December 2019 £3.20
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Standard No7 V5.Indd
University of St Andrews The StAndard Staff Magazine, Issue 7, March 2006 I’m with the Band Development’s Dynamic Duo Mail Room’s First Class Service The Future of our Finances Scotland’s fi rst university Produced by: The StAndard Editorial Board Joint Chairs: Stephen Magee is Vice-Principal (External Relations) Contents and Director of Admissions. To be announced in next issue Page 1: Welcome Pages 2-15: PEOPLE Joe Carson is a Lecturer in the Department of French, Disabilities Officer in the School of Modern Languages, Warden of University Hall and the Senior Pages 16-20: TOWN Warden of the University. Pages 21-22: OPINION Jim Douglas is Assistant Facilities Manager in the Estates Department and line manager for cleaning supervisors, janitors, mailroom staff and the out of Pages 23-32: GOWN hours service. Page 33-37: NEWS John Haldane is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Centre for Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs. Chris Lusk is Director of Student Support Services covering disability, counselling, welfare, student development, orientation and equal opportunities. Jim Naismith teaches students in Chemistry and Biology and carries out research in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences. The StAndard is funded by the University Niall Scott is Director of the Press Office. and edited by the Press Office under the direction of an independent Editorial Board comprising staff from every corner of the institution. The Editorial Board welcomes all suggestions, letters, articles, news and photography from staff, students and members of the wider Dawn Waddell is Secretary for the School of Art St Andrews community. -
Master Thesis
Master Thesis Sustainability reporting in the airline industry: a comparative case study analysis of four selected European passenger airlines and their countries of registration on the basis of the airlines’ annual reports and sustainability report from 2018 Student: Laura Vani Kesore (s2015323) [email protected] Study program: Public Administration M.Sc. First Supervisor: Prof. Dr. René Torenvlied [email protected] Second Supervisor: Dr. Ringo Ossewaarde [email protected] Master Thesis 24 August 2020 University of Twente, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences Drienerlolaan 5 7522 NB Enschede, NL Abstract Sustainability reporting for airlines is becoming more and more important. The driving forces are the external and internal pressures, such as demand from the public and society, from governments, stakeholders and shareholders, as well as from NGOs, activists, and the industry- intern economic competition between the airlines. Within the scope of this research, the main focus was on the research question: How can the variation in the claims of sustainable measures reported in the 2018 annual reports and sustainability reports by four different European airlines be explained from the characteristics of the airlines and of the countries in which the airlines are registered?. The ecosystem for the conducted analyses consists of four airlines from four different countries in the European Union. Seven sustainability parameters were chosen in order to objectively analyze the sustainability reporting of the airlines and of their countries of registrations. The parameters are: (I) alternative fuel, (II) CORSIA, (III) aviation tax, (IV) aircraft age, (V) aircraft design, (VI) Dow Jones Sustainability Index, and (VII) atmosfair Airline Index. -
Read Book Hampshire Airfields in the Second World
HAMPSHIRE AIRFIELDS IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Robin J. Brooks | 192 pages | 31 Dec 1996 | COUNTRYSIDE BOOKS | 9781853064142 | English | Berks, United Kingdom Hampshire Airfields in the Second World War PDF Book Add to basket Buy Now Item Price. RAF Nefyn [40] [41]. Military attractions in Hampshire is part of Visit Hampshire the official tourism website. Count: Out of stock. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Netherlands East Indies. Discover military attractions in Portsmouth. The runway is now buried under the M5 motorway. RAF Ulbster. RAF Broad Bay. Mexican P Thunderbolts of Squadron fly over the unforgiving terrain of central Luzon in July Archived from the original on 18 October More search options. This was a 'Q-t Built as satellite to RAF Milfield. Now Kibrit Air Base. RAF Hmawbi. The most obvious route, via the Azores, was not an option as Portugal remained staunchly neutral until August Search Military Attractions. Solent Sky Museum tells the fascinating story of this magical warplane. Use this tool to build your own journey or choose from an exciting range of specially selected tours. British Mauritius. RAF Maharajpur. RAF Half Die. RAF Fordoun. Now City of Derry Airport , Derry. RAF Jemappes. Underground bunker of contains the Group Operations Room from where the vital 11 Fighter Group was commanded during the Battle of Britain. RAF Dalby [27]. Part of the site is retained by the Ministry of Defence and leased to the Met Office. Also known as RAF Heathfield. RAF Calvo. The Aldershot Military Museum is situated on a active Army base giving visitors even more of an authentic experience. -
Scotrail Franchise – Franchise Agreement
ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS and ABELLIO SCOTRAIL LIMITED SCOTRAIL FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 6453447-13 ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Interpretation and Definitions .................................................................................... 1 2. Commencement .......................................................................................................... 2 3. Term ............................................................................................................ 3 4 Franchisee’s Obligations ........................................................................................... 3 5 Unjustified Enrichment ............................................................................................... 4 6 Arm's Length Dealings ............................................................................................... 4 7 Compliance with Laws................................................................................................ 4 8 Entire Agreement ........................................................................................................ 4 9 Governing Law ............................................................................................................ 5 SCHEDULE 1 ............................................................................................................ 7 PASSENGER SERVICE OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................................. 7 SCHEDULE 1.1 ........................................................................................................... -
2017 Monthly Data.Xlsx
General Mitchell International Airport MONTHLY DATA: Year-End 2017 PASSENGERS LNDG WT SHARE MAIL FREIGHT AIRLINES ENP DEP TOTAL MKT SHR LANDGS INT'L OLTS SCREENED LBS % ENP DEP TOTAL ENP DEP TOTAL ACP JETS 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERO CHARTER 0 0 00.00% 7 0 0 0 74,520 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERODYNAMICS 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AEROMEXICO 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 146,300 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERONAVES 0 0 00.00% 4 0 0 0 314,000 0.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR BERLIN 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 396,832 0.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIRCRAFT MGMT GROUP 0 0 0 0.00% 6 0 0 0 128,950 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR GEORGIAN/CANADA 17,264 17,782 35,046 0.51% 571 35,046 0 17,264 26,837,000 0.58% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR INDIA 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR NUNAVUT 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR PARTNER 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIRSTAR 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 9,800 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TRANSPORT 0 0 00.00% 2 0 0 0 37,500 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AITHERAS AVIATION 0 0 0 0.00% 5 0 0 0 76,000 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALASKA AIRLINES 30,680 30,750 61,430 0.89% 445 0 0 30,680 33,438,208 0.72% 9,433 5,494 14,927 748 7,142 7,890 ALBATROS AIRCRAFT CORP 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALGONQUIN AIRLINK 0 0 0 0.00% 2 0 0 0 30,400 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALLEGIANT 10,691 10,114 20,805 0.30% 89 0 0 10,691 12,602,031 0.27% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN AIR CHARTERS 0 0 0 0.00% 7 0 0 0 98,400 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN AIRLINES 219,796 219,973 439,769 6.37% 1,899 0 0 219,796 251,848,712 5.43% 329,626 356,592 686,218 38,445 93,907 132,352 AMERICAN EAGLE/AIR WIS 80,443 81,853 162,296 -
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Norway) For the definitions of capitalised terms used throughout this Registration Document, see Section 13 “Definitions and Glossary”. Investing in the Shares involves risks; see Section 1 “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5. Investing in the Shares, including the Offer Shares, and other securities issued by the Issuer involves a particularly high degree of risk. Prospective investors should read the entire Prospectus, comprising of this Registration Document, the Securities Note dated 6 May 2021 and the Summary dated 6 May 2021, and, in particular, consider the risk factors set out in this Registration Document and the Securities Note when considering an investment in the Company. The Company has been severely impacted by the current outbreak of COVID-19. In a very short time period, the Company has lost most of its revenues and is in adverse financial distress. This has adversely and materially affected the Group’s contracts, rights and obligations, including financing arrangements, and the Group is not capable of complying with its ongoing obligations and is currently subject to event of default. On 18 November 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries applied for Examinership in Ireland (and were accepted into Examinership on 7 December 2020), and on 8 December 2020 the Company applied for and was accepted into Reconstruction in Norway. These processes were sanctioned by the Irish and Norwegian courts on 26 March 2021 and 12 April 2021 respectively, however remain subject to potential appeals in Norway (until 12 May 2021) and certain other conditions precedent, including but not limited to the successful completion of a capital raise in the amount of at least NOK 4,500 million (including the Rights Issue, the Private Placement and issuance of certain convertible hybrid instruments as described further herein). -
Vea Un Ejemplo
3 To search aircraft in the registration index, go to page 178 Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page 10 Tanker Air Carrier 8 Air Georgian 20 Amapola Flyg 32 Belavia 45 21 Air 8 Air Ghana 20 Amaszonas 32 Bering Air 45 2Excel Aviation 8 Air Greenland 20 Amaszonas Uruguay 32 Berjaya Air 45 748 Air Services 8 Air Guilin 20 AMC 32 Berkut Air 45 9 Air 8 Air Hamburg 21 Amelia 33 Berry Aviation 45 Abu Dhabi Aviation 8 Air Hong Kong 21 American Airlines 33 Bestfly 45 ABX Air 8 Air Horizont 21 American Jet 35 BH Air - Balkan Holidays 46 ACE Belgium Freighters 8 Air Iceland Connect 21 Ameriflight 35 Bhutan Airlines 46 Acropolis Aviation 8 Air India 21 Amerijet International 35 Bid Air Cargo 46 ACT Airlines 8 Air India Express 21 AMS Airlines 35 Biman Bangladesh 46 ADI Aerodynamics 9 Air India Regional 22 ANA Wings 35 Binter Canarias 46 Aegean Airlines 9 Air Inuit 22 AnadoluJet 36 Blue Air 46 Aer Lingus 9 Air KBZ 22 Anda Air 36 Blue Bird Airways 46 AerCaribe 9 Air Kenya 22 Andes Lineas Aereas 36 Blue Bird Aviation 46 Aereo Calafia 9 Air Kiribati 22 Angkasa Pura Logistics 36 Blue Dart Aviation 46 Aero Caribbean 9 Air Leap 22 Animawings 36 Blue Islands 47 Aero Flite 9 Air Libya 22 Apex Air 36 Blue Panorama Airlines 47 Aero K 9 Air Macau 22 Arab Wings 36 Blue Ridge Aero Services 47 Aero Mongolia 10 Air Madagascar 22 ARAMCO 36 Bluebird Nordic 47 Aero Transporte 10 Air Malta 23 Ariana Afghan Airlines 36 Boliviana de Aviacion 47 AeroContractors 10 Air Mandalay 23 Arik Air 36 BRA Braathens Regional 47 Aeroflot 10 Air Marshall Islands 23 -
St Andrews Hospital
) 3 1 0 2 r e b m e v o N ( 5 e u s s I k u . v o g . e f i f @ s e c i v r e s . n o i t a t r o p s n a r t : l i a m - e ☎ ) 5 0 9 2 4 4 . t x e ( 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 4 3 0 o f n i . s u b s u l p . w w w . r o t c o d s u B s u l P y b s l a r r e f e R r u o y k s a e s a e l p n o i t a m r o f n i r e h t r u f r o F . y l n o r o t c o d T L 5 7 Y K , s e h t o r n e l G h s i t t o c S e h T . e c i v r e S y c n e g r e m E - n o N e c i v r e S e c n a l u b m A , t e e r t S h t r o N , e s u o H e f i F , l i c n u o C e f i F , n o i t a t r o p s n a r T f o d a e H e h T o l s y h r : l i a m - e k u . -
Tay Estuary Rail Study Working Paper B Constraints and Development of Options
` Tay Estuary Rail Study Working Paper B Constraints and Development of Options May 2003 BTR3726 28/05/2003 Babtie Group 95 Bothwell Street, Glasgow G2 7HX Tel 0141 204 2511 Fax 0141 226 3109 Tay Estuary Rail Study Working Paper B – Constraints and Development of Options Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Existing Services and Constraints 3 3.0 Service Options 7 3.1 The Options 7 3.2 The Service frequency 7 4.0 Assessment of Options 11 4.1 The East West Axis 11 4.1.1 Option A: Dundee – Carnoustie 11 4.1.2 Option B: Dundee – Arbroath 14 4.1.3 Option C: Dundee – Montrose 17 4.1.4 Option D: Montrose – Brechin 21 4.1.5 Option E: Perth to Carnoustie and Arbroath 22 4.1.6 Option F: Perth – Montrose 25 4.1.7 Dundee West Service Extensions 27 4.2 The North South Axis 29 4.2.1 Option G: Arbroath – Ladybank 29 4.2.2 Option H: Perth – Dundee – Ladybank 31 4.2.3 Option I: Dundee West – Leuchars 32 4.2.4 Option J: Leuchars - St Andrews 34 5.0 Station Appraisals 36 5.1 General Discussion 36 5.2 The East West Axis Stations 37 5.2.1 Montrose 37 5.2.2 Arbroath 41 5.2.3 Carnoustie 45 5.2.4 Golf Street 48 5.2.5 Barry Links 50 5.2.6 Monifieth 52 5.2.7 Balmossie 55 5.2.8 Broughty Ferry 57 5.2.9 Dundee 59 5.2.10 Dundee West 63 5.2.11 Invergowrie 65 5.2.12 Perth 67 5.3 The North South Axis Stations 70 5.3.1 Leuchars 70 5.3.2 Cupar 73 5.3.3 Springfield 76 5.3.4 Ladybank 79 6.0 Summary of Options and Costs 82 Appendices Appendix A Option Base Timetable Appendix B Station Audit Proforma Appendix C Dundee West – Proposed Station Location \\Douglas\Work\Projects\4900s\4976\Outputs\Reports\Final\WP B (Constraints and Option Development) v5.doc Page 1 Tay Estuary Rail Study Working Paper B – Constraints and Development of Options Copyright Babtie Group Limited. -
Leuchars Community Council
LEUCHARS COMMUNITY COUNCIL Meeting held in the Community Centre, Leuchars 1 December 2015 Present: Carroll Finnie (Chair), Trish Graham (Secretary), Joyce Edmonston, Jill Russell, Martin Kinsey (SSO), Susan Budd, Cllr Bill Connor, Cllr Tim Brett, Alisdair Gilbert, Trish Downie, Veronica Taylor, Sam Cullen, Athol Stewart, Wilma Henderson (Ye Olde Hotel), Steve Bargeton (Communications & Public Affairs Manager, Univ of St Andrews), Dave Rainey (Vital), Phil Hutchinson (Vital), Elaine Gibson, three members of the public. Item Action Point 1. Chair’s opening remarks: CF welcomed everyone to the meeting. 2. Apologies: Cllr Maggie Taylor, Mark Sharp, Dave Baxter, Jim Finnie, Jenny Ramsay, Steve Simpson 3. Presentation – Community cafe E Gibson spoke of her plans to open a community social hub/café in the old estate agent premises during 2016. It is hoped volunteers will run it and that it might create local jobs. Flyers will be distributed soon to canvass opinion on setting up the café. SB suggested EG might apply for community covenant funding and that she might be able to help promote it. Cllr Brett also suggested EG speaks with Balmullo and Guardbridge community councils. 4. Presentation – Biomass pipe laying at Guardbridge Steve Bargeton introduced himself, Dave Rainey and Phil Hutchison. DR/PH are engineers with Vital, the company installing the biomass plant at Guardbridge. There followed a presentation about the likely traffic diversion from 15.02.16-08.04.16 when a section of the pipe which will cross the main road is being installed. Everyone had the opportunity to ask questions, including about bus routes, closure dates etc. -
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NORTHERN AIR CARGO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) Civil Action No. 10-2076 (EGS) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2010, the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) granted an equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) on five mainline routes in rural Alaska pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(5)(c) (“§ 5402(g)(5)(C)”). This equitable tender is now being challenged by three mainline carriers – Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”), Tatonduk Outfitters Ltd d/b/a Everts Air Cargo (“Everts”), and Lynden Air Cargo LLC (“Lynden”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the Postal Service’s purportedly ultra vires determination that PenAir had satisfied the “Prior Service and Capacity Requirement” of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II) (“§ 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II)”) as of Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 25 December 3, 2010.1 Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. See generally Compl. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as well as the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Postal Service and Defendant-Intervenor PenAir (collectively, “defendants”). Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment. -
Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.