DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Impacts Report, Finalt DEIS/DEIR Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Impacts Report, Finalt DEIS/DEIR Table of Contents Metro 17-1489bg ©2017 lacmta Page intentionally left blank Contents Page List of Tables and Figures .................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Alternatives Considered ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Report Layout ............................................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 2 Regulatory Framework/Methodology .............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Federal Regulations ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 State Regulations ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.3 Local Regulations ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Transit .............................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.3 Parking ............................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.2.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 2-10 2.3 Significance Thresholds ......................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.3.2 State ................................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.4 Recent CEQA Litigation ......................................................................................................... 2-12 Chapter 3 Affected Environment/Existing Conditions ..................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Transit........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Existing Transit Network ................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Passenger Activity ........................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.3 Programmed Transit Improvements ............................................................................. 3-6 3.2 Highway and Roads .................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.1 Existing Highway Network ............................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.2 Existing Roadway Network ............................................................................................. 3-7 3.2.3 Study Area Level of Service ........................................................................................... 3-12 i East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor Transportation Impacts Report, Finalt DEIS/DEIR Table of Contents 3.2.4 Existing Parking Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-21 3.2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 3-23 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences/ Environmental Impacts .................................................. 4-1 4.1 Future Baseline Conditions/ No-Build Alternative ................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Transit .............................................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.1.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-13 4.2 Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative ................................................... 4-13 4.2.1 Transit ............................................................................................................................ 4-13 4.2.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4-13 4.2.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-14 4.2.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-14 4.3 BRT Alternative – Alternative 1 (Curb-Running BRT) ......................................................... 4-14 4.3.1 Transit ............................................................................................................................ 4-14 4.3.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4-15 4.3.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-25 4.3.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-29 4.4 BRT Alternative – Alternative 2 (Median-Running BRT) ..................................................... 4-29 4.4.1 Transit ............................................................................................................................ 4-29 4.4.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4-30 4.4.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-35 4.4.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-39 4.5 Rail Alternative – Alternative 3 (Low-Floor LRT/Tram) ....................................................... 4-39 4.5.1 Transit ............................................................................................................................ 4-39 4.5.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4-41 4.5.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-51 4.5.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-55 4.6 Rail Alternative – Alternative 4 (LRT) .................................................................................... 4-56 4.6.1 Transit ............................................................................................................................ 4-56 4.6.2 Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4-56 4.6.3 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 4-66 4.6.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................. 4-70 4.7 Overall Operational Impacts Summary ................................................................................. 4-71 4.8 Maintenance and Storage Facilities ....................................................................................... 4-75 4.8.1 TSM and BRT Alternative - Alternatives 3 and 4 .............................................................. 4-75 4.8.2 Rail Alternative - Alternatives 3 and 4 .......................................................................... 4-75 ii East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor Transportation Impacts Report, Finalt DEIS/DEIR Table of Contents 4.9 Effects on Parallel Corridors .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Demille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM The DeMille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 2 2 | APARTMENT NAME CONTENTS 04 |PROPERTY OVERVIEW MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 06 |AREA OVERVIEW - SAN FERNANDO VALLEY 10 |FINANCIAL OVERVIEW EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY BRANDON DICKER ASSOCIATE-MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 818 923 6118 Mobile +1 818 523 1754 [email protected] License No. 01958894 (CA) DAVID HARRINGTON EVP & NATIONAL DIRECTOR - MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 310 295 1170 Mobile +1 310 497 5590 [email protected] License No. 01320460 (CA) 3 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 4 Property Overview OPPORTUNITY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 7716 Laurel Canyon Boulevard presents a unique opportunity to capitalize • 16 Units, Built in 1970 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS on a well maintained multifamily property in one of Los Angeles’s most • Tremendous Rent Upside Potential of 83% popular rental markets, North Hollywood. Built in 1970, the building has • Great Mix of One, Two, and Three Bedroom Units been maintained very well and has a quiet and secluded feel. With central AC, heating, and on-site laundry, tenants are provided with the essentials • Building Size of 14,979 Square Feet and amenities of living in a prime neighborhood. This building will provide • Currently 100% Occupied an investor a great value-add opportunity with tremendous upside in rents • Lot Size of 0.45 Acres with R3 Zoning upwards of 89 percent. • Front Structure is Two Stories with 10 units, Back Structure is Two Stories with 6 Units The building consists of 16 units which include six one-bedroom units, • Units Feature Central Air Conditioning nine two-bedroom units, and one three-bedroom unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resource Guide North Hollywood
    Community Resource Guide North Hollywood Introduction Comprehensive Community Health Centers, Inc. (CCHC) is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) and a California Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation. CCHC is among the top community health center systems in Los Angeles County having grown in health service visits from 45,000 visits in 2004 to over 129,000 visits in 2015. With this guide, CCHC will provide you with the proper resources to help you an your families. What you will find The Community Resource Guide for Comprehensive Community Health Centers is divided into 14 sections. Table of Contents 2-1-1 LA County Infoline………………………………………………………...……………….. Child Support Services………………………………………………………...……………….. Crisis Hotlines………………………………………………………………………………..…… Domestic Violence……………………………………………………………………………….. Employment………………………………………………………………………………….. Food Banks …………………………………………………………………………..…………… Grief & Loss Services ………………………………………………………………………….. Legal Services …………………………………………………………………………..…………... Mental Health …………………………………………………………………………..…….……... Physical Activity …………………………………………………………………………………… Self– Help Groups………………………………………………………………………………….. Shelters ………………………………………….……………………………………..…………… Substance Abuse………………………………………………………………………………….. Utility Services………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 2-1-1 LA County– Infoline 3 2-1-1 LA County Infoline Website: www.healthcity.com Services: Dial 2-1-1 from any area code for free 24-hr multilingual information & referrals to human services. Referrals are available for domestic violence,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 - Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
    Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures CHAPTER 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3-1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with the information necessary to understand and evaluate the potential environmental impacts due to implementation of the proposed Los Angeles Valley College Facilities Master Plan (Master Plan). In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (§15128 and §15143), this EIR focuses on the impacts identified in the NOP and during project scoping as needing further analysis (visual resources; air quality, historical resources; archaeological resources; paleontological resources; geology/soils/seismicity; hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use and planning; noise; population and housing; public services; transportation, traffic and parking; and public utilities). A list of the impacts determined to be less than significant and the reasons for that determination are provided in Chapter 5. To assist the reader, each environmental impact category in this EIR is discussed separately. These discussions include a description of the environmental setting, the criteria used to determine significance of potential effects, the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project, mitigation measures, and any unavoidable significant adverse effects that would remain after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. The environmental setting discussions contain a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project as it existed at the time the Notice of Preparation was distributed (January 2003). The existing environmental conditions described in the setting sections serve as a baseline for the impact analyses in this EIR. The significance criteria identified for each environmental impact category are based on the definitions that have been developed and established by the Los Angeles Community College District, various public agencies, or professional organizations and are consistent with the State CEQA Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Latinos | Creating Shopping Centers to Meet Their Needs May 23, 2014 by Anthony Pingicer
    Latinos | Creating shopping centers to meet their needs May 23, 2014 by Anthony Pingicer Source: DealMakers.net One in every six Americans is Latino. Since 1980, the Latino population in the United States has increased dramatically from 14.6 million, per the Census Bureau, to exceeding 50 million today. This escalation is not just seen in major metropolitan cities and along the America-Mexico border, but throughout the country, from Cook County, Illinois to Miami-Dade, Florida. By 2050, the Latino population is projected to reach 134.8 million, resulting in a 30.2 percent share of the U.S. population. Latinos are key players in the nation’s economy. While the present economy benefits from Latinos, the future of the U.S. economy is most likely to depend on the Latino market, according to “State of the Hispanic Consumer: The Hispanic Market Imperative,” a report released by Nielsen, an advertising and global marketing research company. According to the report, the Latino buying power of $1 trillion in 2010 is predicted to see a 50 percent increase by next year, reaching close to $1.5 trillion in 2015. The U.S. Latino market is one of the top 10 economies in the world and Latino households in America that earn $50,000 or more are growing at a faster rate than total U.S. households. As for consumption trends, Latinos tend to spend more money per shopping trip and are also expected to become a powerful force in home purchasing during the next decade. Business is booming for Latinos. According to a study by the Partnership for a New Economy, the number of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 49 | No. 6 | Fourth Quarter 2013 Dave Clunk
    Dave Clunk SVP-Designate of Real Estate and Store Planning, Sterling Jewelers Inc. Volume 49 | No. 6 | Fourth Quarter 2013 HAPPENINGS INSIDE: Macerich Celebrates CultureArte | Talking Holiday with Dana Telsey | Macerich Partners with Blackhawk Network | Meet Bob Beffa, Senior VP Real Estate Macerich Happenings | Fourth Quarter 2013 Queens Center in New York City, one of the country’s top-performing malls, capped off a highly successful celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month Macerich with the launch of CultureArte, a star-studded, two-day weekend event. The firstCultureArte drew thousands of shoppers by honoring the richness and Launches diversity of Latin culture through music, dance, fashion and beauty. Key elements of CultureArte included live dance performances by salsa CultureArte, superstars Yesenia Adame and Rodrigo Guzman, as seen on “Dancing with the Stars,” an exclusive concert by Aurora & Zon del Barrio with Chocolate, featuring Larry Harlow, and a high-energy fashion show from A Star-studded Macy’s, JCPenney, Club Monaco, Steve Madden, Caparros Shoes, and Aveda’s Natural Look Salon. Top national sponsors included Universal Music Celebration of Latino, Univision Radio, Microsoft and more. Every hour offered something new and exciting to delight and entertain shoppers at two stages and an Hispanic interactive sponsor area. Buoyed by enthusiastic crowds, the first CultureArte stacked up as a success Heritage Month according to a number of metrics: • Nearly 120,000 people came to the mall on Saturday and Sunday – a 7% High-Profile Pilot Event at Queens increase. • Major New York news outlets covered the event, including NBC4, NY1, Center Will Expand to Los Angeles KOZI-T V, Queens Courier, Queens Tribune, Western Queens Gazette and El & Phoenix in 2014 Correo.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Case No. 21-10632 (MBK)
    Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 92 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: Chapter 11 L’OCCITANE, INC., Case No. 21-10632 (MBK) Debtor. Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ana M. Galvan, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On April 2, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: Notice of Deadline for Filing Proofs of Claim Against the Debtor L’Occitane, Inc. (attached hereto as Exhibit C) [Customized] Official Form 410 Proof of Claim (attached hereto as Exhibit D) Official Form 410 Instructions for Proof of Claim (attached hereto as Exhibit E) Dated: April 6, 2021 /s/ Ana M. Galvan Ana M. Galvan STRETTO 410 Exchange, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 Telephone: 855-434-5886 Email: [email protected] Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 92 Exhibit A Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 92 Exhibit A Served via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 City State Zip Country 1046 Madison Ave LLC c/o HMH Realty Co., Inc., Rexton Realty Co.
    [Show full text]
  • NEV Strategy Publication Rev 4.Indd
    Fig. 5 - Centers, Sustainable Community Strategy 26 Page WWW.NORTHEASTSTRATEGY.ORG services. This will require pro-active intervention SECTION 4 - PLANNING TARGETS in order to help re-establish the full array of goods, Northeast San Fernando Valley Opportunities services and amenities sought by local residents. Given the extensive size and population of the The selection of Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, Northeast Valley, the selection of initial target areas between Laurel Canyon Boulevard and San Fer- is key to the potential success of the endeavor. nando Road (Figure 11), is consistent with the Often the areas of greatest challenge are also the “Great Streets” program in the City of Los Angeles, areas of greatest opportunity. and with the Urban Land Institute’s “Healthy Cor- The project team selected fi ve initial “centroids” ridors” targets. It is a classic Southern California based on their profi le as centers, their proximity to “main street” and serves as the backbone for the existing or proposed transportation, their zoning, Pacoima Center TOD. This is an excellent oppor- or in the case of Sun Valley’s landfi lls and heavy tunity to demonstrate the importance of strategic industrial lands, their environmental challenges. civic, government and community alliances. For analysis, in each case the relevant study area The Panorama Mall and Shopping Area (Figure 13) adopted is a half-mile radius or band catchment came into being in the 1960s, one of the fi rst major area around each centroid. (Figure 5) shopping centers in the Southern California. Com- plementary shops occupied both sides of Van Nuys The half-mile distance has become accepted for Boulevard, and several square blocks with parcels gauging a transit station’s catchment area in the that are unusually deep.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Toxic Drycleaner List
    South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (909) 396-2000 www.aqmd.gov Store Name Business address Business city Business zip Equipment type Los Angeles Tic Toc Cleaners 5735 Kanan Road Agoura 91301- Hydrocarbon Jim Dandy Cleaners 28708 Roadside Dr., Suite I Agoura Hills 91301- Hydrocarbon Agoura Cleaners 5009 Kanan Rd. Agoura Hills 91301- Hydrocarbon Galaxy Cleaners 5855 Kanan Road Agoura Hills 91301- Hydrocarbon Dryclean Express Cleaners 1028 East Valley Boulevard Alhambra 91801- Hydrocarbon Buckboard Cleaners 1465 East Valley Boulevard Alhambra 91801- Wet Clean Hill Top Cleaners 151 E. Foothill Blvd. Arcadia 91006- Hydrocarbon Swiss Cleaners 9065 Woodman Avenue Arleta 91331- Hydrocarbon Fulton Cleaners 9081 Woodman Ave Arleta 91331- Hydrocarbon Value Cleaners 11414-B Artesia Boulevard Artesia 90701- Hydrocarbon Ajay Cleaners 11831 Artesia Boulevard Artesia 90701- Hydrocarbon Rosedale Cleaners 1173A East Alosta Avenue Azusa 91702- Wet Clean Quality Cleaners 4077 East Gage Avenue Bell 90201- Hydrocarbon V+M Cleaners 6200 South Eastern Avenue, #H Bell Gardens 90201- Hydrocarbon Dick's Cleaners 6536 Eastern Avenue Bell Gardens 90201- Hydrocarbon Express Cleaners 17210 Lakewood Blvd Bellflower 90706- Hydrocarbon Non Pareil Cleaners 8624 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills 90211- CO2 Best Quality Cleaners 9115 West Olympic Blvd. Beverly Hills 90212- Hydrocarbon Brentwood Village Cleaners 11722 Barrington Court Brentwood 90049- Hydrocarbon 1212 North San Fernando REX 1 hr Cleaners Boulevard, #E Burbank 91504- Hydrocarbon Evergreen Cleaners 2436 West Victory Boulevard Burbank 91505- Hydrocarbon Allen's Dry Cleaning 321 East Alameda, #F Burbank 91502- Hydrocarbon * Please note that this is a list of professional cleaners in the region that use non-perchloroethylene alternative technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Arterial System Detection Project
    South Bay Arterial System Detection Project Infrastructure Working Group Meeting September 9, 2020 South Bay Arterial System Detection Project Topics Covered • Jurisdictions in the Project area • Project Background • Project Scope • Preliminary Design • Design Phase I • Design Phase II • Anticipated Construction Schedule • Map and List of Intersections Jurisdictions • Unincorporated Los Angeles County • Carson • El Segundo • Gardena • Hawthorne • Hermosa Beach • Lawndale • Manhattan Beach • Redondo Beach • Torrance Project Background • Conceptual Design Plan identified and recommended improvements in the South Bay Region, including: • Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras • Communication Upgrades (Fiber) • Arterial System Detection • These enhancements improve traffic flows and reduce traffic congestion. • This project centers on the arterial performance Example CCTV camera measurement as part of the following south bay regional programs: 1. Los Angeles County Public Works South Bay Signal Synchronization and Bus Speed Improvements Plan 2. South Bay Cities Council of Governments South Bay Highway Program Strategic Transportation Element Project Scope Identify and install arterial system detectors at select locations within South Bay Cities to support traffic signal operations and network performance measures • Types of detector technologies studied and available: • Split advance loops, Bluetooth readers, Wi-fi readers, Radar, and Video detection • These devices can provide the following benefits • Enable traffic responsive signal operations
    [Show full text]
  • 7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405
    7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405 Exclusively Listed by: Kelly Morgan | 310.836.3638 [email protected] CalDRE 01898026 1 7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT All materials and information received or derived from Kelly Morgan Commercial Kelly Morgan Commercial Group makes no warranties and/or representations Group, its directors, officers, agents, advisors, affiliates and/or any third party sources regarding the veracity, completeness, or relevance of any financial data or assumptions. are provided without representation or warranty as to completeness , veracity, or Kelly Morgan Commercial Group does not serve as a financial advisor to any party accuracy, condition of the property, compliance or lack of compliance with applicable regarding any proposed transaction. All data and assumptions regarding financial governmental requirements, developability or suitability, financial performance of the performance, including that used for financial modeling purposes, may differ from property, projected financial performance of the property for any party’s intended use actual data or performance. or any and all other matters. Any estimates of market rents and/or projected rents that may be provided to a party Neither Kelly Morgan Commercial Group, its directors, officers, agents, advisors, or do not necessarily mean that rents can be established at or increased to that level. affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to accuracy or Parties must evaluate any applicable contractual and governmental limitations as well completeness of the any materials or information provided, derived, or received. as market conditions, vacancy factors and other issues in order to determine rents Materials and information from any source, whether written or verbal, that may be from or for the property.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of EXISTING CONDITIONS a Subregional View Of
    ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A subregional view of travel on the Westside has been drawn from interviews with elected officials, meetings with MTA and other agencies and analysis of existing data. The subregion considered in this analysis is shown in Figure 1. Because transportation does not respect political boundaries, the Westside Mobility Study area is roughly all of Los Angeles County west of La Brea Avenue, north of Los Angeles International Airport and south of Mulholland Drive. The Westside has many of the most important activity centers in all of Southern California; 16 of these are shown in Figure 2. The Westside Mobility Study has begun to define what might be done to meet those needs for improved linkages, specifying the most critical locations for major transit improvements and other multimodal improvements. Evaluation of Existing Transportation Conditions A goal of the Westside Mobility Study is to provide an accurate picture of the existing traffic and congestion levels on primary arterials and corridors in the Westside area. As there was a large amount of readily available, current data, no new supplementary traffic counts were conducted. Data was acquired from the following sources and ranges predominantly from 2000 to the present day: · Traffic data from the Cities of Beverly Hills, Culver City, Santa Monica and West Hollywood · Transit data from Culver City Bus, Big Blue Bus and MTA · Information from MTA’s Short Range Transportation Plan: Technical Document · Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) database of traffic counts · Previous Kaku Associates projects · Caltrans counts 10 WESTSIDE MOBILITY STUDY SSOCI TES A Corporation FIGURE 1 STUDY AREA Multi-purpose Activity Centers WESTSIDE MOBILITY STUDY SSOCI TES A Corporation FIGURE 2 MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS Area Characteristics - Employment, Population and Housing: The Westside area has at least 10% of the jobs in Los Angeles County and is home to over 6% of County residents.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Los Angeles Automated Photo Red Intersections (PRL)
    City of Los Angeles Automated Photo Red Intersections (PRL) Operations-Central Bureau Automated Photo Red Light Intersections Locations Status Deactivated on June 14, 2005. Will not be Vermont Avenue and 3rd Street reactivated. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. Will not be Vermont Avenue and 6th Street reactivated. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. Will not be Sunset Boulevard and Vermont Avenue reactivated Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S scheduled to be retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated Soto Street and Olympic Boulevard activation date May 2006. Operations-South Bureau Automated Photo Red Light Intersections Locations Status Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S being retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated activation date Imperial Highway and Figueroa Street July 2006. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S being retrofitted with new PRL system. Activation date March 15, La Brea Avenue and Rodeo Road 2006. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S being retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated activation date May Florence Avenue and Figueroa Street 2006. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. Will not be Manchester and Western Avenues reactivated. Operations-Valley Bureau Automated Photo Red Light Intersections Locations Status Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S scheduled to be retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated Victory and Laurel Canyon Boulevards activation date April 2006. Being retrofitted with new system. I/S scheduled to be retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated DeSoto Avenue and Roscoe Boulevard activation date June 2006. Deactivated on June 14, 2005. I/S scheduled to be retrofitted with new PRL system. Estimated Van Nuys Boulevard and Nordhoff Street activation date July 2006.
    [Show full text]