law. He is a nationally recognized expert on federal courts, constitutional law, national security law, and military justice. Vladeck has argued multiple cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Texas Supreme Court, and lower federal civilian and military courts. He is co-host of the award-winning "National Security Law" podcast. He is CNN's Supreme Court analyst, a co-author of Aspen Publishers' leading national security law and counterterrorism law casebooks, an executive editor of the "Just Security" blog, and a senior editor of the "Lawfare" blog. Vladeck clerked for the Hon. Marsha S. Berzon on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Hon. Rosemary Barkett on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. While a law student, he was the student director of the Balancing Civil Liberties & National Security post-9/11 litigation project. He earned his B.A., summa cum laude, in history and mathematics from Amherst College and his J.D. from Yale Law School. William Banks William C. Banks is a Board of Advisors Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Syracuse University College of Law. From 2015-16, Banks served as interim dean of the College of Law. Banks was the founding director of the Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism, now the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law. He is a highly regarded and internationally recognized scholar. His research focuses on constitutional law and national security, counterterrorism, laws of war and asymmetric warfare, cyber conflict, civilian-military relations, and government surveillance and privacy. The subjects of Banks's more than 160 published book chapters and articles range from the military use of unmanned aerial vehicles and the role of the military in domestic affairs to cyberespionage, cyber attribution, and the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. He is editor of the Journal of National Security Law & Policy and chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Law and National Security.
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Compilation – May 28, 2020 Courtesy of Cornerstone Government Affairs
    COVID-19 Compilation – May 28, 2020 Courtesy of Cornerstone Government Affairs Common Acronyms Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Central Command (CENTCOM), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) Washington, D.C. • HRSA awarded $15 million to 52 Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban Indian health organizations, and other health services providers to Tribes across 20 states to prepare, prevent, and respond to COVID-19 in rural tribal communities. View the list of awards here. • The FDA is hosting a virtual Town Hall on June 3rd at 12:15 PM for clinical laboratories and commercial manufacturers that are developing or have developed diagnostic tests for COVID-19. The purpose of this Town Hall is to help answer technical questions about the development and validation of tests for COVID- 19. • Vice President Mike Pence met with members of the American Camp Association by phone and led a discussion with camp owners and operators across the country to discuss the approach to safely and responsibly reopening summer camps amid COVID-19. A brief readout is available here. • The CDC published more new COVID-19 documents to its dashboard today. Some highlights are: screening for COVID-19 at homeless shelters and encampments, how to wash cloth face coverings, and resources for child care, schools, and youth programs to help plan for reopening.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks at a White House Coronavirus Task Force Press Briefing March 31, 2020
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks at a White House Coronavirus Task Force Press Briefing March 31, 2020 The President. Thank you very much, everyone. Our country is in the midst of a great national trial, unlike any we have ever faced before. You all see it. You see it probably better than most. We're at war with a deadly virus. Success in this fight will require the full, absolute measure of our collective strength, love, and devotion. Very important. Each of us has the power, through our own choices and actions, to save American lives and rescue the most vulnerable among us. That's why we really have to do what we all know is right. Every citizen is being called upon to make sacrifices. Every business is being asked to fulfill its patriotic duty. Every community is making fundamental changes to how we live, work, and interact each and every day. And I wouldn't be surprised to see this going on long into the future, when this virus is gone and defeated. Some of the things we're doing now will be very good practice for the future, including for not getting the flu, which is very devastating also. So some of what we're learning now will live on into the future—I really believe that: shaking hands or not shaking hands, washing hands all the time, staying a little apart. Fifteen days ago, we published our nationwide guidelines to slow the spread of the virus. On Sunday, I announced that this campaign will be extended until April 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Branch
    EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, Senator from Illinois and 44th President of the United States; born in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 4, 1961; received a B.A. in 1983 from Columbia University, New York City; worked as a community organizer in Chicago, IL; studied law at Harvard University, where he became the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review, and received a J.D. in 1991; practiced law in Chicago, IL; lecturer on constitutional law, University of Chicago; member, Illinois State Senate, 1997–2004; elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2004; and served from January 3, 2005, to November 16, 2008, when he resigned from office, having been elected President; family: married to Michelle; two children: Malia and Sasha; elected as President of the United States on November 4, 2008, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2009. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Barack H. Obama. Special Assistant to the President and Personal Aide to the President.— Anita Decker Breckenridge. Director of Oval Office Operations.—Brian Mosteller. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Bruce Reed, EEOB, room 276, 456–9000. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Dr. Jill Biden.—Sheila Nix, EEOB, room 200, 456–7458.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Hampshire Gazette, Friday, April 10, 2020 — Page 1
    The New Hampshire Gazette, Friday, April 10, 2020 — Page 1 Vol. CCLXIV, No. 15 The New Hampshire Gazette Grab Me! April 10, 2020 The Nation’s Oldest Newspaper™ • Editor: Steven Fowle • Founded 1756 by Daniel Fowle PO Box 756, Portsmouth, NH 03802 • [email protected] • www.nhgazette.com I’m Free! The Fortnightly Rant The Big X-Ray ast weekend Covid-19 was As the sordid life of Allen Dulles† killing a thousand Americans a demonstrates, the Prime Directive Lday. If the death rate doubles every of the U.S. Government has been six days or so, this weekend we’ll say to defend capitalism against all en- goodbye to 4,000 more. emies, foreign and domestic. This is, of course, quite terrible. After letting the world’s #1 Bol- It certainly seems so right now. All shevik scamper off to overthrow the things being relative, though, and Russian Empire, Allen, the inveter- the laws of mathematics being as ate horndog and unregenerate con- they are [the exponential function spirator, joined his staid and stuffy has a power that Bill Barr can only brother John Foster at Cromwell & envy] a month or two from now we Sullivan, the world’s most powerful may look back and see these as the corporate law firm. Their clients,ipso good old days. facto, were the world’s most powerful Remember the bumper sticker, corporations. “Giant Meteor 2016—Just End It Even after purportedly leaving Already”? The comet never came, corporate law—Allen becoming but we got the next-worst thing: Eisenhower’s CIA Director, John umpteen trillion itsy-bitsy blobs Foster his Secretary of State—they of ribonucleic acid are giving this continued serving the same clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol. 9, No. 2 Prism About Vol
    2 021 PRISMVOL. 9, NO. 2 | 2021 PRISM VOL. 9, NO. 2 NO. 9, VOL. THE JOURNAL OF COMPLEX OPER ATIONS PRISM ABOUT VOL. 9, NO. 2, 2021 PRISM, the quarterly journal of complex operations published at National Defense University (NDU), aims to illuminate and provoke debate on whole-of-government EDITOR IN CHIEF efforts to conduct reconstruction, stabilization, counterinsurgency, and irregular Mr. Michael Miklaucic warfare operations. Since the inaugural issue of PRISM in 2010, our readership has expanded to include more than 10,000 officials, servicemen and women, and practi- tioners from across the diplomatic, defense, and development communities in more COPYEDITOR than 80 countries. Ms. Andrea L. Connell PRISM is published with support from NDU’s Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS). In 1984, Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger established INSS EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS within NDU as a focal point for analysis of critical national security policy and Ms. Taylor Buck defense strategy issues. Today INSS conducts research in support of academic and Ms. Amanda Dawkins leadership programs at NDU; provides strategic support to the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and armed services; Ms. Alexandra Fabre de la Grange and engages with the broader national and international security communities. Ms. Julia Humphrey COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET PUBLICATIONS PRISM welcomes unsolicited manuscripts from policymakers, practitioners, and EDITOR scholars, particularly those that present emerging thought, best practices, or train- Ms. Joanna E. Seich ing and education innovations. Publication threshold for articles and critiques varies but is largely determined by topical relevance, continuing education for national and DESIGN international security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • S Ing 2018 Cours
    018 Cours Sing 2 Letter From the Executive Director Another year has begun, the Bayer Center’s nineteenth year of work and service to our vigorous, More than a village, it’s going to take a sector to solve these challenges. But let’s review what we active, questing nonprofit community…this year will be one in which we continue to explore the know about our fellow nonprofits. They are tenacious, resourceful, determined, on occasion fierce questions of leadership and efficacy of the nonprofit sector. In late January, we will release the in their service, ready to work against significant odds, filled with talented, educated, caring people. findings of our latest research, What Now? How will the impending retirement of nonprofit leaders This is only part of what I know from all my years working beside and with you. Like our Rosie the change the sector?. Although it clearly is also What’s Next?, we titled it What Now?. Because what Riveter icon, WE CAN DO IT…if we’ll talk about it and confront the challenges and rise to the needs we found was this huge story of change, loss and opportunity is not one that has received much of society one more time! attention. Although individual organizations may be confronting this reality, it does not seem that we as a group are figuring out strategies for replacing what could be 69% of our current workforce over Let us find common cause in the beauty of our missions, the necessity of our work and our love for the next ten years…nor are we effectively addressing how best to grow our younger leaders into each other and our beloved community.
    [Show full text]
  • Duquesne Law Review
    DUQUESNE LAW REVIEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THINKING ABOUT LAW, LAW PRACTICE, AND LEGAL EDUCATION FOREWORD Jan M. Levine SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES THE GHOST IN THE MACHINE: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Emily Janoski-Haehlen & IN LAW SCHOOLS Sarah Starnes THE AUTOMATION OF LEGAL REASONING: CUSTOMIZED AI TECHNIQUES FOR THE PATENT FIELD Dean Alderucci MIND THE GAP: TECHNOLOGY AS A LIFELINE FOR PRO SE CHILD CUSTODY APPEALS Katherine L.W. Norton AI REPORT: HUMANITY IS DOOMED. SEND LAWYERS, Ashley M. London & GUNS, AND MONEY! James B. Schreiber MURRAY EXCELLENCE IN SCHOLARSHIP LECTURE James Forman Jr. STUDENT ARTICLES SAVING THE ELECTRONIC PERSON FROM DIGITAL ASSAULT: THE CASE FOR MORE ROBUST PROTECTIONS OVER OUR ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS Danielle M. Mrdjenovich THE GUTTING OF THE PEER REVIEW PROTECTION ACT: HOW REGINELLI V. BOGGS WEAKENED THE PROTECTION OF MEDICAL PEER REVIEW IN PENNSYLVANIA AND WHY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MUST ACT TO RESTORE THAT PROTECTION Samuel C. Nolan “GRANDFAMILIES” AMID THE OPIOID CRISIS: AN INCREASING REASON TO UPDATE PENNSYLVANIA’S OUTDATED INTESTACY LAWS Joanne L. Parise ILLEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE: RESOLVING THE FUNDAMENTAL FLAW IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS INVOLVING PHYSICIANS CHARGED WITH OVERPRESCRIBING PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS Jacob C. Hanley VOLUME 58, NUMBER 1 WINTER 2020 Duquesne Law Review Volume 58, Number 1, Winter 2020 © DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY, 2019-2020 Artificial Intelligence: Thinking About Law, Law Practice, and Legal Education Foreword Jan M. Levine................................................................................................................. 1 Symposium Articles THE GHOST IN THE MACHINE: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LAW SCHOOLS Emily Janoski-Haehlen & Sarah Starnes .................................................................... 3 THE AUTOMATION OF LEGAL REASONING: CUSTOMIZED AI TECHNIQUES FOR THE PATENT FIELD Dean Alderucci............................................................................................................. 50 MIND THE GAP: TECHNOLOGY AS A LIFELINE FOR PRO SE CHILD CUSTODY APPEALS Katherine L.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Capehart
    Jonathan Capehart Award-winning journalist Jonathan Capehart is anchor of The Sunday Show with Jonathan Capehart on MSNBC and also an opinion writer and member of the editorial board of The Washington Post, where he hosts the podcast, Cape Up. In 1999, he was on the editorial board at the New York Daily News that won a Pulitzer Prize for the paper’s series of editorials that helped save Harlem’s Apollo Theater. He was also named an Esteem Honoree in 2011. In 2014, The Advocate magazine ranked him nineth out of fifty of the most influential LGBT people in media. In December 2014, Mediaite named him one of the “Top Nine Rising Stars of Cable News.” Equality Forum made him a 2018 LGBT History Month Icon in October. In May 2018, the publisher of the Washington Post awarded him an “Outstanding Contribution Award” for his opinion writing and “Cape Up” podcast interviews. Mr. Capehart first worked as assistant to the president of the WNYC Foundation. He then became a researcher for NBC's The Today Show. From 1993 to 2000, he served as a member of the New York Daily News’ editorial board. Mr. Capehart then went on to work as a national affairs columnist for Bloomberg News from 2000 to 2001, and later served as a policy advisor for Michael Bloomberg in his successful 2001 campaign for Mayor of New York City. In 2002, he returned to the New York Daily News, where he worked as deputy editorial page editor until 2004, when he was hired as senior vice president and senior counselor of public affairs for Hill & Knowlton.
    [Show full text]
  • War on Drugs": Free the P.O.W.S
    California Western Law Review Volume 55 Number 1 Article 8 12-20-2018 The Sobering Failure of America's "War on Drugs": Free the P.O.W.s Meagan K. Nettles Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Nettles, Meagan K. (2018) "The Sobering Failure of America's "War on Drugs": Free the P.O.W.s," California Western Law Review: Vol. 55 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol55/iss1/8 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nettles: The Sobering Failure of America's "War on Drugs": Free the P.O.W FINAL Nettles camera ready (Do Not Delete) 1/8/2019 10:26 AM COMMENTS THE SOBERING FAILURE OF AMERICA’S “WAR ON DRUGS”: FREE THE P.O.W.S TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 276 I. THE EVOLUTION OF SENTENCING POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES ................................................................................... 282 A. The Development of Indeterminate Sentencing and the Rehabilitative Model ......................................................... 282 B. The Shift to Determinative Sentencing with a Punitive Purpose ............................................................................. 284 C. The Ebb and Flow of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Policy and the War on Drugs............................................ 286 D. Tension Between Judicial, Congressional, and the Commission’s Power to Determine Drug Crime Sentencing ......................................................................... 289 E. How Punitive Are Mandatory Minimum Sentences? ......... 292 F. Second Class Citizens: The Continued Oppression of Collateral Consequences .................................................. 294 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech
    Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech David Supp-Montgomerie A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication Studies in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Christian Lundberg V. William Balthrop Carole Blair Lawrence Grossberg William Keith © 2013 David Supp-Montgomerie ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT David Supp-Montgomerie: Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech (Under the direction of Christian Lundberg) This dissertation is a critique of the idea that the artifice of public speech is a problem to be solved. This idea is shown to entail the privilege attributed to purportedly direct or unmediated speech in U.S. public culture. I propose that we attend to the ēthos producing effects of rhetorical concealment by asserting that all public speech is constituted through rhetorical artifice. Wherever an alternative to rhetoric is offered, one finds a rhetoric of non-rhetoric at work. A primary strategy in such rhetoric is the performance of sincerity. In this dissertation, I analyze the function of sincerity in contexts of public deliberation. I seek to show how claims to sincerity are strategic, demonstrate how claims that a speaker employs artifice have been employed to imply a lack of sincerity, and disabuse communication, rhetoric, and deliberative theory of the notion that sincere expression occurs without technology. In Chapter Two I begin with the original problem of artifice for rhetoric in classical Athens in the writings of Plato and Isocrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Generals
    STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY - PERSPECTIVE Trump’s Generals: A Natural Experiment in Civil-Military Relations JAMES JOYNER Abstract President Donald Trump’s filling of numerous top policy positions with active and retired officers he called “my generals” generated fears of mili- tarization of foreign policy, loss of civilian control of the military, and politicization of the military—yet also hope that they might restrain his worst impulses. Because the generals were all gone by the halfway mark of his administration, we have a natural experiment that allows us to com- pare a Trump presidency with and without retired generals serving as “adults in the room.” None of the dire predictions turned out to be quite true. While Trump repeatedly flirted with civil- military crises, they were not significantly amplified or deterred by the presence of retired generals in key roles. Further, the pattern continued in the second half of the ad- ministration when “true” civilians filled these billets. Whether longer-term damage was done, however, remains unresolved. ***** he presidency of Donald Trump served as a natural experiment, testing many of the long- debated precepts of the civil-military relations (CMR) literature. His postelection interviewing of Tmore than a half dozen recently retired four- star officers for senior posts in his administration unleashed a torrent of columns pointing to the dangers of further militarization of US foreign policy and damage to the military as a nonpartisan institution. At the same time, many argued that these men were uniquely qualified to rein in Trump’s worst pro- clivities. With Trump’s tenure over, we can begin to evaluate these claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Insight 2020
    ELECTION INSIGHT 2020 “This isn’t about – yeah, it is about me, I guess, when you think about it.” – President Donald J. Trump Kenosha Wisconsin Regional Airport Election Eve. 1 • Election Insight 2020 Contents 04 … Election Results on One Page 06 … Biden Transition Team 10 … Potential Biden Administration 2 • Election Insight 2020 Election Results on One Page 3 • Election Insight 2020 DENTONS’ DEMOCRATS Election Results on One Page “The waiting is the hardest part.” Election results as of 1:15 pm November 11th – Tom Petty Top Line Biden declared by multiple news networks to be America’s next president. Biden’s Pennsylvania win puts him over 270. Georgia and North Carolina not yet called. Biden narrowly leads in GA while Trump leads in NC. Trump campaign seeks recounts in GA and Wisconsin and files multiple lawsuits seeking to overturn the election results in states where Biden has won. Two January 5, 2021 runoff elections in Georgia will determine Senate control. Senator Mitch McConnell will remain Majority Leader and divided government will continue, complicating the prospects for Biden’s legislative agenda, unless Democrats win both runoff s. Democrats retain their House majority but Republicans narrow the Democrats’ margin with a net pickup of six seats. Incumbents Losing Reelection • Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL) • Rep. Harley Rouda (D-CA-48) • Rep. Xochitl Torres Small (D-NM-3) • Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) • Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-FL-26) • Rep. Max Rose (D-NY-11) • Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) • Rep. Donna Shalala (D-FL-27) • Rep. Kendra Horn (D-OK-5) • Rep.
    [Show full text]