DOCSLIB.ORG

(ARM) Program: Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(ARM) Program: Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) Site a(;l'7' ANt/EAiSfTM-Be 'Jr' DOeEA'0680 Environmental Assessment for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) Site Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division Afgorsna National Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago, under Contract W-3t-tO9*Eng-38, for ft© United States Department of Energy TMI5 rVVM IMPKST tR I IN! Argonne National Laboratory Argonna, National Laboratory,, with, facilities, in. the. states of Illinois, and Idaho, ia owned: by the United; States government, and; operated by to University of Chicago- under the provisions of s contract with the Pepgrtrrtant ot Energy. This- technical memo is g. product of Argonne'g. E-nvironrmintal' ftssasamsnE and Information Sciences (EAIS) pivNon-, FOP informationi orn th» division; a scientific and.: engineering activities, contact; Director, Environmental1 Assessment and: Information Sctances Division Argonne National: Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 6G439-4at-s Telephone goa), 252-075$ Preaantect in ttfe technical memo are preliminary results of gngoing work op work that is rrtorgi limited' in acopa finrt ttepth than thaE deacnbacj! in forms!1 reports laauedi by the E-AI3 Diviaion. Disclaimer Tnia report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of th& United: State* Govommont, Naithet the United States Government noc any agency thereof, nac any of thoif smployees, makaa any warranty-,. express or implied, or assumes any legal liability OF responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed1, or represents that its use wraulc! not infringe privately owned righto. Roterene& herein to any specific commerciali product, process, or service by trade namo, tradamark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its ondoraomont, recommendation, or favoring by tho United Statgs GovommonS of any agency thereof, Tho views and opinions, of authors: QxproaaQd1 heroin eld not necessarily state or reflect thoao of) tho United States Govommunf of any agency thereof. Reproduti etf ditectfy ftom tho I ' Available to DOE anrf DOE cvfttraztoes from the Office ot Ssi'eflf/'ifc and Technical infcematiM, P.O. Box 62. Onk Ridjge, TN 37331; prices avaifatte tram Available to tfte public from tha National Technical Mamiatian Sen/ics, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Pott Royal Road. Springfield, VA &161. Environmental Assessment for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Southern Great Plains Cloud arid Radiation Testbed (CART1} Site by A.J. Poltcasfre,, AM. Pflngatoit,. 0,M. Maloney. F. Waamer* EnvironmeniaE Assessment and Information Sciences National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne. Illinois 60439 March t992 sponsored by United States Department of Energy. Office of Energy Research, Office of HggRh and Environment! Research. Atmospheric and Climate Research Drviston lASTER DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED Executive Summary The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program is- aimed at supplying improved predictive capability of climate change, particularly the prediction of cloutRiimate feedback. The abjective wEl be achieved by measuring the atmospheric radiation and physical and meteorological quantities, that control solar radiation in the earth's atmosphere and using this information to test global elimate and related models. The proposed- action is to construct and operate » Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART! research site in the southern- Great Plains, as, pail of the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation, Measurement Program whose objective is. u» develop an improved predictive capability of global climate change. The putpose of thts- CART research site tit southern Kansas, ynd nonhcm Ofclahoma would be to- collect meteorological and: othsr scientific information to betffip characterize the processes controlling radiation transfer on a global scale, thereby expanding DOE"* knowledge of the suspected enhanced greenhouse effect and any assueiatet! global wanning. The CART site proposed for the southern Great Plains covers an «re« 325 km x 2?5 km which is larger than the minimum conceptual design of a 20« km x 2TO km square. However, due to the disbursed nature of the instrumentation located on the CART site, it would be necessary to tease only a small portion of this area in order to implement the proposed action. The proposed CART site would be comprised of a- single central facility {160 acres), six auxiliary facilities (50- 100- acres each); approximately 25 extended facilities (50-100 acres each), and wp to six boundary facilities (50--100 acres each). Thus, of the nearly 22 million acres within the proposed CART site area, only 3t8'60 acres would need to be teased for these widely disbursed data collection facilities. Of the total teased acreage, about 2t acres would be secured by fence-line and the surface within the fenced areas would not be disturbed except foe the placemen! of instruments and associated facilities. The total surface area disturbed for concrete pads to support such hems as trailers. storage facilities, tnd housing facilities is estimated to be less than 12 acres, ft is proposed to operate the CART site around-the-ctoek for up to lf> years with up to 36 technical siaff persons. At the close of the 10 year operating period, alt facilities and equipment would be removed and the land returned to its, previous use. Air quality impacts of placement and operation would be very minor since only a small amount of clearing and a small amount of leveling would be needed. State of Oklahoma regulations on fugitive dust mitigation (e.g.. watering to reduce emissions) would be followed during the construction. N'*ise impacts to nearby residents were evaluated for the potentially noisy 50- and 915- MHz peofttur/RadtP Acoustic Sounding Systems (RASSs). The noise from those instruments represent a tow (for 50 MHz RASS} or high (For 915 MHz RASS) frequency tone that occurs 5-6 minutes of every 3f> or 60 minutes. The results were that: I. The 50-MHz profiler/RASS was found to be acceptable at the central facility for the proposed action and each of the alternatives. The baffled 50 MHz tit pro file r/RASS was. found; to be acceptable at the boundary sites for each of the proposed actions and for some (but not all) of the proposed: alternatives. 2. The 915-MH2 RASS system was found; to be acceptable at all proposed sites and alternatives, including: the central facility and: the six. boundary facilities. Research aircraft would occasionally carry out tow-level passes at 500 ft above ground level The proposed aircraft would: cause momentary speech interference for people under the flight path, a minor impact resource impacts would be very minor/, mth the requirement for two boundary facilities. (MeCtaim and Gkmutgee County)) that construction and operational activities would be out in specified subportions of the sites &» avoid tluodpl'ain and wetlands areas. Impacts, to- vegetation, and wildlife would be low and temporary. No threatened or endangered species would be at risk. Land use impacts, would be very low because of the limited area! requirements, of the project, Tht project impacts to visual resources surrounding each site would be low. The only structure in the entice project that would be visible from a vantage point «!' greater- than two- miles would be the central facility's 60-tn meteorological tower. The impacts. U> cultural resources would be minor. The state historical preservation officers (SHPO) of Oklahoma and Kansas, indicated that none of the proposed or alternative sites for facilities contains structures or sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The lower elevation of the Marion County (Kansas); site may contain archewUxgicul sites, but these areas would be strictly avoided. Soeioeconoroics impacts would be minimal. Some minor economic benefits would occur in the vicinity of each proposed site, but these would consist of brief employment (30 days maximum) for only a few workers and the local purchase of support materials. Because the ARM Project activities are located in isolated rural areas where there is very little activity other than farming, the cumulative impacts would be negligible. Furthermore, this project represents new effort and has no cumulative impacts with any previous DOE work or with any other federal projects. The no action alternative would be the toss of a U.S. site, which would be detrimental to the scientific study of global warming. The toss of the U.S. site would severely limit the ability of the project t» vastly improve models and to make appropriate policy decisions on global climate change. IV Contents Acronyms and Definitions. xti t Description; of Proposed Action: and; Alternatives I -1 LL Purpose and Need . M 1.2 Experimental Design,,, .„ , ...,,. 1-2 12,1 The Site Screenrog Process ,,... 1-3 122 Firat Level Screening.. , 1-3 1.23 Second Level Screening ,...,, , 1-6 t. 3 Details, &i the Proposed Action in Oklahoma antl Kansas I-8 t.3.1 Site Selection I-»J 1,3,2 Instruments. S - 2ft t.4 Mo Action Alternative ., S-3«$ 2 Affected; Environment , ., 2-1 2.1 Suite ami Geology 2*1 2.1.1; Grant County. Oklahoma Central Facility......... 2-1 2. t .2 McCtato County. Oklahoma, Boundary Facility............. ....... 2-1 2.13 Qkmulgee County. Oklahoma. Boundary Facility 24 2AA Woodward County,, Ofciahoma. BouRdary Facility 2-2 2.1.5 KiovvaCounty, Kansas,, Boundary Facility 2-2 2•. 1.6 Marion Couttty, Kansas, Boundary Facility 2-2 2.1.1 Montgomery County, Kansas, Boundary Facility 2-2 2.2 Water Resources........ 2-3 2,2. t Surface Water Quality 2-3 2.2.2 Orounawater Quality 2-4 2.2.3 Wetlands... 2-6 2.2.4 Ftoodplains 2-8 2.3 Air Quality 2-9 2.4 Noise...... 2-10 2.4J Grant County. Oklahoma, Central Facility....... 2-M) 2.4.2 McCtain County, Oklahoma, Boundary Facility........... 2-11 2.4.3 Okmulgee County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Creek National Capitol and or common Creek Council House 2. Location street & number Sixth S tree t Grand Ave . not for publication city, town Okmulgee __ vicinity of state Oklahoma code 40 county Okmulgee code HI 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use X district public occupied agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process __ yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name City of Okmulgee (c/o Councilhouse Board current chairman: Cleo Wallace) (Ms. T.A. Sunshine King, Director, Creek Council House street & number ————————————————-———————————————————————Museum) city, town Okmulgee vicinity of state Oklahoma 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. County Clerk street & number Okmulgee County Courthose city, town Okmulgee state Oklahoma 6, Representation in Existing Surveys tme_ has this property been determined eligible? yes ^ no date federal _ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __„ excellent __ deteriorated unaltered x original site .JC_ good . __ ruins X altered moved date __fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Creek National Capitol is located on a pleasantly landscaped square city block in downtown Okmulgee, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks
    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 1, 2018 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, John Redmond Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, LaCygne Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Pomona Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 25 - 40 inch slot limit with no more than 1 fish 40-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and forty (40) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Milford Reservoir 25 - 35 inch slot limit with no more than 2 fish 35-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: El Dorado Reservoir 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andale-Renwick USD 267 Pond, Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge Bowl 2020
    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism
    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism Alan Stark Supervisor – Arkansas & Neosho Regions Kansas State Parks Wilson State Park KANSAS OUTDOOR RECREATION ECONOMY •71,000 Direct Jobs •$7.3 Billion in Consumer Spending •$1.8 Billion in Wages & Salaries •$481 Million in State and Local Tax Revenue KANSAS STATE PARKS PARK FEE FUND BALANCE • 2018 Visitation – 6,897,836 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 • Facilities – 463 $4,000,000 FY 2013 $3,000,000 FY • Park Offices – 22 2014 FY 2015 $2,000,000 FY 2016 FY • Miles of Road – 400 $1,000,000 2017 $- • Boat Ramp Lanes - 173 Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Reclamation • Clinton State Park • Cedar Bluff State Park • Cross Timbers State Park • Cheney State Park • Eisenhower State Park • El Dorado State Park • Glen Elder State Park • Elk City State Park • Lovewell State Park • Fall River State Park • Prairie Dog State Park • Hillsdale State Park • Webster State Park • Kanopolis State Park • Milford State Park • Perry State Park • Pomona State Park • Tuttle Creek State Park • Wilson State Park HAB – Blue Green Algae • Cheney State Park • Glen Elder State Park • Lovewell State Park • Meade State Park • Milford State Park • Prairie Dog State Park • Historic Lake Scott State Park • Webster State Park Effects of Blue Green Algae on Meade State Park Two consecutive years of blooms hurt park visitation and revenue • 2010 Visitation down 15,954 with $16,384.00 lost revenue • 2010 Park shut down to all water activities • 2011 Visitation down 31,525 with $37,247.00 lost revenue • 2011 No swimming and boating discouraged
    [Show full text]
  • July-August 2017 Master Pieces JULY - AUGUST Magazine of Mid-America Running Association 2017
    MASTER PIECES Magazine of Mid-America Running Association July-August 2017 Master Pieces JULY - AUGUST Magazine of Mid-America Running Association 2017 www.mararunning.org This Issue Get Active! **************** For Good! By: Renee Kidwell 2 Karen’s Column Renee Kidwell 3 Happy 4th of July! Enjoying the Outdoors 4-5 Color Storm 5K It was a Friday afternoon at work as things were winding down 6 Bio on KC’s -Ralph Hall MD and folks, eager for a few days off ,were chatting about plans 7 Roberta’s Recipes-Tasty -Traveling for the weekend. A co-worker asked me what I was going to be 8-9 Mother’s Day 5K doing over the next few days. Before I answered, my mind went 10 Night Hawk 50K/10&20 Miler to the ‘To-do list’ I had created the night before. It seems that 11 Summer Running Tips there are always a variety of tasks, chores and projects that eagerly 12-13 5K Home Run await the weekend hours. I wasn’t going to share the whole list with them, so I quickly answered that I had a lot of yard work, Cover Photo: Trae Rickford with his mowing & weeding to do. The response I received, “Oh, I hate Sweet Escort toward the finish doing that kind of stuff”. My reply, Well, I love being outside 5K Home Run-Lawrence whether, working, playing, or relaxing. I’m stuck in an office building most of the week, so when I’m home, it’s outdoors for Photo by: Gene Wee me.
    [Show full text]
  • Water in Kansas State Parks
    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism Linda S. Lanterman Director Kansas State Parks Wilson State Park KANSAS OUTDOOR RECREATION ECONOMY •71,000 Direct Jobs •$7.3 Billion in Consumer Spending •$1.8 Billion in Wages & Salaries •$481 Million in State and Local Tax Revenue https://outdoorindustry.org/state/kansas/ KANSAS STATE PARKS • 2018 Visitation – 6,897,836 • 2019 Visitation 4,663,132 • Facilities – 463 • Park Offices – 22 • Miles of Paved Road – 534 • 81 Miles Flooded • Boat Ramp Lanes – 173 lanes on 80 Ramps • 62 Boat Ramps were Flooded KANSAS STATE PARKS PARK FEE FUND BALANCE $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 FY 2013 $3,000,000 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 $2,000,000 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 $1,000,000 $- Army Corps of Engineers Clinton State Park – KS City Vault Toilet Building Cross Timbers State Park - Tulsa Eisenhower State Park – KS City El Dorado State Park - Tulsa Elk City State Park - Tulsa Fall River State Park - Tulsa Hillsdale State Park – KS City Kanopolis State Park – KS City Milford State Park – KS City Perry State Park – KS City Pomona State Park – KS City Tuttle Creek State Park – KS City Wilson State Park – KS City Flood Control/Water Supply Bureau of Reclamation KDWPT • Cedar Bluff State Park - NE • Crawford State Park • Cheney State Park - OK • Flint Hills Trail State Park • Glen Elder State Park - NE • Historic Lake Scott State Park • Lovewell State Park - NE • Kaw River State Park • Prairie Dog State Park - NE • Little Jerusalem Badlands State Park • Webster State Park - NE • Meade State Park • Mushroom Rock
    [Show full text]
  • March, 2003 Newsletter.Pmd
    The Kansas Trails Council Established in 1974 Volume XXIX No. 1 Newsletter March, 2003 Me and Faraji In December, me and Faraji joined in a trail By Stephen Garlow maintenance work day on the Clinton Lake North Shore Trails. Mike Goodwin, trail coordinator and KTC Board [Author’s preface: When I was a kid, two of my favorite Member, equipped us with two sets of long-handled books were Me and Caleb and Me and Caleb Again, by loppers and we lopped until we nearly dropped. We Franklyn E. Meyer. These were collections of tales about thought our arms were going to fall out of their sockets. childhood and the adventures of two boys in a small town But the results were gratifying because we helped to re- at the edge of the Ozarks.] open several miles of trail in the far-western area of the Growing up in the Ozarks of Southwest Missouri, Park that had become overgrown through lack of much of the “fun stuff” that I did was in the outdoors. maintenance. We quickly depleted my supply of granola From the age of seven I was often sandwiched between bars and snack crackers while we were on the trail. Later my father and my uncle in a small johnboat as we floated in the afternoon I was both amazed and amused as my the Elk River, catching our limit of brownies (small nine-year-old friend devoured a Giant Roast Beef mouth bass). This was during the days before length Sandwich meal at Arby’s. limits and catch-and-release.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (Wraps) Project Elk City Lake Watershed Assessment Final Report
    KANSAS WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY (WRAPS) PROJECT ELK CITY LAKE WATERSHED ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT KDHE Project No. 2007-0061 March 2012 Prepared and Submitted by: Dr. Kyle R. Douglas-Mankin, Principal Investigator Dr. Aleksey Y. Sheshukov Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Kansas State University 129 Seaton Hall Manhattan KS 66506 785-532-2911 [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 Goals, Objectives, and Tasks ............................................................................................. 10 Summary of Project Activities and Accomplishments ...................................................... 11 Next Steps / Transition into WRAPS Assessment Phase ................................................... 25 Evaluation of How Well Goals, Objectives and Tasks Were Met ...................................... 26 Conclusions, Recommendations, and Lessons Learned ................................................... 28 References ........................................................................................................................ 30 Appendix A Watershed Atlas ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of the Creek Indians from the Southeast, 1825-1838
    THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this dissertation is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This dissertation does not include proprietary or classified information. ____________________________ Christopher D. Haveman Certificate of Approval: ____________________________ ____________________________ Kenneth W. Noe Kathryn E. Holland Braund, Chair Professor Professor History History ____________________________ ____________________________ David C. Carter John Saye Professor Professor History Education ____________________________ George T. Flowers Dean Graduate School THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 10, 2009 THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this dissertation at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ________________________________ Signature of Author ________________________________ Date of Graduation iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Doctor of Philosophy, August 10, 2009 (M.A. Auburn University, 2006) (M.A. Marquette University, 2001) (B.A. Western Washington University, 1998) 407 Typed Pages Directed by Kathryn E. Holland Braund This dissertation examines the removal of approximately twenty-three thousand Creek Indians from Alabama and Georgia to present-day Oklahoma between 1825 and 1838. At its height, the Creek Nation encompassed most of the present-day states of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Fish Consumption Advisories Issued / 1-7-16 / Weekly News / News / KDWPT Info / KDWPT - KDWPT
    2016 Fish Consumption Advisories Issued / 1-7-16 / Weekly News / News / KDWPT Info / KDWPT - KDWPT | Like 0 2016 Fish Consumption Advisories Issued Tweet TOPEKA – The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) and the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism (KDWPT) are issuing revised fish consumption advisories for 2016. The advisories identify types of fish or other aquatic animals that should be eaten in limited quantities or, in some cases, avoided altogether because of contamination. General advice is also provided to aid the public in making informed decisions regarding the benefits as well as the risks associated with eating locally caught fish from Kansas waters. Statewide Advisories The following consumption restrictions are recommended because of mercury in fish: Women who are pregnant, may become pregnant, or are nursing and children age 17 or younger should restrict consumption of all types of locally caught fish, from waters or species of fish not specifically covered by an advisory, to one meal per week because of mercury. Women who are pregnant, may become pregnant, or are nursing and children age 17 or younger should restrict consumption of largemouth, smallmouth, and spotted bass (black basses) to one meal per month because of mercury. The general public (men and women 18 or older)should restrict consumption of these species to one meal per week because of mercury. Recommendations include not eating specified fish or aquatic life from the following locations: 1. The Kansas Riverfrom Lawrence (below Bowersock Dam) downstream to Eudora at the confluence of the Wakarusa River (Douglas and Leavenworth counties); bottom-feeding fish such as buffalo, carp, carpsuckers, catfishes (except flathead catfish), sturgeons, and suckers because of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
    [Show full text]
  • For Free Distribution © 03 .E «/> 0 RECREATION AREAS Cn CL C © CO 4= §> - C E -O 1
    - BICYCLE MAP For Free Distribution © 03 .E «/> 0 RECREATION AREAS cn CL C © CO 4= §> - c E -O 1. CO C Bicycling Resources t | o cd ® Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism 5 K P t o Y C 3 Q CD -O <u 0 3 X CO CD c Q (620) 672-5911, KSOutdoors.com CO 03 0 3 C jg 2* 0 O 2 c k_ C o © CL CL £ © oi § c cr <3 CT ® -C These links are provided as information only The Kansas Department • U S. Army Corp of Engineers *5 E © $ E — tr u © I E s © C o CO CO ^ co 2 co k_ CD © O' x: o Full Utility Full Electrical of Transportation makes no representations or warranties of any kind, Hunting Fishing ID o CL Map Name Phone o cr CO O Trails ID CO CD i 5 <§ <3 £ expressed or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, or sui - ability of the information presented in these websites F-11 Big Hill Reservoir* (620) 336-2741 D-5 Cedar Bluff State Park and Reservoir (785) 726-3212 Cheney State Park and Reservoir Kansas Cyclist - A comprehensive collection of Kansas cycling E-8 (316) 542-3664 D-7 Cheyenne Bottoms Wildlife Area (620) 793-3066 • • • resources, including events, bike shops, route guides, and more F-2 Cimarron National Grassland (620) 697-4621 • • • • • www.kansascvclist.com C-11 Clinton Reservoir • (785) 843-7665 C-11 Clinton State Park (785) 842-8562 • • Bike Walk KC - A nonprofit organization that works to make the L/D -11 0v CouncilW V U 1 1 wl 1 GroveW 1 V ? W 1Reservoir AW JWl V wll • (620) 767-5195 Kansas City region a safer and more accessible place to walk, F-12 Crawford State Park at Farlington Lake (620) 362-3671 • E-11 Cross Timbers State Park at Toronto Lake (620)637-2213 bicycle, live, work, and play.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2018 Volume 14 Issue 11
    County Hunter News November 2018 Volume 14 Issue 11 Welcome to the On-Line County Hunter News, a monthly publication for those interested in ham radio county hunting, with an orientation toward CW operation. Contributions of articles, stories, letters, and pictures to the editor are welcomed, and may be included in future issues at the editor’s discretion. The County Hunter News will provide you with interesting, thought provoking articles, articles of county hunting history, or about county hunters or events, ham radio or electronics history, general ham radio interest, and provide news of upcoming operating events. We hope you will enjoy the County Hunter News. Feel free to forward, or provide links. Permission is given for copying or quoting in part or all provided credit is given to the CHNews and to the author of article. CW County Hunter Nets run on 14.0565, 10.122.5, and 7056.5, with activity occasionally on 3556.5 KHz. Also, there is SSB activity now is on ‘friendly net’ 7188 KHz. The CW folks are now pioneering 17M operation on 18.0915. (21.0565, 24.9155, and 28.0565 when sunspots better). Look around 18136 or for occasional 17M SSB runs usually after the run on 20M SSB. (21.336 and 28.336) You can see live spots of county hunter activity at ch.W6RK.com For information on county hunting, check out the following resources: The USACA award is sponsored by CQ Magazine. Rules and information are here: http://countyhunter.com/cq.htm For general information FAQ on County Hunting, check out: http://countyhunter.com/whatis.htm MARAC sponsors an award program for many other county hunting awards.
    [Show full text]